ArticlePDF Available

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
Introduction
African elephants (Loxodonta Africana) comprise two subspecies:
the savanna elephant (Loxodonta Africana) and forest elephant
(Loxodonta Africana cyclotis).1 These animals are found across Sub-
Saharan Africa, inhabiting swamp forests, savannas and desert.2
Savanna elephants live in Eastern and Southern Africa, whereas forest
elephants are predominantly found in Central Africa.3,4 Moreover,
both savanna and forests elephants can be found in small numbers in
Western Africa, although their taxonomic status remains undened.
Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol. 2018;3(5):379384. 379
© 2018 Ngcobo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
The future survival of African elephants: implications
for conservation
Volume 3 Issue 5 - 2018
Jabulani Nkululeko Ngcobo,1,2 Tshimangadzo
Lucky Nedambale,1 Khathutshelo Agree
Nephawe,1 Ewa Sawosz,2 André Chwalibog2,3
1Department of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of
Technolog y, South Africa
2Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, Warsaw
University of Life Sciences, Poland
3Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of
Copenhagen, Denmark
Correspondence: André Chwalibog, Department of
Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen,
Groennegaardsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark, Tel +4540
9635 73, Email ach@sund.ku.dk
Received: October 05, 2018 | Published: October 09, 2018
Abstract
In 2007 the elephant population in Africa was estimated at between 470,000 and
690,000. However, this population is rapidly decreasing. Today, African elephants
are highly endangered and are listed as ‘vulnerable’ on the International Union for
Conservation of Nature Red List. In this review, we outline the major factors affecting
the future survival of elephants. We identify elephant poaching in Central Africa as
the primary cause of elephants’ decline, and this issue has duly received the majority
of attention from conservationists and policy-makers. However, poaching is not the
only factor: climate change, habitat loss, and human-elephant conflict also have an
adverse impact, and all have received relatively little attention due to the predominant
focus on poaching.
Keywords: Loxodonta Africana, elephants, conservation, poaching, extinction
International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology
Review Article Open Access
Southern Africa hosts the majority (± 55%) of the continent’s
elephant population; Eastern Africa holds ±28%, while Central Africa
includes ±16%, and the remaining ±2% are found in Western Africa
(Figure 1). Management strategies are challenging.3 For instance,
in Western Africa, human population increase and the consequent
growth in human-elephant conict (HEC) has emerged as a highly
pertinent issue, to the extent that fewer elephants can be found in
Western Africa than in other regions.3,4
In 2007, Africa’s elephant population was estimated at between
470,000 and 690,000.3 However, these gures declined by 144,000
by 2014 and have continued shrinking by 8% every year (Figure 2).1
Between 2010 and 2012, ±100 000 elephants were killed.5 A principal
cause of the killing constituted illegal poaching and the trade of
wildlife products, especially ivory.6,7 Elephant poaching for ivory is
most reported in Central Africa,8 the largest amount in Tanzania.7
The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation 380
Copyright:
©2018 Ngcobo et al.
Citation: Ngcobo JN, Nedambale TL, Nephawe KA, et al. The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol.
2018;3(5):379384. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00123
Figure 1 Elephant population in African regions (Adopted from Nelleman C
et al.,2).
Figure 2 Africa’s elephant population trend (Adapted from Chase MJ et al.,1).
In Central Africa, more than 60% of elephants have been lost in the
past 15 years.9 The countries of Central African Republic and Somalia
have completely lost their elephant populations.7 This situation has
occurred in spite of the presence of mechanisms to prevent biodiversity
loss.10 Consequently, the African elephant has recently been listed as
vulnerable on the International Union for Conservation of Nature
Red List.4 Numerous factors jeopardize elephants’ survival and
affecting their conservation across Africa, with variations depending
on the region in question.4 For example, high levels of poaching
have been reported in Central Africa, while in Western Africa habitat
loss constitutes a signicant threat to elephant survival. In Southern
Africa, climate change represents a major issue for livestock11 and
wildlife survival.12 This literature review aims to elucidate the future
of Africa’s elephant populations, with particular emphasis placed on
human-elephant conict, habitat loss, climate change, and poaching,
as well as highlighting some mechanisms that may help preserve the
species.
Threats to the elephant population
Human-elephant conict
Human-elephant conict (HEC) is a signicant concern in the
conservation of species such as elephants and rhinos.13 Nevertheless, it
has received relatively little attention from managers, conservationists
and policy-makers due to the perceived salience of poaching.7
According to Dueveiller et al.,14 HEC occurs when human actions
cause an adverse effect on elephants, or vice versa. However, in a
practical perspective, no contestation can truly occur between animals
and humans because animals cannot consciously engage in such a
conict. Redpath et al.15 have described HEC: i) as an impact dealing
with the direct interaction between animals and humans; and ii) as
a conict centered on human interactions between those seeking to
conserve species and those who do not care or who do not understand
the value of conserving animal species.
When elephants’ activities intersect with those of humans, they can
pose a serious problem.16 For instance, when elephants compete with
humans for space and resources, signicant conict can arise.17 When
HEC occurs, not only is there a risk of property loss, but human safety
may also be jeopardized.18 Worldwide, numerous cases have been
described of people being killed by elephants, with HEC the principal
suspect. For instance, the Indian newspaper the Guardian has reported
of 15 people being trampled and killed by a single elephant in India.
Moreover, in response, most of the people affected demanded that the
elephant be killed. The HEC issue is expected to increase with the
growth of the human population in Africa.
