ChapterPDF Available

Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities

Authors:

Abstract

This chapter shows that agency and communion are essential to understanding the psychology of gender. Gender stereotypes, in their descriptive and prescriptive forms, follow from a societal division of labor whereby women tend to be concentrated in communally demanding roles and men in agentically demanding roles. People’s inferences of communal and agentic traits underlying the typical role behaviors of women and men yield gender stereotypes. These stereotypes in turn can enhance or compromise the ability of women and men to occupy and succeed in social roles that demand agentic or communal qualities. To the extent that people internalize stereotypes pertaining to their gender, they gain gender identities by which women regard themselves as especially communal and men as especially agentic. In addition, these identities and related personal goals regulate the attraction of each sex to social roles that afford opportunities to meet communal or agentic goals.
AGENCY AND
COMMUNION IN
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Andree E. Abele qnd Bogdan Woiciszke
Hl**,:ss:"",
LONDON AND NEWYORK
First published2019
by Routledge
2ParkSquare, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routiedge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an irnprint of theTaylor E Francis Group, an infotma business
@ 2OIg seiection and editorial matter, Abele Brehm and Bogdan
Wojciszke ; individual chapters, the contributors
The right of Abele Brehm and Bogdan'wojciszke to be identified as the
authori of the editorial material, "od of th. authors for their individual
chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
A1l rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced
or utf,ised in any form Är by any electronic' mechanical, or other
means, oow knowo o, he.eaftei invented, including photocopying and
recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks
or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in'Publication Data
A catalogue ,ecord fo. tttit book is available from the British Library
Library of ,Congress Ciataloging-in-Publication Data
R catalog record has been requested for this book
ISBN: 978-1 -138-57 A26-9 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1 -138-57027 -6 (Pbk)
ISBN: 978-0 -2ß:7 A366-3 (ebk)
Typeset in Bembo
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
9
AGENCY AND COMMUNION
Their implications for gender stereotypes
and gender identities
Sabine Sczesny, Christa Nater, and Alice H. Eagly
Agency and comnunion represent the two fundamental modalities of human nalure.
These dimensions, the so-called Big Two, represent self- versus other-orientation.
As srated by Abele and 'Wojciszke (2014, p. 196), "Agentic content refers to goal-
achievement and task functioning (competence, assertiveness, decisiveness), whereas
communal content refers to the maintenance of relationships and sociai function-
ing (benevolence, trustworthiness, morality)." These dimensions constitute meta-
concepts of human values, motives, traits, and behaviors. As we explain in this
chapter, agency and communion are essential to the analysis of gender stereotypes
and identities and their consequences.
Gender stereotypes: descriptive and prescriptive
Gender stereotypes are broadly defined as people's consensuai beließ about the
attributes of women and men. These stereotypes are culturally shared beließ and
can be descriptiue, pertaining to the characteristics of women and rnen, and prescrip-,
tiue, pertaining to the characteristics that women and men should or shouid not
have (Prentice & Catanza, 2A02). These stereotypes take the form of cognitive
schemas, or sets of beließ about each sex'
To assess gender stereotypes, researchers often have asked participants to rate
a typical woman or man, or women and men in general, on a variety of traits,
inciuding agentic (e.g., ambitious, assertive) and communal (e.g., caring, sensitive)
attributes. Although these direct, or explicit, measures are common, implicit rnea-
sures have produced similar findings (e.g., Rudman & Goodwin, 2004).
Results of such studies have shown that women are perceived as more com-
munal and less agentic than men (Williams & Best, 1982). Men are and should be
assertive and competitive but not weak, whereas women are and should be socially
sensitive and compassionate but not dominant. Although these gender stereotypes
104 Sabine Sczesny et al.
are present in most cultures, an exception is the greater communion ascribed to
men in some East Asian cultures (Cuddy et al., 201,5; Steinmetz, Bosak, Sczesny, &
Eagly, 2014). Also, as generally less salient themes, gender stereotypes include
beliefs about the cognitive abilities, role behaviors, occupations, and physical attri-
butes of men and women (e.g., Deaux & Lewis, 1984; Diekman & Eagly, 2000).
Another aspect of gender stereotypes is their relation to the societal status of
men and women. Specifically, agentic traits associated with men are linked with
high status, and communal traits associated with women are linked with low
status (e.g., Conway, Pizzamigiio, & Mount, 1996;). Finally, although the lower
societal status of women might suggest that the female stereotype is more negative
than the male stereotype, the female stereotype is the more evaluatively positive
stereotype, mainly due to the very positive value placed on communal qualities
such as kindness and consideration (Eagiy & Mladinic, 1994).
Sources of gender stereotypes
In general, gender stereotypes arise from life experiences in a given cultural con-
text. Because the sorting of women and men into different social roles produces
differences in their everyday behaviors, role behavior is a key source of what
people observe and thus represent in their beließ about the sexes. Consistent with
the correspondent inference principle (Gilbert & Malone,1995), people infer the
traits of men and women from observations of their behavior and generally do so
spontaneously. Because most behaviors are performed to enact social roles, the dis-
tribution of women and men into roles underlies gender stereotypes. For example,
observations of mainly women caring for children contribute to the beließ that
women are compassionate and kind.
The specific activities that comprise a division of labor derive in part from male
and female biology - rhat is, their evolved physical attributes, especially women's
reproductive activities and men's size and strength, which can al1ow some activi-
ties to be more efficiently performed by one sex or the other, depending on the
socioeconomic and ecological context. Human biology rhus interacts with the
environment to produce a division of labor.'Within societies, the division of labor
is perpetuated and legitimized through the formation of gender stereotypes rhat
make the contemporaneous division of labor seem natural and inevitable.
Although preindustrial societies offered various divisions of labor, a male bread-
winner and female homemaker arrangement emerged along with industrialization
and urbanizatton in F,urope and North America (Janssens, I997).In contemp otary
industrialized and postindustrial societies, given low birthrates and shortened or
optional lactation, women's reproductive activities are a much weaker constraint
on their activities. Therefore, both women and men typically engage in paid labor.
However, in an arrangement that might be called a neotraditional diuision of labor,
men generally have longer employment hours, and women continue to spend more
time than men on unpaid domestic work (Cohn, 2017). Also, despite a decrease
over time in the sex segregation of occupations in many industrialized nations (e.g.,
lmplications for Gender 105
Lippa, Preston, & Penner, 2014), nren still dominate most blue-collar jobs, many
of which have strengrh-intensive components. Yet, men's greater size and strength
are much less influenlial overall because most occupations now favor brains over
brawn, and technology lessens the strength demands of mosr kinds of physical
work.
Despite these changes, occupations have remained profoundly sex-segregated.
'Women are overrepresented in occupations that especially reward social skills (e.g.,
nursing, teaching children) and underrepresented in things-oriented occuparions
(most STEM fields and mechanical and construction trades; Lippa et a1,, ZOI4).
The proportion of women is also low in occupations that especialiy reward agency
(e.g., top leadership roles; European Commission,2017). Sociologists rhus refer ro
horizontal gender segregation, by which women and men have occupations favoring
different traits and abilities, and uertical segregation by which men are concentrated
in occupations that yield greater starus and" power (Levanon & Grusky, 2016).
Social role theory proposes that everyday observations of rhe differing roles of
women and men provide information from which people derive gender stereotypes
(Eagly, 1987; Wood & Eagly, 201,2). The resulting beließ that women and men dif-
fer in agency and communion reflect essentialism, or the tendency to infer that dif-
ferent human essences underlie difßrences in behavior (Prentice & Miller, 2006).
