ArticlePDF Available

The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Accuracy and the Idiom Principle in the Writing of EFL Intermediate Students

Authors:
  • Université Abdelhamid Ibn Badis Mostaganem _Algeria

Abstract and Figures

The use of collocation has always been considered as a good yardstick by which the idiomaticity of second language (L2) use is reliably judged. Hence, this study aims at investigating the relationship between optimizing the lexical approach and improving the collocational accuracy and the ability to operate on the idiom principle in the writing of Algerian English Freshmen. To carry out this research, an experimental and a control group were assigned for a quasi-classroom experiment. While the experimental group was taught collocations based on the principled practices of the lexical approach, the control group was taught conventionally with on special attention paid to collocations. Data was collected from 124 compositions (pre/posttests) done by these learners. Results of this investigation show that there is a correlation between training students to chunk language successfully and the increase of collocational strength with high mutual information (MI) scores in their writing. Additionally, the chunk-based instructional program helped the experimental group develop a habit of processing language as building blocks and this, in turn, reflects these students’ tendency to operate on the idiom principle. Correspondingly, the paper concludes with pointing out some implications for effective acquisition of L2 lexis and future horizons related to developing the idiomacity of L2 writing.
Content may be subject to copyright.
176
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018 Pp.176-187
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no3.12
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Accuracy and the Idiom
Principle in the Writing of EFL Intermediate Students
Mohamed Debabi
Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages
Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University
Mostaganem, Algeria
Noureddine Guerroudj
Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Languages and Arts
Djilali Liabès University
Sidi-Bel Abbès, Algeria
Abstract
The use of collocation has always been considered as a good yardstick by which the idiomaticity
of second language (L2) use is reliably judged. Hence, this study aims at investigating the
relationship between optimizing the lexical approach and improving the collocational accuracy
and the ability to operate on the idiom principle in the writing of Algerian English Freshmen. To
carry out this research, an experimental and a control group were assigned for a quasi-classroom
experiment. While the experimental group was taught collocations based on the principled
practices of the lexical approach, the control group was taught conventionally with on special
attention paid to collocations. Data was collected from 124 compositions (pre/posttests) done by
these learners. Results of this investigation show that there is a correlation between training
students to chunk language successfully and the increase of collocational strength with high mutual
information (MI) scores in their writing. Additionally, the chunk-based instructional program
helped the experimental group develop a habit of processing language as building blocks and this,
in turn, reflects these students’ tendency to operate on the idiom principle. Correspondingly, the
paper concludes with pointing out some implications for effective acquisition of L2 lexis and
future horizons related to developing the idiomacity of L2 writing.
Key words: collocational accuracy, high-strength collocations, EFL writing, idiom principle,
lexical approach
Cite as: Debabi, M., & Guerroudj, N.(2018). The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of
Collocational Accuracy and the Idiom Principle in the Writing of EFL Intermediate Students.
Arab World English Journal, 9 (3), 176-187.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no3.12
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
177
1. Introduction
Our daily use of language is comprised of pairs of words whose combinatory nature cannot
be explained by grammar only but also by referring to the arbitrary nature of that language.
Therefore, the ability to produce language naturally and communicate effectively can only be
achieved through the use of words that frequently collocate. Such performance in language is
typical of native speaker competence or at least native-like proficiency. In this respect, Bollinger
(1979) confirms that "our language does not expect us to blind everything starting from lumber,
nails or blue-print, but expect us to use an incredible large number of prefabs" (p.23). Collocation,
as a term used mostly to describe the habitual co-ocurrence of two or more words (Stubbs, 1996),
is the one-size-fits-all concept which includes many kinds of ready-made chunks in language. Any
underuse, overuse or misuse of collocations will be the number one source of oddity and foreign
sounding since collocations enable one to compensate for non-nativeness of L2 use mainly in
writing (Pawley & Syder, 1983).
English as a foreign language (EFL) learners ,mainly intermediate, seem to be marked
down because they don’t know the four of five major collocations that serve as the defining
vocabulary for the main idea they are writing about (Hill, 2000). This departure from the natural
use of language is due to the violation of what Sinclair (1987) calls the “idiom principle”.
According to this idiomatic account of language production, any text is in nature a compilation of
prefabricated utterances and semi-preconstructed phrases that are stored in our mental lexicon and
retrieved as single choices for later use (Wray, 2002). Evidence that supports the pervasiveness of
formulaic sequences, namely collocations, in the written production of language abounds in the
literature. For instance, according Erman and Warren (2000) more than 40℅ of native speaker
writing is in nature formulaic .In addition, Glucksberg (1989) assets that on average four
collocations are produced in every minute of fluent language use. Thus, non-native speakers may
be at a disadvantage of producing language in violation of the holistic nature (idiom principle) and
instead in favor of the use of separate words and novel constructs. This tendency, which Sinclair
(1991) refers to as “the open choice principle”, is usually attributed to the practices of unorthodox
methods the likes of the Grammar Translation Method (GTM). Such primitive practices are very
likely to produce L2 learners who are grammatically competent but communicative and
collocationally impaired in the sense that their choice of words will be more typical of the first
language (L1) than the target language. For this reason, our study proposes a set of classroom
practices based on the lexical approach in order to increase EFL learners’ sensitivity towards
idiomatic word combinations. The motive behind conducting this study is to answer the main
question of whether there is any relationship between the implementation of the lexical approach
(variable A) and the improvement of EFL learners' collocational accuracy and ability to operate
on the idiom principle (variable B). Our line of researching is then guided by the assumption that
helping EFL learners acquire the habit of chunking the input reinforces their tendency to exhibit
native-like output.
