ArticlePublisher preview available

Path-dependent reductions in CO2 emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release

Springer Nature
Nature Geoscience
Authors:
T. Gasser
T. Gasser
T. Gasser
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
M. Kechiar
M. Kechiar
M. Kechiar
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
P. Ciais
P. Ciais
P. Ciais
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Eleanor J. Burke at Met Office
Eleanor J. Burke
Show all 9 authorsHide
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Emission budgets are defined as the cumulative amount of anthropogenic CO2 emission compatible with a global temperature-change target. The simplicity of the concept has made it attractive to policy-makers, yet it relies on a linear approximation of the global carbon–climate system’s response to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Here we investigate how emission budgets are impacted by the inclusion of CO2 and CH4 emissions caused by permafrost thaw, a non-linear and tipping process of the Earth system. We use the compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2.1, in which parameterizations of permafrost thaw, soil organic matter decomposition and CO2 and CH4 emission were introduced based on four complex land surface models that specifically represent high-latitude processes. We found that permafrost carbon release makes emission budgets path dependent (that is, budgets also depend on the pathway followed to reach the target). The median remaining budget for the 2 °C target reduces by 8% (1–25%) if the target is avoided and net negative emissions prove feasible, by 13% (2–34%) if they do not prove feasible, by 16% (3–44%) if the target is overshot by 0.5 °C and by 25% (5–63%) if it is overshot by 1 °C. (Uncertainties are the minimum-to-maximum range across the permafrost models and scenarios.) For the 1.5 °C target, reductions in the median remaining budget range from ~10% to more than 100%. We conclude that the world is closer to exceeding the budget for the long-term target of the Paris Climate Agreement than previously thought. © 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Illustration of the three budget-calculation approaches used in this study Exceedance budgets (red) are the amount of CO2 that can be emitted before exceeding a given temperature target. Avoidance budgets (blue) are the amount of CO2 that can be emitted while staying below the target. Capture budgets (yellow) are the amount of CO2 that needs be captured when the target temperature is overshot by a given level. Capture budgets are combined with avoidance budgets to give the net overshoot budgets. Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1 give technical details on how these budgets are calculated. texc is the time at which the target is exceeded (for exceedance budgets), tavo is when temperature peaks at the targeted level (for avoidance budgets), tpeak is when temperature peaks at a given overshooting level above the targeted level (for overshoot budgets) and tcap is when temperature returns below the targeted level (for capture budgets and hence also overshoot budgets).
Illustration of the three budget-calculation approaches used in this study Exceedance budgets (red) are the amount of CO2 that can be emitted before exceeding a given temperature target. Avoidance budgets (blue) are the amount of CO2 that can be emitted while staying below the target. Capture budgets (yellow) are the amount of CO2 that needs be captured when the target temperature is overshot by a given level. Capture budgets are combined with avoidance budgets to give the net overshoot budgets. Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1 give technical details on how these budgets are calculated. texc is the time at which the target is exceeded (for exceedance budgets), tavo is when temperature peaks at the targeted level (for avoidance budgets), tpeak is when temperature peaks at a given overshooting level above the targeted level (for overshoot budgets) and tcap is when temperature returns below the targeted level (for capture budgets and hence also overshoot budgets).
… 
Change in emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release The different budget-calculation approaches include different levels of overshoot and the avoidance budgets based on two subgroups of scenarios: NetNegEm0 and NetNegEm+. The uncertainty bars show the full range and the symbols show the average, across all permafrost models and scenarios. a, Absolute reductions in emission budgets. b, Relative reductions in the remaining budgets, calculated by assuming 2,240 Gt CO2 (ref. ⁴⁴) was emitted between 1870 (the preindustrial reference year) and 2017 (Methods). To better isolate the effect of permafrost carbon in b, we present values under a constant present-day non-CO2 radiative forcing (other non-CO2 backgrounds are available in Supplementary Table 1). The grey hashed area represents a permafrost-induced reduction of 100% or more, which would imply that the budget was already exceeded in 2017.
Change in emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release The different budget-calculation approaches include different levels of overshoot and the avoidance budgets based on two subgroups of scenarios: NetNegEm0 and NetNegEm+. The uncertainty bars show the full range and the symbols show the average, across all permafrost models and scenarios. a, Absolute reductions in emission budgets. b, Relative reductions in the remaining budgets, calculated by assuming 2,240 Gt CO2 (ref. ⁴⁴) was emitted between 1870 (the preindustrial reference year) and 2017 (Methods). To better isolate the effect of permafrost carbon in b, we present values under a constant present-day non-CO2 radiative forcing (other non-CO2 backgrounds are available in Supplementary Table 1). The grey hashed area represents a permafrost-induced reduction of 100% or more, which would imply that the budget was already exceeded in 2017.
