Annotated list of taxonomic novelties published in “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova” issued by G. L. Rabenhorst between 1855 and 1858

Abstract

Braun, U. 2018: Annotated list of taxonomic novelties published in "Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova" issued by G. L. Rabenhorst between 1855 and 1858. Schlechtendalia 35: 1-43. New taxa and new combinations published by G. L. Rabenhorst in "Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova" in the middle of the 19 th century are listed and annotated. References, citations and the synonymy are corrected when necessary. The nomenclature of some taxa is discussed in more detail. Uredo fragariae is neotypified and reduced to synonymy with Phragmidium fragariastri. The nomenclature of the names Uredo obtusa and Phragmidium obtusum is discussed and clarified. Synonymie werden korrigiert falls notwendig. Die Nomenklatur einiger Taxa wird detaillierter besprochen. Uredo fragariae wird neotypisiert und als Synonym zu Phragmidium fragariastri gestellt. Die Nomenklatur der Namen Uredo obtusa und Phragmidium obtusum wird diskutiert und geklärt.

Full text

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
1
Annotated list of taxonomic novelties published in “Klotzschii
Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova” issued by G. L.
Rabenhorst between 1855 and 1858
Uwe BRAUN
Abstract: Braun, U. 2018: Annotated list of taxonomic novelties published in “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum
Mycologicum, Editio Nova” issued by G. L. Rabenhorst between 1855 and 1858. Schlechtendalia 35: 1–43.
New taxa and new combinations published by G. L. Rabenhorst in “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum,
Editio Nova” in the middle of the 19th century are listed and annotated. References, citations and the synonymy are
corrected when necessary. The nomenclature of some taxa is discussed in more detail. Uredo fragariae is neotypified
and reduced to synonymy with Phragmidium fragariastri. The nomenclature of the names Uredo obtusa and
Phragmidium obtusum is discussed and clarified.
Zusammenfassung: Braun, U. 2018: Kommentierte Liste taxonomischer Neuheiten publiziert in “Klotzschii
Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova“, herausgegeben von G. L. Rabenhorst zwischen 1855 und 1858.
Schlechtendalia 35: 1–43.
Neue Taxa und Kombinationen publiziert von G. L. Rabenhorst in “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum,
Editio Nova” in der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts werden aufgelistet und annotiert. Referenzangaben, Zitate und die
Synonymie werden korrigiert falls notwendig. Die Nomenklatur einiger Taxa wird detaillierter besprochen. Uredo
fragariae wird neotypisiert und als Synonym zu Phragmidium fragariastri gestellt. Die Nomenklatur der Namen
Uredo obtusa und Phragmidium obtusum wird diskutiert und geklärt.
Key words: Fungi, nomenclature, exsiccata.
Published online 4 Oct. 2018
Introduction
In 1832, Johann F. Klotzsch initiated the exsiccata “Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum” and
issued Cent. 1 and 2. Gottlob L. Rabenhorst continued this exsiccata since 1842 and issued
Cent. 3 to 20. An index was published by Rabenhorst (1851). Taxonomic novelties published in
this exsiccata have been listed and annotated in Braun (2018). Rabenhorst continued this
exsiccata under the name “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova” and issued
eight centuria between 1855 and 1858 [Series Prima]. Details to this exsiccata, including data of
the publication of the particular centuria and announcements in the journals Botanische Zeitung,
and Flora are to be found in Kohlmeyer (1962). According to ICN, Art. 30.2 (Ex. 12),
descriptions, new combinations and other taxonomic novelties on labels accompanying
distributed specimens (exsiccata) are effectively published, i.e., valid names published on
printed labels of distributed exsiccata have to be taken into consideration with regard to priority
issues of taxa. However, experiences have shown as far that names published in exsiccata have
often been neglected or wrongly cited in nomenclature data bases and taxonomic treatments.
The particular centuria of “Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum” were prepared and, when ready to
be distributed, announcements in several botanical journals were published, i.e., descriptions on
printed labels in the exsiccata have priority and names (with repeated descriptions) in the
journals are later isonyms (Art. 6.3, Note 2) that have to be disregarded. In some cases,
particular centuria were issued even one calendar year earlier [e.g., Cent. 2 in 1855, but
announcements in Botanische Zeitung 14 and Flora 39 in 1856]. Numerous names appearing in
exsiccata are nomina nuda (without any descriptions or diagnoses) which were validated in later
publications by the original author or other authors, either as “ex cases” or as “combinations”
under other genus names. In the latter case, the validated names must be attributed to the
validating authors alone. The present work was performed in consultation with Index Fungorum
and MycoBank, i.e., the results are also meant to be groundwork for these databases.
A complete set of “Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova” preserved in HAL
was the base for the present nomenclatural study and reassessment of names. Some types have

2
been re-examined in order to clarify the identity of the taxa concerned. In other cases, currently
used and recognized names are cited and highlighted in bold.
Annotated list of taxa
Cent. 1
Peziza mortuaria Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 18,
1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Tapesia mortuaria (Ces.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 8: 378, 1889.
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 18 (fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Claviceps pusilla (Ces.) Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no.
38, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Hypocrea pusilla Ces., Linnaea 21: 27, 1848, nom. nud.
 Hypocrea pusilla Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 16: no. 1533, 1851.
Notes: This is a valid combination, based on Hypocrea pusilla, published on the label of
Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 38 (fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Sphaeria isiaca Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 40, 1855
[Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Ophiobolus isiacus (Ces.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: 353, 1883.
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 40 (fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Depazea maianthemi Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 51, 1855
[Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855], nom. nud.
= Asteromella sp.
Notes: Rabenhorst (l.c.) cited “Sphaeria (Depazea) maianthemi Rabenh. [as “majanthemi”],
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 8: no. 752, 1845”, which is also a nom. nud. The material
deposited at HAL has been examined and turned out to be a spermatial morph of an unknown
species of a genus belonging to the Mycosphaerellaceae. The pycnidia (spermogonia) are small,
30–80 µm diam, and form minute bacilliform spermatia, straight to slightly curved, about 3–4 ×
1 µm. This species is not identical with Phyllosticta maianthemi W.B. Cooke (Cooke & Shaw
1952: 795), which is also an Asteromella (van der Aa & Vanev 2002: 303), described from

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
3
North America on Maianthemum dilatatum. The conidia of the later species are very similar,
but the spermogonia are much larger, 70–125 µm diam.
Valsa suffulta (Nees : Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 56,
1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Sphaeria suffulta Nees, Syst. Pilze (Würzburg): 316, [“1816–17”] 1816.
 Leptosphaeria suffulta (Nees : Fr.) Niessl, in Winter, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig)
1.2: 461, 1885.
Notes: This is a valid combination, based on Sphaeria suffulta, published on the label of
Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 56 (fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Ophiobolus acuminatus (Sowerby : Fr.) Duby, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 1: no. 57, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Sphaeria acuminata Sowerby, Col. fig. Engl. Fung. Mushr. (London) 3: 176, tab. 394:3, 1803.
Notes: This is a valid combination, based on Sphaeria acuminata, published on the label of
Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 57 (fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Sacidium foedans Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 61,
1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Leptothyrium foedans (Ces.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 3: 634, 1884.
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 61 (fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Helicosporium pallidum Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no.
62, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 598, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 62 (fig. 7).
Fig. 7
Pestalotia hypericina Ces. [as “Pestalozzia”], in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 1: no. 64, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 493, 1855].
 Seimatosporium hypericinum (Ces.) B. Sutton, Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 64: 483, 1975.

4
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 64 (fig. 8).
Fig. 8
Pestalotia phacidioides Ces. [as “Pestalozzia”], in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 1: no. 65, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 494, 1855], nom. nud.
Dothidea potentillae Fr. f. potentillae-vernae Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 68, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 494, 1855].
= Sphaeria potentillae Schwein., Schriften Naturf. Ges. Leipzig 1: 46, 1822, nom. illeg. (Art.
53.1).
 Dothidea potentillae Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 563, 1823.
 Venturia potentillae (Fr.) Cooke, Grevillea 6(38): 76, 1877.
Notes: This is a valid forma with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum
Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 68 (fig. 9).
Fig. 9
Acrostalagmus murinus Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no.
74, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 494, 1855].
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 74 (fig. 10).
Fig. 10
Torula funerea Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 1: no. 79, 1855
[Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 494, 1855].
 Periconia funerea (Ces.) E.W. Mason & M.B. Ellis, Mycol. Pap. 56: 117, 1953.
Notes: This is a valid species name with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium
Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 79 (fig. 11).
Fig. 11

