ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) at the Agricultural University of Athens during the growing summer season 2017 to evaluate the effects of biocyclic humus soil on plant growth, yield as well as chemical constituents and quality parameters. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications of three treatments (untreated, inorganic fertilizer and biocyclic humus soil). A two-leaf cutting was placed into the treated soil to make a sweet potato plant. The highest sweet potato yield was obtained by using biocyclic humus soil with average total yield (35.6 t/ha) and average marketable yield (24.3 t/ha). There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments for the compression (Max Load 0.622-0.780 kN) and the penetration (Max Load 0.0439-0.0447 kN) tests on sweet potato tubers. Furthermore, measurements were implemented for the total nitrogen content of tubers with no statistical significant differences between treatments. The big difference in yield between sweet potato grown in humus soil and sweet potato treated conventionally probably is related to the fact that the structure of soil which is a clay loam soil was too compact for the cultivation of sweet potato, a disadvantage which has been compensated by using humus soil as substrate while substituting soil.
210
EFFECT OF BIOCYCLIC HUMUS SOIL ON IELD AND UALIT
ARAMETERS OF SWEET OTATO (Ipomoea batatas L.
Lia Drtea EISENBACH
1
, Antilena FOLINA
1
, Carileia ISI
1
, Iannis ROUSSIS
1
,
Ianna TABAI
1
, anaita AASTLIANOU
1
, I. KAKABOUKI
1
,
Aspasia EFTHIMIADOU
2
, Dimitris . BILALIS
1
1
Agricltral niersity o Atens, Scool o Agricltre, ngineering an nironmental
Sciences, Department o Crop Science, Laoratory o Agronomy, 75 Iera Oos Street,
118 55 Atens, reece
2
Institte o Soil Science, ellenic Agricltral Organiation-Demeter, 1 S. Venielo Street,
1123 Lycorissi, reece
Corresponing ator email ilalisimitriosgmail.gr
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) at the Agricultural University of Athens during
the growing summer season 2017 to evaluate the effects of biocyclic humus soil on plant growth, yield as well as
chemical constituents and quality parameters. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design (CRD)
with three replications of three treatments (untreated, inorganic fertilizer and biocyclic humus soil). A two-leaf cutting
was placed into the treated soil to make a sweet potato plant. The highest sweet potato yield was obtained by using
biocyclic humus soil with average total yield (35.6 t/ha) and average marketable yield (24.3 t/ha). There were no
statistically significant differences between the treatments for the compression (Max Load 0.622-0.780 kN) and the
penetration (Max Load 0.0439-0.0447 kN) tests on sweet potato tubers. Furthermore, measurements were implemented
for the total nitrogen content of tubers with no statistical significant differences between treatments. The big difference
in yield between sweet potato grown in humus soil and sweet potato treated conventionally probably is related to the
fact that the structure of soil which is a clay loam soil was too compact for the cultivation of sweet potato, a
disadvantage which has been compensated by using humus soil as substrate while substituting soil.
Key words: biocyclic humus soil, Biocyclic Vegan Standard, sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas L., productivity and
quality.
INTRODUCTION
e total gloal seet potato proction in
201 as more tan 105 million tonnes AO-
SA, 2018 it Cina aing te iggest
sare in proction aot . Cina an te
.S. are te astest groing eporters. og
seet potato is a traitional crop or many
contries o te orl Cina, Meico etc.
cltiation an consmption in ropean
contries ecame more poplar in te last
ecaes. Loeenstein, 2009. e ropean
proction is oere y or contries
Portgal, Spain, Italy an reece it a total
proction o 52 tosan o tonnes in 201. In
te same year ree seet potato proction
as 3,3 tosan tonnes cltiate in an area o
1 a AO-SA, 2018.
Seet potato origins are on in Central or
Nortestern Sot America e to te
occrrence o ropical orest root crop
agriculture (O’Brien, 1972). It as son tat
ater an analysis o seet potato genotypes it
RAPD marers te ispersal o seet potato
as een aciee more trog te
CentralCariean genopool ici et al.,
2003.
e scientiic name o seet potato is Ipomoea
batatas L. Lam an elongs to te
Conollaceae amily. Ipomoea batatas can
e aste in many climate ones sc as
arm mi tropics or mil s-temperate
ones also at an altite o 2000 meters. e
plant o seet potato preers a sany loam
gron an is cltiate oten on mons or
riges Lim, 201.
e eile parts o te seet potato plant are
te roots or ters t also te seet potato
leaes an green tips. Seet potato lor or
starc is also se as an ingreient or
Scientic Papers. Series A. Agronomy, Vol. LXI, No. 1, 2018
ISSN 2285-5785; ISSN CD-ROM 2285-5793; ISSN Online 2285-5807; ISSN-L 2285-5785
... Nevertheless, in our study, the yield was higher under organic blends fertilizers. Similar results occurred for Eisenbach et al. (2018) [66]. This can be explained by the fact that in this application the growth of roots is improved, which is responsible for the intake of nutrients and water. ...
