ArticlePDF Available

TCT-867 Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in an elderly and octogenarian all-comer population

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Received: 9 October 2017
|
Revised: 6 November 2017
|
Accepted: 7 November 2017
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12472
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
9-month results of polymer-free sirolimus eluting stents
in young patients compared to a septuagenarian and
octogenarian all-comer population
Behrouz Kherad MD
1
|
Matthias Waliszewski PhD
1,2
|
Matthias Leschke MD
3
|
Muhammad Ali Kader MD
4
|
LiewHoungBangMD
5
|
Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda MD
6
|
Burkert Pieske MD
1
|
Florian Krackhardt MD
1
1
Department of Internal Medicine and
Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin
Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
2
Medical Scientific Affairs, B.Braun
Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany
3
Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und
Pneumologie, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen,
Germany
4
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Pulau
Pinang, Penang, Malaysia
5
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Queen
Elizabeth II, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
6
Servicio de Hemodinámica y Cardiología
Intervencionista, Hospital General
Universitario de Ciudad Real, Spain
Correspondence
Florian Krackhardt, MD, Department of Internal
Medicine and Cardiology, Charité
Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow,
Augustenburger Platz 1D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
Email: florian.krackhardt@charite.de
Objectives: To evaluate the 9-month safety and efficacy of polymer-free sirolimus
eluting drug eluting stents in septuagenarians and octogenarians.
Methods: An all-comer, worldwide single armed trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier
NCT02629575) was conducted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of an ultra-thin
strut, polymer-free sirolimus eluting stent (PF-SES). The primary endpoint was the 9-month
target revascularization rate (TLR). Secondary endpoints included the rates of major adverse
cardiac events (MACE), stent thrombosis (ST) and bleeding (BARC) in septuagenarians
(70 years, <80 years), and in octogenarians (80 years) to be compared to the younger
patient group (<70 years).
Results: A total of 1607 patients were treated with PF-SES in the sub-70-year-old age
group, 694 in septuagenarians, and 371 in the octogenarian patient group. At 9 months,
the MACE rates were 7.2% in octogenarians, 5.3% in septuagenarians, and 3.0% in the
younger patient group (P= 0.001). These were mostly driven by all-cause mortality
(4.4% vs 1.9% vs 0.6%, P< 0.001) while the TLR rates were only numerically lower in
the younger age group (P= 0.080). BARC 1-5 bleeding events were more frequent in
the older age group (1.9% vs 2.7% vs 4.6%, P= 0.012) whereas the rates for ST were not
different (0.7% vs 0.6% vs 0.6%, P= 0.970).
Conclusions: In octogenarians treated with PF-SES, the rates for MACE, overall
mortality, and bleeding are higher as compared to the younger age groups. However,
the rates for TLR and ST were not significantly different across the investigated age
groups. PF-SES are safe and effective in octogenarians.
KEYWORDS
drug-eluting stent, octogenarian, sirolimus, ultra thin strut
1
|
INTRODUCTION
The very elderly age group (85 years) amounting to 6.5 million in
2015, will double between 2030 and 2035 according to the US census
(US census bureau, 2017).
1
It represents therefore the fastest growing
segment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
2
Octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty
(PCI) are a very challenging treatment population which is characterized
Behrouz Kherad and Matthias Waliszewski contributed equally to this manuscript.
338
|
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/joic J Interven Cardiol. 2018;31:338344.
by morphologically more difficultlesions and higher rates of targetlesion
revascularization (TLR) and mortality.
3
In particular peri-interventional
mortality in this octogenarian patient population can be in the 7-8%
range in case of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
4
When treating older
patients, the interventionalistis plagued by balancing the risk-to-benefit
ratio of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantations which require dual
antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) between 6 and 12 months
5
depending on
and the increased risk of bleeding and stent thrombosis (ST).
3
To untie
this Gordian knot of choosing the proper revascularization strategy
while managing the risks of bleeding and ST, and to achieve acceptably
low TLR rates, may be facilitated with the new generation of polymer-
free DES. One potential candidate to resolve this dilemma is the use of
polymer-free sirolimus/probucol DES which was previously compared
to a zotarolimus-eluting stent in a large randomized trial
6
with a long-
term follow-up of 5 years
7
and subgroup analysis in diabetics
8
and
patients with ST elevation infarction.
9
We report the results of a previously published large all-comers
population
10
registry with a focus on septuagenarian and octogenarian
subgroups.
2
|
METHODS
2.1
|
Study population, end points, and definitions
On the basis of the international ISAR 2000 all-comers registry
population
10
(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575) a post-hoc
subgroup analysis was conducted in three age groups, that is, <70 years,
septuagenarians (70 years, <80 years), and in octogenarians (80 years).
