ArticlePDF Available

The Glass Ceiling Conundrum: Illusory belief or Barriers that impede Women's Career Advancement in the Workplace

Authors:

Abstract

Given the preponderance of women in the workforce, it remained a puzzle why the entry of women into higher managerial positions remains restricted and why the syndrome of 'think manager think male is growing progressively? The objective of this paper is to examine the glass ceiling conundrum with a view of ascertain how it limits women's career advancement in the workplace. Extensive review of literature was presented and discussed. The paper revealed that women are not making it to the very top of their career not as a result of lack of requisite qualifications, and experience etc.; but as a result of factors that are rooted in cultural, societal, organizational, individual and psychological factors that inhibit women career advancement. Against the aforementioned background, the paper concludes that women advance marginally to certain level in corporate executive cadre, before they experience 'glass ceiling' that impedes their prospect of attaining senior executive position. Accordingly, women compared to men represent an insignificant fraction of those in managerial positions due to cultural prejudice, religion convictions, family related issues, individual and organizational influences. Similarly, inadequate opportunity to networks and seek sponsorship limits women progression to top managerial hierarchy. The study recommends the need to articulate policy frameworks that promote strong organizational culture and a more helpful and supportive environment to develop women leadership skills. Similarly, there is need to promote sponsorship for women in a way and manner that safeguard the relationships between sponsors and protégés.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
137
Rahim Ajao Ganiyu
University of Lagos (Nigeria)
Akintunde Oluwafemi
University of Lagos (Nigeria)
Afolabi Abiodun Ademola
University of Nsukka (Nigeria)
Okikiola I. Olatunji
Lagos City Polytechnic (Nigeria)
The Glass Ceiling Conundrum: Illusory belief or Barriers that
impede Women’s Career Advancement in the Workplace
Abstract
Given the preponderance of women in the workforce, it remained a puzzle why the entry of women into
higher managerial positions remains restricted and why the syndrome of ‘think manager think male is
growing progressively? The objective of this paper is to examine the glass ceiling conundrum with a
view of ascertain how it limits women’s career advancement in the workplace. Extensive review of
literature was presented and discussed. The paper revealed that women are not making it to the very top
of their career not as a result of lack of requisite qualifications, and experience etc.; but as a result of
factors that are rooted in cultural, societal, organizational, individual and psychological factors that
inhibit women career advancement. Against the aforementioned background, the paper concludes that
women advance marginally to certain level in corporate executive cadre, before they experience ‘glass
ceiling’ that impedes their prospect of attaining senior executive position. Accordingly, women
compared to men represent an insignificant fraction of those in managerial positions due to cultural
prejudice, religion convictions, family related issues, individual and organizational influences.
Similarly, inadequate opportunity to networks and seek sponsorship limits women progression to top
managerial hierarchy. The study recommends the need to articulate policy frameworks that promote
strong organizational culture and a more helpful and supportive environment to develop women
leadership skills. Similarly, there is need to promote sponsorship for women in a way and manner that
safeguard the relationships between sponsors and protégés.
Keywords: Glass Ceiling; Women Executives; Gender; Career Advancement; Work Life Balance;
Discrimination
Corresponding author: e-mail: abdulrahimajao@yahoo.com
Received 10 August 2016 - Accepted 08 March 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No
Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-comercial re-use and
distribution, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered or transformed in any way.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
138
Introduction
Despite the progress recorded with the formation of numerous women’s movements and
amendment to employment polices aiming at strengthening gender equality, women are still
struggling to have remarkable representation in top managerial positions (Davidson and Burke,
2012). Obstacles to secure top managerial positions are a global phenomenon where women,
compared to men, are extremely concentrated in lower-level and lower-cadre leadership
positions (Mohammadkhani and Dariush 2016). According to the report released by The
American Association of University Women- AAUW (2016), women have recorded significant
improvement in labor participation and some headway in executive positions, but there is stark
disparity in women representation in corporate leadership position not only in business, but
across unions, religious bodies, academia, the legal occupation and many other institutions.
Glass ceiling (GC) is a phenomenon that portrays the relative disadvantage regarding career
opportunities for women, revealing dilemmas that women experience when reaching advance
stage of their career (Kolade and Kehinde 2013; Jasielska 2014). Hence, this situation is defined
as “ceiling” because there are obstacles in the upward progress and “glass” (apparent) because
the restriction is not openly observable and is commonly a workplace ethos that is not formerly
written (Hiau 2008). Indeed, the obstacles to women career reveal discrimination and a border
line that demarcate how women career progresses compare to their male counterpart. According
to Powell and Butterfield (2003), glass ceiling is a form of barrier in the workplace that is so
subtle and apparent, yet so tough that it proscribed women and minorities from occupying top
position in management hierarchy. In contrast, to recognized barriers to career progression such
as inadequate education and lack of requisite work experience, the glass ceiling barriers are less
tangible and may be rooted in culture, society, organizational, individual and psychological
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
139
factors that work collectively to obstruct the progression of women to managerial positions
(Jain and Mukherji 2010). According to Morgan (2015), the glass ceiling obstacles can be
categorized into artificial and natural barriers. In her opinion, artificial barriers can best be
comprehended by contrasting with what might be called “natural” barriers founded on
educations or career breaks which influenced career progression.
Literally, the representation of the “glass ceiling” suggests the reality of an impervious obstacle
that blocks the vertical mobility of women as they rise through corporate ladder (Eagly and
Carli 2007). As observed by Morrison, White, and Von-Velsor (1987), the glass ceiling is an
obvious hiccup that prevents women from rising beyond certain echelons, simply because they
are women. Ridgeway (2001) states that irrespective of the exact mechanism promoting glass
ceiling, the phenomenon portray the relative disadvantages women face in securing jobs and
promotions in the upper levels of managerial hierarchies. The invisible barriers confronted by
women folks, according to Baxter and Erik (2000) are not peculiar to the top cadre position, but
also in middle-level management and minorities (people of race, color, and disabilities; etc.).
A report released by International Labor Organization-ILO revealed that between 1995 and
2015, female labor force participation rate diminished from 52.4% to 49.6 % worldwide. The
corresponding figures for men according to the report are 79.9% and 76.1%, respectively. Thus,
women’s lesser participation proportions result into declining employment opportunities, with
little difference over time, which depressingly upsets women’s earning capacity and economic
security, thus, women continue to be overrepresented in informal sector and family workers
(ILO 2015). As expressed by Meyerson and Fletcher (2000), women at the highest levels of
corporate cadres are still rare and very few occupy the uppermost echelons of power. For
instance, two-thirds of managerial-rank women at Fortune 1000 firms cluster were below the
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
140
top two steps of leadership levels (Constance, Dawn, and Paul 2006). According to Catalyst
(2015), men are much likely than women to be considered for leadership position. Their report
further revealed that only five percent of the businesses in the Standard and Poor’s 500 index
had women Chief Executive Officers in 2015. Statistics released by the Equal Opportunity for
Women in the Workplace Agency, revealed that only two of the top 200 enterprises are directed
by women, and only four have women Chief Executives (Hiau 2005).
Similarly, available data in developing country like Nigeria reveals a high degree of discrepancy
in levels of gender at top management positions. For illustration, in the Nigerian Federal Civil
Service, which is the leading employer of labor in the country, 76% of civil servants are men,
and 24% are women with women holding less than 14% of the total management level positions
in the Nigerian public sector (Goldstar Directories 2007). Similar accounts is reported in Lagos
state, which is the Nigeria’s largest commercial hub; private sector participation of women as
directors and top management were 13.87% and 13.84% respectively in 2005, while 8.14% and
13.11% were recorded for women directors and top managers respectively in 2006, signifying
further decline in their representation (Goldstar Directories 2007).