People may assume that such essences follow from social or biological causes (Ran-
gel & Keller, 201I). These stereotypic beliefs have considerable accuracy ar group
level, that is, pertaining to women and men in general, due to their grounding in
observations of group members' behaviors in their typical social roles (Koenig &
EagIy, 2014).In this sense, stereotypes reflect social reality (Jussim, 2012). How-
ever, they are of course not accurate for individuals who arc atypical of their sex.
The perception of both sexes is influenced by their memberships in social groups
in addition to gender (intersectionality;Shie\ds, 2008). Hence, studying gender along
with groupings by sexual orientation, ethnicity, age, and social class reflects the
complexity of people's lives. lntersectional stereotypes can contain distinct elements
beyond gender stereotypes. For instance, gender stereotypes are closest to those of
'W'hites, whereas stereotypes about Black women are somewhat different from ste-
reotypes about women in general and Blacks in general (Ghavami & Peplau, 2013).
Gender stereotypes continue to receive support from contemporary occupa-
tional and domestic role segregarion (Levanon & Grusky, 2016). Thus, a com-
parison of gender-stereotypical beließ in the United States at earlier and recent
time points has revealed approximately the same agentic and communal beließ
(e.g., Haines, Deaux, & Lofaro,201.6). However, studies have failed to identify
women's gain in stereotypical competence, which presumably has occurred because
of their shift to paid employment and their grearly increased higher education. For
example, IJS survey research by the Pew Research Center (2015) found that respon-
dents beli.eved that women were higher than men on competence traits such as
organtzed, innovative, and intelligent, yet lower on agentic traits such as ambitious
and decisive. Also, research on so-called dynamic stereotype.s has shown a narrative
of.change whereby people believe that women have become and arc continuing
106 Sabine Sczesny et al
to become more agentic, whereas men are more constant in their attributes (Diek-
man & Eagly, 2000). In reality, women appear to have gained stereotypical com-
petence but much less agency given their slow rise into roles demanding qualities
such as dominance and competitiveness.
Consequences of gender stereotypes for occupants of
agentic and communal roles
Over the last decades, researchers have made substantial advances in under-
standing the consequences of gender stereotypes for women in agentically
demanding roles, especially in leadership roles. According to the lack oJfit model
(Heilman, 1983, 201,2) and the role congruity theory of prejudice toward female
leaders (Eagly & Karau, 2002),leadership roles are thought to require mainly
agentic qualities. Stereotypes of leaders and managers are thus more similar
to the characteri zation of men than women and portray leaders as higher in
agentic than communal traits (see meta-analysis by Koenig, EagIy, Mitche11, &
Ristikari, 201,1).'Women thus suffer from a mismatch between the leader role
and their female gender role.
Expectations triggered by this perceived mismatch can have far-reaching conse-
quences for women in leadership contexts. Their overriding challenge is to reconcile
the leader role's demand for a:gency and the female role's demand for communion,
creating a double bind. One consequence is that, as many experiments have demon-
strated, women are censored for violating the proscription against women engaging
in ciearly dominanr behavior (see meta-analysis by'Williams & Tiedens, 2016), even
though such behavior is generally appropriate to leader roles. In general, women
who occupy leadership positions are seen as less legitimate than their male coun-
terparts, triggering consequences such as challenges to their authority and reduced
cooperation (see review by Vial, Napier, & Brescoll,20t6).
As a result of these conflicting demands, female leaders can face a double
standard, such that for comparable levels of performance, they are evaluated
less favorably than male leaders, especially in male-dominated setcings (see
meta-analysis by Eagly, Makhgani, & Klonsky, 1992). For example, in studies
of managers (Heilman, Block, & Martell, 1995), men received higher evalua-
tions than women who performed equally wel1. Except in feminine settings,
women generally must display greater evidence of skill than men to be con-
sidered equally competent (Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1gg7). Also, as candidaces
for male-dominated jobs, women were less likely to receive positive evalua-
tions rhan equivalent men when evaluated by men (see meta-anaiysis by Koch,
D'Mello, & Sackett, 201'5).
The situation of men in female-dominated communal roles has received less
attention (Croft, Schmader, & 81ock,2015). One disadvantage that such men
experience is a lack of sane-sex role models, a deficit that women also experi-
ence in male-dominated roles. In addition, the incongruity and lack of fit the-
ories outlined above could be extended to consider the mismatch between the
lmplications for Cender l07
male stereotype and communal demands of female-typed occupations. Men are
often penalized when they enact communal behavior or are successful in femi-
nine domains and thereby violate male gender norms (Rudman, Moss-Racusin,
Phelan, & Nauts, 2012).
Men's occupancy of caring roles in the home and workplace can produce dou-
ble standards and double binds that mirror those that women experience in male-
dominated roles. For instance, men who were successful as employee relations
counselors (a female-dominated position) were perceived as less effective and were
granted less respect than successful women in the same job (Heilman & 'Wallen,
201,0). Also, an experiment found that male appiicants for an elementary teaching
position were perceived as more likely to be gay and less likeable (but not less hire-
able) than female applicants with similar qualifications (Moss-Racusin & Johnson,
2016).Infact, men working in childcare can be viewed as a safety threat because
some beiieve thal they might abuse children physically or sexually (Nentwich,
Poppen, Schälin, & Vogt, 2013).
Despite these and other studies suggesting male disadvantage in female-dominated
jobs, recent experimental evidence suggests that men may sometimes be favored
over women for such positions, although more by female than male evaluators (see
meta-analysis by Koch et a1., 2015). Perhaps such data reflect a concern, especially
on the part of women, for integraring jobs in the female ghetto.
Other evidence also suggests that, contrary to the doubie standard, persons
from the underrepresented sex are sometimes affirmatively hired over equally
qualified persons from lhe overrepresented sex. For instance, in a field experi-
ment, excellent fictitious female applicants for tenure-track assistant professorships
in STEM disciplines were preferred with a ratio of 2:L over equally qualified male
applicants by faculty members at numerous US universities ('W.illiams & Ceci,
2015). Moreover, data from actual hiring at 89 US lesearch-intensive insritutions
showed that in the sciences in general, women who applied for academic posi-
tions had a better chance of being interviewed and receiving offers than did male
job candidates (National Research Council, 2010). Furthermore, an organization's
commitment to diversity goals can favor those women who appear ro have the
abilities necessary for reaching the upper echelons of orgamzations. Such women
received higher pay rhan high-potential men (in field studies and experiments;
Leslie, Manchester, & Dahm ,2017).In addition, male vanguards in female-typed
professions can profit from structural advantages that tend to promote them into
leadership positions (the glass escalator; 'Williams, 201,3).
Intersectional stereotypes based on memberships in multiple groups can have
complex implications in difßring contexts, as revealed in experiments varying
such attributes. For instance, Black female leaders were evaluated more negatively
for organizational failure than'White women and Black and'White men (Rosette &
Livingston,2012). However, Black female leaders behaving dominandy did not
suffer from lhe same agency penalty that White female leaders experienced, prob-
ably because Black women's stereotype typically includes agentic attributes (Liv-
ingston, Rosette, & -W.ashington, 2012).
f08 Sabine Sczesny et al
Gender identity
Gender identity is individuals' self-definition as female or male, which is based
on their biological sex as interpreted within their culture (Wood & Eagly, 2015).
'When people describe who they are, most indicate that being ^man or woman or
boy or girl is important to their identity and ascribe at least some gender-stereo-
typical traits to themselves
The most basic aspect of gender identity is an existential sense of oneself as
female or male, which ordinarily corresponds to one's biological sex. Psycholo-
gists have invented various direct and indirect methods for assessing this basic or
existential categoization of oneself as male or female. The most popular measure
adapts Luhtanen and Crocker's (1992) collective self-esteem scale with items such
as "Being a woman [man] is an important reflection of who I am."
