PosterPDF Available

ASSESSMENT OF MICROPLASTIC CONCENTRATIONS IN HUMAN STOOL - FINAL RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors:

Abstract

ASSESSMENT OF MICROPLASTIC CONCENTRATIONS IN HUMAN STOOL FINAL RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
ASSESSMENT OF MICROPLASTIC CONCENTRATIONS IN HUMAN STOOL
FINAL RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
ASSESSMENT OF MICROPLASTIC CONCENTRATIONS IN HUMAN STOOL
FINAL RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
Bettina Liebmann1, Sebastian Köppel1, Philipp Königshofer2, Theresa Bucsics2, Thomas Reiberger2 and Philipp Schwabl2
1 Environment Agency Austria (Umweltbundesamt GmbH), Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria. bettina.liebmann@umweltbundesamt.at
2 Div. of Gastroenterology & Hepatolology, Dept. of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
The microplastics literature provides evidence that tiny plastic particles are accumulating in the marine food chain. Scientists have also detected
microplastics in food intended for human consumption such as salt or bottled drinks. It has been long suspected that humans are orally exposed to
microplastics via their diet. This pilot study was conducted with eight participants from across the globe. Each person kept a food diary in the week
leading up to their stool sampling. This first study of its kind did confirm that plastics are unintentionally ingested and ultimately reach the human
gut.
8 healthy male and female participants from AT, FI, UK, IT,
JP, NL, PL and RU
Exclusion criteria: diagnosed gastrointestinal disease, recent
dental treatment, medical diets, alcohol abuse and intake
of drugs affecting stool frequency, consistency or
resorption.
Pre-Treatment of Human Stool Samples
SAMPLE PRE-TREATMENT
Conference on Nano and microplastics in technical and freshwater systems, Microplastics 2018, 28-31 October 2018, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland
Do microplastics reach the human gut?
Participants
Conclusion & Outlook
Data collection and sampling
Food log to track 6-7 days prior to sampling
Questionnaires on plastic exposure, alcohol
consumption, chewing gum consumption,
cosmetics, drinking habits from PET bottles
Sampling of ~50 g stool
All images ©Umweltbundesamt, unless otherwise stated.
©Medical University of Vienna / P. Königshofer
Stool samples and blanks before (above) and after 2 weeks (below)
of H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) treatment.
Aims at reducing the amount of natural stool constituents.
After 2 weeks, still a fair amount of solids was left.
Separation of solids into fractions 0.05-0.5 and > 0.5 mm
Coarse fraction of pre-treated
stool (> 0.5 mm) with seeds, fibres,
fluff and thin-layered fragments
remaining.
ATR-FTIR measurements,
no > 0.5 mm plastics detected
FT-IR IMAGING EXAMPLE
Stool residues of size 0.05-0.5 mm
Left: Photograph of analytical sample
Right: FT-IR transmission images
correlation R² with plastics is color-coded;
here: Polyethylene , R² = 0.7-0.9.
Too many false positives for microplastics caused by
interfering biological material that was still remaining
after pre-treatment.
Fine fraction of pre-treated stool
(0.05-0.5 mm) with small
particles, fibres and fluff
remaining.
FTIR measurements in
transmission with imaging
Detection of Microplastics by FT-IR Spectroscopy and Imaging
NEXT STEP: IDENTIFY MATERIAL OF SOLID REMAINS
AND TEST FOR THE PRESENCE OF MICROPLASTICS:
Polyethylene (PE), Polypropylene (PP), Polyamide
(PA), Polyvinylchloride (PVC), Polystyrene (PS),
Polyethylenterepththalate (PET), Polyurethane (PU),
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Polycarbonate
(PC), Polyoxymethylene (POM).
ADVANCED SAMPLE PREPARATION MADE
QUANTIFICATION POSSIBLE!
Additional
chemical/enzymatic
procedures
Final Results
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Assessment of contamination caused by lab:
No microplastic particles > 50 µm (10 plastic
materials listed above) detected in blank sample.
Microplastics reach the human gut and are
(partly?) excreted with the stool.
The present pilot study included only a small
sample size for first screening in humans.
The analytical procedures are now available
for human stool screening.
Expand work to a study with a larger number
of participants.
Refine study design for investigating plastic
exposure and medical implications.
Plan for analytical validation experiments
using microplastic reference material.
1 particle
identified as
Polyethylene.
©https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Relief_map_of_Eurasia.png
FI
NL
PL
AT
IT
UK
RU
JP
STOOL RESIDUES FOR ANALYSIS
3 male and 5 female participants, aged 33-65 yrs
0/8 vegetarians
2/8 daily chewing gum users
6/8 ingested sea food during observation period
8/8 contact with plastic-wrapped food
~ 750 ml/day beverage consumption from PET
20 microplastic particles/10 g stool (median)
(Q1-Q3: 18-172)
of size 50-500 µm
8/8 samples tested positive for microplastics
9/10 plastic types detected overall
3-7 different plastic types per sample
7 g stool analysed (median) (Q1-Q3: 3-11)
STOOL ANALYSIS
RELATIVE FREQUENCIES OF MICROPLASTIC TYPES
PP and PET were found in 100% of samples (*)
PP, PET, PS and PE were found in >95% of
samples
Successful reduction of biological matrix so that the
masking effect is diminished considerably.
