Access to this full-text is provided by MDPI.
Content available from Nutrients
This content is subject to copyright.
nutrients
Review
The Association of Poor Oral Health Parameters with
Malnutrition in Older Adults: A Review Considering
the Potential Implications for Cognitive Impairment
Anastassia E. Kossioni
Division of Gerodontology, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University
of Athens, Thivon 2, 11527 Athens, Greece; akossion@dent.uoa.gr; Tel.: +30-210-746-1246
Received: 4 October 2018; Accepted: 6 November 2018; Published: 8 November 2018
Abstract:
Poor dental status and chewing deficiencies have been associated with cognitive decline.
Altered dietary habits and malnutrition have been suggested as linking mechanisms. The aim of
the present review was thus to investigate if poor oral health, and in particular tooth loss and
impaired masticatory function, may affect dietary selection and nutritional intake in older adults,
and moreover, to assess if prosthodontic dental care may improve nutritional status. Extensive
tooth loss may impair masticatory function. Several studies in older populations have shown that
severe tooth loss and masticatory impairment are associated with limited consumption of various
food types (especially fruits and vegetables), increased consumption of sugary and easy-to-chew
foods, and lower dietary intake of fibre and vitamins. However, these findings are not consistently
reported, due to methodological variation among studies, potential adverse causalities, and the
multifactorial nature of food choices. On the other hand, a few interventional studies revealed that
prosthetic rehabilitation of missing teeth, when accompanied by dietary counselling, may improve
dietary habits and nutritional intake. Further research is required to improve current knowledge of
these associations. Under the limitations of the current study, a functional dental arch of natural or
artificial teeth is important for maintaining adequate chewing efficiency and ability, but this only
partly contributes to food choices and nutritional status. The multifactorial nature of food choices
necessitates the interprofessional collaboration of dental professionals, dietetics practitioners, and
primary care providers to improve dietary habits and nutritional intake.
Keywords:
oral health; tooth loss; masticatory function; dental care; dietary habits; nutrition; dietary
counselling; cognitive decline
1. Introduction
Oral health is important for well-being as it is associated with pain, infection, xerostomia, problems
with chewing, swallowing, speaking, smiling, communicating, and socializing [
1
,
2
]. Oral disease
is common in older adults, and involves tooth loss, poor oral hygiene (increased amounts of soft
and mineralized deposits found on teeth and denture surfaces), high prevalence of dental caries
and periodontal disease, defective prosthetic appliances or absence of prosthetic rehabilitation,
hyposalivation, and various oral lesions, often associated with denture-wearing but also with
precancerous or cancerous states [
1
–
4
]. Most oral conditions can be prevented, or efficiently managed,
if detected early [5].
The oral cavity is the first part of the digestive tract, responsible for biting the food, chewing,
adding saliva for bolus formation, and transporting it into the stomach [
6
,
7
]. Deficits in any of these
stages may impair eating. Some poor oral health indicators, and particularly tooth loss and chewing
deficiency, have been associated with nutritional impairment [8–12].
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709; doi:10.3390/nu10111709 www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 2 of 10
The potential association of some poor oral health parameters with cognitive decline has recently
gained increasing attention [
13
–
18
]. Two of the most commonly reported ones are tooth loss [
13
,
14
,
16
]
and masticatory impairment [
15
,
18
]. A systematic review investigating the association between
mastication and cognitive status, recorded by various cognitive function tests (Mini-Mental State
Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, digit-symbol substitution, etc.), revealed that
poorer mastication was associated with lower cognitive function in 15 of the 17 cross-sectional studies,
and a steeper decline in five of the six prospective studies [18]. The same systematic review recorded
that poorer mastication was a significant risk factor for having dementia or mild memory impairment
in four of five cross-sectional studies and for the incidence of dementia or mild memory impairment
(MMI) in four of five prospective studies [
18
]. Potential linking mechanisms are altered dietary habits
due to impaired oral health, and malnutrition [17–19].
Decreased consumption of fibre and micronutrients and increased consumption of softer,
easy-to-chew foods rich in saturated fats and cholesterol may be associated with cognitive impairment
either through micronutrient deficiencies (i.e., vitamin B12, thiamine) or by adopting unhealthy diets,
increasing the risk of stroke and dementia [
17
]. It should be noted that adherence to the Mediterranean
diet has been associated with reduced risk for mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and particularly
Alzheimer’s disease [
20
], but other diets, adapted to regional cultures, are also being investigated,
showing promising results [
21
]. Moreover, mastication might be a protective factor for cognitive
decline, as it is related to increased blood flow in specific brain areas (the cerebral cortex, cerebellum,
thalamus, and hippocampus) [
19
,
22
]. However, the nature and causality of these associations is yet to
be determined as there are many confounding factors [14,16,18].