At an early age, children typically learn that there are two sexes and that they
belong to one of these groupings (Martin & Ruble, 2010). Awareness of self and
others as male or female, which emerges by around 18 months of age, further
develops as children learn what this ciassification means in their culture. Observa-
tions of other boys and girls motivate children to act similarly by, for example,
playing with gender-typical toys.
As children mature, their personal experiences and observations of others
shape their ideas about the sexes into gender stereotypes, which form one basis
for their identities as they incorporate the cultural meanings of gender into their
own psyches. To the extent that people value their female or male group member-
ship, they tend to self-stereotype by ascribing culturally feminine or masculine
attributes to themselves. The link between selGcategorization in a social group
and the application of the group stereotype to oneself is a key principle of social
identity theory (Abrams, Thomas, & Hogg, 1990). For example, among those
who value belonging to their male or female social category, women may regard
themselves as caring and compassionate and men regarded themselves as strong
and competitive.
To assess this self-stereotyping aspect of gender identity, psychologists typi-
cally obtain self-reports from women and men of their agentic and communal
personality traits by having them respond on rating scales (Bem, 1974; Spence &
Helmreich, 1980). These dimensions of personality thus match gender stereotypes,
and, in fact, were derived from earlier research demonstrating these stereotypes
(Rosenkrantz, Vogel, Bee, Broverman, & Broverman, i96B). Implicit measures
have also been adapted to assess this trait aspect of gender identity (e.g., Green-
wald & Farnham, 2000).
People act on their gender identities through self-regulatory processes, by
which they control their behavior to conform to their identity ('Wood, Chris-
tensen, Hebl, & Rothgerber, 1997). Persons who value their identity as a woman
or a man experience positive affect when acting consistently with their personal
gender standards and negative affect when acting in ways that depart from these
standards. These emotions then guide their future actions.
lmplications for Cender lO9
Peopie incorporate more complex forms of gender into intersectional identities
(Remedios &Snyder, 2015).ln addition, not everyone is strongly gender-identified,
and instead some people completely reject gender distinctions (genderqueer). Fur-
thermore, even though gender identity usually matches biological sex (cisgender),
variations exist, with some people transitioning to the other sex (transgender) and
somelimes modifying their biological sexual characteristics (transsexual). Other
people resist internalizing aspects of their gender's stereotype, as some women may
embrace high, not low, agency.
Gender identity related to behavior
Gender identity works together with stereotyping to influence behavior. To the
extent that women ascribe low agency to themselves or are aware of the stereo-
type that women lack agency, they can engage in self-limiting behavior such as
making less ambitious career choices (Heilman, 2012). Mere awareness of others'
stereotype-based expectations can produce stereotype threat that impairs their
performance (see review by Hoyt & Murphy, 2016). Many studies have shown that
individuals whose identities are threatened in a particular evaluative context can
suffer from impaired performance. Being especially identified with one's gender
increases vulnerability to such performance effects because the pertinent stereo-
type is personally relevant (e.g., Schmader,2002).
'Women can experience stereotype threat when attempting leadership. In an
experimental demonstralion, students viewed television commercials featuring
female-stereotypic (vs. neutral) content (Davies, Spencer, & Steele, 2005). 'Women,
but not men, exposed to the female-stereotypic portrayals subsequently expressed
less preference for a leadership role than a no-leadership role. Chronic threats of
this type can have profound impiications for women's identities in male-dominated
contexts (Pronin, Steele, & Ross, 2004).In such situations, women may engage
in identity bfurcation, by which they prioritize their identity in the domain being
evaluated (e.g., leadership, mathematics) and reject aspects of typical feminine iden-
tity that could threaten their domain competence (e.g., planning to have children).
This reaction seems to be a high price to pay for maintaining a sense of domain
competence. Also, female leaders' worry that others think that women have trouble
exerting authority can cause them to falter, lose confidence, and even to withdraw
(Hoyt & Murphy, 201.6).
Experimental research has related gender identities to various outcomes.
'Women perceived themselves as less suitable for an advertised leadership position
than men, but the candidates' agentic gender identity related more strongly to
their self-ascribed fit with the leadership position than their sex (Bosak & Sczesny,
2008). Furthermore, women working in collaboration with men were unwilling
to take an equal amount of credit for successful joint outcomes (Haynes & Heil-
man,2013), presumably because of their less self-assertive identities as well as oth-
ers' beließ that women should be modest.
1 1O Sabine Sczesny et al
Gender stereotypes and gender identities can complicate men's performances
as well. Stereotype threat can undermine men in communal roles, given, for
example, the stereotype that men are deficient in social skills. In an experiment
in which male participants learned that a test measured social sensitivity and that
women generally scored better on this test, these men performed worse than men
who had not been alerted to this female-favoring stereotype (Koenig & Eagly,
2005). 'Women, in contrast, were less affected by this information, performing
non-significantly better when exposed to the female superiority message. In
fact, men may be especially vulnerable to threat in such situations according to
the argument that male gender identity, or manhood, is a precarious social status
that is difficult to achieve and needs to be confirmed through visible actions
(Vandello & Bosson,2013). Therefore, as experinlents have shown, men may be
more anxious than women to guard and confirm their gender identity, moti-
vating agentic behaviors and restraining communal behaviors. The enhancement
of agentic behavior occurred when threats to men's masculinity increased their
aggression (Bosson, Vandello, Burnaford, -Weaver, & Arzu 'Wasti, 2009) and the
harassment of women (Maass, Cadinu, Guarnieri, & Grasselli, 2003). Specifically,
threats to men's masculinity increased their aggression and harassing behavior
toward women. Threatening men by informing them that they had low (vs. high)
testosterone caused them [o express more traditronal attitudes toward parenting
and less support for gender equality and collective egalitarian action (Kosakowska-
Berezecka et al., 201.6).
Other research has tested predictions about gender identity in natural sertings.
In general, agentic identity predicted sellassertive outcomes such as career suc-
cess (e.g., Abele, 2003; Evers & Sieverdtng,20l,4). Communal identity predicted
relational outcomes such as involvement in family roles (e.g., Abele, 2003) and
satisfaction in close relationships (e.g., Steiner-Pappalardo & Gurung, 2002). In
longitudinal research, such outcomes manifested even 10 years after the initial
assessment of gender identity (Abele & Spurk, 201,1).
Despire societal changes in recent years, apparently the communal and agen-
tic gender identities of women and men have converged only a small amount
between 1974 and 201.2, mainly by women viewing themselves as slightly more
agentic than in earlier years (see meta-analysis by Donnelly & Twenge, 2017).
An initial tendency for women's agency to increase sharply during this period
then faded, to produce only a smali increase overali. Given little overall change
in men's agency or men's or women's communion, sex differences in agentic
and communal gender identities have remained substantial: d:012 for greater
communion in women and d: 0.55 for greatet agency in men. This phenom-
enon should not be surprising, given the persistence of agentic and communal
stereotypes that we noted earlier and the striking segregation of occupational and
domestic roles that continues to fuel these stereotypes. Such findings suggest that
gender, understood in terms of agency and communion, has so far not yielded
much in response to changes in women's roles or to the ongoing challenges to
the gender binary.
t
-l
tt.
h
lmplications for Cender 111
Conclusion
The Big Two - agency and communion - are overriding themes in psychological
gender research. Social scientists, especially psychologists, have widely adopted
these concepts to describe gender stereotypes and gender identity and their con-
sequences for behavior. Refleccing psychologists' idea that masculine stereotypes
have. served largely as negative forces slowing women's attainment of gender
equality, it seemed that change in women's roles would boost their agency. Indeed,
women more often complete higher education, have taken up paid work and
entered many higher status occupational roles. 'What many scholars of gender have
missed is the preservation of the agency-communion divide in social roles, despite
these changes. Women remain concentrated primarily in communally demanding
occupations. In addition, women's entry into agentically demanding occupations
such as management and law has triggered internai resegregation. 'Women are
underrepresented in the subareas of these professions regarded as more agenti-
cally demanding (e.g., top leadership roles in corporations and government) and
overrepresented in the subareas regarded as more communally demanding (e.g.,
human resources management; Levanon & Grusky, 201,6).In addition, men have
shown little movement into female-dominated roles, either in the workplace or
in families (Croft et a1., 201,5). This neotraditional division of labor perpetuates
gender-stereotypical beliefs about agency and communion as well as matching sex
differences in gender identity.
