ArticlePDF Available

Augmented and Virtual Reality in the Language Classroom: Practical Ideas


Abstract and Figures

This article aims to provide teachers with a practical introduction to the capabilities of augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) in foreign language education. We first provide an overview of recent developments in this field and review some of the affordances of the technologies. This is followed by detailed outlines of a number of activities that teachers can use in any ESL classroom with access to smartphones or AR/VR capable devices. The article concludes with consideration of privacy concerns, and practical issues of classroom implementation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
by Euan Bonner
Kanda University of International Studies
Chiba, Japan
euan.bonner @
and Hayo Reinders
Unitec Institute of Technology
Auckland, New Zealand
hayoreinders @
This article aims to provide teachers with a practical introduction to the capabilities of
augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) in foreign language education. We first provide an
overview of recent developments in this field and review some of the affordances of the
technologies. This is followed by detailed outlines of a number of activities that teachers can
use in any ESL classroom with access to smartphones or AR/VR capable devices. The article
concludes with consideration of privacy concerns, and practical issues of classroom
Keywords: augmented reality; virtual reality; AR; VR
1. Introduction
Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR and VR) are increasingly common technologies. AR will
be familiar to most readers in the form of digital games such as the popular Pokemon Go or
travel apps such as Lonely Planet Compass City Guides. VR is most commonly associated
with headsets like Playstation VR or HTC Vive that display immersive, virtual environments
mostly used for gaming. Both technologies are constantly improving and reducing in price
seemingly with new products becoming available every day.
Besides their entertainment value, there is considerable benefit for their application in
educational settings, some of it dating back many years (such as simulations for pilots and the
training of surgeons). A number of studies have uncovered their potential in language learning
as well, including the effect of AR on increasing motivation among college students learning
English (Li and Chen, 2014; Lu, Lou, Papa & Chung, 2011), encouraging out-of-class
Spanish language use (Holden & Sykes, 2011), to helping elementary school students more
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
deeply connect with classroom topics (Gadelha, 2018) through virtual reality. However, so far
their use in language classrooms has been limited.
In this practical article we will give a brief overview of recent developments in this
area, review some of the technology’s affordances and give specific examples of how teachers
without specialised technical skills can implement AR and VR in the classroom – and support
learning beyond the classroom. We will conclude with a number of considerations around
privacy, security, socio-economic concerns and practical issues of implementation.
2. An explanation of the technology
AR, VR, and the blending of the two, called mixed or extended reality, are umbrella terms for
a range of location, motion and information technologies that enable enhancing reality with
digital resources (in the case of AR) or the creation of entirely digital environments (in the
case of VR), in which users interact with information and other users. Apps on smartphones
that can display information about nearby buildings or trigger location-sensitive media are
common examples of AR in use, while immersive 3D virtual worlds that encompass a user’s
entire field of vision using a dedicated headset are the most common type of VR experience.
VR has been used for decades in the form of flight simulators, so the technology is
certainly not new. What has changed is that what was previously expensive, highly specialised
and fixed to one location has now become cheap, available for general use and portable. This
has led to a wider adoption in a range of settings, all the way from hospitality training to
remote support of workers in dangerous environments such as in nuclear reactors and on the
An everyday application of AR that is becoming increasingly popular is the use of
AR apps that can add virtual objects into real-world physical spaces. Technicians can now
provide remote assistance using Vuforia Chalk ( by seeing a live-
view of another user’s environment and drawing on objects in the other user’s physical space
(see Figure 1). The Ikea Place app (
is another example where for the purposes of interior design users can add virtual furniture to
a real-world living room to see how it looks before purchase (see Figure 2).
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Figure 1. One user drawing into another user’s physical space.
Figure 2. Placing location-anchored virtual objects into a real room.
Wearable AR devices are rapidly becoming more affordable and more widely
available. Companies such as Aryzon ( and Myra
( focus on creating smartphone-powered devices for less than
$100USD, compared with more advanced headsets such as Microsoft Hololens
(, which currently (early 2018) retail for around
$3,000USD. As these devices become more widely adopted, the blending of physical and
digital realities will become common. The same can be said for VR, as companies move from
expensive dedicated headsets requiring powerful PCs or smartphones to smaller dedicated
headsets that do not require any additional hardware such as the Oculus Go
( and Lenovo Mirage Solo
( It is also important to mention the contributions to
accessible VR that Google has made with Google Cardboard, the simple VR device that
supports most smartphones.
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
These dramatic reductions in price and increases in availability have opened up many
more opportunities for education for both VR and AR. Examples include engineering
education, where students have been tasked with manipulating virtual objects in real-world
spaces via AR, with measurable and positive impacts on their spatial ability as a result
(Martín-Gutiérrez, Saorín, Contero, Alcañiz, Pérez-López, & Ortega, 2010). AR has also
provided educational support in history education, where learners can walk through an
environment (such as a city), see artifacts from earlier times and observe how buildings and
areas have changed over the years. YouTube’s official 360-degree video channel, via the
aforementioned cheap and widely available Google Cardboard headsets, have enabled
teachers to take their students on virtual field trips using 360-degree videos to immerse them
in diverse and informative environments. Another increasingly common use is in science
classes, where learners can carry out experiments that would otherwise be dangerous or costly
to organise. For example, students can ‘mix’ two substances to observe the effect in safe
virtual environments.
In language education, AR has been used to get students to create campus tours
(Reinders, Lakarnchua & Pegrum, 2015) or to get engaged in location-based games by
walking around a town to find clues relating to a story (Holden & Sykes, 2011). Despite these
and other interesting experimentations, it is safe to say that AR and VR have not yet in any
way been widely taken up in primary, secondary or even university level language education.
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how AR and VR can be integrated into everyday
language classrooms, without specialised technical skills. We will start by looking at some of
the potential pedagogical benefits of AR and VR in education before introducing some
practical ideas for teachers to try out.
3. The affordances of AR and VR for language education
Some of the most advantageous features of VR in classroom settings is its ability to reduce
distractions. Gadelha (2018) states that “by blocking out visual and auditory distractions in
the classroom, VR has the potential to help students deeply connect with the material” (p.40).