The primary end point was TLR at 9 months. Secondary end points
were the 9-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate, the
in-hospital MACE rate, and the corresponding rates of myocardial
infarction (MI) and peri-procedural mortality. Furthermore, the acute/
subacute ST rate was determined as defined by the ARC criteria.
11
The
BARC scale was used in our assessment to determine the severity of
bleeding episodes.
12
A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m
2
was the
limit to define end stage renal disease with a cut-off GFR rate for
mandatory dialysis of <15 mL/min/1.73 m.
2
Severely tortuous vessels
were defined with angulations >45°.
2.2
|
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Due to the all-comers character of this study, patients 18 years of age
with stable angina and objective proof of ischemia or patients with ACS
had to meet the requirements for PCI.
13
De novo or restenotic lesions
with reference diameters from 2.0 to 4.0 mm could be treated in single
or multiple vessels.
2.3
|
Procedures and medication
Femoral or radial vascular access was admissible with recommended
introducer sheaths of at least five French. Either direct stenting or
pre-dilatation with a balloon catheter of any given preference were
allowed by the study protocol. According to the institutional guidelines
of the cardiac center, intravenous heparin (70 IU/kg) was given in all
patients and supplemented when required. Platelet aggregation
inhibitor loading was not mandatory, however, it was recommended
prior to the procedure. Post-procedural thienopyridines were not
restricted in choice, that is, clopidogrel 75 mg/d, prasugrel 10 mg/d,
or ticagrelor 2 × 90 mg/d. Acetylsalicylic acid 100-325 mg/d was
prescribed life long.
2.4
|
Materials
All patients were treated with PF-SES angioplasty (Coroflex© ISAR,
B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany). Briefly, its cobalt-chromium bare
metal backbone has ultra-thin struts (50/60 µm) which are sand-
blasted to create a microporous, abluminal surface for the polymer-
free matrix consisting of sirolimus (1.2 μg/mm
2
stent surface), and
probucol as the excipient to modulate drug elution.
2.5
|
Data collection and ethics
An established data capture system with a proven track record
14
was
used which allowed for plausibility checks during all stages of data
entry. Data quality issues were handled on a national level through
dedicated contacts to the corresponding study nurses in each cardiac
center. Follow-up time windows were closely monitored and
automatic email alerts were sent to the corresponding study nurse.
All ethics votes prior to patient recruitment for both study cohorts
were obtained from relevant national or local ethics committees. This
non-interventional study was approved by national ethics committees
as mandated by local law. In France the Comité Consultative sur le
Traitement de lInformation en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la
Santé (CCTIRS) and the Commission Nationale de linformatique et des
Libertés (CNIL) approved this study prior to patient recruitment.
2.6
|
Statistics
The significance level αof 0.05 was used for all tests. The two-sided
Fisher's exact test or the Chi
2
statistic were used whenever applicable
for dichotomous variables, whereas continuous variables were
compared with the unpaired t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test in
case the Shapiro-Wilk test revealed a strong deviation from a normal
distribution. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted based on
the log-rank test. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM, Munich, Germany) was used
for all statistical analyses whereas biometricestimates for the previously
conducted unselected patient cohorts were calculated with nQuery/
nTerim version 2.0 (Statistical Solutions Ltd. Cork, Ireland).
3
|
RESULTS
3.1
|
Patients
As reported elsewhere
10
a total of 2877 patients were recruited in
the Coroflex ISAR 2000 registry. Significant differences for male
KHERAD ET AL.
|
339
gender (P<0.001), hypertension (P<0.001), and the rates of
STEMI/NSTEMI (P< 0.001) were observed across age groups
(Table 1). The rate of older patients was higher in Europe, for
example, octogenarian patients amounted to 15.1% of all patients
treated in Europe versus only 7.6% in Asia. In contrast, in patients
of less than 70 years of age the corresponding rates were 50.6%
versus 68.3% (P
group
< 0.001).
3.2
|
Lesions, procedures, and co-medication
The distributions of treated vessels are different across age groups.
Noteworthy is the higher rate of lesions in the left anterior descending
(LAD) coronary artery in octogenarians (P
group
= 0.009). In addition,
except for the rates of chronic total occlusions, bifurcations and the
rate of AHA/ACC type B2/C type lesions; all other lesion morphologi-
cal characteristics were significantly different across age groups
(Table 2). Pre-dilatation (Table 2) was more frequently done in older
patients (44.3% vs 37.7% vs 35.6%, P= 0.004) and higher inflation
pressures were applied in older patients as well (14.4 atm vs 14.1 atm
vs 13.8 atm, P= 0.003).