Discrimination in any form is prohibited in the workplace. Yet, discrimination exists in varying
nature and dimensions towards women career progression. While there has been some
improvement, much remains unchanged. Therefore, advancement of women career continues
to be a challenge due to poor organizational support, bias corporate policies and practices,
inadequate training opportunities to develop their capabilities, absence of role models and
counselors, and cultural beliefs and rules (Kunze 2008). As a result, women required different
kind of support to break the glass ceiling that scholars like Lombardo and Meier (2006) and
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
141
Hassim (2009) claimed might be accompanied by unconventional, unpleasant and unanticipated
consequences.
Researchers have presented a multiplicity of theories to explain the occurrence of the glass
ceiling phenomenon in the workplace. Nonetheless, the conundrum behind this influence is still
largely diverse and growing in intensity (George 2003). Although in contrast to what was
obtainable some decades back, career women are now building networks that will aid their
career progression; however, there is still prevaricated assessment of leadership behavior and
capabilities of women (Davidson and Burke 2012). In other words, the myopic conviction that
men are well-matched for leadership position seems difficult to challenge (Mordi et al. 2010).
The “gentleman’s club” promoted by glass ceiling constitute double jeopardy for women; given
the fact that women participation in labor market is disproportionate in favor of men, and the
few that are employed and possess the requisite qualifications and experience represent a tiny
fraction of those in managerial positions (ILO 2015). The erroneous notion that corporate
organizations are gender unbiased and ignorance of discrimination in the workplace has further
created difficulty in minimizing the obstacles associated with glass ceiling (Kantor 1977). As
observes by Adler (1993), corporate organizations have structure and policies that support male
socialization, which portrays that they are primarily created and dominated by men.
Consequently, men appear to have more disposition and arsenal for organizational politics than
women (Kantor 1977).
To date, the glass ceiling constitute a topical challenge and there is abundant evidence that labor
market discrimination against women persists, although it is difficult to conclude accurately
how much of the disparity in men/women pay and career progression is due to discrimination
and how much is connected to differences in choices or preferences between women and men
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
142
(Morgan 2015). One of the main reasons for the aforementioned challenges is that it is difficult
to connect glass ceiling conundrum to one domain of knowledge; and more worrisome is the
scanty nature of systematic review of literature related to glass ceiling phenomenon (Saul, Ute,
and Suncica 2014). Besides, some of these previous studies are patchy and inadequate to build
a comprehensive understanding of the glass ceiling and its associated consequences (Jerlando
and O’Challagham 2009). As a result, there is need for concerted effort to integrate the existing
literature with a view of realigning and crystalizing the operationalization and manifestation of
glass ceiling in the workplace. Against the above presentation, the objective of this paper is an
attempt to provide a review of the glass ceiling phenomenon as a deceptive belief or oppressive
tendency that restricts women’s career advancement in the workplace. Specific objectives of
this paper are to: (1) evaluate the level of women representation in top managerial hierarchy,
(2) identify the barriers that inhibit women career advancement, (3) determine how work-life
balance hinders the career prospects of women, (4) examine how old boys’ network create
discriminatory views for women in the workplace, and (5) assess difference in the level and
form of sponsorship for women compared to their male counterparts in the workplace. To
achieve the aforementioned research objectives, the paper attempts to answer the following
research questions:
1. What is the level of women representation in top managerial hierarchy?
2. What are the barriers that inhibit women career advancement?
3. How does work-life balance hinder the career prospects of women?
4. What is the role of old boys’ network in creating discriminatory views for women in the
workplace?
5. To what extent do the level and forms of sponsorship for women differ from their male
counterparts?
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
143
Theoretical and literature review
The role congruity theory
The role congruity theory has its origins in social role theory which describes the dissimilar
social positions of men and women and how it creates differing gender roles (Eagly, Wood, and
Diekman 2000). The role congruity theory was developed by Eagly and Karau (2002) to provide
a theoretical foundation toward a better understanding of the dynamics and diverse assessments
of women and men in managerial positions. The role congruity theory explains the undesirable
appraisals of female executives arising from perceived incongruity between managerial role
and feminine character attributed to women (Eagly and Karau 2002). Essentially, role congruity
theory is founded on the notion that the impetus to accomplish role congruity is an important
element in leadership effectiveness. On this note, women may be subjected to some form of
stereotypes that contribute to their under-representation in managerial positions, which may
further aggravate how female gender roles are observed as incongruent with the requirements
needed for successful leadership (Eagly and Karau 2002). These scholars further maintained
that since managerial position has been fundamentally view as male right, there might be
perceived incompatibility between the feminine gender roles and leadership roles.
Accordingly, role congruity theory describes how stereotypes and agentic and communal
individualities interact to influence women's accomplishment in the work place. Agentic
characters refer to some features more frequently attributed to males, which encompasses - self-
confident, controlling, and assertive form of behavior (Eagly and Johannesen-Schmidt 2001).
Communal traits on the other hand, consist of characteristics more commonly credited to
females, such as interpersonally sensitive and nurturing form of behavior (Eagly and
Johannessen-Schmidt 2001). According to this theory, women are perceived less suitable to
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
144
occupy executive positions in organizations compared to men because they lack requisite
behavioral characteristics such as articulate and authoritarian tendency required by leaders
(Eagly and Karau 2002). Hence, preference is given to men because it is assumed that men are
better managers than women; hence the syndrome of ‘think manager think male (Schein 2007).
Social role and identity theory
One of the foremost explanations attributed to the ‘glass ceiling conundrum’ is the ‘social role
theory’ formerly suggested by Eagly in 1987. Accordingly, social role and identity theory
suggests that men and women act according to the social roles (e.g. class, gender and race)
ascribed to them and which are dictated by the way their genders are stereotyped. According to
Eagly (1987), this theory was coined from the division of labor ideologies which echoes a
biosocial interaction between male and female physical attributes and social configuration.
According to this scholar, social role theory acknowledges that both men and women occupy
numerous social roles (i.e. organizational role) which can surpass gender specific roles
contingent on the situation. For instance, women are associated with characters such as caring,
compassion and attention in their relationships with others (Fondas 1997; Rahim, Dixxon-
Ogbechi, and Ighomereho 2013). Although these comportments are not typical of a corporate
board room, it does not mean that they cannot be beneficial to the organization (Daily, Dalton,
and Albert 2003). In contrast to women, men are perceived as more competitive, autonomous
and independent in nature (Rudman and Glick 2001). The aforementioned traits are to some
extent the anticipated norms in corporate organization. Thus, the notion of social identity theory
in this context explains a deeper motive as to why women to some extent are being under-
represented in leadership position (Singh and Vinnicombe 2004). Accordingly, while men
seeking promotion to managerial level simply exhibit appropriate desired behaviors, women
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
145
must ‘first break that passive image of women holding diminutive power in a male-dominated
domain’ which can be remarkably challenging if the organization is lacking female role-models
and organizational support (Eagly 2009).
An overview of the glass ceiling (GC)
Glass ceiling was initially described as a perception or experience of women in the domain of
business. The first writer to use the metaphor glass ceiling” was Marilyn Loden in 1978 and it
was later popularized at a Conference of the Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press led by
Katherine Lawrence in July 1979 (Fernandez 2011; BusinessNews Publishing 2013). The
conventional use of the word “glass ceiling,” according to the Oxford English Dictionary and
most of the conserved narratives on and off the web is illustrated in a remark in the American
Magazine World/Adweek in 1984 (Morgan 2015). A much more recent account of glass ceiling
phenomenon originated in a Wall Street Journal report on corporate women by Hymowitz and
Schellhardt in 1986. Essentially, glass ceiling connote a barriers encountered by women who
endeavor, or desire, to occupy senior positions (as well as higher salary ranks) in establishments
such as corporate organizations, government entity, and nonprofit organizations among others
(McCarthy and Burns 2013).
In general, women’s under-representation in top leadership position has been regarded as a
barrier that is holding women back from attaining managerial position in the workplace.