There are no distracting classroom windows to stare out of when students are directly
immersed into the topic they are investigating. This level of immersion also has the benefit of
helping students make real world connections between the subject matter and their own lives.
VR video content can help students make connections between the concepts they are studying
and their effects on the world (Meyer, 2016).
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
One of the principal features of AR is that it comprises a set of mobile technologies,
the affordances (potential benefits) of which for learning have long been acknowledged.
Reinders and Pegrum (2017) draw on Klopfer et al.’s (2002) list of affordances for mobile
learning and apply these to the field of language education. They discuss the benefits of
portability to support learning that is not tied to one place and that can move between formal
and informal settings (Lai, 2017). Secondly, they review the benefits of mobile technologies
for facilitating social interactivity, enabling interaction and collaborative learning, the benefits
of which for second language acquisition have long been recognised (see Chapelle 2001 and
Warschauer 1997 for discussions within the realm of technology-enhanced language
learning). Thirdly, they offer context sensitivity (they adapt to their location, for example by
displaying content in a different language), which potentially makes it easier to provide
opportunities for situated learning (Gee, 2004). Next, they offer connectivity and access to
such resources as information, teachers and other learners, which has been shown to provide
scaffolding and support experiential learning (Schwienhorst, 2012). Finally, they emphasise
individuality (devices and mobile environments can be adapted to suit an individual’s needs,
interests and so on), which can help facilitate personalised learning (Benson, 2011).
One way in which AR and VR extend mobile technologies as they are mostly used at
present is by involving the physical self in the interaction between virtuality and reality.
Rather than engaging with resources at a cognitive level only, AR and VR support
“embodied” and “extended” cognition, both of which emphasise the inextricable connection
between the mind and the environment and “cognitive activity as grounded in bodily states
and activities” (Atkinson 2010, p. 599). What these conceptions of cognition have in common
is the role of the physical world in our thinking, and, by extension, our learning. For example,
spontaneous gestures have been shown to support thinking and learning, and there is evidence
that designed gestures, as well as manipulation of objects (e.g. on a screen or in a VR
environment) can have an impact on learning (Segal, 2011). Beyond some experimental
studies (e.g. Hwang & Cho, 2012, who investigated the use of portable vibrating bracelets to
teach English intonation), there is limited research and application in the English language
classroom (for possible ideas see Reinders, 2014).
In addition, AR can encourage learners to participate actively in (co-)constructing their
learning environment, for example by posting comments or questions relating to a particular
location, uploading photos of their experiences, and so on. Because the technology assists in-
the-moment, it can support ‘just-in-time’ learning. In these ways, AR allows teachers to open
up the classroom, provide remote assistance, and design activities that bridge formal and
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
informal learning contexts. Recent studies have shown that learners appreciate the addition of
a physical element to their learning and not having to be tied to one location (Lindgen &
Johnson-Grenber, 2016).
Research into the use of AR and VR in language education is still in its infancy, with
most reports being of exploratory studies designed to investigate possibilities and student
perceptions. Some early evidence of its potential comes from Holden & Sykes (2011), who
describe the development and deployment of Mentira, a Spanish-language place-based game
in which learners are required to go out into the local (Spanish-speaking) community to obtain
information, find cues and solve quests. The authors found that engaging in out-of-class,
authentic interaction, supported by technology and scaffolded through the game-like
environment of Mentira, proved motivating to the students and showed considerable promise
for further implementation. However, they conclude by saying that the design of innovative
and meaningful learning opportunities requires more than new tools or artifacts.
In an example of a collaborative activity using AR, Reinders & Wattana (2014)
describe students at a university in Thailand developing an augmented reality campus tour for
future visitors. The real-world outcome and the physical aspect of the activity resulted in high
student motivation and interaction and the authors argue that especially in a foreign language
context this outweighed some of the additional time investment required to teach students
how to use the technology.
We encourage language teachers to engage in their own exploratory practice and
research and for this reason include a number of activities that draw on the affordances for
language learning highlighted above. The activities below are all designed to be able to be
used with minimal technical skill, and include practical activities that use AR and VR both
within and outside the language classroom.
4. Practical examples for the language classroom
To give an idea of how an AR or VR activity might work in the classroom, a sample activity
is first provided with worked-out steps for implementation. This details some of the decisions
to be made and procedures to be followed, including which tools and apps to use. This also
allows us to introduce some of the technical terms readers may not be familiar with.
Following this, we offer short explanations for a number of further, practical activities; some
supporting classroom-based study, others encouraging out-of-class learning. Each of these
activities has been developed with high-school or university age students in mind and most
are based on currently available, free and easy-to-use resources. A brief overview of the aims,
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
class time necessary and the resources that will be needed is provided and then followed by a
brief overview of how the activity can be implemented.
4.1. Creating a Campus Tour
Aims: Using English for Specific Purposes and practicing descriptive language
Class time needed: 60-80 min
Resources: Wikitude, HP Reveal, Layar or Blippar, smart devices with cameras
A relatively easy and fun way to introduce students to the affordances of AR is by having
them create and share tours of their school/institution. This could be a tour for parents, for
visitors, or for new students. This type of activity was successfully deployed by one of the
authors of this paper at a university in Thailand, where students created a tour of academic
services available to visiting professors (see above). Not only did the students enjoy the
activity a lot, the resulting product (the tour) has been useful for the university in helping
people new to the campus find their way.
First things first
The technology is not being used for its own sake, so the first step is to decide what the
activity is trying to achieve. Is it to create opportunities for students to collaborate, discuss
and negotiate? To learn to write instructional text types? Something else? Once the aim is
chosen, it is time to make sure the technology and the activities created with them achieve it.
The technology
In essence, a tour activity involves the creation of information that visitors can see by looking
at real-world objects through their cameras
. For example, they might point their camera at an
office in a building and learn that this is where IT support is offered from 08:00-17:00 six
days per week, along with links to contact details. The object that results in the display of
information is called a ‘target’ or ‘trigger’. So, in the previous example, the IT building is
what ‘triggers’ information to be displayed. The information can be anything, from text
(opening times), pictures (of the staff who work there), links (to IT help files), to videos and
so on. The act of pointing a camera at a trigger is called ‘scanning’.
