ArticlePublisher preview available

A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Patients’ Early Treatment Outcome Expectation and Their Posttreatment Outcomes

American Psychological Association
Psychotherapy
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Patients' outcome expectation (OE) represents their belief about the mental health consequences of participating in psychotherapy. A previous meta-analysis of 46 independent samples receiving the treatment of at least 3 sessions revealed a significant association between more optimistic baseline, or early treatment, OE and more adaptive posttreatment outcomes (weighted r-.12 or d-.24; Constantino, Glass, Arnkoff, Ametrano, and Smith, 2011). The present study represents an update to that meta-analysis. To be included, articles published through June 2017 had to (a) include a clinical sample, (b) include a therapist-delivered treatment of at least 3 sessions, (c) include a measure of patients' own OE, (d) include at least 1 posttreatment mental health outcome not explicitly referenced as a follow-up occasion, and (e) report a statistical test of the OEoutcome association. The updated meta-analysis was conducted on 81 independent samples (extracted from 72 references) with 12,722 patients. The overall weighted effect size was r-.18, p .001, or d-.36, with high heterogeneity (I2-76%) and no evidence of publication bias. Several variables (patient age, measure type, and treatment manual used) moderated the OEoutcome association. These robust, replicated meta-analytic findings are discussed in light of methodological limitations and with regard to their practice implications.
A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Patients’ Early Treatment
Outcome Expectation and Their Posttreatment Outcomes
Michael J. Constantino
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Andreea Vîsla
˘
University of Zurich
Alice E. Coyne
University of Massachusetts Amherst
James F. Boswell
University at Albany, State University of New York
Patients’ outcome expectation (OE) represents their belief about the mental health consequences of
participating in psychotherapy. A previous meta-analysis of 46 independent samples receiving the
treatment of at least 3 sessions revealed a significant association between more optimistic baseline, or
early treatment, OE and more adaptive posttreatment outcomes (weighted r.12 or d.24;
Constantino, Glass, Arnkoff, Ametrano, & Smith, 2011). The present study represents an update to that
meta-analysis. To be included, articles published through June 2017 had to (a) include a clinical sample,
(b) include a therapist-delivered treatment of at least 3 sessions, (c) include a measure of patients’ own
OE, (d) include at least 1 posttreatment mental health outcome not explicitly referenced as a follow-up
occasion, and (e) report a statistical test of the OEoutcome association. The updated meta-analysis was
conducted on 81 independent samples (extracted from 72 references) with 12,722 patients. The overall
weighted effect size was r.18, p.001, or d.36, with high heterogeneity (I
2
76%) and no
evidence of publication bias. Several variables (patient age, measure type, and treatment manual used)
moderated the OEoutcome association. These robust, replicated meta-analytic findings are discussed in
light of methodological limitations and with regard to their practice implications.
Clinical Impact Statement
Question: This article examined the association between patients’ presenting, or early treatment,
expectation for a given treatment’s helpfulness and their outcomes after treatment ends. Findings:
Patient outcome expectation (OE) is an empirically supported correlate of treatment outcome that
therapists need to assess throughout treatment, attempt to heighten at treatment’s outset, and respond
to sensitively if/when it wanes. Meaning: The OEimprovement correlation increases the scientific
credibility of formerly ill-named “nonspecific” factors like expectancies; thus, there is sufficient
information to incorporate systematically OE-fostering and OE-restoring strategies into clinical
practice and training. Next Steps: Future research needs to (a) test strategies that causally enhance
patients’ OE to improve treatment efficacy and (b) illuminate both patient and therapist contributions
to patient OE to help tailor clinical practice and training.
Keywords: psychotherapy, patient outcome expectation, psychotherapy relationship, psychotherapy
outcome, meta-analysis
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000169.supp
Patients’ expectations have long been considered a key ingre-
dient and common factor of successful psychotherapy (Frank,
1961;Goldfried, 1980;Goldstein, 1960a;Rosenzweig, 1936). In
his classic, Persuasion and Healing,Frank (1961) argued that
patients enter therapy because they are demoralized, and that for
any therapy to be effective, there must be within the patient a
mobilization of belief in the ability to improve. To Frank, this
positive outcome expectation (OE) precipitates a sense of remor-
Michael J. Constantino, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences,
University of Massachusetts Amherst; Andreea Vîsla
˘, Department of Psychology,
University of Zurich; Alice E. Coyne, Department of Psychological and Brain
Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst; James F. Boswell, Department of
Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York.
