A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Motivation and Emotion
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Motivation and Emotion (2019) 43:325–338
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9732-0
ORIGINAL PAPER
When neutral isnotneutral: Neurophysiological evidence forreduced
discrimination betweenaversive andnon-aversive information
ingeneralized anxiety disorder
SamanthaDenefrio1,2· SarahMyruski1· DouglasMennin3· TracyA.Dennis‑Tiwary1,2
Published online: 8 October 2018
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by a range of cognitive and affective disruptions, such as pathological
worry. There is debate, however, about whether such disruptions are specifically linked to heightened responses to aversive
stimuli, or due to overgeneralized threat monitoring leading to deficits in the ability to discriminate between aversive and
non-aversive affective information. The present study capitalized on the temporal and functional specificity of scalp-recorded
event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine this question by exploring two targeted neurocognitive responses in a group of
adults diagnosed with GAD: (1) visual processing of angry (aversive) versus neutral (non-aversive) faces; and (2) response
monitoring of incorrect (aversive) versus correct (non-aversive) responses. Electroencephalography was recorded while 15
adults with GAD and 15 age-matched controls viewed angry and neutral faces prior to individual trials of a flanker task. ERPs
to faces were the P1, reflecting attention allocation, the early posterior negativity(EPN), reflecting early affective discrimi-
nation, and the N170, reflecting face-sensitive visual discrimination. The error-related negativity(ERN) and positivity (Pe)
were generated to incorrect and correct responses. Results showed reduced discrimination between aversive and non-aversive
faces and responses in the GAD relative to the control group during visual discrimination (N170) and later-emerging error
monitoring (Pe). These effects were driven by exaggerated processing of non-aversive faces and responses, suggesting over-
generalized threat monitoring. Implications for cognitive-affective models of GAD are discussed.
Keywords Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)· Event-related potentials (ERPs)· Emotion· Anxiety
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is among the most com-
monly-diagnosed anxiety disorders (Ballenger etal. 2001)
affecting an estimated 5.7% of the adult population in their
lifetime and over 18million individuals in the U.S. alone
(Kessler etal. 2005). Recent theoretical models of GAD
(Mennin etal. 2002, 2005; Salters-Pedneault etal. 2006)
posit that overgeneralized threat monitoring, measured in
terms of reduced ability to differentiate between aversive and
non-aversive affective information, may be a key mechanism
in the emergence and maintenance of GAD symptoms.
Reduced affective discrimination may be one of several,
temporally-distinct stages of disrupted threat processing in
GAD. For example, research on GAD using reaction time
measures documents early-emerging exaggerated atten-
tion to threat-themed relative to neutral stimuli (Amir etal.
2009), whereas research using neuroimaging techniques
such as fMRI documents reduced discrimination between
aversive and neutral images (e.g., enhanced bilateral dorsal
amygdala activation to cues predicting both aversive and
neutral images; Nitschke etal. 2009). These two findings,
one of early exaggerated response to aversive stimuli and
the other of reduced discrimination during more elabora-
tive processing, may reflect methdological differences in the
level of analysis (brain or behavior) and in the time-scale of
measurement. The use of a single measurement technique
that can simultaneously capture multiple stages of response
to affective stimuli is therefore a crucial next step in clarify-
ing the nature of affective discrimination in GAD.
* Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary
tracy.dennis@hunter.cuny.edu
1 Hunter College, The City University ofNew York,
NewYork, NY, USA
2 The Graduate Center, The City University ofNew York,
NewYork, NY, USA
3 Teachers College, Columbia University, NewYork, NY, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.