At present this will involve mostly the use of smartphones, but with the advent of other devices, such as
glasses and other wearables, additional tools may be available in the near future.
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Targets or triggers do not have to be physical objects, though. They could, for instance, be
pictures of objects. As an example, students could take photos of key buildings and put them
on a poster. Visitors can then scan the pictures (the triggers) to learn what the buildings are.
To develop such materials, use an AR creation tool, such as Wikitude (
for location-based triggers, HPReveal (, Blippar ( or
Layar ( for image-based triggers. They all provide step-by-step tutorials on
how to create content and share it with others online.
Once the appropriate app has been chosen, it is time to prepare the class. Please remember
that the procedures below are an example only. How the teacher introduces the activity will
depend on the size of the class, how much pre-teaching students may need of new vocabulary,
and so on – in other words, these are general guidelines only.
1. Divide the class into an even number of small groups. Each group creates either an
academic themed (describing all academic services on campus) or a social themed tour
(describing facilities such as canteens and sports).
2. Students brainstorm interesting and informative things to say about each of the
3. Students then visit the locations and create their tour videos. They could also interview
people at the locations to get more information to talk about.
4. While at the locations, students create triggers with their AR creation tools to display
the video content. Some location-based AR services only provide services in certain
countries or areas, so in this case create image-based triggers using of any flat object
there, such as a sign or map (see Figure 3).
5. Show students how to create an account on one of the AR creation tools and how to
upload their target images and attach their tour videos to the targets.
6. Students create a video that introduces the tour locations and where to find the targets
that will start the tour videos.
7. Ask the groups to create a quiz with one question about each of the locations that can
be answered by watching the tour videos.
8. For the final part of the activity, ask the groups to find another group with a different
theme and take their tour, answering the quiz questions as they go.
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Figure 3. A photo of a university map (left) used as a trigger to activate an introduction video (right) in HP
4.2. Giving and following directions
Aims: Practicing vocabulary such as location prepositions, and giving and receiving
Class time needed: 45-60 min
Resources: Wikitude, HP Reveal, Layar or Blippar, smart devices with cameras
Students can also use the campus tour procedure above to create activities focused on giving
and receiving directions. Rather than creating videos related to the locations themselves,
students can create videos explaining how to go from one place to another. Groups of students
work their way to a common point, possibly in the form of a competition with the first team to
arrive winning. Teachers can create the directions themselves or students can work together as
a class to create a set of directions that another class would use.
4.3. More realistic presentation practice through 360-degree videos and VR
Aims: Practicing shadowing and improving presentation skill confidence
Class time needed: 20-30 min
Resources: Dedicated VR headset such as HTC Vive, mobile VR headset such as Oculus GO
or Google Cardboard with VR capable smartphone, YouTube, headphones
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Virtual Reality cameras (that take photos or film video in all directions simultaneously) and
headsets can provide users with much more immersive experiences than watching a regular
video. Online services such as YouTube’s 360-degree video library, called YouTube VR, can
take students to many different locations, providing them with a better understanding and
spatial awareness of a location before a school trip, let them experience far-away locations
and many more classroom activities.
One affordance of 360-degree videos and cheap VR headsets like Google Cardboard
is being better able to practice improving presentation skills. Until now, the most common
way students have often practiced for a presentation before a large audience has been to speak
in front of a mirror or find some quiet space to recite their speeches while imagining an
audience before them. With 360-degree videos and VR though, students can take advantage of
the large quantity of 360-degree online presentation videos to practice giving presentations in
front of actual audiences.
1. Using headphones, some mobile VR headsets, and the students’ own smartphones,
assign students a 360-degree presentation video to watch (either a suitable one found
online or one made by the teacher).
2. Encourage the students to focus their attention on the speaker and listen to what they
are saying and the gestures they use.
3. On the second viewing, students should attempt to shadow the speech given by the
speaker and, if possible, try to copy their gestures.
4. For the third viewing, ask students to face the audience while shadowing and attempt
to make eye contact with as many audience members as possible while doing so.
5. Finally, if students are preparing to give their own presentations, after the students
have practiced trying to remember as much of their own speeches as they can, have
them watch the video again, but this time mute the audio and ask them to recite their
speeches to their virtual audience.
4.4. Creating community content maps for the local area
Aims: Writing and reading reviews using target language in authentic contexts
Class time needed: 45-60 min
Resources: Google Maps, any smart device or PC
Online maps such as Google Maps ( provide opportunities to create
community content layers that appear on top of their regular maps and are shareable with
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
other people. These layers provide additional information to, for example, special locations,
user reviews, images and even directions to follow. For projects, students can design their
own layers individually or as a class. At the end of the academic year, first year students can
create map overlays that provide information to next year’s students. These overlays can
include tips on the best places to go, such as the best coffee shops in town or places to study
quietly on campus, and the fastest ways to get there, along with images and information about
each location.
A similar activity would involve prefacing this activity with field trips where students
have to go and collect information about a particular building, person or topic. This could
include going to a local museum, finding historical buildings around town, or locating (and
perhaps interviewing) a particular person.
More directly related to what is covered in class, students can be asked to tag
examples of certain vocabulary items located nearby, or even examples of the use of a
particular grammatical feature (e.g. tagging locations with reviews to practice giving
opinions). Students putting target language into use in authentic contexts such as their own
local areas has been suggested to have significant learning benefits (Kukulska-Hulme & Bull,
2009). Teachers can also create this information themselves, and provide pictures, links, tips
and even specific vocabulary items for students to study (Bo-Kristensen et al., 2009).
4.5. Location-based puzzle treasure hunts
Aims: Understanding context clues, practicing listening comprehension and procedural
Class time needed: 45-60 min
Resources: HP Reveal, Google Maps, any smart device or PC
Treasure hunts are a useful activity that can be enhanced with AR. While traditional language-
focused treasure hunts often incorporate written clues hidden at each location, AR-enhanced
treasure hunts can take advantage of the ability to also embed audio and video into the
environment. This can provide the addition of speaking and listening practice to an activity
that is traditionally focused on reading and writing.
In this activity, two teams are paired and given different instructions which they need
to share to retrieve information from around the town (this could be limited to just one
campus, for example) in order to find a hidden treasure. In order to get to the treasure,
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
students leave notes for the other team by tagging items with a recorded video that explains
where to find the next video.
