- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Nature Sustainability
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
AnAlysis
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0133-x
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra, Italy. *e-mail: davy.vanham@ec.europa.eu
Water is an essential resource in meeting the Sustainable
Development Goals of water, food and energy security1.
Due to human freshwater use in different economic
activities, both blue (surface and groundwater) and green (soil
moisture) water resources are considered scarce2,3. Competition
for them will grow due to an increasing global population, shifting
lifestyles and climate change4–8. To achieve global food, water and
energy security, changes along the whole product supply chain are
necessary; that is, from the production to the consumption side. On
the consumption side, this includes dietary behaviour9. The water
footprint (WF) provides the possibility to link water resources to
this consumption side.
The WF is an indicator of freshwater use that looks at both the
direct and indirect water use of a consumer or producer10. It quanti-
fies consumptive water use along a supply chain. We use blue and
green WF components in our assessment. Blue water refers to liq-
uid water in rivers, lakes, wetlands and aquifers. Green water is the
soil water held in the unsaturated zone, formed by precipitation and
available to plants11. Irrigated agriculture receives blue water (from
irrigation) as well as green water (from precipitation), while rain-
fed agriculture receives only green water.
The WF of food consumption including diet scenarios has been
quantified on the national level12,13 and increasingly on geographi-
cally more detailed levels such as cities14,15, but not covering whole
nations to the highest geographical level of detail possible.
Individual food consumption behaviour depends strongly on
socio-economic factors such as age, gender, education level or
income16. Certain detailed food surveys provide such information.
Such detailed surveys are only available in a few countries. In Europe,
this includes France17, Germany18 and the United Kingdom19. On
the geographical level, we looked for the smallest entity where the
combined statistics age, gender and minimum one extra statistic
can be found, nationwide (spanning the whole country). We found
this situation for the statistic ‘highest level of education’, for 34,968
municipalities (including the boroughs of the three metropoli-
tan regions Paris, Lyon and Marseilles) in France, 8,506 statistical
entities in the United Kingdom and 412 districts in Germany. The
municipality is the fourth and lowest tier of governance in France
(after nation, region (Supplementary Fig. 2) and department). The
region level is the highest tier of sub-national division in the United
Kingdom (Supplementary Fig. 3), followed by the county and dis-
trict level, in which our analysed statistical entities fit. Districts are
the third tier of governance in Germany, after the federal and state
levels (Supplementary Fig. 4). The smallest administrative units in
Germany are municipalities.
We first assessed whether food surveys show differences in the
intake of food product groups between regions within a country. As
a second step, we then looked for differences with respect to these
three socio-economic factors (age, gender, education level) within
regions. The first step is important because regional food consump-
tion behaviour can depend on a combination of food availability
and (agricultural) tradition. People in southern Europe, for exam-
ple, consume more olive oil than in northern Europe. The results are
presented in Supplementary Tables 9, 10 and 11.
National food-consumption-related WFs
We compute the following national food-consumption-related
(green + blue) WFs: 2,757 (92% green and 8% blue) litres per capita
per day (l cap−1 d−1) for the United Kingdom, 2,929 (95% green and
5% blue) l cap−1 d−1 for Germany and 3,861 (93% green and 7% blue)
l cap−1 d−1 for France. National food-consumption-related WFs
result from both domestic agricultural and food-processing pro-
duction, as well as food product import. Worldwide, national food-
consumption-related WFs range from 1,493 to 9,899 l cap−1 d−1,
with a global average of 3,167 (88% green and 12% blue) l cap−1 d−1
(ref. 10). As agriculture in these three countries is dominated by
The water footprint of different diets within
European sub-national geographical entities
Davy Vanham *, Sara Comero, Bernd Manfred Gawlik and Giovanni Bidoglio
The water footprint concept has been recognized as being highly valuable for raising awareness of the large quantity of water
resources required to produce the food we consume. We present, for three major European countries (the United Kingdom,
France and Germany), a geographically detailed nationwide food-consumption-related water footprint, taking into account
socio-economic factors of food consumption, for both existing and recommended diets (healthy diet with meat, healthy
pescetarian diet and healthy vegetarian diet). Using socio-economic data, national food surveys and international food con-
sumption and water footprint databases, we were able to refine national water footprint data to the smallest possible adminis-
trative boundaries within a country (reference period 2007–2011). We found geographical differences in water footprint values
for existing diets as well as for the reduction in water footprints associated with a change to the recommended healthy diets.
For all 43,786 analysed geographical entities, the water footprint decreases for a healthy diet containing meat (range 11–35%).
Larger reductions are observed for the healthy pescetarian (range 33–55%) and healthy vegetarian (range 35–55%) diets.
In other words, shifting to a healthy diet is not only good for human health, but also substantially reduces consumption of
water resources, consistently for all geographical entities throughout the three countries. Our full results are available as a
supplementary dataset. These data can be used at different governance levels in order to inform policies targeted to specific
geographical entities.
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY | VOL 1 | SEPTEMBER 2018 | 518–525 | www.nature.com/natsustain
518
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved