Content uploaded by Madhura Jayasinghe
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Madhura Jayasinghe on Sep 11, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN 2472-1921
2018
Vol.4 No.2:8
iMedPub Journals
www.
i
m
e
dpub.
c
om
Research Article
DOI: 10.4172/2472-1921.100070
1
© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License | This article is available in: https://clinical-nutrition.imedpub.com/
Manokaran S1,
Jayasinghe MA1*,
Senadheera AS2,
Gunathilaka SS3,
Kalina S1, Chandrajith VG1
and Ranaweera KDS1
1 Department of Food Science &
Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences,
University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri
Lanka
2 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of
Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata
University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of
Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata
University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
*Corresponding author:
Madhura A. Jayasinghe
madhura@sci.sjp.ac.lk
Department of Food Science & Technology,
Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri
Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.
Tel: +94716255690
Citation: Manokaran S, Jayasinghe MA,
Senadheera AS, Gunathilaka SS,
Kalina S, et al. (2018) Determinaon of
Glycaemic Responses of Low Fat Milk
Incorporated with Whey Proteins and Oats
Powder. J Clin Nutr Diet Vol.4 No.2:8
Received: July 21, 2018; Accepted: August 03, 2018; Published: August 10, 2018
Abstract
Objecve: Invesgaon of glycaemic responses of low fat milk, enriched with
whey proteins.
Design: Randomized crossover study.
Parcipants: Healthy volunteers (n=11) including both sexes (6 males and 5
females), aged between 20 and 30 years and with a body mass index of 18.5-23.5.
Main outcome measures: Blood glucose concentraons at fasng and 30, 45,
60, 90, 120 min were measured following ingeson of; skimmed milk powder,
incorporated with extra whey proteins and oats our (4:1 rao), containing 50 g
of available carbohydrates. Glycaemic Index values were expressed as the average
value of 11 subjects.
Results: GI for the prepared formulaon was 12 ± 2 and the average peak
reducon of compared to the standard (Glucose) was 37.7%. Proximate analysis
of the product indicated a higher total protein content (36.08 ± 2.5%) compared to
fresh milk powder (21.9 ± 2.7%) and very low fat content (4.34 ± 0.5%) compared
to fresh milk powder (29.3 ± 2.1%).
Conclusions: Incorporaon of whey powder have signicantly reduced the
Glycaemic index of milk (p<0.05). Although digesble carbohydrate content was
increased by addion of oats and also being lower in fat; low GI milk powder
formulaons can be developed by incorporang whey proteins and cereal grains
like oats.
Keywords: Glycaemic index; Low fat milk; Whey proteins; Oats
Determinaon of Glycaemic Responses of
Low Fat Milk Incorporated with Whey
Proteins and Oats Powder
Introducon
In the current scenario, about 17% individuals in the world
populaon are assumed to be suering from diabetes and other
related non-communicable diseases, due of their improper food
habits [1]. Diabetes is a non-communicable disease which is
resulted by connued increase of the blood glucose levels rapidly
and habitually [2]. The concepts of Glycemic Index and glycemic
load are used widely to idenfy impacts by food sources on blood
glucose rise.
There are several factors aecng the GI of food. Recent studies
indicate that certain milk proteins have insulin tropic properes
and may substanally increase post prandial levels of insulin [3].
According to the Ercan’s research, he observed that a decrease
of the glucose response when a reasonable amount of fat was
ingested together with carbohydrates [4].
Though several people are avoiding the dairy and dairy products
because they believe it increase the obesity, osteoarthris and
CVD, according to the Serge Roz Enberg et al. [5], dairy products
do not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, parcularly if
low fat.
This study was designed focusing on the glycemic responses in
milk powder; with reduced fat and increased whey proteins.
Many high protein dairy based powder formulaons available in
2018
Vol.4 No.2:8
Journal of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN 2472-1921
This article is available in: https://clinical-nutrition.imedpub.com/
2
the market are also rich in other calorie contributors, namely fats
and carbohydrates. Although these milk powder products provide
high calories and proteins, their higher impact to elevate blood
glucose levels aer consumpon, may induce the risk of geng
pre-diabetes condions when regularly consumed. Further, the
high fat content may elevate total triglycerides and LDL in blood
as well. Hence, cow milk was formulated and standardized to
reduce its fat and, not all reduced fat has contributed in relave
increase of carbohydrates in milk, but more milk whey proteins
were incorporated to the nal formulaon. So, the nal milk
product is a low fat-high protein diet.
Many Asians including Sri Lankans incorporate sugar (sucrose)
when consuming milk powder as tea or as whole milk. Hence, it is
important to have an inial low Glycemic Index in the formulated
milk powder, which will not greatly increase the glycemic
responses aer incorporaon of sugar to it.
Both proteins and fats in food are known to reduce the blood
glucose elevaons [6], but it was unknown which may have
higher impact to reduce GI in dairy sources. Therefore, this
study will be a determining factor to understand the realisc and
relave impact on glycemic responses by milk whey proteins and
milk fat altogether.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Fat was reduced (5.31%) in cow milk (15 L) and was spray dried
to reduce moisture up to 3.5%. Oats powder and whey protein
powder were obtained from reputed commercial brands and
ground to make a ne powder (parcle size 0.05–0.01 mm). For
100 g of milk powder, 20 g of whey and 10 g of oats powder were
incorporated.