Women in the executive position may also experience the metaphors like “glass elevators” and
“glass cliffs” which represent greater scrutiny and condemnation (Ryan and Haslam 2005).
Further expression such as “sticky floors” was coined by Catherine Berheide’s in 1992 to
describe the circumstances where women and men having almost equal capabilities are
employed to the same level or positions; but more often than not, appointment of the women is
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
146
prevalent at the lower hierarchy and men are promoted to higher level (Erik and Marita 2006).
Descriptions such as “perspex ceiling,” “sticky cobweb,” “labyrinth” and “greasy pole” among
others have also been operationalized to represent glass ceiling phenomenon in gender and
diversity management literature. However, irrespective of the metaphor adapted to describe
glass ceiling, one thing that is common to glass ceiling representation is that women
opportunities to progress along their career path disappear at various points along the route of
their career development.
According to Ying et al. (2011), three key restrictions fuel glass-ceiling occurrence: customary
gender roles, expressions of sexism in the workplace, and lack of sponsorships. Janeen and Erik
(2000) maintain that two things must prevail to demonstrate and prove the existence of glass
ceiling: (1) the proportion of women compared to men being promoted into or entering a given
cadre of management drops as they move up the managerial hierarchy and (2) that this decline
in comparative progression will likely decline further and deepened the hurdles of women
promotion as opposed to some other factors. Kantor (1977) noted that a number project based
studies on glass ceiling were founded on a faulty analysis. For instance, those who presumed
that the elements creating inequalities in workplace are some how conceded in the individual
are relying on the wrong model to draw erroneous conclusions. Such level of analysis according
to her, anticipated that such disparities were due to either nature or nurture: that’s women were
not the same as men by nature (so they were not so struggling or competitive), or women were
fostered in a different way from men (hence, they are constrained not to be competitive or
occupy positions of leadership).
Eagly and Carli (2007) further contended the exactness of the “glass ceiling,” and argued that
it suggests systematic upward movement that is then obscenely thwarted by an ambiguous
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
147
hurdle that obstructs further progression. These scholars further posit that, GC is not one ceiling
or partition in one spot, but rather numerous and ubiquitous forms of gender prejudice that are
multifaceted and occur in both obvious and hidden ways. Wright (1997) observes that the
“glass ceiling” appears to be established by casual observation, because it does not require
logical research to notice that a much higher proportion of bottom supervisors other than Chief
Executive Officers are women. According to Rai and Srivastava (2008), glass ceiling is a
relative term; hence, it does not exists, because women receive lower salaries due to career
disruption, worked for lesser time and engaged in low-risk jobs. David et al. (2001) contend
that if glass ceiling is proposed purely as a gender or any other form of inequalities, then
researchers and advocacy of gender equality are merely promoting the concept to simplify
communication in the public domain, which do little or no impact on effort to determine the
root causes of inequality.
Perspectives on glass ceiling barriers
Women have occupied leadership positions both in business and other field of human
endeavors. Nevertheless, in almost all situations, male leaders significantly outnumber female
and the latter have made very few inroads into senior managerial positions (Ann et al. 2015).
Barriers in the workplace can be viewed from two distinct perspectives: formal versus informal
barriers, where formal denotes biased government policy or rules, and informal about cognitive
and cultural barriers. Barreto, Michelle, and Micheal (2009) posit that the notion of glass ceiling
is a symbolic obstacle which can be detached from formal or legitimate barriers to career
advancement such as level of education or work experience. According to Fagenson (1990),
women’s progression to leadership position can be influenced by the individual factors within
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
148
the person, organizational factors which are situated within the organization, and societal and
systemic factors.
In some settings, particularly patriarchal societies, there are arrangements controlling the roles
of women, making the under-representation of women in executive positions acceptable norms
(Kulkarni 2002). In general, traditions and laws against female leadership can be found
throughout human history, most remarkably in every major religion (Christ 2014). For instance,
right from the childhood, women are compelled to obey some social rubrics which are firmly
enrooted in their mind and as such they find it difficult to ignore the influence of those rules
when they matured (Kulkarni 2002). These traditional and cultural inhibitions according to the
scholar are further fostered by parents and duly strengthened by socialization. Correspondingly,
society has consciously upheld the convention that a woman’s ideal place is at home (Jacobs
1992) and this has promoted some practices that exceptionally violate their constitutional rights.
For instance, in some tribal/ethnic group in Nigeria women need to contend with many
oppressive and discriminatory cultural practices such as: right of women to inheritance,
marriage dissolution, widowhood practices, and Son-preference syndrome among others
(Babatunde 2014; Ifemeje and Umejiaku 2014).
Likewise, barriers from the family tend to be more multifaceted and exert serious interruption
on women’s career paths than those of men which are characteristically trajectory, and this
obstructs women’s progression to top leadership positions (Cansu 2013). As observed Spector
et al. (2004), family related complication and glass ceiling hurdles in the workplace could also
be linked to culture. For instance, in Anglo based cultures, research has shown that elongated
working hours is not connected to work-family stress and productivity. Possible reason for this
could be that in these cultures, dual income families and partners are more supportive of each
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
149
other’s career ambitions. In contrast, in Western culture, ‘male breadwinner’ notion is still
common, relegating the significance of a wife’s career. Accordingly, these forms of conception
and associated demands create difficulty for career advancement of women and the degree of
their career growth. Notably, women often have to deal with the complications of the numerous
roles played by them in the family and at work and in many instances they have to make
sacrifices, prioritizing family demand over work life which further slows down their careers
progression (Sarika 2015).
According to Siew and Geraint (2012), institutional barriers have also been documented to
propel occupational segregation (i.e. gender-based employment discrimination) which works
against the interest of women. According to these scholars, the discrimination may arise from
horizontal or vertical dimensions. The horizontal discrimination echoes the fact that men and
women are assigned differently across occupations while vertical segregation defines how men
and women work in different status of occupations (Siew and Geraint 2012). As observed by
the European Commission’s Expert Group on Gender and Employment-EGGE (2009),
horizontal discrimination is based on under-(over) representation of a given group in
occupations or a sector, not founded on any criterion, and is often denoted to as segregation
tout court. Vertical segregation on the other, represents the under (over) representation of a
noticeably recognize group of employees in a particular jobs or industry at the topmost based
on ‘desirable’ characteristics such as income, prestige, job stability etc., independently of the
sector or activity. Anne and Elke (2011) maintained that vertical segregation indicates the
presence of observable or obscure hindrances that lead to certain fewness of women in top rank
positions in organization.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
150
As regard individual barriers, a number of psycho-social attributes, such as self-esteem, self -
efficacy, assertiveness, emotional stability, sense of perceived control, optimism and inclination
towards social relationship are somewhat weakly exhibited by women’s due to some of the
aforementioned reasons (Sarika 2015). The research carried out by Wirth (2001) added to the
debate surrounding glass ceiling conundrum. He reported that the “dissimilar career desires” of
women prompt them to create a self-inflicted glass ceiling, deceptively considering that a glass
ceiling would hinder their careers. For instance, women exert struggle to maintain balance
between her motherhood and her career progression (Koshal, Koshal, and Gupta 2006). In
addition, effective management control/rewards system, boldness, aggressiveness and
autonomy, have largely been acknowledged as “masculine” personality (Sarmistha, Arnab, and
Sovonjit 2014). In addition, the challenges to the barrier women’s experience are further
complemented by lack of self-direction, independence of mind and poor self-motivation
(Kulkarni 2002). Remarkably, it has also been reported than most women are less ambitious
and this hinders their opportunity to climb the career ladder (Ann et al. 2010). Although the
impression that women are not concerned about their elevation to high managerial positions
due to the challenges of work life balance has been widely criticized (Cansu 2013).
