ArticlePDF Available

The calendar of epidemics: Seasonal cycles of infectious diseases

PLOS
PLOS Pathogens
Authors:

Figures

This content is subject to copyright.
PEARLS
The calendar of epidemics: Seasonal cycles of
infectious diseases
Micaela Elvira MartinezID*
Climate & Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia
University, New York, New York, United States of America
*mem2352@cumc.columbia.edu
Introduction
Seasonal cyclicity is a ubiquitous feature of acute infectious diseases [1] and may be a ubiqui-
tous feature of human infectious diseases in general, as illustrated in Tables 14. Each acute
infectious disease has its own seasonal window of occurrence, which, importantly, may vary
among geographic locations and differ from other diseases within the same location. Here we
explore the concept of an epidemic calendar, which is the idea that seasonality is a unifying fea-
ture of epidemic-prone diseases and, in the absence of control measures, the local calendar can
be marked by epidemics (Fig 1). A well-known example of a calendar marked by epidemics is
that of the Northern Hemisphere, where influenza outbreaks occur each winter [2,3] (hence
the colloquial reference to winter as "the flu season"). In contrast, chickenpox outbreaks peak
each spring [4,5], and polio transmission historically occurred each summer [6].
Seasonal variation in infectious disease transmission plays an important role in determining
when epidemics happen; however, it is not the sole determinant. For instance, some infectious
diseases with known seasonal transmission, such as pertussis and measles, can display multi-
annual outbreaks, meaning their epidemics occur in multi-year intervals, such as every two or
four years, rather than annually. This is because the timing of these epidemics is determined
by a combination of (i) seasonal transmission and (ii) different processes shaping the number
of susceptible individuals in the population, a sufficient number of which is a prerequisite for
an outbreak.
Within the fields of infectious disease ecology and epidemic modeling, seasonal variation in
transmission is known as seasonal forcing [78]. Over the past century, attention has been paid
to detailing the cyclicity and mechanisms of seasonal forcing for a few diseases of public inter-
est, such as measles, influenza, and cholera (e.g., see contemporary work by [3,79,80]).
Despite these notable examples, disease seasonality has yet to be systemically and/or rigorously
characterized for the majority of infections.
Here, I aim to motivate future studies of disease seasonality by drawing attention to the
importance of seasonality in public health, medicine, and biology. I will explore documented
seasonal cycles in human infections, including notifiable and neglected tropical diseases. I also
aim to present a holistic view of hypothesized drivers of seasonality for each disease, with the
caveat that, for the majority of infections, the current state of the science is insufficient to draw
conclusions about seasonal timing, seasonal magnitude, and geographic variation in incidence.
Although published data regarding disease seasonality are limited for individual diseases, col-
lectively the body of work on disease seasonality is vast and reveals that infections—which may
differ enormously in their pathology and/or ecology—coalesce via underlying seasonal drivers.
In order to explore documented seasonal cycles in human infections, the websites of the
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 1 / 15
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Martinez ME (2018) The calendar of
epidemics: Seasonal cycles of infectious diseases.
PLoS Pathog 14(11): e1007327. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327
Editor: Kimberly A. Kline, Nanyang Technological
University, SINGAPORE
Published: November 8, 2018
Copyright: ©2018 Micaela Elvira Martinez. This is
an open access article distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Funding: Research reported in this publication was
supported by the Office Of The Director, National
Institutes Of Health of the National Institutes of
Health under Award Number DP5OD023100. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors
and does not necessarily represent the official
views of the National Institutes of Health. The
funders had no role in study design, data collection
and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of
the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
(WHO), and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control were searched to com-
pile a list of 60+ communicable diseases of public health interest. Careful attention was paid to
include neglected tropical diseases that may be underrepresented in disease notification sys-
tems. For each infection, online WHO disease information pages were used to determine
whether the disease is acute or chronic. When the nature of the infection could not be estab-
lished from the WHO disease information page, this information was gathered from online
CDC disease factsheets. Google scholar was then used to systematically search for information
regarding disease seasonality. For each of the diseases, a search was conducted using "[disease
name] AND season." When needed, I also added "AND human" to the search term for zoo-
notic diseases. When searches needed to be more specific, a search for "[disease name] AND
seasonality" was conducted. Most diseases had very few papers that specifically focused on sea-
sonality (based on their titles and abstracts); the most relevant paper(s) presented in top search
results were used in Tables 14. The method employed here was meant to provide a broad
overview of many infections as opposed to detailed information regarding any individual
infection. A short description of the seasonality and hypothesized seasonal drivers were then
summarized in Tables 14.
In the broadest sense, seasonal drivers can be separated into four categories: (1) environ-
mental factors, (2) host behavior, (3) host phenology, and (4) exogenous biotic factors. These
seasonal drivers may enter into disease transmission dynamics by way of hosts, reservoirs,
and/or vectors. In surveying the literature to gauge the breadth of seasonal drivers acting upon
human infectious disease systems (Tables 14), specific seasonal drivers were found to include
(a) vector seasonality, (b) seasonality in nonhuman animal host (i.e., livestock, other domestic
animals, or wildlife), (c) seasonal climate (e.g., temperature, precipitation, etc.), (d) seasonal
nonclimatic abiotic environment (e.g., water salinity), (e) seasonal co-infection, (f) seasonal
exposure and/or behavior and/or contact rate, (g) seasonal biotic environment (e.g., algal den-
sity in waterbodies), and (h) seasonal flare-ups/symptoms and/or remission/latency.
Environmental factors
Environmental factors, specifically climate conditions, are the seasonal drivers that have
received the most attention. This may be because they often covary with seasonal disease inci-
dence. Environmental drivers are abiotic conditions that influence transmission via their
effects on hosts and/or parasites; classic examples are temperature and rainfall, which influence
a variety of infectious diseases [81], but other examples include seasonal nonclimatic abiotic
environmental conditions, such as water salinity, which may impact water-borne pathogens.
Environmental factors can impact pathogen survival during transitions between hosts. Transi-
tions can take place during short time windows (e.g., for droplet-transmitted infections) or
long time windows (e.g., for parasites with environmental life stages). In addition to their
impact on pathogens, environmental drivers can also influence host susceptibility to infection
or vector population dynamics.
As for host susceptibility, environmental conditions can impact the host immune response
and increase cells’ susceptibility to infection [82] or pose seasonal challenges (such as food lim-
itations) that leave hosts vulnerable to infection or pathology [83], which has been proposed to
influence disease progression in individuals infected with HIV [35]. For directly transmitted
infections, environmental conditions can be major drivers of cycles in incidence, with influ-
enza and cholera transmission being notable examples (e.g., see [3,80]). The effects of climate
on flu transmission have been studied using population-level data coupled with transmission
models, as well as empirical animal studies [84], to demonstrate the effects of temperature and
humidity on transmission. Although climate conditions undoubtedly play a direct role in
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 2 / 15
several directly transmitted infections, they may play a more nuanced role in vector-borne dis-
ease systems in which they modulate vector population dynamics and subsequently disease
transmission. For example, in the case of African sleeping sickness (Table 1), the rainy season
is hypothesized to modify tsetse fly distribution, which results in changes in human–tsetse fly
contact and subsequently African sleeping sickness incidence; in this case, we can classify the
seasonal driver as (1) vector seasonality alone or as (2) seasonal climate influencing vector sea-
sonality and vector seasonality having a downstream effect on seasonal exposure. Abiotic and
biotic seasonal drivers are therefore interconnected and not mutually exclusive.
Host behavior
Transmission seasonality is sometimes due to seasonal host behavior, specifically fluctuations
in transmission-relevant host contact rates throughout the year. Seasonal host behavior not
only includes seasonal behavior and/or exposure and/or contact rates in humans but also sea-
sonality in nonhuman animal hosts (i.e., livestock, other domestic animals, or wildlife). The
Table 1. Seasonal drivers of human infectious diseases. Drivers categorized as being related to (a) vector seasonality, (b) seasonality in nonhuman animal host (i.e., live-
stock, other domestic animals, or wildlife), (c) seasonal climate (e.g., temperature, precipitation, etc.), (d) seasonal nonclimatic abiotic environment (e.g., water salinity),
(e) seasonal co-infection, (f) seasonal exposure and/or behavior and/or contact rate, (g) seasonal biotic environment (e.g., algal density in waterbodies).