HEC might also have an adverse effect on elephants. For example,
when elephants migrate to areas settled by humans, they may become
vulnerable to predation or poaching.19 Consequently, elephants
generally prefer places with fewer human activities.20 Nevertheless,
they require large amounts of space – preferably ±50 hectares per
elephant–as they tend to graze and browse large quantities of grass
and forages and require sufcient water and food.
The primary cause of HEC is generally considered competition
between domestic livestock and elephants for space for water and
grazing areas.20 Indeed, in general, domestic livestock (especially
cattle) graze on veld during the day and are conned in a kraal at
night.21 When they graze during the day, they tend to be guided by
headers. However, during the night elephants use the darkness to
search for food and may be shot by farmers where they affect crops.22
Habitat loss
Habitat loss constitutes a pertinent conservation issue.23 However,
it has received less attention from conservationists, elephant managers
and policy-makers due to the relative importance of the recent
upsurge in poaching.7 Forestry feeds wildlife and contains more
than 50% of plant species, rendering it the most important pillar in
the ecosystem.24 The reported overexploitation of forestry24 raises
numerous questions regarding the survival of wildlife.14 In 2007,
the land available for wildlife declined to ±15%.3 Indeed, between
2007 and 2015, a substantial decrease of 52 to 82% in Africa was
reported.7 Habitat destruction has been closely associated with human
population increase in many areas.13,25, 26 West Africa represents a
major site of habitat loss because many of its countries are seeing
increased pressure placed on natural areas for mining, logging and
the transformation of land for agricultural use.7 In Southern African
countries such as Botswana, habitat loss is less pronounced2 due
to small human populations and vast land availability, which can
accommodate both humans and wildlife.
Elephants are losing to human population increase in the battle for
space.19,27 They tend to be restricted to living in the center of forests
in order to avoid attacks from humans, including for the purpose of
poaching and resource exploitation.2 Furthermore, they require large
amounts of high-quality core forest soil.28 When a forest is deforested,
the thin, nutrient-rich soil is washed away, and it can take up to 50
years to recover.23,29 Hence, habitat destruction will become a long-
term threat to wildlife survival.2
The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation 381
Copyright:
©2018 Ngcobo et al.
Citation: Ngcobo JN, Nedambale TL, Nephawe KA, et al. The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol.
2018;3(5):379384. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00123
Climate change
Initially, climate change was associated with natural processes
such as the circulation of oceanic currents.29 However, today it
is increasingly believed that human activities such as fossil fuel
combustion, deforestation and industrial activities cause climate
change.30 High temperatures affect animals in different ways, but such
changes are particularly severe for those that cannot dissipate heat
easily, such as elephants.
High temperatures: Many species of mammals use sweat glands or
pant to cool down when air temperatures are high. However, elephants
do not have a sweat duct,31 rendering heat dissipation a major
issue.32 When temperatures are high, they must use non-evaporative
techniques11 such as apping their ears in order to maximize heat
transfer.32 They may also use behavioral strategies such as hiding in
shaded areas under trees.31
Drought: Elephants’ lives are contingent on the availability of
water.11 Elephants tend to congregate in areas with sufcient water to
drink and in which to bathe and play, especially in coastal lowlands
and along river valleys.33 This is essential because they require a
large amount of water, about 150-300 liters of water per day. During
drought events, elephants may die due to limited amounts of water
availability.32 Nevertheless, the effects of drought tend to be less
severe for desert-adapted elephants, such as those found in northern
Namibia and Central Africa.3
Interaction between climate change and HEC: Climate change
may enhance conict between humans and elephants as they must
compete for increasingly limited land, water and other natural
resources. Moreover, climate change may stimulate humans to
alter their living patterns and livelihoods. For example, increased
vulnerability to ooding may cause people to move and establish new
settlements in elephants’ habitats. Droughts may equally cause people
to migrate to other areas in search of food, fodder and water both for
themselves and for their livestock. In seasons with limited rainfall,
pasture fertility may be low and so fodder reserves for livestock are
also constrained.34 When farmers run out of fodder, they often seek
grazing areas elsewhere, especially in forests, which is where many
elephants live.
Elephant poaching
Poaching can be dened as the illegal killing of wildlife animals.11
According to CITES,9 poaching is a major and growing threat to
elephant populations (Figure 3). Indeed, the increase in the illegal trade
of wildlife products has driven biodiversity loss among elephants.6
Figure 3 Estimated illegal killing of elephants by poaching (PIKE) from 2002
to 2011 in Africa (Adapted from CITES9).
Numerous factors drive wildlife poaching, particularly of
elephants,2,35 including poverty and ivory and crop raiding.
Poaching driven by poverty: The overhunting of wildlife for human
consumption is well-documented and has resulted in the decline and
extinction of certain species.5 It appears to be connected in part to
poverty.36 Tusks tend to be particularly prized.2 Therefore, elephant
poaching should not be approached as a mere conservation concern,
but rather as an issue of poverty and development.11
Poverty and wildlife conservation have been connected by Adams
et al.36 in two important ways: i) poverty as the main constraint to
wildlife conservation via overhunting and poaching as a source of
income; and ii) attempts to reduce poverty in most African countries
are dependent on living animals, particularly wildlife animals.
