ArticlePDF Available

Framing the Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of Arabic and English News Sources



The mass exodus of millions of Syrians from their country due to worsening war conditions has become a serious global humanitarian crisis. As the number of displaced refugees rises, so does the number of those living in inhuman conditions. This content analysis examines how popular news discourses shape the geopolitics of the Syrian refugee crisis. We use framing theory to explore the main frames that emerged in a comparison of 10 Arabic news sources with seven English news sources in their coverage of the crisis. Based on a systematic random sample, 278 Arabic news stories and 210 English news stories were selected for further analysis. Qualitative data analysis software was used to code and analyze the content of news stories at the article and sentence levels. Four main frames emerged from the analysis: border, institutional, victim, and war frames. Although the border frame was popular across all news sources, English sources were more likely than Arabic sources to use the victim frame and less likely to use the war frame. Implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.
International Journal of Communication 12(2018), 44884506 19328036/20180005
Copyright © 2018 (Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles). Licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at
Framing the Syrian Refugee Crisis:
A Comparative Analysis of Arabic and English News Sources
Texas A&M University, USA
Texas A&M University, USA
The mass exodus of millions of Syrians from their country due to worsening war
conditions has become a serious global humanitarian crisis. As the number of displaced
refugees rises, so does the number of those living in inhuman conditions. This content
analysis examines how popular news discourses shape the geopolitics of the Syrian
refugee crisis. We use framing theory to explore the main frames that emerged in a
comparison of 10 Arabic news sources with seven English news sources in their coverage
of the crisis. Based on a systematic random sample, 278 Arabic news stories and 210
English news stories were selected for further analysis. Qualitative data analysis
software was used to code and analyze the content of news stories at the article and
sentence levels. Four main frames emerged from the analysis: border, institutional,
victim, and war frames. Although the border frame was popular across all news sources,
English sources were more likely than Arabic sources to use the victim frame and less
likely to use the war frame. Implications as well as directions for future research are
Keywords: Arabic, journalism, news, framing, refugees, content analysis
Media messages play a significant role in shaping geopolitical conditions and our understanding
of the global balance of power. News frames, for instance, shape popular imaginations of issues of global
concern such as wars, disasters, and crises. Popular Western discourses on migration and refugees
become a public diplomacy tool to construct international geopolitical space and boundaries (Pamment,
2014). Although the United Nations (1951) defines refugees as persons “who have crossed national
borders due to a ‘well-founded’ fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group or political opinion” (Convention of 1951, Article 1A (2) , media
stories use specific frames to construct audiences’ notions of refugees. Even while centering such
discourses on human suffering, such frames often construct victims, persecutors, and saviors in ways
that reproduce geopolitical hierarchies (Chouliaraki, 2015). These discourses (among other factors such
Srividya Ramasubramanian:
Caitlin Miles:
Date submitted: 20170918
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4489
as immigration laws, political leanings, and interpersonal experiences) shape public opinions about
immigration and refugee resettlement.
Building on research into how conflicts and crises are represented in media stories, the current
project explores the news framing of the Syrian refugee crisis by English and Arabic media. Although
several scholars have examined international news coverage of crises and disasters, most of these studies
explore a single news outlet or a handful of news outlets rather than documenting the breadth of diversity
in news coverage across various media organizations. The present study uses a content analysis approach
to examine the key frames that emerge about the Syrian refugee crisis in 10 Arabic and seven English
news sources.
Background and Context
According to the Migration Policy Centre (2016), there are an estimated 11 million Syrian
refugees worldwide. More than 4 million of these refugees are in bordering countries such as Turkey,
Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq, with Turkey alone hosting just over 3 million registered refugees (United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Refugees Operational Data Portal, 2018). A recorded 797,605
refugees are within the European Union, with Germany hosting nearly 50% of them (Migration Policy
Centre, 2016). In 2015, under increasing pressure from the international community, then U.S. president
Barack Obama agreed to resettle about 10,000 refugees across 231 cities (Park & Omri, 2016). Similarly,
Canada has resettled more than 30,000 Syrian refugees (Government of Canada, 2016). The United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2018) estimates that 51% of the refugees are male, 48% are
female, and most are in the 1859 age group.
These rising numbers indicate a worsening political and military situation that is rooted in a
seven-year-long Syrian civil war. The conflict is rife with myriad players whose alliances and roles are not
only shifting but also contributing to a grave humanitarian crisis. Though there are efforts to support and
fund military cooperation, little consensus has been reached on the plight and status of Syrian refugees
worldwide.1 The past few years have been marked by troubling policies toward Syrian refugees across
Europe and North America. For example, as former U.S. president Obama announced his plan to accept
refugees in November 2015, nearly 31 governors responded with indignation, asserting a “right” to refuse
entry of these refugees into their states. Although these claims were legally baseless, the controversy
highlights the politicization of the crisis within U.S. conservative discourses on terrorism and national
security. Indeed, right-wing political pundits and governors related their concerns to the Paris bombings
and reports that at least one of the suspects was of Syrian origin (Fantz & Brumfield, 2015). This backlash
has been evident in U.S. president Donald Trump’s executive orders to place a temporary ban on migrants
from several predominantly Muslim nations.
1 For example, the Combined Joint Task ForceOperation Inherent Resolve is a NATO-funded mission that
has provided military and tactical assistance to regional, ethnic, and paramilitary groups combating DAESH
(a translation of the Arabic acronym formed of the same words that make up ISIS in English) militants.
4490 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
Political schemes instrumentalizing Syrian refugees are also apparent throughout Europe. In
2016, Germany brokered a deal between the European Union and Turkey, in which all “irregular migrants”
arriving to Europe from Turkey would be immediately returned to Turkey (Pamuk & Baczynska, 2016).
The deal has been criticized by human rights activists worldwide, noting the already hostile conditions
that refugees in Turkey face. Several countries in Europe have proposed quota systems for accepting
refugees, and some have outright rejected all refugees. Led by right-wing prime minister Viktor Orban,
Hungary has opposed resettlement and has garnered worldwide attention for a video showing a reporter
kicking and attacking Syrian refugees (Pamuk & Baczynska, 2016). The stance of Hungary, the EUTurkey
deal, and the U.S. state-level refusal all indicate increased hostility toward Syrian refugees.
Understanding the political, institutional, and cultural context surrounding the Syrian refugee
crisis is significant for underscoring the co-constitutive nature of news frames and broader social
dynamics. By highlighting some of the key trends and details surrounding the crisis, a more intricate
picture is painted for how and why certain news frames are rendered important within a given
sociopolitical context. By attending to the details of how the crisis is unfolding, we are able to better
assess how news frames and macro political dynamics co-construct notions of reality.
Framing Analysis
The public understanding of the Syrian crisis around the world is guided mainly by news frames.
Framing is a way of classifying and categorizing information that allows audiences to make sense of and
give meaning to the world around them (Goffman, 1974). Entman (1993) has defined framing as “making
some aspects of reality more salient in a text in order to promote a particular problem definition, causal
interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation for the item described” (p. 52). Frames
serve as metacommunicative structures that use reasoning devices such as metaphors, lexical choices,
images, symbols, and actors to evoke a latent message for media users (Gamson, 1995). Previous research
has distinguished issue-specific frames from generic frames that relate to structural featuressuch as
conflict, human interest, morality, economics, and responsibilitythat can be applied across topics and
issues (De Vreese, 2005; Elsamni, 2016; Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000).
At the individual level, frames influence how audiences attend to, interpret, remember, evaluate,
and respond to such issues; at the societal level, frames can shape public opinions and policies (De Vreese,
2005; Entman, 1993; Schefeule, 2000). Media frames provide subtle cues using visual and verbal/textual
devices that facilitate certain causal interpretations over others (Entman, 1993; Gilens, 1996; Iyengar,
1990. They activate related thoughts, feelings, and concepts through the cognitive networks of association
(Roskos-Ewoldsen, Davies, & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2004). The aspects of reality that are selected, organized,
and emphasized by media influence audience perceptions of the issue, the key actors, and the possible
solutions to social issues (De Vreese, Jochen, & Semetko, 2001). Media frames have agenda-setting power
to shape public discourse on social issues by promoting specific interpretations and opinions of public policies
by cueing in particular considerations (De Vreese et al., 2001; Entman, 1993). The construction of frames
is influenced by several factors such as journalists’ personal biases, organizational structures and practices,
media routines, cultural orientation, and geopolitical issues (Gamson & Modigliani, 1989).