… 
Path dependency of the permafrost-induced budget reductions Reductions in avoidance and overshoot budgets are compared to reductions in exceedance budgets (reference case of 100%). Each type of budget represents a different archetype of pathway, and they are roughly sorted by the increasing intensity of the permafrost effect. The uncertainty bars show the full range of our results. Values >100% mean that the emission budgets are more largely reduced than in the exceedance case. If the permafrost effect was path independent, all the points would be close to 100%.
Path dependency of the permafrost-induced budget reductions Reductions in avoidance and overshoot budgets are compared to reductions in exceedance budgets (reference case of 100%). Each type of budget represents a different archetype of pathway, and they are roughly sorted by the increasing intensity of the permafrost effect. The uncertainty bars show the full range of our results. Values >100% mean that the emission budgets are more largely reduced than in the exceedance case. If the permafrost effect was path independent, all the points would be close to 100%.
… 
Contribution of CH4 released by permafrost thaw to the budget reductions a,b, Absolute (a) and relative (b) terms with regard to the values shown in Fig. 2a. Uncertainty bars show the full range and symbols show the average, across all permafrost models and scenarios.
Contribution of CH4 released by permafrost thaw to the budget reductions a,b, Absolute (a) and relative (b) terms with regard to the values shown in Fig. 2a. Uncertainty bars show the full range and symbols show the average, across all permafrost models and scenarios.
… 
Figures - available from: Nature Geoscience
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Learn more
Content available from Nature Geoscience 
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Articles
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0227-0
1International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. 2École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France. 3Laboratoire des Sciences du
Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA – CNRS – UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 4Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.
5Max Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany. 6Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
7Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. *e-mail: gasser@iiasa.ac.at
Sometimes called ‘carbon budgets’, cumulative anthropogenic
CO2 emission budgets compatible with a given global mean
warming target have been evaluated in many ways1–10. Yet, only
a handful of the studies11–13 made (incomplete) preliminary attempts
to account for permafrost thaw. The additional emission of CO2 and
CH4 caused by this natural process triggered by warming in the high
latitudes13,14 will diminish the budget of CO2 humankind can emit
to keep below a certain level of global warming. Permafrost carbon
release is also an irreversible process over the course of a few centu-
ries13,14, and may thus be considered a ‘tipping’ element of the Earth’s
carbon–climate system15, which puts the linear approximation of
the emission budget framework1,4,5,16,17 to the test.
To quantify the impact of permafrost carbon release on emission
budgets, we use an Earth system model of reduced complexity whose
processes are parameterized to faithfully emulate more complex
models. OSCAR v2.2.1 (a minor update of v2.2 (ref. 18)) was run in its
default configuration, which is comparable to the median of its prob-
abilistic set-up. Therefore, all our results are for about a 50% chance
of meeting the temperature targets. OSCAR is extended here with a
new permafrost carbon module that emulates four state-of-the-art
land surface models: JSBACH (Methods), ORCHIDEE-MICT
(ref. 19), and two versions of JULES (refs 20,21). These complex models
were developed specifically to represent high-latitude processes, in
particular soil thermic and biogeochemistry mechanisms that con-
trol carbon sequestration and emission. In this new emulator, the
permafrost carbon in two high-latitude regions is represented as
an initially frozen pool that thaws as global temperature increases.
Thawed carbon is not immediately emitted: it is split between several
pools, each with its specific timescale of emission. We assume that
2.3% of the emission occurs as methane14 (Methods discusses the
uncertainty of this value), and this emitted CH4 is fully coupled to
the dynamical atmospheric chemistry of OSCAR. More details on
the protocol, the emulator and the models are provided in Methods.
We do not assume a priori that reductions in emission bud-
gets can simply be calculated as the cumulative permafrost carbon
release in a given scenario. Quite the opposite, we apply three spe-
cifically designed approaches to estimate emission budgets. The first
one is the ‘exceedance’ approach, in which the budget is a thresh-
old in terms of cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions above
which the temperature target is exceeded (with a given probability).
The second one is the ‘avoidance’ approach, in which the budget is
another—typically lower—cumulative emissions threshold below
which the target is avoided (also with a given probability). These two
approaches were used in the fifth International Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) assessment report6,22. However, neither of these
considers the possibility of overshooting the target first, and then
returning below it afterwards. To investigate such a case, we adapted
the approach of MacDougall et al.12 to create ‘overshoot’ budgets.
Reductions in exceedance and avoidance budgets. With the
exceedance approach, budgets are calculated in any given scenario
as the maximum cumulative CO2 emissions before the point in
time when global temperature reaches the target level for the first
time. This is illustrated in Fig. 1 (Methods and example given in
Supplementary Fig. 1). Here our exceedance budgets are based on
the four extended representative concentration pathways (RCP)
emission scenarios23 and two idealized scenarios (Methods and
Supplementary Fig. 2).