2. Literature Review
In 1720, the Irish satirist Jonathan Swift, on the significance of word choice in successful
communication, asserts "Proper words in proper places make the true definition of a style" (as
cited in Widdiwson, 1993, p.38). To this end, the proper methodology that guides the effective
leaning / teaching of how to put proper words in their proper places was devised and summed up
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
178
in the so-called lexical approach. Michael Lewis is considered to be the founding father of this
approach in 1993 but before he brought his premise to the fore, the significance of lexis in language
learning and teaching has been asserted in many publications such as the lexical syllabus by Willis
(1990), corpus linguistics by Sinclair (1991), and lexical phrases in language teaching by
Natingger and Decarrico (1992).
The lexical approach is then based on the idea that fluency centers on the acquisition of a
repository of fixed and semi-fixed phrases known as chunks. These chunks, mainly collocations,
are of prime importance since they serve as “raw data” in which the structural patterns of language
(grammar) are encoded (Lewis, 1993). Scrivener (2011) points out that the Lexical Approach
recommends an extensive exposure to language and the use of authentic materials rather than
slavishly sticking to the orthodox methodology of the Present-Practice -Produce.
Lexis was overlooked in language teaching as grammar was traditionally considered to be
the jewel in the crown of language. Moreover, having effective communicative skills was seen as
a matter of mastering the grammatical system of a given language. However, by the publications
of Lewis' new views (1993, 1997, 2000) on language use, the latter becomes defined by the lexical
approach's key principle as “consisting of grammaticalized lexis, not lexicalized grammar” (Lewis,
1993, p.36). Therefore, any fluent use of language is in nature a successful use of the building
blocks of language, in particular collocation, which is the core element of the lexis approach. The
central role of collocations in the creation of meaning was clearly explained by Lewis (1993) in
the sense that we cannot, for example, decode the verb bark without referring to the noun dog.
Since lexis carries meaning more than grammar, collocations have a generative power of meaning
and this qualifies such a habitual co-occurrence of words to be the fulcrum of any classroom
practice.
3. Method
3.1 Data Collection Tools
This study is a classroom experiment that aims to put the effectiveness of the lexical approach
to the test, i.e. it attempts to assess the impact of training Algerian EFL intermediate learners to
notice, identify and store collocations on increasing their collocational accuracy and ability to
operate on the idiom principle in their writing. To carry out this study, we first tested our subjects’
initial collocational knowledge (homogeneity) prior to the introduction of the instructional
program. The collocational test served as a placement test. The latter is designed in the form of
multiple-choice questions (see appendix A) which include the six types of lexical collocations
explained by Benson, Benson, and Ilson (1997). This test was devised by the author himself using
concordance examples taken form the British National Corpus (BNC) and Oxford Collocations
Dictionary. The validity of the test was checked by some qualified EFL teachers. Collocations
selected for the test were chosen according to their strength of association, i.e., their high mutual
information (MI). Second, as far as EFL learners' writing is concerned, each participant form both
groups was required to do a composition ranging from 200 to 250 words on a similar topic. In
other words, the subjects were asked to play the role of an eyewitness to best describe a crime
scene (see appendix B). These learners had to write compositions, inside the classroom and without
the use of dictionary, about that topic twice, i.e. before and after the introduction of the treatment.
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
179
3.2 Participant
Subjects recruited in this experiment are first year students at the department of English at
Chedli Ben Jdid University of Taref in the extreme East of Algeria. Students’ ages range between
18 and 34. Most of these participants are females (46), i.e. 74℅. The rest are males (16), i.e.
26℅.These EFL learners studied English as a compulsory school subject for almost the same
period of time (four years at Middle School and three years at High School). They were taught
English there following the practices of the competency based approach (CBA) which was adopted
by the Algerian Ministry of Education in the late 1990s. Hence, the subjects of this study are
homogenous in terms of their age and their linguistic background as well.
To ensure more of such homogeneity in terms of collocational competence, all participants
took a collocational knowledge test before the start of the experiment. Their performances in the
test were almost the same. The average score (mean) is 11.87 for the control group and 11.80 for
the experimental one. For Ethical considerations, the participants were reassured that the results
of test are only used for research purposes and not meant for any official assessment. Following
the results of that test, these students were randomly assigned to two groups. An experimental
group and a control group with 31 students in each.
3.3Procedure
To evaluate the effect of the treatment on the learners' collocational accuracy and
idiomaticity in writing, the experimental group received a training program that was meant to focus
their attention on chunking language appropriately to produce natural sounding writing. However,
the control group was taught the same content of the instructional program by the same teacher
but conventionally (examining synonyms, antonyms and the syntax of the input).
The instructional course designed to teach the experiment group lasted five months (from
January 2017 till May 2017). It consisted of 36 sessions taught by the researcher himself over 18
weeks. Each week the experimental group received two sessions. Each one was scheduled for 90
minutes, i.e. the whole class time. This instructional program is based on the practices of the lexical
approach and practitioners of this method are required to emphasize the centrality of lexis and
develop strategies for chunking the input. Therefore, the methodology that underpins each session
of the program is based on Lewis (1997) paradigm of Observe, Hypothesis, Experiment (O-H-E).
Correspondingly, the unpacking of the course content was divided into three stages:
A. Observe. After learners were warmed up and introduced to the notion of collocations, the aim
of this stage was to direct learners' attention towards lexical collocations found in the input. Each
of the first six sessions of the treatment was meant to introduce one of the six kinds of lexical
collocations (Adj+N,N+V,V+N,N+of+N,Adv+Adj,Adv+V). The major activities that were done in
this stage range from highlighting and circulating collocations to matching and crossing out the
odd ones. For example, learners were given a reading passage and then tasked with underlining a
given set of collocations. Also, to facilitate learning to chunk the input and store these building
blocks, learners were provided with typographically enhanced texts (e.g. bolded and italicised
collocations) which allow better recognition and retention of collocations. Students were also
trained to store the collocations they encounter in a lexical notebook. The latter was divided into
sections. Each one was devoted to a record a particular type of lexical collocations.