This article is adapted, by special permission of Oxford University Press,
by the same authors in J. C. Norcross & M. J. Lambert (Eds.) (2018),
Psychotherapy relationships that work (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford
University Press. The Interdivisional APA Task Force on Evidence-Based
Psychotherapy Relationships and Responsiveness was cosponsored by the
APA Division of Psychotherapy/Society for the Advancement of Psycho-
therapy.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael
J. Constantino, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Univer-
sity of Massachusetts Amherst, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA 01003-
9271. E-mail: mconstantino@psych.umass.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychotherapy © 2018 American Psychological Association
2018, Vol. 55, No. 4, 473–485 0033-3204/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000169
473
... This impact of expectations can also be seen in the world of psychotherapy, where it plays a crucial role in treatment outcomes (Constantino, Arnkoff, Glass, Ametrano & Smith, 2011). In a recent meta analysis that included 72 articles, patient's expectations was found to be strongly associated with better treatment outcoms with moderating effect by the working alliance (Constantino, Vîslă, Coyne & Boswell, 2018). Past studies showd a positive correlation between positive patient's expectancties and a stronger working alliance that leads to better treatment outcomes (Vîslă, Constantino, Newkirk, Ogrodniczuk & Söchting, 2018). ...
... The expectations of patients have traditionally been regarded as a fundamental component and shared element contributing to the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions (Frank, 1961;Goldfried, 1980;Rosenzweig, 1936). Since then, more updated research also showed this trend and revealed additional richness that can explain the positive effect of patient's expectations on treatment outcomes (Constantino, Vîslă, Coyne & Boswell, 2018;Kube, Rief & Glombiewski, 2017). In theory, a lower or absent level of optimistic expectation (OE) may serve as a central manifestation of demoralization, which is a term coined by Frank (1961) to describe a state of psychological distress that can obscure an individual's perception of a brighter future. ...
Thesis
Background: Working alliance between therapist and the patient has been shown as an important feature of psychotherapeutic processes. There is need for identification of working alliance markers that could be predicted. Movement synchrony between the patient and the therapist is a one of the candidates. Developing a predictive model of movement synchrony may improve the quality of the treatment and could be implemented in other related fields. Aim: To develop a predictive model of movement synchrony based on patient’s characteristics using machine learning techniques. Method: Eighty six patients, suffering from depression were recruited offering free psychological treatment for depression. All patients answered intake questionnaires measuring baseline factors, and personal background information and then received sixteen video-recorded sessions of psychological therapy. Movement synchrony of each dyad (patient and therapist) was estimated using motion energy analysis which is quantifying movement based on the recorded session video frames. Then, patients were clustered to low\high synchrony’ groups. Results: Jaccard similarity analysis identified two patterns for nonverbal synchrony changes across sessions. One pattern (high synchrony group) showed initial high synchrony, followed by relatively large fluctuations, while the other (low synchrony group) displayed low synchrony initially with a small upward trend (N=22 and N=64, respectively). SVM with a radial kernel was used to classify patients into low and high synchrony groups based on the answers from intake questioneers, and achieved the accuracy 88% and Cohen’s kappa 0.68. Non-anxious attachment style, high expectations from the treatment, and gender match between patient and therapist were key predictors for high synchrony group. Conclusions: The study's results illuminate the complex dynamics of patient-therapist movement synchrony through a data-driven approach and machine learning techniques. Findings reveal the crucial roles of patient attachment style, treatment expectations, and gender congruence in influencing movement synchrony Importance of the study: These insights contribute significantly to understanding of movement synchrony's nuances, offering clinicians a predictive model for strengthening alliances and tailoring interventions, ultimately enhancing psychotherapy effectiveness.