Preparaon of breakfast meals: Skimmed milk powder was mixed
with powdered oats and whey. The raos of food ingredients
for each food were selected by considering the palatability test
decided via a panel (non-trained).
Analysis of proximate composion: Proximate composions
of the powder mixture was determined. The moisture and ash
contents were measured by AOAC ocial methods [7,8]. The
digesble carbohydrate content, fat and soluble & insoluble
dietary bre was determined with Holm’s method [9], Croon
and Guchs [10] and by the method of Asp [11] respectively.
The crude protein was by Kjeldahl method using Copper/
Selenium catalysts [12].
Ethical clearance: Ethical clearance (No.77/17) was obtained
from the Ethical Review Commiee, Faculty of Medical Sciences,
University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka. Informed wrien
consent from all parcipang subjects was obtained prior to the
study.
Determinaon of glycaemic indices: Determinaon of the GI
was carried out as a randomized crossover study, reviewed by
Brouns et al. in 2005 [13]. Healthy volunteers (n=11) including
both sexes (6 males and 5 females), aged 20 - 30 years and with
a body mass index of 18.5-23.5 were selected. The subjects were
asked to refrain from smoking, taking alcohol and to restrict
vigorous physical acvies the day before.
Glucose was used as the standard food (GI=100). The test food
(within 2 hours following preparaon) and the standard food
were served to the same individual on separate occasions
randomly. Following an overnight fast of 8 - 12 hours, a nger
prick capillary blood sample was obtained from the subject. The
subject was served with standard or test food containing 50 g
of digesble carbohydrate porons to be consumed within 10
minutes with 250 ml drinking water. Capillary blood samples were
collected at 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min following the rst bite of
the meal. Serum glucose concentraons were determined with a
Glucose-Oxidase kit (BIOLABOSATM; Biolabosa, France). The GI
was calculated using the mean of the individual incremental area
under the curve of the test food and of the standard food [13].
The glycaemic load (GL) value of the test food was calculated. (GL
= GI*digesble starch per serving (g))/100).
Stascal analysis: Proximate composion values were expressed
as the mean ± standard deviaon. GI values are expressed as the
mean with SEM. The means of the GI values of test food were
compared with typical cow milk, using a paired Student’s t-test
using Microso Excel 2013 at 95% condence level.
Results
Proximate composions of fresh cow milk powder and the
formulated new powder sample are stated in Figure 1. Signicant
dierences were observed (p<0.05) in all three macronutrient
contents (fat, protein, digesble carbohydrates) between the
two samples. Crude bre contents in both samples were not
measurable. The remainders were considered to be mineral ash.
GI for the prepared formulaon was 12 ± 2 (Low GI) and that is
signicantly (p<0.05) lower compared to the stated GI of fresh
milk, that is 36 as was found by David et al. [14]. A lowering of GI
about three mes in the new powder formulaon was achieved
due to incorporaon of whey and oats powder to replace great
amount of milk fat.
The average maximum peak value for glucose is 162.7, and the
average peak value for the newly formulated powder was greatly
reduced up to 101.3 (Table 1). Hence the peak reducon is by
37.73% (Table 2).
The glycaemic response curve of the prepared powder formulaon
(Figure 2) clearly indicated a lower peak value compared to the
standard (Glucose). The peaking me was observed earlier by 15
minutes compared to glucose (Figure 2).
According to the Glycaemic Load scale GL values ≥ 20 are
considered as high, between 11 to 19 as intermediate and GL ≤
10 as low. The calculated GL value for the formulated powder
sample was 2.3 (Table 2); that indicates of a very low GL value.
2018
Journal of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN 2472-1921
3
© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
Vol.4 No.2:8
to incorporaon of oats powder. The fat; which is a known factor
for reducing GI, was lower in the new formulaon compared to
fresh milk. The results of proximate analysis did not reveal of a
considerable inclusion of dietary bre by oats powder to the new
formulaon as well. Hence, the addion of whey proteins can be
considered as the crucial factor aecng the signicant reducon
observed in GI.
Cow milk contains, many essenal nutrients which helps to
maintain the healthy human life style. According to some
sciensts, there is no evidence to achieve essenal nutrients
requirement by a dairy free diet [5]. The problem is that; may
Asians including Sri Lankans carry the habit of incorporang
sugar when drinking milk. Hence, it is of utmost importance to
decrease the inial GI of milk as low as possible.
It was unknown that how the reducon of fat and increment
of whey proteins together impact on the glycemic impact on
milk; especially when the digesble carbohydrate content too is
increased by addion of cereals like oats. Both the increment of
digesble carbohydrate content by addion of cereal powder,
and also reducon of fat can increase the GI, but this study
reveals that; incorporaon of a considerable amount of whey
proteins can overcome both those impacts.
