ArticlePDF Available

DIVERSITY AND UTILISATION OF NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS OF TINSUKIA DISTRICT OF ASSAM, INDIA.

Authors:

Figures

ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
370
Journal Homepage: -www.journalijar.com
Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/7530
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7530
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DIVERSITY AND UTILISATION OF NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS OF TINSUKIA DISTRICT
OF ASSAM, INDIA.
*S. M. Das1, T. C. Dutta2, A. Roy1 and S. Borah3.
1. Department of Biology, G.T.B. Academy, Tinsukia, Assam, India.
2. Department of Botany, Digboi College, Digboi, Assam, India.
3. Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam, India.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Manuscript Info Abstract
……………………. ………………………………………………………………
Manuscript History
Received: 10 June 2018
Final Accepted: 12 July 2018
Published: August 2018
Keywords:-
NTFPs, diversity, utilization, Trade,
Threat.
Tinsukia district of Assam (India) is rich in natural wealth. The district
has total forest area about 1,55,97,900 hector which includes one
Biosphere reserve, one National Park, two Wildlife Sanctuaries and
thirty five Reserve Forests. A good number of villages are situated in
and around these forests. Major part of the population of the district is
dependent directly or indirectly on the forest resources. Non-Timber
Forest Products (NTFPs) are remarkably contributing to livelihoods of
the people living near the forest areas. They are collecting wild edible
plants & plant’s parts, fire wood, medicine, condiments, house building
& thatching materials, broom, fiber, resin, fodder plants, etc. for their
domestic use as well as for trade. NTFPs, like wild edible plants are of
great demand, especially in the urban areas. This ever increasing
demand of NTFPs is creating a potential threat of over exploitation to
the forest resources. But, judicious use of NTFPs may provide a regular
source of income & employment to a large section of the society across
age group in the district.
Copy Right, IJAR, 2018,. All rights reserved.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………....
Introduction:-
Forests have been providing timber as well as non-timber products to the mankind since time immemorial. These
Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) include medicinal plants, wild edible plants & plant’s parts, fuel wood, fodder
& forage, house building & thatching materials, condiments, colouring materials, fibers, rubber, beverages &
narcotics, latex, tannin, resin, etc. In developing countries, like India, Non-timber Forest Products are valuable
resources for rural livelihood. According to FAO Report 1995, “Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) are important
tools for addressing poverty issues for the marginalized, forest dependent communities, contributing to livelihoods,
including food security, income, health and sustainable human development”. Globally, an estimated 350million
people mostly in developing countries depend on NTFPs as their primary source of income, food, nutrition and
medicine (UNDP, 2004). Socio-economic importance and the value of NTFPs in the economics of tropical countries
are now well recognized. In almost all tropical countries, the collection of NTFPs is a major economic activity
(Ambrose, 2003) and about 500 million people living in or near forests being depended upon them for their
livelihood needs (Alexander, et al., 2002). A report from the Ministry of Environment and Forests, in 2010- 2011,
estimated that about 100 million people in India depend on various forest products other than timber, which in turn
generates Rs 20 billion in government revenue (Dattagupta, et al., 2014). An estimated 50 million economically
marginalized forest dwellers in India harvest large quantities of NTFPs for their subsistence as well as for trade
Corresponding Author:-S. M. Das.
Address:-Department of Biology, G.T.B. Academy, Tinsukia, Assam, India.
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
371
(Hegde, et al., 1996). In India, 90% of the plants supplied to the international market are from wild stock (Mishra, et
al., 2009).
Since the early 1990s the role of NTFPs for sustainable forest use and poverty alleviation has received increased
attention (Peters, et al., 1989). Until 1980s, no proper studies had done to understand the importance of NTFPs in
the sustainable development and livelihood needs of forest dependent communities. Last four decades, studies on
NTFPs have drawn attention of many workers in India (Gupta & Guleria, 1982; Mahapatra & Mitchell, 1997;
Nautiyal & Kaul, 2003; etc.). Although, few works are available on NTFPs in Assam (Nath, 2006; Dattagupta, 2010;
Sarmah & Saikia, 2014; Dutta, et al., 2016; Sarma, 2016, etc.), but till date no intensive study has been done on the
diversity and utilization of NTFPs and its impact on the livelihood of the people in Tinsukia district of Assam. The
present work involves in the documentation of diversity and uses pattern of NTFPs by the people of the district.
