ArticlePDF Available

Black girls speak STEM: Counterstories of informal and formal learning experiences

Authors:

Abstract

This study presents the interpretations and perceptions of Black girls who participated in I AM STEM—a community- based informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) program. Using narrative inquiry, participants generated detailed accounts of their informal and formal STEM learning experiences. Critical race meth- odology informed this research to portray the dynamic and complex experiences of girls of color, whose stories have historically been silenced and misrepresented. The data sources for this qualitative study included individual inter- views, student reflection journals, samples of student work, and researcher memos, which were triangulated to produce six robust counterstories. Excerpts of the counterstories are presented in this article. The major findings of this research revealed that I AM STEM ignited an interest in STEM learn- ing through field trips and direct engagement in scientific phenomena that allowed the girls to become agentic in con- tinuing their engagement in STEM activities throughout the year. This call to awaken the voices of Black girls to speak casts light on their experiences and challenges as STEM learners—from their perspectives. The findings confirm that when credence and counterspaces are given to Black girls, they are poised to reveal their luster toward STEM learning. This study provided a space for Black girls to reflect on their STEM learning experiences, formulate new understandings, and make connections between the informal and formal learning environments within the context of their everyday lives, thus offering a more holistic approach to STEM learn- ing that occurs across settings and over a lifetime.
Wiley – Link to access to view full article: https://rdcu.be/80xd
King, N. S. & Pringle, R. M. (2018). Black girls speak STEM: Counterstories of informal
and formal learning experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-31.
!
!
... Informal STEM learning experiences, although disproportionately accessible, are also important opportunities to support Black and Latinx youth in developing and sustaining interest in STEM in ways that restructure the disciplines themselves (King and Pringle 2019). Youth's lives outside of school are influential on their science and STEM learning pathways (Bricker and Bell 2012). ...
... We thought with collected stories of STEM learning to identify pockets of resistance to problematic structures of schooling. Particularly, we took up notions of care to identify seeds of developing relationships as counterstories in the development of counterspaces (King and Pringle 2019). Following what is being cared for and how care is a political act of teaching and learning with youth of Color (Madkins and McKinney de Royston 2019), we identified spaces where learning was a bidirectional process of relationship building, where teacherlearners and learner-teachers were becoming, together. ...
... Analyzing data and developing counterstories is a critical research method of sharing the stories of those who have been marginalized to uncover and challenge forces of oppression and speak to change (King and Pringle 2019). Sketching these counterstories shares the experiences of youth of Color on Turing Robotics and at Turing High to expose the anti-dialogic structures and seed possibilities for making STEM education more just. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we—a participatory action group—use the tenants of critical pedagogy to articulate how youths developed relationships for and with STEM disciplinary practices through participation in spaces outside of the official scripts of their high school STEM classrooms in the United States. Spaces included their robotics team, a hybrid digital collaborative space, and in an extra project with a teacher. Each of these cases surfaces youth’s ongoing orientation to the fact that STEM learning is relational, and political, exemplifying pockets of resistance against the structures of schooling that foreground learning as an act of individuals. These pockets of resistance take a certain sociopolitical solidarity between learners and educators that centers STEM education which has the possibility to remake power structures to center relations with worlds, human and non-human, and the futures they help learners imagine.
... Some efforts have focused on creating interventions for Black women at various critical focal points of their careers through informal education. For example, some programs have focused on exposure to STEM fields for Black female students (King and Pringle, 2019), while some have focused on out-of-school interventions grounded in cultural practices that help Black girls thrive in STEM (Ashcraft et al., 2017;Scott, 2021). Other programs have focused on mentoring relationships between Black scientists and engineers with Black female students (Allen-Handy et al., 2020). ...
... Other programs have focused on mentoring relationships between Black scientists and engineers with Black female students (Allen-Handy et al., 2020). Finally, some programs that aim to increase the representation of Black females in STEM have focused on creating social supports that help Black women navigate their STEM careers (Allen-Handy et al., 2020; King and Pringle, 2019;Lane and Id-Deen, 2020;Levine et al., 2015). These efforts successfully support women and girl participants in expressing an interest in STEM and provide safe spaces where Black girls and women can flourish in STEM. ...