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4491
Comparative News Framing of Crises
Comparative framing analysis examines differences in news frames of the same issue from various
cultural perspectives and ideologies (Dimitrova & Connolly-Ahern, 2007; Fahmy, 2010; Ravi, 2005). Even within
the same language, newspaper coverage of important issues can vary based on the paper’s political orientation
and ownership. Although a range of topics, issues, and frames are depicted in traditional Arabic news sources,
some of the common ones relate to crises, conflicts, and politics. Political news stories, especially those relevant
to pan-Arab interests such as civil unrest, are popular and serve as key gatekeepers in influencing political
agenda in the region (Ayish, 2002).
Research on comparative framing analysis of crises and conflicts has demonstrated distinct differences
in the frames emphasized by English versus Arabic news sources (Dimitrova & Connolly-Ahern, 2007; Fahmy,
2010; Fahmy & Al Emad, 2011). For instance, Al Jazeera English was much more likely than Al Jazeera Arabic
to carry news stories about the U.S-led coalition against Al-Qaeda as lead stories and front-page news (Fahmy
& Al Emad, 2011). Fahmy’s (2010) visual analysis of photographs about the 9/11 attack and the Afghan War
reveals that the English newspaper International Herald Tribune focused more on human suffering and
patriotism, while the Arabic newspaper Al-Hayat focused on material loss, antiwar frames, and humanizing the
war victims. Portrayals of the Iraq War in English news sources (The New York Times and The Guardian)
emphasized the rebuilding of Iraq, while Arabic newspapers (Al Jazeera and Al Ahram) focused on war, conflict,
and violence frames (Dimitrova & Connolly-Ahern, 2007). The following frames emerged from the analysis by
Dimitrova and Connolly-Ahern (2007): war-related, violence, human interest, diagnostic war, prognostic war,
antiwar protests, oil resources, media self-referential, looting, responsibility, and rebuilding frames.
Framing of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in News Media
Shifting our attention to the framing of refugees in the news, previous research has found that frames
can serve to humanize refugees or portray them as collective threats to security and values (Bleiker, Campbell,
Hutchinson, & Nicholson, 2013; Bozdag and Smets, 2017; Esses, Medianu, & Lawson, 2013). Two of the
dominant frames in such analyses are the victim frame and the intruder frame (Horsti, 2008; van Gorp, 2005).
Refugees are framed as helpless and passive victims of persecution in their homeland who need to be saved by
democratic nations through their flexible asylum policies. In contrast, the intruder frame presents refugees as
active adventure seekers engaged in criminal and illegal activities posing a threat to the cultural, economic, and
security needs of the host country. The victim and intruder frames work together to create a combination of
feelings of pity and hostility, which contributes to the dehumanization of refugees (Esses et al., 2013).
Many studies of the Syrian refugee crisis have focused on visual imagery. Bleiker and colleagues (2013)
note the absence of recognizable facial features in photographs of refugees in Australian news media. Such
depersonalization was linked with framing the refugee crisis as a security threat. Similarly, Cmeciu (2017)
examined 12 images used in the “Debating Europe” platform that deploy strategies such as blame shifting and
emotional frames to legitimize the lack of global action. In addition, Zhang and Hellmueller (2017) find that
CNN’s visual reportage uses techniques such as close-up shots to emphasize the human-interest angle, whereas
leading German newspaper Der Speigel focuses on security and xenophobic frames. Some researchers have
examined how the circulation of the photo of the dead Syrian child Aylan Kurdi through social media influenced
4492 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
humanitarian action (Bozdag & Smets, 2017; van Schaik, 2015). Overall, these analyses of visual rhetoric find
that photos about the Syrian refugee crisis in Western newspapers portrayed refugees in large groups, often
emphasizing the children in the group, to draw attention to the issue.
Textual analysis of news framing of the Syrian refugee crisis unveils slightly different patterns.
Dominant frames include attribution of responsibility, human interest, conflict, morality, and economic frames
(Elsamni, 2016; Lawlor & Tolley, 2017). Berry, Garcia-Blanco, and Moore (2015) find cross-national differences
in framing such that newspapers in Sweden, Italy, and Spain present the crisis in a fairly positive manner, but
those from Germany and the United Kingdom tend to reflect more polarization. A news analysis of Syrian fighters
in The Netherlands and Flanders by Berbers and colleagues (2015) finds that the main frames used are the
victim, terrorist, martyr, Don Quixote, and adventurer frames. In sum, research suggests that news media
portray refugees through multiple frames that create empathy through a more human-interest angle or present
refugees negatively as security threats.
Based on our understanding of the context of the Syrian refugee crisis and the review of relevant
literature on the framing of crises and refugees, our article aims to understand how Arabic and English news
sources frame the current Syrian refugee crisis. Specifically, we pose the following research questions:
RQ1: What key frames emerge in portrayals of the Syrian refugee crisis in the news media?
RQ2: Do Arabic and English news sources differ in their framing of the Syrian refugee crisis?
We expect Arabic and English news sources to frame the crisis differently, given how media often
perform the function of mediators of power, hegemony, and culture (van Zoonen, 1994). This expectation does
not assume culture or language as a wholly deterministic force in how the various news sources frame the crisis.
Rather, the distinct frames found in Arabic and English news sources indicate how sociocultural and political
positions are negotiated and realized through media. Media become avenues for negotiating, affirming, and
challenging systems of domination. That is, communication and culture co-constitute phenomena that converge
to inform how we understand our sociopolitical worlds (Shome & Hegde, 2002). As Anderson (2006) argues,
media work through a shared language to construct (national) communities. For example, we expect English
sources to reinforce the idea of the violent, Muslim Other and Arabic sources to humanize the crisis as a way of
challenging essentialist frames. The differential framing might indicate how cultural and political lines are drawn
to assert differences, thereby reinforcing systems of domination.
We conducted a content analysis of news stories on the Syrian refugee crisis to identify key frames in
Arabic and English sources. The stories were randomly sampled from Arabic and English news stories published
from March to June 2016.
Arabic and English News Sources
Articles were sampled from seven English and 10 Arabic news sources (see Table 1 for the full list).
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4493
Table 1. News Sources by Country and Ownership.
News Source
Al Alam
Al Ahram
Ad Dustour
Al Hayat
United Kingdom
Al Manar
Al Jazeera
Al Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Al Wahda Thawra
El Nashra
Syrian Arab News Agency
BBC International
United Kingdom
The Daily Mail
United Kingdom
The Guardian
United Kingdom
United States
The New York Times
United States
USA Today
United States
The Washington Post
United States
The news outlets were selected based on their popularity. For the Arabic sample, we examined all 10 sources
available via the Media Monitoring System, which includes popular blogs and websites beyond traditional
newspapers. The Arabic news sources reflect the diversity of news sources based on their popularity and
authority in the region. Top Arabic news sources from various countries were included: Al Alam (Iran), Al
Ahram (Egypt), Ad Dustour (Jordan), Al Hayat (United Kingdom), Al Manar (Lebanon), Al Jazeera (Qatar),
Al Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), Al Wahda Thawra (Syria), El Nashra (Lebanon), and Syrian Arab News Agency.
For the English news sources, we reviewed the Pew Research Center’s top 20 list of online news entities in
2015 in the United States to select The New York Times, The Washington Post, NBC/MSNBC, and USA Today.
BBC International, The Guardian, and The Daily Mail were selected from the United Kingdom.
For the English stories, we used the LexisNexis database to search for key terms of interest within
our search period. Duplicate stories were removed from the sample. The Arabic news stories were compiled
from the Media Monitoring System (MMS; see This system allows for analysis of
newspapers and social media data in several languages, such as Arabic, Chinese, and Russian, that are
generally not easily accessible to those not fluent in the languages. The system not only archives news
stories from major news sources in these languages but also translates them into English in real time. News
stories, broadcasts, and social media posts are gathered from newspapers, news channels, and social media
platforms with high regional circulation and following. In addition to circulation, outlets representing a
spectrum of ownership structure (i.e., private or public), political leaning, and geography are included. For
example, Arabic-language outlets in the system span from Egypt to Saudi Arabia are both state-sponsored
and privately owned and are characterized by critical/oppositional and pro-government outlets. The diversity
of news sources included in MMS allows for a rich and broad representation of regional news outlets. The
4494 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
translation software for MMS has been created, guided, and refined by native Arabic language speakers over
several years.