Preferred peri-procedural antiplatelet agents (Table 3) in octoge-
narians were primarily clopidogrel (59.8%) and prasugrel (15.3%). Oral
anti-coagulants were more frequently prescribed in octogenarians and
septuagenarians as compared to the age group <70 years (2.7% vs
2.9% vs 0.7%, P= 0.003). Dual anti-platelet therapy duration (Table 4)
was shortest in the octogenarian subgroup as compared to the
younger age groups (9.5 ± 3.2 months vs 9.8 ± 2.9 months vs 10.5 ± 2.5
months, P< 0.0001). Triple therapy (Table 3) was prescribed in 2.9%
(septuagenarians) and 2.7% (octogenarians) which was almost
threefold as high as the corresponding rate in the younger age group
(1.1%, P
group
= 0.003).
3.3
|
Clinical outcomes
The primary endpoint TLR (Table 5) at 9 months was 3.1%
(10/320) in octogenarians, 3.0% (24/789) in septuagenarians, and
1.7% (24/1404) in patients <70 years of age. Despite no
differences in terms of TLR across the age groups (P=0.080),
the 9-month accumulated MACE rate (Figure 1, log-rank
P< 0.001) was the highest in octogenarians 7.2% (23/320) mostly
driven by increased overall mortality 4.4% (14/320). Bleeding
occurred more frequently in octogenarians as compared to the
younger age groups (4.6% vs 2.7% vs 1.9%, P=0.012) whereas
there was no difference in the rates of ST (P=0.970). In
particular, BARC 2-5 bleeding episodes were more frequent in
octogenarians as compared to the younger age groups (2.7% vs
0.6% vs 0.6%, P<0.001).
In patients who were on triple therapy, we found a 2.0%
(1/50) 9-month MACE rate with six patients who had bleeding
complications (BARC 1: 4/6, BARC 2: 2/6). These were
numerically higher in the older age groups, that is, 28.6% (2/7
in octogenarians), 15.4% (4/26, septuagenarians), and 0.0%
(0/17, <70 years).
4
|
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge this is the largest study in an octogenarian all-comer
population treated with a polymer-free DES technology. Albeit the fact
that previously detected cardiovascular risk factors and lesion
morphological characteristics such as the previously reported higher
rates of LAD stenting in octogenarians
3
were confirmed in our series;
some outcomes of this study have not been reported to our
knowledge.
TABLE 1 Patient demographics
Variable <70 years 70-79 years 80 years P-value
Number of patients 1607 694 371 -
Number of lesions 1808 1024 422 -
Number of DES used 2115 1244 499 -
Age (years) 58.7 ± 7.5 74.6 ± 2.7 83.3 ± 2.8 -
Male gender 1310 (81.5%) 599 (66.6%) 217 (58.5%) <0.001
Diabetes 592 (36.8%) 355 (39.5%) 143 (38.5%) 0.407
Hypertension 1062 (66.1%) 735 (81.8%) 310 (83.6%) <0.001
Renal insufficiency 59 (3.7%) 54 (6.0%) 48 (12.9%) <0.001
Dialysis dependence 31 (1.9%) 9 (1.0%) 8 (2.2%) 0.162
Hemodialysis 18 (1.1%) 7 (0.8%) 6 (1.6%) 0.266
Peritoneal dialysis 13 (0.8%) 2 (0.2%) 2 (0.5%)
STEMI 315 (19.6%) 106 (11.8%) 51 (13.7%) <0.001
NSTEMI 337 (21.0%) 178 (19.8%) 97 (26.1%)
Region
Europe 1025 (63.8%) 694 (77.2%) 306 (82.5%) <0.001
Asia 582 (36.2%) 205 (22.8%) 65 (17.5%)
340
|
KHERAD ET AL.
4.1
|
Target lesion revascularization
First of all, we could not detecta difference in TLR across our agegroups
(P= 0.080). Yazji et al
3
reported a 12-month TLR rate of 3.7%which was
higher as compared to patients <80 years of age (P= 0.005). Our
9-month TLR rate was in the same range (3.1%), however, this rate was
not different from the TLR rate in the 70-79 year age group (3.0%).This
finding may have been favored by a lack of power, nonetheless, the
accumulatedST rates were all quite similar (P= 0.970) across age groups,
that is, 0.7% (<70 years), 0.6% (septuagenarians), and 0.6% (octoge-
narians). This finding has to be evaluated together with the DAPT
duration which was significantly longer in the octogenarian subgroup.