... We also have additional questions, such as "Why does AMP! draw more Black women teachers?" There is a great need to make more visible the science talents and proficiency of Black women and girls (King and Pringle, 2019). Does the program somehow provide Black female teachers with a context in which their STEM educational talents are recognized, elevated, and validated by the staff that delivers AMP!? ...
... Four were long-term or longitudinal studies (Calabrese Barton & Tan, 2018;Mark, 2018;Mensah, 2019;Pringle et al., 2012). Three others were conducted in science methods courses (Mensah & Jackson, 2018;Rivera Maulucci, 2013;Sparks, 2018); one was conducted in an advanced placement secondary biology class (Ryu, 2015); one, in a communitybased informal STEM program (King & Pringle, 2019); and one, in and outside science classrooms (Teo, 2015). The one quantitative study in this category used a national cohort of eighth-grade students to consider how diferent gender and racial/ethnic subgroups compared to white males in their aspirations for careers in science or mathematics (Riegle-Crumb et al., 2011). ...
... 798). King and Pringle (2019) also utilized intersectionality, and specifcally critical race feminism, in their work with K-12 Black girls to expose racial and gender essentialism as the girls navigated between formal and informal STEM learning spaces. Critical race feminism, like intersectionality, focuses on the lives of people who face multiple forms of discrimination based on race, gender, and class, for example, and reveals how these factors interact with a system of white male patriarchy and racist oppression (Wing, 1997). ...
... Critical race feminism, like intersectionality, focuses on the lives of people who face multiple forms of discrimination based on race, gender, and class, for example, and reveals how these factors interact with a system of white male patriarchy and racist oppression (Wing, 1997). Like Calabrese Barton and Tan's (2018) study of youth community science learning, King and Pringle (2019) used counterspaces, or "sites where defcit notions of people of color can be challenged and where a positive climate can be established and maintained" (Solórzano et al., 2000, p. 70). The researchers provided shelter from the "daily torrent of microaggressions" (Howard-Hamilton, 2003, p. 23) that people of color experience. ...
... As Feminist Science and Technology Studies (Feminist STS) scholars have long argued, however, those marginalized by STEM possess a privileged vantage point from which to critique STEM fields [33]- [34]. Today, researchers are increasingly foregrounding marginalized students' perspectives (e.g., [4], [35]- [36]), but these perspectives have received limited attention in Canadian educational contexts. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper explores undergraduate mentors’ perspectives on, and participation in, “Bringing STEM to Life: Work Integrated Learning in Physics” (BSTL), a work-integrated, equity-oriented STEM outreach program administered by the kindergarten to industry (k2i) academy at York University’s Lassonde School of Engineering. To that end, this study brings Feminist Science and Technology Studies and critical pedagogy to bear on a three-phase methodological approach to generating and analyzing qualitative data pertaining to the mentorship component of BSTL. Preliminary findings suggest that (1) undergraduate mentors bring complex STEM motivations, shaped by intersecting marginalized identities, to bear on their mentorship duties; (2) mentors possess nuanced yet occasionally contradictory understandings of STEM, equity, and society; and (3) mentors’ experiences in the BSTL program are variable but positive. These findings suggest that outreach programs can expand their capacity to generate equitable outcomes by actively supporting the creation of STEM counterspaces, foregrounding equity training, and exposing mentors to critical theoretical perspectives on STEM, equity, and society.
Article
In this article, we use the framework knowledgeable agents of the digital to understand the agentic experiences of one adolescent Black girl’s digital and STEAM literacy practices. After discriminatory acts deterred Star’s interest in exploring STEAM literacy practices in school, her involvement in a digital application workshop for Black girls and their fathers and a robotics club for Black girls reshaped her understanding of herself as a leader and innovator. Through qualitative data sources, including surveys, interviews, observations, photos, audio/video recordings, focus groups, vision boards, and digital app making, we explore her actions as a knowledge maker, creator, and producer. These roles (re)affirmed her interests in STEAM and her racialized and gendered identities as a Black girl. This study is important for rethinking collective educational efforts to disrupt systems that discourage and marginalize Black girls and women of varying identities in digital and STEAM literacies.