Tinsukia district is located between 95°22' to 95°38'E longitude and 27°23' to 27°48'N latitude; elevation ranges
from 143 to 124 meter. Total geographical area of the district is about 3790 sq.km. Total population is about 13,
16,948 (Census 2011). The district is bounded from north by Dhemaji District and Arunachal Pradesh, from south
and east by Arunachal Pradesh and west by Dibrugarh district. Tinsukia district has four revenue circles (i.e.,
Tinsukia circle, Doomdoma circle, Sadiya Circle & Margherita circle) which are divided into three subdivisions; viz,
Tinsukia, Sodiya and Margherita. The soil of the study area is mainly alluvial. The district is characterized by
humid subtropical climate with summer, winter and monsoon forming the seasonal cycle. The maximum average
temperature of about 350C and minimum of about 130C with average annual relative humidity of the district is about
75%. The vegetation of the district comprises grassland, swamp growth with an admixture of deciduous, semi
evergreen and evergreen forests. Tinsukia district has total forest area about 1,55,77,900 hector, which includes one
National Park and Biosphere Reserve (viz.Dibru-Saikhowa National Park and Biosphere Reserve), two Wildlife
Sanctuaries (viz. Bherjan-Borajan-Padumoni and Dihing-Patkai) and thirty five Reserve Forests. More than hundred
villages are situated in and around these forests.
Fig 1: Map of the study area
(Numbers 1-12 are the sampling sites)
Methodology:-
The study is based on field survey in different seasons from April, 2016 to May, 2018. Three forest fringe villages
from each revenue circle were randomly selected for the study. Information on NTFPs such as local name, purpose
of use, parts used, etc. from each selected village were collected with the help of semi structured questionnaires. The
respondents were the village headmen (Gaon Burha), other knowledgeable persons, NTFP collectors, traders,
traditional medicinal practitioners (Bez - Bezoni), and house wives (Martin, 1995; Huntington, 2000). All
information received was cross-checked with at least two additional interviewees. Market survey was also done in
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
372
some selected areas to find out the commercial potentialities of NTFPs of the district. NTFP yielding plant species
was collected and processed to put up on the herbarium sheets by following standard method (Jain & Rao, 1976).
Photography was done in the field whenever possible. Specimens like mushroom, was preserved in 4%
formaldehyde solution. Plant specimens were identified using standard literatures (Kanjilal, et al., 1934-40; Hooker,
1872-97) and by consulting experts of Botanical Survey of India, Arunachal Pradesh Regional Centre, Itanagar.
Results and Discussion:-
Agriculture was the major source of livelihood economy in the study areas. Beside this, a section of the dwellers
also earn their livelihood as tea garden workers, NTFP collection and trade, traditional medicine, wage labour,
livestock rearing, etc. NTFPs play a significant role in their daily life. Altogether, 176 numbers of NTFPs (168
species of plants and 8 species of Fungi) were commonly used by the local people for domestic as well as
commercial purposes (Table: 3, 4, 5 & 6). Among the plants, Dicotyledons 99 species (58.93%), Monocotyledons
62 species (36.90%) and Pteridophytes 7 species (4.16%); while Fungi consist of 1 species of Ascomycetes and 7
species of Basidiomycetes. Diversity of NTFPs in the sampling sites is represented below (Table-1).
Table 1:- NTFPs diversity in the sampling sites.
Revenue Circle
Places
(Sl. no. depicting the sampling
sites in the map of study area.)
Geographical Locations
Recorded NTFPs
(In No.)
Latitude
Longitude
Dicot
Fern
Fungi
Tinsukia
1. BarbhetaBongaliGoan
27󰥐
95o36󰥐
51
35
3
2
2. Tingrai Forest Village
27󰥐
95o53󰥐
77
53
5
4
3. PadumoniGoan
27󰥐
95o31󰥐
52
29
4
2
Doomdoma
4. Namhollong Block Gaon
27󰥐
95o76󰥐
82
56
4
3
5. KachijanGaon
27󰥐
95o70󰥐
82
53
5
2
6. Hanhkhati
27󰥐
95o69󰥐
68
43
4
2
Sadiya
7. Doom Pathar
27󰥐
95o75󰥐
62
33
4
3
8. Dolapani
27󰥐
95o82󰥐
65
34
4
3
9. Chapakhowa
27󰥐
95o76󰥐
42
31
3
2
Margherita
10. CharaiPung Forest Village
27󰥐
95o44󰥐
91
62
6
6
11. Namphoi Forest village
27󰥐
95o97󰥐
90
59
5
7
12. BhimPather
27󰥐
95o65󰥐
87
56
5
5
During the study, it was found that eight different parts of plants were using by the people as NTFPs of the study
areas for various purposes (Fig 2). It was also observed that the maximum number of NTFPs (i.e. 62.34%) was
harvested only for domestic consumption, where medicinal plants comprised the highest number of 91 species
(51.70%). About 37.66% of NTFPs including plants and fungi were collected for trade in local and regional markets.
Utilization pattern of NTFPs of Tinsukia district was found to have 22 different types (Table 2).
Fig 2:- Plant’s parts used as NTFPs in Tinsukia District
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Stem Root Leaf Young
Shoot
Flower Fruit Seed Bark
Percentage
Different plant parts used
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
373
Table 2:- Types of utilization of NTFPs in Tinsukia district
Sl. No.
