Content uploaded by James Doss-Gollin
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by James Doss-Gollin on Oct 22, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Designing and Operating Infrastructure for
Nonstationary Flood Risk Management
Columbia Water Center
Thanks
water.columbia.edu
Nonstationarity
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
1900 1950 2000
Date
River Stage [m]
Río Paraguay at Asunción
Data: DINAC Paraguay
4
6
8
1900 1950 2000 2050
Water Year
Ann−Max River Stage [m]
MLE Estimates
Observed Data
Lienar Trend; N=40
Linear Trend; N=20
Linear Trend; All Years
Figure 1:
Nonstationarity
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
1900 1950 2000
Date
River Stage [m]
Río Paraguay at Asunción
Data: DINAC Paraguay
4
6
8
1900 1950 2000 2050
Water Year
Ann−Max River Stage [m]
MLE Estimates
Observed Data
Lienar Trend; N=40
Linear Trend; N=20
Linear Trend; All Years
Figure 1:
Flood Frequency Analysis
Today
Flood Frequency Analysis
Today
Generating Streamflow Sequences
P=π(−π)
(−π)π.
T= π
µ(t) = µ+β(t−t) St=
µ+β(t−t) St=
σ(t)∝µ(t)
log Q(t)µ(t), σ(t)∼ N (µ(t), σ(t)).
Fitting Synthetic Streamflow Sequences
N
pT=Q(t)≥QT
stan
pT(t)
Variance Decomposition
=+
=E(pT−ˆ
pT)
= (E[ˆ
pT]−pT)
=V[ˆ
pT]
Variance Decomposition
=+
=E(pT−ˆ
pT)
= (E[ˆ
pT]−pT)
=V[ˆ
pT]
Stationary* Process
Figure 2: N=,M=
Stationary* Process, Stationary Model
Figure 3:
M,N
Trend Process
Figure 4: N=,M=
Trend Process, Stationary Model
Figure 5:
M,N
Trend Process, Trend Model
N M
N M
Discussion & Future Work
M
M
References i
Journal Of Statistical Software
Journal of Machine
Learning Research
Water Resources Research
10.1029/2001WR000495
Application of Frequency and Risk in
Water Resources
10.1007/978-94-009-3955-4_23
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:2(125)