Infection/disease Type Seasonal
driver(s)
Description
African sleeping sickness Chronic a Tsetse fly distribution changes seasonally; expanded range during rainy season [7]
Anthrax Acute b Zoonotic disease with seasonality reported in wildlife and livestock; seasonality varies among location
and species [8]
Avian influenza Acute b Winter in both humans and poultry (in Asia) [9,10]
Bacterial Pneumonia Acute c, d, and e Peaks in midwinter (in the US); it is associated with influenza [11]
Brucellosis Acute b Spring and summer in wildlife and livestock; the timing relates to the birthing season; peaks in the
summer in humans [12]
Buruli ulcer Chronic c Varies by location; some studies have not observed seasonality [13]
Chagas disease Acute and
chronic
a Peaks in spring and summer in countries with distinct seasons [14]
Chickenpox acute f Peak in spring in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere [15]
Chikungunya Acute a Rainy season when vector density peaks. [16]
Cholera Acute c, d, and g Seasonality is stronger in countries further from the equator; outbreaks generally occur in warm months
[17]
Crimean-Congo
hemorrhagic fever
Acute a Seropositivity in livestock correlates with seasonal changes in tick parasitism; human cases correlate
with livestock seropositivity [18]
Cryptosporidium Acute c Increased risk of cryptosporidium associated with high ambient temperature and high rainfall [19]
Cutaneous leishmaniasis Acute and
chronic
a and b Strong seasonal variation with elevated incidence from October to March (in Tunisia). Seasonality may
be due to climate effects on the vector: blood-feeding sand flies [20]
Dengue fever Acute a Rainy season (in Thailand) [21]
Diphtheria Acute f Spring and summer (in Portugal) [22]
Dracunculiasis Chronic c, d, f, and g Dry season (in Nigeria) [23]
Ebola Acute b In wildlife the peak is in the dry season (in Gabon) [24]
Echinococcosis Chronic b Exposure to livestock carrying the infection is seasonal [25]
Escherichia coli
(pathogenic)
Acute b Seasonal in cattle; cattle are a source for human infection [26]
Foodborne trematodiases Chronic f Exposure is seasonal due to seasonal ingestion of infected snails [27]
Genital herpes Chronic f Elevated incidence in spring/summer and lower in winter (in the US) [28]
Gonorrhea Chronic f Peak cases in the summer and autumn (in the US) [28]
Since seasonal timing may differ among geographic areas, study location is indicated in parentheses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327.t001
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 3 / 15
most well-known example of seasonal contact rates in humans is the aggregation of children
in schools during school terms that results in elevated transmission of measles (e.g., [1]).
Recent studies of seasonal contacts include the use of innovative data sources such as light-at-
night satellite imagery and mobile phone data to infer human mobility patterns throughout
the year [48,59]. Data required to quantify seasonal variation in human contact rates are
becoming increasingly available. For zoonotic diseases, however, it is contact with wildlife or
livestock that can drive seasonal transmission, such as with anthrax, Crimean-Congo hemor-
rhagic fever, Ebola, echinococcosis, and others (Tables 14). Characterizing the seasonal inter-
face among humans and wildlife/livestock poses unique challenges, especially when contacts
are occurring in remote areas, which is likely the case with Ebola and echinococcosis (Table 1).
From an ecological perspective, wildlife systems offer a rich arena to study the diverse ways
in which behavior impacts disease transmission. Understanding transmission within wildlife
is not only relevant for zoonotic infections but is also important for conservation ecology (i.e.,
in order to protect populations from disease-induced declines, such as is currently experienced
by Tasmanian devils, North American bats, and amphibians worldwide). More broadly,
understanding the ecology of disease transmission in wildlife can lead to insights that may be
Table 2. Seasonal drivers of human infectious diseases (continued from Table 1). Drivers categorized as being related to (a) vector seasonality, (b) seasonality in non-
human animal host (i.e., livestock, other domestic animals, or wildlife), (c) seasonal climate (e.g., temperature, precipitation, etc.), (f) seasonal exposure and/or behavior
and/or contact rate, (g) seasonal biotic environment (e.g., algal density in waterbodies), (h) seasonal flare-up/symptoms and/or remission/latency, (i) observed seasonal
incidence with no hypotheses regarding drivers.
Infection/disease Type Seasonal driver
(s)
Description
Haemophilus
influenzae
Acute i Slightly elevated incidence in winter (in the US) [29]
Hepatitis A Acute f and i Dry season (in Brazil) [30,31]
Hepatitis B Chronic h Seasonality is observed with elevated levels in spring and summer and/or autumn in some parts of the world,
whereas there is lack of seasonality in other parts of the world [31,32]
Hepatitis C Acute and
chronic
f Seasonality observed in some countries and absent in others; spring and/or summer peaks in Egypt, China,
and Mexico while there is a winter peak in India [31]
Hepatitis E Acute c Waterborne outbreaks occur during the rainy season or following flooding (in China) [33]
Herpes zoster
(shingles)
Acute and
chronic
i and hHighest in August and lowest in winter (in Japan) [34]
HIV Chronic g There is some evidence to suggest there is seasonal variation in the progression to AIDS; hypothesized to be
related to seasonal nutritional deficiencies (study done in Uganda) [35]
Influenza Acute c Winter (in the Northern Hemisphere) [36]
Japanese
encephalitis
Acute a It is seasonal in the northern part of the tropical zone; outbreaks happen at the end of the rainy season, but
there is no seasonal pattern in tropical regions [37]
Lassa fever Acute c Increase in the number of Lassa fever cases during the dry season (in Nigeria) [38]
Legionellosis Acute c Peaks during hot months and particularly during humid periods (in the US) [39]
Leishmania Chronic a Transmitted by sand flies; domestic dogs are the main reservoir, and they are exposed during a discrete
transmission season [40]
Leprosy Chronic b Armadillos are the reservoir, and antibody prevalence is seasonal within them [41]
Leptospirosis Acute c Peaks when there is hot weather; usually in a rainy period (on all continents) [42]
Lyme disease Acute and
Chronic
a Peaks in summer around the time of maximal activity of the nymphal stage of the tick vector (in the US) [43]
Lymphatic filariasis Chronic a and c Transmission is intensified during the rainy season [44]
Malaria Acute a There is a spectrum of seasonal strength; some regions have strong seasonality and no seasonality in others
[45]
Since seasonal timing may differ among geographic areas, study location is indicated in parentheses.
Indicated by author.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327.t002
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 4 / 15
applied to human health. Wildlife and urban human populations exist at opposite extremes of
a continuum of exposure and/or subjection to natural environmental cycles. Due to the poten-
tially more extreme effect of natural environmental cycles on wildlife disease systems—includ-
ing climatic influences on wildlife behavior—wildlife could serve as a model for developing
methods and conceptual frameworks needed to disentangle the contribution of environmental
cycles and behavior from other drivers of disease transmission.
For example, wildlife may be a useful study system for sexually transmitted infections
(STIs). Unlike humans, who might have moderate fluctuations in sexual contacts throughout
Table 3. Seasonality of human infectious diseases (continued from Tables 1and 2). Drivers categorized as being related to (a) vector seasonality, (b) seasonality in non-
human animal host (i.e., livestock, other domestic animals, or wildlife), (c) seasonal climate (e.g., temperature, precipitation, etc.), (f) seasonal exposure and/or behavior
and/or contact rate, (g) seasonal biotic environment (e.g., algal density in waterbodies), (h) seasonal flare-up/symptoms and/or remission/latency, (i) observed seasonal
incidence with no hypotheses regarding drivers.
Infection/disease Type Seasonal
driver(s)
Description
Marburg Acute b Seasonal incidence in bat reservoirs (in Uganda); seasonal peaks coincided with the twice-annual
birthing season [46]
Measles Acute f Elevated transmission driven by aggregation of children in school; seasonality in developing countries
related to agricultural cycles [47,48]
Meningococcal disease Acute c and h Incidence varies seasonally in both tropical and temperate countries. Elevated incidence during the dry
season (in sub-Saharan Africa). [49]
MERS-CoV Acute b Introductions into humans are seasonal and are more frequent during the camel calving season. [50]
Onchocerciasis (river
blindness)
Acute and
chronic
a Higher transmission potential in the rainy season when vector abundance and infection is elevated (in
Nigeria) [51]
Pertussis Acute i and fHigher incidence June through October (in the US) [52]
Plague Acute a, b, c, f, and g The seasonality varies among countries and is dependent on seasonality of reservoir and vector species
and in some cases agricultural cycles [53]
Poliomyelitis Acute i, c, and hEpidemics occurred during the summer (in the US) [6]
Rabies Acute b Rabies is seasonal in bats, which are a source of human exposure [54]
RSV Acute i and cPeaks in winter months in temperate regions; less pronounced seasonality in the tropics [55]
Rift Valley fever Acute a and c Associated with periods of heavy rainfall [56]
Rotavirus Acute i and cGeographical gradient in seasonality; peaks in December/January in the Southwest US and April/May
in the Northeast US [57]
Rubella Acute f Two seasonal peaks in transmission per year in Kenya; late-winter to early-summer peaks in the US [58,
59]
Salmonellosis Acute i Increased number of isolates in the warm spring months (in Tunisia) [60]
Schistosomiasis Chronic b and c Transmission is seasonal; two seasonal peaks per year (in Tanzania) [61]
Scrub typhus Acute a, c, and f Seasonality depends on activity of vectors (i.e., chiggers) and humans. Seasonality varies geographically.
Some areas (in Japan) have strong seasonal transmission, and others have relatively stable transmission
[62]
Shigella Acute c Elevated incidence in summer (in Massachusetts, US) [63]
Smallpox Acute c Associated with dry weather [64]
Soil-transmitted helminth
infections
Chronic c and g Hookworms undergo seasonal arrested development, which affects the acquisition of infection in
humans; there is also seasonal acquisition of roundworm infections [65,66]
Syphilis Chronic f Higher incidence in summer (in China) [67]
Taeniasis (cysticercosis) Chronic b and f Seropositivity varies seasonally in livestock, which are the source of human infection (in Romania) [68]
Tetanus Acute c and f Peak in midsummer (in the US) [69]
Trachoma Acute and
chronic
a More common in the wet season when the fly vector is most abundant (in Australia) [70]
Since seasonal timing may differ among geographic areas, study location is indicated in parentheses.