A treasure hunt can also involve location sharing. Google Maps now features the
ability to let users track friends and choose whom to share their own location with
. A
variation of the treasure hunt is for one group of students to head out and for another to stay in
class, tracking the first group’s location (see Figure 4), and perhaps sending out instructions
with tasks for the group to complete over Skype ( or Google
Hangouts (
Figure 4. Users can limit who they share their location with and for how long
4.6. Providing instant-access supplementary materials for readings
Aims: Providing faster students with additional activities and slower students with additional
assistance without physically modifying materials
Class time needed: 10-20 min
Resources: HP Reveal or Layar, a scanner, smart devices with cameras
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
It is a common occurrence that some students finish an activity early while others are
struggling to keep up. One way of dealing with this is to provide learners with the option of
accessing additional information, based on their needs and/or preferences. AR services can
make it easy for teachers to provide further explanations or additional exercises. By scanning
the activity in the textbook, learners can access further resources online via links and videos
embedded into the text itself. These resources could enable students for whom the content
may be too easy to access additional tasks or more challenging questions (see Figure 5), while
simultaneously assisting struggling students with translations of key vocabulary, a summary
of a reading text, charts or diagrams to help explain difficult concepts.
Figure 5. Questions added to the bottom of a text with the relevant paragraph highlighted
To achieve this, physically scan the desired page from the textbook (using a scanner or
photocopier), convert it to a digital image and upload it to an AR service such as HP Reveal or
Layar. Once uploaded, use the website tools to place the additional information on top of the
page so that students can access it when they point their AR app cameras at the textbook
4.7. Automatically assigning roles in information gap activities
Aims: Using targeted language in a communicative environment with a focus on all members
speaking equally
Class time needed: 15-30 min
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Resources: Layar or HP Reveal, smart devices with cameras
Information gap activities (where learners are missing information they need to complete a
task and need to talk to their team members to discover it) are a popular classroom activity.
With AR, teachers have the opportunity to enhance these activities by exposing students to a
wider variety of media to discuss. AR apps such as HP Reveal and Layar can provide teachers
with the tools they need to quickly embed content such as videos, text, audio, websites and
more into any image. After finding a few images related to the topic of the information gap
activity, teachers can upload them to an AR creation tool and embed the desired content into
each one. Once the images have been printed out on paper, they can be distributed to students
who can then use their cameras to access the content and start explaining it to their group.
Some examples of information gap activities include:
Vocabulary: Presented with a paragraph of text missing key vocabulary, students have
to collect sets of nouns, action verbs and adjectives from the AR targets and work
together to place them correctly into the text.
Grammar: Each AR target displays a set of key information related to a narrative, such
as the tense, perspective, events etc. that students have to put together to understand
the full context of the story.
Pragmatics: when given a particular text type, such as a request or an apology,
students collect the key components needed to word the letter correctly, by finding and
sharing such information as the intended audience, the severity of the issue, the topic
at hand and the level of politeness needed.
Communication: each student can see some information about an object, such as a
related image, a video, an audio recording or a 3D model. By sharing what they can
see, they try and identify, for example, the purpose of the object they are looking at, or
some information about it, such as who it belongs to, or what should be done with it.
4.8. Virtual reality video creation
Aims: Providing students with new environments to express their creativity in language
production focused role-playing activities
Class time needed: 60-90 min
Resources: High-end VR Headset such as Oculus Rift and VR capable PC, projector, free
copy of Mindshow
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
For teachers with access to a high-end VR headset, asynchronous film creation programs such
as Mindshow ( can be useful in helping students express creativity in
their language production in new and exciting ways. Students can create environments and
then film themselves in it one after the other, layering each student’s movement and dialogue
onto the scene until a fully filmed, multi-actor scene is created. Students can custom-design
scenarios that are enhanced by 3D virtual realia and props and create engaging videos to
demonstrate language usage scenarios to their classmates. Airports, hotels, presentations,
news reports, job interview scenarios and more can all be made and shown in class (see
Figure 6).
Figure 6. A Mindshow news program scenario
4.9. Backchanneling with the teacher during classwork or homework
Aims: Providing ways for teachers to measure understanding and gather feedback
Class time needed: 5-15 min
Resources: Layar, HP Reveal, Google Forms, smart devices with cameras
One common challenge faced by teachers is knowing how much of the class content is being
understood. One method of monitoring student performance is backchanneling, where
teachers request responses and feedback from students at key points during the lesson to
gauge comprehension. AR opens up the ability to quickly distribute access to online
questionnaires and feedback opportunities without having to add QR codes or web links to
printed handouts. Digital image copies of handouts can be uploaded to any AR service and
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
have links to online forms embedded in them. Teachers can take entire units worth of material
and embed backchanneling opportunities into the worksheets without needing to reprint the
material with weblinks. Students simply use an AR app to point their phone cameras at the
handout and access the backchanneling material.
Some of the many backchanneling opportunities that online questionnaires enable
include presenting students with a few sentences after teaching them a new grammar point or
vocabulary item and asking them to indicate which ones are correct or incorrect. For reading
activities, comprehension questions can be administered or students can select from a list of
keywords after skimming a short article. For writing, students can choose which thesis
statement is most appropriate for a topic or place a number of essay paragraphs in order (see
Reinders, 2014 for more on backchanneling).
To create these backchanneling opportunities in the classroom, scan or take a photo of
the activities and use them as AR targets to take students to online forms where they can
answer questions and provide responses. In Layar, HP Reveal or any online AR service that
permits creating URL links from AR targets, simply create a link to a Google Form
( and change the settings as desired.
Students can also provide anonymous feedback on specific activities without teachers
needing to create multiple forms. Google Forms supports pre-filling sections of the form
automatically based on the URL used to access the form, allowing for teachers to auto-fill the
name of the activity whenever a student scans an activity with Layar or HP Reveal.
To do this in Google Forms, after creating questions for students to answer, create a
question with a short answer field such as “Which activity do you wish to talk about?” Then
go to the “More” icon (three vertical dots) in the top right and select “Get pre-filled link.”