Taken together, this may suggest that the polymer-free DES we used in
this study can be safely used with low ST rates and acceptably low TLR
and MACE rates. In addition, bleeding episodes were more frequent in
octogenarians which is in agreement with the current literature.
15
4.2
|
Cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis
A careful comparison to other studies such as the report by
Lopéz-Palop et al reveals that our all-cause death rate of 4.4% in
octogenarians appears to be substantially lower as those reported by
Lopéz-Palop et al
15
(18.0% in DES, 19.0% in BMS) whereas the
confirmed rates of ST are also higher (5.6% in DES, 3.5% in BMS) as
compared to our findings (0.7% in octogenarians). The outcomes of an
observational study conducted by Thomas et al
16
reported mortality
TABLE 2 Lesion characteristics and procedural data
Variable <70 years 70-79 years 80 years P-value
Number of lesions 1808 1024 422 -
Target vessel
LAD 771 (42.6%) 416 (40.6%) 187 (44.3%) 0.009
CX 496 (27.4%) 273 (26.7%) 97 (23.0%)
RCA 534 (29.5%) 319 (31.2%) 131 (31.0%)
Graft 7 (0.4%) 16 (1.6%) 7 (1.7%)
Multi-vessel disease
1-vessel 1589 (87.9%) 879 (85.9%) 362 (85.8%) 0.015
2-vessel 197 (10.7%) 136 (13.3%) 48 (11.4%)
3-vessel 25 (1.4%) 9 (0.9%) 12 (2.8%)
Thrombotic occlusion 225 (12.4%) 113 (11.0%) 35 (8.3%) 0.048
Chronic total occlusion 71 (3.9%) 46 (4.5%) 10 (2.4%) 0.166
Thrombus burden 293 (16.2%) 127 (12.4%) 42 (10.0%) 0.001
Diffuse vessel disease 757 (41.9%) 537 (52.4%) 226 (53.6%) <0.001
Calcification 454 (25.1%) 399 (39.0%) 167 (39.6%) <0.001
Ostial lesion 154 (8.5%) 110 (10.7%) 53 (12.6%) 0.018
Bifurcations 265 (14.7%) 132 (12.9%) 50 (11.8%) 0.204
In-stent restenosis 51 (2.8%) 36 (3.5%) 21 (5.0%) 0.077
Severe tortuosity 156 (8.6%) 127 (12.4%) 63 (14.9%) <0.001
Saphenous vein graft 9 (0.5%) 20 (2.0%) 8 (1.9%) 0.001
AHA/ACC type B2/C lesion 1009 (55.8%) 573 (56.0%) 237 (56.2%) 0.990
Reference diameter (mm) 2.85 ± 0.50 2.82 ± 0.52 2.79 ± ±0.50 0.126
Lesion length 18.5 ± 9.6 20.2 ± 13.2 20.4 ± 11.9 0.009
Degree of stenosis (%) 87.1 ± 11.0 87.1 ± 11.0 85.7 ± 11.4 0.070
Predilation 644 (35.6%) 386 (37.7%) 187 (44.3%) 0.004
DESs used 2115 1244 499 -
DES per patient 1.30 ± 0.70 1.38 ± 0.83 1.34 ± 0.79 0.039
DES diameter (mm) 2.85 ± 0.48 2.81 ± 0.50 2.81 ± 0.49 0.062
DES length (mm) 22.0 ± 9.7 21.6 ± 10.5 21.9 ± 9.7 0.547
DES inflation pressure (atm) 13.8 ± 3.0 14.1 ± 3.1 14.4 ± 3.0 0.003
Final result % stenosis 1.4 ± 4.7 1.9± 7.9 1.3 ± 4.4 0.094
Overall technical success per stent 2082 (98.4%) 1220 (98.1%) 488 (97.8%) 0.532
KHERAD ET AL.
|
341
rates for patients 80 years and older in the 12-15% range which is also
substantially higher as compared to our outcomes. In this context one
needs to be prudent to draw quick conclusions since confirmed ST
events may be more difficult to obtain in older patients unless
revascularizations can be done in due time.
Most patients who passed away prematurely had BARC 1
bleeding episodes while severe bleeding (BARC 3) occurred in
relatively small subgroups. However, in octogenarians who passed
away, there were two BARC 3a episodes versus none in the younger
subgroups (14.3% vs 0.0% vs 0.0%). As previously mentioned, the
use of anti-coagulants was more frequent in older patients.
Therefore, it can be suspected that the higher bleeding rates are
more likely to be an outcome of the increased use of anti-coagulants
which is not primarily related to age.