Based on the hypothesis that tooth loss and chewing problems may be associated with cognitive
decline, mainly through altered dietary habits and malnutrition, the present review aims to investigate
if oral parameters, and in particular tooth loss and impaired masticatory function, may affect dietary
selection and nutritional intake in older adults. The aim was moreover to assess if prosthodontic dental
care may improve nutritional status.
The null hypotheses are that: (1) poor oral health, and particularly poor dental status, negatively
affect masticatory function; (2) poor oral health, and particularly poor dental status and masticatory
impairment, induce altered food selection and malnutrition; and (3) prosthodontic care improves
nutritional status.
2. Does Poor Oral Health Affect Masticatory Function?
Masticatory function can be evaluated objectively using various tests (chewing efficiency tests,
biting force, etc.), and subjectively using questionnaires. While objective chewing problems are directly
related to fewer number of teeth [
7
,
23
], subjective chewing difficulties, particularly when eating hard
food, start when there are fewer than 20 teeth in the mouth [
8
,
24
]. The subjective perception of
masticatory ability is generally more optimistic than the objective one [
24
], but may be more crucial for
the individual’s dietary choices.
Apart from the actual number of remaining teeth, their arrangement in the dental arch is also
important for chewing performance; therefore, a more sensitive indicator for chewing problems is the
number of occluding tooth contacts or functional tooth units or occluding tooth units, particularly
in the area of premolars and molars. A systematic review investigating the association between
functional teeth units and chewing ability in older adults, based on self-reporting, has shown that
chewing problems increased with decreasing numbers of posterior functional tooth units, when the
remaining teeth were unevenly distributed, or when there were tooth-bounded spaces [24].
More than three posterior functional tooth units are necessary to keep the functional ability of the
stomatognathic system in older age [
25
–
27
]. Individuals with fewer than three posterior functional
tooth units have a reduced masticatory performance (by 30–40%), while partial dentures only partially
compensate for the reduced masticatory function [
28
]. On the other hand, individuals with more than
20 teeth and/or more than five posterior functional tooth units may chew a large variety of foods [8].
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 3 of 10
Tooth loss is still a common finding in older age, with wide variation between countries. The global
prevalence of edentulousness in people aged 65–74 years in upper/middle-income countries is still
high (35%) [
2
], while the mean number of remaining natural teeth is lower than 20 in most countries,
particularly in those over 75 years of age [
29
]. The rate of edentulousness in people over 65 years
in Europe ranges from 7% to 45% [
30
]. These epidemiological findings reveal that at least in higher
income countries few older people have a natural functional dentition of 20 teeth, with potential
negative implications for their chewing function if dental care has not be provided
Apart from tooth loss, other parameters of the stomatognathic system may affect masticatory
ability, such as hyposalivation and swallowing disturbances.
Hyposalivation, which is very common in old age, adversely affects masticatory function. Saliva
secretion is closely related to enabling bolus formation, sliding of food through the oesophagus,
and initiation of digestion procedures [
6
,
7
,
31
]. Saliva secretion increases when eating, and its absence
may disturb bolus preparation and swallowing [
6
]. Most authors agree that ageing per se does
not induce salivary dysfunction that is mainly related to general medical conditions (i.e., Sjögren
syndrome, depression, Parkinson’s disease, dehydration, anaemia, diabetes mellitus, etc.) and
xerostomic medications (i.e., antidepressants, antihypertensives, antihistamines, etc.) [
32
]. Another
important function of saliva is taste sensitivity [
31
], which is often impaired in older age, leading to
undernutrition and weight loss.
Swallowing problems may also impair the ability to eat the amount and quality of foods that
meet nutritional needs [
33
,
34
]. Apart from various general medical conditions, local factors such
as tooth loss and absence of dentures inhibiting masticatory ability, may disturb the execution of
smooth swallowing [
33
,
35
]. On the other hand, denture-wearing in edentulous patients may improve
swallowing function [
33
]. Alterations in the motor function of the tongue could further induce eating
and swallowing problems causing undernutrition [7,34].
Based on the existing evidence, many oral health parameters, including extensive tooth
loss without prosthetic rehabilitation, hyposalivation, swallowing disorders, and impaired tongue
movements, may impair masticatory function. Therefore, the first null hypothesis is accepted.
3. Does Poor Oral Health Affect Food Selection and Nutritional Intake?
The effect of oral factors, particularly tooth loss, on dietary preferences and nutritional intake
has been investigated in numerous cross-sectional and prospective studies using various measures
(self-administered questionnaires, oral health-related quality of life tools, Mini Nutritional Assessment
(MNA) questionnaires, haematological data, etc.).