When permafrost carbon is ignored, we estimated total exceed-
ance budgets of 2,350 (2,290–2,480) Gt CO2 for the 1.5 °C target and
Path-dependent reductions in CO2 emission
budgets caused by permafrost carbon release
T.Gasser 1*, M.Kechiar1,2, P.Ciais 3, E.J.Burke 4, T.Kleinen 5, D.Zhu 3, Y.Huang3,
A.Ekici6,7 and M.Obersteiner1
Emission budgets are defined as the cumulative amount of anthropogenic CO2 emission compatible with a global temperature-
change target. The simplicity of the concept has made it attractive to policy-makers, yet it relies on a linear approximation of
the global carbon–climate system’s response to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Here we investigate how emission budgets are
impacted by the inclusion of CO2 and CH4 emissions caused by permafrost thaw, a non-linear and tipping process of the Earth
system. We use the compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2.1, in which parameterizations of permafrost thaw, soil organic
matter decomposition and CO2 and CH4 emission were introduced based on four complex land surface models that specifically
represent high-latitude processes. We found that permafrost carbon release makes emission budgets path dependent (that is,
budgets also depend on the pathway followed to reach the target). The median remaining budget for the 2 °C target reduces by
8% (1–25%) if the target is avoided and net negative emissions prove feasible, by 13% (2–34%) if they do not prove feasible, by
16% (3–44%) if the target is overshot by 0.5 °C and by 25% (5–63%) if it is overshot by 1 °C. (Uncertainties are the minimum-
to-maximum range across the permafrost models and scenarios.) For the 1.5 °C target, reductions in the median remaining
budget range from ~10% to more than 100%. We conclude that the world is closer to exceeding the budget for the long-term
target of the Paris Climate Agreement than previously thought.
Corrected: Author Correction
NATURE GEOSCIENCE | VOL 11 | NOVEMBER 2018 | 830–835 | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience
830
The Nature trademark is a registered trademark of Springer Nature Limited.
... The release of permafrost carbon could have substantial implications for climate mitigation strategies and policies. It may lead to the depletion of remaining carbon budgets (Comyn-Platt et al., 2018;Gasser et al., 2018) and could jeopardize the achievement of global climate goals (Natali et al., 2021). The permafrost carbon release and its feedback • Efficacy of solar radiation modification in mitigating permafrost loss is contingent on warming trajectory and timing of intervention • Soil carbon within permafrost regions displays contrasting trends between the phases of overshoot and subsequent stabilization mechanisms are essential considerations for climate projections especially under anticipated emission trajectories (Schädel et al., 2024). ...
... Most permafrost carbon projections concentrate on responses to escalating future warming scenarios. Only a limited number of studies have considered overshoot scenarios (Bauer et al., 2023;Gasser et al., 2018). These scenarios involve intentionally reversing the global mean temperature to lower levels after temporarily surpassing the 1.5°C warming target (Seneviratne et al., 2018). ...
Permafrost Response in Northern High‐Latitude Regions to 1.5°C Warming and Overshoot Scenarios Achieved via Solar Radiation Modification
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
The thawing of carbon‐rich northern high‐latitude permafrost might unleash irreversible changes in the Earth's climate system. Previous studies have suggested that solar radiation modification (SRM) can significantly slow the degradation of permafrost, potentially restoring its extent and soil carbon stocks to levels comparable to those under equivalent global warming caused by greenhouse gas increases alone. However, this study identifies that the efficacy of SRM in mitigating permafrost degradation is contingent upon the warming trajectory and the timing of SRM intervention. Employing SRM to keep global warming at a maximum of 1.5°C can substantially reduce permafrost degradation; however, simulations suggest that by 2300, approximately half of the permafrost area reduction and one‐third of the carbon losses expected under the high‐emissions SSP5‐8.5 scenario would still take place. By employing SRM to achieve a return to 1.5°C warming stabilization levels after a temperature overshoot, it is possible to effectively restore the permafrost area. However, the lost permafrost carbon cannot be regained. Additionally, the soil carbon within permafrost regions displays contrasting trends between the phases of overshoot and subsequent stabilization. Our simulations show that achieving the 1.5°C warming target after a 4°C temperature overshoot could necessitate up to 7% increase in SRM application due to permafrost carbon release. Moreover, perturbed parameter ensemble simulations indicate that the key parameter influencing the uncertainty of soil carbon losses in permafrost regions under 1.5°C warming and overshoot scenarios is distinct from that under the SSP5‐8.5 scenario.
View
... Whether more elaborated approaches are required depends on the CID and needs to be assessed carefully. There are, however, simple modelling or emulator tools to explore time-lagged impacts that have been used to study sea-level rise or permafrost loss [34][35][36] . ...