Sampling Time Frame
The sampling period was from March 1 to June 30, 2016. During this period, key regional and world
events directly impacted the plight of Syrian refugees. March 2016 was selected as the starting point, because
it was at this time that the Germany-brokered European Union and Turkey deal regarding the “return” of
refugees to Turkey was to be fully implemented. June 2016 was selected as a strategic end date because of the
Brexit referendum vote, the bombing at Istanbul Ataturk Airport, and the end of the U.S. presidential primary
election. All three of these events marked a contentious summer, with increased displacement of Syrians
deployed as a rallying cry to increase border security and limit migration to the United States and the United
Kingdom. Officials in the United Kingdom railed against EU immigration policies, citing concerns over national
security and sovereignty. Similarly, in the United States, Donald Trump maintained his position on halting the
acceptance of Syrian refugees throughout his presidential election campaign.
Constructed-Week Sampling
A constructed-week sample was created by downloading news stories that had any of the following
search terms: Syrian refugee, Syrian refugee crisis, Syrian migrant, and Syrian migrant crisis. The various terms
were selected based on geographic differences in terminology. From a preliminary analysis of English and Arabic
articles, it became clear that migrant was a preferred term among UK sources. Once all the news stories were
compiled, we arranged them by date and selected every third story for each news outlet by language. This
systematic sampling procedure allowed us to obtain a representative sample of each of the news sources without
having to analyze all the stories. It also allowed us to generalize the findings to the entire population of news
stories published in Arabic and English during this period. A total of 1,807 stories were gathered: 1,020 Arabic
articles and 787 English articles. Of these, the random sample generated 278 Arabic articles and 211 English
Analysis Procedures
News stories were coded and analyzed using a mixed-methods software called MAXQDA. This approach
was justified because the goal of the study was to develop an organic understanding and explore the major
frames across news sources. The MAXQDA system generated word clouds by month and language to assess the
frequency of various words and phrases among each language, month, and country. After word clouds were
generated, Excel-formatted word frequency lists were created.
The word frequency lists reflected the word clouds but provided a more extensive list of common
words, along with the numeric frequency of their appearance in the articles. To ensure that superfluous words
and phrases were excluded from the analysis, MAXQDA-provided “stoplists” were used prior to cloud and
frequency list generation. These stoplists included common articles and prepositions (i.e., the, a, with) and
pronouns. Using the MAXQDA-generated word clouds and frequency list, we analyzed each list and cloud to
assess the frequency and salience of different words and word clusters.
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4495
We independently analyzed the word clouds and word frequency lists to identify an initial set of frames
based on patterns of word clusters. Frames were not determined based on a priori information. Instead of
imposing generic or external frames on the data, frames were allowed to emerge from the data. We compared
and discussed the preliminary frames through an iterative process to reach consensus on the final set of frames.
For each distinct final frame, we went back to the stories a second time and used MAXQDA to search for and
highlight news stories at the article level and at the sentence level. At the article level, this search helped
establish how many news articles mentioned the frequently occurring words in each frame. At the sentence
level, the MAXQDA system searched for and highlighted frequently occurring words with a setting of five words
before and after the search term. The analyzed sentences allowed us to gain deeper insight into how words
were used in different contexts. For each frame, we noted how many analyzed sentences mentioned the
frequently occurring words in each frame. We subsequently read through analyzed sentences in each frame to
pick out the best exemplars that contextualized and situated the frames in Arabic- and English-language news
Analysis of Key News Frames
To answer the first research question, we used framing theory to guide the analysis of news stories
about the Syrian refugee crisis from Arabic and English news sources. Our analysis of the news stories revealed
four main frames: border, institutional, victim, and war. The border frame included words such as Turkey,
Europe, Arab, United States, and Jordan. The institutional frame included council, government, minister, and
union. The victim frame encompassed words such as children, people, migrants, and refugees. The war frame
included security, terrorism, war, and military. The following sections provide a brief overview of each frame,
analysis at the article level and sentence level for each frame, and snippets from stories that use each frame.
Border Frame
The border frame is constitutive of space, national borders, ethnicity, religious identity, and language.
This frame was characterized by a focus on physical spaces in relation to cultural and political identities and
institutions. The border frame was used in 453 articles (25.1%). Of these, 42.4% mentioned Turkey, 53.6%
mentioned Europe, 30.0% mentioned the United States, 22.9% mentioned Jordan, and 19.2% mentioned
Lebanon. Similarly, of the 7,695 sentences that used this frame, 23.6% mentioned Turkey; Europe, Jordan,
Lebanon, and the United States also occurred often. The articles in this frame highlight an emphasis on the flow
of refugees, placement, and regional political relations. The following quotes are representative examples of this
[Bibi] said that Jordan should not bear the responsibility of hosting refugees alone and the
[United] States [should] play its role in shouldering its responsibilities to relieve Jordan,
whether to support development projects, or consider the possibility of calculating these loans
from international institutions or donor countries to grant to Jordan, as well as to facilitate an
agent of the entry of Jordanian goods to the European Union market. (Ad Dustour, March 28,
2016, para. 14).
4496 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
Days after he signed the order, Brownback got a response in the form of a letter signed by
Secretary of State John Kerry and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson. In the five-page
letter, the two senior officials laid forth the procedures and security checks conducted before
a refugee is allowed to relocate to the United States. (The Washington Post, April 27, 2016,
para. 11)
Institutional Frame
The institutional frame identified issues related to governments, institutional bodies, political parties,
elections, and politicians. The border frame also references institutions, but the institutional frame is distinct in
that it solely refers to abstract governing and political bodies without reference to physical geography and/or
culture. A total of 408 articles (22.6%) used the institutional frame. Some 60.7% of these articles mentioned
government, 52.9% mentioned president, 47.1% mentioned political, and 9.8% mentioned Trump. Of the total
3,433 sentences that fit this frame, 18.6% mentioned government, 15.8% mentioned president, 13.4%
mentioned political, and 12.8% mentioned Trump. The articles and subsequent coded segments in this frame
indicate an emphasis on the political and policy implications and dynamics of the Syrian refugee crisis. Many of
the articles focus on the role of institutions in either mitigating or worsening the crisis and the subsequent impact
changes in leadership and elections are having on this crisis. Indeed, the U.S. presidential election, particularly
the Trump candidacy, dominates the political and institutional framings of the articles. Below are some examples
from this frame:
[Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants Nasser Joudah] stressed
that Jordan stands [at] the forefront of international efforts to combat violent extremism and
terrorism, pointing out that Jordan . . . has continued its participation in the war on terrorism
to defend the principles and values of Islam, confirming the intention of Jordan firmly and
with full force to address..the threat to the social fabric and the abduction of the Islamic
religion. (Ad Dustour, March 28, 2016, para. 18)
The Dutch EU Council Presidency is seeking to implement the refugee deal also on the part
of the EU. At the meeting of the interior ministers, it wants to oblige a majority of countries
to take over Syrian refugees from Turkey within the framework of the so-called one-for-one
deal. “This is an act of despair because far too few EU countries have so far expressed their
willingness to take over Syrians from Turkey in the near term,” said a diplomat. (BBC World
News, April 19, 2016, para. 5)
War Frame
The war frame addresses notions of national sovereignty, safety, war, geopolitical threats, and
military bodies, whether nationally sponsored or nonstate. A total 476 articles (26.3%) used the war
frame. A full 23.7% of these articles mentioned terrorism, 33.8% mentioned security, 41.2% mentioned
war, and 22.9% mentioned forces. Of the 2,516 sentences that used the war frame, 23.5% mentioned
terrorism, 22.2% mentioned security, 17.8% mentioned war, and 16.4% mentioned forces. The articles
that used a war frame focused on the human cost and toll of increased violence and the influx of refugees
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4497
from Syria into Europe, the United States, and neighboring countries in the Middle East. In sum, the
articles using this frame presented the crisis in relation to domestic, regional, and global concerns over
violence and humanitarianism issues, citing regional political instability, the worsening conflict, political
alliances, and the threat of terrorism from DAESH.2 Below are representative examples:
The President of the U.S. House of Representatives . . . pointed out that his visit to
Jordan and the delegation comes to emphasize the importance of the partnership
between the two countries and what can be done to help Jordan to overcome the effects
of the refugee crisis as well as the efforts of Veteran Syrian terrorism. (Ad Dustour,
April 6, 2016, para. 14)
Kurzman published a study in February that counted 81 American Muslims being
involved in extremist plots in 2015, the highest number in any year since the terrorist
attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. A majority of those individuals either traveled to Syria, or
sought to travel there, to join militant groups. Since 9/11, the study found, a total of
344 American Muslims had been involved in extremist plots, half of them involving
targets overseas, and 40 percent here at home (The Washington Post, June 15, 2016,
para. 21)
Victim Frame
Last, the victim frame addresses issues related to personal and emotional aspects of the crisis,
touching on notions of people, emotions, hardship, and even success in escaping the crisis. It emphasizes
the helplessness of the people affected by the crisis, noting the need for humanitarian and institutional
intervention. This frame focused on people and their personal stories. A total of 469 articles (25.9%)
used the victim frame. More than three-quarters (76.8%) of them mentioned refugees, 71.0%
mentioned people, 31.3% mentioned children, and 40.9% mentioned support. Of the 7,025 sentences
that used this frame, 25.2% mentioned refugees, 16.0% mentioned people, 6.6% mentioned children,
and 6.3% mentioned support. News stories that used a victim frame emphasized the personal hardships
and successes of Syrian refugees as they attempt to flee the Syrian civil war. They emphasized emotional
and personal narratives and stories to underscore the plight of those escaping the conflict. Many articles
in this frame positioned refugees as helpless or in need of help, noting strategies, policies, and
organizational efforts that either improve or worsen the conditions of those affected by the crisis.