Accoding to Morgan (2015), organizational barriers stimulated the structure beyond a single or
primary dependence upon individuals and their work relations (the “attitudinal” components)
towards organizational, systemic, or obstructions within which individuals acted. For instance,
in many corporate organizations, gender stereotyping is very pervasive and this has become a
kind of structural norms which further encourage double standard in term of administrative
policy and rules that encourage glass ceiling. As a result, men in positions of authority are
hesitant to recommend women to top managerial position for fear of their emotions, and the
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
151
perceived idea that they will often take time off job to cater for their family (Sarmistha, Arnab,
and Sovonjit 2014). Ironically, in a situation a woman is exceptionally self-confident and stands
out as a potential leader, the prevailing masculine corporate culture is yet another obstacle for
their career growth (Eagly and Carli 2007). Likewise, men in position of authority feel
threatened when there is a strong independent minded woman executive in the board room and
they often try to heckle intentionally and create barriers in several form to prevent their upward
mobility in the organization (Sarika 2015).
The glass ceiling conundrum and sponsorship effects
Desire for career progression and success for both men and women is a fact of life. Simply,
because everybody wants to see their capabilities and skills recognized and rewarded.
Therefore, in accomplishing meaningful career life, building sponsorship has become
something of a struggle that promotes powerful coalitions across corporate ladder. A study
conducted by Ann et al. (2010) revealed that among the numerous paths to authority,
sponsorship is underestimatedand thus, underutilizedby both men and women. According
to their study, relatively, men are reaping the benefits of the old-boy networks, but women need
to avail themselves of every benefit, every alternative pathway to the top echelons of power
through improves sponsorship. Ann et al. (2010) further observe that women’s lack of
enthusiasm to actively seek sponsorship is amply justified. According to them, the deeper the
ally of women to senior executive becomes the more the speculation that the relationship is
more than professional.
In recent times, academics and business practitioners have focused on sponsorship, as a form
of mentorship in which sponsors acquired both status and opportunity. However, a sponsor is
not to be mixed up with a mentor. Although a leader can be both a mentor and a sponsor,
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
152
however, the roles are distinctive (Ann et al. 2010). A sponsor in the opinion of these authors
sticks their neck out visibly towards their protégée performance and career progression. In
contrast, they declare that it is possible to mentor and coach someone who is unpleasant without
risking ones reputation, because mentorship can be done behind the scene. According to Ann
et al. (2010), the dynamic force in a mentorship lies with the mentee, whereas in sponsorship,
it is the sponsor who guides and energies the relationship.
In recognizing the difficulties generated by the glass ceiling, women have to realize that in order
to crack it, they need to advocate and support each other in advancement efforts. Ironically, it
is disheartening to find out that women feel threatened by their women counterpart and more
often they are the major critics and impediments to other women (Jones 2014). This scenario is
referred to as “queen bee syndrome” in management literature relating to what women
experience while struggling to advance their career in the workplace. According to Wrigley
(2002) and Drexler (2013), women in managerial positions tries to sabotage those in lower
levels and are unenthusiastic in supporting and assisting other women in lower levels to
progress to leadership position. Also, given the disparity of women at the top echelon in the
executive positions in the organization, it is equally possible that fewer women executives that
make it to the top will join hands with the men to sabotage other female employees in junior
cadre of the organizations to engage in severe criticisms that will project them as bad candidates
for management position on the ground of envy and to promote the interest of men’s club. Jones
(2014) further remarks that women also experience confidence problem after securing
leadership position. According to him, after fighting arduous battle of career progression for so
long, they became battle scares; women tend to be self-condemn, instead of showing confidence
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
153
and appearing assertive. Hence, their inability to fully integrate into board room politics and
challenge the status quo of old-boy networks (Jones 2014).
Gender characters and work life balance as a contributing factors to glass ceiling in the
workplace
According to Williams (2000), men get preferential treatment whether they are in the majority
or minority, while women are disfavored, particularly, if they are in the minority, and
occasionally even when they belong to the majority. Working women aside from their job
career manage home affairs, which exemplifies a vital and associated social change (Kirkton
and Greene 2000). More worrisome is the fact that even if a female executive struggle and
break the glass ceiling, often time they find themselves trapped in a secondary form of glass
ceiling “glass cliff”, which is more precarious (Douglas and Porcher 2012). In other words,
women executive experience a gendered dual dilemma, for instance, if women’s is excessively
self-confident and masculine she may be perceived as competent but not friendly and if her
behavior is too womanly, she may be seen as pleasant but inept (Eagly and Carli 2007).
Furthermore, women that managed to shatter the glass ceiling are subjected to intense scrutiny
than men and must overcome a complex tavern on a number of other issues such as sexual
harassment, being labeled as arrogant and unsociable etc. (Heilman et al. 1998). For instance,
women must exhibit “executive posture” in their dress and manner, and if they go awry, is an
opportunity to label them with bad names that may disqualify them for executive positions.
Similarly, women must navigate ordeal of unexpressed verdicts with regard to their personal
life to climb managerial positions, and may be compelled to acquire male attitudes to scale
through the hurdles (Eagly and Carli 2007). In addition, instances abound in some organizations
that prevented women from getting married or pregnant for some period of years and when this
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
154
is violated they are dismissed from their jobs but the men who impregnated them keep their
jobs. In other words, there’s a sharp difference in what men sacrifice compares to what women
give up to whither the challenges associated with their career progression (Babatunde 2012).
Arguably, work-life balance is imperative in accomplishing a flourishing career, hence, with
enlarge responsibilities in the work place, the boundary between work life and private life
require additional realization (Fapohunda 2014). According to Clark (2000), work life balance
is the level of fulfillment and well-meaning functioning at work and at home, with the smallest
level of role conflict. As observes by Fapohunda (2014), employee that experience happy home
tend to experience pleasant work life; on the contrary, where employees are unable to properly
balance work and family life, they tend to find it difficult to manage tasks at the workplace and
this subsequently shrinks productivity. The popular phrase in management literature “Do we
live to work or we work to live? Has succinctly captured the concern and value of how and
what individual place on work and home (or family) and the two domains represent the most
important aspects in the life of a working individual (Greenhaus, Collins, and Shaw 2003).
For women employees the day is not over when they close from office, because another set of
work starts at home. This is the reality most married women unavoidably assumed when they
get home. Perhaps, nature and cultural belief has bestowed on them the role of a wife and a
mother. Hence, the challenges of balancing work and family for women is particularly
challenging and will continue to be a fundamental concern for both individuals and
organizations (Valcour 2007). Remarkably, work-life balance challenges can influence
women’s advancement and, if not proactively handled may trigger glass-ceiling phenomenon.
Generally, women are the prime family caregivers for children and/or the aged, which further
handicapped many to make move that would increase the prospect of progressing up the
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
155
corporate hierarchy. Similarly, prospects for promotion often place men at advantage due to
evolving privilege, arising from mentoring and networking; which their women counterparts
may not have the benefit to build, thus, contributing to gender obstacles in the workplace (Ann
et al. 2010).
Discussion
It is becoming a usual convention to ascribe the position of Chief Executive Officer or
Managing Director to male, not female, because the position is male dominated. Similarly, it
has become a recurring phenomenon, that women are able to progress marginally in corporate
leadership ladder, before stumbling on a ‘glass ceiling’ that inhibits or decreases their prospect
of reaching top executive status. In some sector, the phenomenon of glass ceiling is made of
something much tougher to crack, hence, instead of breaking the glass ceiling; women have
only succeeded to chip away at its surface. While the causes of glass ceiling are questionable,
its impacts are very feasible and undeniable and the biases experience by women is readily
obvious, however, the mechanisms underlying these prejudices remain impervious. This paper
reveals that despite some promising improvements, gender inequality remains in the workplace
and increasing gender equality in educational and work experience attainment does not stop
women from being concentrated in middle to lower-paid occupations that echo traditional
gender stereotypes and opinions about women’s and men’s ambitions and capabilities (ILO
2015). The reality is that in theory, nothing stops women from rising to the top position in their
chosen career as men do. However, in practice there exist obscure barriers through which the
advancement of women to top rank position is restricted.