4.3
|
Antiplatelet and triple therapy
We found that prasugrel usage amounted to 15.3% in the octogenarian
subgroup despite the fact that this thienopyridine has an age cut-off of
75 years. However, we suspect that prasugrel was given in 5 mg per
day dosages in some centers despite the established indications
specified by the drug manufacturer.
There were 54 patients who were on triple therapy. Of these,
there were 50 patients with 9-month follow-up. The corresponding
MACE rate was low (2.0%), nevertheless, older patients in this
subgroup had more bleeding events. In triple therapy patients older
than 70 years, the bleeding rate in this study was in the 15-28% range
versus 0.0% in the sub-septuagenarian age group. This, however, is
also in agreement with recent findings by Bavishi et al
17
who
conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies.
TABLE 3 Peri-procedural drug therapy
Drug type Drug <70 years 70-79 years 80 years P-value
Pre PCI
Antiplatelet therapy (APT) Clopidogrel 844 (52.5%) 463 (51.5%) 222 (59.8%) <0.001
Prasugrel 206 (12.8%) 99 (11.0%) 166 (15.3%)
Ticagrelor 228 (12.8%) 117 (13.0%) 23 (6.2%)
Ticlopidine 9 (0.6%) 5 (0.6%) 15 (1.3%)
Aspirin only 150 (9.3%) 124 (13.8%) 42 (11.3%)
No preloading 170 (10.6%) 91 (10.1%) 41 (11.1%)
Oral anti-coagulatives (OAC) All OAC 18 (1.1%) 26 (2.9%) 10 (2.7%) 0.003
Vitamin k antagonist (VKA) 12 (0.7%) 16 (1.8%) 5 (1.3%) 0.015
New oral anticoagulative (NOAC),
for example, rivaroxaban
6 (0.4%) 10 (1.1%) 5 (1.3%)
Post PCI
Antiplatelet therapy (APT) Clopidogrel 1040 (64.7%) 656 (73.0%) 314 (84.6%) <0.001
Prasugrel 231 (14.4%) 65 (7.2%) 4 (1.1%)
Ticagrelor 300 (18.7%) 158 (17.6%) 43 (11.6%)
Aspirin only 16 (1.0%) 7 (0.8%) 5 (1.3%)
Unknown 20 (1.2%) 13 (1.4%) 3 (1.3%)
TABLE 4 Recommended duration of dual antiplatelet therapy during follow-up
Variable < 70 years 70-79 years 80 years P-value
Number of patients 1607 694 371 -
DAPT duration in months 10.5 ± 2.5 9.8 ± 2.9 9.5 ± 3.2 <0.001
1 month 8 (0.5%) 9 (1.0%) 7 (1.9%) <0.001
1-3 months 13 (0.8%) 8 (0.9%) 13 (3.5%)
3-6 months 4 (0.2%) 6 (0.7%) 2 (0.5%)
6 months 223 (13.9%) 169 (21.8%) 84 (22.6%)
>6-12 months 164 (10.2%) 85 (9.5%) 33 (8.9%)
12 months 914 (56.9%) 443 (49.3%) 167 (45.0%)
>12 months 4 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.3%)
Unknown status 277 (17.2%) 152 (16.9%) 64 (17.3%)
342
|
KHERAD ET AL.
4.4
|
Study limitations
The findings in this study provide guidance, however, the statistical
basis is descriptive in nature. Randomized controlled trials or
propensity score matching, even though desirable, would be
extremely challenging to conduct so that bias introducing factors
canbeeliminated.Moredataonother demographic risk factors
such as the smoking status would have been desirable as well but
were not assessed to facilitate data entry. Unfortunately, we did
not a priori assess the vascular access site (femoral vs radial) which
would have been very helpful to discuss bleeding events in the
BARC 2 category.
