ArticlePDF Available

Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered Development of Political Ambition Among Ordinary Americans

Authors:
Melody Crowder-Meyer at Davidson College
Melody Crowder-Meyer
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract and Figures

Americans without prestigious educational or professional backgrounds hold offices throughout the American government. Yet we know little about how these ordinary Americans developed political ambition or whether gender differences in ambition are present among this population. This paper uses a national sample of 1240 Americans to fill these gaps, identifying how political ambition develops differently for ordinary men and women, and drawing on this knowledge to help explain the surge in female candidates following the 2016 election. In contrast with elite samples, I show that the factors determining men’s political ambition are almost entirely distinct from those shaping women’s ambition among the mass public. I theorize that ordinary women’s ambition is particularly affected by the gendered expectations of those around them and the challenges they face balancing caregiving, work, and political engagement without the experience and resources possessed by elite women. I find support for this theory; ordinary women’s ambition is particularly dependent on the support of personal and political sources who can help them manage the demands of candidacy. In contrast, ordinary men’s ambition depends far less on encouragement from others, and instead increases with levels of education, political participation, and marriage. These results, and the distribution of the factors shaping ambition among Americans, help explain women’s low descriptive representation among American candidates and elected officials. They also provide a potential explanation for the unusual increase in women’s candidacies in 2017 and 2018.
Figures - available from: Political Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Content uploaded by Melody Crowder-Meyer
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Melody Crowder-Meyer on Nov 05, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
A full text version of "Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered
Development of Political Ambition Among Ordinary Americans" can be viewed at:
https://rdcu.be/6sWp
A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Learn more
Content available from Political Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
... Much of the previous literature on motivations to seek elected office has focused largely either on personality traits (Dynes et al., 2019(Dynes et al., , 2020Fox & Lawless, 2011) or on demographic characteristics (Campbell & Wolbrecht, 2006;Crowder-Meyer, 2020;, 2010, 2010, and has largely ignored the roles of goals, aspirations, or other intrinsic motivations, at least at an empirical level (though such motivations are often invoked in normative discussions). While personality may affect individual motivations (Esteve et al., 2016;Fennimore, 2020;Jang, 2012;Mondak, 2010;Mondak & Halperin, 2008;Piatak & Holt, 2020a, 2020bSlabbinck & van Witteloostuijn, 2020;Tepe, 2016;Tepe & Prokop, 2018;van Witteloostuijn et al., 2017,), we also believe goals and aspirations should play roles in individuals' desires to become involved in public office. ...
... The potential importance of PSM in explaining ambition is underscored by its relationships with factors previously determined to be important for ambition. Taylor and Clerkin (2011) find PSM helps predict political activity of various types (i.e., becoming involved in campaigning, contributing money, and participating in communal activities) among undergraduate students, and many of these same activities are associated with being more likely to be recruited to run for office as well as actually running for office (Crowder-Meyer, 2020;Fox & Lawless, 2014). Additionally, Kim (2021) finds Korean high school graduates who acquired leadership experience in high school exhibited higher levels of PSM, consistent with Fox and Lawless's (2014) finding that those who ran for student government exhibited higher levels of ambition. ...
Seeking the Public Good: Public Service Motivation and Political Ambition
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2024
  • POLIT BEHAV
Many previous studies have shown that public service motivation (PSM) is associated with public sector employment. However, with few exceptions, such studies have focused on unelected positions in public sector bureaucracies, despite many other avenues for public service. Using a nationally representative survey of United States respondents, a survey of federal bureaucrats, and a survey of law students, we show that PSM is associated with ambition for holding elected office, high-level public sector positions, and judicial positions, at least in the United States. Moreover, the results are broadly comparable across different types of ambition (i.e., bureaucratic, electoral, and judicial), suggesting that the PSM dimensions—and especially Attraction to Policy Making (APM)—transcend institutions in explaining individuals’ interest in service in public sector offices of all types.
View
... These findings contribute to the literature by focusing more attention on why some women do run for office, rather than on why many women abstain from doing so. They also help us to better understand the factors that promote political ambition and office-seeking among ordinary women (Crowder-Meyer 2020), meaning members of the general population rather than among individuals in elite occupations (Fox and Lawless 2005). They also underscore the mass-level political consequences of labor unions in the United States, a diminished, but still relevant organization in American politics. ...
Labor Union Membership and Women’s Political Ambition: Evidence from the United States
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
Women have long been underrepresented in American politics. This is evidenced by women being less likely to run for and hold elected office. Existing scholarship largely focuses on explaining why women are less politically ambitious than their male counterparts but pays less attention to why some women do run for office. To this end, I focus on the potential role of labor union membership. I argue that labor unions can foster political ambition and increase ordinary people’s likelihood of running for office. I test this among women in the American mass public, primarily with survey data from the 2010–22 Cooperative Election Study (CES). Overall, I find that labor union membership is significantly associated with women’s likelihood of running for office. I also find that this robust relationship is unlikely to be driven by self-selection or omitted variable biases. Overall, these findings help us to better understand the sources of political ambition, illustrate a viable potential pathway to boost women’s likelihood of seeking elected office, and underscore the political consequences of organized labor.