Across the globe, discrimination in any form in the workplace is prohibited, yet it exists in
numerous facets such as inequitable earning, recruitment practices, and promotional
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
156
opportunities among others which are mostly in favor of men for comparable positions in
similar establishments. The glass ceiling conundrum is manifested in various ways: such as
cultural and family induced issues (i.e., gender roles ethnicity, work life balance, and religious
discrimination in the workplace). Glass ceiling has also been observed to emanate from
individual factors such as subjective personal obstacles - passion for long term goal, pessimistic
view, perseverance, degree of life satisfaction, and unpleasant affect among others (Powell and
Butterfield 2003). Correspondingly, numerous organizational induced factors have also been
documented to obstruct the progression of women to senior positions such as lack of family-
friendly workplace policies (Acker 2006), human capital obstacles (lower educational
qualification, access to financial resources, and cognate experience); marginalization from
informal networks; weak sponsorship, inadequate management support for work/life programs;
absence of mentors and role-models; and attitudinal and organizational prejudices (Bombuwela
and De Alwis 2013).
More importantly, women also experience some form of role conflict between work and family
demand which further affect their productivity and consideration for top managerial positions.
In particular, research has revealed that one of the major dissimilarities between men and
women are their capabilities to network. For instance, sponsor opportunity is more readily and
easily accessible by men compare to women. Ann et al. (2010) claimed that women progression
to management position remain far outnumbered by male executives because they lack the
influential sponsorship required to motivate, drive, and safeguard them through the terrifying
channels of what is require to occupy leadership position. Besides, even if women executives
possess requisite qualification, competence, and zeal to progress in their careers, very few lucky
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
157
ones attain the same status as their male counterparts, for the sake of the so-called ‘glass ceiling’
(Eagly and Carli 2002).
Conclusion and implications
This paper reviews the glass ceiling conundrum as a form of oppressive tendency that limits
women’s career advancement in the workplace. From a rational point of view, women have the
skills and competence to lead; the missing link is perhaps the inadequacy of the needed support
to encourage, drive, and safeguard them through the terrifying canals of leadership position.
Put differently, it is not that women completely lack the knowledge and capability to progress
to upper management levels, but at some point they are prevented by invisible barriers that
block them from rising further to top executive cadre. This suggests that the impediments
women experience compare to men steadily increase as they move up to the top hierarchy due
to cultural bias, religion sentiment, individual and organizational factors. It has also been widely
admitted that the traditional male-controlled policy and practices are slow to adjust to
contemporary realities and may transpire slowly (Bramham 1991); consequently, progressive
societal and organizational reorientation are critical to challenge the prevailing beliefs, ethos,
and authority relationships to change perceived male dominance in the workplace. For that
reason, it appears necessary to advance exceptional campaigns action to increase women’s
representation in top echelon of organization. Likewise, most firms have been hooked to the
generalized sense of the dictum of the traditional roles of women (house wife), which further
aggravates discrimination of women in the workplace. Furthermore, the struggle that women
confront to advance to the top of their career cannot be entirely attributed neither to male
conspiracy nor domestic responsibilities, but inadequate support and poor advocacy.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
158
This paper identified specific behaviors and workplace practices that fuel glass ceiling at work
and it has offered ample evidences that revealed how female employees are discriminated
against in the workplace. In particular, the authors noted that inequality between men and
women continues in global labor markets, in respect of opportunities, behavior and
consequences. Furthermore, the paper offer a depiction of where women stand today and how
they have advanced in the domain of work and more importantly the root causes of disparities
and how they should be addressed based on what is feasible and sustainable. The impending
factors that propelled discrimination in the workplace need to be address by ensuring on one
hand, strict compliance of corporate organization to the contemporary human resource
management policy and practices and on the other hand, there is need to advocate and propelled
the needed strategies that will advance women progression in the workplace.
Recommendations
This paper offers the following recommendations.
1. Women’s under-representation in executive position will not upsurge significantly without
major changes in the culture, policies, and practices of the organizations where women learn
and work. Therefore, there is need to endorsed policy framework that promote strong
organizational culture that create a more helpful and supportive environment, adaptive
workplace policies, and practices, and capacity building to develop women confidence level
required for occupying top executive positions.
2. The notion of glass ceiling needs to be approached with fairness and equity in ensuring that
individuals that bring the same capabilities to work (qualifications, knowledge and
abilities), or accomplish the same task(s), get the same opportunity to advance their career
regardless of gender, race or any other prejudice factors. This will provide avenue for
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
159
women to move from the sidelines to the mainstream of executive cadres, and by extension
their willingness to collaborate and offers their best to organizational growth.
3. Likewise, effort should be made to communicate and emphasis continuing obligation to
workforce diversity throughout the organization with a view of removing artificial barriers
at every level so as to promote feminist-based organizational transformation which is the
latest management fad of advocating gender equity, ethical behavior and
friendly/supportive organizational climate.
4. Although numerous descriptions have been advanced about what obstructs women career
advancement in the workplace; in adequate sponsorship is one of the most prevalent factors
that inhibit women from attaining top leadership positions. Therefore, there is need to make
one-on-one relationships between sponsors and protégés “secure” and “transparent” to
safeguard sponsorship opportunity for women competing for executive positions. The
approach may also include promoting policy that sanctions mentors if their mentees are not
promoted to the board within a certain period of time.
Limitations and suggestion for further studies
The major drawbacks associated with this paper is the adoption of literature review approach
which raises the likelihood of accommodating similar research paradigms or views of the
previous studies that were not empirically validated and may reflect a common methodology
bias. Nonetheless, the adoption of survey approach (through questionnaire) has been
documented to be inadequate for measuring phenomenon such as glass ceiling
(Mohammadkhani and Dariush 2016). However, there is an important gap that needs to be
filled, which requires further research attention. Such research inquiry could adopt qualitative
research approach specifically ‘face to face interview’ to unravel and deepen research effort
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
160
aiming at identifying the various forms of barriers women encounter in the workplace, and how
to proffer solution to the menace of glass ceiling in the workplace. Also, given the prominence
of glass ceiling in the workplace, there is potential for future research into why significant
improvement of women into top managerial position remains a mirage. Therefore, an important
research inquiry is to investigate glass ceiling from a broader point of view that encompasses
the opinion of government, community leaders’, religious leaders, and internal customers
among others. Obviously, different strata of the society will have different opinions and it is
natural such diverse approach will offer diverse points of view that could provide useful insights
as well as offering a more realistic approach to strengthen women representation in top
management position and to ensure their full capacity development.
References
Acker, Joan. 2006. “Inequality regimes, gender, class, and race in organizations.” Gender and Society
20: 441-464.
Adler, Nancy J. 1993. “Cross cultural management: Issues to be faced.” International Studies of
Management and Organization 13 (1/2): 7-45.
Babatunde, Akanji. 2012. “Realities of work life balance in Nigeria: Perceptions of role conflict and
coping beliefs.” Journal of Human and Society 10 (2): 248-263.
Babatunde, Akanji O. 2014. Discriminatory property inheritance rights under the Yoruba and Igbo
customary law in Nigeria: The need for reforms.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science
19 (2): 30-43.
Barreto, Manuella D., Michelle Ryan K., and Micheal Shemitt T. 2009. The glass ceiling in the 21st
century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Baxter, Janeen, and Erik Wright O. 2000. “The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the
United States, Sweden, and Australia.” Gender and Society 14 (2): 275294.
Bombuwela, Pon M., and De Alwis Chamaru A. 2013. “Effects of glass ceiling on Women career
development in private sector organizations - Case of Sri Lanka.” Journal of Competitiveness 5:3-
19.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
161
Bosse, Douglas, A., and Pocher Taylor III L. 2012. “The second glass ceiling that impede women
entrepreneurs.” The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship 17 (1): 52-68.
Bramham, Peter. 1991. “Explanations of the organization of sport in British society.” International
Review for the Sociology of Sport 26:139153.