3.1. Dental Status and Food Selection
Using patient interviews, several studies have associated tooth loss and denture-wearing with
limited consumption of specific food types such as meat, fruits and vegetables and increased
consumption of sugary products and soft easy-to-chew foods [
8
,
24
,
36
–
40
]. On the other hand, other
studies showed limited dietary restrictions related to tooth loss and chewing difficulties [41,42].
Individuals with self-perceived ill-fitting dentures had lower dietary quality scores consumed
fewer fruits and vegetables, and had a lower variety of foods in their diet as compared with participants
with 18 or more teeth [
38
]. However, those with self-perceived good fitting dentures had diets that
were not different from subjects with 18 or more teeth [
38
], indicating that successful dental treatment
may improve dietary selection. Electromyographic studies have shown that experienced denture
wearers make necessary functional adjustments to the masseter muscle neuromuscular activity in
order to chew hard food, while the role of the powerful periodontal mechanoreceptors, lost after tooth
extractions, may be taken over by other oral receptors [43].
On the other hand, food choices greatly depend on the local culture. Greeks with fewer teeth did
not exclude from their diet any food types that were difficult to eat [
41
,
42
] as compared to English
study participants [
37
]. Participants with fewer teeth or edentulous denture wearers used various
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 4 of 10
methods of food preparation which helped them to eat most food types. Such examples are mincing
the meat, cooking vegetables and greens in olive oil, boiling chicken, selecting easy-to-chew fruits
such as oranges, melons, and grapes, and cutting apples into small pieces, etc. [
41
,
42
]. Moreover, local
restaurants and family cookers prepare foods that are easy to chew for older edentate people [
44
].
Actually, older Greeks had dietary habits closer to the traditional Mediterranean diet than the younger
study participants, irrespective of their dental status, indicating the multifactorial nature of food
choices [
41
]. Likewise, middle-aged patients treated with conventional complete dentures in Canada,
while reporting some chewing difficulties for hard foods, did not exclude them from their diet [
45
].
They often cut them down into small pieces or used pureed meats or raw fruits and vegetables
instead [45].
3.2. Dental Status and Nutritional Intake
A number of cross-sectional surveys in large samples of older populations revealed that edentate
people and those with few teeth had lower nutritional intake [
8
–
12
], mainly in vitamins and dietary
fibre [
39
]. Individuals with more than 20 natural teeth consumed more of the majority of nutrients [
8
],
while denture wearers had significantly lower serum levels of vitamins C and E, beta carotene, folate,
lutein, and lycopene/zeaxanthin compared with the dentate group with more than 18 teeth [
9
].
Moreover, 22% of the variability in the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) could be explained by
dental status [11].
A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the association between oral health in
individuals older than 60 years and nutritional status has shown that malnourished people presented
0.14 less teeth on average when compared to well-nourished individuals [
46
]. However, the risk
of edentulism or using a prosthesis did not reveal any differences between malnourished and
well-nourished persons [
46
]. Other studies revealed limited or no associations between dental status
and malnutrition [47,48].
Tada and Miura [
39
] in their systematic review on the association of mastication with food and
nutrient intake in independent older adults noticed that the studies that did not reveal a positive
association between mastication and food and/or nutrient intake were carried out in developed
countries, where more processed food is consumed. The authors attributed this finding to cultural
differences between countries and the consumption of processed food [39].
Inconclusive evidence is also recorded in studies investigating the association between dental
status and body mass. Chewing difficulties may lead to lower food intake causing undernutrition
and weight loss or to chewing easy-to-chew food, rich in fat and sugars, leading to weight gain.
Data from a prospective study using data from the Survey on Health, Well-being and Aging in Brazil
(SABE), has shown that the risk of weight and waist circumference loss was higher among edentulous
community dwelling older adults than among dentate ones [
49
]. The study of Lee et al. [
50
] in older
Koreans showed that Body Mass Index (BMI) was positively associated with the number of missing
teeth in females. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) in independent adults aged 65
and over in the United Kingdom revealed that having functioning natural dentition of more than
20 teeth increased the likelihood of having a normal BMI, while having few natural teeth or being
edentulous was associated with a greater risk of being underweight or being obese [
51
]. Cultural or
methodological variation may explain these discrepancies.
A systematic review aiming to explore whether tooth loss affects dietary intake and nutritional
status, based on eight longitudinal studies, revealed contradicting results, but the quality of studies was
considered as fair (1) or poor (7) and more high-quality longitudinal studies should be designed [52].
Apart from tooth loss, other oral health parameters have also been associated with
malnourishment, such as xerostomia, and swallowing and taste difficulties [
12
,
34
,
53
]. Individuals
complaining of xerostomia were 3.49 times more likely to be malnourished than others, based on
MNA scores [
12
]. Hospitalized patients with swallowing difficulties were almost five times more
malnourished, and those with taste difficulties had 2.5 times more risk to be malnourished [53].