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
180
B. Hypothesise. In this stage and according to Lewis (1993,2000) and O ‘molly and Chamot
(1990) learners are expected to make prediction about language use , process the input in terms of
form and meaning, compare and contrast the input, and more importantly draw conclusions as to
certain collocations they have noticed in the earlier stage. To this end, learners were required to do
activities that boost their collocational sensitivity and develop their intuition towards the
appropriate collocates. Such classroom exercises were centred on collocation grid (near
synonyms), providing missing collocations in addition to activities that reinforce using collocation
dictionary to correct miscollocations. It is in this stage that learners'mental lexicon was enriched
as they explored examples of collocations in use taken from the British National Corpus (BNC) in
the form of screenshots that we provided inside the classroom.
C. Experiment. Last but not least, learners in this step were required to check the hypothesis they
had about the use of a particular aspect of language, in our case lexical collocation, in the previous
stage. Thus, learners were involved in communicative activities that were meant to help them
convert the intake into output and dismiss their incomplete knowledge of the phraseological nature
of language which might be in violation of the arbitrariness of collocation. As Lewis (2000) puts
“the communicative situations a learner experiences in or outside the classroom provide the ideal
opportunity to use language” (p.178). To illustrate, learners were engaged in expand the event
task” that was introduced by Wilberg (1987) and developed later by Lewis (2000).Ergo, they
were required to write four or five nouns that are strongly associated with a topic about something
happened to them. Next, learners made use of collocation dictionary they had on their cell phones
to provide verbs and adjectives which collocate with those nouns, then the adverbs which combine
with the verbs. In so doing, students were able to contextualise the collocations they learnt by using
them to write short paragraphs about something related to their personal life (communicative use
of language).
4. Results
The findings of this study emerged from a variety of statistically processed data that is
related to the performance of learners in different tests. First of all and prior to the start of the
instructional program, learners’ initial collocational knowledge was tested to check their lexical
homogeneity before assigning them into two groups. According to the results of that test, both
groups (experimental group and control group) scored similarly.
As shown in table 1, the score average is 11.80 for the control group and 11.87 for the
experimental group. Besides, the mean difference (0.6) indicates that students in both groups had
similar knowledge and mastery of collocation before the start of the instructional course. To
Table1
Students' initial collocational knowledge.
Groups
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Mean
difference
Sig. (2-tailed)
Control
31
11.80
5.22
Experimental
31
11.87
3.68
0.6
0.22
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
181
confirm this, the independent T- test was performed. Clearly, the p-value in this test (0.22) explains
that, by conventional criteria (p>0.05), there is no statistical difference in the scores of both groups.
Table2
Students’ use of collocation in the pre-test of writing.
Group
N
Sum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Control
31
185
5.96
2.13
Experimental
31
179
5.77
2.06
Table3
Students’ use of collocation in the post-test of writing.
To identify collocations used in the participants’ compositions, we checked the learners’
combinations in the BNC which is adopted as reference corpus throughout this study. By adopting
the MI score of 3 as a standard threshold (as suggested by Durrant & Schmitt, 2009; Siyanova-
Chanturia, 2015) any combination of two words that failed to meet this standard was not labeled
as collocation. Correspondingly, the outcome of this procedure reveals that the number of
collocations identified in the pre-test of writing in both groups, as shown in table (2), (185 for the
control group and 179 for the experimental group) is quite approximate. Likewise, the average
score of the control group (M=5.96) and that of the experimental group (M=5.77) refers to the
similar abilities these groups had in producing collocations in their writing at first. However, if we
look at table (3) we can see that the number of collocations in the compositions of the posttest in
both groups differ markedly. Given that 253 and 337 are the varying amounts of collocations
produced by the control and the experimental group respectively, both groups also differ in terms
of their score average (M=8.16 for the control group and 10.18 for the experimental group).
Compared to its counterpart, the experimental group improved tremendously in the use of
collocations in writing.
Table 4
Degree of collocational strength in the pre-test of writing.
Group
N
Sum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Control
31
253
8.16
3.05
Experimental
31
337
10.87
4.27
Control group
Experimental group
Bands of MI
N
Mean
Std.Devt
N
Mean
Std.Dev
t
Low [3-
4.99]
Medium[5-
7]
High ( >7)
77
62
46
2.48
2
1.48
1.43
1.18
0.99
70
60
49
2.06
1.93
1.52
1.36
1.28
1.03
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
182
Table 5
Degree of collocational strength in the posttest of writing.
The collocations produced by both groups in the pre and posttests were further examined
to measure the strength of association between their components. For this reason, we classified
these collocations into three bands (categories) following their varying MI scores. Accordingly,
the collocational strength is defined by three degrees: low, medium and high.
As table (4) demonstrates, in the pretest half of the collocations (N=77.M=2.48) produced
in the compositions of the control group falls into the category of low-strength collocations but
only few (N=46 .M=1.48) that can be categorized as high -strength collocations. Similarly, most
of the collocations (N=70.M=2.06) produced by the experimental group can be classified as low-
strength ones and only small amount (N=49.M=1.52) of such word combinations can be labeled
as high-strength collocations. However according to table (5), in the posttest the largest proportion
of collocations (N=99.M=3.19) used by the control group are low-strength ones while the smallest
proportion (N=75.M=2.41) falls into the category of high-strength collocations. In contrast, the
highest amount of collocations (N=163.M=5.25) produced by the experimental group is of a high
strength nature as opposed to the lowest amount (N=71.M= 2.29) which is of a low-strength
nature. Table 6
Correlation coefficient between the variables
Performance
Pearson’s
correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Collocational knowledge (post experiment )
.543*
0.03
High-strength collocations (posttest of
writing)
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Since this research is aimed at assessing the relationship between the two variables ( the
lexical approach ,represented by the treatment group scores of the collocational knowledge test
after experiment, and the idiom principle, represented by these students’ use of high-strength
collocations in their posttest of writing ), we ran the Pearson’s correlation test. Results of this test,
as shown in table (6), reveal that the Pearson’s correlation is positive (r =.543). Besides, the p-
value is .03(p<.05), i.e. the correlation is statistically significant at the level .05 .In other words,
there is a positive correlation between the two aforementioned variables.