FIGURE 1 Kaplan-Meier curve freedom from MACE in various age groups
TABLE 5 Clinical outcomes
Variable < 70 years 70-79 years 80 years P-value
Number of patients 1603 899 371 -
Patients with clinical follow-up at 9 months or early event 1404 (87.4%) 789 (87.8%) 320 (86.3%) 0.762
Follow-up time (months) 8.7 ± 2.1 8.6 ± 2.1 8.3 ± 2.3 0.045
Time to discharge (days) 3.3 ± 11.8 4.0 ± 13.4 4.8 ± 20.0 0.127
In-hospital MACE 18 (1.3%) 13 (1.6%) 10 (3.1%) 0.063
In-hospital TLR 6 (0.4%) 4 (0.5%) 4 (1.3%) 0.198
In-hospital MI 15 (1.1%) 5 (0.6%) 5 (1.6%) 0.338
In-hospital cardiac death 5 (0.4%) 8 (1.0%) 4 (1.3%) 0.080
9-month MACE 42 (3.0%) 42 (5.3%) 23 (7.2%) 0.001
9-month TLR (Re-PCI, CABG) 24 (1.7%) 24 (3.0%) 10 (3.1%) 0.080
9-month MI 30 (2.1%) 17 (2.2%) 11 (3.4%) 0.354
9-month death all causes 9 (0.6%) 15 (1.9%) 14 (4.4%) <0.001
Bleeding complications
BARC 1-5 31 (1.9%) 24 (2.7%) 17 (4.6%) 0.012
BARC 2-5 13 (0.8%) 6 (0.7%) 11 (3.0%) <0.001
BARC 3-5 5 (0.3%) 3 (0.3%) 7 (1.9%) <0.001
Unknown BARC 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.2%) 1 (0.3%) 0.452
9-month accumulated definite/probable stent thrombosis 10 (0.7%) 5 (0.6%) 2 (0.6%) 0.970
Acute stent thrombosis, 24 6 (0.4%) 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.6%) 0.497
Subacute stent thrombosis,1-30 days 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Late stent thrombosis, 30 days 4 (0.3%) 3 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%)
KHERAD ET AL.
|
343
5
|
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first report on age groups and their clinical expectations
after polymer-free stenting with sirolimus-coated DES within the
framework of a large all-comer study. PF-SES seem safe and effective
in octogenarians with very favorable TLR and ST rates similar to those
in younger patient groups.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We like to acknowledge Dr. Birgit Blaich (Klinikum Esslingen/
Germany), Hervé Faltot (Hôpital Albert Schweitzer, Colmar/France),
and Ms Ramona Kranefuss (Südharz Klinikum Nordhausen/Germany)
for their help in conducting this study. In addition, the regulatory and
logistic support to conduct this study would not have been possible
without the dedicated help of the following Medical Affairs Team
members: Denny Herberger (Germany), Dr. Ghislaine Martin and Ms.
Aude Michaud (France), Dr. Ricard Rosique (Spain), Ms. Zoey Hooi
(Malaysia), and Ms. Yoonmi Lee (South Korea).
6
|
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Except for FK (lecturing fees) and MW (full time employment at
Medical Scientific Affairs, B.Braun Melsungen AG) there are no
conflicts of interest to declare.
ORCID
Behrouz Kherad http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-6646
Matthias Waliszewski http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8689-4505
REFERENCES
1. US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/population/projections/
data/national/2014/summarytables.html, accessed March 31, 2017.
2. Gayed M, Yadak N, Qamhia W, et al. Comorbidities and complications in
nonagenarians undergoing Coronary angiography and intervention. Int
Heart J. 2017;58:180184.
3. Yazji K, Abdul F, Elangovan S, et al. Comparison of the effects of
incomplete revascularization on 12-month mortality in patients <80
compared with 80 years who underwent percutaneous Coronary
intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:11641170.
4. Ramirez Guijarro C, Calero S, Barrionuevo MI, et al. Are very elderly
patients the same compared to the young elderly when acute coronary
syndrome? Eur Heart J. 2016;5:7879.
5. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. ESC focused update on dual
antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collabo-
ration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in
coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC)
and of the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS).
Eur Heart J. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419
6. Massberg S, Byrne RA, Kastrati A, et al. Intracoronary stenting and
angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting
versus zotarolimus-elutingstents (ISAR-TEST 5) investigators.Polymer-
free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotaroli-
mus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the intracoronary
stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and
probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.
Circulation. 2011;124:624632.
7. Kufner S, Sorges J, Mehilli J, et al. ISAR-TEST-5 investigators ISAR-TEST-5
investigators. Randomized trial of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-
eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents: 5-year
results of the ISAR-TEST-5 trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:784792.
8. Harada Y, Colleran R, Kufner S, et al. Intracoronary stenting and
angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol- and
zotarolimus-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST 5) investigators. Five-year clinical
outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free
sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotar-
olimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus-
and probucol- and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST 5) investigators.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:124.
9. Colleran R, Kufner S, Harada Y, et al. Intracoronary stenting and
angiographic results: test eficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting
versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST 5) investigators. Five-
year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents
versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients present-
ing with st-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2017;89:367374.
10. Krackhardt F, Kočka V, Waliszewski MW, et al. Polymer-free
sirolimus-eluting stents in a large-scale all-comers population. Open
Heart. 2017;4:e000592.