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
5
Puccinia stellariae f. saginae Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent.
1: no. 86a, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 13: 599, 1855; Flora 38: 494, 1855].
= Puccinia arenariae (Schumach.) J. Schröt., Hedwigia 19: 38, 1880.
Notes: This is a valid taxon (forma) published as “substrate form” on the label of Klotzschii
Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 86a (fig. 12).
Fig. 12
Cent. 2
Peziza cesatii Mont., Hedwigia 1(10): 72, 1855 [and Mont., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no. 128, 1855; Bot. Zeitung 14: 86, 1856; Flora 39: 12, 1856].
 Helotium cesatii (Mont.) Mont., Syll. gen. sp. crypt. (Paris): 187, 1856.
 Pocillum cesatii (Mont.) De Not., Comm. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1(fasc. 5): 361 [“1863“] 1864.
Notes: This species was at first validly published as Peziza cesatii in “Hedwigia 1(10): 72,
1855” with a secondary description on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum,
Editio Nova, 128 (fig. 13). Hence, Montagne’s (l.c.) publication under Helotium should be
classified as combination.
Fig. 13
Depazea linnaeae (Ehrenb. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, Leipzig 1844.
1
[Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no. 149, 1855; Bot. Zeitung 14: 86, 1856;
Flora 39: 13, 1856].
 Sphaeria linnaeae Ehrenb., Sylv. mycol. berol. (Berlin): 29, 1818 [: Fr., Syst. mycol. 2(2):
531, 1823].
 Septoria linnaeae (Ehrenb. : Fr.) Sacc., Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 5(4): 121, [“1889”] 1890.
Notes: The combination Depazea linnaeae was first validly published by Rabenhorst (1844).
Depazea vaccinii (Sowerby : Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no.
150, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 86, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856].
 Sphaeria vaccinii Sowerby, Col. fig. Engl. Fung. Mushr. (London) 3: 156, tab. 373:1, 1803 [:
Fr., Systema Mycologicum 2(2): 418, 1823].
 Gibbera vaccinii (Sowerby : Fr.) Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sectio Post. (Stockholm): 412,
1849.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum
Mycologicum, Editio Nova, 150 (fig. 14).
1
Rabenhorst (1844) reallocated a large number of species to the genus Depazea. Numerous of the
combinations concerned have been omitted, i.e., they are not yet listed in important databases of fungal
names (see list at the end, p. 38).

6
Fig. 14
Depazea hedericola (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, Leipzig 1844 [Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 11: no. 1074, 1846; Bot. Zeitung 4: 879, 1846; Flora 31: 506, 1848;
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no. 151, 1855; Bot. Zeitung 14: 86, 1856;
Flora 39: 13, 1856].
 Sphaeria hedericola Fr. [as “hederaecola“], Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 528, 1823.
 Septoria hedericola (Fr.) Jørst., Skr. Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo 22: 11, 1965.
Notes: The combination Depazea hedericola was first validly published by Rabenhorst (1844).
Depazea fragariicola (Wallr.) Rabenh. (“fragariaecola“), Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138,
Leipzig 1844 [Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no. 152, 1855; Bot. Zeitung 14:
86, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856].
 Sphaeria fragariicola Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 767, 1833.
Notes: The combination Depazea hedericola was first validly published by Rabenhorst (1844).
Rhytisma acerinum f. spermatigerum Rabenh. (“spermatigera”), Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no. 160b, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 86, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856].
Notes: This is a forma validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 160b (fig.
15).
Fig. 15
Peronospora ochroleuca Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 2: no.
175, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 87, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856].
Notes: This species was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 175 (fig.
16). Constantinescu (1991: 66) classified this name as “invalid” since portions of no. 175 were
distributed under the name P. ochracea Ces. P. ocholeuca was the sole name used in the
publications in Bot. Zeitung 14: 87, 1856 and Flora 39: 13, 1856. Furthermore, alternative
names published before 1 Jan. 1953 are not invalid (Art. 36.3).
Fig. 16
Fusarium graminum var. tritici J.G. Kühn, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 2: no. 188, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 87, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856].
Notes: This variety was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 188 with a
brief description (fig. 17). The duplicate deposited in herbarium HAL is supplemented by a
handwritten label probably added by J. Kühn (fig. 18).
Fig. 17

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
7
Fig. 18
Sorosporium schizocaulon var. violae Casp. in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 2: no. 190, 1855 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 87, 1856; Flora 39: 13, 1856], nom. nud.
 Urocystis violae (Sowerby) A.A. Fisch. Waldh., Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 40: 258, 1867.
Cent. 3
Corticium platani Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 215,
1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 426, 1856; Flora 39: 374, 1856].
 Terana platani (Ces.) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 2: 872, 1891.
Notes: This species was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 215 (fig.
19).
Fig. 19
Corticium puberum var. effusum Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 3: no. 216b, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 426, 1856; Flora 39: 374, 1856], nom. nud.
Sphaeria oncostoma Duby, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no.
253, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 427, 1856; Flora 39: 375, 1856].
 Diaporthe oncostoma (Duby) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Ver. Naturk. 23-24: 205, [1869-
70] 1870.
Notes: This species was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 253 (fig.
20).
Fig. 20

8
Phacidium astrantiae Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no.
258, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 429, 1856; Flora 39: 376, 1856].
 Leptotrochila astrantiae (Ces.) Schüepp, Phytopath. Z. 36: 260, 1959.
Notes: This species was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 258 (fig.
21).
Fig. 21
Podospora Ces., Hedwigia 1(15): 103, Tab. XIV, A, 1–11, 1856 [Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 259, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 429, 1856; Flora 39: 376,
1856].
Notes: This genus was validly published in “Hedwigia 1(15): 103, Tab. XIV, A, 1–11, 1856”
with a description later added in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 259 (fig. 22).
Fig. 22

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
9
Podospora fimicola (Corda) Ces., Hedwigia 1(15): 103, Tab. XIV, A, 1–11, 1856 [Rabenh.,
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 259, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 429, 1856;
Flora 39: 376, 1856].
 Schizothecium fimicola Corda [as “fimicolum”], Icon. fung. (Prague) 2: 29, 1838.
Notes: The combination P. fimicola was first validly published in “Hedwigia 1(15): 103, Tab.
XIV, A, 1–11, 1856”.
Depazea palustris Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 266,
1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 445, 1856; Flora 39: 376, 1856].
Notes: This species has been validly published with a description in Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 266 (fig. 23).
Fig. 23
Hirudinaria Ces., Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 1–3, 1856 [in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 269, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 445, 1856; Flora 39: 377,
1856].
Notes: This genus was validly published in “Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 1–3, 1856. A
description was later added in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 269.
Hirudinaria macrocarpa Ces., Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 1–2, 1856 [in Rabenh.,
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 269, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 445, 1856;
Flora 39: 377, 1856, as H. macrospora].
Notes: This species was first validly published in Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 1–2, 1856.
Later a description was added in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 269. The name H.
macrospora used in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 269, 1856,
Bot. Zeitung 14: 445, 1856, and Flora 39: 377, 1856 seems to be an alternative name for H.
macrocarpa.
Hirudinaria mespili Ces., Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 3, 1856 [in Rabenh., Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 269, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 445, 1856; Flora 39: 377,
1856].
Notes: This species was validly published in Hedwigia 1(15): 104, Tab. XIV, G, 3, 1856. Later
a description was added in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 269.
Oidium monilioides f. leonuri Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no.
272, 1856; Bot. Zeitung 14: 446, 1856; Flora 39: 377, 1856
= Neoerysiphe galeopsidis (DC.) U. Braun, Schlechtendalia 3: 50, 1999.
Notes: This is a valid taxon published as substrate forma (fig. 24)
Fig. 24
Zygodesmus tristis Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 274,
1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 446, 1856; Flora 39: 377, 1856].
Notes: This species was validly published with a description in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 274 (fig. 25).

10
Fig. 25
Phragmidium fragariae (Rabenh.) Rossmann, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 3: no. 281, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 446, 1856; Flora 39: 378, 1856].
 Uredo fragariae Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 12, Leipzig 1844 [neotype
(designated here, MycoBank, MBT383656), Germany, near Giessen, forest, Linder Mark, on
Potentilla sterilis (as “Fragaria vesca”), July, J. Rossmann [Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no. 281] (HAL, s.n.).
 Epitea fragariae (Rabenh.) G.H. Otth, Mitt. Naturf. Ges. Bern 531-552: 87, [“1863”] 1864.
Notes: Rossmann (l.c.) cited and discussed Uredo fragariae Rabenh., which is the basionym of
Phragmidium fragariae (Rabenh.) Rossmann (fig. 26). Rabenhorst (l.c.) described Uredo
fragariae on “Fragaria vesca” (host identity unclear and doubtful). The leaves distributed in
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, no. 281 belong to Potentilla sterilis. Hence, it can be
assumed that Uredo fragariae is very probably a synonym of a species currently referred to as
Phragmidium fragariae (DC.) G. Winter (since type material of Rabenhorst’s Uredo fragaria is
not preserved, I propose to neotypify this species with the material distributed in Rabenh.,
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, no. 281 in order to determine the application of this
name and Rossmann’s combination). The combination Phragmidium fragariae (Rabenh.)
Rossmann is valid, hence Phragmidium fragariae (DC.) G. Winter is an illegitimate name
(homonym). Therefore, the correct name for this species is now Phragmidium fragariastri [to
maintain the name Phragmidium fragariae (DC.) G. Winter a proposal to reject the name
Phragmidium fragariae (Rabenh.) Rossmann would be necessary]:
Phragmidium fragariastri (DC.) J. Schröt., in Cohn, Krypt.-Fl. Schlesien (Breslau) 3.1(17–24):
351, 1887.
 Puccinia fragariastri DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 55, 1815.
= Puccinia fragariae DC., Encycl. Méth. Bot. 8: 244, 1808.
 Phragmidium fragariae (DC.) G. Winter, in Rabenh., Krypt.-Fl., Zweite Aufl., Band 1, Lief.
4: 228, 1881, nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Rossmann 1856.
= Uredo fragariae Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 12, Leipzig 1844.
 Phragmidium fragariae (Rabenh.) Rossmann, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 3: no. 281, 1856.
 Epitea fragariae (Rabenh.) G.H. Otth, Mitt. Naturf. Ges. Bern 531-552: 87, [“1863”] 1864.
= Lecythea potentillarum Lév., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 3, 8: 374, 1847.
= Phragmidium granulatum Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Ver. Naturk. 23-24: 46, 1870.
The name Phragmidium obtusum, sometimes reduced to synonymy with Phragmidium
fragariae, was occasionally ascribed to G. Winter (Winter 1880), although it is a combination
based on Uredo obtusa F. Strauss, which was introduced by Winter (1880: 26) as
“Phragmidium obtusum (Str.)”. However, the name Phragmidium obtusum was already cited by
Link (in Willdenow 1825: 84) and Tulasne (1854: 147 and 148). Link (l.c.) referred to Kunze &
Schmidt, Deutschl. Schwämme no. 120, and Tulasne (l.c.) as well as Winter (l.c.) cited no 312
of this exsiccata.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
11
Fig. 26
The first introduction of Phragmidium obtusum, based on Uredo obtusa, is attributable to Kunze
& Schmidt, Deutschl. Schwämme 120 issued in 1816 (fig. 27). However, Strauss (1810: 107)
cited Puccinia potentillae Pers. (non Uredo potentillae Schumach. 1803) as basionym for Uredo
obtusa, i.e., the latter name is a nom. nov. for Puccinia potentillae in Uredo and a synonym of
Phragmidium potentillae (Pers.) P. Karst. Schmidt & Kunze (l.c.) used the new name Uredo
obtusa, proposed by Strauss (l.c.), but they failed to introduce the correct combination
Phragmidium potentilla, based on the older valid name Puccinia potentillae, although they cited
the latter name as synonym:
Phragmidium potentillae (Pers.) P. Karst., Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 31: 49, 1878.
 Puccinia potentillae Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 1: 229, 1801, non Uredo potentillae
Schumach., 1803.
 Uredo obtusa F. Strauss, Ann. Wetter. Ges. Gesammte Naturk. 2: 107, [“1810”] 1811, non
Uredo potentillae Schumach. 1803.
 Phragmidium obtusum (F. Strauss) J.C. Schmidt & Kunze, Deutschl. Schwämme, Fünfte
Lieferung: 5, 1816, nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1).
Fig. 27 (Schmidt & Kunze, Deutschl. Schwämme, Fünfte Lieferung: 5, 1816)
Aregma obtusatum is another species previously reduced to synonymy with Phragmidium
fragariae. Fries (1832) introduced the name Aregma obtusatum and cited Puccinia potentillae,
P. fragariastri, and Uredo obtusa as synonyms, hence, Aregma obtusatum being a superfluous
name since the included name Puccinia potentillae ought to have been adoped. Later, Fries
(1849) reduced Aregma to synonymy with Phragmidium and introduded Phragmidium
obtusatum, referring to his illegitimate Aregma obtusatum:
Aregma obtusatum Fr. [as “obtusata”], Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 3(2): 497, 1832, nom. illeg. (Art.
52.1).
 Phragmidium obtusatum (Fr.) Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sectio Post. (Stockholm): 507, 1849.

12
Capitularia myelospora Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 3: no.
283, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 446, 1856; Flora 39: 378, 1856].
= Uromyces behenis (DC.) Unger, Einfl. Boden. Verth. Gew.: 216, 1836.
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 283 (fig. 28).
Fig. 28
Roestelia cancellata f. spermatigera Bail, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 3: no. 285, 1856 [Bot. Zeitung 14: 447, 1856; Flora 39: 378, 1856].
Notes: This is a valid forma published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 285 (fig. 29).
Fig. 29
Cent. 4
Cenangium umbellatarum Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4:
no. 312, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 93, 1857; Flora 40: 133, 1857].
 Pyrenopeziza umbellatarum (Ces.) Rehm, Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges. 13: 175, 1912.
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 312 (fig. 30).
Fig. 30
Peronospora grisea Unger var. minor Casp., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 4: no. 323, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 94, 1857; Flora 40: 133, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid variety published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 323 (fig.
31). This variety was assigned to Peronospora grisea. This species name has to be ascribed to
Unger. It was originaly based on Botrytis grisea Unger, 1833, but this name is an illegimate

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
13
homonym of Botrytis grisea (Link : Fr.) Duby, 1830, i.e., the citation as “Peronospora grisea
(Unger) Unger“ as stated in Constantinescu (1991: 45) is not correct and has to be altered to:
Peronospora grisea Unger, Bot. Zeitung 5(18): 315, 1847.
 Botrytis grisea Unger, Die Exantheme der Pflanzen: 172, 1833, nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1).
Fig. 31
Peronospora lamii A. Braun, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
325, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 94, 1857; Flora 40: 133, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 325 (fig. 32).
Fig. 32
Cylindrosporium phaseoli Rabenh. (as “Cylindrospora”), Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 4: no. 327, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 94, 1857; Flora 40: 134, 1857], nom. nud.
Torula pinophila (Nees) Chevall. var. ericicola Rabenh. (as “ericaecola”), Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 331b, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 94, 1857; Flora 40: 134,
1857], nom. nud.
Helminthosporium gramineum Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
332, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 94, 1857; Flora 40: 134, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a diagnosis on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 332 (fig. 33).
Fig. 33
Puccinia alliorum (DC.) Casp., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4:
no. 351, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 134, 1857], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non
Corda, 1840.

14
 Uredo alliorum DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 82, 1815.
Uromyces apiculatus (F. Strauss) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
362, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Uredo apiculata F. Strauss, Ann. Wetter. Gesellsch. Ges. Naturk. 2: 97 [“1810”] 1811.
Notes: This combination was validly published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 362 (fig. 34). Var. trifolii (no. 36), var. pisi-sativi (no. 363), and var. phaseoli (no.
364) are nomina nuda.
Fig. 34
Uromyces muricella (Wallr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
366, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Erysibe muricella Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 208, 1833.
 Uredo muricella (Wallr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. (Leipzig) 1: 6, 1844.
Notes: This combination was validly published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 366 (fig. 35).
Fig. 35
Uromyces muricella (Wallr.) Rabenh. var. oreoselini (F. Strauss) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 366, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Uredo oreoselini F. Strauss, Ann. Wetter. Gesellsch. Ges. Naturk. 2: 87, [“1810”] 1811.
Notes: This combination was published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
366 (fig. 35).
Aecidium compositarum Mart. var. lapsanae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 4: no. 370, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857], nom. nud.
Coleosporium senecionis (Schumach.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent.
4: no. 379, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Uredo senecionis Schumach., Enum. Pl. 2: 229, 1803.
 Caeoma senecionis (Schumach.) Schltdl., Fl. berol. (Berlin) 2: 119, 1824.
= Uredo farinosa ß senecionis Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 1: 218, 1801.
 Coleosporium senecionis (Pers.) Fr., Fl. Crypt. Flandres (Paris) 2: 53, 1867, nom. illeg. (Art.
53.1), non (Schumach.) Rabenh., 1857.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 379 (fig. 36). Rabenhorst (l.c.) cited “Schlecht.” as author of the basionym, which refers
to Caeoma senecionis (Schumach.) Schltdl., based on Uredo senecionis Schumach.
Fig. 36

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
15
Epitea longicapsula (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 384,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Uredo longicapsula DC., Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 2: 233, 1805.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 384 (fig. 37).
Fig. 37
Uredo leguminosarum Link var. medicaginis Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 4: no. 386, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 95, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857], nom. nud.
Uredo falcariae (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 390, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 96, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Spreng., 1827 (fig.
38).
 Aecidium falcariae DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 91, 1815.
Fig. 38
Podocystis lini (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 391, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 96, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non (Ehrenb.) Fr. 1849
(fig. 39).
 Uredo lini DC., in Lamarck & de Candolle, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 2: 234, 1805.
Fig. 39
Podocystis aecidioides (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
392, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 96, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Uredo aecidioides DC., in Lamarck & de Candolle, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 2: 236, 1805.
 Melampsora aecidioides (DC.) J. Schröt., in Cohn, Krypt.-Fl. Schlesien (Breslau) 3.1(17–24):
362 [“1889”] 1887.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 392 (fig. 40).
Fig. 40
Urocystis occulta (Wallr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no. 393,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 96, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Erysibe occulta Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 212, 1833.
 Polycystis occulta (Wallr.) Schltdl., Bot. Zeitung 10: 602, 1852.
 Urocystis occulta (Wallr.) A.A. Fisch. Waldh., Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 40: 257, 1867,
isonym.

16
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 393 (fig. 41).
Fig. 41
Ustilago destruens (Schltdl.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 4: no.
400, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 96, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857].
 Caeoma destruens Schltdl., Fl. berol. (Berlin) 2: 130, 1824.
 Sporisorium destruens (Schltdl.) Vánky, Symb. Bot. Upsal. 24(2): 115, 1985.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 400 (fig. 42).
Fig. 42
Cent. 5
Agaricus elasticus Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 405,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 171, 1857; Flora 40: 135, 1857], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Bolton
1788 (fig. 43).
 Collybia elastica Sacc. (as “(Lasch) Sacc.”), Syll. fung. (Abellini) 5: 212, 1887.
 Flammulina elastica (Sacc.) Redhead & R.H. Petersen, Mycotaxon 71: 293, 1999.
Fig. 43
Sphaeronaema amenticola Ces. (as “amenticolum”) in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 440, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 173, 1857; Flora 40: 136, 1857].
 Gnomonia amenticola (Ces.) Příhoda, Česká Mykol. 10(2): 122, 1956.
Notes: This is a valid species published with a diagnosis on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 440 (fig. 44).
Fig. 44

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
17
Spilosphaeria Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 442a, 1857 [Bot.
Zeitung 15: 173, 1857; Flora 40: 137, 1857].
Notes: The genus name Spilosphaeria was validly published in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 442a (fig. 45), with Septoria polygonorum Desm. as type species.
Fig. 45
Spilosphaeria polygonorum (Desm.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5:
no. 442a, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 173, 1857; Flora 40: 137, 1857].
 Septoria polygonorum Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 2, 17: 108, 1842.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 442a (fig. 45).
Heterosphaeria patella (Tode) Grev. var. campestris (Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 447, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 173, 1857; Flora 40: 137, 1857].
 Phacidium patella var. campestre Fr., Elench. fung. (Greifswald) 2: 134, 1828.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 447 (fig. 46).
Fig. 46
Phyllosticta cornicola (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 454,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 173, 1857; Flora 40: 137, 1857].
 Sphaeria lichenoides Sowerby var. cornicola DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn
3 (Paris) 5/6: 148, 1815.
 Septoria cornicola (DC.) Desm., Index Generum, Specierum et Synonymorum in J.B.H.J.
Desmazières, Plantes Cryptogams de France. Edit. 1, Ser, 1, Fasc. I-XLIV, 1825-1851. Edit.
II, Ser. 1, Fasc. I-XXXVII, 1836-1851 (Lille [Leleux]): 24, 1851.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 454 (fig. 47).
Fig. 47

18
Peronospora affinis Rossmann, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5:
no. 489, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 489 (fig. 48).
Fig. 48
Peronospora effusa (Gev.) Rabenh. var. intermedia Casp., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no. 490, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
= Botrytis viciae Berk., J. Hort. Soc., London 1: 31, 1846.
 Peronospora viciae (Berk.) Casp., Ber. Bekanntm. Verhandl. Königlich Preuss. Akad.
Wissensch. Berlin 3: 330, 1855.
= Peronospora viciae-sativae Gäum., Beitr. Kryptfl. Schweiz 5(4): 219, 1923.
Notes: This is a valid variety published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 490 (fig. 49). The type host (“Vicia”) is V. sativa subsp. nigra (= V.
angustifolia). The material deposited at HAL has been examined and the synonymy with P.
viciae has been confirmed.
Fig. 49
Oidium fusisporioides Fr. var. glechomatis Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 5: no. 491, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
 Fusisporium calceum Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 2, 17: 95, 1842.
= Ramularia calcea Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 17: no. 1681, 1852.
Notes: Rabenhorst introduced “var. glechomatis” without description/diagnosis, but cited
Fusisporium calceum as synonym (fig. 50). Therefore, var. glechomatis represents a new name
introduced at variety rank and is a homotypic synonym of Fusisporium calceum. Ramularia
calcea (l.c.) was introduced by Cesati without any reference to Fusisporium calceum.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
19
Fig. 50
Oidium fusisporioides Fr. var. lamii Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5:
no. 492, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857], nom. nud.
Melampsora salicinum (Pers. ex DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent.
5: no. 494, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
 Sclerotium salicinum Pers. ex DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6:
114, 1815.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 494 (fig. 51).
Fig. 51
Puccinia granulata de Bary, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no.
499, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
= Puccinia ribis DC., in Lamarck & de Candolle, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 2: 221, 1805.
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 499 (fig. 52).
Fig. 52
Tilletia endophylla de Bary, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 5: no.
500, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 174, 1857; Flora 40: 138, 1857].
= Tilletia olida (Riess) G. Winter, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.1: 107 [“1884”] 1881.
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 500 (fig. 53).
Fig. 53

20
Cent. 6
Excipula phaeotricha Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 515, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 405 1857; Flora 40: 378, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 515 (fig. 54).
Fig. 54
Phacidium populi Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 519,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 405 1857; Flora 40: 378, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 519 (fig. 55).
Fig. 55
Cryptodiscus lichenicola Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
523, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 406 1857; Flora 40: 379, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 523 (fig. 56).
Fig. 56
Sphaeria oropensis Ces. and Nectria oropensis Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 524, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 406 1857; Flora 40: 379, 1857].
 Paranectria oropensis (Ces.) D. Hawksw. & Piroz., Canad. J. Bot. 55(19): 2555, 1977.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
21
Notes: Sphaeria oropensis Ces. and Nectria oropensis Ces. are two valid species names
published simultaneously as alternative names (Art. 36.3, published before 1953) with a
description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 524 (fig. 57).
Fig. 57
Sphaeria lecanodes Ces. and Nectria lecanodes Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 525, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 407 1857; Flora 40: 380, 1857].
 Nectriopsis lecanodes (Ces.) Diederich & Schroers, in Sérusiaux, Diederich, Brand & van den
Boom, Lejeunia, n.s. 162: 56, 1999.
Notes: Sphaeria lecanodes Ces. and Nectria lecanodes Ces. are two valid species names
published simultaneously as alternative names (Art. 36.3, published before 1953) with a
description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 525 (fig. 58).
Fig. 58

22
Rhaphidospora disseminans (Riess) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6:
no. 530, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 427 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857].
 Ophiobolus disseminans Riess, Hedwigia 1(6): 27, 1854.
 Rhaphidospora disseminans (Riess) Ces. & De Not., Comm. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1(4): 233,
1863, isonym.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 530 (fig. 59).
Fig. 59
Leptospora huebneri Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 531, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 427 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857], nom. nud.
 Rhaphidophora huebneri Ces. & De Not. (as “(Rabenh.) Ces. & De Not.”), Comm. Soc.
Crittog. Ital. 1(4): 234, 1863.
 Ophiobolus huebneri (Ces. & De Not.) Sacc. (as “(Rabenh.) Sacc.”), Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2:
353, 1883.
Leptospora rubella (Pers.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 532,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 427 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857].
 Sphaeria rubella Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 1: 63, 1801.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 532 (fig. 60).
Fig. 60
Sphaeria polypodii Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 533, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 427 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857].
 Plectosphaera polypodii (Rabenh.) Arx, in von Arx & Müll, Beitr. Kryptfl. Schweiz 11(1):
208, 1954.
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 533 (fig. 61).
Fig. 61
Sphaeria aggregata Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
541, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857], nom. nud.
 Cenangium aggregatum Fuckel (as”(Lasch) Fuckel”), Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk.
23-24: 271 [“1869-70”] 1870.
 Leptosphaeria aggregata (Fuckel) O.E. Erikss., Non-lichenized Pyrenomycetes of Sweden
(Lund): 7, 1992.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
23
Sphaeria herbarum Pers. var. hyoscyami Lasch and Sphaeria vera Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 544, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 381,
1857], nom. nud.
Notes: Sphaeria herbarum Pers. var. hyoscyami Lasch and Sphaeria vera Lasch are alternative
names, but they were published without any description.
Sphaeria urticae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 545, 1857 [Bot.
Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857], nom. nud.
Pleospora herbarum (Pers.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
547a, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 381, 1857].
 Sphaeria herbarum Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 1: 78, 1801.
Notes: This combination was validly published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 547a (fig. 62). However, the genus name Pleospora was not validly published under
no. 547 (lacking description), but it was validated in Cent. 6 under no. 548. Pleospora herbarum
var. alii (Desm.) Rabenh. (no. 547a), var. anethi Rabenh. (no. 547d), var. brassicae Rabenh.
(no. 547b), var. fabae Rabenh. (no. 547c), and var. lupini Rabenh. (no. 547e) are invalid names.
Fig. 62
Pleospora Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 548, 1857 [Bot.
Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
Notes: The combination Pleospora leguminum (Wallr.) Rabenh. was introduced on the label of
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 548 (fig. 63), supplemented by a Latin description
which validates the genus name Pleospora.
Fig. 63
Pleospora leguminum (Wallr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
548, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Sphaeria leguminum Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 771, 1833.
Notes: The combination Pleospora leguminum (Wallr.) Rabenh. was validly introduced on the
label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 548 (fig. 63)
Spilosphaeria chelidonii (Lib.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
552, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Ascochyta chelidonii Lib., Pl. crypt. exsicc.: no. 204, 1834.
 Septoria chelidonii (Lib.) Desm., Ann Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 2, 17: 110, 1842.

24
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 552 (fig. 64).
Fig. 64
Spilosphaeria ruborum Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 553,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 553 (fig. 65).
Fig. 65
Spilosphaeria callae (Lasch ex Rabenh.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 6: no. 554, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Sphaeria (Depazea) callae Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 4: no. 368,
1842 [and Bot. Zeitung 1: 517, 1843], nom. nud.
 Depazea callae Lasch ex Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, Leipzig 1844.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 554 (fig. 66).
Fig. 66
Spilosphaeria hepaticae (Desm.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
555, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Septoria hepaticae Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 2 19: 340, 1843.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 555 (fig. 67).
Fig. 67
Spilosphaeria tiliae (Lasch) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 556,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Ascochyta tiliae Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 12: no. 1160, 1847.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
25
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 556 (fig. 68).
Fig. 68
Spilosphaeria scabiosae (Rabenh.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6:
no. 557, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Ascochyta scabiosae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 13: no. 1253, 1854.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 557 (fig. 69). Rabenhorst (l.c.) cited Septoria scabiosicola Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot.,
Sér. 3, 20: 96, 1853 as synonym, i.e., an older name that ought to have been adoped, but the
combination, based on a valid basionym, is nevertheless valid (Art. 52.4).
Fig. 69
Spilosphaeria saponariae (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
558, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Sphaeria saponariae DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 6: 146, 1815.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 558 (fig. 70).
Fig. 70
Spilosphaeria cannabis (Lasch) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
559, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Ascochyta cannabis Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 11: no. 1059,
1846.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 559 (fig. 71).
Fig. 71

26
Spilosphaeria petroselini Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 560,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 428 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 560 (fig. 72).
Fig. 72
Carlia Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 567, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung
15: 429 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
Notes: The genus Carlia was validly published with a descriptions on the label of Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 567 (fig. 73).
Fig. 73
Carlia oxalidis Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 567, 1857 [Bot.
Zeitung 15: 429 1857; Flora 40: 382, 1857].
 Laestadia oxalidis (Rabenh.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 429, 1882.
 Mycosphaerella oxalidis (Rabenh.) Magnus, Österr. Bot. Z. 44(6): 203, 1894.
= Mycosphaerella depazeiformis (Auersw.) Lindau (“depazeaeformis”), Hilfsb. Sammeln
Ascomyc. (Berlin): 72, 1903
Notes: Carlia oxalidis was validly published with a descriptions on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 567 (fig. 73). Aptroot (2006: 147) reduced this species to synonymy
with Mycosphaerella depazaeformis.
Passalora penicillata Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
587, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 429 1857; Flora 40: 383, 1857].
 Cercospora penicillata (Ces.) Fresen., Beitr. Mykol. 3: 93, 1863.
 Phaeoramularia penicillata (Ces.) X.J. Liu & Y.L. Guo, Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 12(4): 13,
1982.
= Exosporium depazeoides Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 3, 11(2): 364, 1849.
 Cercospora depazeoides (Desm.) Sacc., Mycoth. ven.: no. 187, 1875.
 Pseudocercospora depazeoides (Desm.) U. Braun & Crous, in Braun, Crous & Nakashima,
IMA Fungus 6(2): 420, 2015.
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 587 (fig. 74).

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
27
Fig. 74
Fusicladium fuscescens Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 588,
1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 430 1857; Flora 40: 383, 1857].
= Fusicladium pyrorum (Lib.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassuaischen Vereins Naturk. 23-24: 357 “1869”,
1870.
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 588 (fig. 75). The full synonymy is listed in Schubert et al. (2003: 82).
Fig. 75
Fusisporium aequivocum Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no.
597, 1857 [Bot. Zeitung 15: 430 1857; Flora 40: 384, 1857].
 Ramularia aequivoca (Ces.) Sacc., Fungi italica autogr. del. 17-28: tab. 994, 1881.
= Ramularia didyma Unger, Exanth. Pfl. (Wien): 169, 1833.
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 597 (fig. 76). The taxonomy and full synonymy are listed in Braun
(1998: 239).
Fig. 76

28
Fusidium adoxae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 6: no. 598, 1857
[Bot. Zeitung 15: 430 1857; Flora 40: 384, 1857], nom. nud.
 Cercosporella adoxae E. Bommer & M. Rousseau [as “(Rabenh.) E. Bommer & M.
Rousseau”], Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique 23: 289, 1884.
 Cylindrospora adoxae (E. Bommer & M. Rousseau) J. Schröt. [as “(Rabenh.) J. Schröt.”], in
Cohn, Krypt.-Fl. Schles., Pilze II (Breslau): 488, 1897.
= Ramularia adoxae P. Karst., Hedwigia 23: 7, 1884.
Notes: Fusidium adoxae is a nom. nud., published without description. This name was validated
by Bommer & Roussseau (1884: 298). They introduced a combination based on Fusidium
adoxae and added a brief description (“La partie des feuilles attaquée pa le champignon est
complètemet grise et flétrie”). Thus, the name Cercosporella adoxae, although published as
combination, must be attributed as new species to Bommer and Rousseau, and the combination
Cylindrospora adoxae was based on the latter name. Ramularia adoxae, the valid name for this
fungus, was sometimes cited as combination based on Fusidium adoxae, but Karsten (l.c.)
described a new species. In the protologue, F. adoxae was not cited, and an indirect reference to
this older name is not evident and the type material is a collections from Finland deposited at H
(see Braun 1998: 46, 48).
Cent. 7
Daedalea unicolor (Bull.) Fr. var. polyporosa Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 614, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 79 1858; Flora 41: 388, 1858].
Notes: This variety was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 614 (fig. 77).
Fig. 77
Polyporus occultus Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no.
617, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 79 1858; Flora 41: 388, 1858].
= Abortiporus biennis (Bull.) Singer, Mycologia 36(1): 68, 1944.
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 617 (fig. 78). Lasch (l.c.) added two unranked taxa, ) effusus and β)
pileatus.
Fig. 78
Micula Duby ex Rabenhorst, in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 636, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 79 1858; Flora 41: 389, 1858].
Notes: This genus Micula was validated by Rabenhorst in Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 636
with a description (fig. 79). Duby introduced this name together with the new name Micula
mougeotii, based on Sphaeria macula, on a plate with analysis published in Hedwigia 2: 8, Tab.
I, A, 1–8, 1858. However, Art. 38.1 only applies to species, but not to genus names, and the
conditions for a valid simultaneous publication by provision of a single description (descriptio

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
29
generico-specifica) or diagnosis according to Art. 38.5 (and 38.7) are not fulfilled since
condition (b) is not satisfied.
Fig. 79
Micula mougeotii Duby ex Rabenhorst, in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no.
636, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 79 1858; Flora 41: 389, 1858], nom. nov.
 Sphaeria micula Fr., Elench. fung. (Greifswald) 2: 101, 1828.
 Dermatea micula (Fr.) Rehm, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.3(Lief. 55): 1258, 1896.
 Dumortieria micula (Fr.) Westend., Bull. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique, Cl. Sci., Sér. 2, 2(7): 572,
1857.
Notes: The new name Micula mougeotii, based on Sphaeria micula, was validly introduced by
Rabenhorst in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 636, 1858 (fig. 79).
Sphaerella recutita (Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 659,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 80, 1858; Flora 41: 389, 1858].
 Sphaeria recutita Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 524, 1823.
 Mycosphaerella recutita (Fr.) Johanson, Öfvers. K. Svensk. Vetensk.-Akad. Förhandl. 41(9):
166, [“1884-1885”] 1884.
Notes: The combination Sphaerella recutita was validly published on the label of Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 659 (fig. 80).The status of Sphaeria recutita has been discussed
by Aptroot (2006: 173).
Fig. 80
Sphaeronaema piceae Fiedl., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no.
664, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 82, 1858; Flora 41: 390, 1858].
 Sclerophoma piceae (Fiedl.) Höhn., Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-
naturwiss. Cl., Abt. 1, 118: 1234, 1909.
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 664 (fig. 81).

30
Fig. 81
Rhytisma nervale (Alb. & Schwein.) Rabenh. [as “(Alb. & Schwein.) Fr.”], Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 666, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 82, 1858; Flora 41: 390, 1858].
 Xyloma nervale Alb. & Schwein., Consp. fung. (Leipzig): 64, 1805.
 Sclerotium nervale (Alb. & Schwein.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(1): 260, 1822.
 Rhytisma nervale (Alb. & Schwein.) Rehm, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.3(Lief. 29):
87, 1888, isonym.
Notes: The combination Rhytisma nervale was introduced by Rabenhorst in Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 666, 1858 (fig. 82).
Fig. 82
Rhytisma nervale (Alb. & Schwein.) Rabenh. f. bartsiae Ces. ex Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 666, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 82, 1858; Flora 41: 390, 1858].
Notes: This forma was validly published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 666, 1858 (fig. 81) by Rabenhorst who added a diagnosis under “Obs. … L. R.” (=
Ludwig Rabenhorst).
Rhytisma pedicularis (DC.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 667,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 82, 1858; Flora 41: 390, 1858].
 Xyloma pedicularis DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 153, 1815.
 Ectostroma pedicularis (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 602, 1823.
 Rhytisma pedicularis (DC.) Rehm, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.3(Lief. 29): 87
[“1896”] 1888, isonym.
 Asteroma pedicularis (DC.) Jaap, Ann. Mycol. 15(1/2): 117, 1917.
 Pseudopeziza pedicularis (DC.) E. Müll. & Schüepp, Phytopathol. Z. 25(3): 330, 1956.
 Leptotrochila pedicularis (DC.) Schüepp, Phytopathol. Z. 36: 242, 1959.
Notes: The combination Rhytisma pedicularis was introduced by Rabenhorst in Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 667, 1858 (fig. 83).
Fig. 83
Peronospora calotheca de Bary, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7:
no. 673, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 82, 1858; Flora 41: 390, 1858].
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 673 (fig. 84).