Purposes
Number of Species
% of total
1
Medicine
91
51.70
2
Edible
76
43.18
3
Cultural & religion
21
11.93
4
Ornamental
16
9.09
5
Fodder
11
6.25
6
Condiment
8
4.55
7
Rope
7
3.98
8
Fencing
6
3.40
9
House construction
6
3.40
10
Fiber
5
2.84
11
Fish poisoning
5
2.84
12
Furniture making
5
2.84
13
Agricultural tools
4
2.27
14
Broom
4
2.27
15
Fire wood
4
2.27
16
Handle
4
2.27
17
Thatching
4
2.27
18
Tooth Brush
4
2.27
19
Dye
3
1.70
20
Packing material
2
1.13
21
Natural shampoo
1
0.57
22
Resin
1
0.57
Fig. 3:-Photographs of NTFPs of Tinsukia district of Assam (India) and their utilization.
Conclusion:-
With the increasing health consciousness among the people, they become creasy to have the food from natural
origin. This is encouraging large scale collection and commercialization of edible NTFPs. Since most of the edible
NTFPs consist of reproductive parts like flowers, fruits, seeds, underground stem, culm, etc., it is harmfully
affecting the regeneration process of NTFP sources. Over exploitation of NTFPs is creating a major threat of their
existence and hampering the conservation process. But, judicious use of NTFPs may provide a regular source of
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
374
income and employment to a large section of the society across age group in the district. Hence, awareness among
the all concern stakeholders for sustainable utilization of these NTFPs is the need of hour.
Table 3:- Diversity and Utilization of Non-Timber Forest Products (Dicotyledons) of Tinsukia district of Assam
Family
Scientific Name
Common
Name
Habit
Part(s) Used
Ranunculaceae
1. Naravelia zeylanica (L.)DC.
Gorapasoi
Climber
Young shoot - tooth
brush; Leaf & root
as medicinal
Dilleniaceae
2. Dillenia indica L.
Owtenga
Tree
Fruit’s fleshy calyx-
as vegetable,
Mucilaginous seed -
as natural shampoo.
Magnoliaceae
3. Magnolia hodgsonii (Hook.f. &
Thomson) H. Keng
Barhamthury
Tree
Wood- as handle of
instruments and fire
wood,
Tender bud - dye
preparation
Menispermaceae
4. Cissampelos pareira L.
Tubukilata
Climber
Young shoot tip
as medicine
5. Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Hook. f.
& Th
Shagunilata
Climber
Stem as medicine
Nymphaeaceae
6. Nymphaea nouchali Burm.f.
BagaVetphul
Aquatic
Herb
Flower bud- as
vegetable
Nelumbonaceae
7. Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.
Padumphul
Aquatic
Herb
Flower petals &
seeds are edible ;
Leaves as wrapper
& religious
Capparaceae
8. Crataeva religiosa G. Forst.
Barun
Tree
Leaves & fruits as
medicine
Flacourtiaceae
9. Flacortia cataphracta Roxb. ex
Willd
Ponial
Tree
Fruit - Edible
10. Gynocardia odorata R.Br.
Lemtem
Tree
Seed oil as
medicine
11. Hydnocarpus kurzii (King) Warb
Salmugura
Tree
Seed oil as
medicine
Carryophyllaceae
12. Drymaria cordata (L.)Willd. ex
Schult
Laizabori
Herb
Young shoot as
vegetables,
medicine
Clusiaceae
13. Garcinia cowa Roxb. ex Choisy
KawriThekera
Small
Tree
Fruit as medicine
14. Garcinia lanceaefolia Roxb.
RupahiThekera
Small
Tree
Fruit edible &
medicine
15. Garcinia morella (Gaertn.) Desr.
KujiThekera
Small
Tree
Fruit edible &
medicine,
16. Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. ex
Buch.- Ham.
Bar Thekera
Tree
Fruitedible ,
cultural & medicine
17. Garcinia xanthochymusHook. f. ex T.
Anderson
TeporTenga
Tree
Fruit edible &
medicine
18. Mesua ferrea L.
Nahar
Tree
Leaf as cultural
use; Stem as fire
wood; Flower-
Ornamental
Malvaceae
19. Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet
Japapatori
Herb
Root as medicine
20. Sida cordifolia L.
Sunborial
Shrub
Bark as fiber;
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
375
Root as medicine
21. Urena lobata L.
Sunborolowa
Shrub
Root as medicine
Bombacaceae
22. Bombax ceiba L.
Simalo
Tree
Bark as medicine;