Indicated by author.
Abbreviations: MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; RSV, Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327.t003
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 5 / 15
the year [85], in some mammal species, there is a complete absence of sexual contact (and thus
transmission) outside of the breeding season. I propose that isolation in time, such as this, is a
much more extreme form of seasonal forcing than seen in human infectious disease systems.
Isolation in time could also occur for parasites with other transmission modes, in addition to
STIs. Although it is an unexplored area of research, the study of isolation in time may reveal
pathogen metapopulation structure and parasite adaptations for surviving through transmis-
sion troughs. Discrete windows of transmission are likely to have evolutionary consequences
for parasite life history. Cattadori and colleagues [86] pointed out that, when transmission is
restricted to a short seasonal window, natural selection will favor parasites with "long-lived
infective stages." I further speculate that transmission isolated in time will have dynamical con-
sequences that make these disease systems unique from those with more continuous transmis-
sion cycles.
Sexual contact is not the only transmission-risk–elevating behavior that can display season-
ality. Seasonal engagement in risk-taking behavior may occur in other disease contexts, includ-
ing for infections transmitted during bouts of fighting. For example, the transmission of facial
tumor disease among Tasmanian devils—which is caused by an infectious cancer—is facili-
tated by aggressive behavior. During a fight, the cancer cells from a facial tumor of an infected
devil can be transferred into the wounds and mouth of a susceptible devil, resulting in infec-
tion. The Tasmanian devil contact network varies between the mating and nonmating seasons,
and this could influence the transmission of this infectious cancer [87,88]. Although mating
and aggression can elevate disease risk, it is important to acknowledge that some behaviors can
also mitigate disease risk. In wildlife, disease mitigation behaviors include grooming to remove
ectoparasites (as observed in birds and primates) and self-medication (as observed in primates,
birds, and monarch butterflies) [89,90]. There are, however, very few studies of seasonality in
risk-taking and risk-mitigation behavior. This is yet another area in which wildlife could serve
as a useful model system.
As previously noted, mobility patterns are an aspect of host behavior that can also season-
ally structure disease risk via the geographic localization of hosts. In humans, the most notable
example is the movement of people in and out of cities. In Niger, for instance, the resulting
changes in population density from migration is believed to be the primary driver of measles
Table 4. Seasonality of human infectious diseases (continued from Tables 13). Drivers categorized as being related to (a) vector seasonality, (c) seasonal climate (e.g.,
temperature, precipitation, etc.), (h) seasonal flare-up/symptoms and/or remission/latency,(i) observed seasonal incidence with no hypotheses regarding drivers.
Infection/
disease
Type Seasonal driver
(s)
Description
TB Chronic c and h Approximately 24% more TB notifications in the summer verses the winter (in the UK) [71]
Typhoid fever Acute i and cPeaks around July (in China) [72]
Viral
meningitis
Acute i Higher in the summer, when enterovirus transmission peaks (in Israel) [73]
West Nile virus Acute a and c Peaks July through August in the temperate zones of the Northern Hemisphere [74]
Yaws Chronic h More cases in the wet season; hypothesized to be due to more clinical relapse during the wet season; transmission may be
relatively constant throughout the year [75]
Yellow fever Acute a and c Seasonal changes in the distribution and density of the vector Aedes aegypti; transmission peak was historically in
autumn (in the Americas) [76]
Zika Acute a and c Seasonal changes in incidence are expected to be driven by seasonal fluctuations in the vector population (the A.aegypti
mosquito) [77]
Since seasonal timing may differ among geographic areas, study location is indicated in parentheses.
Indicated by author.
Abbreviation: TB, tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327.t004
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 6 / 15
transmission seasonality [48]. Similarly, in wildlife, hosts seasonally engage with different
aspects of their environment. For hosts that migrate or hibernate, contact with risky environ-
ments can be seasonal [91]. Migration and hibernation are part of host phenology, which has
been implicated in several infectious disease systems [9194].
Phenology
Host phenology includes host life history, annual cycles (e.g., migration and hibernation), and
endogenous circannual rhythms (i.e., endogenously driven seasonal changes in physiology)
[94]. Relevant host phenology includes, but is not limited to, seasonal changes in reproduction,
seasonal restructuring of immunity, cycles of metabolism and body condition, hibernation,
and migration. Phenology is not only a feature of hosts but also of reservoirs, vectors, and
some parasites themselves (particularly helminths). Unlike environmental drivers and host
behavior, which can affect diseases dynamics by (i) seasonally forcing transmission in hosts,
reservoirs, and vectors, phenology can drive seasonality via additional mechanisms of action,
which include the modulation of (ii) susceptible recruitment (via reproduction), (iii) suscepti-
bility to infection, (iv) infectiousness, (v) the recovery rate, (vi) the mortality rate (both natural
and disease-induced), and (vii) symptomatology and/or pathology.
Each of the seven mechanisms of action could leave a unique imprint in long-term inci-
dence data, as proposed in [94]. These mechanisms and their drivers, therefore, would have
different consequences for disease dynamics. Using models, such as that schematized in Fig 1,
statistical inference and simulation studies could be conducted to identify the dynamical
effects of various seasonal mechanisms acting in isolation and/or in combination. Simulation
studies could provide a foundation for determining the types of data required for distinguish-
ing among seasonal mechanisms and/or drivers and how factors such as resonance can influ-
ence the ability to detect seasonal drivers. For example, Martinez-Bakker and colleagues [94]
used a simulation study to demonstrate the demographic and transmission regimes under
which human birth seasonality is expected to have a meaningful impact on measles incidence
in the face of strong seasonal forcing from transmission during school terms.
This challenge of identifying seasonal drivers and their mechanisms of action becomes
greater when considering chronic infections, vector-borne diseases, and parasites with com-
plex life histories and phenology of their own. In reviewing seasonal drivers of human disease
systems for Tables 14, human phenology seemed to be particularly relevant for diseases that
have seasonal flare-ups/symptoms and/or remission/latency; this includes some chronic infec-
tious diseases, such as tuberculosis and yaws, along with Meningococcal disease, which is
acute (Tables 24). Although the study of human phenology is a relatively new research area,
phenology of vectors and nonhuman animals is well studied and could be the most common
cause of vector seasonality and seasonality in nonhuman animal hosts, which impact diseases
such as Zika (Table 4) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)
(Table 3).
Exogenous biotic factors
In addition to abiotic, behavioral, and phenological features of host–parasite systems, hosts
and their parasites are embedded within ecological communities that have additional seasonal
aspects. We can refer to biotic factors driven by ecological communities as exogenous biotic
factors because they are exogenous to any given host–parasite dyad, host–vector–parasite
triad, or multi-host system. Exogenous biotic factors include (1) interactions that take place
within hosts—specifically parasite–parasite interactions—and (2) interactions within the eco-
logical community of hosts, reservoirs, and vectors.
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 7 / 15
During some co-infections, parasite–parasite interactions can occur directly or be mediated
via the host immune system, when parasite species impact each other’s population dynamics
indirectly via their effect on the host immune system. Parasite–parasite interactions can result
in parasite fitness being elevated (i.e., facilitation) or dampened (e.g., competition) [9597].
The seasonality of individual infectious diseases likely imposes seasonal structure on co-infec-
tions and thus the presence of parasite–parasite interactions, as has been implicated in the sea-
sonality of bacterial pneumonia (Table 1).
Fig 1. Epidemic calendar. The concept of an epidemic calendar is illustrated in the top panel. Infectious diseases are
seasonal, especially the occurrence of acute and epidemic-prone diseases. In any given population, infectious diseases
are distributed throughout the year. Annual cycles of infectious disease are a ubiquitous feature of infection (Tables 1
4). The illustration depicts the wintertime seasonality of flu, springtime peaks of varicella (i.e., chickenpox), and the
summertime occurrence of gonorrhea and polio, in the Northern Hemisphere. The bottom panel is a SIR schematic for
the transmission of human infectious diseases, which include acute and chronic diseases, those that are vector-borne,
and those that are zoonotic with animal reservoirs. The vector, human, and reservoir hosts populations are partitioned
into individuals who are susceptible to infection, infected, and recovered and immune. Seasonality may enter into any of
the eight key elements of the system: (1) susceptible recruitment via reproduction, (2) transmission, (3) acquired
immunity and recovery, (4) waning immunity, (5) natural mortality, (6) symptomatology and pathology (which may be
acute or chronic, depending on the disease), (7) disease-induced mortality, and (8) cross-species transmission. Disease
illustrations reproduced from Google Medical Information. I, infected; R, recovered and immune; S, susceptible.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327.g001
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 8 / 15
Outside of the host, community ecology becomes particularly relevant for disease transmis-
sion in multi-host systems, such as Lyme disease [95,96,98]. Community ecology is particu-
larly important when there is heterogeneity in host and/or vector competence in a multi-
species disease system. This is because the abundance of competent hosts and/or vectors can
determine the transmissibility and maintenance of infection [98]. Each host and/or vector in a
vector-borne or multi-host disease system has its own set of ecological interactions (e.g., com-
petitive, commensal, parasitic, etc.) that can indirectly affect the disease of interest. The phe-
nology of hosts, reservoirs, and vectors will give rise to seasonal changes in ecological
community composition. Taken together, parasite–parasite interactions within hosts and eco-
logical interactions outside hosts undoubtedly display seasonality, as do nearly all aspects of
ecology, and this can influence the dynamics of diseases of public interest.