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
31
Fig. 84
Puccinia coronata Corda var. sertata (Preuss) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 7: no. 681, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858].
 Puccinia sertata Preuss, in J. Sturm, Deutschl. Fl., Abth. III, Die Pilze Deutschlands, Band 6,
Heft 25–26: 5, Tab. 3, 1848
Notes: This is a valid combination published by Rabenhorst in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 681, 1858 (fig. 85).
Fig. 85
Puccinia liliacearum Duby f. muscari-comosi Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 686, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858].
Notes: This is a valid forma published by Cesati in Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 686, 1858 (fig. 86).
Fig. 86
Puccinia compacta de Bary, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no.
688, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Kunze,
1828.
 Sclerotelium compactum Syd. [as “(de Bary) Syd.”], Ann. Mycol. 19(3-4): 172, 1921.
= Puccinia pulsatillae Kalchbr., Mathem. Természettud. Közlem. 3: 307, 1865.
Notes: This species was published with a description on the the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 688, 1858 (fig. 87), but it is an illegitimate homonym.
Fig. 87

32
Podocystis pustulata (DC.) Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7:
no. 689, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858].
 Uredo bistortarum a pustulata DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6:
76, 1815.
 Microbotryum pustulatum (DC.) R. Bauer & Oberw., in Bauer, Oberwinkler & Vánky,
Canad. J. Bot. 75(8): 1309, 1997.
Notes: The combination Podocystis pustulata was validly published on the label of Klotzschii
Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 689, 1858 (fig. 88).
Fig. 88
Podocystis pustulata (DC.) Ces. var. stellariae Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 689, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858], nom. nud.
Polycystis ranunculacearum (DC.) Fr. [as “Podocystis”] f. anemones Ces., in Rabenh.,
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 690, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858;
Flora 41: 391, 1858].
= Urocystis anemones (Pers.) G. Winter, Hedwigia 19: 160, 1880.
Notes: This is a validly published forma, introduced as substrate form (fig. 89).
Fig. 89
Aecidium compositarum Mart. f. doronici Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 7: no. 691, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858].
= Aecidium pardalianches Bergam., Giorn. Fis. Chim. Storia Nat. Med. Arti, Dec. 2, 7: 280,
1824.
Notes: This is a validly published forma, introduced as substrate form (fig. 90).
Fig. 90
Uromyces fraternus Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 693,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858], nom. illeg. (superfl., Art. 52.1).
Notes: Cesati (l.c.) introduced a new name, but cited the valid name Uredo sororia Ces. as
synonym (fig. 91).
Fig. 91
Coleosporium rhinanthacearum (DC.) Lév. var. euphrasiae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 7: no. 694, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858],
nom. nud.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
33
Epitea potentillarum Fr. var. agrimoniae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 7: no. 696, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 83, 1858; Flora 41: 391, 1858], nom. nud.
Cent. 8
Peziza carestiae Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 704,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 302, 1858; Flora 41: 651, 1858], nom. nud.
 Peziza carestiae Ces. ex Cooke, Mycographia: [135], 1879.
 Humaria carestiae (Ces. ex Cooke) Boud., Hist. Class. Discom. Eur. (Paris): 67, 1907.
 Kotlabaea carestiae (Ces. ex Cooke) Benkert, Österr. Z. Pilzk. 17: 175, 2008.
 Neottiella carestiae (Ces. ex Cooke) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 8: 192, 1889.
 Pyronema carestiae (Ces. ex Cooke) Bres., Ann. Mycol. 1(2): 119, 1903.
 Byssonectria carestiae (Ces. ex Cooke) U. Lindem. & Kristiansen, Z. Mykol. 83(1): 116,
2017.
= Kotlabaea trondii Benkert & Kristiansen, Z. Mykol. 65(1): 36, 1999.
Notes: The name Peziza carestiae Ces. was introduced on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv.
Mycol., Ed. Nova, 704, but without any description or diagnosis (nom. nud.). Rabenhorst added
the note “NB. A Pez. theleboloidi Alb. et Schw. vix diversa!” (barely different from Peziza
theleboloides, Fig. 92). The name Peziza carestiae Ces. appeared also on the labels of Erbar
Crittogam. Ital. 271 (1271) [“Peziza carestiae, sopra Riva in Valsesia, Luglio 1857. Carestia”]
and Erbar Crittogam. Ital. Ser. II 288 [“Peziza carestiae, Riva di Valsesia, Carestia”], but in both
cases without any descriptions. Cooke (1879: [135]) validated this species by adding a brief
description and illustration (plate 60, fig. 235).
Fig. 92
Peziza mollissima Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 708,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 302, 1858; Flora 41: 651, 1858], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Saut. 1841.
 Trichopeziza mollissima Fuckel [as “(Lasch) Fuckel”], Jahrb. Nassauischen Ver. Naturk. 23-
24: 296 [“1869-70”] 1870.
 Lachnum mollissimum (Fuckel) P. Karst., Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 19: 174, 1871.
= Peziza sulphurea var. leucophaea Pers., Mycol. eur. (Erlanga) 1: 250, 1822.
 Peziza leucophaea (Pers.) Nyl., Not. Sällsk. Fauna Fl. Fenn. Förh., Ny Ser. 10: 31, [“1869”]
1868, nom. illeg., non Berk. & M.A. Curtis, 1860.
 Lachnum leucophaeum (Pers.) P. Karst., Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 19: 177, 1871.
Notes: Peziza mollissima Lasch was published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 708 with a description (fig. 93), but this name is an illegitimate homonym, validated by
Fuckel (1870) as Trichopeziza mollissima Fuckel.
Fig. 93
Stictis graminicola Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
713, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 302, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].

34
Notes: This is a valid species published with a description on the label of of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 713 (fig. 94).
Fig. 94
Cordyceps myrmecophila Ces. [as “(Ces.) Ces”], in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 8: no. 719, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 302, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
 Hypocrea myrmecophila Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 11: no. 1033,
1846 [and Bot. Zeitung 4: 877, 1846; Flora 31: 505, 1848], nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non Fr.,
1825.
 Ophiocordyceps myrmecophila (Ces.) G.H. Sung, J.M. Sung, Hywel-Jones & Spatafora, in
Sung, Hywel-Jones, Sung, Luangsa-ard, Shrestha & Spatafora, Stud. Mycol. 57: 45, 2007.
Notes: The name Cordyceps myrmecophila was first validly published by Cesati in Rabenh.,
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 719, 1858 (fig. 95). The first publication as “Hypocrea
(Cordyceps) myrmecophila” in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 11: no. 1033, 1846
was not meant to be an introduction of alternative names. It referred to “Hypocrea A.
Cordyceps” in Fries (1825: 105).
Fig. 95
Perisporium occultatum Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
721, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 302, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
Notes: This species was validly published with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 721 (fig. 96)
Fig. 96
Nodulosphaeria Rabenh. and Nodulosphaeria hirta Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 8: no. 725, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
Notes: This genus and its type species were validly published with descriptions on the label of
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 725, 1858 (fig. 97). Nodulisphaeria was later rejected
against Leptosphaeria Ces. & De Not., 1863.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
35
Fig. 97
Gibberidea (Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 726, 1858 [Bot.
Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
 Sphaeria b Gibberidea Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sectio Post. (Stockholm): 395, 1849.
Notes: Rabenhorst introduced the genus name Gibberidea as combination based on Sphaeria b
Gibberidea Fr. (indirect reference), together with the combination G. spartii, in Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 726, 1858 (fig. 98).
Fig. 98
Gibberidea spartii (Nees : Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
726, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
 Sphaeria spartii Nees, in Schmidt & Kunze, Deutschl. Schwämme, Achte Lieferung: 2, 1818
(: Fr., Syst. mycol. 2(2): 424, 1823).
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 726, 1858 (fig. 98).
Sphaeria typharum (Desm.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 731,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 652, 1858].
 Sphaeria scirpicola var. typharum Desm., Pl. cryptog. Fr.: no. 1428, 1849.
 Juncaceicola typharum (Desm.) Tennakoon, Phook. & K.D. Hyde, in Tennakoon, Hyde,
Phookamsak & Promputtha, Cryptog. Mycol. 37(2): 151, 2016.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 731, 1858 (fig. 99).
Fig. 99

36
Sphaeria petasitidis Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 733, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. nud.
Staurosphaeria Rabenh. and Staurosphaeria lycii Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, Cent. 8: no. 736, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
Notes: The genus Staurosphaeria and its type species Staurosphaeria lycii are validly published
by provision of a single description (descriptio generico-specifica, Art. 38.5) on the label of
Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 736, 1858 (fig. 100).
Fig. 100
Sphaeropsis vaginae (Lasch) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
737, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
 Sphaeria vaginae Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 7: no. 663, 1844
[and Arch. Pharm. (Lemgo) 91: 375, 1845; Bot. Zeitung 3(4): 67, 1845].
Notes: This combination was validly published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol.,
Ed. Nova, 737, 1858 (fig. 101).
Fig. 101
Asteroma veronicarum Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 739,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1).
Notes: Rabenhorst (l.c.) cited Sphaeria abjecta Wallr. as synonym. A description is not added.
Spilosphaeria aegopodii (Pers.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
741, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858]
 Sphaeria aegopodii Pers., Observ. mycol. (Lipsiae) 1: 17, 1796.
 Ascospora aegopodii (Pers.) Fr., Syst. orb. veg. (Lundae) 1: 112, 1825.
 Spilosphaeria aegopodii (Pers.) Fuckel, Fungi Rhen. Exs., Fasc. 1-8: no. 451, 1863, isonym.
 Stigmatea aegopodii (Pers.) Oudem., Ned. Kruidk. Arch., Sér. 2, 2: 185, 1876.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 741, 1858 (fig. 102) with reference to Ascospora aegopodii (Pers.) Fr. as synonym cited
in the protologue.
Fig. 102