View
... Nevertheless, the AERA approach would adjust allowable emissions in response to emerging, unforeseen feedbacks when applied to real-world emission and temperature data (Terhaar et al., 2022a). Additionally, most models in our study either neglect or poorly represent permafrost dynamics and often underestimate soil carbon stocks in the northern high latitudes Burke et al., 2017;Gasser et al., 2018;Lowe and Bernie, 2018;Burke et al., 2020;MacDougall, 2021). Permafrost thaw due to global warming has the potential to release a substantial amount of car-bon stored in soil for millennia into the atmosphere over a relatively short period (e.g. ...
AERA-MIP: emission pathways, remaining budgets, and carbon cycle dynamics compatible with 1.5 and 2 °C global warming stabilization
Article
Full-text available
While international climate policies now focus on limiting global warming to well below 2 °C or pursuing a 1.5 °C level of global warming, the climate modelling community has not provided an experimental design in which all Earth system models (ESMs) converge and stabilize at the same prescribed global warming levels. This gap hampers accurate estimations based on comprehensive ESMs of the carbon emission pathways and budgets needed to meet such agreed warming levels and of the associated climate impacts under temperature stabilization. Here, we apply the Adaptive Emission Reduction Approach (AERA) with ESMs to provide such simulations in which all models converge at 1.5 and 2.0 °C warming levels by adjusting their emissions over time. These emission-driven simulations provide a wide range of emission pathways and resulting atmospheric CO2 projections for a given warming level, uncovering uncertainty ranges that were previously missing in the traditional Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) scenarios with prescribed greenhouse gas concentration pathways. Meeting the 1.5 °C warming level requires a 40 % (full model range: 7 % to 76 %) reduction in multi-model mean CO2-forcing-equivalent (CO2-fe) emissions from 2025 to 2030, a 98 % (57 % to 127 %) reduction from 2025 to 2050, and a stabilization at 1.0 (-1.7 to 2.9) PgC yr⁻¹ from 2100 onward after the 1.5 °C global warming level is reached. Meeting the 2.0 °C warming level requires a 47 % (8 % to 92 %) reduction in multi-model mean CO2-fe emissions until 2050 and a stabilization at 1.7 (-1.5 to 2.7) PgC yr⁻¹ from 2100 onward. The on-average positive emissions under stabilized global temperatures are the result of a decreasing transient climate response to cumulative CO2-fe emissions over time under stabilized global warming. This evolution is consistent with a slightly negative zero emissions commitment – initially assumed to be zero – and leads to an increase in the post-2025 CO2-fe emission budget by a factor of 2.2 (-0.8 to 6.9) by 2150 for the 1.5 °C warming level and a factor of 1.4 (0.9 to 2.4) for the 2.0 °C warming level compared to its first estimate in 2025. The median CO2-only carbon budget by 2150, relative to 2020, is 800 GtCO2 for the 1.5 °C warming level and 2250 GtCO2 for the 2.0 °C warming level. These median values exceed the median IPCC AR6 estimates by 60 % for the 1.5 °C warming level and 67 % for 2.0 °C. Some of the differences may be explained by the choice of the mitigation scenario for non-CO2 radiative agents. Our simulations highlight shifts in carbon uptake dynamics under stabilized temperature, such as a cessation of the carbon sinks in the North Atlantic and in tropical forests. On the other hand, the Southern Ocean remains a carbon sink centuries after temperatures stabilize. Overall, this new type of warming-level-based emission-driven simulation offers a more coherent assessment across climate models and opens up a wide range of possibilities for studying both the carbon cycle and climate impacts, such as extreme events, under climate stabilization.
View
... Importantly, reliance on unproven atscale, or as-of-yet unavailable carbon removal technologies is reduced 61,62 . Additionally, accelerated action allows for the flexibility to adjust RCBs in response to emerging scientific findings 63 , including the potential impact of carbon cycle feedback on anthropogenic emissions 64,65 , and mitigates against the risk of a lack of action in other sectors, such as agriculture and land use. Finally, accelerated action helps overcome inertia in economic systems 63 , enabling learning and scale effects to unfold. ...
Implications of accelerated and delayed climate action for Ireland’s energy transition under carbon budgets
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2024
Limiting global warming requires the effective implementation of energy mitigation measures by individual countries. However, the consequences of the timing of these efforts on the technical feasibility of adhering to cumulative carbon budgets—which determines future global warming—are underexplored. Moreover, existing national studies on carbon budgets either overlook integrated sectoral interactions, path dependencies, or comprehensive demand-side strategies. To address this, we analyse Ireland’s mitigation pathways under equal per-capita carbon budgets using an energy systems optimisation model. Our findings reveal that delayed mitigation brings forward the need for a net-zero target by five years, risks carbon lock-in and stranded assets, increase reliance on carbon dioxide removal technologies and leads to higher long-term mitigation costs. To keep the Paris Agreement targets, countries must set and meet accelerated mid-term mitigation goals and address energy demand.