Ilnderstanding of these phenomena could be furthered by information from a
broader range of cultures. Although some researchers have incorporated data from
many nations (e.g.,'Wiliiams & Best, 1982), the majority of studies come mainly from
'Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic cultures (Henrich, Heine, &
Norenzayan,2010), with the United States being decidedly overrepresenled.
As another limitation, theoretical and empirical work on agency and com-
munion has often been restricted to a binary view that neglects the intersections
of gender with other group memberships. Also neglected are increasing trends
toward gender and sexual fluidity. Future research should expand these themes to
enlarge the understanding of gender in its varied, contemporary manifestations.
Another emerging theme is that the Big Tiwo sometimes decompose into three
or four components. For example, agency sometimes has two components, asser-
tiyeness and competence, and communion also can have two componenls, warmth/
sociability and moralily (see Abele et a1.,201,6). The assertiveness/competence dif-
ferentiation is important to gender stereotypes because, as we have suggested,
contemporary stereotypes portray wonen as less assertive than men but not neces-
sarily less competent.
In conclusion, psychologists have made remarkable progress in understanding
the phenomena of gender. Nevertheless, in addition to remedying deficits we
noted in cuitural breadth, intersectionality, and subcomponents of agency and
communion, psychologists of gender should reach beyond discipiinary bound-
aries to take into account the important research conducted by sociologists and
112 Sabine Sczesny et al
economists as well as by neuroscientists and other biologically-oriented research-
ers. Current knowledge, enhanced by the new directions that we recommend,
should favor the development of policies and interventions that advance equal
opportunities for women and men.
References
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynarnics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits:
Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85,768-
7 7 6. http s : / / doi. orgl 1 0. 1 037 / 0 022 -3514.85. 4.7 68
Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of
the fundarnental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness: Com-
munion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.ory/10.3389/
fpsyg.2016.01810
Abele, A. E., &Spurk,D. (2011). The dualimpactofgender and the influence oftimingofpar-
enthood on men's and women's career development: Longitudinal findings. International
JournalofBehauioralDeuelopment,35,225-232. https://doi.org/10.II77/0165025411398181
Abele, A. E., &'Wojciszke, B. (2014). Cotnmunal and agentic content in social cognition:
A dual perspective model. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Aduances in experimental
social psychology (Yol. 50, pp. 195-255). Burlington: Academic Press.
Abrams, D., Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctiveness, social iden-
tity and gender salience. Britßh Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 87-92. https://doi.org/
10.1111 /
j.20 44 -8309.1990.tb 00889.x
Bem, S. L, (1974), The rneasurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and
C lin i c al P s y ch o I o gy, 4 2, 155 -162. hrp s : / / d,oi. ory
/ 10 .1037 / h0 03 6215
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz,D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of comperence:
Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of
Personality an d So cial Ps y chology, 7 2, 5 4 4-557.
Bosak,J.,&Sczesny,S. (2008).Amltherightcandidate?Self-ascribedfitofwomenandmenro
a leadership position. Sex Roles, 58, 682-688 . https://doi.orgl1O.1007 /sII199-007-9380-4
Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R., & Arzu 'Wasti, S. (2009).
Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression , Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 3 5, 623-634. hrps: / / doi.org/ 10.1.177 / 0746167208331161
Cohn, S. (2017). The determinants of the division of labor between men and women in
paid employment in the global North and South: How occupational sex-typing informs
the study of gender and development. Sociology of Deuelopment, 3, 1-23. https://doi,
or g/ 10.1525 / so d.2017 .3.1.1
Conway, M.,Ptzzamiglio, M. T., & Mount,L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency:
Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Jowrnal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 71,25.
Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and
psychological barriers to men's engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social
Psychologl, Reuiew, 19, 343470. https://doi.org/L0.1177 /1088868314564789
Cuddy, A. J.C., Wolf E. 8., Glick, P., Croty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as
cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personal-
ity 6n6 Social Psychology, lQ9, 622-635. htrps://doi. org/1,0.1037lpspi0000027
Davies,P G.,Spencer,S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air:Identiry safery moderares
the effects of stereofype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and
Social Prychology, 88,276-287. https://doi.org/I0.1037 /0022-3514.88.2.276
lmplications for Cender 113
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among
components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991.
Diekman, A. 8., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and
men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-
1 18 8. https : / / doi.or g/ 1,0.117 7 / 0146167 20 02620 01
Donnelly, K., & Twenge, J. M. (2017). Masculine and feminine traits on the Bem Sex-Role
Inventory, 19931012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 76,556-565. https://
doi.org/ 1.0.1007 / s11.199 -016 -0625 -y
EagIy, A. H. (1987). Sex dffirences in social behauior: A social-role interytretation Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
EagIy,A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female iead-
ers. Psychological Reuiew, 109, 573*598. https://doi.orgl10.1037 /0033-295X.I09.3.573
EagIy, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of lead-
ers: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 312. https://doi. org/1,0.1037 /h0090375
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers
from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence, Euroytean
Reuiew of Social Psychology, 5, 145. https://doi.orgl10.1080 /14792779543000002
European Commission. (2017). Smarter, greener, more inclusive? Indicators to support the Europe 2020
strategy (Statistical Books No. doi: 10.2785/760192). Lu,xembourg. Retrieved from Euro-
stat: http://ec.europa.eu /eurostat/en/web/prodrcts-statistical-books/-/KS-EZ-L7-001
Evers, A., & Sieverding, M. (201,4). Why do highiy qualified women (still) earn less? Gen-
der differences in long-term predictors of career success. Psychology ofWomen Qvtarterly,
3 8, 93 -10 6. http s : / / doi. or g / 10 .117 7 / 03 6168 4313 49 807 1
Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic ste-
reotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 37, 113-127. https://
doi. orgl 1 0. I 17 7 / 03 61,68431246 4203
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117,
21,48.
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure
self-esteem and self-concept. Journal oJ Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
https: I / doi.org/ I0.1,037 / 0022-3514.7 9.6.1,022
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing ... or are they
not? A comparison of gender stereotypes,19831014. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 40,
353163. htrps: / / doi.org/ 10.11V7 / 036168431663408L
Haynes, M. C., & Heilman, M. E. (2013).It had to be you (not me)!:-Women's artributional
ntionalization of their contribution to successful joint work outcomes. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 956-969. htrps:/ /doi.org/10,1177 /0146167213486358
Heilman, M. E. (1983), Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Orga-
nizatio nal Behauior, 5, 269-298.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizatüonal
B eh au i or, 3 2, 113-135. https ://doi.orgl10. 1 0 1 6 / j.riob.2012.II.003
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence
perceptions of managers? Journal oJ Social Behauior, 10,237152.