View
... Research shows that recruitment by those who can offer resources to candidates, as well as encouragement to run for office by others, are both critical to individuals -particularly women taking the step toward declaring their candidacy. 13 We examined which groups of people received personal encouragement to run for office from organizations versus individuals that are in their personal network. Encouragement from organizations includes contact from political leaders (national, local); other leaders or groups in the local community; other national leaders or groups; a formal candidate training group; or members of the media. ...
From interest to candidacy: Supporting young people on their path to running for office
Article
Full-text available
  • Sep 2022
The upcoming 2022 midterm elections feature some of the first Gen Z candidates running for national office. They are vying to make a dent in severe youth underrepresentation among elected officials: despite making up more than a quarter of the voting population, as of 2021, only 7% of the 117th Congress members were millennials (Schaeffer, 2021). Furthermore, the handful of youth who currently hold office do not fully reflect the racial, gender, and political diversity of young voters (Thompson & Singh, 2018). More representative democracies better reflect the interests of all constituencies. The relative lack of youth in elected office poses a challenge for creating such a democracy. In September, CIRCLE released a white paper featuring new research on youth running for office: their level of interest, the barriers they perceive, the support they do or don’t receive for running, and the disparities in all these factors that must be addressed. In this summary, we add to that research by exploring the literature on factors that shape whether and which youth run for office, in order to inform both future research and efforts by organizations and practitioners.
View
View
Family Matters: How Romantic Partners Shape Politicians' Careers
Article
  • Apr 2025
This Element studies how career support from romantic partners affects career patterns and costs in politics. It argues that a lower level of career support from romantic partners leads to a lower likelihood for political promotion among women politicians (the partner support hypothesis), as well as greater stress on women politicians' relationships when they advance (the career stress hypothesis). Both predictions find support in Swedish data for more than 80,000 political careers over a fifty-year period. Women politicians are in relationships that prioritize their male partner's career and where that partner does less unpaid work in the household. This is important in explaining women's career disadvantage. It also explains why promotions double the divorce rate for women but leave men's relationships intact. The analysis sheds light on the role played by romantic partners in gender inequality in politics. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
View
Works Cited
Chapter
  • Mar 2025
It Takes More Than a Candidate remains the only systematic account of the gender gap in political ambition. Based on national surveys of more than 10,000 potential candidates in 2001, 2011, and 2021, the book shows that women, even in the highest tiers of professional accomplishment, are substantially less likely than men to demonstrate ambition to seek elective office. The gender gap in persists across generations and over time, despite society's changing attitudes toward women in politics. Women remain less likely to be recruited to run for office, less likely to think they are qualified to run, and less likely to express a willingness to run for office in the future. In the twenty years since It Takes a Candidate was first published, the book remains timely and eye-opening, highlighting the challenges women face navigating the candidate emergence process and providing insight into the persistent gender gap in political ambition.
View
Crowded Out: The Influence of Mental Load Priming on Intentions to Participate in Public Life
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2025
  • BRIT J POLIT SCI
How does cognitive household labour – the ‘mental load’ involved in anticipating, fulfilling, and monitoring household needs – influence decisions about whether and how to participate in public life? Studies suggest women take on the vast majority of this load, yet the impact of these private sector inequalities on participation in public life is underexplored. To make progress on these questions, we contribute new causal evidence about the effect of prompting respondents to think about their own mental loads in a survey experiment fielded to employed British parents. Our main argument is that priming the mental load will crowd out interest in political and labour market participation. In line with expectations, our survey experiment finds a strong negative effect of mental load priming on intentions to engage in politics and at work. Our results offer new insights about the continuing relevance of household-based inequalities to gender equality in public life.
View
Gendered Jobs and Local Leaders: Women, Work, and the Pipeline to Local Political Office
Book
  • Feb 2025
Men from business are overrepresented in local politics in the United States. The authors propose a theory of gendered occupations and ambition: the jobs people hold-and the gender composition of those jobs-shape political ambition and candidate success. They test their theory using data on gender and jobs, candidacy and electoral outcomes from thousands of elections in California, and experimental data on voter attitudes. They find that occupational gendered segregation is a powerful source of women's underrepresentation in politics. Women from feminine careers run for office far less than men. Offices also shape ambition, candidates with feminine occupations run for school board, not mayor or sheriff. In turn, people see the offices that women run for as feminine and less prestigious. This Element provides a rich picture of the pipeline to office and the ways it favours men. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
View
Does the Presence or Absence of Elections Remove Gender Differences in Ambition for Public Service?
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2025
  • BRIT J POLIT SCI
Perhaps because scholars of political ambition have focused almost entirely on electoral ambition, the presence of elections has been thought to play a major role in shaping who expresses interest in public service. In this article, we examine whether the presence or absence of elections changes women’s political ambition. Using surveys of law students, federal bureaucrats, and the general public, we find the relationship between gender and ambition for elected office is similar to the relationship between gender and ambition for bureaucratic and judicial service. We show that, although women are deterred from public service by the elections that act as gateways to those opportunities, the effects of elections on gendered political ambition duplicate the effects of other components of public service. Rather than unique, elections are duplicative in their effects, reinforcing the relationship between gender and ambition rather than fundamentally changing who expresses ambition for public service.