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
37
Depazea nerii Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 743, 1858 [Bot.
Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. nud.
Rhabdospora alsines Mont., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
744, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. nud.
Rhaphidospora urticae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 745,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. illeg. (Art. 52.1).
Notes: This is a superfluous name (Sphaeria erythrospora Riess was cited as synonym in the
protologue, fig. 103).
Fig. 103
Pleospora pellita (Fr.) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 749, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
 Sphaeria pellita Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 503, 1823.
 Pyrenophora pellita (Fr.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: 280, 1883.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 749, 1858 (fig. 104)
Fig. 104
Pleospora asparagi Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 750, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. nud.
 Pleospora asparagi Rabenh. ex Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 2: 268, 1883.
Trullula spartii (Rabenh.) Ces., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8:
no. 752, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
 Cesatia spartii Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Cent. 15: no. 1443, 1850 [and Bot.
Zeitung 9: 180, 1851; Flora 34: 74, 1851].
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 752, 1858 (fig. 105).
Fig. 105
Cytospora oxyacanthae Rabenh. [as “Cytispora”], Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 8: no. 754, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 754, 1858 (fig. 106).

38
Fig. 106
Hymenula spartii Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 755,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 755, 1858 (fig. 107).
Fig. 107
Stilbum herbarum Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 763, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858].
 Stilbella herbarum (Rabenh.) Lindau, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.9: 299, 1908.
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 763, 1858 (fig. 108).
Fig. 108
Byssocladium cerevisiae Auersw., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8:
no. 764, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 653, 1858], nom. nud.
Haplaria viridis (Link) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 770,
1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 654, 1858]
 Chloridium viride Link, Mag. Gesell. Naturf. Freunde, Berlin 3(1-2): 13, 1809.
Notes: This is a valid combination published on the label of Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed.
Nova, 770, 1858 (fig. 109).
Fig. 109
Botrytis brunneola Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no. 771, 1858
[Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 654, 1858].
Notes: This is a validly published species with a description on the label of Klotzschii Herb.
Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 771, 1858 (fig. 110).

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
39
Fig. 110
Peronospora holostei Casp., in Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, Cent. 8: no.
774, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 654, 1858], nom. nud.
 Peronospora holostei Casp. ex de Bary, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 4, 20: 115, 1863.
= Peronospora conferta (Unger) Unger f. holosteri Fuckel, Fungi Rhen. Exs., Fasc. I: no. 17,
1863.
Notes: Peronospora holostei was introduced in Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova, 774,
1858, but without description (nom. nud.), and was later validated by de Bary (l.c.). P. conferta
f. holostei is a valid forma, although without any description, introduced as substrate (host)
forma of a pathogenic fungus.
Tubercularia confluens Pers. var. sophorae Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Ed. Nova,
Cent. 8: no. 778, 1858 [Bot. Zeitung 16: 303, 1858; Flora 41: 654, 1858], nom. nud.
Overlooked combinations in Depazea, introduced in Rabenhorst (1844)
Fries (1818) introduced the genus Depazea Fr. (type species: D. frondicola Fr.). Later, he
reduced this name to synonymy with Sphaeria (Fries 1823: 318, 527), and other authors
followed, e.g. Wallroth (1833). Rabenhorst (1844) recognized Depazea and assigned numerous
species to this genus. Later, Fries (1849) treated Depazea again as a genus of its own and listed
nine species, including some omitted taxonomic novelties (see below).
Based on results of phylogenetic analyses, the type species of Depazea, D. frondicola, has
recently been reallocated to Sphaerulina Sacc. (Verkley et al. 2013: 296)), i.e., the older name
Depazea is a synonym of Sphaerulina. Therefore, a proposal to conserve the genus name
Sphaerulina over Depazea is necessary.
Depazea aegopodii (Pers. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 139, 1844.
 Sphaeria aegopodii Pers., Observ. mycol. (Lipsiae) 1: 17, 1796 [: Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae)
2(2): 526, 1823].
Depazea aesculicola (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria aesculicola Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
 Septoria aesculicola (Fr.) Sacc., Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 5(4): 122, 1890.
Depazea brassicicola (Duby) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, 1844, nom. illeg.
(Art. 53.1), non D. brassicicola Desm., 1826.
 Sphaeria brassicicola Duby [as “brassicaecola”], Bot. Gall., Edn 2 (Paris) 2: 712, 1830.
Depazea buxicola (DC.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 136, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. buxicola DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris)
6: 149, 1815.
 Sphaeria buxicola (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 258, 1823.
 Mycosphaerella buxicola (DC.) Tomilin, Nov. Sist. Niz. Rast. 6: 119 [“1969”] 1970.

40
Depazea calthicola (DC. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 139, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. calthicola DC. [as “calthaecola”], in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl.
franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 6: 149, 1815.
 Sphaeria calthicola (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 532, 1823.
Depazea castaneicola (DC. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. castaneicola DC. [as “castaneaecola”], in de Candolle & Lamarck,
Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 6: 147, 1815.
 Sphaeria castaneicola (DC.) Fr. [as “castaneaecola”], Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
Notes: Fries (l.c.) cited “Dec. l. c. b.”, i.e., he undoubtedly refered to Sphaeria lichenoides var.
castaneicola DC. as in other cases in his treatment of Sphaeria spp. Rabenhorst (l.c.) cited “De
C.” (= de Candolle) as well.
Depazea convolvulicola (DC.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. convolvulicola DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3
(Paris) 5/6: 148, 1815.
 Sphaeria gentianicola var. convolvulicola (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 531, 1823.
Depazea cornicola (DC. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. cornicola DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris)
5/6: 148, 1815.
 Sphaeria cornicola (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
 Sphaerulina cornicola (DC. : Fr.) Verkley, Quaedvl. & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 75(1): 295,
2013.
Depazea crispans (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, 1844.
 Sphaeria crispans Fr., Elench. fung. (Greifswald) 2: 111, 1828.
Depazea dianthi (Alb. & Schwein.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria dianthi Alb. & Schwein., Consp. fung. (Leipzig): 47, 1805.
 Septoria dianthi (Alb. & Schwein.) Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., Sér. 3, 11(2): 346, 1849.
 Ascochyta dianthi (Alb. & Schwein.) Berk., Outl. Brit. Fung. (London): 320, 1860.
Notes: Mel’nik (1977) regarded this species as a synonym of Septoria dianthi (Alb. &
Schwein.) Desm. ( Ascochyta dianthi (Alb. & Schwein.) Berk.). Desmazières (1849) cited
Sphaeria dianthi Alb. & Schwein. as synonym of his Septoria dianthi, i.e., he introduced a new
combination based on the latter name.
Depazea fagicola (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria fagicola Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 529, 1823.
 Sphaerella fagicola (Fr.) Auersw., in Gonnermann & Rabenhorst, Mycol. eur. Abbild.
Sämmtl. Pilze Eur. 5-6: 7, 1869.
Notes: According to Aptroot (2006: 89) possibly identical with Mycosphaerella punctiformis (=
Ramularia endophylla).
Depazea fragariicola (Wallr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, 1844.
 Sphaeria fragariicola Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 767, 1833.
Depazea gentianicola (DC : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 138, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. gentianicola DC. [as “gentianaecola”], in de Candolle & Lamarck,
Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 148, 1815.
 Sphaeria gentianicola (DC.) Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 531, 1823.
 Leptothyrium gentianicola (DC. : Fr.) Bäumler, Hedwigia 24: 75, 1885.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
41
Depazea juglandina (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844, nom. illeg. (Art.
52.1)
 Xyloma juglandis DC., in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl. franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 5/6: 158, 1815,
non Sphaeria juglandis DC. 1815.
 Sphaeria juglandina Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 621, 1823 (nom. nov.).
 Phyllosticta juglandis (DC.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 3: 31, 1884.
Notes: Fries (1823: 621) introduced Sphaeria juglandina as new name for Xyloma juglandis
DC. Rabenhorst (1844) cited de Candolle’s name as synonym of D. juglandina, but failed to
introduce the correct combination “Depazaea juglandis”. In Elench. fung. (Greifswald) 2: 110,
1828, Fries added a description to Sphaeria (Depazea) juglandicola. Xyloma juglandis is
probably a species of Phoma (van der Aa & Vanev 2002).
Depazea lychnidis (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria lychnidis Fr. in Kunze & J.C. Schmidt, Mykologische Hefte (Leipzig) 2: 53, 1823
[Fr., Systema Mycologicum 2(2): 531, 1823].
 Phyllosticta lychnidis (Fr.) Ellis & Everh., North American Phyllostictas (New Jersey): 59
1900.
Notes: Fries is the author of the chapter in the booklet published by Kunze & Schmidt (1823).
Therefore, new names published in this chapter have to be ascribed to Fries as author. The
identity of this species is unclear. Van der Aa & Vanev (2002) did not examine type material.
Secondary collections deposited under this name turned out to belong to Phoma exigua Desm.
Depazea ostruthii (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 139, 1844.
 Sphaeria ostruthii Fr., Observ. mycol. (Havniae) 1: 174, 1815.
 Stigmatea ostruthii (Fr.) Oudem. ex Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 545, 1882.
Depazea pyrolae (Ehrenb. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 136, 1844.
 Sphaeria pyrolae Ehrenb., Sylv. mycol. berol. (Berlin): 29, 1818 [: Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae)
2(2): 528, 1823].
Notes: The identity and affinity of Sphaeria pyrolae is unclear. Aptroot (2006) failed to trace
type material of this species. He examined several collections deposited under this name and
observed that they were morphologically indistinguishable from Mycosphaerella punctiformis
(Pers.) Stärbeck (= Ramularia endophylla Verkley & U. Braun). Eriksson (1992) cited this
name as synonym of Mycosphaerella chimaphilae (Ellis & Everh.) Höhn. (synonymy not based
on type material).
Depazea quercicola (DC. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria quercicola Wallr., Fl. crypt. Germ. (Norimbergae) 2: 768, 1833.
Depazea ribicola (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria ribicola Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
 Phyllosticta ribicola (Fr.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 3: 17, 1884.
Notes: The identity of this species is unclear (see van der Aa & Vanev 2002: 398–399).
Depazea salicicola (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria salicicola Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
 Sphaerella salicicola (Fr.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 106, [“1869-
70”] 1870.
 Septoria salicicola (Fr.) Sacc., Michelia 1(2): 171, 1878.
 Mycosphaerella salicicola (Fr.) Johanson ex Oudem., Rév. Champ. Pays-Bas (Amsterdam) 2:
210, 1897.
Notes: Fuckel (1870) cited “Depazea” salicicola Fr. as synonym of Sphaerella salicicola, i.e.,
Sphaeria salicicola is the basionym of a new combination, and the combination Mycosphaerella
salicicola is accordingly based on Sphaeria salicicola as well (see also Aptroot 2006: 179). This