Heilman, M. E., & Wallen, A. S. (2010), Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for
men's gender-inconsistent success. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 664-667.
http s : / / doi. or g / 10 .101,6 /
j jesp.2010. 0 1. 0 0 8
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the wodd? The
Behauioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-135. https://doi. org/10.1017lS0140525X09991.52X
Hoyt, C. L., & Murphy, S. E. (2016). Managing to clear the air:Stereotype threat, women, and
leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27,387399.https://doi.org/l}.1016/j.1eaqta.2015.11.002
114 Sabine Sczesny et al.
Janssens, A. (1997). The rise and decline of the m.ale breadwinner family? An overview
of the debate. International Reuiew of Social History, 42, 1.13. https://doi.org/10.1'0l7/
s0020859000114774
Jussim, L. (201,2). Social yterception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-
JulfiUing prophecy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Koch, A. J., D'Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes
and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied
P s y chol ogy, L 0 0, 1.28 -1.61.. htrp s : / / doi. o r g/ 10. 1 0 37 / a0 03 67 3 4
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitiv-
ity. Sex Role
s, 5 2, 489 - 49 6. https : / / doi.ory/ 1'0.10 07 / sI1'199 -0 05 -37 1'4 -x
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (201.4). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype
content: Observations of groups' roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social
P s y chology, L 0 7, 37 1.492. hnp s: / / doi. orgl 10.1 037 / a0 037 215
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A.H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari,T. (201'1). Are leader stereo-
types masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psycfullogical Bulletin,
1 3 7, 61.6 - 6 42. hrtp s : / / doi. or g/ 1 0. 1 0 37 / a0 023557
Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Adamska, K., JaSkiewicz, M', Jurek, P., & Vandello,
J. A. (2016). If my masculinity is threatened I won't support gender equality? The role of
agentic self-stereotyping in restoration of manhood and perception of gender relations.
Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 17,274184. https://doi.org/1,0.1037lmen0000016
Leslie, L. M., Manchester, C, F., & Dahm, P. C. (2017). Why and when does the gender
gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Academy
of Management Journal, 60, 402-432. https://doi.org/1'0'5465/amj.20I5'0195
Levanon, A., & Grusky, D. B. (201,6). The persistence of extrerne gender segregation in the
twenty-first century. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 573-619.
Lippa, R. A., Preston, K., & Penner, J. Q01,4). 'Women's representationin 60 occupations
frorn 1972 to 201,0: More women in high-status jobs, few women in things-oriented
j obs. PLOS O ne, 9, e959 60. https : / / doiory / 10.137 1'lj ourn al'pone. 0 095960
Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman
get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female
leaders. Psycfu6llgirol Science,23,354=358.https://do|org/1,0.1177/095679761,1428079
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. Q992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's
social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18,302418.
Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselii, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under
social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 85, 853-870. https:/ /dot.org/I0.1,037 /0022-351'4.85.5.853
Marrin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of gender developmen,t. Annual Reuiew of
Psychologlt, 61,353481,. https://doi.org/1.0.1.146/annurev.psych.093008.100511
Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Johnson, E. R. (2016). tsacklash against male elementary educa-
tors. Journal of Applied Social Psj,chology, 379493. https://doi.orgl1O.1111'/ jasp.72366
National Research Council. (2010). Cender differences at critical transitions in the careers of sci'
ence, engineering, and mathematicsfaculty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nentwich, J. C., Poppen, 'W., Schälin, S., & Vogt, F. (2013). The same and the other: Male
childcare workers managing identity dissonance. International Reuiew oJ Sociology, 23,
3264, 45. https : //doi.orgl10. 108 0 / 039067 01,.2013'80 4295
Pew Research Center. (2015). Women and leadership: Public says wonxen are equally quali-
Jied, but barriers persist. Washington, DC. Retrieved frorn Pew Research Center: www
pewsocialtr ends.org/ 2015 / 01 / 14 /women-and-leadership
Prentice, D. A., & Cananza,E. QA04.'What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are
allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes.
lmplications for Cender t l5
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-2,81. https://doi.ory/10.71.1I/1471-6402.101,-1,-
00066
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and
rnen. Psychological Science, 17, I29-I35. hrtps:/ /doi.ory/10.1.1"1"1./ j.1467-9280.2006.01675.x
Pronin, E., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. (2004).Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype
threat: 'Women and mathematics. Journal of Experintental Social Psychlloty, 40,1"52-768.
https ://doi. org/ 10.1016
/ 50022-1031 (03) 00088-X
Rangel, lJ., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a
component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100,
1056. https : / / doi.org/ 10.1037 / a00224A1
Remedios, J. D., & Snyder, S. H. (2015). How women of color detect and respond to multiple
forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73,371483. https://doi.orgl1O.1007/s11.199-015-0453-5
Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role
stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal oJ Consulting and Clinical Psy-
ch o I ogy, i 2, 287 195. http s : //do i. or g / 10.1037 / h0 0259 09
Rosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. .W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects
of organtzational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identi-
ties. Journal of Experintental Social Psychology, 48, L1.62-1.167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jesp.2012.05.002
Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. QA}q. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias:
'Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social
Psy ch s1tt, 8 7, 49 4-509. https : / / doi.org / 1.0.1037 / 0022 -3514.87 .4.49 4
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J.E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity
and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against Gmale
leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1,65-179. https://doi.org/1}.1016/j.
jesp.201 1. 10.008
Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's
math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194101. https://doi.
org/ 10.1006/jesp.2001. 1 500
Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59,301111.
https : //doi. org / 10.10 07ls1 1 199- 008 -950 1 - 8
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expres-
siveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 5, 147-163. https://doi. org/10.1.1.1.1/ j.1471-6402.1980.tb00951.x
Steiner-Pappalardo, N. L., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2002). The femininity effect: Relationship
quality, sex, gender, attachment, and significant-other concepts. Personal Relationships,
9, 313 425. http s : / / doi. or g / 10.1111 / 147 5 - 681.1..0 0 022
Steinmetz, J., Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (201,4). Social role effects on gender ste-
reotyping in Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychsttt , 17, 52-60. https,//
doi.orgl 10. 1 III / ajsp.I20 4 4
Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. Q0I3). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis
of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men and Masculinity,'14,
101-113. https ://doi. ory/ 10.1"037 / a0029826
Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., & Brescoll, V. L. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the
self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 400-414. https://doi.
org/ 10.1.016 / j.Ieaqua.2015.I2.00 4
'Williams, C.L. (2013). The glass escalator, revisited:Gender inequality in neoliberal times.
Cender €t Society, 27, 609-629. https://doi.org/1.0.1.177/0891243213490232
Williams, J.E., & Best, D. L. 0982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
116 Sabine Sczesny et al
Williams, M. J,, & Tiedens, L. Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-
analysis of penalties for women's implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological
B ulletin, 1 42, 165-197 . hnp s : / / doi. orgl 1 0. L037/bul0 000 039
'Williams, 'W M., & Ceci, S. J. (20i5). National hiring experiments reveal 2: l . ;c;slty pref-
erence for women on STEM tenure treck. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
17 2, 5360-5365. https://doi, ory/ 70.1073/pnas.141887 8112
Wood,'W.., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M.R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-
typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,
523 -53 5 . http s : / / doi. or g / 10 .7037 / 0 022 -351,4.7 3 . 3 .523
Wood,'W., & Eagly, A.H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities
in behavior. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanne (Eds.), Aduances in experimental soclal psychol-
ogy (Vol. 46, pp.55-123). Burlington: Academic Press.
'Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). T*o traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles,
7 3, 46I- 47 3. https : / / doi.orgl 1 0. 1007 / sII199 -015 - 048 0 -2
... Communion represents the maintenance of relationships, social functioning, and other orientation, emphasizing warmth (i.e., caring, affectionate, and empathetic) and morality (i.e., reliable, trustworthy, and considerate; . The agentic and communal contents are essential when analysing gender stereotypes (Hentschel et al., 2019;Sczesny et al., 2019). Although gender stereotypes are dynamic and changing (Eagly et al., 2020;Haines et al., 2016), men are still perceived as more agentic than communalalthough some data have not supported this difference (Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021)-whereas women are considered more communal than agentic in most cultures (Ellemers, 2018;Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021;Sczesny et al., 2019;see Cuddy et al., 2015;Steinmetz et al., 2014). ...