11. Cutlip D, Windecker S, Mehran R. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials:
a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:23442351.
12. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions
for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding
academic research consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:27362747.
13. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on
myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascu-
larization of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the
European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) developed
with the special contribution of the European association of
percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J.
2014;35:25412619.
14. Leschke M, Waliszewski M, Pons M, et al. The use of thin strut bare
metal stents in patients with atrial fibrillation: is there still a need for
BMS? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:358366.
15. López-PalopR,CarrilloP,FrutosA,etal.Safetyandefficacyofcoronary
drug-eluting stents in octogenarians. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62:12501259.
16. Thomas MP, Moscucci M, Smith DE, et al. Blue cross blue shield of
Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium. Outcome of contemporary
percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly and the very elderly:
insights from the blue cross blue shield of Michigan Cardiovascular
Consortium. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34:549554.
17. Bavishi C, Koulova A, Bangalore S, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and
safety of dual antiplatelet therapy with or without warfarin in patients
with a clinical indication for DAPT and chronic anticoagulation: a
meta-analysis of observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
2016;88:E12E22.
How to cite this article: Kherad B, Waliszewski M, Leschke
M, et al. 9-month results of polymer-free sirolimus eluting
stents in young patients compared to a septuagenarian and
octogenarian all-comer population. J Interven Cardiol.
2018;31:338344. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12472
344
|
KHERAD ET AL.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a polymer-free sirolimus coated, ultrathin strut drug-eluting stent (PF-SES) in an unselected patient population with a focus on acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with short (≤6 months) versus long (>6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were also studied. Methods Patients who received PF-SES were investigated in an unselected large-scale international, single-armed, multicenter, ‘all comers’ observational study. The primary endpoint was the 9-month target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and procedural success rates. A priori defined subgroups such as patients with ACS, diabetes, lesion subsets and procedural characteristics relative to DAPT were investigated. Results A total of 2877 patients of whom 1084 had ACS were treated with PF-SES (1.31±0.75 stents per patient). At 9 months, the accumulated overall TLR rate was 2.3% (58/2513). There was no significant difference between ACS and stable CAD (2.6% vs 2.1%, p=0.389). However, the overall MACE rate was 4.3% (108/2513) with a higher rate in patients with ACS when compared with the stable CAD subgroup (6.1%, 58/947 vs 3.2%, 50/1566, p<0.001). Conclusions PF-SES angioplasty is safe and effective in the daily clinical routine with low rates of TLR and MACE in an unselected patient population. Our data are in agreement with prior clinical findings that extended DAPT duration beyond 6 months do not improve clinical outcomes in patients with stable CAD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000592
Article
Full-text available
Elderly people represent the fastest growing portion of cardiovascular patients. We aimed to analyze the clinical presentation, risk factors, co-morbidities, complications, and mortality in patients 90 years or more who underwent coronary angiography and intervention. We retrospectively studied 108 (0.25% of 43,385) consecutive patients ≥ 90 years undergoing cardiac catheterization and/or intervention in a tertiary specialist hospital between 2003 and 2014. Most patients (68.5%) were introduced on an emergency basis, especially with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (63.8%). Non-STEMI accounted for two-thirds of the myocardial infarctions. We found higher prevalences of previous coronary artery disease (CAD) (38%), other atherosclerotic diseases (20.4%), cardiac risk factors such as hypertension (84.3%), diabetes (49.1%), hyperlipidemia (50.9%), heart failure (42.6%), atrial fibrillation (AF) (25.0%), severe aortic stenosis (13.0%), severe mitral regurgitation (3.7%), and implantable devices (25.0%), and co-morbidities such as renal impairment (48.1%), COPD (12.0%), and previous stroke (6.5%). Three-vessel disease was present in 34.6% of the patients. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) was the most affected coronary artery (67.6%). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mostly with bare metal stents (BMS), was used to manage 54.6% of the patients, and it failed in 4 of the patients. Conservative treatment was used in 39.8% of the patients and 15.7% had no significant CAD. The incidences of vascular complications, such as bleeding (6.5%), bleeding in other organs (6.5%), blood transfusion (6.5%), in-hospital paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (7.4%), in-hospital successful reanimation (2.8%), complete heart block (5.6%), acute renal impairment (23.1%), associated infection (25.9%), cardiogenic shock (14.8%), and death (15.7%) were high. Considering the more extensive risk factors, CAD and co-morbidities, acute presentation and age per se, we believe that the reported higher rates of complications and mortality are still acceptable.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial. Methods: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76-1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63-1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40-1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72-1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41-2.52). Conclusions: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008.