View
... Whether or not global temperature increase is indeed reversible strongly depends on the response of the climate system and the carbon cycle to a decisive reduction in radiative forcing (Schwinger and Tjiputra, 2018;Melnikova et al., 2021). Some feedbacks, such as permafrost melt, will continue over centuries even if warming is reversed following overshoot (Gasser et al., 2018;Asaadi et al., 2024). More generally, the response of natural emissions is highly uncertain and can also drive the evolution of several non-CO 2 climate forcers with consequences for biogeochemical climate feedbacks and health, threatening to counterbalance the air pollution control efforts in some places (Szopa et al., 2021). ...
A perspective on the next generation of Earth system model scenarios: towards representative emission pathways (REPs)
Article
Full-text available
In every Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment cycle, a multitude of scenarios are assessed, with different scope and emphasis throughout the various Working Group reports and special reports, as well as their respective chapters. Within the reports, the ambition is to integrate knowledge on possible climate futures across the Working Groups and scientific research domains based on a small set of “framing pathways” such as the so-called representative concentration pathways (RCPs) in the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5) and the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios in the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). This perspective, initiated by discussions at the IPCC Bangkok workshop in April 2023 on the “Use of Scenarios in AR6 and Subsequent Assessments”, is intended to serve as one of the community contributions to highlight the needs for the next generation of framing pathways that is being advanced under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) umbrella, which will influence or even predicate the IPCC AR7 consideration of framing pathways. Here we suggest several policy research objectives that such a set of framing pathways should ideally fulfil, including mitigation needs for meeting the Paris Agreement objectives, the risks associated with carbon removal strategies, the consequences of delay in enacting that mitigation, guidance for adaptation needs, loss and damage, and for achieving mitigation in the wider context of societal development goals. Based on this context, we suggest that the next generation of climate scenarios for Earth system models should evolve towards representative emission pathways (REPs) and suggest key categories for such pathways. These framing pathways should address the most critical mitigation policy and adaptation plans that need to be implemented over the next 10 years. In our view, the most important categories are those relevant in the context of the Paris Agreement long-term goal, specifically an immediate action (low overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway and a delayed action (high overshoot) 1.5 °C pathway. Two other key categories are a pathway category approximately in line with current (as expressed by 2023) near- and long-term policy objectives, as well as a higher-emission category that is approximately in line with “current policies” (as expressed by 2023). We also argue for the scientific and policy relevance in exploring two “worlds that could have been”. One of these categories has high-emission trajectories well above what is implied by current policies and the other has very-low-emission trajectories which assume that global mitigation action in line with limiting warming to 1.5 °C without overshoot had begun in 2015. Finally, we note that the timely provision of new scientific information on pathways is critical to inform the development and implementation of climate policy. Under the Paris Agreement, for the second global stocktake, which will occur in 2028, and to inform subsequent development of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) up to 2040, scientific inputs are required by 2027. These needs should be carefully considered in the development timeline of community modelling activities, including those under CMIP7.
View
... This uncertainty is sampled through a Monte Carlo approach with n = 2400 elements. The uncertainty in the natural processes governing the atmospheric concentration of CO2 and CH4 comes from the available parameterizations of OSCAR 46,97,98 . The uncertainty in the input radiative forcing follows that of the IPCC AR6 99 and is applied uniformly to the whole time series. ...
Systematic attribution of heatwaves to the emissions of carbon majors
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Jul 2024
Extreme event attribution assesses how anthropogenic climate change affected an extreme climate event, but typically focuses on individual events. Here, we systematize this approach, and apply it to 187 historical heatwaves reported over the period 2000-2022. We show that climate change has made all these heatwaves more likely and more intense. In particular, 33% of these heatwaves were virtually impossible without anthropogenic influence. Furthermore, this influence rises over time, both in intensity and in likelihood: climate change made the median heatwaves 24 times more likely over 2000-2009, 293 times more likely over 2010-2019 and 1355 times more likely over 2020-2022. We also extend the attribution to the contribution of emitters, by quantifying how much these heatwaves were affected by the emissions of 122 carbon majors (fossil fuel and cement producers), assessed through their full value chain. Our best estimate shows that, depending on the carbon major, between 28 and 62 heatwaves have been made 10,000 times more likely. Even small carbon majors enable heatwaves with their sole contribution.