... The agentic and communal contents are essential when analysing gender stereotypes (Hentschel et al., 2019;Sczesny et al., 2019). Although gender stereotypes are dynamic and changing (Eagly et al., 2020;Haines et al., 2016), men are still perceived as more agentic than communalalthough some data have not supported this difference (Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021)-whereas women are considered more communal than agentic in most cultures (Ellemers, 2018;Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021;Sczesny et al., 2019;see Cuddy et al., 2015;Steinmetz et al., 2014). In other words, agency prevails in the masculine stereotype, and communion in the feminine stereotype (Eagly et al., 2019). ...
... Although gender stereotypes are dynamic and changing (Eagly et al., 2020;Haines et al., 2016), men are still perceived as more agentic than communalalthough some data have not supported this difference (Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021)-whereas women are considered more communal than agentic in most cultures (Ellemers, 2018;Moya & Moya-Garófano, 2021;Sczesny et al., 2019;see Cuddy et al., 2015;Steinmetz et al., 2014). In other words, agency prevails in the masculine stereotype, and communion in the feminine stereotype (Eagly et al., 2019). Given that the socioeconomic context affects the expression of particular social groups' stereotypes, such as those linked to social class (Grigoryan et al., 2020), we proposed that this could also be the case for gender stereotypes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Economic inequality is a main issue in current societies and it affects people’s psychological processes. In this research, we propose that perceived economic inequality might affect how people perceive men and women. In two experiments carried out in Spain (N = 170) and Mexico (N = 215), we tested whether high (vs. low) economic inequality leads to changes in the perceived agency and communion of both men and women. Our findings suggest that when economic inequality is high (vs. low), the communal content in social perceptions of both men and women decreases. Specifically, under high (vs. low) inequality, the difference in agency and communion ascribed to a man becomes greater (i.e., men are perceived as even more agentic than communal), whereas this difference becomes smaller for women (i.e., women are still perceived as more communal than agentic, but this difference is smaller). We discuss these findings’ implications regarding the psychosocial effects of economic inequality.
... Most studies on gender stereotypes have been conducted in the United States (but see Gustafsson-Sendén et al., 2019 andKlysing et al., 2021 for recent studies in the Swedish context) and expanding research to more cultural contexts had been identified as an important avenue for research (Sczesny et al., 2019). In their review of the literature, Athenstaedt et al. (2008) point to similarities in common gender subgroups and their associated stereotype content in Western societies. ...
... Our results provide an overview of stereotypes of gender subgroups in a Norwegian context, answering calls for research beyond the US context (Sczesny et al., 2019). Despite the country's ranking as one of the world's most gender equal nations (World Economic Forum, 2020), our results to a large extent resonate with extant research on gender stereotypes (Ellemers, 2018), ambivalent sexism Fiske, 2001, 2011), and social role theory Koenig and Eagly, 2014). ...
... These limitations noted, we believe the present study has several contributions. We have provided a rich description of stereotypes of gender subgroups in Norway, adding to our knowledge about the Scandinavian context (Gustafsson-Sendén et al., 2019;Klysing et al., 2021) and answering calls for research in a broader range of cultural contexts (Sczesny et al., 2019). We have shown that stereotypes at the subgroup level are consistent with research indicating that current gender stereotypes converge on constructs related to the competence dimension and remain divergent for constructs related to warmth , contributing to the understanding of stereotype change. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we argue for the value of studying gender stereotypes at the subgroup level, combining insights from the stereotype content model, social role theory, and intersectional perspectives. Empirically, we investigate the stereotype content of gender subgroups in Norway, a cultural context for which a systematic description of stereotypes of gender subgroups is lacking. In a pilot study (n = 60), we established salient subgroups within the Norwegian context. Employing the stereotype content model, these groups were rated on warmth and competence in a main study (n = 191). Combining social role and intersectional perspectives, we compared stereotypes of women and men in the same social roles and social categories across subgroups. Comparisons between subgroups of women and men occupying the same social role indicated that at the subgroup level, women are often viewed as warmer than men, whereas the reverse appears to be a rare exception. Competence ratings, however, did not show this consistency. Our results at the subgroup level are consistent with research indicating that current gender stereotypes converge on constructs related to the competence dimension and remain divergent for constructs related to warmth.
... Sex and psychosocial context have been suggested as important correlates to perceptions of personal agency (Hurault et al., 2020;Schoon & Heckhausen, 2019). According to Sczesny et al. (2019), the gender stereotypes characteristic of Western societies tend to contribute to men understanding themselves as more agentic than women. In these societies, people expect men to be more active in directing their lives and women to be more compassionate. ...
... Such self-perception can be potentiated by society's expectation that men are more active, dynamic and persistent in the pursuit of their volitional goals. Further, our findings also can be due to gender inequalities experienced in the dailylive of women (Sczesny et al., 2019;Torres, 2018). Our findings corroborate previous empirical evidence (Hurault et al., 2020). ...
Article
Although there is a growing interest in the concept of sense of personal agency in adolescence and young adulthood, its operationalization and assessment have been inconsistent. We propose and test a preliminary assessment model of sense of agency combining four of the most relevant indicators suggested by the literature for its assessment (setting goals, optimism, decision-making, and self-efficacy). We conducted three independent studies with young adults [study 1 = 692; study 2 = 410] and adolescents [study 3 = 481] to analyze its psychometric properties. The CFA results revealed a good fit to the data in all three studies. The results of studies 1 and 2 indicate that even though the four dimensions share a significant proportion of variance, they do not assess the overlapping aspects of sense of agency. The findings of study 1 clarified that the proposed measurement model is invariant across sex and different levels of psychosocial risk. The results of study 2 suggest that, as expected, the latent construct of sense of agency is linked to different dimensions of psycho-emotional adjustment of young adults. Lastly, the findings of study 3 revealed that our preliminary model is invariant across three assessment points establishing the measurement longitudinal invariance.
... Most of the studies used post-experience questionnaires to assess users' perceptions of virtual agents. Likert scale items were used to determine participants' stereotyped attributions of the agents, corresponding to communal traits stereotypically associated with women (e.g., affectionate, compassionate, sensitive, inviting, helpful), agency traits stereotypically associated with men (e.g., arrogant, ambitious, aggressive, courageous, and decisive), and competence traits associated more often with men (e.g., knowledgeable, intelligent, expert, credible, creative, innovative and organized) (Lee, 2003;Nunamaker et al., 2011;Feng et al., 2017;Khashe et al., 2017; van der Lubbe and Bosse, 2017; Kantharaju et al., 2018;Sczesny et al., 2018). Another questionnaire was sometimes used to determine which stereotypical gendered traits users applied to the agents (Kulms et al., 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Virtual learning environments often use virtual characters to facilitate and improve the learning process. These characters, known as pedagogical agents, can take on different roles, such as tutors or companions. Research has highlighted the importance of various characteristics of virtual agents, including their voice or non-verbal behaviors. Little attention has been paid to the gender-specific design of pedagogical agents, although gender has an important influence on the educational process. In this article, we perform an extensive review of the literature regarding the impact of the gender of pedagogical agents on academic outcomes. Based on a detailed review of 59 articles, we analyze the influence of pedagogical agents' gender on students' academic self-evaluations and achievements to answer the following questions: (1) Do students perceive virtual agents differently depending on their own gender and the gender of the agent? (2) Does the gender of pedagogical agents influence students' academic performance and self-evaluations? (3) Are there tasks or academic situations to which a male virtual agent is better suited than a female virtual agent, and vice versa, according to empirical evidence? (4) How do a virtual agent's pedagogical roles impact these results? (5) How do a virtual agent's appearance and interactive capacities impact these results? (6) Are androgynous virtual agents a potential solution to combatting gender stereotypes? This review provides important insight to researchers on how to approach gender when designing pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments.