42
species seems to be a synonym of Mycosphaerella punctiformis (= Ramularia endophylla) [see
Tomilin 1979].
Depazea stemmatea (Fr. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria stemmatea Fr., Kongl. Vetensk. Acad. Handl. 38: 246, 1817 [: Fr., Syst. mycol.
(Lundae) 2(2): 528, 1823].
 Mycosphaerella stemmatea (Fr. : Fr.) Romell, Fungi Paras. Scand. Exs., Fasc. 1: no. 68, 1890.
Notes: see Aptroot (2006: 190).
Depazea subradians (Fr. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 139, 1844.
 Sphaeria subradians Fr., K. Svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl., Ser. 3, 38: 248, 1817 [: Fr., Syst.
mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 525, 1823].
 Mycosphaerella subradians (Fr.) J. Schröt., in Cohn, Krypt.-Fl. Schlesien (Breslau) 3.2(3):
339, 1894.
Depazea tremulicola (DC. : Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 137, 1844.
 Sphaeria lichenoides var. tremulicola DC. [as “tremulaecola”], in de Candolle & Lamarck, Fl.
franç., Edn 3 (Paris) 6: 147, 1815.
 Sphaeria tremulicola (DC.) Fr. [as “tremulaecola”], Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 529, 1823.
 Mycosphaerella tremulicola (DC. : Fr.) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 38: 248, 1940.
Notes: Tomilin (1979) reduced this species to synonymy with Mycosphaerella punctiformis (=
Ramularia endophylla).
Depazea vagans (Fr.) Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1 (Pilze): 139, 1844.
 Sphaeria vagans Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 532, 1823.
Depazea names introduced in Fries (1849)
Depazea aesculicola (Fr.) Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sec. Post.: 423, 1849.
 Sphaeria aesculicola Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae) 2(2): 530, 1823.
Depazea alpina Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sec. Post.: 423, 1849.
Note: A valid name (with description/diagnosis).
Depazea populicola Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sec. Post.: 423, 1849, nom. nud.
Notes: Fries (l.c.) only added the note “a priori diversa”.
Depazea punctiformis (Pers. : Fr.) Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sec. Post.: 423, 1849.
 Sphaeria punctiformis Pers., Ann. Bot. (Usteri) 11: 26, 1794 [: Fr., Syst. mycol. (Lundae)
2(2): 525, 1823].
 Mycosphaerella punctiformis (Pers.) Starbäck, Bih. K. Svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Afd. 3
15(2): 9, 1889.
= Ramularia endophylla Verkley & U. Braun, in Verkley et al., Mycol. Res. 108(11): 1276,
2004.
Depazea vaccinii Fr., Summa veg. Scand., Sec. Post.: 422, 1849.
Notes: This is a validly published species with a diagnosis in a footnote.
Acknowledgements
Sincere thanks are due to Prof. Donald Pfister and Genevieve E. Tocci, Harvard University
Herbaria, Cambridge, Mass., USA, for providing a copy of Schmidt & Kunze, Deutschlands
Schwämme, Fünfte Lieferung: 5, 1816.

Schlechtendalia 35 (2018)
43
Literature
Aptroot, A. 2006: Mycosphaerella and ist anamorphs: 2. Conspectus of Mycosphaerella. CBS
Biodiversity Series 5: 1–231.
Bommer, E. & Rousseau, M. 1884: Florule mycologique des environs de Bruxelles. Bulletin de la Société
Royale de Botanique de Belgique 23: 15–365, 1884.
Braun, U. 1998: A monograph of Cercosporella, Ramularia and allied genera (phytopathogenic
hyphomycetes). Vol. 2. IHW-Verlag Eching.
Braun, U. 2018: Annotated list of taxonomic novelties published in “Herbarium Vivum Mycologicum”
issued by J. F. Klotzsch and G. L. Rabenhorst between 1832 and 1855. Schlechtendalia 34: 3–90.
Constantinescu, O. 1991: An annotated list od Peronospora names. Thunbergia 15: 1–110.
Cooke, M. C. 1879: Mycographia, seu Icones fungorum. Figures of fungi from all parts of the world,
drawn and illustrated by M. C. Cooke. Vol. 1. Discomycetes, part 1. [4]. London.
Cooke, W. B. & Shaw C. G. 1952: Western Fungi. III. Mycologia 44: 795–812.
Desmazières, J. B. H. J. 1849: Sur les plantes cryptogames récemment découvertes en France. Annales
des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, Sér. 3, 11(2): 338–365.
Eriksson, O. E. 1992: The non-lichenized pyrenomycetes of Sweden. Lund.
Fries, E. M. 1818: Observationes mycologicae praecipue ad illustrandam Floram Suecicam. Pars
secundam. Havniae.
Fries, E. M. 1825: Systema orbis vegetabilis. Pars I. Plantae homonemeae. Lundae.
Fries, E. M. 1823: Systema mycologicum. Vol. II. Lundae.
Fries, E. M. 1832: Systema mycologicum. Vol. III. Gryphiswaldiae.
Fries, E. M. 1849: Summa vegetabilium Scandinaviae, Sectio Posterior. Stockholm.
Fuckel, K. W. G. L. 1870: Symbolae Mycologicae. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Rheinischen Pilze.
Jahrbücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde 23-24: 1–459.
Kohlmeyer, J. 1962: Index Alphabeticus Klotzschii et Rabenhorstii Herbarii Mycologici. Beihefte zur
Nova Hedwigia 4: 1–230.
Kunze & Schmidt (1823): Mykologische Hefte. Zweites Heft. Leipzig.
Mel’nik, V. A. 1977: Opredelitel’ gribov roda Ascochyta Lib. Leningrad.
Rabenhorst, G. L. 1844: Deutschlands Kryptogamen-Flora 1 (Pilze). Leipzig.
Rabenhorst, G. L. 1851: Index alphabeticus et conspectus systematicus in Klotzschii Herbarium Vivum
Mycologicum. Dresden.
Strauss, F. 1810: Über die Persoonschen Pilzgattungen Stilbospora, Uredo und Puccinia. Annalen der
Wetterauischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammte Naturkunde 2: 79–114.
Tomilin, B. A. 1979: Opredelitel’ gibov roda Mycosphaerella Johans. Leningrad.
Tulasne, L. R. 1854: Second mémoire sur les Urédinées et les Ustilaginées. Annales des Sciences
Naturelles, Ser. 4, Botanique, 2: 77–196.
Van der Aa, H. A. & Vanev, S. 2002: A revision of the species described in Phyllactinia. CBS, Utreecht.
Verkley, G. J. M., Quaedvlieg, W., Shin, H. D. & Crous, P. W. 2013: A new approach to species
delimitation in Septoria. Studies in Mycology. 75: 213–305.
Wallroth, F. W. 1833: Flora cryptogamica Germaniae.Band 2. Norimbergiae.
Willdenow, C. L. von 1825. Species plantarum [...] Editio quarta [...] Tomus VI. Pars II, Berolini.
Winter, G. 1880: Bemerkungen über einige Uredineen. Hedwigia 19(2): 17–29.
Address of the author
Uwe Braun, Martin-Luther-Universität, Institut für Biologie, Bereich Geobotanik und Botanischer
Garten, Neuwerk 21, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany.
(E-mail: uwe.braun@botanik.uni-halle.de)