View
Permafrost-wildfire interactions: Active layer thickness estimates for paired burned and unburned sites in northern high-latitudes
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
As the northern high latitude permafrost zone experiences accelerated warming, permafrost has become vulnerable to widespread thaw. Simultaneously, wildfire activity across northern boreal forest and Arctic/subarctic tundra regions impact permafrost stability through the combustion of insulating organic matter, vegetation and post-fire changes in albedo. Efforts to synthesise the impacts of wildfire on permafrost are limited and are typically reliant on antecedent pre-fire conditions. To address this, we created the FireALT dataset by soliciting data contributions that included thaw depth measurements, site conditions, and fire event details with paired measurements at environmentally comparable burned and unburned sites. The solicitation resulted in 52,466 thaw depth measurements from 18 contributors across North America and Russia. Because thaw depths were taken at various times throughout the thawing season, we also estimated end of season active layer thickness (ALT) for each measurement using a modified version of the Stefan equation. Here, we describe our methods for collecting and quality checking the data, estimating ALT, the data structure, strengths and limitations, and future research opportunities. The final dataset includes 47,952 ALT estimates (27,747 burned, 20,205 unburned) with 32 attributes. There are 193 unique paired burned/unburned sites spread across 12 ecozones that span Canada, Russia, and the United States. The data span fire events from 1900 to 2022. Time since fire ranges from zero to 114 years. The FireALT dataset addresses a key challenge: the ability to assess impacts of wildfire on ALT when measurements are taken at various times throughout the thaw season depending on the time of field campaigns (typically June through August) by estimating ALT at the end of season maximum. This dataset can be used to address understudied research areas particularly algorithm development, calibration, and validation for evolving process-based models as well as extrapolating across space and time, which could elucidate permafrost-wildfire interactions under accelerated warming across the high northern latitude permafrost zone. The FireALT dataset is available through the Arctic Data Center.
View
Permafrost in the climate system: Feedbacks, cycles, future trends, ecological and social implications
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
Permafrost, a key component of the cryosphere, covers approximately 15% of the Northern Hemisphere's land surface and stores around 1014 billion metric tons of carbon in surface frozen soils. It plays a vital role in the climate system through its interactions with the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. As climate warming accelerates, permafrost is undergoing considerable degradation globally, which is likely to release previously sequestered carbon. This process could have profound implications for permafrost carbon feedbacks to the climate, as well as for ecosystems and human communities. In this chapter, we outline the interactions of permafrost and climate system, provide a comprehensive review of permafrost carbon dynamics and feedback, summarize the future trends of permafrost and carbon release, and discuss the ecological and social implications of these changes, as well as future challenges.
View
View
View
View
Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 °C global warming
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2018
  • Nat. Clim. Change.
The Paris Agreement ¹ commits ratifying parties to pursue efforts to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial levels. Carbon budgets ²⁻⁵ consistent with remaining below 1.5 °C warming, reported in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) 2,6,8, are directly based on Earth system model (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) ⁷ responses, which, on average, warm more than observations in response to historical CO2 emissions and other forcings 8,9 . These models indicate a median remaining budget of 55 PgC (ref. ¹⁰, base period: year 1870) left to emit from January 2016, the equivalent to approximately five years of emissions at the 2015 rate 11,12 . Here we calculate warming and carbon budgets relative to the decade 2006-2015, which eliminates model-observation differences in the climate-carbon response over the historical period ⁹, and increases the median remaining carbon budget to 208 PgC (33-66% range of 130-255 PgC) from January 2016 (with mean warming of 0.89 °C for 2006-2015 relative to 1861-1880 ¹³⁻¹⁸ ). There is little sensitivity to the observational data set used to infer warming that has occurred, and no significant dependence on the choice of emissions scenario. Thus, although limiting median projected global warming to below 1.5 °C is undoubtedly challenging ¹⁹⁻²¹, our results indicate it is not impossible, as might be inferred from the IPCC AR5 carbon budgets 2,8 .
View
Global Carbon Budget 2017
Article
Full-text available
  • Mar 2018
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2007–2016), EFF was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1, ELUC 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr-1, GATM 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr-1, SOCEAN 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1, and SLAND 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr-1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.6 GtC yr-1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in EFF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1. Also for 2016, ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr-1, GATM was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr-1, SOCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr-1, and SLAND was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr-1, with a small BIM of -0.3 GtC. GATM continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the high fossil emissions and the small SLAND consistent with El Niño conditions. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in EFF of +2.0 % (range of 0.8 to 3.0 %) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of gross domestic product (GDP) corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from 10.18160/GCP-2017 (GCP, 2017).