Understanding seasonality
Seasonality is an inherent feature of ecological systems, and seasonal incidence is a feature of
both acute and chronic infectious diseases (Tables 14). It is, therefore, important to conceptu-
alize the epidemic calendar (Fig 1) from the lens of "everything is seasonal." The utility of this
lens is that it forces us to carefully consider mechanisms behind disease seasonality, thus pre-
venting what could, in some cases, be the misleading establishment of correlative relationships
between seasonal phenomena and infectious disease incidence. Focused attention on building
theory that will provide a deeper understanding of seasonal mechanisms and learning how to
identify imprints of seasonal drivers in disease data could bring rapid advancement to the field
of disease seasonality. In general, if "everything is seasonal," then everything will covary (usu-
ally with some phase shifts). Therefore, seasonal covariance alone is not useful for establishing
seasonal drivers. Instead, long-term parallel data of potential seasonal drivers and disease inci-
dence should be confronted with mechanistic transmission models. There is evidence to sug-
gest that the information contained in interannual variation and anomalous years holds a key
to establishing causal inference of seasonal forcing [99].
A thought experiment can be used to illustrate how anomalous years and interannual varia-
tion could be used to establish causal mechanisms of disease seasonality. Let’s consider a
human disease with peak incidence in the summer, such as polio [6]. Because incidence peaks
in summer, it would have a strong positive relationship with temperature, photoperiod (day
length), and many other summer-related features of the environment and human populations.
To highlight how noncausal seasonal factors could misleadingly correlate with disease inci-
dence, we could quantify what would be a likely strong positive relationship between disease
incidence and the sale of summer-related items that have nothing to do with transmission
(e.g., bathing suit or ice cream sales). Let’s imagine we build a transmission model for this
infection and test three potential seasonal drivers (e.g., temperature, photoperiod, and bathing
suit sales). We find that all three model variants capture the seasonal structure of the epidemics
because they all contain a covariate with the necessary seasonal structure. However, if the dis-
ease displays (1) interannual variation in epidemic size and/or (2) anomalous years with differ-
ences in epidemic timing that cannot be explained by demography or susceptible recruitment
dynamics, then only the model with data from the causal driver would improve our ability to
predict the variation in incidence observed among years.
By confronting disease incidence data with transmission models and testing the relevance
of various demographic, ecological, behavioral, and physiological covariates, we could identify
potential seasonal drivers on the population level. For some seasonal drivers, such as seasonal
changes in host immunity, we would, however, still be tasked with understanding the mecha-
nism of action within the host. The effects of seasonal drivers are multi-layered. To better
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 9 / 15
understand seasonality, we must work at multiple organizational levels of science. Geophysical
factors, host population ecology, and within-host biology will need to be integrated in the prac-
tice of studying seasonality. As previously mentioned, many infectious diseases, which might
differ greatly in multiple aspects of their biology, can share the same seasonal driver(s). An
immediate way to advance the field of disease seasonality is to leverage the rich weekly and/or
monthly datasets available for notifiable diseases and combine them with models and data on
potential drivers. By coupling models and data, hypothesis testing can be done to assess sea-
sonal drivers and their modes of action. These data and models can be applied to multiple dis-
ease systems in parallel. For instance, parallel study of the seasonal drivers of (a) flu,
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), bacterial pneumonia, and pertussis, or (b) polio, typhoid,
and rotavirus, or (c) Zika, dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever would be a logical start.
Uncovering the mechanisms of seasonality for disease systems would empower the public
health community to better control infection. This sentiment was shared in 1949 by polio epi-
demiologist H. Gear, who wrote: "It must be admitted that the reasons for the seasonal inci-
dence of poliomyelitis remain obscure. When they have been elucidated perhaps much of the
epidemiology of this disease will be solved" [100].
References
1. Soper HE. The Interpretation of Periodicity in Disease Prevalence. Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society. 1929; 92(1):34–73.
2. Finkelman BS, Viboud C, Koelle K, Ferrari MJ, Bharti N, Grenfell BT. Global Patterns in Seasonal
Activity of Influenza A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B from 1997 to 2005: Viral Coexistence and Latitudinal Gra-
dients. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2(12):e1296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001296 PMID:
18074020
3. Shaman J, Pitzer VE, Viboud C, Grenfell BT, Lipsitch M. Absolute Humidity and the Seasonal Onset of
Influenza in the Continental United States. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(2):e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pbio.1000316 PMID: 20186267
4. London WP, Yorke JA. Recurrent Outbreaks of Measles, Chickenpox and Mumps: I. Seasonal Varia-
tion in Contact Rates. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1973; 98(6):453–468. PMID: 4767622
5. Bakker KM, Martinez-Bakker ME, Helm B, Stevenson TJ. Digital Epidemiology Reveals Global Child-
hood Disease Seasonality and the Effects of Immunization. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences. 2016; 113(24):6689–6694. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523941113 PMID: 27247405
6. Martinez-Bakker M, King AA, Rohani P. Unraveling the Transmission Ecology of Polio. PLoS Biol.
2015; 13(6):e1002172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002172 PMID: 26090784
7. Knight G. The Ecology of African Sleeping Sickness. Annals of the Association of American Geogra-
phers. 1971; 61(1):23–44.
8. Chikerema SM, Pfukenyi DM, Matope G, Bhebhe E. Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Cattle
Anthrax Outbreaks in Zimbabwe between 1967 and 2006. Tropical Animal Health and Production.
2012; 44(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9888-z PMID: 21701924
9. Park AW, Glass K. Dynamic Patterns of Avian and Human Influenza in East and Southeast Asia. The
Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2007; 7(8):543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70186-X
PMID: 17646027
10. Halvorson DA, Kelleher CJ, Senne DA. Epizootiology of Avian Influenza: Effect of Season on Inci-
dence in Sentinel Ducks and Domestic Turkeys in Minnesota. Applied and Environmental Microbiol-
ogy. 1985; 49(4):914–919. PMID: 4004223
11. Kim PE, Musher DM, Glezen WP, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Nahm WK, Wright CE. Association of
Invasive Pneumococcal Disease with Season, Atmospheric Conditions, Air Pollution, and the Isolation
of Respiratory Viruses. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1996; 22(1):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/
clinids/22.1.100 PMID: 8824973
12. Gul S, Khan A. Epidemiology and Epizootology of Brucellosis: A Review. Pakistan Vet J. 2007; 27
(3):145–151.
13. Merritt RW, Walker ED, Small PLC, Wallace JR, Johnson PDR, Benbow ME, et al. Ecology and Trans-
mission of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4(12):e911. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000911 PMID: 21179505
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 10 / 15
14. Zeledo
´n R. Chagas’ Disease: An Ecological Appraisal with Special Emphasis on its Insect Vectors.
Annual Review of Entomology. 1981; 26(51):101–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.
000533 PMID: 6791582
15. Bakker KM, Martinez-Bakker ME, Helm B, Stevenson TJ. Digital Epidemiology Reveals Global Child-
hood Disease Seasonality and the Effects of Immunization. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. 2016; 113(24). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523941113
PMID: 27247405
16. Pialoux G, Bernard-Alex G, Jaureguiberry S, Strobel M. Chikungunya, An Epidemic Arbovirosis. Lan-
cet Infectious Diseases. 2007; 7(5):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70107-X PMID:
17448935
17. Emch M, Feldacker C, Sirajul SM, Ali M. Seasonality of Cholera from 1974 to 2005: A Review of Global
Patterns. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2008; 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-
072X-7-1
18. Bente DA, Forrester NL, Watts DM, McAuley AJ, Whitehouse CA, Bray M. Crimean-Congo Hemor-
rhagic Fever: History, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Syndrome and Genetic Diversity. Antiviral
Research. 2013; 100(1):159–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.07.006 PMID: 23906741
19. Checkley W, White AC, Jaganath D, Arrowood MJ, Chalmers RM, Chen XM, et al. A Review of the
Global Burden, Novel Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and Vaccine Targets for Cryptosporidium. The Lan-
cet Infectious Diseases. 2015; 15(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70772-8 PMID:
25278220
20. Toumi A, Chlif S, Bettaieb J, Alaya NB, Boukthir A, Ahmadi ZE, et al. Temporal Dynamics and Impact
of Climate Factors on the Incidence of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Central Tunisia. PLoS
Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6(5):0–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001633 PMID: 22563513
21. Van Benthem BH, Vanwambeke SO, Khantikul N, Burghoorn-Maas C, Panart K, Oskam L, et al. Spa-
tial Patterns of and Risk factors for Seropositivity for Dengue Infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005; 72
(2):201–208. 72/2/201 [pii]. PMID: 15741558
22. Gomes MC, Gomes JJ, Paulo AC. Diphtheria, Pertussis and Measles in Portugal Before and After
Mass-Vaccination: A Time Series Analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology. 1999; 15(October
1966):791–798. PMID: 10608357
23. Huttly SR, Blum D, Kirkwood BR, Emeh RN, Okeke N, Ajala M, et al. The Imo State (Nigeria) Drinking
Water Supply and Sanitation Project, 2. Impact on dracunculiasis, diarrhoea and nutritional status.