Article
This article offers a qualitative analysis of infrastructural in/justice in a community‐partnered design intervention focused on developing high‐tech low‐cost Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM) projects. We examined the kinds of infrastructural injustices that were present in three afterschool programs and how it shaped STEAM education designs and opportunities for learning with technology to take hold. Combining insights and methods from studies of science and technology with Critical Race Theory, we developed the concept of infrastructural in/justice to illuminate the challenges of organizing STEAM for justice. Infrastructural injustices were identified at the level of dominant narratives that shaped the ideas, resources, and values that undergirded programming and pedagogical practices. We found that community educators were central to creating more just STEAM infrastructures. They drew out unjust infrastructural narratives, created counternarratives that allowed young people of color space to expand their technology and STEAM practices, and connected these practices to their everyday lives, identities, and emerging interests. We detail how working‐class community educators of color are dreaming and enacting new ways to engage with STEAM and STEAM education alongside young people. As we have shown, their ideas and practices combined with the young people's visions for the future challenged neoliberal and racialized narratives of STEAM. Despite community educators' of color critical expertise, their jobs remained precarious within informal STEAM infrastructures. To design for and sustain more just community‐driven STEAM activities we argue that the field must attend not only to how the work of infrastructuring to how community‐driven STEAM is done but also by whom. These activities, organized by community educators of color, must be valued and protected through the classification systems within informal STEAM infrastructures in order to design and sustain more just community‐driven STEAM initiatives.
Article
The COVID-19 global pandemic significantly impacted both the academic and social and emotional development of middle school students. This article describes the benefits of implementing an interdisciplinary, project-based summer school program to support middle school students as they adapted to in-person learning after school closures due to the global pandemic. Findings show that participation in the summer program contributed to students’ engagement and interest in science and engineering activities and their social-emotional growth through peer collaboration and relational mentor support.
Article
In this special issue, we focus on the resilience processes found among diverse groups of CWOC. We emphasize four key concepts: developmental perspective (emerging adulthood), resilience, resistance, and intersectionality. Included are the studies with African American and Latinx young adult women, Latina mothers, and Chinese sojourner women. Papers in the special issue appear as follows: Rana et al.’s paper on Latinx mothers attending college, then Causey et al. on African American women navigating white college spaces with typologies of success, followed by Johnson et al.’s paper, amplifying African American and Latinx women’s intersectional strivings using maternal messages as rudders, and finally, Qin et al.’s paper on international Chinese women managing their immigrant experiences as sojourners in the U.S. In each study CWOC demonstrate successful resistance and striving as the press the boundaries of gender-race constraints.
Article
This study investigates how recently resettled refugee youth took up STEM‐rich making experiences at an after‐school community club in relation to negotiating their resettlement process. Using critical participatory ethnography grounded in sustained engagement with and in community, authors 1 and 2 worked with refugee youth through sustained STEM‐rich making programming where youth innovated and created products that they needed but did not have access to, at their residential community center. We draw on atmospheric walls (alienating messaging built into spaces) and rightful presence toward justice in teaching and learning, as complimentary conceptual frameworks to guide this study. Findings illustrate how youth engaged in allied political struggles to identify atmospheric walls at work in the community and how they seeded moments of rightful presence through leveraging both human and material resources in their STEM‐rich making club. We discuss incubating epistemologies as a making present practice, especially in how particular power structures in refugee communities were made visible and specific stakeholders and their actions, identifiable. How youth engaged in allied political struggles through community‐driven STEM, nested within the social dynamics of their resettlement process, is unpacked. This study provides insights into the possibilities for community‐driven science. When STEM‐rich maker education is driven by communities' needs and grounded in their epistemologies, it can attend to both epistemic rigor while also addressing injustice. We discuss the implications that a stance on community‐driven science raises for the role of science education, especially when we concern ourselves with the whole lives of refugee youth.
Article
In this forum we explore different perspectives for how to apply intersectionality as a critical framework for design across multiple contexts. --- Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas, Editors
Article
Full-text available
This article asserts that despite the salience of race in U.S. society, as a topic of scholarly inquiry, it remains untheorized. The article argues for a critical race theoretical perspective in education analogous to that of critical race theory in legal scholarship by developing three propositions: (1) race continues to be significant in the United States; (2) U.S. society is based on property rights rather than human rights; and (3) the intersection of race and property creates an analytical tool for understanding inequity. The article concludes with a look at the limitations of the current multicultural paradigm.