Poaching for ivory
Elephant populations face high risks of extinction due to the ivory
trade.38 The majority of illegally killed elephants are found without
their tusks.2 For example, in Niokola-Koba National Park in Senegal,
the elephant population reached a maximum of 450 in 1979 before
drastically dropping to about 80 in 1984. The primary cause of decline
was ivory poaching by well-armed poachers.37 China is the largest
trader of ivory, followed by Thailand, and African elephants’ tusks are
especially common.2
Crop raiding
Killing represents a ‘quick x’ method that is primarily used in
The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation 382
Copyright:
©2018 Ngcobo et al.
Citation: Ngcobo JN, Nedambale TL, Nephawe KA, et al. The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol.
2018;3(5):379384. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00123
Africa by elephant authorities or affected people.38 In South Africa,
and especially in the Eastern Cape, elephants have been killed so that
they do not exceed certain numbers33 and trample crops. The issue is
that within an elephant population, it is difcult to identify a particular
culprit. In many cases, the wrong elephant is killed, which fails to
solve the problem.38 Even if the offender is killed, others potentially
replace it.19
What can be done?
Numerous measures can be taken to assist elephants in coping with
a changing climate. These include safeguarding elephants’ access to
water sources, whether natural or articial. Elephants require space
in which to roam, nd food and water as well as other elephants for
mating. Thus, securing land for elephants and enabling them to move
between them, in some cases across national borders, is necessary.
Deforestation is caused by imprudent land use as well as the
expansion of industrial areas.28 In Africa, the unregulated building of
shacks cannot be ignored. Therefore, organizations such as the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) should put mechanisms in place
to minimize deforestation. For instance, effective measures for the
management of deforestation and the practice of afforestation are yet
to be implemented.
It is also important to reduce pressure on elephants’ habitats.
This may be achieved by supporting community livelihood activities
to enable people to cope during livestock food shortages, such as
assisting in rangeland management to conserve fodder for livestock
so that cattle do not need to be grazed in pastures used by elephants.
Improvements to agricultural practices should also be made through
sustainable agriculture. Working with communities to undertake
land-use planning increases the space available for their activities,
including for livestock and agriculture as well as for elephants and
other wildlife.
In the case of crop raiding, elephants should not be killed. This is
because elephants are slow breeders. For instance, when an elephant
is killed it will take 15 years for a female to replace it. Therefore,
when raiding crops, elephants should either be denied food or given a
place in which to live.38
Identifying the principal causes of elephant poaching is complex.
However, it is well-acknowledged that China and Thailand are the
largest ivory traders,2 and ivory tends to be transported from Kenya,
Tanzania and South Africa. Therefore, improving and tightening law
enforcement may play a signicant role. For instance, collaborations
between the military, anti-poacher units and the police may help
ght poachers,2 and boost the elephant population in regions such
as Southern Africa.1 A similar strategy should also be implemented
in Western, Central and Eastern African regions, where poaching
represents a principal cause of elephants’ decline. Nevertheless, highly
trained anti-poachers will be required, necessitating considerable
nancial resources.
Elephants may also benet poor people living close to wildlife
parks through the development of tourism.39 Policy-makers, managers
and wildlife conservationists should develop sustainable means
of including elephants in tourism so that their conservation will be
guaranteed.40,41
The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation 383
Copyright:
©2018 Ngcobo et al.
Citation: Ngcobo JN, Nedambale TL, Nephawe KA, et al. The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol.
2018;3(5):379384. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00123
Conclusion
Elephants will soon become extinct if no proper conservation
strategies are implemented. This review has revealed that elephants
do not only face issues of poaching, but also habitat loss and climate
change connected with human activities. When all of these factors are
combined, they are capable of eradicating elephant populations across
Africa. This issue is particularly pertinent because Africa is comprised
of poor and developing countries. In most cases, the development
strategy is to expand industrial areas and agriculture in order to create
new job opportunities. More roads continue to be built and people
continue to move from rural to urban areas in search of superior jobs
and lifestyles. This alone may lead to elephants’ extinction through
habitat loss and global warming. People still need to be educated about
the value of elephants. However, given that many people in Africa are
illiterate, this will constitute a signicant challenge and will require
considerable nancial resources. Therefore, developed countries as
well as organizations such as the FAO and the United Nations might
play an important nancial role.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Erasmus+
Program at the Warsaw University of Life Sciences for providing the
course in Wildlife Biology and Conservation.
Conicts of interest
The authors declare no conicts of interest.
References
1. Chase MJ, Schlossberg S, Grifn CR, et al. Continent–wide survey
reveals massive decline in African savannah elephants. Peer J.
2016;4:e2354.
2. Nelleman C, Formo RK, Blanc J, et al. Elephants in the dust–the
African elephant crisis. A rapid response assessment. United Nations
Environment Programme, GRID–Arendal. 2013.
3. Blanc JJ, Barnes RFW, Craig GC, et al. African Elephant Status Report:
An update from the African Elephant Database. The World Conservation
Union. 2007.
4. Blanc JJ, Thouless CR, Hart JA, et al. African Elephant Status Report
2002: An update from the African Elephant Database. IUCN/SSC African
Elephant Specialist Group. Gland (Switzerland). 2003.
5. Wittemyer G, Northrup JM, Blanc J, et al. llegal killing for ivory drives
global decline in African elephants. Panas. 2014.
6. Beale CM, Hauenstein S, Mduma S, et al. Spatial analysis of aerial survey
data reveals correlates of elephant carcasses. Biological Conservation.
2018;218:258–267.
7. Thouless CR, Dublin HT, Blanc JJ, et al. African elephant status report
2016: An update from the African elephant database. Ocassional paper
of the IUCN species survival commission no. 60. 2016.