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 5 of 10
3.3. Oral Health and Nutritional Intake in Institutionalized Older Persons
The association of oral health with nutritional status in institutionalized older persons has
been investigated in a number of studies and was further explored through systematic reviews.
Edentulousness, chewing problems, hyposalivation, dysphagia and problems with the tongue have
been associated with weight loss, low BMI, and malnutrition [
8
,
54
,
55
]. Nutrient intake in both dentate
and edentulous older institutionalized persons in the United Kingdom was poor and similar to that of
edentulous people living in the community [8].
Most studies agree that although there is some evidence of an association between oral health
and malnutrition in nursing home residents, this strength is weaker than in community-dwelling
adults [
8
,
46
,
54
,
55
], but causality is very difficult to identify due to various confounders [
54
]. Moreover,
various methodological issues were raised, such as cross-sectional design, multiple definitions of
malnutrition, and lack of multivariate analyses [54,55].
The reason for the limited variation in nutritional intake in relation to dental status in the
institutions has been attributed to the adaptation of the diet to those with poorer masticatory
ability [
8
], and to the poor general condition of institutionalized individuals (i.e., dementia, depression,
polypharmacy, immobility, advanced age) that directly affect nutritional status [
46
]. Indeed, a
cross-sectional study in older patients with dementia did not reveal any significant associations
of dental state and chewing efficiency with nutritional state, but chewing efficiency was more strongly
associated with cognitive impairment than with tooth loss [
56
]. Cognitive decline may affect nutritional
intake and oral motor coordination, and impair the ability to maintain efficient oral hygiene and access
dental care [
14
,
16
]. Patients with dementia have poorer oral hygiene compared to healthy individuals,
fewer teeth, more dental caries, and increased prevalence of hyposalivation and taste disturbances due
to medications; they often suffer from oral dyskinesias and impaired chewing ability, affecting eating
and, in the later stages of the disease, they usually cannot use their dentures [19,33,57].
Based on the current literature, most studies recorded an association of oral factors such as tooth
loss and denture-wearing with altered dietary choices and poor nutritional status, but these findings
are not consistent. Methodological variation and the multifactorial nature of food choices may be
responsible for these inconsistencies. Even when a strong association is recorded, the causality may be
unclear due to numerous confounding factors and adverse effects, present in older people, such as
physical and mental conditions, ability for self-care, education, socioeconomic status, impaired taste
and odour, hyposalivation, impaired oral motor function, functional ability to buy and prepare food,
personal preferences, local culture, loneliness, marital status, institutionalization, ethnicity, behavioural
variables, religion, etc. [
10
–
12
,
41
,
53
,
54
,
56
]. On the other hand, malnutrition may adversely affect
the health of oral tissues. Such examples are deficiencies in vitamins A, C, E, copper, iron, zinc and
non-nutrient antioxidants that may depress anti-inflammatory and immune response of oral soft
tissues, or limited protein intake that may compromise response to infection and wound healing [
58
].
The above findings reveal that although poor dental status is associated with chewing difficulties,
its effect on food selection and nutritional intake is still open to debate. Therefore, under the limitations
of the present study, the second null hypothesis is rejected and more studies are necessary to clarify
this issue.
4. Does Prosthodontic Care Improve Nutritional Intake?
Most intervention studies did not record any significant improvement in nutritional status after
prosthetic rehabilitation of missing teeth [
39
,
59
,
60
]. One study recorded significant improvement only
using the MNA score but not its short form (MNA-SF) [61].
A number of studies have further investigated whether the type of prosthetic treatment affected
nutritional intake. They compared any variation in nutritional status between patients rehabilitated
with dental implants and those rehabilitated with conventional dentures, but again no significant
differences were recorded [
45
,
60
,
62
,
63
]. Although denture wearers had diminished masticatory ability
compared to implant patients, they did not avoid any specific food types [45].
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 6 of 10
However, when dietary consultation was offered together with prosthetic rehabilitation, dietary
habits significantly improved, irrespective of the type of prosthesis [
64
–
66
]. Bradbury et al. [
64
]
combined prosthetic treatment with dietary counselling by a nutritionist, delivering a tailored
written package to 58 edentulous patients in the United Kingdom, and 6 weeks after denture
placement recorded greater increase in fruit/vegetable consumption compared to a control group
that was not offered any dietary counselling. Likewise, in another UK study, nutritional advice
improved nutritional intake in both samples using with either conventional complete dentures
or implant-supported mandibular overdentures, with modestly better improvement in implant
patients [
65
]. An interesting finding was that dietary improvements decreased over time, indicating
that ongoing dietary intervention is needed [65].