... Identifying these factors can have a positive impact on both psychotherapy research and practice. For example, client outcome expectations have been identified as one ingredient that is associated with client change (Constantino et al., 2018). Knowing this, psychotherapy researchers can work to identify the nuances of the role of expectations in predicting or explaining treatment outcomes (e.g., timing of expectations that best predict outcomes, expectation fluctuations over sessions, predictors of expectations) as well as ways to manipulate or improve them. ...
Article
Full-text available
Several models have attempted to explain the contribution of various therapeutic factors to psychotherapy outcomes. Norcross and Lambert’s (2011) frequently cited model suggests that 30% of the contribution is made by the client, 12% by the relationship, 8% by the treatment, 7% by the therapist, and 3% by other factors and 40% is unexplained. However, these models primarily consider the researcher perspective regarding the causes of change in psychotherapy. The purpose of the present study was to identify therapist and client perspectives of the factors that lead to change in psychotherapy. Participants were a nationwide sample of 149 practicing therapists and 232 current or former psychotherapy clients recruited from mental health clinics. Therapists and clients were told that 40% of the psychotherapy outcome variance is unexplained and 3% is explained by other factors. They were then asked to provide their own estimates for the contribution of the client, the relationship, the treatment, and the therapist to psychotherapy outcomes. Overall, the client and therapist samples differed in their views of the factors that lead to change in psychotherapy when compared with the researcher view. Clients viewed their own contribution as the most important factor (although estimating their contribution to be much smaller than estimated by researchers), while therapists rated the therapeutic relationship the highest. These findings highlight the importance of listening to client and therapist perspectives to better understand psychotherapy outcomes. Future research should seek to bridge the gap between theory and practice by engaging all stakeholders in psychotherapy research.
Article
Shift workers are at increased risk of insomnia. The standard treatment (cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia) poses significant challenges for this demographic due to irregular work and sleep schedules. New approaches are still considered insufficient due to high attrition or insufficient effectiveness. Our preliminary study identified sleep-relevant state and trait factors (see secondary outcomes) for incorporation into an innovative manual that addresses sleep in an implicit manner. The objective was to reduce the focus on insomnia and to replace regularity-based interventions. With a sample of 55 insomniacs (67.74% male, mean age 41.62 years), standard and customized treatments were compared using pre-treatment, post-treatment, and three-month follow-up measurements (RCT, self-assessment data). Our linear mixed models revealed the main significant effects of the measurement point for the primary (insomnia severity, sleep quality, sleep onset latency, total sleep time, daytime sleepiness) and the secondary outcomes (selection: anxiety/depression, dysfunctional beliefs, arousal, emotional stability, concern). No main effects of the condition or interaction effects were identified. Non-inferiority and equivalence tests demonstrated that the customized treatment is equivalent to standard therapy, which is a favorable outcome in light of the implicit approach. Consequently, this innovative approach warrants further exploration, incorporating the present results.
Article
Full-text available
Meta-analyses indicate that patient outcome expectation (OE) and therapeutic alliance quality each correlate positively with improvement across diverse psychotherapies. Moreover, research demonstrates that these constructs relate to one another, including higher OE correlating with better subsequent alliance. However, notable gaps in this area remain. First, most studies that have examined the OE–alliance association have done so from the patient perspective only, despite both constructs having dyadic properties. Second, few studies have examined the connection between these two constructs longitudinally to capture their dynamic interrelations. Third, few studies have parsed OE–alliance links into their within- and between-dyad components, masking interpretability. Finally, most studies derive from controlled trials for specific diagnoses, limiting generalizability. Addressing these gaps, we tested the dyadic, dynamic, and statistically parsed associations among patient and therapist OE and alliance in naturalistic psychotherapy. Patients and therapists rated OE and alliance quality across up to 16 weeks of treatment. For dyads with the requisite data (N = 111 patients nested within 37 therapists), we used a multilevel actor–partner interdependence model that simultaneously tested all within- and between-dyad actor and partner effects of OE on alliance quality. At the within-dyad level, there were no significant actor or partner effects. At the between-dyad level, there were no significant partner effects, but there was a positive OE–alliance actor effect for both patients and therapists. Results suggest that community-based therapists may consider attending most to each participant’s average level of OE across therapy (vs. fluctuations) when forecasting its influence on their own overall relationship experience.