8. Van Kooten GC. Protecting the African elephant: A dynamic bioeconomic
model of ivory trade. Biological Conservation. 2008; 141:2012–2022.
9. CITES. 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES.
Switzerland: Global Species Programme, WWF factsheet; 2004.
10. Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, et al. The biodiversity of species and
their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Biodiversity status.
2014;344:987–996.
11. Dunkin RC, Wilson D, Way N, et al. Climate inuences thermal balance
and water use in African and Asian elephants: physiology can predict
drivers of elephant distribution. Journal of Experimental Biology.
2013;216:2939–2952.
12. Harvell D, Altizer S, Cattadori IM, et al. Climate change and wildlife
diseases: When does the host matter the most? Ecological Society of
America. 2009;90:912–920.
13. Theuerkauf J, Ellenberg H, Waitkuwait WE, Mühlenberg M. Forest
elephant distribution and habitat use in the Bossematié forest reserve,
Ivory Coast. Pachyderm. 2001;30:2001:37–43.
14. Duveiller G, Defourny P, Desclée B, et al. Deforestation in Central
Africa: estimates at regional, national and landscape levels by advanced
processing of systematically–distributed Landsat extracts. Small
Ruminant Research. 2008;112:1969–1981.
15. Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, et al. Understanding and managing
conservation conicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013;28:100–
109.
16. Treves A, Wallace RB, Naughton–Treves L, Morales A. Co–managing
human–wildlife conicts: A review. Journal of Human Dimensions of
Wildlife. 2006;11:383–396.
17. Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, et al. The future of biodiversity.
Science, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete. 1995;347–350.
18. Choudhury A. Human–elephant conicts in Northeast India. Journal of
Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 2004;9:261–270.
19. Hoare R. Management implications of new research on problem
elephants. Pachyderm. 2001;30:44–48.
20. Graham MD, Douglas–Hamilton I, Adams WM, et al. The movement of
African elephants in a human–dominated land–use mosaic. Journal of
Animal Conservation. 2009;12:445–455.
21. Mavule BS, Muchenje V, Kunene NW. Characterization of Zulu sheep
production system: Implications for conservation and improvement.
Academic Journal of Scientic Research and Essay. 2013;8(26):1226–
1238.
22. Sitati NW, Walpole MJ, Leader–Williams N. Factors affecting
susceptibility of farms to crop raiding by African elephants: using a
predictive model to mitigate conict. Journal of Applied Ecology.
2005;42:1175–1182.
23. UNEP, CITES, IUCN, TRAFFIC. Elephants in the Dust–The African
Elephant Crisis. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations
Environment Programme, GRID–Arendal. 2013.
24. Mayaux P, Holmgren P, Achard F, et al. Tropical forest cover change in
the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philosophical Transaction
of Royal Society. 2005;360:373–384.
The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation 384
Copyright:
©2018 Ngcobo et al.
Citation: Ngcobo JN, Nedambale TL, Nephawe KA, et al. The future survival of African elephants: implications for conservation. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol.
2018;3(5):379384. DOI: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00123
25. Bandara R, Tisdell C. Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the
conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidence.
Biological Conservation. 2003;113:327–342.
26. Neupane D, Kunwar S, Bohara AK, Risch TS. Willingness to pay for
mitigating human–elephant conict by residents of Nepal. Journal for
Nature Conservation. 2017;36:65–76.
27. Kansky R, Knight AT. Key factors driving the attitudes towards
large mammals in conict with humans. Biological Conservation.
2014;179:93–105.
28. Kinnaird MF, Sanderson ER, O’Brien TG, et al. Deforestation trends in
a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals.
Conservation Biology. 2003;17:245–257.
29. Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, et al. Effects of environmental change on
emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1395–1405.
30. Shine KP. Radiative forcing of climate change. Space science review.
2000;94:363–373.
31. Wright PG. Why do elephants ap their ears? South African Journal of
Zoology. 1984;19:266–269.
32. Williams TM. Heat transfer in elephants: thermal partitioning based on
skin temperature proles. Zoological Society of London. 1990;222:235–
245.
33. Kerley GIM, Landman M. The impacts of elephants on biodiversity in
the Eastern Cape Subtropical Thickets. South African Journal of Science.
2006;102:395–402.
34. Toulmin C. Drought and the farming sector: Loss of farm animals and
post–drought rehabilitation. African livestock policy analysis network,
International livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 1986.
35. Duffy R, ST John FAV, Büscher B, et al. Toward a new understanding
of the links between poverty and illegal wildlife hunting. Conservation
Biology. 2016;30(1):14–22.
36. Adams WM, Aveling R, Brokington D, et al. Biodiversity conservation
and the eradication of poverty. Science. 2004;303:1146–1149.
37. Bouche P, Douglas–Hamilton I, Wittemyer G, et al. Will elephants soon
disappear from West African Savannahs? Plos One. 2011.
38. Hoare RE, Du Toit JT. Co–existence between people and elephants in
African savannahs. Society for Conservation Biology. 1999;13:633–639.
39. Whyte I, Van Aarde R, Pimm SL. Managing the elephants of Kruger
National Park. Animal Conservation. 1998;1:77–83.
40. Maisels F, Strindberg S, Blake S, et al. Devastating decline of forest
elephants in Central Africa. PLoS One. 2013.
41. Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, et al. Understanding and managing
conservation conicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013;28:100–
109.