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene. 1990; 84(2):316–321. https://doi.
org/10.1016/0035-9203(90)90300-4
24. Groseth A, Feldmann H, Strong JE. The Ecology of Ebola Virus. Trends in Microbiology. 2007; 15
(9):408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.08.001 PMID: 17698361
25. Eckert J, Gemmell F, Meslin X, Pawlowski Z. WHO / OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and
Animals: A Public Health Problem of Global Concern; 2001.
26. Ferens WA, Hovde CJ. Escherichia coli O157:H7: Animal Reservoir and Sources of Human Infection.
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2011; 8(4):465–87. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0673 PMID:
21117940
27. Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Intapan PM, Maleewong W, Brindley PJ. Food-Borne Trematodiases in South-
east Asia. Epidemiology, Pathology, Clinical Manifestation and Control. vol. 72. 1st ed. Elsevier Ltd.;
2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(10)72011-X.
28. Wright RA, Judson FN. Relative and Seasonal Incidences of the Sexually Transmitted Diseases. A
Two-Year Statistical Review. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1978; 54(6):433–440. https://doi.org/
10.1136/sti.54.6.433
29. Bisgard KM, Kao A, Leake J, Strebel PM, Perkins BA, Wharton M. Haemophilus Influenzae Invasive
Disease in the United States, 1994–1995: Near Disappearance of a Vaccine-Preventable Childhood
Disease. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 1998; 4(2):229–237. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0402.980210
PMID: 9621193
30. Bensabatb G, Stephen C, Soares MCP, Fiezds H, Maynard J. Epidemiological and Serological Stud-
ies of Acute Viral Hepatitis in Brazil’s Amazon Basin. paho Bulletin. 1987; 21(1):16–27.
31. Fares A. Seasonality of Hepatitis: A Review Update. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
2015; 4(1):96. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.152263 PMID: 25810997
32. Zhang SJ, Chen ZX, Jiang KP, Wu WK, Zhang CY, Gu YL. Effect of Seasonal Variation on the Clinical
Course of Chronic Hepatitis B. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006; 41(January 1996):1107–1115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1903-1 PMID: 17160522
33. Zhuang H, Cao XY, Liu CB, Wang GM. Epidemiology of Hepatitis E in China. Gastroenterologia
Japonica. 1991; 26(Suppl 3):135–8.
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 11 / 15
34. Toyama N, Shiraki K, Dermatologists, of the Society of the Miyazaki Prefecture M. Epidemiology of
Herpes Zoster and Its Relationship to Varicella in Japan: A 10-Year Survey of 48,388 Herpes Zoster
Cases in Miyazaki Prefecture. Journal of Medical Virology. 2009; 81:2053–2058. https://doi.org/10.
1002/jmv.21599 PMID: 19856466
35. Smallman-Raynor M, Cliff AD. Seasonality in Tropical AIDS: A Geographical Analysis. International
Journal of Epidemiology. 1992; 21(3).
36. Shaman J, Kohn M. Absolute Humidity Modulates Influenza Survival, Transmission, and Seasonality.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009; 106
(9):3243–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806852106 PMID: 19204283
37. Umenai T, Krzysko R, Bektimirov TA, Assaad FA. Japanese Encephalitis: Current Worldwide Status.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1985; 63(4):625–631. PMID: 3002650
38. Oldstone MB, editor. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidel-
berg; 1987. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-65848-8.
39. Fisman D, Lim S, Wellenius G, Johnson C, Britz P, Gaskins M, et al. It’s Not the Heat, It’s the Humidity:
Wet Weather Increases Legionellosis Risk in the Greater Philadelphia Metropolitan Area. The Journal
of Infectious Diseases. 2005; 192(12):2066–2073. https://doi.org/10.1086/498248 PMID: 16288369
40. Oliva G, Scalone A, Manzillo VF, Gramiccia M, Pagano A, Di Muccio T, et al. Incidence and Time
Course of Leishmania infantum Infections Examined by Parasitological, Serologic, and Nested-PCR
Techniques in a Cohort of Naive Dogs Exposed to Three Consecutive Transmission Seasons. Journal
of Clinical Microbiology. 2006; 44(4):1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.4.1318-1322.2006
PMID: 16597857
41. Truman RW, Job CK, Hastings RC, Kumaresan JA, Mcdonough CM. Seasonal and Spatial Trends in
the Detectability of Leprosy in Wild Armadillos. Epidemiology and Infection. 1991; 106(3):549–560.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800067613 PMID: 2050208
42. Romero E, Bernardo C, Yasuda P. Human Leptospirosis: A Twenty-Nine-Year Serological Study in
Sao Paulo, Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2003; 45(5):245–248.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822002000300016 PMID: 14743663
43. Piesman J, Mather TN, Dammin GJ, Telford SR, Lastavica CC, Spielman A. Seasonal Variation of
Transmission Risk of Lyme Disease and Human Babesiosis. American Journal of Epidemiology.
1987; 126(6):1187–9. PMID: 3687924
44. Lindsay S, Thomas C. Mapping and Estimating the Population at Risk. Transactions of the Royal Soci-
ety of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2000; 94(March):37–45.
45. Carneiro I, Roca-Feltrer A, Griffin JT, Smith L, Tanner M, Schellenberg JA, et al. Age-Patterns of
Malaria Vary with Severity, Transmission Intensity and Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa: A System-
atic review and Pooled Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
0008988 PMID: 20126547
46. Amman BR, Carroll Sa, Reed ZD, Sealy TK, Balinandi S, Swanepoel R, et al. Seasonal Pulses of Mar-
burg Virus Circulation in Juvenile Rousettus aegyptiacus Bats Coincide with Periods of Increased Risk
of Human Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002877 PMID:
23055920
47. Conlan AJK, Grenfell BT. Seasonality and the Persistence and Invasion of Measles. Proceedings of
the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007; 274:1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.
0030 PMID: 17327206
48. Bharti N, Tatem aJ, Ferrari MJ, Grais RF, Djibo A, Grenfell BT. Explaining Seasonal Fluctuations of
Measles in Niger Using Nighttime Lights Imagery. Science. 2011; 334(6061):1424–1427. https://doi.
org/10.1126/science.1210554 PMID: 22158822
49. Greenwood BM, Bradley AK, Blakebrough IS, Wali S, Whittle HC. Meningococcal Disease and Sea-
son in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet. 1984; 323(8390):1339–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(84)91830-0
50. Dudas G, Carvalho LM, Rambaut A, Bedford T. MERS-CoV Spillover at the Camel-Human Interface.
eLife. 2018; 7(e31257):1–37. https://doi.org/10.1101/173211
51. Atting I, Ejezie G, Braide E, Opara K, Ekwe A. Seasonal Variations in Human Onchocerciasis Trans-
mission by Black Flies (Simulium damnosum s. I.) in a Forest Area of Cross River State, Nigeria; 2005.
52. Farizo KM, Cochi SL, Zell ER, Brink EW, Wassilak SG P. Epidemiological Features of Pertussis in the
United States. Clin Infec Dis. 1992; 14(3):708–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/14.3.708
53. Ari T, Neerinckx S, Gage KL, Kreppel K, Laudisoit A, Leirs H, et al. Plague and Climate: Scales matter.
PLoS Pathog. 2011; 7(9):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002160 PMID: 21949648
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 12 / 15
54. George DB, Webb CT, Farnsworth ML, O’Shea TJ, Bowen RA, Smith DL, et al. Host and Viral Ecology
Determine Bat Rabies Seasonality and Maintenance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-
ences. 2011; 108(25):10208–10213. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010875108 PMID: 21646516
55. Bloom-Feshbach K, Alonso WJ, Charu V, Tamerius J, Simonsen L, Miller Ma, et al. Latitudinal Varia-
tions in Seasonal Activity of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV): A Global Comparative
Review. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(2):e54445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054445 PMID:
23457451
56. Linthicum KJ, Anyamba A, Tucker CJ, Kelley PW, Myers MF, Peters CJ. Climate and Satellite Indica-
tors to Forecast Rift Valley Fever Epidemics in Kenya. Science. 1999; 285(5426):397–400. PMID:
10411500
57. Turcios RM, Curns AT, Holman RC, Pandya-Smith I, LaMonte A, Bresee JS, et al. Temporal and Geo-
graphic Trends of Rotavirus Activity in the United States, 1997–2004. Pediatric Infectious Disease
Journal. 2006; 25(5):451–454. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000214987.67522.78 PMID: 16645512
58. Reef SE, Redd SB, Abernathy E, Zimmerman L, Icenogle JP. The Epidemiological Profile of Rubella
and Congenital Rubella Syndrome in the United States, 1998–2004: The Evidence for Absence of
Endemic Transmission. Clinical infectious Diseases. 2006; 43(Suppl 3):S126–S132. https://doi.org/
10.1086/505944 PMID: 16998771
59. Wesolowski A, Metcalf CJE, Eagle N, Kombich J, Grenfell BT, Bjørnstad ON, et al. Quantifying Sea-
sonal Population Fluxes Driving Rubella Transmission Dynamics using Mobile Phone Data. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112(35):11114–11119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.