Overall, the victim frame positions refugees as passive and in need of assistance. The following excerpts
are representative examples:
2 DAESH is an abbreviation of the Islamic State’s Arabic name: Dawlat al-Islamiyah f’al-Iraq w Belaad al-
Sham. This acronym is also reminiscent of an Arabic word meaning to “trample” or “crush.” Many have
begun using the term DAESH instead of ISIS or ISIL to resist the association of the terrorist organization
with Islam (Silverstein, 2015). In keeping with this trend and given the YPJ’s (Women’s Protection Units -
the homegrown defense forces of the Kurdish area of Syria) use of the term, we will also use the acronym
4498 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
On his part, said the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi,
living conditions in the States neighbouring Syria, “becoming increasingly difficult.” He
said that about 90 percent of the Syrian refugees are living below the poverty threshold
and 10 percent of them at least consider “in very poor conditions,” he said, adding:
“We cannot face of a refugee crisis comprehensive through closing the doors and
building walls,” in a reference to the agreement signed between the European Union
and Turkey on new immigrants arriving in Greece. (Al Hayat, March 31, 2016, para. 6)
James Brokenshire, a Home Office minister, said the government could not support a
policy that would “inadvertently create a situation in which families see an advantage
in sending children alone ahead and in the hands of traffickers, putting their lives at
risk by attempting treacherous sea crossings to Europe which would be the worst of all
outcomes.” (The Guardian, April 25, 2016, para. 6)
Analysis of Patterns: Arabic Versus English News Sources
To address the second research question, we compared news frames in Arabic and English news
sources. The analysis suggests that English-language news stories typically framed the Syrian refugee
crisis around domestic political, cultural, and economic concerns. Arabic language articles also focused
on regional and global political dynamics and trends but more so on the implications of war and conflict
for the personal and humanitarian conditions faced by Syrian refugees as people. This is not to imply
that Arabic-language articles were not concerned about or neglected domestic political concerns but
that, in general, articles were framed more from a human interest perspective in terms of the
consequences of war and geographical borders. As suggested by previous framing research, this finding
has implications for how the refugee crisis is framed in terms of key actors, how the crisis is defined,
and how responsibility is attributed for the crisis (De Vreese, 2005; Entman, 1993; Gilens, 1996;
Iyengar, 1990; Schefeule, 2000). Moreover, this suggests how culture, politics, and geographic lines
are affirmed and reinforced through the distinct linguistic news frames.
The type of news source (English or Arabic) had an effect on the percentage of coded segments
for each of the frames (χ2 = 194.4; df = 3; p < .001). The border frame (English 35.9% versus Arabic
38.32%) and the institutional frame (English 17.8% versus Arabic 15.66%) did not exhibit significant
differences, but the victim frame was more often featured in English sources (37.19%) than in Arabic
sources (31.5%), and the war frame was much more likely to appear in Arabic sources (14.6%) than in
English sources (9.14%).
It is important to keep in mind that many articles and sentences fell under multiple frames,
indicating that different news stories framed and approached the Syrian refugee crisis from multiple
perspectives. While these framings are not mutually exclusive, the results indicate distinctions between
the dominance of certain frames based on the language of the story. Arabic articles were marked by
phrasing such as Syrian refugee, crisis, people, and Syria. U.S.-based English articles tended to words
such as Turkey, EU, Europe, and Trump. U.K.-based English articles were marked by words such as
Turkey, EU, Syria, and refugees.
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4499
It is evident from our analysis that English articles were indicative of geographical and political
framings that emphasized refugees as victims in need of help, whereas Arabic articles emphasized the
conflict in Syria in terms of a crisis and the people affected by the conflict on the ground. Arabic articles
often deployed humanitarian framings, emphasizing the crisis in terms of the plight of Syrian refugees
and civilians, referencing how security and military forces either ameliorated or worsened the situation
of local and displaced people. For example, an article from Al Jazeera described the civilian impact of
ongoing violence, noting how oppositional military forces contribute to this situation: “The correspondent
added that also wounded civilians were killed as a result of artillery bombardment of the forces of order
targeted several towns in the area of Lawn, which is controlled by the armed opposition [in] Damascus
East [sic]” (Al Jazeera, May 6, 2016, para. 10).
Other Arabic articles similarly express the Syrian refugee crisis in terms of how concerns for
security or military advantage impacted local communities and populations and refugees. “The Syrian
regime forces bombard Al-Yarmouk camp [with] explosive barrels. . . . Al-Yarmuk Palestinian refugee
camp, south of the Syrian capital Damascus, is located under the siege of those forces since a long
period of time” (Al Jazeera, June 20, 2016, para. 1). “5 martyrs and 21 people were injured in an attack
the terrorist groups by rocket-propelled grenades, bullets and explosive sniper bullets on residential
districts in the city of Aleppo, in violation of a new today an Agreement on Cessation of Hostilities”
(Syrian Arab News Agency, June 11, 2016, para. 2).
English articles framed the crisis much more in terms of refugees as victims in the context of
geographical and political instability. Refugees were depicted as indistinguishable “masses” and
“millions” of bodies in need of food and shelter without much agency or freedom.
Thousands of Syrian refugees have ended up in limbo. Those in Jordan, Lebanon and
Turkey find themselves increasingly unwelcome in countries overburdened with
refugees. Many give up on their applications, joining the huge flow of people risking
their lives to travel to Europe or even back to Syria. (The Washington Post, March 13,
2016, para. 9)
The minor, who cannot be named, travelled through 17 countries from Syria before
reaching Calais and then the UK. Speaking through an interpreter, he said: “Most of
the children in the camps do have their families and parents with them but those
stranded around Europe and in Calais are very vulnerable because other people could
do something to them. That is the fundamental difference between the children in
Europe and those in the camps.” At least 95,000 unaccompanied child refugees are
estimated to have applied for asylum in Europe last year. Europol, the EU’s criminal
intelligence agency, estimated in January that 10,000 children had gone missing after
arriving in Europe, warning that many had been taken by criminal gangs. (The
Guardian, April 25, 2016, para. 18)
Arabic articles framed and referenced regional, geographic, and other cultural dynamics as
worsening the conditions of Syrian refugees. “According to a report published by the British Oxfam
4500 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
organization Tuesday non-governmental, rich countries no longer the resettlement [sic] of more than
67 thousand Syrian refugees, or 1.39 percent of the total number of refugees” (Al-Hayat, March 31,
2016, para. 3).
Turkey is trying, which hosts more than 2.6 million Syrian refugees, to keep the latest
wave of refugees on the Syrian side of the border, for several reasons, including
pressure on Russia, to stop its support to Al-Assad forces near the city of Aleppo, which
threatens the flow of hundreds of thousands of refugees to its borders. (Al-Hayat, April
27, 2016, para. 10)
English-language publications also focused on implications for domestic and world politics,
policies, and geopolitical issues. Many articles discussed what the crisis implied for local elections,
national security, and regional political aims and interests. For example, U.S. articles frequently
discussed the crisis in terms of U.S. national security and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Indeed,
many articles frequently referenced Donald Trump’s rhetoric and its implications for domestic U.S.
political dynamics: “Mr. Trump claimed Mrs. Clinton’s immigration policies would open the floodgates to
jihadists, pointing to her plan to increase the number of Syrian refugees admitted to the country by 550
percent over President Obama’s plan” (The New York Times, June 15, 2016, para. 3).
Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric has ranged widely: He has long stoked the idea that
Obama might be a secret follower of Islam. Two months before proposing the Muslim
ban, Trump announced he would kick all Syrian refugees out of the country and bar
any others from coming in because they could be a “Trojan horse.” Trump also
suggested killing the innocent relatives of terrorists. (The Washington Post, June 21,
2016, para. 1)
UK news articles such as this example from The Guardian frequently framed the crisis in light of the
impending Brexit referendum, positioning the crisis around economics and immigration policy:
Nor is Brexit likely to lead to big cuts in legal migration either. Over half of migration
comes from outside the EU. Johnson has promised access to the single market and a
good trade dealso given Europe’s current rules; we are most likely to end up like
Norway or Switzerland, with little change to immigration after all. Because if they don’t
do a good trade deal, the impact on jobs and growth would be disastrous. (The
Guardian, June 14, 2016, para. 8)
Although both Arabic and English sources use the border frame extensively, analyzing excerpts
is important for situating and contextualizing these patterns. Indeed, as the previous discussion
demonstrates, the various frames are not mutually exclusive and often work conjunctively. The stories
indicate that, while certain frames may dominate, their deployment must be understood through a
deeper analysis of the context to glean how a focus on culture or geography is informed by concerns for
border and national security, for example. Language and geography are interlinked from the vantage
point of the different news frames. That is not to suggest a natural link between language and
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4501
geographical location, but that news media referee these connections through the ways they represent
the crisis. Overall, the analysis reveals that Arabic sources formulate the crisis in terms of the impact of
ongoing violence on the people in Syria. They focus on the physical impact of the conflict, highlighting
stories and cases that underscore the devastation that has become a facet of daily life in Syria. Moreover,
these frames highlight the violence by reiterating the human toll of colonialism and nearly incessant
global conflict, emphasizing how other actors and players either ameliorate or exacerbate the
The border, institutional, war, and victim frames that are unveiled in our study are similar to those
found in analyses relating to the human suffering in times of war and conflicts such as during the Al-
Qaeda/U.S. conflict and the Iraq War (Dimitrova & Connolly-Ahern, 2007; Fahmy & Al Emad, 2011). This
study adds to scholarship on the coverage of refugee stories in general, which bring an emotional or
individual perspective while presenting an issue or event by personalizing it (Elsamni, 2016; Lawlor & Tolley,
2017). Research suggests that such frames often use anecdotal case study approaches that focus on
individual refugees to generate emotional responses to the stories, which can reinforce images of refugees
as helpless victims and attribute responsibility for the crisis on internal/individual causes rather than
external/societal ones (Gilens, 1996; Iyengar, 1990; Steimel, 2010). The Arabic articles’ focus on the crisis
from an emotional and humanitarian framework suggests that these humanizing frames might operate as a
symbolic resistance to the ways in which dominant, external forces have characterized and influenced the
region. For example, how might the focus on the refugees as people, living among constant physical
devastation, push against the grain of broader, global characterizations of the Syrian conflict and refugee
crisis from a realist, political perspective?
Frames from English sources represent refugees as victims, noting their helplessness and the
obstacles they face in seeking asylum. While these frames certainly underscore the emotional and physical
impact of the crisis on people, these stories also situate refugees as passive and in need of saving. These
sorts of references to victimhood and victimization, while drawing attention to a desperate situation,
simultaneously create a sociocultural hierarchy between the victim (Syrian refugee) and potential savior
(i.e., Western host country). The geographic and cultural orientation of these frames reveals that the
mainstream media have become nodes through which political and cultural discourses are addressed and
represented. The worsening refugee crisis points to how national and cultural identities are being questioned
and even potentially challenged as bodies flow across borders. For example, referring to the refugees as
passive, helpless victims reaffirms the narrative of the West as powerful, active, and in control of global
politics and culture. This frame serves to remedy or address anxieties as political control and influence shift.
Indeed, the very movement of these people suggests a porousness and permeability of borders, rendering
physical notions of the nation as tenuous and arbitrary. Additionally, regional and global alliances are being
tested and revised as old political hierarchies resurface. From a critical geopolitical perspective, these frames
then serve as public diplomacy tools for the West to maintain status quo through what Pamment (2014)
refers to as “discursive spatializations.”
4502 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
Although an increasing effort is under way to expand the reach of news media by making them
available in different languages and to various parts of the world, there continues to be a need for greater
access to news stories from a diversity of sources from around the world that offer alternative perspectives
on important global issues such as forced migration, natural disasters, war/conflict, and climate change.
Such access is important because the public relies heavily on mediated images to learn about global issues.
Although this study provides broad strokes in terms of overall portrayals of the refugee crisis,
further in-depth analysis is needed to understand the finer shades of distinct frames that might vary by the
news sources’ country of origin, ownership, and political affiliation. For example, future research could
examine the distribution among frames across specific outlets and regions based on source ownership
(private, public, or government-owned). Differences in Arabic versus English papers are not only based on
language but also due to distinct differences in news routines, information-gathering techniques, access to
technology, gatekeeping, editorial policies, and localized knowledge based on cultural proximity. This refined
lens would further provide a means to examine the interplay between geography, politics, and language on
news framing at the institutional and practice-based level.
Future research on how frames overlap and vary within specific institutions and within individual
articles would highlight how distinct news frames may work conjunctively to craft messages. Additionally, it
would be helpful to expand the scope of the sampling frame to a longer time period to record differences in
framing both temporally and spatially. Methodologically, this study’s use of computer-assisted coding of
textual information could be enhanced in future research by using qualitative analyses with human coding
of both visuals and texts.
This study offers a beginning conceptualization of how geography and sociocultural and political
dynamics influence the representation and framing of global humanitarian crises, such as the Syrian refugee
crisis, in relation to local concerns and interests. It addresses how media framing is contextually influenced
by geographic, political, and cultural position. Indeed, this study provides a glimpse into how broader
regional entities and dynamics influence news frames and suggests that media messages are not isolated
but intertwined with and influenced by the spaces and contexts in which they operate.
Bearing in mind Anderson’s (2006) formulation of the relationship between media, culture, and
language in fostering a sense of community, this study highlights how the framing of the Syrian refugee
crisis in news sources of different languages reflects processes of reinforcing boundaries. The differences
between English and Arabic news sources suggest that the contextually contingent frameworks are not only
reflections of local concerns but ways to reaffirm those geographical, cultural, and political contexts.
Language, culture, and politics converge in the context of these news frames. The Syrian refugee crisis, in
this sense, becomes a site for mediating and negotiating broader struggles over regional and global political
positions. Our study suggests a further consideration of how humanitarian crises are circulated and framed
within mediated texts and how this mediation speaks to negotiations of and challenges to sociocultural
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4503
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New
York, NY: Verso Books.
Ayish, M. I. (2002). Political communication on Arab world television: Evolving patterns. Political
Communication, 19(2), 137154.
Berbers, A., Joris, W., Boesman, J., d’Haenens, L., Koeman, J., & Van Gorp, B. (2015). The news framing
of the “Syria fighters” in Flanders and the Netherlands: Victims or terrorists? Ethnicities, 6(16),
798818. doi:1468796815603753
Berry M., Garcia-Blanco, I., & Moore, K. (2015, December). Press coverage of the refugee and migrant
crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries (Report for the United Nations High
Commission for Refugees). Retrieved from
Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchinson, E., & Nicholson, X. (2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees.
Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 398416.
Bozdag, C., & Smets, K. (2017). Understanding the images of Aylan Kurdi with “small data”: A qualitative,
comparative analysis of tweets about refugees in Turkey and Flanders (Belgium). International
Journal of Communication, 11, 40464069.
Chouliaraki, L. (2015). Digital witnessing in war journalism: The case of postArab Spring conflicts.
Popular Communication, 13(2), 105119.
Cmeciu, C. (2017). Visualizing Europe’s refugee crisis on the “debating Europe” platform. Style of
Communication, 9(1), 8395.