View
Uncertainty in projected climate change arising from uncertain fossil-fuel emission factors
Article
Full-text available
Emission inventories are widely used by the climate community, but their uncertainties are rarely accounted for. In this study, we evaluate the uncertainty in projected climate change induced by uncertainties in fossil-fuel emissions, accounting for non-CO2 species co-emitted with the combustion of fossil-fuels and their use in industrial processes. Using consistent historical reconstructions and three contrasted future projections of fossil-fuel extraction from Mohr et al we calculate CO2 emissions and their uncertainties stemming from estimates of fuel carbon content, net calorific value and oxidation fraction. Our historical reconstructions of fossil-fuel CO2 emissions are consistent with other inventories in terms of average and range. The uncertainties sum up to a ±15% relative uncertainty in cumulative CO2 emissions by 2300. Uncertainties in the emissions of non-CO2 species associated with the use of fossil fuels are estimated using co-emission ratios varying with time. Using these inputs, we use the compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2 and a Monte Carlo setup, in order to attribute the uncertainty in projected global surface temperature change (∆T) to three sources of uncertainty, namely on the Earth system's response, on fossil-fuel CO2 emission and on non-CO2 co-emissions. Under the three future fuel extraction scenarios, we simulate the median ∆T to be 1.9, 2.7 or 4.0 °C in 2300, with an associated 90% confidence interval of about 65%, 52% and 42%. We show that virtually all of the total uncertainty is attributable to the uncertainty in the future Earth system's response to the anthropogenic perturbation. We conclude that the uncertainty in emission estimates can be neglected for global temperature projections in the face of the large uncertainty in the Earth system response to the forcing of emissions. We show that this result does not hold for all variables of the climate system, such as the atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and the radiative forcing of tropospheric ozone, that have an emissions-induced uncertainty representing more than 40% of the uncertainty in the Earth system's response.
View
CO2 loss by permafrost thawing implies additional emissions reductions to limit warming to 1.5 or 2 ◦C
Article
Full-text available
Large amounts of carbon are stored in the permafrost of the northern high latitude land. As permafrost degrades under a warming climate, some of this carbon will decompose and be released to the atmosphere. This positive climate-carbon feedback will reduce the natural carbon sinks and thus lower anthropogenic CO 2 emissions compatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Simulations using an ensemble of the JULES-IMOGEN intermediate complexity climate model (including climate response and process uncertainty) and a stabilization target of 2 • C, show that including the permafrost carbon pool in the model increases the land carbon emissions at stabilization by between 0.09 and 0.19 Gt C year −1 (10th to 90th percentile). These emissions are only slightly reduced to between 0.08 and 0.16 Gt C year −1 (10th to 90th percentile) when considering 1.5 • C stabilization targets. This suggests that uncertainties caused by the differences in stabilization target are small compared with those associated with model parameterisation uncertainty. Inertia means that permafrost carbon loss may continue for many years after anthropogenic emissions have stabilized. Simulations suggest that between 225 and 345 Gt C (10th to 90th percentile) are in thawed permafrost and may eventually be released to the atmosphere for stabilization target of 2 • C. This value is 60-100 Gt C less for a 1.5 • C target. The inclusion of permafrost carbon will add to the demands on negative emission technologies which are already present in most low emissions scenarios.
View
Pathways to 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming based on observational and geological constraints
Article
Full-text available
Restricting global warming to remain below agreed targets requires limiting carbon emissions, the principal driver of anthropogenic warming. However, there is significant uncertainty in projecting the amount of carbon that can be emitted, in part due to the limited number of Earth system model simulations and their discrepancies with present-day observations. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach to reduce the uncertainty of climate projections; using theory and geological evidence we generate a very large ensemble (3×104) of projections that closely match records for nine key climate metrics, including warming and ocean heat content. Our analysis narrows the uncertainty in surface warming projections and reduces the range in equilibrium climate sensitivity. We find that a warming target of 1.5°C above the preindustrial requires the total emitted carbon from the start of year 2017 to be less than 195 to 205 PgC (in over 66% of simulations), while a warming target of 2 °C is only likely if the emitted carbon remains less than 395 to 455 PgC. At current emission rates, these warming targets are reached in 17 to 18 years and 35 to 41 years, respectively, so that there is a limited window to develop a more carbon-efficient future.
View
Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C
Article
Full-text available
The Paris Agreement has opened debate on whether limiting warming to 1.5 °C is compatible with current emission pledges and warming of about 0.9 °C from the mid-nineteenth century to the present decade. We show that limiting cumulative post-2015 CO2 emissions to about 200 GtC would limit post-2015 warming to less than 0.6 °C in 66% of Earth system model members of the CMIP5 ensemble with no mitigation of other climate drivers, increasing to 240 GtC with ambitious non-CO2 mitigation. We combine a simple climate–carbon-cycle model with estimated ranges for key climate system properties from the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Assuming emissions peak and decline to below current levels by 2030, and continue thereafter on a much steeper decline, which would be historically unprecedented but consistent with a standard ambitious mitigation scenario (RCP2.6), results in a likely range of peak warming of 1.2–2.0 °C above the mid-nineteenth century. If CO2 emissions are continuously adjusted over time to limit 2100 warming to 1.5 °C, with ambitious non-CO2 mitigation, net future cumulative CO2 emissions are unlikely to prove less than 250 GtC and unlikely greater than 540 GtC. Hence, limiting warming to 1.5 °C is not yet a geophysical impossibility, but is likely to require delivery on strengthened pledges for 2030 followed by challengingly deep and rapid mitigation. Strengthening near-term emissions reductions would hedge against a high climate response or subsequent reduction rates proving economically, technically or politically unfeasible.