1423542112 PMID: 26283349
60. Aissa RB, Al-Gallas N, Troudi H, Belhadj N, Belhadj A. Trends in Salmonella Enterica Serotypes Iso-
lated from Human, Food, Animal, and Environment in Tunisia, 1994–2004. Journal of Infection. 2007;
55(4):324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2007.06.007 PMID: 17706289
61. Mazigo HD, Nuwaha F, Kinung SM, Morona D, Moira APD, Wilson S, et al. Epidemiology and control
of human schistosomiasis in Tanzania. Parasites & Vectors. 2012; 5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/
1756-3305-5-274 PMID: 23192005
62. Watt G, Parola P. Scrub Typhus and Tropical Rickettsioses. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases.
2003; 16(5):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qco.0000092814.64370.70 PMID: 14501995
63. Naumova EN, Jagai JS, Matyas B, DeMaria A, MacNeill IB, Griffiths JK. Seasonality in Six Enterically
Transmitted Diseases and Ambient Temperature. Epidemiology and Infection. 2006; 135(2):281–292.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268806006698 PMID: 17291363
64. Nishiura H, Kashiwagi T. Smallpox and Season: Reanalysis of Historical Data. Interdisciplinary Per-
spectives on Infectious Diseases. 2009; 2009:591935. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/591935 PMID:
19266090
65. Schad AGA, Chowdhury AB, Dean CG, Kochar VK, Nawalinski TA, Tonascia JA. Arrested Develop-
ment in Human Hookworm Infections: An Adaptation to a Seasonally Unfavorable External Environ-
ment. Science. 1973; 180(4085):502–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.180.4085.502 PMID:
17817813
66. Anderson R, editor. Population Dynamics of Infectious Diseases: Theory and Applications. Edited by
Roy M. Anderson Reader in Parasite Ecology Imperial College, London University Springer-Seience-
Business Media, B.V; 1982.
67. Zhang X, Zhang T, Pei J, Liu Y, Li X, Medrano-Gracia P. Time Series Modelling of Syphilis Incidence
in China from 2005 to 2012. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
0149401 PMID: 26901682
68. Oleleu AM, Gherman CM, Blaga R, Gyorke A, Cozma V. Seroprevalence of Porcine Cysticercosis and
Influence of Some Associated Risk Factors in Northwestern Romania. Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2016; 85
(2):121–126. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201685020121
69. Heath CW, D JZM, Sherman IL. Tetanus in the United States, 1950–1960. AJPH. 1964; p. 769–779.
70. da Cruz L, Dadour IR, McAllister IL, Jackson A, Isaacs T. Seasonal Variation in Trachoma and Bush
Flies in Northwest Australian Aboriginal Communities. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2002;
30(2):80–83.
71. Koh GCKW, Hawthorne G, Turner AM, Kunst H, Dedicoat M. Tuberculosis Incidence Correlates with
Sunshine: An Ecological 28-Year Time Series Study. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(3):1–5. https://doi.org/10.
1371/journal.pone.0057752 PMID: 23483924
72. Zhang X, Liu Y, Yang M, Zhang T, Young AA, Li X. Comparative Study of Four Time Series Methods
in Forecasting Typhoid Fever Incidence in China. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0063116 PMID: 23650546
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 13 / 15
73. Levine H, Mimouni D, Zurel-Farber A, Zahavi A, Molina-Hazan V, Bar-Zeev Y, et al. Time Trends of
Viral Meningitis Among Young Adults in Israel: 1978–2012. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology
and Infectious Diseases. 2014; 33(7):1149–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2057-3 PMID:
24463724
74. Hayes EB, Komar N, Nasci RS, Montgomery SR, Leary DRO, Campbell GL. Epidemiolgy and Trans-
mission Dynamics of West Nile Virus Disease. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2005; 11(8).
75. Hackett CJ, Guthe T. Some Important Aspects of Yaws Eradication. Bulletin of the World Health Orga-
nization. 1956; 15(6):869–896. PMID: 13404465
76. Soper FL. Dynamics of Aedes aegypti Distribution and Density. Bulletin of the World Health Organiza-
tion. 1967; 36:536–538. PMID: 5299446
77. Ferguson NM, Cucunuba
´ZM, Dorigatti I, Nedjati-Gilani GL, Donnelly CA, Basa
´ñez MG, et al. Counter-
ing the Zika epidemic in Latin America. Science. 2016; 353(6297):353–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/
science.aag0219 PMID: 27417493
78. Rohani P, Earn DJ, Grenfell BT. Opposite Patterns of Synchrony in Sympatric Disease Metapopula-
tions. Science (New York, NY). 1999; 286(5441):968–71.
79. Mantilla-Beniers NB, Bjørnstad ON, Grenfell BT, Rohani P. Decreasing Stochasticity Through
Enhanced Seasonality in Measles Epidemics. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Soci-
ety. 2010; 7(46):727–39. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0317 PMID: 19828508
80. Bouma MJ, Pascual M. Seasonal and Interannual Cycles of Endemic Cholera in Bengal 1891–1940 in
Relation to Climate and Geography. Hydrobiologia. 2001; 460:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/
A:1013165215074
81. Altizer S, Dobson A, Hosseini P, Hudson P, Pascual M, Rohani P. Seasonality and the Dynamics of
Infectious Diseases. Ecology Letters. 2006; 9(4):467–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.
00879.x PMID: 16623732
82. Foxman EF, Storer Ja, Fitzgerald ME, Wasik BR, Hou L, Zhao H, et al. Temperature-Dependent
Innate Defense Against the Common Cold Virus Limits Viral Replication at Warm Temperature in
Mouse Airway Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer-
ica. 2015; 112(3):827–832. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411030112 PMID: 25561542
83. Pedersen AB, Greives TJ. The Interaction of Parasites and Resources Cause Crashes in a Wild
Mouse Population. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 2008; 77(2):370–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1365-2656.2007.01321.x PMID: 18028357
84. Lowen AC, Mubareka S, Steel J, Palese P. Influenza Virus Transmission is Dependent on Relative
Humidity and Temperature. PLoS Pathog. 2007; 3(10):1470–1476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
ppat.0030151 PMID: 17953482
85. Martinez-Bakker M, Bakker K, King AA, Rohani P. Human Birth Seasonality: Latitudinal Gradient and
Interplay with Childhood Disease Dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
2014; 281(1783).
86. Cattadori IM, Boag B, Bjørnstad ON, Cornell SJ, Hudson PJ. Peak Shift and Epidemiology in a Sea-
sonal Host-Nematode System. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2005;
272:1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.3050 PMID: 16024378
87. Hamede RK, Bashford J, McCallum H, Jones M. Contact Networks in a Wild Tasmanian Devil (Sarco-
philus harrisii) Population: Using Social Network Analysis to Reveal Seasonal Variability in Social
Behaviour and its Implications for Transmission of Devil Facial Tumour Disease. Ecology Letters.
2009; 12(11):1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01370.x PMID: 19694783
88. Bostanci A. A Devil of a Disease. Science. 2005; 307(February):2005.
89. Mooring MS, Blumstein DT, Stoner CJ. The Evolution of Parasite-defence Grooming in Ungulates.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004; 81:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.
00273.x
90. Choisy M, de Roode JC. The Ecology and Evolution of Animal Medication: Genetically Fixed
Response versus Phenotypic Plasticity. The American Naturalist. 2014;184 Suppl:S31–S46. https://
doi.org/10.1086/676928 PMID: 25061676
91. Altizer S, Bartel R, Han Ba. Animal Migration and Infectious Disease Risk. Science. 2011; 331:296–
302. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194694 PMID: 21252339
92. Langwig KE, Frick WF, Reynolds R, Parise KL, Drees KP, Hoyt JR, et al. Host and Pathogen Ecology
Drive the Seasonal Dynamics of a Fungal Disease, White-Nose Syndrome. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015; 282:20142335. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2335 PMID:
25473016
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 14 / 15
93. Hill NJ, Ma EJ, Meixell BW, Lindberg MS, Boyce WM, Runstadler JA. Transmission of Influenza
Reflects Seasonality of Wild Birds Across the Annual Cycle. Ecology Letters. 2016; 19(8):915–925.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12629 PMID: 27324078
94. Martinez-Bakker M, Helm B. The Influence of Biological Rhythms on Host-Parasite Interactions.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2015; 30(6):314–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.012
PMID: 25907430
95. Pedersen AB, Fenton A. Emphasizing the Ecology in Parasite Community Ecology. Trends in Ecology
and Evolution. 2006; 22(3):133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.005 PMID: 17137676
96. Ezenwa VO, Jolles AE. From Host Immunity to Pathogen Invasion: The Effects of Helminth Coinfec-
tion on the Dynamics of Microparasites. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2011; 51(4):540–551.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr058 PMID: 21727178
97. Cattadori IM, Boag B, Hudson PJ. Parasite Co-Infection and Interaction as Drivers of Host Heteroge-
neity. International Journal for Parasitology. 2008; 38(3–4):371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.
