Technical ReportPDF Available

A review of Ofsted's test of the reliability of short inspections

Authors:

Abstract

(Ofsted) regulates, inspects and publishes openly detailed inspection reports of providers of services that care for children and young people, and provide education and vocational skills development for learners of all ages outside of higher education in England. Approximately 21,500 state-funded schools are subject to inspection by Ofsted. In March 2017 Ofsted published the results of its own research which set out to test if decisions and judgements were being made consistently by different inspectors during short inspections. This publication outlines the findings from a critique of Ofsted’s account of the implementation of the test and the interpretation of the results.
A preview of the PDF is not available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Inspection has been an increasingly important feature of central monitoring of education in the 1990s. This article examines the technical reliability of inspection processes in initial teacher training, drawing extensively on methodology and procedures adopted by the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) between 1996 and 1998. A definition of reliability is advanced and tested against the procedures of inspection, especially by examining the security of internal and external judgements at the pass/fail borderline and the moderation and training procedures deployed by OFSTED. The methodology of inspection is found to be insufficiently reliable for the consequences which flow from it. Tensions are explored between the technicist model of inspection underlying OFSTED initial teacher training procedures and the ‘informed conoisseurship’ model hitherto deployed by members of Her Majesty's Inspectorate. In consequence, there are unresolved tensions between the expressed aspiration for ‘improvement through inspection’ and the use of inspection to police compliance.
Article
An important development in the UK public sector is the rating and classification of service providers. The authors examine a significant exercise of this kind: the 'star' ratings awarded to local authority social services departments in England. The article explains why it is difficult to accept the Government's claim that these star ratings provide a significant advance in public accountability.
Different systems, different identities: school inspectors in England and Sweden a comparative study
  • J Baxter
  • A Hult
Baxter, J., Hult, A. (2013). Different systems, different identities: school inspectors in England and Sweden a comparative study. In: European Conference for Educational Research, Istanbul, September 9-13, 2013: Educational Improvement and Quality Assurance, Network 11 (pp. 1-30).
Exclusive: Leading critic of Ofsted's reliability admits watchdog now 'doing well
  • A Bloom
Bloom, A. (2017). Exclusive: Leading critic of Ofsted's reliability admits watchdog now 'doing well'. Available at: https://www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-leading-critic-ofstedsreliability-admits-watchdog-now
Education and Employment Select Committee, Fourth report: The Work of OFSTED: Volume I. London: The Stationary Office
  • House
  • Commons
House of Commons (1999). Education and Employment Select Committee, Fourth report: The Work of OFSTED: Volume I. London: The Stationary Office.
Ann Pritchard, Her Majesty's Inspector, takes us through a short inspection
  • Ofsted
Ofsted (2017). Ann Pritchard, Her Majesty's Inspector, takes us through a short inspection. Ofsted: developments in education inspection. Available at: https://educationinspection.blog.gov.uk/2017/09/26/ann-pritchard-her-majestys-inspector-takes-usthrough-a-short-inspection/
School inspection handbook
  • Ofsted
Ofsted (2018). School inspection handbook. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69
HMCI's monthly commentary
  • A Spielman
Spielman, A. (2017). HMCI's monthly commentary: March 2017. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hmcis-monthly-commentary-march-2017
Not all judgments are the same: a quantitative analysis of the interrater reliability of inspectors at The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate
  • S Tuijn
  • F J G Janssens
  • Van Den
  • H Bergh
  • S G F Robben
Tuijn, S., Janssens, F.J.G., Van Den Bergh, H. & Robben, S.G.F. (2009). Not all judgments are the same: a quantitative analysis of the interrater reliability of inspectors at The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate [Het ene oordeel is het andere niet: Kwantitatieve analyse van de variatie bij IGZ-inspecteurs].