Control group
Experimental group
Bands of MI
N
Mean
Std.Devt
N
Mean
Std.Dev
t
Low[3- 4.99]
Medium[5-7]
High( > 7)
99
79
75
3.19
2.54
2.41
1.68
2.33
1.83
71
103
163
2.29
3.35
5.25
1.84
1.79
3.24
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
183
5. Discussion:
The main concern of this paper has been to assess the extent to which EFL writing can be
idiomatic as an increased attention to lexical collocations is paid. To this end, the experiment we
conducted provided the subjects with an extensive exposure to different kinds of lexical
collocations in an attempt to enrich their mental lexicon.
It can be noted from the findings of this study that the number of collocations identified in
all of the compositions of both groups is comparable. Arguably, any similarity between these
groups in terms of the number of produced collocations, in the first compositions, on the one hand
and the degree of idiomaticity of such collocations on the other hand can be accounted for form
different perspectives. At first, the majority of the participants’ writings featured collocations with
low MI scores due to the fact that this EFL learners exposure seems to have been affected by their
growing tendency to process any input as either grammatically well-formed or ill-formed language
constructs. Simply put, intermediate EFL learners rely heavily on their grammatical knowledge to
build their mental lexicon and in turn produce language accordingly. This can be the driving force
behind these learners’ word choice in the sense that poorly associated collocations are, to a great
extent, similar to free combinations. No doubt that the latter are not problematic to use, since they
considerably allow the substitution of either constituent elements which is not in violation of the
mechanisms of the L2 word order. It is noteworthy that these findings are in line with those of
Granger (1998); Howarth (1998) and Wray (2002) who point out that L2 learners tend to use
language as separate words attached together by grammar rules.
Another point to consider is the level of restrictedness between the constituent elements of
collocations in the first compositions which can be attributed to the effect of L1. In crude terms,
the participants of this study drew on their knowledge of word association in Arabic to combine
words in English. This means that such EFL intermediate learners are still unaware of the
uniqueness of the socio-cultural and arbitrary nature of L2 lexis. Such results lend support to what
was recently reported in the literature ,mainly that of Granger and Bestgen (2014) and Chen (2017)
who concluded that EFL intermediate learners avoid using strongly associated lexical items due to
their poor mental lexicon.
A clearer picture emerges if we consider the increase of the density of collocations in the
second compositions of learners. Although the effect of the lexical approach was naturalized in the
control group, the latter shows a slight improvement in the production of collocation. This is
undoubtedly natural because collocations are part of learners’ vocabulary which develops as a
result of more experience with the target language. However as for the experimental group, it is
evident that collocations mushroomed much more, not only in terms of size but also in terms of
the strength of association, due to the great impact of the pedagogical intervention. It is also wise
to acknowledge that the O-H-P classroom practice that we adopted enriched the target learners’
knowledge of the collocational range of English words, which resulted in learners getting more
able to combine words more naturally and in turn convey meaning using native- like chunks.
Furthermore, the results of this research suggest that L2 learners started gaining a processing
advantage of collocations which can tremendously help them harmonize their retrieval of language
with the appropriateness of the situational context. Such findings are significant in the sense that
they echo Pawley and Snyder’s (1983) study which highlights the processing advantage and the
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
184
effortless production of language that non-native speakers can have when they acquire
institutionalized forms.
It is worthwhile inferring form the outcome of our classroom experiment that raising
learners’ awareness of the customary nature governing the L2 word choice (co-occurring of lexical
items) can prompt adequate production of idiomatic forms. In other words, learners can feature
high-strength collocations in their writing as they notice the behavior of different lexical phrases
in language and are sensitized to the nature of the lexical gap between their L1 and the target
language. It is therefore wise to emphasize that our study, though reveals a moderate positive
correlation, experimentally confirms that the more EFL learners notice, store and retrieve
collocations the more strongly associated words their writing features. This conclusive evidence,
in turn, confirms our hypothesis that helping learners acquire the habit of chunking the input
successfully reinforces their tendency to exhibit accurate collocations and idiomatic output.
6. Conclusion
Collocation is an important aspect of natural language processing and an essential
prerequisite to produce native like language. This research paper therefore provides a major
contribution to the ongoing discussion of the acquisition of native-like building blocks. The
instructional paradigm we tested in this study proved to be highly effective in the sense that helping
EFL learners acquire the habit of perceiving language as building blocks correlates with the
acquired ability to produce language idiomatically. In the light of this study results, it can be
conclude that the success of the lexical approach lies in the fact that its underlining methodology
is of more exploratory nature than explanatory one since the lexical nature of language itself is
arbitrary, i.e. it is unlikely to be adequately explained by the grammatical system. Besides,
developing learners’ sensitivity towards the arbitrary nature of word co-occurrence in L2 can
tremendously help them positively transfer their tendency from operating on the L1 idiom principle
to that of the L2.
Pedagogy wise, the main implications drawn from this investigation lie is the fact that the
lexical approach can provide a shortcut methodology for EFL leaners and teachers alike to
speeding up the process of L2 acquisition by enriching learners’ mental lexicon. Textbooks writers
and syllabus designers are also recommended to consider the arbitrary nature of the target language
lexis and insure the authenticity of the teaching materials in order to increase learners’ exposure
to high-strength collocations.