... This postulate would be consistent with considering teaching work environment more stressful for male than for female teachers. These outcomes may be still due to the gender roles preestablished in society which attribute that women are raised to be oriented towards others and to connect themselves with others (Diekman and Eagly, 2000;Sczesny, Nater and Eagly, 2019;Wolfram, Mohr and Borchert, 2009). In contrast, higher loneliness scores in men might be attributed to their lower communion and even social repercussions related to communal traits and behaviors in men (Moss-Racusin, Phelan and Rudman, 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
Motivation, teaching satisfaction, loneliness and affects are significant variables concerning the quality of teaching performance. Nevertheless, the presence of the homebased teaching during COVID- 19 could have influenced these variables. As such, the goals of this research were to examine whether there are sex differences in teacher’s motivation, teaching satisfaction, loneliness and affects; and if there is any association of age on teacher motivation, teaching satisfaction, loneliness and affects. A sample of 315 teachers (Mage=41.95; SD=10.18) participated in the study and fulfilled a series of self-report questionnaires during COVID-19 homebased teaching. Results revealed significant sex differences in identified regulation, loneliness, and balance of negative affects. In particular, female teachers reported significantly higher scores in identified regulation and balance of negative affects and men reported higher scores in loneliness. In conclusion, it should be considered to create interventions to help teachers to reduce the negative consequences of loneliness and negative affects on teaching performance and to enhance motivational profiles, especially among men teachers.
... Sex stereotypes might offer a possible explanation to this finding. According to these stereotypes, boys must be active agents of their own life course, while girls must be socially sensitive and compassionate (Sczesny et al., 2019). Although there has been a promotion of sex equality at the legislative level in Portugal, such as in other Western countries, this equality is not yet visible in many spheres of individuals' lives (Torres, 2018). ...
Article
Guided by attachment theory, we explored in the current study the links between parental emotion-coaching, attachment to parents and adolescent's sense of agency. Further, we examined a possible mediating role of adolescent’s attachment to parents in the association between parental emotion-coaching and sense of agency. All models control for cumulative psychosocial risk, and adolescents’ sex and age, and take into account the reports of both mothers and fathers. The sample included 501 Portuguese families comprising adolescents, their mothers, and their fathers. Adolescents (ages ranged from 15 to 18) reported on their attachment to parents, personal agency, and cumulative psychosocial risk, whereas mothers and fathers independently completed a questionnaire assessing their meta-emotion skills. The results indicate that both mothers’ and fathers’ emotional coaching are positively associated with the quality of adolescent’s attachment to parents. Nonetheless, parental emotion-coaching are not directly associate with sense of agency. The quality of emotional bond with father is linked to a more positive sense of agency, while relationships characterized by mother’s inhibition of adolescent’s exploration are associated with less positive perceptions of agency. Parental emotion coaching seems to be associated with the sense of personal agency through the quality of attachment to parents. These results are discussed according to attachment theory taking into account the parents’ importance to adolescents' development. Our findings provide a first attempt to unravel the possible links between parental emotion-coaching, attachment to parents and sense of agency; nevertheless, they need to expand.
Article
Kazakhstan is characterized by women’s significant representation in the financial industry, including the audit sector, which distinguishes the country from other states and can lay the basis for a competitive advantage of the economy. The literature review on audit firms in Kazakhstan showcases a scarcity of studies about gender’s influence on audit firms’ financial performance. The paper aims to identify the correlation between business owners’ gender and the net income of Kazakhstani private audit firms. The publicly available data on audit companies and the size of their paid taxes were processed and analyzed with the quantitative research method. The data of 117 audit firms for 2021 were scrutinized through the parametric Student t-test for independent samples with the utilization of the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). To analyze and adjust the normal distribution of the studied data, frequency histograms, taking logarithms, and formalized tests by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk criteria were applied. The findings demonstrate the significant correlation between women owners and the size of paid taxes by their audit firms: women positively contribute to audit firms and generate higher net earnings compared with their men counterparts. The paper postulates the necessity of women’s more intensive involvement in higher levels of decision-making to increase the performance indicators of the financial industry in Kazakhstan. The study supports the idea that less gender bias in the expert field can be a good indicator of women's real contribution to Kazakhstan's economy. The auditing field should serve as a solid role model for lowering the barriers to female leadership in other industries.
Article
Full-text available
This article analyzes the depiction of famous women and men in textbooks of Italian as a foreign language. The textbooks are employed in the specific educational context that involves teaching of Italian to undergraduate students at the University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina. We interpret textbooks from a constructivist point of view as cultural artefacts that contain not only knowledge and facts related to the specific subject that they are created for, but also dominant ideologies (Curdt-Christiansen 2017). In order to examine the relevance attributed to women in the sociocultural panorama we use quantitative content analysis to calculate and determine the overall number of male and female representatives in different professional spheres and the diversity of professions they occupy. Afterwards, we employ Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine the ideological implications beneath the portrayal of famous women and men and the power relations that shape it. The results demonstrate that the exclusion of Vučenović ________________________________________________________________________________________ 174 women is a commonplace in all textbooks-even those published in a more recent period don't manifest progressive tendencies regarding gender equality. The sociocultural narrative shaped through textbooks reflects power-structured relations typical for the traditional patriarchal conception of society in which gender inequalities are naturalized and masked as a non-ideological common-sense (Fairclough 1989). Hence, textbooks are recognized as instruments that reinforce patriarchal ideologies and legitimize unequal relations of power.
Article
Power-seeking women incur social penalties known as backlash, yet research has identified two motive bases for leadership: power and status. Across five studies (N = 1683) using samples of working professionals, MBA students, undergraduates, and online participants, we investigate perceptions of individuals with varying motives for power and status. We uncover the motive for status is more congruent with feminine stereotypes compared to the power motive (Study 1), and that women who desire status are less likely to incur backlash compared to women who desire power (Study 2). We find that women who desire power appear to have greater perceived leadership potential compared to women who desire only status. However, women who desire both power and status benefit, as they are perceived as highly leaderlike but incur less backlash than women who only desire power (Study 3). We detect support for the novel “Status Compensation Effect” in experimental (Studies 1–3) and naturalistic settings (Studies 4–5), such that the negative social consequences typically incurred by power-seeking women (i.e., backlash) are reduced for women who simultaneously desire status. The current research highlights how women's desires for power and status serve competing functions in impacting their likelihood of incurring backlash.