... Nevertheless, in our study, the yield was higher under organic blends fertilizers. Similar results occurred for Eisenbach et al. (2018) [66]. This can be explained by the fact that in this application the growth of roots is improved, which is responsible for the intake of nutrients and water. ...
Article
Full-text available
While processing tomato cultivation (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is considered one of the most important industrial crops in Greece, a waste known as tomato pomace is growing significantly high. Notably, the tomato pomace presents enormous opportunities for the creations of organic fertilizers. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of tomato pomace as a fertilizer in the same crop. A field experiment was established at the Agricultural University of Athens during 2018 and 2019 in a randomized complete design with five treatments (control, inorganic NPK (NPK), Tomato pomace and Biocycle Humus Soil (Tp and BHS), Tomato pomace and Farmyard manure (Tp and FYM), and Tomato pomace and Compost (Tp and CM). Physical soil properties such as soil porosity and penetration resistance were improved by the application of organic blends. Additionally, soil nitrogen content ranged from 0.10% (control and NPK) to 0.13% (Tp and FYM). A significant increase of yield was noticed under organic fertilization where the highest yield of 8.00 tn ha−1 was recorded in Tp and BHS (2018). Lycopene content was significantly affected by fertilization and its highest values were 87.25 (Tp and BHS; 2018), and 88.82 mg kg−1 fresh (Tp and FYM; 2019). Regarding fruit firmness, the three organic blends did not have statistically significant difference. In addition, the Total Soluble Solids (TSS) was significantly affected by the fertilization and the maximum value was 4.80 ◦Brix (Tp and CM; 2018). In brief, tomato pomace blended with organic fertilizers was yielded considerable since it improved soil quality and increased yield.
... As a practice, SOA actively works with the multiplicity of remarkable qualities and agencies certain plant species and varieties are endowed with. According to its proponents and initial evidence from field experiments (Eisenbach et al., 2018;, soils can thus be maintained and productive without intrinsic violence against human or nonhuman animals. To date, visions linked to permaculture or small-scale farming (e.g. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Academic, policy, and public debates have increasingly led to calls for the adoption of plant rich diets. Livestock's 'long shadow'-its high environmental footprint-and the need to transform food systems towards sustainable practices are widely recognized. However, despite their incremental normalization, vegan and vegetarian diets can still lead to fierce debates between people with different dietary identities. Arguing that identity-based understandings of who or what is 'vegan' obfuscate necessary changes in production and provisioning practices, this contribution develops a wider understanding of vegan food practices by shedding light on stockfree organic agriculture's organization, biomateriality, and its 'short' shadow. The chapter makes a contribution to food system organizing with a practice approach.
... Academic and practitioner literature has favorably associated veganic approaches with various agronomic factors, including: yield, quality, nutrient cycling, soil nitrogen level, soil carbon storage, soil biology, soil organic matter, and energy inputs (Pimentel et al. 2005;Cormack 2006;Hepperly et al. 2006;Eisenbach et al. 2018;Matsuura et al. 2018;Eisenbach et al. 2019;Roussis et al. 2019;Rosato et al. 2020;Utter and Seymour forthcoming) 3 ; sustainable agriculture or food systems (Hall and Tolhurst 2007;Visak 2007;Burnett 2014;Bonsall 2015;Hagemann and Potthast 2015;Hirth 2020;Kassam and Kassam 2021;Nobari 2021); food safety (O'Brien 1964;Seymour 2018a;Alsanius et al. 2019;Utter and Seymour forthcoming); diminished environmental impacts (Markussen et al. 2014;Seymour 2018a); marketing potential (Jürkenbeck et al. 2019;Jürkenbeck and Spiller 2020); and "animal-friendly" (Visak 2007) and "post-lethal" (Mann 2020) agriculture. Despite the diversity of veganic 2 "Stockfree" was selected as a "more neutral technical term," not necessarily associated with veganism (Schmutz and Foresi 2017, p. 477). ...
Article
Full-text available
Veganic agriculture, often described as farming that is free of synthetic and animal-based inputs, represents an alternative to chemical-based industrial agriculture and the prevailing alternative, organic agriculture, respectively. Despite the promise of veganic methods in diverse realms such as food safety, environmental sustainability, and animal liberation, it has a small literature base. This article draws primarily on interviews conducted in 2018 with 25 veganic farmers from 19 farms in the United States to establish some baseline empirical research on this farming community. Its qualitative perspectives illuminate farmer perceptions of and experiences with veganic growing, including definitions, knowledge acquisition, values, and challenges. Results highlight a lack of agreement about the meaning of veganic agriculture in terms of allowable inputs and scope. Participants have drawn on a wide array of veganic and non-veganic resources to ascend their veganic production learning curves, also relying on experimentation and trial-and-error. Their farming is motivated by a diversity of real and perceived benefits, most notably consistency with veganism, food safety advantages, and plant and soil health benefits. Veganic product sourcing and the dearth of veganic agriculture-specific resources present considerable challenges to farmers. The article briefly discusses possibilities for developing veganic agriculture in the United States, such as through a US-based certification system and farmers’ associations, based on considerations of the trajectory of the US organic farming movement and veganic developments in Europe. Finally, the article suggests the importance of expanded research into soil health and fertility in plant-based systems to support practicing and potential veganic farmers.