Glycaemic load allows comparisons of the likely glycaemic eect
of realisc porons of dierent foods, calculated as the amount
of carbohydrate in one serving mes the GI of the food. Majority
of the volunteers menoned that the poron size (89.5 g of
powder in total of 350 mL volume) of newly formulated powder
product as ‘larger’. Therefore, the GL value for the considered
powder formulaon may be lower, when considering the actual
poron size of a daily consumpon.
This study reveals of a very negave impact on blood glucose
elevaons by whey proteins which exceeds such an impact by
the milk fat content. Hence, these ndings may be of importance
for dairy powder producers in future.
Conclusion
Whey protein has a great impact on reducing glycemic responses
of milk. That can overtake the impact to increase the GI in
milk by reducon of fat and also a lile increase of digesble
carbohydrates by addion of cereal powders such as oats.
Hence, this informaon can be used by industrial producers in
formulang low fat-high protein milk powder products.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Prof. Sampath Amarathunga, the vice
chancellor of University of Sri Jayewardenepura – Sri Lanka and
Prof. Sudantha Liyanage, the Dean of the faculty of Applied
Sciences.
Food 0 min 15 min 30 min 45 min 60 min 90 min 120 min
Standard
(Glucose) 93.4 128.7 151.9 162.7 137.2 120.5 96.5
Formulated
sample 92.4 99 101.3 95.8 95.3 97.4 93.1
Table 1: Average blood glucose values with me.
Mean GI 12 ±2
Standard error mean 1.7
Poron size 350 mL
Peaking me 30 min.
Peak reducon 61.4 mg/dL
% Peak Reducon (compared to Glucose) 37.73
% GI reducon (Compared to fresh milk) 66.7
Glycaemic Load 2.3
Table 2: Detailed glycemic response results in newly formulated powder.
Figure 2 Blood glucose response curves (Glucose vs. formu-
lated sample).
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 0
Blood glucose level (mg/dL)
Test time intraval
Curve 1
Curve 2
*Curve 1: Glucose (standard) Curve 2: Newly formulated
powder
Figure 1 Comparison of macronutrient composion between
fresh milk and newly formulated powder product.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
fat protein carbohydrate
4.34
36.08
55.85
29.27
21.9
45.66
Comparion of nutrion composion (grams in 100 g of powder)
Newly formulated
powder
Fresh milk powder
Discussion
Since there was a signicant reducon in GI compared to
fresh milk in the newly formulated powder; it can be assumed
that whey proteins has a great impact in reducing glycemic
responses. The digesble carbohydrate content was higher due
2018
Vol.4 No.2:8
Journal of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics
ISSN 2472-1921
This article is available in: https://clinical-nutrition.imedpub.com/
4
References
1 American Diabetes Associaon (2013) Standards of medical care in
diabetes.
2 Bell KJ, Smart CE, Steil GM, Brand-Miller JC, King B, et al. (2015)
Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose
control in type 1 diabetes: implicaons for intensive diabetes
management in the connuous glucose monitoring era. Diabetes
Care 38: 1008-1015.
3 Nilsson M, Stenberg M, Frid AH, Holst JJ, Bjorck IM (2004) Glycemia
and insulinemia in healthy subjects aer lactose-equivalent meals
of milk and other food proteins: the role of plasma amino acids and
increns. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 1253-1246.
4 Ercan N, Gannon MC, Nuall FQ (1994) Eect of added fat on the
plasma glucose and insulin response to ingested potato given in
various combinaons as two meals in normal individuals. Diabetes
Care 17: 453-459.
5 Rozenberg S, Body JJ, Bruyère O, Bergmann P, Brandi ML, et al. (2016)
Eects of dairy products consumpon on health: benets and beliefs-
a commentary from the Belgian Bone Club and the European Society
for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthris
and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Calcif Tissue Int 98: 1-17.
6 Moghaddam E, Vogt JA, Wolever TM (2006) The eects of fat and
protein on glycemic responses in nondiabec humans vary with
waist circumference, fasng plasma insulin, and dietary ber intake.
J Nutr 136: 2506-2511.
7 Associaon of Ocial Analycal Chemists (1984) Ocial Methods
of Analysis of the AOAC 1984. 14th edion AOAC: Washington DC,
7.009.
8 Associaon of Ocial Analycal Chemists (1984) Ocial Methods
of Analysis of the AOAC 14th edion. AOAC: Washington DC, 14.004.
9 Holm J, Drews A, Asp NG (1986) A rapid method for the analysis of
starch. Starch/Starke 38: 226-224.
10 Croon LB, Guch G (1980) Crude fat analysis of dierent ours and
our products. Var Foda 32: 427-425.
11 Asp NG, Johansson CG, Hallmer H, Siljestrom M, et al. (1983) Rapid
enzymac assay of insoluble and soluble dietary ber. J Agr Food
Chem 31: 478-476.
12 Associaon of Ocial Analycal Chemists (1987) Ocial Methods of
Analysis of the AOAC. Washington DC 7.033.
13 Brouns F, Bjorck I, Frayn KN, Gibbs AL, Lang V, et al. (2005) Glycaemic
index methodology. Nutrion Research Reviews 18: 171-145.
14 Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, et al. (1981)
Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate
exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 34: 362-366.