Automated FT-IR image analysis results in fewer false
positives.
Additional expert check of each particle’s IR spectra
is crucial for setting reasonable correlation
thresholds.
... Microplastics were found in the analysis of fecal samples taken from individuals with a diet rich in aquatic products in different geographical regions (Liebmann et al., 2018). ...
Article
Microplastics are formed through the breakdown of engineering products in consumer goods and large plastic products. These anthropogenic pollutants accumulate globally in both marine and freshwater ecosystems. Nowadays, people use personal care products a lot, and microplastics formed through the decomposition of the packaging of these products spread to the land and water ecosystems, and many living things come into contact with them. Studies have made the presence of microplastics in body parts such as the gastrointestinal tract and stomach, especially in marine and freshwater fish. It can cause physical harm in fish such as internal organ and tissue damage, immune system damage, accumulation, obstruction and damage in the gastrointestinal tract. Increasing evidence shows that a wide range of fish species are susceptible to microplastic ingestion. Already to many criteria such as overfishing, habitat loss, and the increasing number of invasive fish, the negative effects of microplastics will cause fish populations to decrease and some species to become extinct. It is known that plastic pollution, especially about increasing plastic production, poses a great threat to humans, aquatic creatures, and the global environment. Therefore, to draw attention to the danger of microplastics, in this study, the conducted research was examined, the effects of microplastics were reviewed, and the study results were evaluated. In this study, all articles searching microplastics and the amount of microplastics in freshwater fish were systematically examined. 25 studies were found that included the criteria we were looking for, and in these studies, the presence of microplastics was detected in a total of 100 fish species.
... Certainly, the divide between nature and culture is no longer sustainable. Internalisation of plastics whether through inadvertent ingestion, dermal and oral contact, or inhalation is unavoidable -plastics now permeate the sea, land, and sky -as evidenced by studies of human stools (Liebmann et al. 2018;Schwabl et al. 2019;Zhang et al. 2021), blood (Leslie et al. 2022), and placentas (Ragusa et al. 2021). Science and industry have long known about the negative health consequences for humans. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Here I will explore the contradictions raised by small plastic things forgotten, to paraphrase historical archaeologist James Deetz (1977), which were born from scientific innovation, entrepreneurial incentive, and concern for public health. The dental flosser, toothbrush, birth control pack, tampon and menstrual pad, condom wrapper, sanitising wipe, medical syringe, and surgical mask all qualify as mundane, taken‑for‑granted artefacts ripe for archaeological inquiry. I consider a few of these things in greater depth. To frame my discussion, I draw on ideas about biopower, a concept developed by Michel Foucault and taken up by subsequent writers. I argue that biopowered plastic things marshalled in the service of public health present a conundrum. Science‑based evidence supports their efficacy for safeguarding lives. Yet, because they represent techniques of power designed to control individuals with the aim of a more pliant, cohesive body politic (much like plastic as it moves from mouldable to hardened), these things engender pushback from the resistant, critical, opportunistic, and misinformed; ideologies and authorities are never absolute...
... Certainly, the divide between nature and culture is no longer sustainable. Internalisation of plastics whether through inadvertent ingestion, dermal and oral contact, or inhalation is unavoidable -plastics now permeate the sea, land, and sky -as evidenced by studies of human stools (Liebmann et al. 2018;Schwabl et al. 2019;Zhang et al. 2021), blood (Leslie et al. 2022), and placentas (Ragusa et al. 2021). Science and industry have long known about the negative health consequences for humans. ...
Chapter
Plastic waste is becoming a big environmental issue that has to be dealt with quickly to reduce its adverse impacts on ecosystems and human health. To ensure a healthier future for our world, this book chapter explores the crucial concerns surrounding the handling and recycling of plastic garbage, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable approaches. This chapter examines the drawbacks and inefficiencies of conventional waste treatment systems, highlighting the grave effects of plastic pollution on public health, marine habitats, and biodiversity. The main focus of the present is a thorough evaluation of modern treatment methods and recycling procedures. The discussion highlights innovations in chemical, mechanical, and biological approaches, emphasizing the significance of promoting a circular economy to reduce the environmental footprint of plastic items.