Under the limitations of the existing evidence, prosthodontic rehabilitation alone does not
necessarily improve nutritional intake, and the third null hypothesis should be rejected. On the
other hand, it appears that dietary counselling for both patients and their caregivers along with
prosthodontic treatment may improve nutritional status.
5. The Need for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice to Improve Diet and Nutrition in
Older People
Conservative and prosthodontic dental care focusing on preservation and rehabilitation of
strategic parts of the dental arch may improve chewing efficiency and ability, helping people to
chew a large variety of foods. However, this may not be enough for improving dietary preferences
and nutritional status, due to the multifactorial nature of food choices. Dentists should include
nutritional screening and counselling during dental assessment, dental care provision, and recalls,
especially in patients -and their caregivers- with severe tooth loss, and provision of conventional or
implant-supported dentures. A further collaboration with a dietetics practitioner may be necessary to
improve diet in patients with high risk of malnutrition, particularly the frail and care dependent ones,
living in the community or in institutions.
It should be noted that a standard dental procedure after insertion of new complete dentures
is offering practical advice to patients on eating modifications to prevent their dislodgment during
function and improve functional adaptation and patient satisfaction [
67
].This advice includes: starting
with small amounts of soft food placed on both sides of the mouth and later adding harder food in
the meals; avoiding biting with the front teeth as this may dislodge the dentures; chewing with the
back teeth on both sides simultaneously; trying to eat all types of foods with the necessary preparation
(for example by cutting the meat, hard fruits, raw vegetables and salads into small pieces before eating,
well-cooking or mincing the meat, mashing vegetables and fruits, boiling or cooking raw vegetables,
moistening the bread and rusks in water before eating), trying to avoid sticky foods (white rice, white
bread, sticky sweets) that may dislodge the dentures, and trying to avoid foods containing small seeds
(e.g., sesame bagels, kiwi, tomatoes) or removing the seeds before eating, as they may get under the
dentures and cause irritation. Moreover, it is stressed that it may take some time for the stomatognathic
system to adapt to using the new appliances and be able to eat most types of food without discomfort.
On the other hand, non-dental health care providers should incorporate oral screening within
patient assessment to record any oral disease or defects in the existing prostheses that may cause eating
problems [
4
]. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recommended oral screening within nutrition
care process by dietetics practitioners, and a close collaboration with the dentist when oral health
problems are identified [58].
6. Implications for Cognitive Decline Prevention
Considering the potential beneficial influence of a healthy diet on cognitive performance, any
factors affecting dietary choices should be addressed. Good oral health, and particularly a functional
dental arch of natural or artificial teeth is important for maintaining adequate chewing efficiency
and ability, and being able to eat a large variety of healthy foods. However, it should be taken into
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 7 of 10
consideration that there is a large number of personal, socio-economic, medical, cultural and other
modifiers in food choices.
Therefore, prevention measures for good oral health throughout the lifespan, dental care provision,
when necessary, offered with tailored nutritional assessment and counselling, and systematic oral
screening during medical and dietary assessment may offer multiple health benefits.
7. Conclusions
As a healthy diet may have a beneficial effect on cognitive performance, the role of oral health,
and particularly dental status, on dietary choices is very important. Severe tooth loss and masticatory
problems partly contribute to restricted dietary choices and poor nutritional status of older adults,
due to multiple confounders. There is also increasing evidence that prosthodontic treatment when
offered with tailored nutritional advice may improve the nutritional status of patients.
The interprofessional collaboration of dental professionals, dietetics practitioners, and primary
care providers is required, incorporating oral and dietary screening in daily practice, providing dietary
advice, preventing and treating oral disease, and rehabilitating strategic parts of the dental arch to
improve chewing ability and dietary habits.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Petersen, P.E.; Yamamoto, T. Improving the oral health of older people: The approach of the WHO Global
Oral Health Programme. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2005,33, 81–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Petersen, P.E.; Kandelman, D.; Arpin, S.; Ogawa, H. Global oral health of older people-call for public health
action. Community Dent. Health 2010,27, 257–267. [PubMed]
3.
Petersen, P.E. Oral cancer prevention and control-the approach of the World Health Organization. Oral Oncol.
2009,45, 454–460. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
Kossioni, A.E.; Hajto-Bryk, J.; Maggi, S.; McKenna, G.; Petrovic, M.; Roller-Wirnsberger, R.E.; Schimmel, M.;
Tamulaitienè, M.; Vanobbergen, J.; Müller, F. An Expert Opinion from the European College of Gerodontology
and the European Geriatric Medicine Society: European Policy Recommendations on Oral Health in Older
Adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2018,66, 609–613. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Tonetti, M.; Bottenberg, P.; Conrads, G.; Eickholz, P.; Heasman, P.; Huysmans, M.C.; López, R.; Madianos, P.;
Müller, F.; Needleman, I. Dental caries and periodontal diseases in the ageing population: Call to action to
protect and enhance oral health and well-being as an essential component of healthy ageing—Consensus
report of group 4 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal
diseases. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017,44, S135–S144. [PubMed]
6.