Article
Full-text available
Salinity is a paramount factor that poses challenges to agricultural productivity and sustainability. At the same time, fenugreek is valued as a forage crop for its medicinal properties in addition to its extensive edible use. The objective of this study is to explore how fertilization and salinity impact soil physical properties and root system development in fenugreek cultivation. A field experiment was established at the Agricultural University of Athens during growing seasons 2019-2020 (1st GS) and 2020-2021 (2nd GS) in a split-splot design with the 2 main salinity treatments (High salinity; HS & Conventional salinity; CS) and 5 fertilization treatments (biocyclic-vegan (BHS), manure (FYM), compost (COMP), inorganic fertilization (11-15-15) and the control (C). Soil porosity was statistically significantly affected by both salinity (p<=0.05) and fertilization (p<=0.001). Also, organic matter was significantly affected by fertilization (p<=0.001). HS (59.78±2.65) resulted in 20.02% fewer nodules on plant roots compared to CS treatments (71.75±2.65). The maximum number of nodules was recorded in the FYM treatment (68.93±0.77). In addition, mean root diameter was affected by fertilization (p<=0.01) COMP (2.92±0.31 mm) and NPK treatments (2.83±0.31 mm) resulted in 19.52% and 23.32% smaller root diameter respectively compared to BHS, while FYM (2.68±0.31 mm) resulted in a 30.22% smaller diameter. A significant increase of seed yield was noticed under organic fertilization where the highest yield of 2.1 t ha−1 was recorded in BHS (2nd GS). Although fenugreek was affected by high salinity, it demonstrated considerable resistance and maintained its yields, rendering it a crop suitable for challenging soils.
Preprint
Agriculture is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and biodiversity loss, mostly through deforestation for the cultivation of animal feeds; enteric fermentation from ruminants like cattle, fertilizers and manure; and soil degradation from intensive farming practices. There is currently a push to transform our farming systems to attempt to alleviate the almost-assured catastrophic burden of increasing amounts of atmospheric carbon. Many forms of agriculture claim they have evolved to follow a more regenerative form of agriculture by increasing soil organic matter (SOM), thus capturing said carbon in their soils. This study reports SOM results from one veganic agriculture (VA) farm from a study period of seven years. There was an observed increase of SOM from 5.2% to 7.2%, equating to an increase of 38.46% over the study’s duration, suggesting that VA is an effective farming mechanism for increasing soil organic matter utilizing 100% plant-based regenerative practices and materials to nourish the soil. The VA farm also realized respectable yields per hectare, reporting a 46% increase in total crop production. This was all achieved by growing a diversity of plant-based crops, implementing four-year crop rotations, building soil fertility through plant-based inputs, cover cropping, and leaving the farm’s fields covered as often as possible. Additionally, by its processes, the VA farm fully eliminated the industrial chain of animal agriculture and associated land use and methane emissions, suggesting VA to be a holistically regenerative form of agriculture, in comparison to animal-based forms of any other system.
Article
Climate change affects the sustainability of farming systems by downgrading soil fertility and diminishing crop yields. Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development Goals aims to achieve key performance indicators to convert effectually currently degraded agroecosystems into smart, climate-resilient, and profitable farming systems. The introduction of alternative crops could equilibrate the negative impact of increased temperatures and water scarcity to ensure sufficient farm profitability. Alternative crops such as quinoa, teff, tritordeum, camelina, nigella, chia, and sweet potato show a high acclimatization potential to various conditions and could be components of novel re-designed agroecosystems, satisfying the goals the EU Green Deal for reduced chemical input use by 2030. In certain occasions, they adapt even better than conventional or traditional crops and could be integrated in crop rotations, demonstrating multiple uses that would benefit farmers. This review aimed to (i) evaluate seven alternative crops based on their potential contribution to climate change mitigation, in compliance with the EU (European Union) Green Deal objectives and the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) of the UN (United Nations), and (ii) examine the factors that would determine their successful integration in the Mediterranean Basin. These limiting factors for crop establishment included (i) soil properties (soil texture, pH value, salinity, and sodicity), (ii) environmental parameters (temperature, altitude, latitude, photoperiod), and (iii) crop performance and dynamics regarding water demands, fertilization needs, light, and heat requirements. All proposed crops were found to be adaptable to the Mediterranean climate characteristics and promising for the implementation of the goals of EU and UN.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.