... Over the previous three generations, the population of koalas has decreased by more than 30% [22]. In addition to the amount needed for bathing and playing, elephants require 150-300 liters of water per day for drinking [23]. Droughts can lead to population loss. ...
... The gender population of sea turtles is changing as a result of climate change, with females outnumbering males. Certain locations may wind up producing exclusively female turtles, putting local species at risk of extinction due to a lack of mating partners for female turtles [1,8,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. ...
Article
Climate change occurs as a result of the consistent alterations of the normal atmospheric weather conditions that result in an imbalance of the earth’s climate, caused by the radiations from chemical, biological, or natural sources, leading to an increased surface temperature that is capable of causing an intense threat to human's life, plants, animals, and the planet ecosystem. The purpose of this study is to alert the world about the dangers associated with climate change and the factors capable of causing climate change. This study also reveals the top 10 countries that contribute the most to climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases and other factors. Finally, this study will help to inform the world about the most vulnerable countries to climate change in a ranking format from the most affected to the least. We used an MCDM technique called fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (F-PROMETHEE) to rank the most vulnerable countries to climate change. We considered 14 countries that have been severely affected by climate change, and we evaluated them based on seven criteria. Results indicated that China is the highest contributor to climate change as they emit (9,300 million tons) of greenhouse gases, followed by the USA (4,800 Mt), and Saudi Arabia (532.2 Mt) occupies the tenth position as the countries that make this planet a risk zone for humans, plants, and animals. Results from the PROMETHEE approach show that Mozambique is the most vulnerable country to climate change, followed by India, and then Japan.
... The mathematical model shows for this area an average of 14,448,324 for 2000 kg/hm 2 and 41,418,530 for 6000 kg/hm 2 , obtaining an average of 27,933,427 specimens, with an ideal population density of 1.47 E/km 2 , which is substantially consistent with the number of the population expressed by Nowak (1999). Congruent to what was said by Ngcobo et al. (2018), who states that L. africana currently requires large spaces, preferably ± 50 hectares. We thus feel confident that the model is adequate to infer and to estimate the populations of Mammuthus columbi. ...
... This phenomenon would occur due to the system's possible saturation, increasing competition in the population of mammoths in the area. According to Nowak (1999) and Ngcobo et al. (2018), current African elephant populations move great distances in search of food and water, of which they require between 150 and 300 litres/day. Wall (2015) expresses through geospatial analysis in the Republic of Mali (Africa) that Loxodonta africana travels up to 42.87 km/24 hours, with estimated speeds of 5.78 km/h. ...
Article
Mathematical models are a helpful tool that can help paleoecology research advance in similar ways as the ones already used in theoretical ecology. In this article, we use a mathematical model based on differential equations to estimate the past Mammuthus columbi population in the Valsequillo Basin, Puebla, Mexico. We calibrated the model based on the biological and etiologic parameters of the African elephant Loxodonta africana. In addition to the mean population, the analysis allows inferring the population dynamics of the M. columbi on the Valsequillo Basin. The model is based on the ecological interactions between M. columbi and its food resource. It was found that the population must have been oscillating before an equilibrium was reached. Several potential scenarios based on on-site food production (grass) are here analyzed. It was found that a good efficiency of the M. columbi to find food can lead to recurrent cycles of abundance and famine. In this situation, the M. columbi populations must have emigrate and then immigrate in periodic circles to avoid starvation
... Climate change exposes animals to a variety of stressors, influencing metabolic and endocrine functions, with potential consequences for the survival of species [14,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. With climate change, more animal species are going extinct every year. ...
... Elephants require 150-300 liters of water per day for drinking in addition to the amount needed for bathing and playing. Droughts can cause population decline (Figure 12) [25]. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Climate is changing in an accelerating pace. Climate change occurs as a result of an imbalance between incoming and outgoing radiation in the atmosphere. The global mean temperatures may increase up to 5.4°C by 2100. Climate change is mainly caused by humans, especially through increased greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change is recognized as a serious threat to ecosystem, biodiversity, and health. It is associated with alterations in the physical environment of the planet Earth. Climate change affects life around the globe. It impacts plants and animals, with consequences for the survival of the species. In humans, climate change has multiple deleterious consequences. Climate change creates water and food insecurity, increased morbidity/mortality, and population movement. Vulnerable populations (e.g., children, elderly, indigenous, and poor) are disproportionately affected. Personalized adaptation to the consequences of climate change and preventive measures are key challenges for the society. Policymakers must implement the appropriate strategies, especially in the vulnerable populations.
... Recently, (Ngcobo et al., 2018) studied the future survival of the African elephants in which they reported a serious extinction threat especially due to climate change impacts. The implication of climate change related warming on local elephants is dire given that these animals have no sweat ducts (Williams,1990) .Their heat dissipation is problematic (Blanc et al.,2007).Ordinarily, they use other nonevaporative techniques such as ; ear flapping in order to maximize heat transfer (Wright,1984) or hide in shaded areas under trees. ...