De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document
Design, 13(1), 5162.
De Vreese, C. H., Jochen, P., & Semetko, H. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-
national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107122.
Dimitrova, D. V., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2007). A tale of two wars: Framing analysis of online news sites in
coalition countries and the Arab world during the Iraq War. Howard Journal of Communications,
18(2), 153168.
Elsamni, A. (2016). Threat of the downtrodden: The framing of Arab refugees on CNN. Arab Media and
Society, 22(Spring), 115.
4504 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication,
43(4), 5158.
Esses, V. M., Medianu, S., & Lawson, A. S. (2013). Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in
promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3),
Fahmy, S. (2010). Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English-and Arabic-
language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 72(8),
Fahmy, S. S., & Al Emad, M. (2011). Al-Jazeera vs Al-Jazeera: A comparison of the network’s English and
Arabic online coverage of the US/Al Qaeda conflict. International Communication Gazette, 73(3),
Fantz, A., & Brumfield, B. (2015). More than half the nation’s governors say Syrian refugees not welcome.
CNN. Retrieved from
Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. In H. Johnson & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social
movements and culture (pp. 85106). London, UK: UCL Press.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power:
A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 137.
Gilens, M. (1996) “Race coding” and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review,
90(3), 593604.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Government of Canada. (2016). Canada welcomes Syrian refugees. Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
Retrieved from
Horsti, K. (2008). Europeanization of public debate: Swedish and Finnish news on African migration to
Spain. JavnostThe Public, 15(4), 4154.
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior,
12(1), 1940.
Lawlor, A., & Tolley, E. (2017). Deciding who’s legitimate: News media framing of immigrants and
refugees. International Journal of Communication, 11, 967991.
International Journal of Communication 12(2018) Syrian Refugee Crisis 4505
Migration Policy Centre. (2016). Syrian refugees: A snapshot of the crisisin the Middle East and Europe.
European University Institute. Retrieved from
Pamment, J. (2014). Strategic narratives in US public diplomacy: A critical geopolitics. Popular
Communication, 12(1), 4864.
Pamuk, H., & Baczynska, G. (2016). EU, Turkey seal deal to return migrants, but is it legal? Or doable?
Reuters. Retrieved from
Park, H., & Omri, R. (2016, August 31). U.S. reaches goal of admitting 10,000 Syrian refugees. Here’s
where they went. The New York Times. Retrieved from
Ravi, N. (2005). Looking beyond flawed journalism how national interests, patriotism, and cultural values
shaped the coverage of the Iraq War. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(1),
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models
approach for cultivation theory. Communications-Sankt Augustin then Berlin, 29, 345364.
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects
of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(23), 297316.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and
television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93109.
Shome, R., & Hegde, R. S. (2002). Postcolonial approaches to communication: Charting the terrain,
engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 12(3), 249270.
Silverstein, J. (2015, November 18). Daesh: The word ISIS doesn’t want you to sayand why politicians
are using it more than ever. New York Daily News. Retrieved from
Steimel, S. J. (2010). Refugees as people: The portrayal of refugees in American human interest stories.
Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(2), 219237.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Refugees Operational Data Portal. (2018). Syria regional
refugee response. Retrieved from
United Nations (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees. Retrieved from
4506 Srividya Ramasubramanian and Caitlin Miles International Journal of Communication 12(2018)
van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the
asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484507.
van Schaik, R. W. (2015, August 29). Visual representations of (Syrian) refugees in European newspapers
(Master’s thesis). Malmo University, Sweden. Retrieved from
van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Zhang, X., & Hellmueller, L. (2017). Visual framing of the European refugee crisis in Der Spiegel and CNN
International: Global journalism in news photographs. International Communication Gazette,
79(5), 483510.
... In this context, Baker pointed out how President Obama perpetuated border wars between Iraq and Syria by focusing his attention on individuals to generate emotional responses from audiences, which was easy to do with the chemical warfare that was taking place on Syria's own citizens. As such, Obama relied on anecdotal cases to maintain public support for the War in Iraq even as audiences grew increasingly wary over the continued need for military intervention (Ramasubramanian & Miles, 2018). In an earlier scholarly work, Mislan (2009) applied framing theory to note how publications like the Defender frame Obama's speeches as couched in racial politics. ...
... For Ramasubramanian and Miles (2018), the media discourse framed Obama's response to the Syrian crisis by reinstating past claims that the President had covert ties to terrorist organizations with members who practice Islamic fundamentalism. While Obama declared that he would resettle approximately 10,000 refugees across 231 cities, American media outlets framed his statements as influenced by pressure by the international community (Toosi, 2016). ...
... Yet, the thematic frames of Trump's speeches about diplomatic relations with the Middle East represented significant challenges to left-wing populist mobilization that was present when Obama served his presidential role (Bonikowski, 2017;Esfandiary, 2014). Increasing distrust in government institutions galvanized xenophobic public opinion about the human rights issues plaguing refugees from Syria and other parts of the Middle East (Bonikowski, 2017;Elsamni, 2016;Ramasubramanian & Miles, 2018). Moreover, the nationalist rhetoric invoked in several of Trump's speeches indicate Americans still needed a scapegoat long after the September 11 terrorist attacks effectively caused the War in Iraq because this messaging perfectly plays into right-wing tropes and his desire to be an authoritarian strongman figure. ...
Full-text available
Framing Theory is frequently used to understand the way individuals and agencies use word choice, connotation, and other factors to influence how others react to the information provided. For example, journalists use slant to influence the interpretation of their articles by the public. Through an examination of framing, individuals and agencies can gain insights into the reasons viewers or listeners react to communications in the way they do. The main goal of this article is to analyze how the American media frames presidents’ Bush, Obama, and Trump speeches regarding the Middle East and Iraq in particular, during their presidency of the United States.
... In their comparative analysis of the framing of the Syrian refugee crisis, Ramasubramanian and Miles (2018) found that while the Arabic articles used the emotional and humanitarian framework, the English ones framed the refugees as victims, passive individuals who are in need of saving. Differences were also observed within the same news outlet but in different languages. ...
This study examines the influence of the official signing of the Abraham Accords on the Arab media visual coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This study operationalized visual frames in terms of the human-interest vs technical frame and peace vs war frame, and explored the use of graphic portrayal as a framing device, in order to compare between the Arab media visual framing of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict before and after the official signing of the Abraham Accords to examine the impact of foreign policy on the coverage among news outlets of different Arab countries. A comparative analysis was conducted relying on the collection of visuals from the digital websites of three Arab television stations: Saudi Arabia-government owned Al Arabiya (reflecting a conservative stand towards the normalization), the Qatar-government owned Al Jazeera (reflecting an opposing stand towards the normalization) and Sky News Arabia, co-owned by Abu Dhabi Media Investment Corp, owned by a member of the Abu Dhabi Emirate ruling family, and British Sky Broadcasting (reflecting a supportive stand towards the normalization). The study examined a total of 3,298 visuals from two Gaza wars: the 2014 Gaza war that took place before the signing of the Abraham Accords and the recent Gaza war in 2021 which came after. The results show significant differences between the visual coverage of both wars as well as between the three news websites. This study contributes to the current understanding of how conflicts are framed on multi-levels, where peace vs war frames act as an outline framework reflecting the actual events, followed by more specific frames related to the attributes of war.
... While there is a well-established body of research about news sources in crisis communication (e.g., Cottle, 2009;Johansson & Odén, 2017;Ramasubramanian & Miles, 2018) and health news during routine periods (e.g., De Dobbelaer et al., 2018;Hallin et al., 2013), less is known about which sources prevailed in reporting the COVID-19 pandemic; and, subsequently, how it was communicated to the public. This is important when we consider that unlike the context of previous literature, the sheer scale and depth of disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic meant that it was covered not just by health specialists, but by journalists from all beats, whose sourcing patterns warrant scholarly attention. ...