Article
Objectives: To evaluate the 9-month safety and efficacy of polymer-free sirolimus eluting drug eluting stents in septuagenarians and octogenarians. Methods: An all-comer, worldwide single armed trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575) was conducted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of an ultra-thin strut, polymer-free sirolimus eluting stent (PF-SES). The primary endpoint was the 9-month target revascularization rate (TLR). Secondary endpoints included the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stent thrombosis (ST) and bleeding (BARC) in septuagenarians (≥70 years, <80 years), and in octogenarians (≥80 years) to be compared to the younger patient group (<70 years). Results: A total of 1607 patients were treated with PF-SES in the sub-70-year-old age group, 694 in septuagenarians, and 371 in the octogenarian patient group. At 9 months, the MACE rates were 7.2% in octogenarians, 5.3% in septuagenarians, and 3.0% in the younger patient group (P = 0.001). These were mostly driven by all-cause mortality (4.4% vs 1.9% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001) while the TLR rates were only numerically lower in the younger age group (P = 0.080). BARC 1-5 bleeding events were more frequent in the older age group (1.9% vs 2.7% vs 4.6%, P = 0.012) whereas the rates for ST were not different (0.7% vs 0.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.970). Conclusions: In octogenarians treated with PF-SES, the rates for MACE, overall mortality, and bleeding are higher as compared to the younger age groups. However, the rates for TLR and ST were not significantly different across the investigated age groups. PF-SES are safe and effective in octogenarians.
Article
Although randomised trial data suggest that complete revascularisation improves outcomes after PCI the impact of differing revascularisation strategies in octogenarians is not well defined. We performed a retrospective analysis was conducted of 9,628 consecutive patients who underwent PCI at a large UK centre. Octogenarians were more likely to have significant comorbidity, a higher Mehran bleed risk score (24.5±6.8 vs. 13.3±7.4, p<0.0001), and more complex disease (baseline SYNTAX score 18.7±11.0 vs. 13.1±8.9, p=0.002) than younger patients. During PCI, octogenarians were more likely to undergo left main or proximal LAD intervention, but despite this, significantly less likely to receive drug-eluting stents (66.5 vs. 80.1%, p<0.001). Post-procedurally, octogenarians had greater residual disease burden (residual SYNTAX score 10.1±8.7 vs. 1.6±3.3, p<0.0001). At 12-months adverse outcomes (definite stent thrombosis 3.3 vs. 1.1%, p<0.001, clinically driven ISRS-PCI 3.7 vs. 2.6%, p=0.005, and 12-month mortality 12.8 vs. 4.2%, p<0.0001) were all more frequent in octogenarians. Although age, shock, diabetes and BMS use were independently predictive of increased 12-month mortality, incomplete revascularisation was not. In conclusion, octogenarians are a complex group to treat balancing high-risk bleeding profile and complex coronary disease. However, in multi-variate analysis incomplete revascularisation was not independently predictive of adverse outcomes. These data support a conservative target-lesion-only DES-driven revascularisation strategy.
Article
Background: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are at increased risk of late adverse events, partly explained by an exaggerated inflammatory reaction to durable-polymer stent coatings. Objectives: We sought to investigate whether implantation of polymer-free DES would reduce this risk. Methods: In the ISAR-TEST 5 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a new generation durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. We analyzed late clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients presenting with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization at 5 years. Results: 311 patients with STEMI were randomized to receive sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 215) or zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 96). At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint in patients treated with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (18.3% versus 20.1% respectively, hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.51; P = 0.62). Rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 1.4% versus 1.0% respectively (hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% CI, 0.14-12.94, P = 0.80). Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents were similar. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with no events beyond 12 months. Clinical trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT 00598533) © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the late clinical performance of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent compared with a new-generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent. Background: It was previously shown that polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents were noninferior to zotarolimus-eluting stents at 12 months. However, long-term follow-up of these devices is critical to evaluate late comparative efficacy. Methods: In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, 3,002 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Results: At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint between sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents and zotarolimus-eluting stents (23.8% vs. 24.2%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 1.15; p = 0.80). The rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.3% vs. 1.6%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 1.62; p = 0.64). The rates of any death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization were similar in both groups. Results were consistent across pre-specified subgroups of age, sex, diabetes, and vessel size. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of patients treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents compared with a new-generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent were similar. Rates of stent thrombosis were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with few events beyond 12 months. (Efficacy Study of Rapamycin- vs. Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents to Reduce Coronary Restenosis [ISAR-TEST-5]; NCT00598533).