Article
Full-text available
Depression is one of the main reasons for seeking mental health services; however, few studies have focused on the perspective of depressed patients to understand what they expect from this instance. This study aims to develop a comprehensive model of patients’ initial expectations regarding psychological treatment in mental healthcare settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen depressed adult patients referred to psychological care before their first session. Data was analyzed using grounded theory and consensual qualitative methods. Patients had expectations regarding the characteristics of psychological treatment, the psychologist, and changes. Patients expect psychological care to have a clear purpose and to last the time required until they feel better. They expect the psychologist to be an active and responsive professional. Regarding changes, patients expect to understand why they have depression, develop personal resources, and improve their self-esteem and mood. Facilitating factors (e.g., preferences for psychological support over medical treatment) and hindering factors (e.g., institutional constraints) were identified in achieving these expectations. Based on patients’ expectations, a helping relationship that is more responsive to their needs is underlined. Therapeutic skills and contextual factors are key facilitating elements to meet these expectations. The findings discuss how addressing expectations can serve as input for delivering more satisfactory treatment to patients.
Article
The well-documented between-individuals correlation between anxiety and depression cannot address within-individuals questions, such as whether targeting depression subsequently alleviates anxiety comorbidity. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of focusing on within-individuals processes to provide evidence-based guidelines to commonly encountered questions in clinical practice. This study examined the within-patient effect of reduction in depression on subsequent reduction in anxiety during a treatment targeting depression, as well as the potential variability in this effect between patients. Data from a randomized controlled trial of more than 3,220 observations nested within 100 patients treated for depression were used. Findings indicate that at the sample level, targeting depression reduced depression, which, in turn, predicted a subsequent reduction in anxiety. Although no qualitatively distinct subgroups emerged, quantitative differences between individuals were found. The pretreatment interplay between depression and anxiety explains heterogeneity between individuals. The findings have implications for personalizing depression treatment to address comorbidities.
Article
Full-text available
This meta-analysis tested the Dodo bird conjecture, which states that when psychotherapies intended to be therapeutic are compared, the true differences among all such treatments are 0. Based on comparisons between treatments culled from 6 journals, it was found that the effect sizes were homogeneously distributed about 0, as was expected under the Dodo bird conjecture, and that under the most liberal assumptions, the upper bound of the true effect was about .20. Moreover, the effect sizes (a) were not related positively to publication date, indicating that improving research methods were not detecting effects, and (b) were not related to the similarity of the treatments, indicating that more dissimilar treatments did not produce larger effects, as would be expected if the Dodo bird conjecture was false. The evidence from these analyses supports the conjecture that the efficacy of bona fide treatments are roughly equivalent.