Busch, Anne, and Elke Holst. 2011. Gender-specific occupational segregation, glass ceiling effects,
and earnings in managerial positions: Results of a fixed effects model. IZA DP No. 5448
January. Discussion Paper No. 5448 January 2011. Accessed January 23, 2017.
http://ftp.iza.org/dp5448.pdf
Cansu, Akpinar-Sposite. 2013. “The glass ceiling: Structural, cultural and organizational career barriers
for French and Turkish Women executives.” Paper presented at the Le 24_eme congress de
l'AGRH 2013, Paris, France.
Catalyst. 2015. Women CEOs of the S&P 500. Accessed January 18, 2016.
http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/ women-ceos-sp-500.
Christ, Carol P. 2014. “Do we still need the journal of feminist studies in religion?” Journal of Feminist
Studies in Religion 30 (2): 139141.
Clark, Sue C. 2000. “Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human
Relations 53 (6): 747770.
Constance, Helfat, Dawn Harris, and Paul Wolfson. 2006. “The pipeline to the top: Women and Men in
the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations.” Academy of Management Perspectives 20 (4): 42
64.
Cotter, David A., Jean Hermsen M., Seth Ovadia, and Reeve Vanneman. 2001. The glass ceiling
effect.” Social Forces 80 (2): 655-682.
Daily, Catherine, Dalton Pfeffer, and Albert S. Cannella. 2003. “Corporate governance: Decades of
dialogue and data.” Academy of Management Journal 28:371382.
Davidson, Marilyn J., and Burke J. Ronald. 2012. Women in management worldwide: Progress and
prospects. Farnham: Gower Publishing.
Drexler, Peggy. 2013. “The tyranny of the Queen Bee.” The Wall Street Journal 6 (6): 8. Accessed
January 18, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10
Eagly, Alice. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Eagly, Alice H. 2009. “The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology
of gender.” American Psychologist 64:644658.
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli Linda. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The truth about how women become
leader. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
162
Eagly, Alice H., and Johannesen-Schmidt Mary C. 2001. “The leadership styles of Women and Men.”
Journal of Social Issues 57:781-797.
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau Steven J. 2002. “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward Female leaders.”
Psychological Review 109 (3): 573- 598.
Eagly, Alice H., Wood Wendy, and Diekman Amanda B. 2000. “Social role theory of sex differences
and similarities: A current appraisal.” In The developmental social psychology of gender, edited
by Eckes, T. and Trautner H.M., 123174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Erik, Bihagen, and Marita Ohk. 2006. “The glass ceiling-Where is it? Women’s and Men’s career
prospects in the private vs. the public sector in Sweden 1979-2000.” The Sociological Review 54
(1): 20-47.
European Commission’s Expert Group on Gender and Employment-EGGE. 2009. Gender segregation
in the labour market root causes, implications and policy responses in the EU. Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European. Union, 2009. Accessed December 13, 2016.
httpt://www.ec.europa.eu/social
Fagenson, Ellen A. 1990. “At the heart of the Women in management research: Theoretical and
methodological approach and their biases.” Journal of Business Ethics 9:267-274.
Fapohunda, Tinuke M. 2014. “An exploration of the effects of work life balance on productivity.”
Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies 2 (2): 71-89.
Fernandez, Marilyn L. 2011. On feminine leadership. Pelican Bay Post, May.
Fondas, Nanette. 1997. “Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings.”
Academy of Management Review 22:257282.
Ganiyu, Rahim Ajao, Dixxon-Ogbechi Bolajoko N., and Salome Ighomereho O. 2013. “Gender and
relationship marketing in Nigerian securities and stock brokerage firms.” International journal of
Marketing Studies 5 (4): 72-81.
George, Dreher F. 2003. “Breaking the glass ceiling: The effects of sex ratios and work–life programs
on Female leadership at the top.” Human relations 56 (5): 541562.
Goldstar Directories. 2007. Nigeria’s top 500 companies. Lagos: National Directories Division of
Goldstar Group.
Greenhaus, Jeffrey H., Karen M. Collins, and Jason D. Shaw. 2003. “The relation between work-family
roles.” Academy of Management Review 10 (1): 76-88.
Gupta, Ashok, Manjulika Koshal, and Rajindar K. Koshal. 2006. “Women managers in India:
Challenges and opportunities.” In Management in India: Trends and transition, edited by Herbert
J. Davis, Samir R. Chatterjee, and Mark Heuer. New Delhi: Response Books.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
163
Hassim, Shireen. 2009. Rethinking gender politics in a liberal age: Institutions, constituencies and
equality in comparative perspective, UNRISD. Accessed March 23, 2017. http://www.unrisd.org
Heilman, Madeline E., Block Caryn J., Martell Richard F., and Simon Micheal C. 1998. “Has anything
changed? Current characterizations of Men, Women and managers.” Journal of Applied
Psychology 74:935-942.
Hewlett, Ann, Kerrie Peraino, Laura Sherbin, and Karen Sumberg. 2010. “The sponsor effect: Breaking
through the last glass ceiling.” Center for Work-Life Policy, Harvard Business Review,
December.
Hiau, Kee J. 2008. “Glass ceiling or sticky floor: Exploring the Australian gender pay gap.” The
Economic Record 82 (59): 408-427.
Hiau, Kee J. 2005. “Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Exploring the Australian gender pay gap using quantile
regression and counterfactual decomposition methods.” Discussion Paper No. 487, The
Australian National University Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Hymowitz, Carol, and Timothy D. Schellhardt. 1986. “The glass-ceiling: Why Women can’t seems to
break the invisible barrier that blocks them from top jobs.” The Wall Street Journal, March 24.
Ifemeje, Sylvia C., and Umejiaku Nneka. 2014. “Discriminatory cultural practices and Women’s rights
among the Igbos of South-East Nigeria: A critique.” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization
25: 18-27.
International Labor Organization. 2015. Women at work trends 2016. Geneva: International Labor
Office. Accessed January 13, 2017. http://www.lopubs@ilo.org.
Jacobs, Jerry A. 1992. “Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values
among salaried managers.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (2): 282301.
Jain, Neera M., and Mukherji Shoma. 2010. “The perception of ‘glass ceiling’ in Indian organization:
An exploratory study.” South Asian Journal of Management 17 (1): 23-42.
Janeen, Baxter, and Erik Wright O. 2000. “The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the
United States, Sweden, and Australia.” Gender and Society 14 (2): 275-294.
Jasielska, Aleksandra. 2014. “Women career success in a Man work's place: A cross national study.”
Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology 5 (1): 23.
Jerlando, Jackson F.L., and Elizabeth M. O’Challagham. 2009. “What do we know about glass ceiling
effects? A taxonomy and critical review to inform higher education research.” Research High
Education 50:460482.
Jones, Beverly. 2014. “Boomer Women hit the glass ceiling. Four tips to crack it now.” Forbes.
Accessed January 13, 2017.om http://www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2014/10/10/boomer-
women-hit-the-glass-ceiling-four-tips-to-crack-it-now/.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
164
Kantor, Roseabeth M. 1977. Men and Women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kirkton, Gill, and Anne-Marie Greene. 2000. The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach.
Oxford: Butterworth Heineman.
Kolade, John O., and Kehinde Obasan. 2013. “Glass ceiling and women career advancement: Evidence
from Nigerian construction industry.” Iranian Journal of Management Studies 6 (6-1): 77-97.
Kunze, Astrid. 2008. “Gender wage gap studies: Consistency and decomposition.” Empirical Economics
35:63-76.
Kulkarni, S. Sushma. 2002. “Women and professional competency – A survey report.” Indian Journal
of Training and Development 32 (2): 1116.
Laermer, Richard and Michael Prichinello. 2013. Summary full frontal PR. Review and analysis of
Laermer and Prichinello's Book. Business News Publishing.