Answer the above question in the form with the name of the activity that is going to be
augmented and then click “Submit.” Now there will be a link that can be pasted into an online
AR service, using the activity sheet/textbook page itself as a target and any time a student
points their smartphone at that target, they will be automatically sent to that Google Form
with the activity title pre-filled.
4.10. Orienting students to a reading topic through 360-degree videos
Aims: Familiarising students with a topic and providing them with vocabulary in context
Class time needed: 20-30 min
Resources: Cheap VR headsets such as Google Cardboard, student smartphones
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Many textbooks are not particularly topical and the subjects can sometimes be discussed in
very generic, impersonal terms. As a form of pre-reading or familiarizing students with a topic
before classroom discussion, use 360-degree videos in Google Cardboard or other VR
systems to fully immerse students in the subject at hand, using current resources. Check sites
such as YouTube for “360-degree (topic)” and look for content that would be suitable for
students. For example, on the topic of ‘separation’ there are some truly touching videos of the
plight of refugees (see Figure 7) that are likely to spark a reaction from students.
Once students have watched these videos, ask them to write and discuss a few
questions (Teeter, 2018):
What aspects of the video affected you the most?
What can be done to solve this problem/improve this situation?
Share your ideas with a partner.
Figure 7. The short 360-degree video “Refugees” on the refugee situation in Syria
5. Implementing VR and AR in teaching: Some considerations
Before deciding to use VR or AR, there are a number of important considerations. As with
any technical innovation there is likely to be an investment on the teacher’s as well as the
students’ part. How much time is likely needed for learning the technology and assisting
students? In addition, do students have access to capable devices? If not, could they share
between them?
In addition to these considerations, AR and VR raise important questions about
privacy and security. Along with many of the usual privacy and security issues online, VR
presents a few new issues that should not be overlooked. While online harassment is a known
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
problem in social spaces such as chat rooms or online games, VR poses new dangers.
Harassers can enter another person’s personal space and depending on the VR environment
make it difficult or even impossible for that person to retaliate by pushing the harasser away
or escaping without quitting the space altogether. In creative spaces, harassers can also
physically destroy creations and generally make use of the space impossible. As a result it is
important to make sure that students use password-protected social spaces and that the teacher
monitors the students’ interactions to avoid this becoming an issue.
One of the first concerns before asking students to use their own smartphones for these
activities is to remember that the socio-economic situations for each student are different.
Some students may not be able to afford a smartphone, or may have one with a cracked screen
that can prevent them from using VR devices such as Google Cardboard. To mitigate this
issue, it is recommended, specifically for VR, that students have a non-VR alternative
available to them. This can be accomplished by the teacher casting their own VR experience
via projector or television.
Due to AR’s ability to be used by any user with a modern smartphone, teachers should
be aware of the possible permissions that an AR app is granted when being installed on
student phones. AR Social apps may access and keep an updated history of the users
frequented locations for ad purposes, while more nefarious apps may request access to the
phone’s microphone or camera, or scan a user’s browser history or access other sensitive
content. It is important to do a background check online for each new app students are asked
to install.
Another consideration is who has access to the data that these apps produce. Students
need to be made aware of who has access to their personal information or location data when
using the apps so they can be fully aware when choosing to use them. It should also be made
clear who has access to any chat logs, questions, feedback or test data, where this data is
stored, and if possible, how to remove it.
A student should feel safe taking part in any discussion activity, expressing an opinion,
or admitting that they do not understand something, without fear of this information being
used against them in class by either their peers or teachers, or it being shared with others
outside the class.
Instructors need to be aware of pricing too when creating VR or AR activities for
classes. While some services may be free when first used, they may have limitations that can
prevent their use in the classroom. VR social spaces may require a per-user subscription fee
after the first month of use or may ask for a fee to allow a larger number of users into the
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
same space at the same time. These kinds of limitations may not become apparent or come
into effect until students are already using them in the classroom, so it is necessary to make
sure to know the parameters of the free-to-use model that the service is providing.
For AR, one needs to learn the usage limitations of free online services and whether or
not they have educator licenses available. These limitations may be there to encourage
creators to sign up for paying accounts and as such may not come into effect until a certain
number of users have viewed an AR target, or a number of free access days have passed. HP
Reveal allows publishing the target online without payment but requests a monthly fee in
exchange for additional content options and removing the need to subscribe to a creator’s
channel to activate the AR target. Services such as Blippar, Augment
(, and Layar all provide free educational licensing opportunities
for teachers.
Finally, it is still early days for VR and AR with many companies trying to establish
themselves as the best content creation service. While initially many of these companies may
provide excellent free content, eventually their start-up investments may begin to evaporate
and it can be expected that many of them will introduce more expensive price structures or
reduce their free services. This is particularly a risk if a service offers a free education service
and then finds education becoming a larger and larger part of their core user base.
Despite these challenges, it is clear that many exciting developments are taking place
in the AR and VR space. As educators, it is important to learn about these developments, their
risks, and – most importantly – their potential benefits for learning. As a way of linking
formal with informal learning spaces, there is a lot to be gained from teachers experimenting
with the many possibilities of these new technologies.
Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5),
599-622. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq009
Benson, P. (2011). Autonomy in Language Learning (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education–cases,
places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1-15. Retrieved from
Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Foundations for Teaching, Testing
and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gadelha, R. (2018). Revolutionizing Education: The promise of virtual reality. Childhood Education, 94(1), 40-
43. doi:10.1080/00094056.2018.1420362
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Gee, J. P. (2004). Learning by design: Games as learning machines. Interactive educational multimedia: IEM, 8,
15-23. Retrieved from
Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Emerging Technologies Augmented Reality and Language Learning: From annotated
vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9-19. Retrieved
Holden, C. L., & Sykes, J. M. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International
Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 1-18. doi: 10.4018/ijgbl.2011040101
Hwang, J., & Cho, K. (2012). Designing vibrotactile devices for teaching English intonation. In Proceedings of
the 6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication -
ICUIMC '12, 102, (pp. 1-4). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2184751.2184869
Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual
simulated world. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE
International Workshop on (pp. 95-98). IEEE. doi:
Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous Language Learning with Technology: Beyond the Classroom. London: Bloomsbury.