Full-text available
How a health emergency is defined and presented through the news media matters for public understanding and health outcomes. Previous studies have endeavored to identify the patterns of news sourcing in crisis coverage, specifically the interplay between political sources and health expert sources, but yielded inconclusive results. This study analyses the types and roles of actors (those entities mentioned in a story) and sources cited in news coverage of COVID-19 by surveying social media posts published by 15 UK news outlets coverage across Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram between 1 January to December 31 2020. Overall, the findings show the prominence of political sources in UK news and that the most frequently named sources were representatives of the UK government. Moreover, when stories involved political actors, they were more likely to be given a voice as a source. This demonstrates how COVID-19 was a generalized crisis for the UK, which cascaded beyond health and into other economic, social, and cultural domains. The data show some variations in sourcing patterns between the different social media platforms. The analysis suggests that this may reflect the conventions of presenting news on each platform, with some tending toward the model of consensus by prioritizing political and government sources, and others contributing to a sphere of legitimate controversy by giving voice to a wider range of sources. This is distinctive and opens up the possibility for further research on how journalists adapt stories for social media and the consequences for public health communication.
... In contrast to this, studies on the events of 2015 conclude that migrants (mainly refugees from Syria) received more positive coverage (Berry et al., 2015;Fotopoulos & Kaimaklioti, 2016;Lawlor & Tolley, 2017). 5 However, migration was still depicted from a European perspective with little attention to contexts, the situation in countries of origin, or individual stories (Chouliaraki et al., 2017;Ramasubramanian & Miles, 2018). ...
Full-text available
Six years after the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ in 2015, the European Union remains divided on questions of migration and asylum policy. The issue also remains high on the agendas of the USA and Russia, two other key destination countries with immigration from Latin America and the Post-Soviet space. This article presents results from a comparative study of news coverage in 17 countries, focusing on 10 EU member states in Western and Central Eastern Europe (CEE), the USA and Russia. The intensity of coverage was remarkably different, with Hungary’s and Germany’s media standing out while Russian media displayed relatively low levels of coverage. Individual migrants and refugees were most visible in the two outlets from the USA. Media in CEE countries tended towards a more critical approach than media in Western Europe. However, differences between most countries’ pairs of analyzed media outlets indicate a more pluralistic debate than frequently assumed.
... Analyses studying patterns of lexicalization confirm the suppression of agency in refugee representations, either through a systematic use of non-agentive verbs such as 'drift', 'drown', 'arrive' (Horsti 2008), or through metaphors that render human individuals as natural phenomena and disasters such as 'floods ' and 'tides' that 'engulf' or 'swamp' social order (Baker & McEnery 2005;El Refaie 2001;Gabrielatos & Baker 2008, Mannik 2016, Pugh 2004, Zucker & Zucker 1996. While these phenomena are well-documented when it comes to the representational practices in the Global North, little is known about such practices in regions that are more directly implicated in crises (Ramasubramanian & Miles 2018). ...
Full-text available
Text-analytical approaches to humanitarian communication Anne Vestergaard The public circulation of images, speeches and written documents for the purpose of moral education dates as far back as these genres of communication themselves. Religious imagery and scripture are obvious cases in point. The practice of analyzing such texts as cultural traces of particular historical manifestations of morality has an equally long history, building on the legacy of theology and literary analysis in which, for centuries, scholars have sought to make sense of morality. Today, the integration of deep analytical engagement with individual pieces of text as a method in the social sciences is both enormously popular and, at the same time, criticized with respect to the scientific status of such methods and what kinds of conclusions they can legitimately support. The overall objective of this chapter is to explicate the epistemological assumptions of text-based qualitative research, addressing some of its critics' concerns, and to offer an overview of the uses of textual analysis in humanitarian communication by focusing on empirical work driven by visual and subsequently verbal/multimodal text analysis. I conclude by proposing directions for future textual approaches to humanitarian communication.
... Key studies include work by Chouliaraki and Zaborowski (2017), Berry et al. (2016), Szczepanik (2016), Zaborowski and Georgiou (2019), Holmes and Castañeda (2016) and Esses et al. (2013). While European, North America, and Australian media are predominantly the focus of such research, there are also studies that look at representations in Arab-language media (Abid et al., 2017;Ramasubramanian & Miles, 2018), in Chile (Valenzuela-Vergara, 2019), and in Malaysia (Ehmer & Kothari, 2020), among others. Most studies have focused on traditional press (Georgiou & Zaborowski, 2017) and representations on social media (Bozdağ & Smets, 2017), though a growing body of literature has explored refugees' data visualization (Allen, 2019;Risam, 2019) and cartography (Bueno-Lacy & van Houtum, 2019). ...
Full-text available
The lives of refugees are highly mediated. Media and technologies affect the daily experiences and trajectories of refugees in numerous ways while on the move as well as while settling into new homelands. Mediation processes also inform broader societal and political meanings that are assigned to refugees, as the figure of “the refugee” is constantly reshaped through processes of representation. Although these processes are much older, the research on refugees and mediation has accelerated especially since 2015. The literature focuses on three key areas: (a) refugees’ media uses and (dis)connectivity; (b) the role of media technologies in refugees’ everyday lives; and (c) media representations and narratives. Across these three areas, several important critiques have been formulated. These include criticisms of essentialist understandings of “the refugee” as well as Eurocentric and technocentric tendencies in the literature. A response to these criticisms might lay in a more historicized, contextualized, and situated approach to the mediated lives of refugees
... Several studies have shown that the personal stories of refugees and migrants are less covered in European media (Chouliaraki et al., 2017;Ramasubramanian and Miles, 2018). Even in countries where the level of media freedom is high, the media often reflects those topics which governments and other dominant groups consider a priority. ...
Full-text available
Using Framing Theory and Social Network Analysis, this report investigates how migration is framed in the Georgian media and who establishes these frames. The analysis is based on twelve media outlets, monitored during the period 1 August 2019 – 1 August 2021. The sample included television, online and print media. The most common frames observed were based on morality, human interest and responsibility, followed by conflict, economic and threat frames. Overall, media coverage of migration tends to be event oriented and relatively balanced. Reporting on migration is dominated by emigration issues, while immigration issues are largely absent. As Georgian media outlets reflect different socio-political positions, coverage of migration is heavily driven by editorial policy. Mirroring this dynamic, one segment of the media intensively covers migration through the “human interest” frame. This kind of media coverage is characterised by more analytical reporting and provides the public with as much information as possible. However, it should be noted that even when media framing is mainly concerned with human interest stories, it nonetheless refers to migrants as passive victims, reaffirming the role of elites as powerful, active and in control of society. The second form of coverage covers migration less intensively, through “moral” and “responsibility” frames, focusing on humanitarian aspects of emigration and attributing responsibility for solutions to government and authorities. The third type of case refers specifically to a small subset of coverage, especially the print media that most often focuses on the “threat” and “conflict” frames, portraying immigrants as a threat to Georgian culture – giving rise to prejudiced attitudes toward immigrants. This kind of coverage is characterised by intolerance and a rejection of immigrants. It is important to note that for much of the monitoring period Georgian media was responding to humanitarian crises such as the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, which to some extent has been reflected in the increased number of “moral” and “responsibility” frames voiced by the elites.
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper is to define, through content and frame analysis, the peculiarities in the representation of Ukrainian internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Ukraine’s local media and to compare this case with previous findings about the general peculiarities of perceptions of IDPs in the mass media. Two Ukrainian news sites were studied (2014–2018), giving a total 328 news items. My study revealed that the mass media do not differentiate between the terms ‘refugee’ and IDP and describe these latter as passive people (174 mentions as opposed to 77 mentions for active people). However, in the Ukrainian case, IDPs were in the top three of the most popular sources at the beginning of the resettlement (2014–2015). Later, the coverage became an episodic one, with publications about the topic typically having only one source – officials. The mass media preferred such frames as: ‘generalisation’, ‘victim’ and ‘help-receiver’. The ‘threat’ frame was less often used; however, some aggressive and manipulative phrases were disseminated. A ‘criminal’ frame was not at all popular. Thus, the local press may be an important forum for IDPs; Ukrainian journalists were interested in their stories although the coverage needs some improvement (a more ‘active’ angle, clear reference to IDPs as IDPs and not refugees and stories of socialisation etc.).
This chapter explores the intersection of race, culture, and language, so teachers can provide racially, linguistically, and culturally responsive teaching for diverse learners, as classrooms around the world are increasingly diverse. There has been an urgent call for teacher training to move beyond colorblindness to serve racially, linguistically, and culturally diverse learners in an equitable, antiracist, and socially-just climate. The purpose of this chapter is to present teaching materials framed by a cosmopolitan lens that help teachers examine who they are as a racial, linguistic, and cultural being to help super diverse learners in this global era.