Lombardo, Emanuela, and Meier Petra. 2006. “Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a
feminist reading?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13:151-166.
McCarthy, Kelly, and Paula Burns. 2013. The double glass ceiling: An in-depth investigation and
analysis into the challenges faced by Women when seeking promotion to the boardroom and
beyond the executive suite. A BPP Business School Working Paper December. Accessed
January 13, 2017. http://www.Bpp.Com
Meyerson, Debra E., and Joyce K. Fletcher 2000. “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling.”
Harvard Business Review 1 (1): 127140.
Mohammadkhani, Fatemah, and Dariush Gholamzadeh. 2016. “The influence of leadership styles on
the Women’s glass ceiling beliefs.” Journal of Advanced Management Science 4 (4): 276-282.
Mordi, Chima, Ruth Simpson, Singh Satwinder, and Okafor Chinonye. 2010. “Motivation to be a
Female entrepreneur in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Gender in Management- An International Journal
25: 5-25.
Morgan, Mary S. 2015. “Glass ceilings and sticky floors: Drawing new ontologies.” Working Paper No.
228 (December). London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic
History.
Morrison, Ann M., White Ramdall P., and Von-Velsor Ellen. 1987. Breaking the glass ceiling: Can
Women reach the top of America’s largest corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Powell, Gray N., and Anthony D. Butterfield. 2003. “Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top
management.” Women in Management Review 18 (1/2): 88-96.
Rai, Usha K., and Monica Srivastava. 2008. “Women executives and the glass ceiling: Myths and
mysteries from Razia Sultana to Hillary Clinton.” BHU Management Review 1 (2):79.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. “Gender, status and leadership.” Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 637655.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
165
Rudman, Laurie A., and Peter Glick. 2001. “Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic
Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57:743-762.
Ryan, Michelle K., and Alexander S. Haslam. 2005. “The glass cliff: Evidence that Women are over-
represented in precarious leadership positions.” British Journal of Management 16:81-90.
Sarika, Seshadri G. 2015. “Breaking the glass ceiling: Initiatives of Indian industry: A study with special
reference to exemplary organizations.” The International Journal of Business and Management
3 (3): 255-260.
Sarmistha, Nandy, Arnab Bhaskar, and Sovonjit Ghosh. 2014. “Corporate glass ceiling: An impact on
Indian Women employees.” International Journal of Management and International Business
Studies 4 (2): 135-140.
Saul, Estrin, Stephan Ute, and Suncica Vujic. 2014. Do Women earn less even as social entrepreneurs?
Discussion Paper No. IZA DP No. 8650, 1-47. Institute for the Study of Labor, Germany.
Schein, Virginia E. 2007. “Women in management: Reflections and projection.” Women in Management
Review 22 (1): 6-18.
Siew, Ching, and Geraint Johnes. 2012. Revisiting the impact of occupational segregation on the gender
earnings gap in Malaysia.” Journal of Economi Malaysia 46 (1): 13-25.
Singh, Vall, and Susan Vinnicombe. 2004. “Why so few Women directors in top UK boardrooms?
Evidence and theoretical explanations.” Corporate Governance 12 (4): 479-488.
Spector, Paul E., Carry L. Cooper, Steven Poelmans, Tammy D. Allen, Micheal P. O'Driscoll, Juan I.
Sanchez, Oi L. Siu. 2004. “A cross-national comparative study of work-family stressors, working
hours and well-being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo World.” Personnel Psychology
57 (1): 119-142.
The American Association of University Women- AAUW. 2016. Barriers and bias: The status of
Women in leadership. Accessed January 13, 2016. http://www.aauw.org
Valcour, Monique. 2007. “Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours
and satisfaction with work-family balance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (6): 1512-23.
Williams, Christine L. 2000. Unbending gender. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Wirth, Linda. 2001. Breaking through the glass ceiling- Women in management. Geneva: International
Labor Office. Accessed January - March 23, 2017.
http://ecampus.nmit.ac.nz/moodle/file.php/4599/Diversity/ILO__Breaking_through_the_Glass_
Ceiling_women_in_management_full_2001.pdf
Wright, Erik O. 1997. Class counts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Volume 3, Number 1, 137-166, January-June 2018 doi:10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
doi.org/10.1344/JESB201x.x.j0xx
Online ISSN: 2385-7137 COPE Committee on Publication Ethics
http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/JESB Creative Commons License 4.0
166
Wrigley, Brenda J. 2002. “What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how Women view the glass ceiling
in public relations and communications management.” Journal of Public Relations Research 14
(1): 27-55.
Ying, Zhuge, Joyce Kaufman, Diane M. Sineone, Herbert Chen, and Omaida Velazguez. 2011. Is there
still a glass ceiling for Women in academic surgery?” Annals of Surgery 253 (4): 637-643.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No
Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-comercial re-use and
distribution, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered or transformed in any way.
... According to a study conducted in Nigeria by Ganiyu, Oluwafemi, Ademola, and Olatunji (2018), women made only slight advancements up until a specific level in the organizational hierarchy to the glass ceiling, which prevented them from achieving the highest management levels, women held a significantly smaller share of managerial positions than men due to cultural prejudice, family-related concerns, a lack of networking opportunities, personal and organizational influences, and religious convictions [3]. ...
Article
Purpose: Despite the significant growth in women’s participation in the hotel industry workforce, Turkish women continue to encounter limited access to senior management positions. This study investigates the obstacles faced by Turkish women in their pursuit of top managerial roles within the hotel industry and explores potential strategies to break through the glass ceiling. The purpose of this study is to investigate challenges and unveil the effect of the glass ceiling on the career development of Turkish women in 3-to-5-star hotels. The research endeavors to examine the experiences and challenges stemming from gender perceptions encountered by individuals within the hotel industry. Additionally, it seeks to discern the underlying social, organizational, and individual factors contributing to the disparity in leadership or senior positions held by women within this sector. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study utilizes a qualitative research approach, employing semi-structured, in-depth interviews with employees from 3 to 5-star hotels in Antalya, conducting an inductive thematic analysis approach the research aims to investigate the challenges faced by women in advancing their careers within the hotel industry and the diverse factors influencing their workplace performance. The statistical sample of the research includes people who have different viewpoints on the subject of the research. Findings: Twelve women working within the hospitality industry were interviewed. A thematic analysis revealed three interconnected barriers contributing to the glass ceiling faced by Turkish women: cultural and social obstacles, organizational challenges, and personal hindrances. These primary barriers encompass sub-barriers that collectively reinforce the glass ceiling, impeding numerous women from attaining senior positions. This research demonstrates that overcoming the barriers—especially organizational ones—can empower Turkish women to break through the glass ceiling and realize their leadership aspirations. Additionally, the study explores the implications for policymakers, academics, and practitioners regarding the impactful contributions of Turkish women to the hotel labor market." Practical Implications: This research showed evidence that there are real barriers for these women and the findings from this study offer implications that overcoming these barriers, particularly cultural and social barriers, could help Turkish women to crack the glass ceiling and achieve their dream of leadership. Originality/Value: The Hotel industry faces a worldwide shortage of Women in Leadership positions. This study aims to explore the challenges faced by the hotel sector in retaining highly skilled female employees who aspire to pursue managerial career trajectories. In addition, this research can add value to revealing gender inequality problems faced by Muslim women employees in the hospitality industry.
... Additionally, Ganiyu et al (2018) proposed the role congruity theory that explains male is view as usually carry some traits, includes confident, controlling, and assertive form of behavior, women on the other hand carry the traits like interpersonally sensitive and nurturing form of behavior. As a result, people form the bias that view female as a group of people that will not manage a team very well [2]. Griffiths et al (2019) found that traits associated with women are generally recognized as more important in leadership, while traits associated with men are considered relatively less important. ...