... An elephant herd congregating at a water point, on the right, two elephants, playing in a pool of water (Photo credit as cited byNgcobo et al., 2018) ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Every wildlife species has a language or 'signal' for communication both within and without. In addition, the interaction between wildlife species and their natural habitat is usually a balanced system. But it is always the entry of man and his insatiable exploitative appetite into this union that is the cause of problems in this natural ecosystem. The case of land use and land use change comes into focus particularly the ones that lead to wildlife habitat fragmentation. A lot of pioneer ecological studies have looked at the effect of landscape modification on the life of wildlife. Very few, if any, have attempted to assess the inaudible voices from the wildlife habitat as a response to the said modifications. This paper used Narration Review (NR) method to analyze previous elephants' behavior observation study projects in Tsavo and Amboseli ecosystems in Kenya. A total of five papers were identified for sysnthesis.All the five papers discussed the response of elephants in terms of usage of wildlife crossing structures (CS) that were installed during the construction of Mombasa-Nairobi leg of Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) project that was commissioned in 2017. It was established that understanding the behavior of elephants in their local rangeland can help position crossings for landscape connectivity. Secondly, the SGR project's operation has come with an increasing trend of elephants' mortality in some of its corridor locations. Interestingly however, it was reported that elephant's high cognitive intelligence facilitates their faster learning of use of crossing underpasses compared to the rate of response by other wildlife species. The paper recommends for the initiation of more animals' behavior observation projects to help in development planning decision on their ethical treatments. This study contributes to the entrenchment of sustainability thinking in wildlife conservation efforts in the face of piquing demand for infrastructure development, especially in the sub Saharan Africa region which still has a huge gap.
... The shrinking elephant habitat forces them into closer proximity to human settlements, resulting in conflict over resources, crop raids, and human fatalities (White and Ward 2010;Liu et al. 2016). Nonetheless, due to the apparent magnitude of poaching, the issue of human-elephant conflict received relatively limited attention from executives, environmentalists, and policymakers (Thouless et al. 2016;Chwalibog et al. 2018). In addition, Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC) could worsen due to habitat loss, degradation, and climate change (Shaffer et al. 2019). ...
Article
This research aimed to evaluate elephant habitat conditions in the Sai Yok National Park, Thailand, using high-resolution Pléiades imagery and InVEST Model's Habitat Quality Assessment (HQA) model. Land use was also analyzed as an input in the model using feature selection via the Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classification using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm. The risk and vulnerability of the elephant habitat were analyzed using several corresponding indices to understand the spatial distribution of anthropogenic activities and point out the areas for immediate conservation needs. The research results show a rapid change in land use between 2013 and 2022, with forest cover significantly decreasing and cultivated land increasing. Habitat degradation index data indicates that changes in land use have resulted in a significant decline in habitat quality due to palpable human pressure. This study also highlighted the eastern boundary of the study region as a possible risk zone for elephant habitat, where the tourism sector is expanding. Despite the potential to improve local livelihoods, these economic activities would eventually negatively influence elephant habitats. The integration of decision support technology with the results provided by this study can help stakeholders and policymakers create sustainable land-use plans that are ecologically diligent.
... An exponential increase in the human population in Asia has caused an increase in the conversion of natural habitat to human landscapes, bringing elephants and humans into greater contact and conflict. The conservation of Asian and African elephants is a global concern due to their endangered status and their ecological and cultural significance (Cabral de Mel et al., 2022, p. 2965Chwalibog et al., 2018). However, while mitigation strategies have been implemented to address HEC, their overall effectiveness on a broader scale remains to be tested (Shaffer et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a major problem that causes loss of life to both humans and elephants. While HEC risk models have been developed in past studies, there has not been any HEC risk models developed for the country with the highest annual HEC-related elephant deaths which is Sri Lanka. Thus, this study aims to develop a nationwide model to predict the risk of HEC and identify the most significant predictor variables for HEC in Sri Lanka. HEC risk variables and thirteen predictor variables were prepared using GIS tools. The MaxEnt application was used to input the risk variables (as presence points) and predictor variables (as environmental layers) and model the probability of HEC risk at 500m resolution. The modeling showed that distance to elephant distribution areas was the most important predictor variable for HEC, followed by vegetation area, elevation, range-land area, population density, and agricultural area. The results are supported by past studies that show the preference of elephants to remain within their usual range, but venturing out for food and water when resources are lacking. This is the first study to develop a nationwide HEC risk map for Sri Lanka using machine learning.
... This means that South African indigenous sheep lambs and weaned at any time of the year. Therefore, provided the negative effects posed by the climate change, this implies that, lamb mortality will increase in the occasions where climate is unfavourable (Ngcobo et al., 2018). This will thus reduce the number of replacement ewes and rams, sink the selection intensity and complement inbreeding (Selepe et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of age and live body weight on the oestrus response, duration, pregnancy rate and lambing rate among South African indigenous sheep breeds (Zulu sheep = 36, Bapedi sheep = 26, Damara sheep = 10 and Namaqua Afrikaner sheep = 9). Control Intravaginal Drug Release Dispensers (CIDR's) were inserted into the vagina for 10 days. The twitching of tail and standing to be mounted in the presence of the teaser ram were most targeted signs of oestrus. Data were subjected to an appropriate analysis of variance (ANOVA). The scores were subjected to 1:1 Frequency table and a Chi-Square (²) test for the equal proportions test. One Bapedi ewe loss CIDR before removal date hence was removed from the experimental animals. All Namaqua Afrikaner (100%) ewes responded to the synchronization protocol with the longest oestrus duration (70.7±7.2 h). However, Namaqua Afrikaner sheep scored the lowest rate for conception (44%) and lambing (44%). No significant different (P>0.05) observed for the onset of oestrus among the breeds. Four years old ewes responded better to oestrus synchronization than ≤3, 5 and ≥6 years. Nevertheless, ewes that were ≥6 years old had higher conception rate (94%) and lambing rate (84%). Zulu sheep had higher (89%) lambing rate than Damara (60%) sheep and Namaqua Afrikaner (44%) sheep. Lighter ewes had higher conception (83%) and lambing rate (90%) than heavier (77 and 64%) and moderate (68 and 78%) weights, respectively. In conclusion, Zulu sheep were more fertile than other South African indigenous breeds following oestrus synchronization. On the other hand, young ewes (≤3 years) produced heavier lambs and weaning weight but had higher mortality rate due to inexperience.