Pedersen, A.M.; Bardow, A.; Jensen, S.B.; Nauntofte, B. Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste,
mastication, swallowing and digestion. Oral Dis. 2002,8, 117–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Laguna Cruañes, L.; Chen, J. The eating capability: Constituents and assessments. Food Qual. Prefer
2016
,
48, 345–358. [CrossRef]
8.
Sheiham, A.; Steele, J. Does the condition of the mouth and teeth affect the ability to eat certain foods,
nutrient and dietary intake and nutritional status amongst older people? Public Health Nutr.
2001
,4, 797–803.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Sahyoun, N.R.; Lin, C.L.; Krall, E. Nutritional status of the older adult is associated with dentition status.
J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2003,103, 61–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Ervin, R.B.; Dye, B.A. Number of natural and prosthetic teeth impact nutrient intakes of older adults in the
United States. Gerodontology 2012,29, e693–e702. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Cousson, P.Y.; Bessadet, M.; Nicolas, E.; Veyrune, J.L.; Lesourd, B.; Lassauzay, C. Nutritional status, dietary
intake and oral quality of life in elderly complete denture wearers. Gerodontology
2012
,29, e685–e692.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 8 of 10
12.
El Osta, N.; Hennequin, M.; Tubert-Jeannin, S.; Abboud Naaman, N.B.; El Osta, L.; Geahchan, N. The
pertinence of oral health indicators in nutritional studies in the elderly. Clin. Nutr.
2014
,33, 316–321.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
13.
Stein, P.S.; Desrosiers, M.; Donegan, S.J.; Yepes, J.F.; Kryscio, R.J. Tooth loss, dementia and neuropathology in
the Nun study. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2007,138, 1314–1322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.
Stewart, R.; Sabbah, W.; Tsakos, G.; D’Aiuto, F.; Watt, R.G. Oral health and cognitive function in the Third
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Psychosom. Med.
2008
,70, 936–941.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Lexomboon, D.; Trulsson, M.; Wårdh, I.; Parker, M.G. Chewing ability and tooth loss: Association with
cognitive impairment in an elderly population study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.
2012
,60, 1951–1956. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
16.
Batty, G.D.; Li, Q.; Huxley, R.; Zoungas, S.; Taylor, B.A.; Neal, B.; de Galan, B.; Woodward, M.; Harrap, S.B.;
Colagiuri, S. Oral disease in relation to future risk of dementia and cognitive decline: Prospective cohort
study based on the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified-Release
Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. Eur. Psychiatry 2013,28, 49–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Noble, J.M.; Scarmeas, N.; Papapanou, P.N. Poor oral health as a chronic, potentially modifiable dementia
risk factor: Review of the literature. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2013,13, 384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.
Tada, A.; Miura, H. Association between mastication and cognitive status: A systematic review. Arch. Gerontol.
Geriatr. 2017,70, 44–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.
Weijenberg, R.A.; Scherder, E.J.; Lobbezoo, F. Mastication for the mind-the relationship between mastication
and cognition in ageing and dementia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011,35, 483–497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.
Psaltopoulou, T.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Sergentanis, I.N.; Kosti, R.; Scarmeas, N.
Mediterranean diet, stroke, cognitive impairment, and depression: A meta-analysis. Ann. Neurol.
2013
,
74, 580–591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21.
Shakersain, B.; Rizzuto, D.; Wang, H.X.; Faxén-Irving, G.; Prinelli, F.; Fratiglioni, L.; Xu, W. An active lifestyle
reinforces the effect of a healthy diet on cognitive function: A population-based longitudinal study. Nutrients
2018,10, 1297. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22.
Chen, H.; Iinuma, M.; Onozuka, M.; Kubo, K.Y. Chewing maintains hippocampus-dependent cognitive
function. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2015,12, 502–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Wayler, A.H.; Chauncey, H.H. Impact of complete dentures and impaired natural dentition on masticatory
performance and food choice in healthy aging men. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1983,49, 427–433. [CrossRef]
24.
Naka, O.; Anastassiadou, V.; Pissiotis, A. Association between functional tooth units and chewing ability in
older adults: A systematic review. Gerodontology 2014,31, 166–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Witter, D.J.; van Palenstein Helderman, W.H.; Creugers, N.H.J.; Käyser, A.F. The shortened dental arch
concept and its implications for oral health care. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.
1999
,27, 249–258.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
26.
Käyser, A.F. The shortened dental arch: A therapeutic concept in reduced dentitions and certain high-risk
groups. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 1989,9, 427–450.
27.