Article
Full-text available
With differences in income, promotion, and opportunity continuing to impede progress toward workplace equality, persistent gender inequality in the workplace remains a major concern. The study examines at the complex interplay of factors that cause gender inequality, from cultural standards to organizational biases. A qualitative methodology is used to assess the data from various workplaces. The survey found significant gender differences in pay, representation in leadership roles, and access to professional development opportunities. Additionally, it shows how biases and cultural norms support the upkeep of these disparities. To address these issues, the research proposes a multifaceted approach that includes changes to the law, initiatives for diversity and inclusion, and tactics for personal empowerment. The study can improve society overall and create a more just workplace by putting these solutions into reality. This research explains the problem of gender inequality in the workplace and offers practical mitigation measures. By promoting more inclusive and egalitarian professional environments, we may foster the circumstances for a more just and progressive society.
... That condition continued until change began in the 20 th century when the conditions facing women started to relax (Sheth 2021). However, as Ganiyu et al. (2018) point out, the "glass ceiling" still represents a barrier to upwardly mobile women, citing a phrase coined in 1978 by Marilyn Loden. ...
Article
Advertising in India from the 1980s until very recently has portrayed women as having sole responsibility for housework, even when they are employed. Women have been expected to live with restrictions imposed by men. In the last decade, the culture has begun to acknowledge women’s rights in limited ways, in part because of rising living standards. As a result, some cutting‐edge advertisements have begun to present a wider range of roles available to women. This article examines 10 Indian TV commercials and their relation to cultural attitudes about women and their role in society. The new advertisements recognize the need for gender equality, although they still express that ideal in relatively conservative terms.
Article
One of the imperatives of the Sustainable Development Goals is the pursuit of attaining gender equality. However, the extent to which the sustainable management education project contributes to the equality of genders is rather underexplored in the academic literature. To address this gap, this article analyzes how an Executive Master's in Business Administration (EMBA) delivered by a Latin American school shapes the female and male students' thinking and decision-making styles and how these affect their preparedness to perform in top-management positions. After discussing how the topic has been addressed, we map the curricular design of the program against its capacity to potentiate participants' learning styles according to specific top management position skills. Then the progression of the students is reviewed by examining the evolution of their thinking styles from the beginning to the end of the program. The measurement instrument used to assess participants' thinking styles is the Neethling Brain Instrument (NBI), which is based on neuroscience discoveries related to the integrative use of the brain in decision-making processes. The study finds that the program does not fully potentiate men's and women's capabilities needed to perform in top-management positions. However, it also shows that the training tends to reinforce women's orientation to execution and personal relationships and men's preferences for analytical, risk-taking, and strategic thinking. Finally, it concludes by making recommendations at the level of curriculum design, including personalized support for students during and after the program, as well as broader considerations to advance the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME).
Article
Full-text available
Due to the ever-changing organizational and societal conditions that make reliance on external definitions of success unworkable or undesirable, subjective career success has remained a critical topic in careers studies. Among the drivers of subjective career success, research has identified personality traits and job resources as essential sources. Grit, in the form of a personality trait, together with I-deals (job resource) and perceptions of employees’ glass ceiling can provide new insights regarding factors, which can heighten employees’ subjective career success. Therefore, the main purpose of the study is to investigate the direct and indirect effect of grit on each dimension of subjective career success via I-deals and perceptions of the glass ceiling. Surveys from 221 female security forces from both private and public sector in Oyo state, Nigeria, were collected and the data was analyzed using the smartPLS. The results showed that grit is positively related to I-deals, glass ceiling and career satisfaction, but not to happiness, psychological wellbeing, and work engagement. I-deals mediated the relationship between grit and subjective career success’ dimensions, while the glass ceiling did not. This study was able to infer that personality trait (grit) has much to relate with how women perceive the existence of the glass ceiling in their organization.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of the study is to investigate factors influencing career progression of female professional employees in the construction industry in order to identify challenges and suggest possible mitigations. An integrative review of purposively sampled literature on career progression is used to arrive at challenges to career progression faced by female professionals in the South African construction industry. The limitation of the study is its theoretical nature at this stage. Findings show that involvement of women in the construction industry has increased. However, women apparently still face challenges in progressing to senior positions in their careers. Some noted common factors include training, mentoring support, and networking. Implications of the study include the need to study factors influencing female career progression with the support of empirical data. There is also a need to examine the factors that act as barriers and analyse their nature in order to develop possible mitigations, which are also nuanced with the experiences of the subject population. The study forms a basis for understanding influencing factors and challenges to career progression of female professionals. This study is at its early stage of a more extensive research project and will be used as the foundation for empirical studies.
Article
Stigmas and incivility are common across all facets of sport, yet empirical examination is lacking, especially when it comes to women in leadership positions. In intercollegiate athletics, the senior woman administrator position is designated by the National Collegiate Athletic Association as the highest ranking woman serving the athletic department, so this study examined the extent to which stigma consciousness and workplace incivility impact the work outcomes of 234 senior woman administrators. Structural equation modeling and open-ended responses demonstrated that stigma consciousness is associated with higher perceived incivility, which is associated with lower job satisfaction and perceived organizational opportunity. Thus, stigma consciousness and workplace incivility not only operate as influential independent factors within the workplace setting, but stigma consciousness also serves as an antecedent to workplace incivility. Managerial strategies empowering professionals may help reduce stigmas, prevent uncivil behaviors in the workplace, and ultimately, improve outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
The paper identifies and examines the legion of institutionalized discriminatory cultural practices that are often meted out on Igbo female genders in Nigeria. It further reviews the existing legal framework on women's rights at the national, regional and international levels. The paper further highlights and discusses factors that have impeded the elimination of these obnoxious cultural practices amongst the Igbos of South East Nigeria It inter-alia calls for an urgent legislative intervention; more involvement of traditional rulers, lawyers and Judges to combat these practices; more intensified reorientation of the Nigerian police; overhauling of the social institution, and more educational opportunities and political appointments for women. Recommendations are proffered on the best way forward in order to eliminate these harmful cultural practices or at least minimize their occurrences.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the fact that women possess the required knowledge, skills, competencies, training and experiences to perform effectively and efficiently in construction industry, they experience entry and career advancement barriers. This research examines the effects of glass ceiling syndrome on women career advancement in construction industry. Data were obtained through structured questionnaire distributed to workers of selected construction companies. The findings reveal that some of the barriers mentioned in the literature against women career advancement in construction are prevalent in Nigeria, except the existence of equality in respect of male and female in terms of employment and career development opportunity. Also, low women participation in Nigerian construction industry begins in choosing course, education and continues throughout recruitment process. The aim is to encourage women's participation in construction industry and employers to tackle the industry " s environmental issues by introducing flexible work hour, reducing workload and making the works less tedious and stressful. Also, use of foul languages, harassment of women should be eradicated and continuous supports to balance and family responsibilities should be given.
Article
Full-text available
More women participate in the labour force nowadays than in the past. However, they do not join the workforce as equal members. Segregation in occupational distribution and pay differentials between men and women remain pervasive. This article uses data from the Malaysian Population and Family Survey 2004 to shed light on the inequality in earnings based on the framework developed by Brown et al. (1980). The empirical results suggest that segregation per se works to the advantage of women. A surprising finding is that the intra-occupational component, which is unjustified by reference to observed characteristics, is responsible for the overall earnings gap. It is likely that the within-occupational earnings discrimination reflects hierarchical segregation. Also, a portion of the earnings gap is attributed to a sample selection effect. Our results suggest that a timely policy intervention would aim to find ways of improving the returns to characteristics earned by women in a given occupation.
Book
How did the ‘glass ceiling’ and related characteristics of female labour force experience become recognised as a proper object for social scientific study? Exploring interactions between the contexts of discovery and justification reveals how this phenomenon was recognised and established by combining different forms of expertise and experience that came from both within and without the social scientific fields. The resulting object of study might well be described as embedding a ‘civil or community ontology’, for the intersections of facts and values in these different knowledge communities was equally important in defining the content of that object of research.