Obviously, the main limitation of this study is the small number of participants and the
shortness of their compositions. Experimenting the lexical approach on a wider population and a
larger size of corpus would yield richer results. In addition, focusing our approach on the
acquisition of longer lexical chunks (e.g. idioms and proverbs) would enrich our understanding of
new and better ways to develop the acquisition of the idiom principle in L2 writing. It is hope that
the findings of this research pave the way for future inquiries to advance our understanding of the
acquisition of native-like selection.
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
185
About the Authors:
Mohamed Debabi is a high school teacher of English and a part-time teaching assistant at
university. He holds a master’s degree in Applied Linguistics and didactics form the University of
Annaba, Algeria as he is currently undertaking doctoral research in formulaic language acquisition.
His main areas of inquiry are second language acquisition and lexicology. https://orcid.org/0000-
0002-8144-3393
Prof. Noureddine Guerroudj is a lecturer in English at the University of Sidi Bel Abbes, in the
West of Algeria, and a president of the scientific committee of foreign languages’ faculty at the
same university. Prof. Guerrodji is also an editor-in chief of the Languages and Arts Journal that
is founded by Sidi Bel Abbes University. His main areas of interest include Applied Linguistics.
References:
Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1997). The BBI Dictionary of English Word
Combinations. John Benjamins Pub. Co., Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
Bolinger, D. (1979). Meaning and Memory. Experience Forms: Their Cultural and Individual
Place and Function .95-111.
Chen, W. (2017). Profiling Collocations in EFL Writing of Chinese Tertiary Learners. RELC
Journal. 0033688217716507.
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To What Extent Do Native and Non-Native Writers Make
Use of Collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics.47, 157-177.
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The Idiom Principle and the Open Choice Principle. Text-
Interdisciplinary. Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20 (1), 29-62.
Glucksberg, S. (1989). Metaphors in Conversation: How are they Understood? Why are they
Used? Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 125--143.
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated Patterns in Advanced EFL Writing: Collocations and
Formulae. In A. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp. 145-
160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2014). The Use of Collocations by Intermediate Vs. Advanced non-
Native Writers: A Bigram-Based Study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in
Language Teaching, 52(3), 229-252.
Hill J. (2000). Revising priorities: From Grammatical Failure to Collocational Success. in M.
Lewis (ed.), Teaching Collocation: Further Development in the Lexical Approach.
Oxford: Oxford University Press: 47 69.
Howarth, P. (1998). The Phraseology of Learners’ Academic Writing. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.).
Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp. 161-186). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach :The State of ELT and a Way Forward. London:
Teacher Training. Language Teaching Publication.
Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice, Hove,
England: Language Teaching Publications.
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
186
Lewis, M. (2000). “Language in a Lexical Approach” in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation:
Further Development in the Lexical Approach: 126-154; Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching.
Oxford University Press.
O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition.
Cambridge University Press.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Native like Selection
and Native like Fluency. Language and Communication, 191, 225. In J.C
Scrivener, T. (2011). Learning Teaching : The Essential Guide to Language Teaching (2nd ed).
Oxford: Macmillan Edition.
Sinclair, J.M.(1987). Collocation: A Progress Report. In: Steele, R., Tread gold, R. (Eds.),
Language Topics Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday. John Benjamins Publishing Co.,
Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). Collocation in Beginner Learner Writing: A Longitudinal
Study. System, 53, 148-160.
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and
Culture (p. 158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. G. (1993). Proper Words in Proper Places. ELT Journal, 47(4), 317-329.
Wilberg, P. (1987). One to One: A Teacher's Handbook . Language Teaching Publication.
Willis, D. (1990). The Lexical Syllabus: a New Approach to Language Teaching. London and
Glasgow: Collins.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Appendix A: Collocational Knowledge Test
Dear students, fill in the gaps by choosing the right word from the items provided between the
brackets.
1. 5,7,9 and 53 are all………… numbers (strange, weird, odd)
2. Most of the world populations live …… the poverty line ( beneath, under, bellow)
3. The sunk gives off ………smell to defend itself ( strong, powerful, heavy)
4. Ottoman remaining castles have ………history and culture ( rich ,valuable, precious)
5. Most of the newspaper articles that I read …. by reiterating the main decisions of the
parliament.( end, finish , conclude )
6. Some of those articles ……questions about how to adopt the austerity measures (rise,
arise, raise)
7. The internship can help you …… your professional skills (advance, hone, promote).
8. The suspect ……his shoulders and denied accusation ( shrugged, shook, moved)
9. Usually, at night the temperature ……………....( decreases, drops, diminishes )
10. It was midnight and my energy started to ……… (lower, flag, decrease).
11. She felt a ………..of anger when he treated her unfairly. ( surge, torrent, storm )
12. Parents feel an/a …….of pride when they see good exam results of their children (touch,
sense, aura)
13. The president was given a ….of applause as he delivered his speech ( shout , round, blast)
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 9. Number 3. September 2018
The Lexical Approach in Action: Evidence of Collocational Debabi & Guerroudj
Arab World English Journal
www.awej.org
ISSN: 2229-9327
187
14. She waited him ………. but he proved to be uninterested ( excitedly , patiently, happily)
15. She …….laid her hand on the orphan’s arm (mildly, softly, gently).
16. The guards were……injured during the explosion.( terribly, seriously , dangerously)
17. I am …….aware that everybody agrees with me (acutely, totally, entirely).
18. The room hotel we booked was ………….expensive (highly, tremendously, totally).
19. Alcohol ………………… forbidden in Saudi Arabia. (strictly, strongly, totally).
20.Only half of the young people can……..their right to vote ( exercise, perform , do )
21.The local authority can…………….it responsibilities at time(discharge, do, actualize)
22. They answered all charges ……against him by his rivals. (leveled, given, done ).
23.The company advisory panel is going the ……. a lecture this evening ( do ,deliver, make).
24.The government……….rejects any negotiation with kidnappers (totally, definitely, flatly)
25. Any government………condemns any terrorist attack (forcefully, vehemently,
extremely) Appendix B: Writing Test
Imagine you were once walking down the street and you happened to witness a crime. In no
more than 500 words, explain how you would report that attack to police by describing the crime
scene you have witnessed.