2007.08.004 PMID: 17936286
98. Johnson PTJ, De Roode JC, Fenton A. Why Infectious Disease Research Needs Community Ecology.
Science. 2015; 349(6252). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259504 PMID: 26339035
99. Martinez PP, King AA, Yunus M, Faruque ASG, Pascual M. Differential and Enhanced Response to
Climate Forcing in Diarrheal Disease due to Rotavirus Across a Megacity of the Developing World.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(15):4092–4097. https://doi.org/10.
1073/pnas.1518977113 PMID: 27035949
100. Gear J. The Virus of Poliomyelitis: Its Distribution and Methods of Spread. The Journal of the Royal
Sanitary Institute. 1949; 69(3):149–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/146642404906900301 PMID:
18128193
PLOS Pathogens | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327 November 8, 2018 15 / 15
... First, it is important to examine and understand a given active outbreak; second, a thorough understanding of the general theory is necessary, with the latter being the topic here. Today, the Corona Virus resides in an endemic state that is periodically disrupted by seasonal fluctuations or sudden outbreaks followed by periods of less viral activity, a behavior that is characteristic also for other resident infectious diseases, like influenza, measles and pertussis [1]. ...
... Compartmental epidemic models usually assume that individuals exposed to infective pathogens pass through different stages, typically modeled via population subclasses (compartments). Non-infected individuals remain in the susceptible class S until a contagion event happens, which moves the individual into the infected class I. Recovering from the disease, an individual usually builds-up a temporary immunity, which puts the indi-vidual into the class of recovered R. 1 Once immunity decays, individuals return to the susceptible compartment, which completes the cycle. The standard SIRS model has the forṁ ...
Article
Full-text available
Models for resident infectious diseases, like the SIRS model, may settle into an endemic state with constant numbers of susceptible ( S ), infected ( I ) and recovered ( R ) individuals, where recovered individuals attain a temporary immunity to reinfection. For many infectious pathogens, infection dynamics may also show periodic outbreaks corresponding to a limit cycle in phase space. One way to reproduce oscillations in SIRS models is to include a non-exponential dwell-time distribution in the recovered state. Here, we study a SIRS model with a step-function-like kernel for the immunity time, mapping out the model’s full phase diagram. Using the kernel series framework, we are able to identify the onset of periodic outbreaks when successively broadening the step-width. We further investigate the shape of the outbreaks, finding that broader steps cause more sinusoidal oscillations while more uniform immunity time distributions are related to sharper outbreaks occurring after extended periods of low infection activity. Our main results concern recovery distributions characterized by a single dominant timescale. We also consider recovery distributions with two timescales, which may be observed when two or more distinct recovery processes co-exist. Surprisingly, two qualitatively different limit cycles are found to be stable in this case, with only one of the two limit cycles emerging via a standard supercritical Hopf bifurcation.
... The RMSEs for the two fits are relatively large on the order of 800 to 1000, but the data ranges from 0 to 10,000 cases. There are many factors that affect influenza that have not been taken into account in this simple model and can be explored in more complex and realistic models (multiple strains, immunity, social behavior, temperature, humidity, etc.) [5,32,40,42,43] . ...
... Given the importance of seasonal and climatic variation to the fields of epidemiology and ecology, the periodic mean-reverting SDEs are under-utilized modeling tools in these fields. Seasonal trends are frequently observed in epidemic outbreaks [5,25,42] . Also, seasonal changes in the natural environment affect the growth, maturation, and diversity of plant and animal populations [36,54] . ...
... Introduction Many infectious respiratory diseases in human populations experience a seasonal variation in transmission, leading to recurring epidemics (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). The non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic constituted a major disruption of the seasonality for many endemic respiratory diseases, resulting in wide-spread changes to their usual seasonal dynamics (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). ...
... (a) Timeseries obtained from model(1). During the NPI season marked in red the maximum transmission rate β max is reduced by 30%. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Seasonal respiratory infections typically surge within a limited time window, but the exact timing within a given year is hard to predict. The disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic led to dramatic changes in the transmission dynamics of many pathogens, providing a unique opportunity to study the determinants and robustness of the seasonal timing of epidemics. Combining detailed data on acute respiratory infections from Germany with an epidemiological model, we analyzed changes in the timing of seasonal epidemics. The seasonal surge in infections occurred substantially earlier during the COVID-19 pandemic, and was reflected in a corresponding shift in the seasonality of all-cause mortality. We show that this is a consistent, but transient outcome of disrupted epidemic seasonality, predictable from basic epidemiological principles.
... Building on our previous work, which employed an autonomous ordinary differential equation model to study the dynamics of Usutu virus [18], we now extend our analysis by incorporating periodic factors to account for seasonality within host-virus interactions. While environmental factors like climatic changes and vector dynamics are known to influence transmission [19,20,21], it is equally critical to address seasonality within the host's physiological and treatment dynamics [22,23,24,25]. For instance, sea-sonal variations in immune responses and the timing of regular treatment doses can significantly impact viral replication and clearance rates. ...
Preprint
We present a mathematical model for within host viral infections that incorporates the Crowley Martin functional response, focusing on the dynamics influenced by periodic effects. This study establishes key properties of the model, including the existence, uniqueness, positivity, and boundedness of periodic orbits within the non-autonomous system. We demonstrate that the global dynamics are governed by the basic reproduction number, denoted as R0\mathcal{R}_0, which is calculated using the spectral radius of an integral operator. Our findings reveal that R0\mathcal{R}_0 serves as a threshold parameter: when R0<1\mathcal{R}_0 < 1, the virus-free periodic solution is globally asymptotically stable, indicating that the infection will die out. Conversely, if R0>1\mathcal{R}_0 > 1, at least one positive periodic solution exists, and the disease persists uniformly, with trajectories converging to a limit cycle. Additionally, we provide numerical simulations that support and illustrate our theoretical results, enhancing the understanding of threshold dynamics in within-host infection models.
... In recent years, coccidioidomycosis incidence has been rising across the southwestern USA [2], including in California, where incidence increased over eightfold between 2000 (2.5 per 1 00 000 population) [3] and 2021 (20.1 per 1 00 000 population) [4]. Coccidioidomycosis-like most infectious diseases [5][6][7]-exhibits seasonal trends in incidence, generally rising in the mid-to late summer, peaking in the autumn and winter, and returning to baseline levels in the spring months [8][9][10]. However, this pattern is variable across years, with some years displaying a seasonal rise and fall in incidence while others displaying stable high or low incidence throughout the year, and across geographies [9], with some regions displaying more consistent seasonal patterns than others, and the role of climate variability in structuring transmission seasons remains unclear [8][9][10][11][12][13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Coccidioidomycosis, an emerging fungal disease in the southwestern United States, exhibits pronounced seasonal transmission, yet the influence of current and future climate on the timing and duration of transmission seasons remains poorly understood. We developed a distributed-lag Markov state transition model to estimate the effects of temperature and precipitation on the timing of transmission season onset and end, analysing reported coccidioidomycosis cases (n = 72 125) in California from 2000 to 2023. Using G-computation substitution estimators, we examined how hypothetical changes in seasonal meteorology impact transmission season timing. Transitions from cooler, wetter conditions to hotter, drier conditions were found to significantly accelerate season onset. Dry conditions (10th percentile of precipitation) in the spring shifted season onset an average of 2.8 weeks (95% CI: 0.43–3.58) earlier compared with wet conditions (90th percentile of precipitation). Conversely, transitions back to cooler, wetter conditions hastened season end, with dry autumn conditions extending the season by an average of 0.69 weeks (95% CI: 0.37–1.41) compared with wet conditions. When dry conditions occurred in the spring and autumn, the transmission season extended by 3.70 weeks (95% CI: 1.23–4.22). With prolonged dry seasons expected in California with climate change, our findings suggest this shift will extend the period of elevated coccidioidomycosis risk.
... Seasonality is a significant factor influencing the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases, with many pathogens exhibiting distinct seasonal patterns [1][2][3][4][5]. Climate change, including shifts in temperature, rainfall, and humidity, further intensifies the complex interactions between hosts, parasites, and vectors [6,7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Seasonal variations in the incidence of infectious diseases are a well-established phenomenon, driven by factors such as climate changes, social behaviors, and ecological interactions that influence host susceptibility and transmission rates. While seasonality plays a significant role in shaping epidemiological dynamics, it is often overlooked in both empirical and theoretical studies. Incorporating seasonal parameters into mathematical models of infectious diseases is crucial for accurately capturing disease dynamics, enhancing the predictive power of these models, and developing successful control strategies. In this paper, I highlight key modeling approaches for incorporating seasonality into disease transmission, including sinusoidal functions, periodic piecewise linear functions, Fourier series expansions, Gaussian functions, and data-driven methods. These approaches are evaluated in terms of their flexibility, complexity, and ability to capture distinct seasonal patterns observed in real-world epidemics. A comparative analysis showcases the relative strengths and limitations of each method, supported by real-world examples. Additionally, a stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model with seasonal transmission is demonstrated through numerical simulations. Important outcome measures, such as the basic and instantaneous reproduction numbers and the probability of a disease outbreak derived from the branching process approximation of the Markov chain, are also presented to illustrate the impact of seasonality on disease dynamics.
