A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Happiness Studies
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Happiness Studies (2019) 20:2173–2188
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0042-8
1 3
RESEARCH PAPER
(E)Quality ofLife: ACross‑National Analysis oftheEect
ofGender Equality onLife Satisfaction
AndreP.Audette1 · SeanLam2· HaleyO’Connor2· BenjaminRadcli2
Published online: 11 October 2018
© Springer Nature B.V. 2018
Abstract
Several international organizations have recently prioritized promoting equal rights for
men and women. Reflecting these priorities, many view gender equality as a means to pro-
mote societal well-being; yet still others suggest that it has deleterious effects on the enact-
ing state. To test these pro-equality arguments, we examine the effect of four major indica-
tors of gender (in)equality on life satisfaction: the Gender Empowerment Measure, Gender
Development Index, Gender Inequality Index, and the Gender Gap Index (or Global Gen-
der Gap). Utilizing survey data from the World Values Survey and Eurobarometer, we
find strong and consistent evidence that promoting gender equality leads to greater sub-
jective well-being. Furthermore, we demonstrate that policies promoting gender equality
tend to improve the quality of life for everyone, not just direct beneficiaries of the policies
(women). Indeed, men also see strong and significant gains in life satisfaction when the
sexes are more equal. As a result, we suggest that scholars of subjective well-being expand
research into determinants of quality of life to include equality and other social factors. We
also suggest that the findings presented here have tangible implications for governments
and policy workers who are tasked with promoting equality and well-being.
Keywords Gender· Equality· Subjective well-being· Happiness
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1090
2-018-0042-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Andre P. Audette
aaudette@monmouthcollege.edu
Sean Lam
sean.p.lam.32@nd.edu
Haley O’Connor
hoconnor@nd.edu
Benjamin Radcliff
radcliff.1@nd.edu
1 Department ofPolitical Science, Monmouth College, 700 E. Broadway, Monmouth, IL61462,
USA
2 Department ofPolitical Science, University ofNotre Dame, 2060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls,
NotreDame, IN46556, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.