Li, S., Chen, Y., Whittinghill, D. M., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2014). A pilot study exploring augmented reality to
increase motivation of Chinese college students learning English. In ASEE Annual Conference,
Indianapolis, IN. Retrieved from
Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on
embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445-452. doi:
Lu, H. M., Lou, S. J., Papa, C., & Chung, C. C. (2011). Study on influence of adventure game on English reading
confidence, motive and self-efficacy. In International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and
Digital Entertainment (pp. 430-434). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design
and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students.
Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91. Retrieved from
Meyer, L. (2016). Students explore the earth and beyond with virtual field trips. THE Journal, 43(3), 22-25.
Retrieved from
Reinders, H. (2014). Personal Learning Environments for supporting out-of-class language learning. English
Teaching Forum, 52(4), 14. Retrieved from
Reinders, H., Lakarnchua, O., & Pegrum, M. (2015). A trade-off in learning: Mobile augmented reality for
language learning. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Contemporary Task-Based Language Teaching
in Asia, (pp. 244-256). London: Bloomsbury
Reinders, H., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Supporting language learning on the move. An evaluative framework for
mobile language learning resources. Retrieved from
Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to
communicate. Retrieved from
Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33-53,
Rizov, T., & Rizova, E. (2015). Augmented reality as a teaching tool in higher education. International Journal
of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 3(1), 7-15. Retrieved from
Schwienhorst, K. (2012). Learner Autonomy and CALL Environments. New York: Routledge.
Teeter, J. L. (2018, May). MAVR SIG Project Showcase: Academic writing from VR experiences - refugee
stories to policy in Japan. Paper session presented at PanSIG 2018, Tokyo, Japan.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language
Journal, 81(4), 470-481. Retrieved from
... Bonner and Reinders [35] examined a variety of language classes to investigate the effects of AR and VR functions. They investigated English as a Second Language courses where learning tasks were completed via CALL tools (e.g., using smartphones, AR software, and VR platforms) and pointed out potential limitations of the technology in the classroom. ...
... As seen, research on the implementation of VR-based English-language communication programs has been conducted to identify the potential of VR programs on the improvement of English communication skills. However, research on the use of VR in pedagogical contexts is still in its preliminary stage as most are exploratory studies that examine possible applicability or that investigate the students' perspectives [35]. In a similar vein, Parmaxi [38] also points out that a sound pedagogical grounding along with technical configuration of VR should be further investigated regardless of the great potential of the VR technology as a valuable tool in the field of language learning. ...
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to gather opinions from experts via the Delphi method to inform the future development of a virtual reality based English language communication program for university level students in Korea. The participants, who consisted of a panel of experts and professors who majored in English language and multimedia education, completed three Delphi surveys based on Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation, which is referred to as CIPP. In the first Delphi survey, the participants answered multiple choice questions and open-ended questions related to four areas relevant to the development of a virtual reality based program. Based on their answers, a second Delphi survey was designed to determine the participants’ level of agreement with the appropriateness of the questions related to the four areas. In the third Delphi survey, participants were shown the results (mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, consensus chart, and convergence degree) and were asked to confirm or modify their answers based on the other participants’ answers. According to the analysis of the Delphi survey results, need for the development of a virtual reality based English language communication program was suggested, and recommendations were made regarding the content and application of the program.
... Moreover, the loss of contact with the real world can induce a high degree of presence, or the illusion of being physically present in the virtual space even though it is a simulated environment (Gruber & Kaplan-Rakowski, 2020). Increased presence can lead to higher levels of engagement, learning, and attention (Bonner & Reinders, 2018;Kaplan-Rakowski & Meseberg, 2018). High-immersion VR has also been argued to benefit listening and speaking skills (Chateau et al., 2019) via collaborative learning and interaction (Bonner & Reinders, 2018;Liaw, 2019). ...
... Increased presence can lead to higher levels of engagement, learning, and attention (Bonner & Reinders, 2018;Kaplan-Rakowski & Meseberg, 2018). High-immersion VR has also been argued to benefit listening and speaking skills (Chateau et al., 2019) via collaborative learning and interaction (Bonner & Reinders, 2018;Liaw, 2019). However, there is still a need to explore learners' social interactions within VR (Liaw, 2019). ...
... 40). This shows that one of the most advantageous features of VR in teaching and learning is its ability to reduce distractions when students are rightly immersed into the subject they are investigating [9,19]. However, Akçayır and Akçayır [20] found that distraction of students' attention together with increased cognitive load and increased technology expenses and technical problems are some of the challenges faced when using VR. ...
... Bonner and Reinders [19] point out that the use of VR is still in its infancy in languageeducation research. In addition, Lin and Lan [21] state that VR is still one of the leastpublished research subjects in the technology-based learning field even though the use of VR technologies in second-language acquisition has obtained popularity [22] and has seized the growing attention of educational researchers [23]. ...
Full-text available
The advantages of employing virtual reality tours in teaching are attributed to the virtual reality experience it provides to the students. In the case of teaching popular culture, benefits from the potential of VR tour are amplified by the empirical significance that would lead to the students’ imagination and reflection. In addition, an online VR tour suggests a flexibility that allows students to learn anyplace anytime, satisfying the need for blended learning and distance learning, which is a very critical mode of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article discusses the advantages and challenges of blending “virtual reality” into the teaching of popular culture, and, furthermore, the implications of VR in tertiary education are discussed by examining the research that is conducted through the application of a VR tour in the course: Hong Kong Popular Culture. Sixty-eight students participated in the course. After implementing the VR tour, a questionnaire survey and interviews were conducted. In addition, students wrote essays to reflect on the youth culture of contemporary Hong Kong after the explanation of the tour, and these were also examined. We observed the positive responses from the students and the way in which the VR tour could enhance the learning qualities in the course on cultural studies.
... From the academic perspective, the use of VR in language learning is not a fully explored field of research [40]. Several researchers explored the affordances of these less familiar technologies where this study fills the gap by introducing a practical and tested solution [41,42]. Additionally, there is an urge for research on mobile learning to improve learners' achievement, motivation and engagement [43]. ...