Technical Report
Full-text available
In 2014, more than 200,000 refugees and migrants fled for safety across the Mediterranean Sea. Crammed into overcrowded, unsafe boats, thousands drowned, prompting the Pope to warn that the sea was becoming a mass graveyard. The early months of 2015 saw no respite. In April alone more than 1,300 people drowned. This led to a large public outcry to increase rescue operations. Throughout this period, UNHCR and other humanitarian organisations, engaged in a series of largescale media advocacy exercises, aiming at convincing European countries to do more to help. It was crucial work, setting the tone for the dramatic rise in attention to the refugee crisis that followed in the second half of 2015. But the media was far from united in its response. While some outlets joined the call for more assistance, others were unsympathetic, arguing against increasing rescue operations. To learn why, UNHCR commissioned a report by the Cardiff School of Journalism to explore what was driving media coverage in five different European countries: Spain, Italy, Germany, the UK and Sweden. Researchers combed through thousands of articles written in 2014 and early 2015, revealing a number of important findings for future media advocacy campaigns. Most importantly, they found major differences between countries, in terms of the sources journalists used (domestic politicians, foreign politicians, citizens, or NGOs), the language they employed, the reasons they gave for the rise in refugee flows, and the solutions they suggested. Germany and Sweden, for example, overwhelmingly used the terms ‘refugee’ or ‘asylum seeker’, while Italy and the UK press preferred the word ‘migrant’. In Spain, the dominant term was ‘immigrant’. These terms had an important impact on the tenor of each country’s debate. Media also differed widely in terms of the predominant themes to their coverage. For instance, humanitarian themes were more common in Italian coverage than in British, German or Spanish press. Threat themes (such as to the welfare system, or cultural threats) were the most prevalent in Italy, Spain and Britain. Overall, the Swedish press was the most positive towards refugees and migrants, while coverage in the United Kingdom was the most negative, and the most polarised. Amongst those countries surveyed, Britain’s right-wing media was uniquely aggressively in its campaigns against refugees and migrants. This report provides important insights into each country’s press culture during a crucial period of agenda-setting for today’s refugee and migrant crisis. It also offers invaluable insights into historical trends. What emerges is a clear message that for media work on refugees, one size does not fit all. Effective media advocacy in different European nations requires targeted, tailored campaigns, which takes into account their unique cultures and political context.
Full-text available
The images picturing the refugee crisis are heavily emotion-laden and the picture of the dead boy Aylan on the beach is such an example. Besides newspapers where pictures of refugees have been used to stir the readers' attention, debating platforms have used visual images to initiate debates with the EU citizens about Europe's refugee crisis. Designed on a 'bottom-up approach', the 'Debating Europe' platform empowers citizens by encouraging a dialogue between Europe's policymakers and experts, on the one hand, and citizens, on the other hand. Each debate embeds an issue to be addressed and visual images which may serve as incentives for a vivid debate. The selection of these visuals plays a significant role in the representation of a particular issue. The sample used for this qualitative analysis consists of the visual images (photographs and infographics) of nine debates on Europe's refugee crisis (2013-2015). Since Europe's refugee crisis is both about attributing responsibility and human interest, we will provide an integrated visual framework for our analysis. Using a qualitative content analysis of the visual images depicting the refugee crisis we want to identify (1) the types and the salience of the participants depicted, (2) the communication strategies and the (re)bordering issues used to (de)legitimate these represented participants, (3) the types of emotions used by the 'Debating Europe' platform to visually frame the refugee crisis.
Full-text available
Building on previous research that has theorized and operationalized the concept of global journalism, this study analyzed 287 photographs published on CNN International and Der Spiegel online news sites to examine the evidence of global journalism practices in visual news content. The results of the quantitative content analysis revealed that the transnational news outlet CNN International more frequently used close-ups and tracking shots to feature refugees in its visual reportage than the German news magazine Der Spiegel. The large presence of the ‘human interest’ and the ‘lose/gain’ frames in CNN International’s visual coverage emphasized the humanitarian aspect of global suffering. In contrast, apart from the ‘human interest’ frame, the ‘law and control’ and ‘xenophobia’ frames were adopted in Der Spiegel’s visual coverage. Using such a comparison, this study discussed if news sources’ capacity of managing the visibility of suffering could reflect a cosmopolitan viewpoint on a global issue.
Full-text available
This article questions how Arab refugees and asylum seekers were framed in global news, represented by the online international edition of one leading news network, namely CNN. Based on framing theory, this article presents the results of a quantitative content analysis that assessed which news frames were existent in the news coverage of the Arab refugee crisis. The sample of this study consisted of the news articles published by CNN online during January 2016. This month was chosen because it witnessed a series of negative events involving Arab refugees and asylum seekers in their countries of resettlement, such as the Cologne sex attacks and Istanbul suicide bombing.
Full-text available
Immigration is a policy field increasingly shifting under supranational decision-making in the EU. This article analyses news coverage of African "illegal" migration to the Canary Islands in a Finnish and a Swedish newspaper. Analysis of the northern European public debate of a southern European news event shows how the "migration crisis" is simultaneously Europeanised and domesticated in Finland, yet treated as a typical foreign news event in Sweden. Domestication increases coverage and viewpoints: in addition to the dominating news frames which present the African migrants as objects of criminalisation, control, and victimisation, reportage from Africa suggests a heroic frame. Although there are characteristics of a mediatised public crisis within the event, and therefore potential for social change through increased media salience, the main news coverage remains stigmatising - constructing a division between Europe and Africa.
'Imagined Communities' examines the creation & function of the 'imagined communities' of nationality & the way these communities were in part created by the growth of the nation-state, the interaction between capitalism & printing & the birth of vernacular languages in early modern Europe.
One of the peak moments of the debate on the European refugee crisis was caused by the circulation of images of Alan Kurdi, a three-year-old Syrian boy who drowned in the Aegean Sea on September 2, 2015. The images triggered worldwide reactions from politicians, nongovernmental organizations, and citizens. This article analyzes these reactions through a qualitative study of 961 tweets from Turkey and Flanders (Belgium), contextualizing them into the framing and representation of refugees before and after the images were released. Our study finds that, despite their iconic qualities and potential to mobilize Twitter users around refugee issues, the images did not cause a major shift in common discourses and representations. Instead, references to Kurdi were incorporated into preexisting discourses on and representations of refugees, thus offering different actors in the public debate on refugees with new symbols and motifs to construct meaning. The so-called European refugee crisis refers to the notable rise in the number of refugees and migrants coming to the European Union (EU) since 2015 to seek asylum. Although they constitute a diverse population, many of the refugees originate from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Eurostat (2016) states that, in 2015, more than 1.2 million first-time asylum seekers were registered in the EU, more than the double the number in 2014. Coinciding with an ongoing EU polity crisis, the influx of refugees caused highly mediatized public debates. Some pivotal points in these debates were the sinking of five boats in the Mediterranean Sea, causing the death of an estimated 1,200 people in April 2015; Hungary's construction of a barrier at its Serbian and Croatian borders; and the circulation of photographs of Alan Cigdem Bozdag The authors would like to thank Yazan Badran for his assistance with downloading the tweets.
The prominence of citizen voice in contemporary war and conflict reporting has been both hailed as a democratic turn that gives visibility to hitherto powerless audiences and deplored as a demotic turn that sensationalises the news and marginalises deeper understandings of conflict. Rather than taking sides in this debate, I privilege an analytical approach that conceptualises war and conflict reporting as a securitisation of news—a discursive practice by which citizen voice is used to construe conflict as a humanitarian emergency, in line with contemporary conceptions of Western warfare, and to legitimise forms of action. I subsequently look into BBC’s convergent reporting on two post-Arab Spring conflicts, Libya and Syria, so as to explore precisely how citizen voice participates in securitising the news and which discourses of action it articulates.
Crime and welfare are now widely viewed as "coded" issues that activate white Americans' negative views of blacks without explicitly raising the "race card." But does the desire of whites to combat crime or curtail welfare really stem from their dislike of blacks? Are these not pressing problems about which Americans rightly should be concerned--apart from any associations these issues may have with race? In this paper I assess the extent to which white Americans' opposition to welfare is rooted in their attitudes toward blacks. Using conventional survey modeling techniques and a randomized survey-based experiment from a national telephone survey, I find that racial attitudes are the single most important influence on whites' welfare views. I also show that whites hold similar views of comparably described black and white welfare mothers, but that negative views of black welfare mothers are more politically potent, generating greater opposition to welfare than comparable views of white welfare mothers.