Leake, J.L.; Hawkins, R.; Locker, D. Social and functional impact of reduced posterior dental units in older
adults. J. Oral Rehabil. 1994,21, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28.
Liang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Witter, D.J.; Wang, Y.; Creugers, N.H. Effects of removable dental prostheses on
masticatory performance of subjects with shortened dental arches: A systematic review. J. Dent.
2015
,43,
1185–1194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Kossioni, A.E. Current status and trends in oral health in community dwelling older adults: A global
perspective. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2013,11, 331–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30.
Kravitz, A.S.; Bullock, A.; Cowpe, J. Manual of Dental Practice 2014, 5th ed.; The Council of European Dentists:
Bruxelles, Belgium, 2014.
31.
Matsuo, R. Role of saliva in the maintenance of taste sensitivity. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.
2000
,11, 216–229.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
32.
Saleh, J.; Figueiredo, M.A.; Cherubini, K.; Salum, F.G. Salivary hypofunction: An update on aetiology,
diagnosis and therapeutics. Arch. Oral Biol. 2015,60, 242–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 9 of 10
33.
Furuta, M.; Komiya-Nonaka, M.; Akifusa, S.; Shimazaki, Y.; Adachi, M.; Kinoshita, T.; Kikutani, T.;
Yamashita, Y. Interrelationship of oral health status, swallowing function, nutritional status, and cognitive
ability with activities of daily living in Japanese elderly people receiving home care services due to physical
disabilities. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2013,41, 173–181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Andersson, P.; Hallberg, I.R.; Lorefält, B.; Unosson, M.; Renvert, S. Oral health problems in elderly
rehabilitation patients. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2004,2, 70–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35.
Okamoto, N.; Morikawa, M.; Yanagi, M.; Amano, N.; Tomioka, K.; Hazaki, K.; Harano, A.; Kurumatani, N.
Association of tooth loss with development of swallowing problems in community-dwelling independent
elderly population: The Fujiwara-Kyo Study. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.
2015
,70, 1548–1554. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
36.
Hildebrandt, G.H.; Dominguez, B.L.; Schork, M.A.; Loesche, W.J. Functional units, chewing, swallowing,
and food avoidance among the elderly. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997,77, 588–595. [CrossRef]
37.
Millwood, J.; Heath, M.R. Food choice by older people: The use of semi-structured interviews with open
and closed questions. Gerodontology 2000,17, 25–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38.
Sahyoun, N.R.; Krall, E. Low dietary quality among older adults with self-perceived ill-fitting dentures.
J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2003,103, 1494–1499. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39.
Tada, A.; Miura, H. Systematic review of the association of mastication with food and nutrient intake in the
independent elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2014,59, 497–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40.
Jauhiainen, L.; Männistö, S.; Ylöstalo, P.; Vehkalahti, M.; Nordblad, A.; Turunen, A.W.; Suominen, A.L.N.
Food Consumption and Nutrient Intake in Relation to Denture Use in 55- to 84-Year-Old Men and Women
-Results of a Population Based Survey. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2017,21, 492–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41.
Kossioni, A.; Bellou, O. Eating habits in older people in Greece: The role of age, dental status and chewing
difficulties. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2011,52, 197–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42.
Anastassiadou, V.; Heath, M.R. Food choices and eating difficulty among elderly edentate patients in Greece.
Gerodontology 2002,19, 17–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43.
Karkazis, H.C.; Kossioni, A.E. Surface EMG activity of the masseter muscle in denture wearers during
chewing of hard and soft food. J. Oral Rehabil. 1998,25, 8–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44.
Kossioni, A.; Bellou, O. The effect of aging and dental status on the frequency of eating out. Arch. Gerontol.
Geriatr. 2012,54, e130–e133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Muller, K.; Morais, J.; Feine, J. Nutritional and anthropometric analysis of edentulous patients wearing
implant overdentures or conventional dentures. Braz. Dent. J. 2008,19, 145–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46.
Toniazzo, M.P.; Amorim, P.S.; Muniz, F.W.M.G.; Weidlich, P. Relationship of nutritional status and oral health
in elderly: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2018,37, 824–830. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47.
Gil-Montoya, J.A.; Subirá, C.; Ramón, J.M.; González-Moles, M.A. Oral health-related quality of life and
nutritional status. J. Public Health Dent. 2008,68, 88–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48.
Liedberg, B.; Norlén, P.; Owall, B.; Stoltze, K. Masticatory and nutritional aspects on fixed and removable
partial dentures. Clin. Oral Investig. 2004,8, 11–17. [PubMed]
49.
de Andrade, F.B.; Lebrão, M.L.; de Oliveira Duarte, Y.A.; Santos, J.L. Oral health and changes in weight
and waist circumference among community-dwelling older adults in Brazil. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.