Full-text available
Many studies in the literature have shown that virtual reality (VR) applications will be one of the most sought-after tools in foreign language learning. This is due to VR's capability to keep learners engaged, motivated, and prepared with better communication skills in simulated virtual environments. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing rules, it became more difficult to use and practice newly learned language speaking skills with others in-person. This paper proposes a social VR mobile application called Language SVR which presents a set of various VR environments that simulate real-life situations to learn and practice the English language. The mobile application aims to improve English speaking skills by offering a private session with a native/ fluent speaker tutor or a community of learners to practice speaking. It combines the benefits of mobile learning, social learning, and VR. Initial usability testing showed positive results. Several researchers explored the affordances of VR technology, and several existing industrial solutions lack the implementation of the Social VR concept for English language learning and practicing. This study fills the gap by introducing a practical and tested solution. It will contribute to the body of knowledge by defining the most sought-after skill by English learners, the emerging technology to satisfy the needs of language learners of this skill, and the required features needed in a social mobile VR application that address the difficulties faced by the English language learners. This paper found that applying VR technologies could contribute positively to language learning and improving learners speaking skills.
... Technology is a tool that might affect the language learners and the learning process if not directed efficiently. In the current perspective, technology is a reality, providing every student access to master a language both inside and outside the classroom (Bonner & Reinders, 2018;Kessler, 2018). Well-established technologies ended up being practically pervasive for imparting instruction in language pedagogy worldwide (Golonka et al., 2014;Levy, 2009;Selwyn, 2013;Steel & Levy, 2013), contemporary technologies, mobile devices, are progressively accessible to foster L2 learning (Godwin-Jones, 2017;Ko, 2017;Lin & Lin, 2019;Loewen et al., 2019Loewen et al., , 2020, yet other technologies, web-delivered learning platforms, virtual reality (VR) and mobile apps are still emerging (Bonk & Wiley, 2020;Parmaxi, 2020;Yang & Kuo, 2020). ...
Full-text available
The current investigation aimed to explore how and to what extent technology tools and web-delivered language learning platforms impact the academic performance of English language learners (ELLs) at the tertiary level. The study used a quantitative experimental research method employing a single-group pre-test and post-test design. A total of N=525 undergraduate computer science students partook in this research. The participants enrolled in their first semester at the Faculty of Information Technology in a private sector university in Lahore, Pakistan, were selected using a simple random sampling technique. The data were gathered in two phases: a pre-test was administered in the first week, and a post-test was conducted in the sixteenth week. The Reading Comprehension and Use of English assessments adapted from ETS TOEIC – a credible instrument in terms of validity and reliability – were used for this purpose. The investigators applied frequency analysis in the form of percentages to get various descriptive statistics. They utilised Spearman’s rank-ordered correlation and Kruskal-Wallis H tests to verify the findings of the descriptive statistics, address the research question and respond to the statistical hypotheses. Despite diverse linguistic and technological barriers, the results revealed a positive impact of technology tools on ELLs’ academic performance. The study proposed that taking undergraduates from other disciplines and exploring other variables affecting ELLs’ performance and confidence need further consideration.
... Nous FORMATIONS ▪ « Les premières formations nous ont permis de découvrir le matériel et de le manipuler ce qui a bien permis de dédramatiser sur ces nouveaux outils » ▪ « Ça permet de voir comment les scénarii peuvent être amenés avec la réalité virtuelle » ▪ « Il y a l'aspect technique qu'il faut s'approprier et ce n'est pas une évidence pour nous enseignants » ▪ « Sans aucune expérience, on ne peut pas utiliser ces outils » Nous constatons que les formations qui leur ont été proposées incarnent une étape essentielle à l'intégration d'outils de la réalité virtuelle (Bonner & Reinders, 2018) dans les salles de classe comme le confirme Al-Gamdi « the use of new technologies in a teaching process can lead to affected interactions, the distraction from tasks, and students' inability to learn a language appropriately if teachers have no required training and practice in using digital resources. » (Al-Gamdi, 2019 : 27). ...
Full-text available
Cet article se propose d'identifier certains freins et leviers à l'utilisation d'outils de la réalité virtuelle dans l'enseignement-apprentissage de l'anglais auprès de jeunes en lycées professionnels de l'Académie de Toulouse. L'étude mise en place dans le cadre d'une recherche doctorale s'intéresse aux perceptions et aux retours d'expérience de quatre enseignants. La conduite d'entretiens semi-directifs a permis de recueillir ces données. Les résultats montrent l'importance de la formation en amont et en continue des enseignants quant à l'utilisation efficace en classe de langue-ici l'anglais-de ces outils. Les enseignants mettent aussi en évidence certains écueils qui constituent des freins aux possibilités éducatives offertes par la réalité virtuelle dans l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangère. This paper constitutes an attempt to identify some of the benefits and challenges of the use of virtual reality tools in teaching and learning English in the context of vocational high school students, in the greater Toulouse school district. The study, that is part of a doctoral research project, focuses on the perceptions and feedback of four teachers. This data was collected by conducting semi-directional interviews. The results show the importance of training in the effective use of these tools in the language classroom-here English-both before implementing the tools and during a project. Teachers also pointed out some challenges that might hinder the educational potential of virtual reality in learning a foreign language.
... XR has also many social [211], societal [212], health [213], ergonomic [214], educational [215], and other issues to be solved [216,217]. In the current pandemic, people have had to the consider hygiene issues [218] of shared XR hardware. ...
Full-text available
When designing extended reality (XR) applications, it is important to consider multimodal interaction techniques, which employ several human senses simultaneously. Multimodal interaction can transform how people communicate remotely, practice for tasks, entertain themselves, process information visualizations, and make decisions based on the provided information. This scoping review summarized recent advances in multimodal interaction technologies for head-mounted display-based (HMD) XR systems. Our purpose was to provide a succinct, yet clear, insightful, and structured overview of emerging, underused multimodal technologies beyond standard video and audio for XR interaction, and to find research gaps. The review aimed to help XR practitioners to apply multimodal interaction techniques and interaction researchers to direct future efforts towards relevant issues on multimodal XR. We conclude with our perspective on promising research avenues for multimodal interaction technologies.
Full-text available
Academic blog written for Immerse. Please cite as: Kern, N. (2021, February 25). Why Interaction in Virtual Reality Matters. The Immerse Blog.