Article
Full-text available
75 Ss (mean age 36 yrs) who met Research Diagnostic Criteria for a current episode of Major, Minor, or Intermittent Depressive Disorder were assessed on a number of demographic and psychological variables prior to beginning treatment. Treatment outcome was assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Ss at all levels of depression severity improved markedly, but those who were initially more depressed tended to maintain their relative ranking at posttreatment. After accounting for pretreatment depression severity (PTDS), 6 additional variables emerged as significant predictors of outcome: Ss who improved most had expected to be least depressed posttreatment, had greater perceptions of mastery, had greater reading ability, were younger, perceived their families as more supportive, and were not receiving additional concurrent treatment for depression. These 7 variables, including PTDS, accounted for 51% of the variance in posttreatment depression level. These same variables, excluding PTDS, significantly discriminated between Ss who still met diagnostic criteria for depression at the posttreatment assessment and those who were no longer depressed. (29 ref)
Article
Full-text available
Documents a growing discontent among therapists of varying orientations. Psychoanalytic, behavioral, and humanistically oriented clinicians are starting to raise serious questions about the limits of their respective approaches and are becoming more open to contributions from other paradigms. The trend resembles a crisis of the type described by T. S. Kuhn (1970) in his work on scientific revolutions. Some of the political, economic, and social forces apt to affect the likelihood of ever reaching a consensus within the field are noted, and an approach to the delineation and study of commonalities across various orientations is presented. (2 p ref)
Article
Full-text available
Psychotherapist competence in attending to cultural processes has long been considered an ingredient of successful treatment. Although some research findings support a positive association between clinician multicultural competence (MCC) and client improvement, others suggest that MCC may not be a skill that therapists uniformly acquire and then stably maintain. Rather, MCC is likely more fluid and contextualized, potentially rendering within-therapist variability across their patients and within-dyad variability across different moments in a given case. With such variability in perceptions and actual behavioral manifestations of therapist MCC, it may be important for clinicians to heed contextual markers that call for flexibility and evidence-informed responsivity. To this end, we extend Constantino, Boswell, Bernecker, and Castonguay’s (2013) context-responsive psychotherapy integration framework, a pantheoretical, if-then approach to responding to common clinical process markers with modular, evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Specifically, we present a therapy case supporting that clients’ social and cultural identities can serve as both specific-client contexts in themselves and unique factors that may influence other important therapeutic contexts (e.g., lowered client outcome expectation and alliance ruptures, client change ambivalence/resistance to treatment) that require context-relevant therapist responsivity. With this case, we provide examples both of successful responsivity and missed opportunities.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Although there is an established link between patients’ early positive outcome expectation for and their actual improvement from therapy, there is little research on patients’ change in outcome expectation across therapy and both patient and therapist correlates of early outcome expectation level and change. The present study examined: (1) the overall trajectory of change in patients’ outcome expectation through cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression; (2) patient characteristics as predictors of both initial outcome expectation and change in outcome expectation; and (3) between-therapist effects in outcome expectation change. Method: Depressed patients (N = 143) received a brief course of CBT. Outcome expectation was measured at screening, pretreatment, session 7, and session 14. Results: Outcome expectation linearly increased from screening to session 14. When controlling for other patient characteristics at intake, having previous depressive episodes was negatively associated with initial outcome expectation and higher well-being was positively associated with initial outcome expectation. When controlling for early alliance and early symptom change, outcome expectation change was predicted by previous depressive episodes. Finally, therapist effects emerged in outcome expectation over time. Conclusions: Various depressed patients’ characteristics predict initial outcome expectation level and change, with significant between-therapists’ differences related to outcome expectation change.
Chapter
Client preferences in psychotherapy reflect specific conditions and activities that clients desire in their treatment, with increasing evidence pointing to preference accommodation as facilitating psychotherapy outcomes. This updated meta-analysis establishes the magnitude of the effect of client preference accommodation in psychotherapy. Based on data from 53 studies and over 16,000 clients, preference accommodation was associated with fewer treatment dropouts (odds ratio = 1.79) and more positive treatment outcomes ( d = .28). The chapter provides case examples of preference accommodation, limitations of the research, diversity considerations, and practice recommendations for working with client preferences.
Article
Patients' psychotherapy outcome expectation correlates with post-treatment outcome; yet, there is limited research explicating causal determinants of this expectation. We tested the influence of specific expectancy persuasion methods, integrated into a video presentation of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) rationale, on socially anxious analogue patients' post-rationale treatment/clinician beliefs, treatment motivation, anxiety symptoms, and therapeutic action. Participants were socially anxious undergraduates randomized to the experimental group (CBT rationale + expectancy persuasion strategies; N = 85) or control group (CBT rationale only; N = 93). As hypothesized, there were significant increases across both groups in anxiety change expectation, perceived confidence in using CBT exposure techniques to address social anxiety, and perceived exposure helpfulness. Unexpectedly, the expectancy strategies did not influence the outcomes. Conclusions: Results underscore the clinical importance of delivering a clear treatment rationale; however, the embedded expectancy persuasion methods may have lacked sufficient salience to augment the general rationale effects.