... Vitamin D likely reduces the risks of many childhood viral diseases. Before the widespread use of vaccinations for childhood viral diseases, such diseases had peak seasonality in late winter and early spring; this was the case for measles [90], mumps [91], rubella [92], respiratory syncytial virus [93], and several others [94]. Winter-spring is the coldest season of the year in mid-latitudes, as well as the season of lowest absolute humidity [95] and 25(OH)D concentrations [3,96]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Vitamin D offers numerous under-recognized health benefits beyond its well-known role in musculoskeletal health. It is vital for extra-renal tissues, prenatal health, brain function, immunity, pregnancy, cancer prevention, and cardiovascular health. Existing guidelines issued by governmental and health organizations are bone-centric and largely overlook the abovementioned extra-skeletal benefits and optimal thresholds for vitamin D. In addition, they rely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which seldom show benefits due to high baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations, moderate supplementation doses, and flawed study designs. This review emphasizes the findings from prospective cohort studies showing that higher 25(OH)D concentrations reduce the risks of major diseases and mortality, including pregnancy and birth outcomes. Serum concentrations > 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) significantly lower disease and mortality risks compared to <20 ng/mL. With 25% of the U.S. population and 60% of Central Europeans having levels <20 ng/mL, concentrations should be raised above 30 ng/mL. This is achievable through daily supplementation with 2000 IU/day (50 mcg/day) of vitamin D3, which prevent diseases and deaths. Furthermore, a daily dose between 4000 and 6000 IU of vitamin D3 to achieve serum 25(OH)D levels between 40 and 70 ng/mL would provide greater protection against many adverse health outcomes. Future guidelines and recommendations should integrate the findings from observational prospective cohort studies and well-designed RCTs to improve public health and personalized care.
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed at systematically exploring the seasonalities of bacterial identifications from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2020 in hospitalized patients, considering the infectious site and the community-acquired or hospital-associated origin. Bacterial identifications were extracted from the data warehouse of the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Mediterranée Infection surveillance system, along with their epidemiological characteristics. Each species’ series was processed using a scientific workflow based on the TBATS time series model. Possible co-seasonalities were researched using seasonal peak clustering and series cross-correlations. In this study, only the 15 most frequent species were described in detail. The three most frequent species were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, with median weekly incidences of 145, 74, and 39 cases, respectively. Samplings of S. aureus and E. coli follow the same seasonal dynamics. S. aureus hospital-associated infections exhibited a significant association with temperature, humidity, and pressure change, whereas community-acquired infections were only associated with precipitations. More seasonal peaks were observed during the winter season. Among the 15 peaks of this seasonal maximum, 6.7% came from blood (Klebsiellia oxytoca) and 13.3% from respiratory specimens (E. coli and S aureus). Our results showed significant associations of periodicity between pathogens, origin of infection, type of sampling, and weather drivers.
Preprint
Full-text available
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a zoonotic virus from camels causing significant mortality and morbidity in humans in the Arabian Peninsula. The epidemiology of the virus remains poorly understood, and while case-based and seroepidemiological studies have been employed extensively throughout the epidemic, viral sequence data have not been utilised to their full potential. Here we use existing MERS-CoV sequence data to explore its phylodynamics in two of its known major hosts, humans and camels. We employ structured coalescent models to show that long-term MERS-CoV evolution occurs exclusively in camels, whereas humans act as a transient, and ultimately terminal host. By analysing the distribution of human outbreak cluster sizes and zoonotic introduction times we show that human outbreaks in the Arabian peninsula are driven by seasonally varying zoonotic transfer of viruses from camels. Without heretofore unseen evolution of host tropism, MERS-CoV is unlikely to become endemic in humans.
Article
Full-text available
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a zoonotic virus from camels causing significant mortality and morbidity in humans in the Arabian Peninsula. The epidemiology of the virus remains poorly understood, and while case-based and seroepidemiological studies have been employed extensively throughout the epidemic, viral sequence data have not been utilised to their full potential. Here, we use existing MERS-CoV sequence data to explore its phylodynamics in two of its known major hosts, humans and camels. We employ structured coalescent models to show that long-term MERS-CoV evolution occurs exclusively in camels, whereas humans act as a transient, and ultimately terminal host. By analysing the distribution of human outbreak cluster sizes and zoonotic introduction times, we show that human outbreaks in the Arabian peninsula are driven by seasonally varying zoonotic transfer of viruses from camels. Without heretofore unseen evolution of host tropism, MERS-CoV is unlikely to become endemic in humans.
Article
Full-text available
Epidemic dynamics are key and data gaps must be addressed.
Article
Full-text available
Cysticercosis is a zoonotic disease that may have a significant impact on the public health. The aim of the current study was to assess the seroprevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Northwestern Romania and the influence of several risk factors such as age, sex and season. The study included 1,288 pigs originating from 7 different counties and was conducted between May 2014 and May 2015. All pigs were reared in the traditional backyard pig system. Of these, 226 were young and 1,062 were adult pigs, 188 were males and 1,100 females. Serum samples were collected. The apDia Cysticercosis Antigen ELISA (apDia, Belgium) commercial kit was used to identify the viable cysticerci of Taenia sp. Out of the 1,288 serum samples, 83 were seropositive (seroprevalence: 6.4%). The risk factors’ analysis showed that age (3.1% juveniles vs 7.1% adults [P < 0.03]) and season (9.3% fall vs 11.8% winter [P <0.00001]; 3.4% spring vs 1.2% summer [P <0.00001]) had a significant influence on the seropositivity, while sex had no significant influence (3.7% males vs 6.9% females, P = 0.1). Considering the genus specificity of ELISA commercial kit, the serology should be correlated with the post mortem examination in order to confirm the disease and have a Cysticercus cellulosae specific prevalence. © 2016, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Influenza A Viruses (IAV) in nature must overcome shifting transmission barriers caused by the mobility of their primary host, migratory wild birds, that change throughout the annual cycle. Using a phylogenetic network of viral sequences from North American wild birds (2008-2011) we demonstrate a shift from intraspecific to interspecific transmission that along with reassortment, allows IAV to achieve viral flow across successive seasons from summer to winter. Our study supports amplification of IAV during summer breeding seeded by overwintering virus persisting locally and virus introduced from a wide range of latitudes. As birds migrate from breeding sites to lower latitudes, they become involved in transmission networks with greater connectivity to other bird species, with interspecies transmission of reassortant viruses peaking during the winter. We propose that switching transmission dynamics may be a critical strategy for pathogens that infect mobile hosts inhabiting regions with strong seasonality.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Disease surveillance systems largely focus on infectious diseases with high mortality, whereas less severe diseases often go unreported. Using chicken pox as an example, we demonstrate that Internet queries can be used as a proxy for disease incidence when reporting is lacking. We established that Google Trends accurately reflected clinical cases in countries with surveillance, and thus population-level dynamics of chicken pox. Then, we discovered robust seasonal variation in query behavior, with a striking latitudinal gradient on a global scale. Next, we showed that real-time data-mining of queries could forecast the timing and magnitude of outbreaks. Finally, our analyses revealed that countries with government-mandated vaccination programs have significantly reduced seasonality of queries, indicating vaccination efforts mitigated chicken pox outbreaks.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The infection rate of syphilis in China has increased dramatically in recent decades, becoming a serious public health concern. Early prediction of syphilis is therefore of great importance for heath planning and management. Methods: In this paper, we analyzed surveillance time series data for primary, secondary, tertiary, congenital and latent syphilis in mainland China from 2005 to 2012. Seasonality and long-term trend were explored with decomposition methods. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) was used to fit a univariate time series model of syphilis incidence. A separate multi-variable time series for each syphilis type was also tested using an autoregressive integrated moving average model with exogenous variables (ARIMAX). Results: The syphilis incidence rates have increased three-fold from 2005 to 2012. All syphilis time series showed strong seasonality and increasing long-term trend. Both ARIMA and ARIMAX models fitted and estimated syphilis incidence well. All univariate time series showed highest goodness-of-fit results with the ARIMA(0,0,1)×(0,1,1) model. Conclusion: Time series analysis was an effective tool for modelling the historical and future incidence of syphilis in China. The ARIMAX model showed superior performance than the ARIMA model for the modelling of syphilis incidence. Time series correlations existed between the models for primary, secondary, tertiary, congenital and latent syphilis.
Article
Significance Rotavirus is the most common cause of diarrhea among infants and children worldwide, and is still responsible for over 400,000 deaths per year, affecting mainly developing countries. This study investigates its transmission dynamics and their response to climate forcing, specifically flooding, in the megacity of Dhaka, Bangladesh, with an extensive surveillance record that spans over two decades and is spatially resolved. With a transmission model informed by these data, we show that consideration of different parts of the city, core and periphery, is critical to uncover important differences in seasonal outbreaks and in the effect of the monsoons. Infectious diseases not typically considered climate-sensitive can become so under demographic and environmental conditions of large urban centers of the developing world.