... Before the rise of the Lexical Approach, collocations were considered ''a neglected aspect" in EFL learning and teaching (Hashemi, Azizinezhad, Dravishi, 2012, p.522). Furthermore, they were, also, seen by many scholars and researchers as a major area of difficulty for EFL Arab learners (Alsakran, 2011;El-Dakhs, 2015a;Abdellah, 2015;Debabi & Guerroudj, 2018;El-Garawany, 2019). This was attributed to the unpredictable nature of how words co-occur in native speakers' utterances and written communication. ...
... As the researcher analyzed the students' written performance on the collocational competence diagnostic test, several collocational errors were identified, and it was obvious that very few correct collocations were used by the students. Therefore, results of both tests conform with the findings of the studies conducted by Alsakran (2011), Abdellah (2015), El-Dakhs (2015a), Debabi & Guerroudj (2018) and El-Garawany (2019) indicating that Arab EFL learners need more attention and direct intervention to foster their collocational knowledge and competence. ...
... Through Data-Driven Learning activities, students should be able to hypothesize the correct word combinations and discover language patterns. Then, they would try using these newly acquired expressions in different communicative contexts in the experimentation stage of a lexical lesson (Debabi & Guerroudj, 2018). ...
... This latter effort in particular qualifies the Lexical Ap-proach as a deep learning strategy necessitating learners to make an increased cognitive effort to embed concepts deeply into the long-term memory (Sagarra & Alba, 2006) and, thus, make learning more sustainable. Various research (Abdellah, 2015;Debabi & Guerroud, 2018;Fahim & Vaezi, 2011;Falahi & Moinzadeh, 2012;Seesink, 2007;Webb & Kagimoto, 2009) has shown that explicit instruction regarding the Lexical Approach and LC, increases learners' ability to identify, record, remember and reuse these prefabricated units of language. Yet, explicit knowledge about the theoretical underpinnings of the Lexical Approach or on how to work with LC is often not readily accessible to learners (Abdellah, 2015). ...
... Especially the area of strong (very fixed) LC was observed to have been influenced most positively. This was also found in studies where participants given special collocation training outperformed those without such training in the use of strong collocations (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018). In the same vein, learners who were introduced to the Lexical Approach increased the use of their strong LC with the treatment (Siyanova-Chanturia, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
This exploratory-sequential mixed method study aims at investigating the impact of a specially designed Lexical Approach-based teaching program on the use and recognition of lexical chunks. Participants came from full-time and part-time Bachelor’s degree programs at Universities of Applied Sciences in Austria. The relationships between the use and recognition of lexical chunks and the semester participants attend (2nd, 4th, 6th) and their mode of study (full- or part-time) were examined. Additionally, the usefulness of Moodle for teaching the Lexical Approach was investigated. Quantitative data was collected by using questionnaires and by testing participants’ productive and receptive knowledge of lexical chunks through appropriate tasks. Qualitative data was obtained by conducting guided interviews. Results show that the exposure to the Lexical Approach was perceived as very relevant and useful by the learners. The same is true for the accompanying Moodle activities. Also, part-time students from higher semesters seem to be even more likely to profit from the teaching program focusing on the Lexical Approach. This implies that integrating the Lexical Approach into English language teaching is a most beneficial undertaking to support and improve learners’ EFL performance.
... It suggested that, according to Lewis (1997), language is not made up of grammar and vocabulary but o�en of prefabricated mul�-word units, of which colloca�ons and fixed expressions are the most central. Fluency, in the eyes of this approach, relies heavily on the acquisi�on of chunks, which are fixed and semi-fixed word combina�ons (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018). ...
... In his later publica�on, Lewis (1997, p. 32) maintained that "it is more efficient to learn the whole and break it into parts, than to learn the parts and have to learn the whole as an extra arbitrary item". Fluency, as viewed by this approach, rests heavily on the acquisi�on of chunks, which are fixed and semi-fixed word combina�ons (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
This quasi-experimental study investigated the effectiveness of an electronic collocation-based instructional program on Jordanian EFL tenth grade students’ word knowledge. Two sections, of 25 students each, from a government school in Irbid were assigned randomly as experimental and control groups. A word knowledge pre-test, the first part of which measured word meaning and the second part assessed word collocation, was administered to find out whether the two groups were homogeneous before implementing the program. Lexical collocations in Action Pack 10 were identified, through a content analysis of certain reading passages, and those collocations were taught to the experimental group through Quizlet: a flashcard mobile application. The control group received no collocation instruction. After treatment, the two groups took a word knowledge post-test. The findings indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the overall word knowledge test and in each part of the test: word meaning and word collocation. Keywords: e-learning, collocations, word knowledge, EFL
... It suggested that, according to Lewis (1997), language is not made up of grammar and vocabulary but o�en of prefabricated mul�-word units, of which colloca�ons and fixed expressions are the most central. Fluency, in the eyes of this approach, relies heavily on the acquisi�on of chunks, which are fixed and semi-fixed word combina�ons (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018). ...
... In his later publica�on, Lewis (1997, p. 32) maintained that "it is more efficient to learn the whole and break it into parts, than to learn the parts and have to learn the whole as an extra arbitrary item". Fluency, as viewed by this approach, rests heavily on the acquisi�on of chunks, which are fixed and semi-fixed word combina�ons (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
This quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of an electronic collocation-based instructional program on Jordanian EFL tenth grade students' reading comprehension. Two sections, of 25 students each, from a government school in Irbid were assigned randomly as experimental and control groups. A Reading Comprehension pre-test, entailing five literal comprehension and five inferential comprehension questions, was administered to find out whether the two groups were equivalent before implementing the program. Lexical collocations in Action Pack 10 were identified, through a content analysis of certain reading passages, and those collocations were taught to the experimental group through Quizlet: a flashcard mobile application. The control group received no collocation instruction. After treatment, the two groups took a Reading Comprehension post-test. The findings indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the overall Reading Comprehension Test and in each part of the test: literal and inferential comprehension.