View
Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon–climate feedbacks
Article
Full-text available
  • Jun 2017
  • BG
The land surface models JULES (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator, two versions) and ORCHIDEE-MICT (Organizing Carbon and Hydrology in Dynamic Ecosystems), each with a revised representation of permafrost carbon, were coupled to the Integrated Model Of Global Effects of climatic aNomalies (IMOGEN) intermediate-complexity climate and ocean carbon uptake model. IMOGEN calculates atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and local monthly surface climate for a given emission scenario with the land–atmosphere CO2 flux exchange from either JULES or ORCHIDEE-MICT. These simulations include feedbacks associated with permafrost carbon changes in a warming world. Both IMOGEN–JULES and IMOGEN–ORCHIDEE-MICT were forced by historical and three alternative future-CO2-emission scenarios. Those simulations were performed for different climate sensitivities and regional climate change patterns based on 22 different Earth system models (ESMs) used for CMIP3 (phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project), allowing us to explore climate uncertainties in the context of permafrost carbon–climate feedbacks. Three future emission scenarios consistent with three representative concentration pathways were used: RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. Paired simulations with and without frozen carbon processes were required to quantify the impact of the permafrost carbon feedback on climate change. The additional warming from the permafrost carbon feedback is between 0.2 and 12 % of the change in the global mean temperature (ΔT) by the year 2100 and 0.5 and 17 % of ΔT by 2300, with these ranges reflecting differences in land surface models, climate models and emissions pathway. As a percentage of ΔT, the permafrost carbon feedback has a greater impact on the low-emissions scenario (RCP2.6) than on the higher-emissions scenarios, suggesting that permafrost carbon should be taken into account when evaluating scenarios of heavy mitigation and stabilization. Structural differences between the land surface models (particularly the representation of the soil carbon decomposition) are found to be a larger source of uncertainties than differences in the climate response. Inertia in the permafrost carbon system means that the permafrost carbon response depends on the temporal trajectory of warming as well as the absolute amount of warming. We propose a new policy-relevant metric – the frozen carbon residence time (FCRt) in years – that can be derived from these complex land surface models and used to quantify the permafrost carbon response given any pathway of global temperature change.
View
ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a land surface model for the high latitudes: model description and validation
Article
Full-text available
The high-latitude regions of the Northern Hemisphere are a nexus for the interaction between land surface physical properties and their exchange of carbon and energy with the atmosphere. At these latitudes, two carbon pools of planetary significance – those of the permanently frozen soils (permafrost), and of the great expanse of boreal forest – are vulnerable to destabilization in the face of currently observed climatic warming, the speed and intensity of which are expected to increase with time. Improved projections of future Arctic and boreal ecosystem transformation require improved land surface models that integrate processes specific to these cold biomes. To this end, this study lays out relevant new parameterizations in the ORCHIDEE-MICT land surface model. These describe the interactions between soil carbon, soil temperature and hydrology, and their resulting feedbacks on water and CO2 fluxes, in addition to a recently developed fire module. Outputs from ORCHIDEE-MICT, when forced by two climate input datasets, are extensively evaluated against (i) temperature gradients between the atmosphere and deep soils, (ii) the hydrological components comprising the water balance of the largest high-latitude basins, and (iii) CO2 flux and carbon stock observations. The model performance is good with respect to empirical data, despite a simulated excessive plant water stress and a positive land surface temperature bias. In addition, acute model sensitivity to the choice of input forcing data suggests that the calibration of model parameters is strongly forcing-dependent. Overall, we suggest that this new model design is at the forefront of current efforts to reliably estimate future perturbations to the high-latitude terrestrial environment.
View
Increased nitrous oxide emissions from Arctic peatlands after permafrost thaw
Article
Full-text available
  • May 2017
Significance The Arctic is warming rapidly, causing permafrost soils to thaw. Vast stocks of nitrogen (>67 billion tons) in the permafrost, accumulated thousands of years ago, could now become available for decomposition, leading to the release of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) to the atmosphere. N 2 O is a strong greenhouse gas, almost 300 times more powerful than CO 2 for warming the climate. Although carbon dynamics in the Arctic are well studied, the fact that Arctic soils store enormous amounts of nitrogen has received little attention so far. We report that the Arctic may become a substantial source of N 2 O when the permafrost thaws, and that N 2 O emissions could occur from surfaces covering almost one-fourth of the entire Arctic.
View