Article
Full-text available
There is a growing need to identify personal and interpersonal resilience factors that might enhance relationship satisfaction and lead to happier and more enjoyable shared lives. The current study used a dyadic approach that took into account the characteristics of both partners and examined the role of perceived partner support in the relation between personal hope and both partners’ relationship satisfaction. One-hundred-and-thirteen couples filled out questionnaires regarding hope, perceived partner support, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated an actor but not partner effect of hope on perceived support. Interestingly, different patterns of association emerged for men and women as only women’s hope and perceived support were jointly related to women’s own satisfaction and to their partners’ satisfaction. Men’s hope and perceived support were interrelated but were not associated with relationship satisfaction. The role of hope in the context of interpersonal relationships as well as the role of gender differences in dyadic processes are further discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Agency (A) and communion (C) are fundamental content dimensions. We propose a facet-model that differentiates A into assertiveness (AA) and competence (AC) and C into warmth (CW) and morality (CM). We tested the model in a cross-cultural study by comparing data from Asia, Australia, Europe, and the USA (overall N = 1.808). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported our model. Both the two-factor model and the four-factor model showed good fit indices across countries. Participants answered additional measures intended to demonstrate the fruitfulness of distinguishing the facets. The findings support the model's construct validity by positioning the fundamental dimensions and their facets within a network of self-construal, values, impression management, and the Big Five personality factors: In all countries, A was related to independent self-construal and to agentic values, C was related to interdependent self-construal and to communal values. Regarding the facets, AA was always related to A values, but the association of AC with A values fell below our effect size criterion in four of the five countries. A (both AA and AC) was related to agentic impression management. However, C (both CW and CM) was neither related to communal nor to agentic impression management. Regarding the Big Five personality factors, A was related to emotional stability, to extraversion, and to conscientiousness. C was related to agreeableness and to extraversion. AA was more strongly related to emotional stability and extraversion than AC. CW was more strongly related to extraversion and agreeableness than CM. We could also show that self-esteem was more related to AA than AC; and that it was related to CM, but not to CW. Our research shows that (a) the fundamental dimensions of A and C are stable across cultures; and (b) that the here proposed distinction of facets of A and C is fruitful in analyzing self-perception. The here proposed measure, the AC-IN, may be a useful tool in this research area. Applications of the facet model in social perception research are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI) is one of Sandra Bem’s most notable contributions to feminist psychology, measuring an individual’s identification with traditionally masculine and feminine qualities. In a cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. college students’ scores on the BSRI (34 samples, N = 8,027), we examined changes in ratings on the Bem masculinity (M) and femininity (F) scales since the early 1990s. Additional analyses used data collected in a previous meta-analysis (Twenge 1997) to document changes since the BSRI’s inception in 1974. Our results reveal that women’s femininity scores have decreased significantly (d = −.26) between 1993 and 2012, whereas their masculinity remained stable. No significant changes were observed for men. Expanded analyses of data from 1974 to 2012 (94 samples, N = 24,801) found that women’s M rose significantly (d = .23), with no changes in women’s F, men’s M, and men’s F. Women’s androgyny scores showed a significant increase since 1974, but not since 1993. Men’s androgyny remained the same in both time periods. Our findings suggest that since the 1990s, U.S. college women have become less likely to endorse feminine traits as self-representative, potentially revealing a devaluation of traditional femininity. However, it is also possible that the scale items do not match modern gender stereotypes. Future research may need to update the BSRI to reflect current conceptions of gender.
Article
Full-text available
During the past 30 years, women’s participation in the workforce, in athletics, and in professional education has increased, while men’s activities have been more stable. Have gender stereotypes changed over this time period to reflect the new realities? And, to what extent does gender stereotyping exist today? We address these questions by comparing data collected in the early 1980s to new data collected in 2014. In each study, participants rated the likelihood that a typical man or woman has a set of gendered characteristics (traits, role behaviors, occupations, and physical characteristics). Results indicate that people perceive strong differences between men and women on stereotype components today, as they did in the past. Comparisons between the two time periods show stability of gender stereotypes across all components except female gender roles, which showed a significant increase in gender stereotyping. These results attest to the durability of basic stereotypes about how men and women are perceived to differ, despite changes in the participation and acceptance of women and men in nontraditional domains. Because gender stereotypes are apparently so deeply embedded in our society, those in a position to evaluate women and men, as well as women and men themselves, need to be constantly vigilant to the possible influence of stereotypes on their judgments, choices, and actions.
Article
A role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders proposes that perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles leads to 2 forms of prejudice: (a) perceiving women less favorably than men as potential occupants of leadership roles and (b) evaluating behavior that fulfills the prescriptions of a leader role less favorably when it is enacted by a woman. One consequence is that attitudes are less positive toward female than male leaders and potential leaders. Other consequences are that it is more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles. Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that these consequences occur, especially in situations that heighten perceptions of incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles.
Article
This essay attempts to contribute to the study of gender and development by developing a systematic theory of the division of work between men and women in the global North and the global South. There is an extensive literature on women's work and development; this literature consists of rich case studies that do not attempt to identify general principles that apply to women's work as a whole. In formal employment settings, women are most likely to be excluded from settings where employers are buffered from labor costs and do not have to utilize cheap labor. In the global North, this means settings that are capital-intensive, where raw material and machinery costs reduce the importance of wage costs in total budgets. In the global South, petroleum lowers the importance of wage costs, promoting male employment, while export orientation increases the importance of cheap labor, promoting female employment. Family firms and female self-employment have their own dynamics, which are discussed.
Article
Why is there so much occupational sex segregation in the 21st century? The authors cast light on this question by using the O*NET archive of occupation traits to operationalize the concepts of essentialism and vertical inequality more exhaustively than in past research. When the new model is applied to recent U.S. Census data, the results show that much vertical segregation remains even after the physical, analytic, and interactional forms of essentialism are controlled; that essentialism nonetheless accounts for much more of total segregation than does vertical inequality; that the physical and interactional forms of segregation are especially strong; that the physical form of essentialism is one of the few examples of female-advantaging segregation; and that essentialism takes on a fractal structure that generates much finely detailed segregation at detailed occupational levels. The authors conclude by discussing how essentialist processes partly account for the intransigence of occupational sex segregation.
Article
Abundant research has documented a gender pay gap; women earn less than men, all else being equal. Against the backdrop of an overall female penalty, we propose that the widespread adoption of diversity goals in organizations creates a female premium for certain women. We integrate the economic principle of supply and demand with theory from the field of strategic human resource management and theorize that individuals perceive high-potential women - who have the abilities needed to reach the upper echelons of organizations, where women remain underrepresented - as more valuable for achieving organizational diversity goals than high-potential men and, in turn, reward them with higher pay. Two field studies (Studies 1 and 3) and two laboratory experiments (Studies 2 and 4) reveal a female premium that is unique to high-potential women (Studies 1 and 2), driven by perceptions that high-potential women have more diversity value than high-potential men (Studies 2 and 4), and larger in contexts where diversity goals are stronger (Studies 3 and 4). Our theory and findings challenge the assumption that the gender pay gap uniformly disadvantages women and offer new insight into why and when the female penalty reverses and becomes a female premium.
Article
We investigated the existence, nature, and processes underscoring backlash (social and economic penalties) against men who violate gender stereotypes by working in education, and whether backlash is exacerbated by internal (vs. external) behavioral attributions. Participants (N = 303) rated one of six applications for an elementary teaching position, identical apart from target gender and behavioral attribution type. Male applicants were rated as more likely to be gay, posing a greater safety threat, and less likeable (but not less hireable) than identical female applicants. Perceived sexuality and threat mediated target gender differences in likeability. Unexpectedly, behavioral attributions did not interact with target gender, suggesting that providing internal attributions may not exacerbate men's backlash. Implications for backlash theory and education gender disparities are discussed.
Article
In an attempt to explain why the gender gap in leadership positions persists, we propose a model centered on legitimacy. When women hold powerful positions, they have a harder time than men eliciting respect and admiration (i.e., status) from subordinates. As a result, female power-holders are seen as less legitimate than male power-holders. Unless they are able to legitimize their role, relative illegitimacy will prompt a variety of consequences such as more negative subordinate behavior and reduced cooperation when the leader is a woman. Subordinate rejection will likely put female leaders in a precarious mindset, and trigger negative responses toward subordinates; such behavior can confirm negative expectations of female leaders and further undermine female authority in a self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. Leader or organizational features that enhance status attributions and/or lower subordinates' perceptions of power differentials may increase legitimacy for women in leadership roles.