Article
Full-text available
Background Within mathematics education research, policy, and practice, race remains undertheorized in relation to mathematics learning and participation. Although race is characterized in the sociological and critical theory literatures as socially and politically constructed with structural expressions, most studies of differential outcomes in mathematics education begin and end their analyses of race with static racial categories and group labels used for the sole purpose of disaggregating data. This inadequate framing is, itself, reflective of a racialization process that continues to legitimize the social devaluing and stigmatization of many students of color. I draw from my own research with African American adults and adolescents, as well as recent research on the mathematical experiences of African American students conducted by other scholars. I also draw from the sociological and critical theory literatures to examine the ways that race and racism are conceptualized in the larger social context and in ways that are informative for mathematics education researchers, policy makers, and practitioners. Purpose To review and critically analyze how the construct of race has been conceptualized in mathematics education research, policy, and practice. Research Design Narrative synthesis. Conclusion Future research and policy efforts in mathematics education should examine racialized inequalities by considering the socially constructed nature of race.
Article
Full-text available
Middle school is a critical time for students to develop a strong understanding of and appreciation for science, yet science education in the middle grades in the United States is in crisis. This research focuses on the practices of 18 predominately alternatively certified teachers in an intensive professional development program in a southeastern state as they accessed their students' prior ideas. The program engaged participants in specially designed, job-embedded graduate coursework in science education and science content, and other complementary experiences to support their enactment of a reform-based middle school science curriculum. The design of the program and the curriculum emphasized the importance of eliciting student preconceptions for meaningful science learning. Specifically, we asked, "How do middle school science teachers in an intensive professional development program surface students' prior knowledge?" The analysis of 61 classroom observations revealed that the teachers have begun to incorporate strategies to highlight the students' prior ideas in their instruction. In addition, they utilized a number of strategies, many of which were suggested in the reform-oriented curriculum the teachers were enacting. Despite ongoing professional development support, there was a great deal of variability in teachers' enactments of this practice with some important features of the practice not well observed in the classroom observations, such as probing and documenting student prior ideas.
Article
In this chapter, we argue that intersectionality is a theoretical and methodological framework by which education researchers can critically examine why and how students in STEM fields who are members of intersecting marginalized groups have distinctive experiences related to their social identities, other psychological processes, and educational outcomes. Taken separately, the bodies of education research focused on the experiences of Black students and female students in STEM fields often render Black women and girls “hidden figures” in that they have not sufficiently addressed their simultaneous racialized and gendered experiences in educational contexts. Additionally, we find that the current discourse on intersectionality is limited in that it does not attend to key psychological processes associated with identity and the intersectional experience in STEM education. We take a theoretical and methodological approach to examining intersectionality in STEM education and provide a new interpretation of the literature on Black women and girls in this social context. A synthesis of (N = 60) research studies revealed that (1) identity; (2) STEM interest, confidence, and persistence; (3) achievement, ability perceptions, and attributions; and (4) socializers and support systems are key themes within the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Our analysis also highlights the ways that researchers have employed intersectionality to make the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education more visible, or “unhidden.” We discuss these findings from a psychological perspective and provide insights to guide future research and practice directions in STEM education.
Book
Ambitious and encouraging, this text for prospective and practicing elementary and middle school science teachers, grounded in contemporary science education reform, is a valuable resource that supplies concrete approaches to support the science and science-integrated engineering learning of each and every student. At its core, it is based in the view that science is its own culture, consisting of unique thought processes, specialized communication traditions, and distinctive methods and tools. Using culture as a starting point and connecting it to effective instructional approaches, the authors describe how a teacher can make science accessible to students who are typically pushed to the fringe-especially students of color and English language learners. Written in a conversational style, the authors capture the tone they use when they teach their own students. The readers are recognized as professional partners in the shared efforts to increase access, reduce inequities, and give all students the opportunities to participate in science.
Article
Prior research regarding minorities in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields indicated that the factors of peer support and participation in STEM-related activities contributed positively to minority students' recruitment and retention in these fields. Utilizing stereotype threat as a conceptual framework, this qualitative case study investigated the contribution of these factors by examining the experiences of minority students majoring in a STEM field. Data analyzed through a deductive approach indicated that a stereotype threat adversely affecting retention and recruitment in STEM could be either minimized or maximized by peer support, in the form of educator or familial influence, and participation in STEM-related activities through internships and the application of STEM-related knowledge. Findings from this research may inform higher education institutional practices involving the recruitment and retention of students to the STEM fields from minority populations.