... Results by Aronson et al. (2002) that explicitly alerting learners to how challenge and mistakes support their progress has a significantly positive effect on performance levels also underline that explicit instruction does have benefits and, thus, it would stand to reason that teaching the Lexical Approach to learners including some of its theoretical underpinnings, would also lead to performance gains (e.g. Abdellah, 2015;Debabi & Guerroud, 2018;Fahim & Vaezi, 2011;Falahi & Moinzadeh, 2012;Seesink, 2007;Webb & Kagimoto, 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
Mindset can have a profound effect on language learners’ willingness to engage in learning as well as their choice of learning strategy. Growth mindset learners, who embrace challenge, could prefer deep learning strategies, which require deep cognitive engagement. Conversely, fixed mindset learners, who believe that their abilities are unchangeable, would prefer shallow learning strategies, which need less cognitive effort. To exploit an existing growth mindset and to foster the move away from a fixed mindset, this study proposes introducing the Lexical Approach as a deep learning strategy. Consequently, the research explored the relationship between mindset and learning strategy by way of an online questionnaire administered to Bachelor degree students at the UAS Burgenland, Austria. Additionally, mindset and learning strategy’s connection with age, mode of study and English achievement were examined. Results obtained from 211 participants revealed no significant relationship between mindset and learning strategy overall or with age and mode of study. However, clear trends showed that most students endorsed a growth mindset and had a strong preference for deep learning strategies. English achievement alone, despite no significant relationship with mindset and learning strategy, showed that better grades were associated with a more fixed mindset and a preference for shallower learning strategies. Based on these results the Lexical Approach as a deep learning strategy can still be useful, since a general preference for this type of approach was visible and the prevalent growth mindset would present a good basis for such a challenge.
... Likewise Seesink (2007) confirmed that the explicit teaching of collocations does help learners improve their skills -in her specific study, writing skills. Similarly, studies conducted among Algerian freshmen (Debabi & Guerroud, 2018) and Iraqi college students (Abdulqader et al., 2017) revealed that using teaching programs that focus on raising awareness of collocations contributed to accuracy of collocations in students' writing. ...
Article
Full-text available
Current educational trends, globalization and the global Covid-19 pandemic have forced institutions of higher education (HEI) worldwide to accelerate the changes already in progress in teaching and learning approaches incorporating more technological enhanced learning. Among the wide range of information-communication-technology tools, the focus here is on Learning Management Systems (LMS), which play a major role in teaching and learning pedagogy, and can help HEIs to achieve more effective learning outcomes. This exploratory research examines the usage of Learning Management Systems to support the teaching of lexical chunks in the online English language classroom at HEIs. The investigation will focus on Moodle and will identify the factors that support students’ interaction with language content and input in this digital learning environment, by looking at the use of Moodle features and activities to teach and practice lexical chunks. Findings suggest that Moodle proves of great value for online English language teaching and the practice of lexical chunks, whereby quiz activities can be used to great effect, producing motivation to engage with lexical chunks among students.
... The instructor provided guidelines or question prompts for the students to accomplish tasks centered on the lexical approach (Lewis, 1993), which were designed to support each stage. This approach emphasizes that students should be able to understand and produce lexical phrases as chunks, to perceive language patterns, and to have meaningful word usage at their disposal (Debabi & Guerroudj, 2018). To complete the tasks, the students were required to use YouGlish video clips, which provided authentic, often spoken, lexical examples in contexts of particular situations or topics, thereby providing memorable foundations for real-life communication skills and enabling learners to acquire spoken English with ease and confidence (Ali & Celik, 2019). ...
... The instructor provided guidelines or question prompts for the students to accomplish tasks centered on the lexical approach (Lewis, 1993), which were designed to support each stage. This approach emphasizes that students should be able to understand and produce lexical phrases as chunks, to perceive language patterns, and to have meaningful word usage at their disposal (Debabi & Guerroudj, 2018). To complete the tasks, the students were required to use YouGlish video clips, which provided authentic, often spoken, lexical examples in contexts of particular situations or topics, thereby providing memorable foundations for real-life communication skills and enabling learners to acquire spoken English with ease and confidence (Ali & Celik, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Although videos are now used pervasively in English as a Foreign Language settings, most existing literature centers on learners as knowledge receivers or passive video viewers (Lialikhova, 2014; Fisher & Frey, 2015; Bakar et al., 2019). Rarely do studies involving videos engaged learners as knowledge generators or active, self-directed learners. To fill this research gap, the current study examined the effects of the online-video pronunciation dictionary YouGlish, which employs a lexical approach on learners' speaking skills, including pronunciation, intonation, word usage, and strategies that learners applied while using YouGlish as well as their reactions to it. The results revealed that YouGlish can help learners make progress in their oral skills, especially in terms of word usage, by providing meaningful context that helps them comprehend how oral English is used in real life. The findings revealed the process of using YouGlish generated students to become more active and self-directed learners, rather than remained as passive receivers of knowledge.