Article
Full-text available
Microplastics are emerging pollutants that have garnered significant attention, with evidence suggesting their association with the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In order to assess the impact of polystyrene microplastic exposure on alterations in the gut microbiota and the subsequent implications for glucose dysregulation under different dietary conditions in mice, we investigated the effects and disparities in the blood glucose levels induced by polystyrene microplastic exposure in mice fed a high-fat diet versus those fed a normal diet. Using 16S rRNA sequencing and bioinformatics analyses, we explored the dynamic changes and discrepancies in the gut microbiota stability induced by polystyrene microplastic exposure under varied dietary conditions, and we screened for gut genera associated with the potential of polystyrene microplastics to disrupt glucose homeostasis. Our findings indicate that a high-fat diet resulted in abnormal mouse body weight, energy intake, blood glucose levels and related metabolic parameters. Additionally, polystyrene microplastic exposure exacerbated the glucose metabolism disorders induced by a high-fat diet. Furthermore, the composition and diversity of the mouse gut microbiota were significantly altered following microplastic exposure, with 11 gut genera exhibiting a differential presence between mice fed a high-fat diet combined with microplastic exposure compared to those fed a normal diet with microplastic exposure. Moreover, Ucg-009 played an intermediary role in the association between a high-fat diet and the fasting blood glucose. Hence, our study demonstrates that polystyrene microplastic exposure exacerbates high-fat diet-induced glucose metabolism disorders, whereas its impact on the blood glucose under normal dietary conditions is not significant, highlighting the differential influence attributable to distinct alterations in characteristic gut genera.
Article
Polystyrene microplastics, extensively considered endocrine disrupting chemicals, disturb the reproductive system of living organisms. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the reproductive endocrinopathy, is longstanding concern due to its eternal impacts as reproductive disorder and infertility. Despite several reports in reproductive and endocrine toxicity, there is inadequate literature regarding the daily intake of polystyrene-microplastics via drinking water in causing PCOS and leading to ovarian fibrosis in long-term. The present study investigated whether daily consumption of polystyrene-microplastics at doses equivalent to human exposure can cause PCOS and progress to ovarian fibrosis, using female zebrafish as model. Resembling letrozole-PCOS zebrafish model, daily intake of polystyrene-microplastics displayed hallmark PCOS pathophysiology; like excess body weight and %Gonadosomatic index, decreased Follicle Stimulating Hormone and β-estradiol, increased Luteinising Hormone, brain and ovarian Testosterone (39.3% and 75% respectively). Correspondingly, ovarian histology revealed more developing (stage I and II) oocytes and less mature oocytes alongwith cystic lesions; like follicular membrane disorganization, zona pellucida invagination, theca hypertrophy, basophilic granular accumulation and oocyte buddings. Lipid deposition in intestinal and ovarian tissues was evidenced and increased fasting blood glucose manifesting insulin resistance. The expression of PCOS biomarkers (tox3, dennd1a, fem1a) was significantly disturbed. Polystyrene microplastics played vital role in inducing PCOS further enhancing oxidative stress, which positively influences inflammation and aggravate ovarian mitophagy, shedding light on its ability to harshen PCOS into ovarian fibrosis, which is characterized by collagen deposition and upregulation of pro-fibrogenic biomarker genes. These findings illustrate the potential of daily microplastics intake via drinking water in triggering PCOS and its progression to ovarian fibrosis.
Chapter
The increased reliance on plastic products in day-to-day life has resulted in massive buildup of plastic waste in every ecosystem. Microplastics include plastic materials with size ranging from 1 micron to 5 mm and being the persistent and globally pervasive pollutants, microplastics pose considerable risk to ecosystems, biota, and food webs. Microplastics have been reported from freshwater, land, sea, and biota and are unequally distributed showing the highest concentrations in bio-productive seas, coastal waters, and subtropical gyres. The characteristics of microplastics, i.e., detection capability, motility, and relative concentrations, feeding strategy of organisms, and geographical overlap affect the encounter rate of microplastics and biota. Trophic transfer, inhalation, ingestion, and entanglement are the main routes by which microplastics enter the food webs. Several invertebrates, bivalves, crabs, and small fish have been reported to ingest microplastics, which are then transferred across the food chain and food web. Microplastics are also considered the carriers of pathogens and toxic chemicals. Numerous research studies have reported that microplastics negatively affect living organisms, i.e., reproductive reduction, feeding disruption, disturbed metabolism, and intestinal damage. Microplastics are also known to translocate, bioaccumulate, and release toxic chemicals into the body. This chapter focuses on the sources, entry, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification of microplastics in food chains and food webs in various ecosystems.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Microplastics may be present in food and drinks from various sources, exposing pregnant women to these particles. Consumption of contaminated food can lead to the ingestion of microplastics by pregnant women, potentially causing adverse health effects on the fetus. This study aims to investigate the presence of microplastics in the stools of pregnant women. Methods The research was conducted in the Makassar City region of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Thirty healthy pregnant women from 2 community health centers, Pattingalloang and Jumpandang Baru, participated in the study. Their stools were analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy to detect the presence of microplastics. Result The analysis revealed the presence of a total of 359 microplastics in the participants’ stools, with particle counts ranging from 4 to 21 and sizes ranging from 0.2 to 4.9 mm per 25 g of stool. The polymers identified included Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Polyamide/Nylon, Polyethylene Chlorinated, HDPE, and Ethylene Propylene. The amount of microplastics varied significantly among groups with different levels of seafood consumption. Conclusion Indonesian pregnant women have been exposed to some microplastic polymers.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.