Despite making headway in the entertainment sector, extended reality (XR) remains an experimental technology in many educational contexts. This chapter moves to enrich the understanding of XR for language researchers and educators with a review of the most current established theories, frameworks, and research. An exploration of recommended avenues for future research from recently published articles in VR for education will be discussed to provide readers with an outline of the current research conditions and suggested ways forward. The chapter concludes with an inspection of language learners' experiences using a high-immersion VR system for the purposes of learning paragraph structure. Trends in VR education and research point towards increasingly sustainable applications of the technology in the classroom with identified linguistic and affective benefits. As VR continues to evolve and its applications in language learning become more sophisticated, educators and researchers will need to stay acquainted with the prevailing usages. This chapter aims to assist in that endeavor.
The 2021 EUROCALL conference engaged just under 250 speakers from 40 different countries. Cnam Paris and Sorbonne Université joined forces to host and organise the event despite the challenging context due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Originally programmed to be held on site in the heart of Paris, France, the EUROCALL organising team and executive committee agreed to opt for a blended and then for a fully online conference. The theme of the 2021 EUROCALL conference was “CALL & Professionalisation”. This volume, a selection of 54 short papers by some of the EUROCALL 2021 presenters, offers a combination of research studies as well as practical examples fairly representative of the theme of the conference.
Full-text available
Out-of-class exposure to and use of the target language mediated by technological resources are essential to language learning, as foreign language learners very often encounter difficulty in accessing and processing target language in the immediate physical environments. Understanding how foreign language learners’ out-of-class self-directed technology-enhanced language learning experience interacts with their learning beliefs helps inform educators of how these learners could be supported to take advantage of technological resources to enrich language learning. Interview responses from 20 undergraduate foreign language learners at a university in Hong Kong were elicited to shed light on the issue. It was found that learners’ language learning beliefs and technological behaviors had a two-way cyclical interaction, and the interaction was manifested in both the nature of technological resources these learners used and the way they interacted with the resources. Furthermore, the interaction between the two was context-dependent and subject to the influence of the characteristics of self-directed out-of-class technology-enhanced language learning and associated self-concept and affective factors. The study calls for a contextualized and systemic approach towards supporting foreign language learners’ autonomous technology-enhanced language learning beyond the classroom.
Full-text available
Personal Learning Environment (PLE) is a learner- controlled environment for language learning. More specifically, it is a combination of tools (usually digital) and resources chosen by the learner to support different aspects of the learning process, from goal setting to materials selection to assessment. The importance of PLEs for teachers lies in their ability to help students develop autonomy and prepare them for lifelong learning. New technologies are making the creation of PLEs easier and their use more effective. Although PLEs can be created without the aid of technology, in this article I will consider their use mostly in the context of online resources. I will also discuss PLEs’ use for language learning and look at ways in which teachers can use them to help students take responsibility for their own learning.
Full-text available
This paper reports on a study into the effects of digital game play on learners' Willingness to Communicate (WTC), or individuals' "readiness to enter into discourse at a particular time with a specific person or persons, using a L2" (MacIntyre, Dörnyei, Clément, & Noels, 1998, p. 547). Thirty Thai learners of English as a foreign language enrolled in a University language course completed six 90-minute lessons playing Ragnarok Online, a popular online role-playing game. The game had been installed on a private server and was thus only available to participants in the study. We modified the game to include special instructions, or quests (missions that players are assigned to accomplish in order to get items and progress throughout the game), designed to encourage collaboration and communication. To gauge participants' WTC, a series of questionnaires was designed, adapted from MacIntyre et al's (2001) WTC scale and previous studies on language and communication anxiety (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; McCroskey & Richmond, 1982) and perceived competence (Compton, 2004; MacIntyre & Charos, 1996). These asked respondents about their (own perceptions of their) willingness to use English, as well as their confidence, anxiety, and perceived communicative competence in communicating in English. The questionnaires were administered at the start of the course, and again after six gaming sessions. Results on the first set of questionnaires showed that students had low confidence, high anxiety, low perceived competence, and low WTC. The second set of results showed a marked and significant improvement, with participants feeling more confident, less anxious, more competent, and more willing to communicate. We argue that the careful construction of tasks that draw on the affordances of games can have a positive effect on the language learning process.
Technology can help us ensure access to education, and some of the newest technologies offer the flexibility to engage learners of all types.
This volume brings together two prominent strands in second language acquisition theory and research: the concept of learner autonomy and computer-assisted language learning (CALL). Learner autonomy supports learners in becoming more reflective and communicative and in experimenting with language and language learning. CALL environments offer more and qualitatively different opportunities for learner autonomy than the traditional language classroom. This book offers researchers a starting point into researching learner autonomy in CALL contexts and offers teachers practical advice on chances and pitfalls in realizing learner autonomy goals in the CALL-supported classroom.
Rapid development of the technology has influenced its inevitable entrance in the learning processes. Teachers are often challenged to use the appropriate educational technology in the process of teaching in order to ease the learning process of students. Introducing new technology in the teaching process should utilize the new technology in any possible way in order to assist the teacher in transferring the knowledge and assist the students in grasping that knowledge. This paper should emphasize the benefits of using augmented reality in higher education, by measuring outcomes of the students which used augmented reality as a teaching tool in the courses. Results from the survey imply that students show significantly improved results in increasing the interest, understanding and interiorizing the learning material. University teachers found that using augmented reality is significantly improving the learning process of students and their teaching process in a pedagogical and technical sense.
The authors describe an emerging paradigm of educational research that pairs theories of embodied learning with a class of immersive technologies referred to as mixed reality (MR). MR environments merge the digital with the physical, where, for example, students can use their bodies to simulate an orbit around a virtual planet. Recent research supports the idea that body activity can be an important catalyst for generating learning, and new technologies are being developed that use natural human physicality and gesture as input. However, existing research on embodied learning technologies has been disparate, driven largely by specific technical innovations and constraints, and often lacking a clear focus on establishing their efficacy in educational contexts. On the basis of the unique characteristics of these technologies and on their own experiences conducting research in this area, the authors put forth six precepts for embodied learning technology researchers that pertain to the rationale, design, and execution of empirical studies.