2014
,
145, 731–736. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50.
Lee, H.K.; Lee, K.D.; Merchant, A.T.; Lee, S.K.; Song, K.B.; Lee, S.G.; Choi, Y.H. More missing teeth are
associated with poorer general health in the rural Korean elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.
2010
,50, 30–33.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
51.
Sheiham, A.; Steele, J.G.; Marcenes, W.; Finch, S.; Walls, A.W. The relationship between oral health status
and Body Mass Index among older people: A national survey of older people in Great Britain. Br. Dent. J.
2002,192, 703–706. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52.
Gaewkhiew, P.; Sabbah, W.; Bernabé, E. Does tooth loss affect dietary intake and nutritional status?
A systematic review of longitudinal studies. J. Dent. 2017,67, 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Vanderwee, K.; Clays, E.; Bocquaert, I.; Gobert, M.; Folens, B.; Defloor, T. Malnutrition and associated factors
in elderly hospital patients: A Belgian cross-sectional, multi-centre study. Clin. Nutr.
2010
,29, 469–476.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 2018,10, 1709 10 of 10
54.
Tamura, B.K.; Bell, C.L.; Masaki, K.H.; Amella, E.J. Factors associated with weight loss, low BMI, and
malnutrition among nursing home patients: A systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc.
2013,14, 649–655. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55.
Van Lancker, A.; Verhaeghe, S.; Van Hecke, A.; Vanderwee, K.; Goossens, J.; Beeckman, D. The association
between malnutrition and oral health status in elderly in long-term care facilities: A systematic review. Int. J.
Nurs. Stud. 2012,49, 1568–1581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56.
Elsig, F.; Schimmel, M.; Duvernay, E.; Giannelli, S.V.; Graf, C.E.; Carlier, S.; Herrmann, F.R.; Michel, J.P.;
Gold, G.; Zekry, D. Tooth loss, chewing efficiency and cognitive impairment in geriatric patients.
Gerodontology 2015,32, 149–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Kossioni, A.E.; Kossionis, G.E.; Polychronopoulou, A. Oral health status of elderly hospitalised psychiatric
patients. Gerodontology 2012,29, 272–283. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58.
Touger-Decker, R.; Mobley, C.; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Position of the Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics: Oral health and nutrition. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet 2013,113, 693–701. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59.
Moynihan, P.J.; Butler, T.J.; Thomason, J.M.; Jepson, N.J. Nutrient intake in partially dentate patients:
The effect of prosthetic rehabilitation. J. Dent. 2000,28, 557–563. [CrossRef]
60.
Müller, F.; Duvernay, E.; Loup, A.; Vazquez, L.; Herrmann, F.R.; Schimmel, M. Implant-supported mandibular
overdentures in very old adults: A randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res.
2013
,92, 154S–160S. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
61.
McKenna, G.; Allen, P.F.; O’Mahony, D.; Cronin, M.; DaMata, C.; Woods, N. Impact of tooth replacement
on the nutritional status of partially dentate elders. Clin. Oral Investig.
2015
,19, 1991–1998. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
62.
Sebring, N.G.; Guckes, A.D.; Li, S.H.; McCarthy, G.R. Nutritional adequacy of reported intake of edentulous
subjects treated with new conventional or implant-supported mandibular dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent.
1995
,
74, 358–363. [CrossRef]
63.
Hamdan, N.M.; Gray-Donald, K.; Awad, M.A.; Johnson-Down, L.; Wollin, S.; Feine, J.S. Do implant
overdentures improve dietary intake? A randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res.
2013
,92, 146S–153S.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
64.
Bradbury, J.; Thomason, J.M.; Jepson, N.J.; Walls, A.W.; Allen, P.F.; Moynihan, P.J. Nutrition counseling
increases fruit and vegetable intake in the edentulous. J. Dent. Res.
2006
,85, 463–468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65.
Moynihan, P.J.; Elfeky, A.; Ellis, J.S.; Seal, C.J.; Hyland, R.M.; Thomason, J.M. Do implant-supported dentures
facilitate efficacy of eating more healthily? J. Dent. 2012,40, 843–850. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66.
Suzuki, H.; Kanazawa, M.; Komagamine, Y.; Iwaki, M.; Jo, A.; Amagai, N.; Minakuchi, S. The effect of new
complete denture fabrication and simplified dietary advice on nutrient intake and masticatory function of
edentulous elderly: A randomized-controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 2018,37, 1441–1447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67.
Dimitriou, P.; Zissis, A.; Karkazis, H.; Polyzois, G.; Stavrakis, G. Removable Prosthodontics. Complete Dentures,
4th ed.; Marianna Iouliou Bonisel: Athens, Greece, 2001; p. 258.
©
2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