... There is some evidence, at least for elephants, that competition with humans for limited resources (i.e. water, suitable habitat), which will become increasingly limited due to climate change, may lead to increased poaching losses (Ngcobo et al., 2018). Our understanding of the combined effects of poaching and rainfall, however, is minimal, likely due to large herbivores' longevity, and the time lags in demographic responses (Milner et al., 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
Large herbivores, particularly in water limited systems, are vulnerable to the impacts of poaching (illegal hunting) and human‐induced climate changes. However, we have little understanding of how these processes can reshape their populations. With some rapidly declining populations there is a need to understand the effects of these stressors on populations of vulnerable large herbivores like the white rhino (Ceratotherium simum simum). We developed age‐structured models for the rhino population in Kruger National Park, home to 49% of South Africa’s rhinos. We wanted to determine the relative influence of poaching and climate on the current and future population size and demographics, examine the potential of a dependency effect (the loss of calves from poached females) and quantify the compound effect (loss of future young). Our results indicated that population declines were largely driven by poaching and included a dependency effect. Rainfall had a measurable but smaller influence on rhino populations and had an additive effect; reduced rainfall exacerbated poaching losses. Current poaching levels have resulted in a reduction to the lifetime reproductive output per cow from approximately 6 to 0.7 calves: a compound effect of 5.3 future offspring. Under current levels of poaching, we project a 35% decline in the Kruger rhino population in the next 10 years. However, if poaching intensity is cut in half, we project a doubling of the current population over the same time frame. Overall, our models showed little sensitivity to demographic and environmental parameters, except for adult survival. Our results suggest that maintaining and improving the lifetime reproductive output of rhino cows should thus be the highest management priority and that new management targets should consider both the dependency and compound effects associated with poaching on rhino cows.
Article
Full-text available
The conflict between humans and wildlife can result in negative impacts on both parties and hinder conservation efforts. By predicting how conflict risks may change with a growing agricultural sector and human population under a changing climate, policymakers can effectively allocate resources for mitigating and conserving conflict-prone species and regions. This study investigated the drivers of human�elephant conflict in Lupane, Zimbabwe, emphasizing the role of climate change and variability. Using an ethnographic approach informed by the sustainable livelihoods framework and political ecology, it examined how changing climatic conditions, such as water shortages, rising temperatures, and diminishing grazing, exacerbate conflicts between humans and elephants. These challenges have led to increased human intrusion into elephant territories, driven by collapsing rain-fed agriculture and a need for diversification into forestry-based livelihoods. The consequences of this conflict have been severe, resulting in injuries, deaths, damage to crops and infrastructure, economic losses, and food insecurity for affected households. As human populations grow and the impacts of climate change become more pronounced, the risk and geographical spread of human-elephant conflict are expected to escalate. The study highlights the importance of understanding these dynamics to inform policymakers in resource allocation for conflict mitigation and conservation efforts. It also critiques existing institutional support systems for addressing human-elephant conflict, assessing their climate sensitivity. To enhance sustainability, the research advocates for integrating empirical data on human-wildlife coexistence into international conservation policies and developing comprehensive, long-term strategies at a transboundary level, particularly in the context of climate change.
Article
Full-text available
Climate change and anthropogenic factors’ impact on habitat loss is a growing problem that is influencing unsustainable wildlife local-population home range shifts and triggering an increase in human–wildlife conflict (HWC). Yet, keystone species involved in HWC such as elephants play a vital role in nature-based ecosystem services and have important economic and cultural value to the people that are living with them. To understand how climate change and anthropogenic factors affect habitat loss and elephants’ home range shift, the movement of Namib desert-dwelling elephants was monitored and observed in the Ugab River basin between February 2018 and November 2020 at fortnight intervals. There are 87 elephants in the Ugab River basin that are distributed into two subpopulations: desert-dwelling elephants (N = 28) and semi-desert-dwelling elephants (N = 59). To achieve the objective of the study, land cover change, elephant movement, rainfall, and temperature data were analysed using ArcGIS spatial and statistical tools, such as image analysis, optimised hot spot analysis (OHSA), and cost distance analysis, to distinguish habitat vegetation changes and home range shifts and how these link to emerging human–elephant conflict (HEC) hot spots. Human farming activities, poor rainfall, and frequent droughts are responsible for the loss of habitat of around 73.0% in the lower catchment of the ephemeral river streams; therefore, the urgency of conserving and sustaining these habitats and desert-dwelling elephants is discussed here.
Article
Full-text available
Growth of the illegal wildlife trade is a key driver of biodiversity loss, with considerable research focussing on trafficking and trade, but rather less focussed on supply. Elephant poaching for ivory has driven a recent population decline in African elephants and is a typical example of illegal wildlife trade. Some of the heaviest poaching has been in Southern Tanzania's Ruaha-Rungwa ecosystem. Using data from three successive aerial surveys and modern spatial analysis techniques we identify the correlates of elephant carcasses within the ecosystem, from which important information about how poachers operate can be gleaned. Carcass density was highest close to wet-season (but not dry season) waterholes, at higher altitudes and at intermediate travel cost from villages. We found no evidence for an ecosystem-wide impact of ranger patrol locations on carcass abundance, but found strong evidence that different ranger posts showed contrasting patterns in relation to carcasses, some being significantly associated with clusters of carcasses, others showing the expected negative correlation and most showing no pattern at all. Despite a spatial change in elephant carcass locations between years, we find little evidence to suggest poachers have changed their behaviour in relation to key modelled covariates. Our maps of poaching activity can feed directly into anti-poaching control measures, but also provide general insights into how illegal harvest of high value wildlife products occurs in the field, and our spatio-temporal analysis provides a valuable analysis framework for aerial survey data from protected areas globally.
Article
Full-text available
Human-elephant Conflict (HEC) is a significant problem in Nepal, with approximately two-thirds of households being impacted by elephants (Elephas maximus), particularly during the winter. In addition to elephant casualties, more than 10% of the households surveyed have had human casualties (injury or death) during the past 5 years. This study evaluates the economic viability of elephant conservation in Nepal within the context of current and proposed HEC mitigation scenarios. Face-to-face interviews were carried out using a structured questionnaire to elicit the residents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for elephant conservation and HEC mitigation programs using seemingly unrelated regression (SUR). Residents’ WTP was found to be positively related to income and education, and negatively related to damage-related programs. Local stakeholders were willing to pay about 42% more to programs that were economically transparent and improved upon existing management. Residents’ WTP were also greater if they have had previous HEC-related injuries or deaths.
Article
Full-text available
African elephants (Loxodonta africana) are imperiled by poaching and habitat loss. Despite global attention to the plight of elephants, their population sizes and trends are uncertain or unknown over much of Africa. To conserve this iconic species, conservationists need timely, accurate data on elephant populations. Here, we report the results of the Great Elephant Census (GEC), the first continent-wide, standardized survey of African savannah elephants. We also provide the first quantitative model of elephant population trends across Africa. We estimated a population of 352,271 savannah elephants on study sites in 18 countries, representing approximately 93% of all savannah elephants in those countries. Elephant populations in survey areas with historical data decreased by an estimated 144,000 from 2007 to 2014, and populations are currently shrinking by 8% per year continent-wide, primarily due to poaching. Though 84% of elephants occurred in protected areas, many protected areas had carcass ratios that indicated high levels of elephant mortality. Results of the GEC show the necessity of action to end the African elephants' downward trajectory by preventing poaching and protecting habitat.
Article
Full-text available
Conservation organizations have increasingly raised concerns about escalating rates of illegal hunting and trade in wildlife. Previous studies have concluded that people hunt illegally because they are financially poor or that they lack alternative livelihood strategies. However, there has been little attempt to develop a richer understanding of the motivations behind contemporary illegal wildlife hunting. As a first step this paper analyses academic and policy literatures and engages in key debates in the social sciences about the meanings of poverty and the relative importance of structure and individual agency. We place motivations for illegal wildlife hunting within the context of the complex history of how wildlife laws were initially designed and enforced. We also consider the nature of poverty and the reasons for economic deprivation in particular communities. We conclude that there is a need for a much better understanding of what poverty is and what motivates people to hunt illegally. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Book
Full-text available
An Africa-wide overview of the distribution, abundance and conservation issues of African elephants as at the end of 2006. The introductory section is comprised of a short review outlining the background of the African Elephant Database, a discussion on the types of data and how is is it interpreted in the compilation of the report, and a descriptive text focused on the organization of the report. The body of the report initially presents the data at the continental level, following this data from the regions of Central Eastern, Southern and West Africa are presented with range states within each region reviewed in alphabetical order. Elephant population estimates and distributions from 37 range states in sub-Saharan Africa is consistently reviewed in concise text, clear tabular statistics and attractive population distribution maps. A comprehensive bibliography directly associated with the mapped information and three appendices, a quality index on the data, a comparative listing of estimates from regions and some protected areas in Eastern and Southern African countries, and an alphabetical listing of protected areas which fall within the elephant range throught the continent,complete the report.
Article
Full-text available
The pressing problem of human–elephant conflict has attracted considerable conservation interest and is increasingly being studied in Africa under an initiative spearheaded by AfESG. Important ideas are beginning to emerge from recent research that may be directly relevant to managing ‘problem elephants’. One of these concerns the persistence of problem elephant behaviour in many populations, even when identified culprit individuals are regularly removed from these populations over a long period. Rather than having a few habitual problem animals that can be removed, it is possible that elephant populations have what may be termed a problem component. As animals comprising this component are removed, for example by killing or translocating them, others take their place. If this problem component theory is true, it implies that either killing or translocation options, if chosen, will have to continue indefinitely. This reasoning is difficult to test but is supported by considerable circumstantial evidence and does agree with accepted principles in agricultural pest control. Merely killing individuals of a pest species seldom has much impact on the problem and most pests are effectively controlled only by denying them either their target food or a nearby refuge.
Article
The blood flow in the ear of the African elephant Loxodonta africana was measured In anaesthetized animals using the dye dilution technique at the same time as the arterio-venous temperature difference. The calculated heat loss from the ear is shown to be a substantial proportion of the total metabolic heat-loss requirement calculated from body surface area estimations. Reasons are advanced for believing that ear blood flow is controlled in the interests of thermoregulation. Behavioural fanning activity and the large ear surface area and surface to volume ratio suggest that this organ is of major importance in thermoregulation under warm environmental conditions.