View
View
ReLogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2003
  • J STAT SOFTW
We study rare events data, binary dependent variables with dozens to thousands of times fewer ones (events, such as wars, vetoes, cases of political activism, or epidemiological infections) than zeros ("nonevents"). In many literatures, these variables have proven difficult to explain and predict, a problem that seems to have at least two sources. First, popular statistical procedures, such as logistic regression, can shar ply underestimate the probability of rare events. We recommend corrections that outperform existing methods and change the estimates of absolute and relative risks by as much as some estimated effects repor ted in the literature. Second, commonly used data collection strategies are grossly inefficient for rare events data. The fear of collecting data with too few events has led to data collections with huge numbers of obser vations but relatively few, and poorly measured, explanator y variables, such as in international conflict data with more than a quarter-million dyads, only a few of which are at war. As it turns out, more efficient sampling designs exist for making valid inferences, such as sampling all available events (e.g., wars) and a tiny fraction of nonevents (peace). This enables scholars to save as much as 99% of their (nonfixed) data collection costs or to collect much more meaningful explanator y variables. We provide methods that link these two results, enabling both types of corrections to work simultaneously, and software that implements the methods developed.
View
The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates
Book
  • Jan 1998
Examining party leaders' bias against women, this study shows why women hold a clear minority of seats in state legislatures and offers suggestions on how to redress this imbalance.
View
Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office
Book
  • Jun 2012
Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office explores the factors that drive political ambition at the earliest stages. Using data from a comprehensive survey of thousands of eligible candidates, Jennifer L. Lawless systematically investigates what compels certain citizens to pursue elective positions and others to recoil at the notion. Lawless assesses personal factors, such as race, gender and family dynamics, that affect an eligible candidate's likelihood of considering a run for office. She also focuses on eligible candidates' professional lives and attitudes toward the political system.
View
View
View
It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office
Book
  • Jan 2001
It Takes a Candidate serves as the first systematic, nationwide empirical account of the manner in which gender affects political ambition. Based on data from the Citizen Political Ambition Study, a national survey conducted on almost 3,800 'potential candidates', we find that women, even in the highest tiers of professional accomplishment, are substantially less likely than men to demonstrate ambition to seek elected office. Women are less likely than men to be recruited to run for office. They are less likely than men to think they are 'qualified' to run for office. And they are less likely than men to express a willingness to run for office in the future. This gender gap in political ambition persists across generations. Despite cultural evolution and society's changing attitudes toward women in politics, running for public office remains a much less attractive and feasible endeavor for women than men.
View
Where women run: Gender and party in the American States
Book
  • Jan 2010
Why don’t more women run for office? Why are certain states more likely to have female candidates and representatives? Would strengthening political parties narrow the national gender gap? Where Women Run addresses these important questions through a rare and incisive look at how candidates are recruited. Drawing on surveys and case studies of party leaders and legislators in six states, political scientist Kira Sanbonmatsu analyzes the links between parties and representation, exposing the mechanism by which parties’ informal recruitment practices shape who runs-or doesn’t run-for political office in America. “Kira Sanbonmatsu has done a masterful job of linking the representation of women in elective office to the activities of party organizations in the states. She combines qualitative and quantitative data to show how women are navigating the campaign process to become elected leaders and the changing role of party organizations in their recruitment and election. It is a significant contribution to the study of representative democracy.” --Barbara Burrell, Northern Illinois University “Sanbonmatsu has produced an excellent study that will invigorate research on the role of political parties and the recruitment of women candidates. Using a variety of methods and data sources, she has crafted a tightly constructed, clearly argued, and exceedingly well-written study. A commendable and convincing job.” --Gary Moncrief, Boise State University “Sanbonmatsu offers important insights in two neglected areas of American politics: the role of political parties in recruiting candidates and the continued under-representation of women in elected office. Connecting the two subjects through careful qualitative and statistical methods, insightful interpretation of the literature and interesting findings, the book is a significant new addition to scholarship on parties, gender, and political recruitment.” --Linda Fowler, Dartmouth College.
View
View
View
Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support
Article
  • Sep 2016
Gender differences in who gets recruited by political party elites contribute to women’s underrepresentation on the ballot, but recent evidence suggests that even when women are recruited to the same extent as men, they are still less likely to be interested in seeking office. Why do men and women respond differently to invitations to seek office? We hypothesize that women view party recruitment as a weaker signal of informal support than men do. We use a survey experiment on a sample of 3,640 elected municipal officeholders—themselves prospective recruits for higher office—to test this. We find that female respondents generally believe party leaders will provide female recruits less strategic and financial support than male recruits. In other words, even when elites recruit women, women are skeptical that party leaders will use their political and social capital on their behalf. This difference may account for many women’s lukewarm responses to recruitment.
View