Article
Using collocation is a key part of second language ability (Granger, Sylviane. 2018. Formulaic sequences in learner corpora: Collocations and lexical bundles. In Anna Siyanova-Chanturia & Ana Pellicer-Sanchez (eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective , 228–247. New York: Routledge; Nattinger, James R. & Jeamette S. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical phrases and language teaching . Oxford: Oxford University Press; Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2004. Collocations in a learner corpus . Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.; Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistics: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication , 191–228. London: Longman). Researchers often hypothesize that the influence of the first language is an important factor in the production and understanding of unconventional collocations (Huang, Li-Shi. 2001. Knowledge of English collocations: An analysis of Taiwanese EFL learners. Paper presented at the Texas Foreign Languguage Education Conference, Texas ; Laufer, Bhatia & Tina Waldman. 2011. Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61(2). 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x ; Phoocharoensil, Supakorn. 2013. Cross-linguistic influence: Its impact on L2 English collocation production. English Language Teaching 6(1). 1–10) but we are only now starting to understand this. The present study provides a robust investigation of cross-linguistic influences by exploring how Vietnamese influenced Vietnamese learners’ use of English language verb-noun and adjective noun collocations in 104 350-word argumentative essays, using a framework derived from Jarvis, Scott. 2012. The detection-based approach: An overview. In S. Jarvis & S. A. Crossley (eds.), Approaching language transfer through text classification: Explorations in the detection-based approach , 1st ed., Vol. 64, 1–33. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, drawing on homogeneity among speakers of Vietnamese; heterogeneity between users of Vietnamese and other language; and formal and conceptual congruity between collocations learners produce in English and equivalent terms in Vietnamese. The study found that less than 10% of the collocations learners produced were unconventional and of these, 40% of collocations were influenced by the first language (L1); errors associated with incorrect use of prepositions in verb-noun collocations (e.g. the addition, omission or misuse of prepositions) are strongly L1-motivated. Learners make errors with not only incongruent collocations (collocations with no direct L1 equivalents) but also with congruent collocations (collocations with direct L1 translation).
Article
Full-text available
Phraseological competence, the use of (semi-)prefabricated expressions in language, is a major component of second language acquisition. Recent research focused on lexical bundles, i.e. recurrent contiguous strings of words, has highlighted quantitative and qualitative differences between native and non-native speaker use of these strings. Few studies, however, have investigated the development of phraseological competence as a function of degree of proficiency in L2. Relying on a methodology used by Durrant and Schmitt (2009: IRAL 47, 157–177) to compare native and non-native speakers, the present study identifies significant differences in the way in which intermediate and advanced learners use collocations. In particular, the intermediate learners tend to overuse high frequency collocations (such as 'hard work') and underuse lower-frequency, but strongly associated, collocations (such as 'immortal souls'). The concluding section addresses the limits of the study and points to possible applications in foreign language teaching and automated scoring.
Chapter
Full-text available
Over the last twenty years, phraseology has become a major field of pure and applied research in Western European and North American linguistics. This book is made up of authoritative contributions from leading specialists who examine the increasingly crucial role played by ready-made word-combinations in language acquisition and adult language use. After a wide-ranging introduction by the editor, the book introduces the main theoretical approaches, analyses the corpus data and phrase typology, and finally considers the application of phraseology to associated disciplines including lexicography, language learning, stylistics, and computational analysis. This book is the first comprehensive and up-to-date account of the subject to be published in English. Series Information Series ISBN: 0-19-961811-9 Series Editors: Richard W. Bailey, Noel Osselton, and Gabriele Stein; Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology provides a forum for the publication of substantial scholarly works on all issues of interest to lexicographers, lexicologists, and dictionary users. It is concerned with the theory and history of lexicography, lexicological theory, and related topics such as terminology, and computer applications in lexicography. It focuses attention too on the purposes for which dictionaries are compiled, on their uses, and on their reception and role in society today and in the past.
Article
The present study explores the under-researched area of collocation use with learners from different proficiency levels. The study investigates different types of collocations and the learners’ elaboration of their collocation use. A total of 194 students from three different years of study in a Chinese university wrote compositions on the same topic, and 42 of them were invited to post-writing interviews on collocation use. The compositions were used to retrieve collocations, and the interviews to explore each learner’s reflections on collocation use. The results showed that learners fail to demonstrate consistent improvement in the use of collocation in terms of frequency and association strength. The overwhelming majority of the collocations in learner writing are below the MI threshold. The present study also found that learners at the advanced stage of learning need both awareness for collocations, and more importantly, awareness for low-frequency collocations with high MI scores.
Article
This contribution derives from a lecture given by Professor H. G. Widdowson in Oxford in October 1992. The occasion was the first Oxford/BBC Lecture at Rhodes House, University of Oxford. The talk addresses a number of current and contentious issues in English language education concerning 'linguistic property' and 'linguistic propriety'. ELT Journal is pleased to publish this inaugural lecture, and thus complete the cycle of public lecture, broadcast, and print.
Article
The assumptions forming the basis of this study are that the language-user has available a number of more or less preconstructed phrases and that the production of texts involves alternation between word-for-word combinations–which we refer to as adherence to the open choice principle (after Sinclair (1991))–and preconstructed multi-word combinations, which we refer to as making use of the idiom principle (again after Sinclair). The main aim of the study is to get an impression of the impact that this alternation has. on the structure of texts Therefore a mode of analysis has been worked out revealing how multi-word combinations combine with each other and with words combined according to the open choice principle. This is the main contribution of the study. Another important contribution is the revelation that there is a large amount of prefabricated language in both spoken and written texts (on average around half of the texts), which makes it impossible to consider idioms and other multi-word combinations as marginal phenomena.
Article
Usage-based models claim that first language learning is based on the frequency-based analysis of memorised phrases. It is not clear though, whether adult second language learning works in the same way. It has been claimed that non-native language lacks idiomatic formulas, suggesting that learners neglect phrases, focusing instead on orthographic words. While a number of studies challenge the claim that non-native language lacks formulaicity, these studies have two important shortcomings: they fail to take account of appropriate frequency information and they pool the writing of different learners in ways that may mask individual differences. Using methodologies which avoid these problems, this study found that non-native writers rely heavily on high-frequency collocations, but that they underuse less frequent, strongly associated collocations (items which are probably highly salient for native speakers). These findings are consistent with usage-based models of acquisition while accounting for the impression that non-native writing lacks idiomatic phraseology.