Fruit as fiber
Sterculiaceae
23. Abroma augusta (L.)L.f.
Gorokhia
Koroi
Small
Tree
Root as medicine
24. Sterculia villosa Roxb.
Udal
Tree
Bark as rope;
Fruit as medicine
25. Byttneria aspera Collebr. ex Wall
TikoniBaruah
Climber
Young Shoot - as
vegetable &
medicine
Tiliaceae
26. Grewia asiatica L.
Sowra
Small
Tree
Leaves & fruits
medicine; Young
branch tooth brush
27. Grewia hirsute Vahl.
Kukurhuta
Tree
Bark as fiber;
Leaves & Seeds
as medicine
Elaeocapaceae
28. Elaeocarpus floribundus Blume
Jalfai
Tree
Fruit edible
29. Elaeocarpus serratus L.
Rudrakhya
Tree
Fruit as medicine
& religious use
Rutaceae
30. Citrus medica L.
JaraTenga
Shrub
Fruit - edible
31. Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.)DC.
Senglodi
Shrub
Young branch- as
tooth brush; Fruit
edible
32. Zanthozylum nitidum (Roxb.)DC.
Tezmuee
Shrub
Fruit & bark as
fish poisoning; Root
as medicine
Young branches
tooth brush; Young
shoot- condiment
Burseraceae
33. Canarium bengalense Roxb.
Dhuna
Tree
Latex - as resin
34. Garuga pinnata Roxb.
Rahimola
Tree
Leaves as fodder
Meliaceae
35. Walsura robusta Roxb.
Lali
Tree
Fruit & bark- as fish
poisoning
Rhamnaceae
36. Rhamnus nepalensis (Wall.) M. A.
Lowson
Biringuti
Shrub
Fruit edible; Bark
as medicine
37. Zizyphus jujube Mill.
Bagari
Small
Tree
Fruit edible;
Young shoot-
cultural
Vitaceae
38. Vitis quadrangularis (L.)Wall. ex
Wight
Harjura Lata
Climber
Young Shoot as
vegetable; Leaf &
Stem - as Medicine
Leeaceae
39. Leea guineensis G. Don
Owlata
Climber
Stem- as rope in
house building
Hippocastanacea
40. Aesculus assamica Griff
Ramanbih
Small
Tree
Seed as medicine;
Leaf & bark - as
fish poisoning
Anacardiaceae
41. Mangifera sylvatica Roxb.
Ban Aam
Tree
Fruit edible; Bark-
as Medicine; Leaf-
Cultural use
42. Rhus chinensis Mill.
Naga Tenga
Small
Tree
Fruit edible &
medicinal
43. Spondias pinnata (L.f.) Kurz.
Amara
Tree
Fruit & young leaf-
edible & medicine;
Bark as medicine
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
376
Caesalpiniaceae
44. Caesalpinia bonduc (L.)Roxb.
Letaguti
Straggling
shrub
Young leaf &Fruit
as medicine
45. Cassia alata L.
Kharpat
Shrub
Young leaves- as
medicine
Papilionaceae
46. Abrus precatorius L.
Latumoni
Climber
Fruit & root as
medicine
47. Butea monosperma (Lam.)Taub
Palakh
Tree
Bark as medicine;
Flower
Ornamental
48. Dalbergia pinnata (Lour.) Prain
Lalengchali
Liana
Bark as condiment
49. Pongamia pinnata (L.)Pierre.
Karash
Tree
Leaves- as fodder;
Seed as medicine
50. Erythrina variegata L.
Madar
Tree
Root, Bark &
leaves- medicine;
Flower
Ornamental
51. Flemingia strobilifera (L.)W.T.Aiton
Makhioty
Small
Tree
Root & Bark as
medicine; Young
shoot cultural use
52. Mellettia pachycarpa Benth.
Bakal Bih
Climber
Root as poison for
fishing
Rosaceae
53. Prunus jenkinsii Hook. f. & Thomson
TherejuTenga
Tree
Fruit edible; Shoot
as firewood
54. Rubus ellipticus Sm.
Jutulipaka
Straggling
shrub
Fruit edible;
Young Shoot as
medicine
55. Rubus lucens Focke
Jezeru Paka
Liana
Fruit edible
Combretaceae
56. Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.)Roxb.
Bhumura
Tree
Fruit as medicine
57. Terminalia chebula Ritz.
Hilikha
Tree
Fruit as medicine;
Bark source of dye
Myrtaceae
58. Syzygium balsameum (Wight) Wall.
ex Walp.
Jaldubuli
Tree
Young shoot as
medicine; Mature
Shoot as firewood
& handle
59. Syzygium cumini (L.)Skeels
Kala Jamu
Tree
Fruit edible; Bark
source of dye;
Seed- as medicine
60. Syzygium fruticosum DC.
Kuthi Jamu
Tree
Fruit - edible
61. Syzygium kurzii (Duthie) N.P.Balakr
Boga Jamu
Tree
Fruit - edible
Melastomaceae
62. Melastoma malabathricum L.
Fuhtukola
Shrub
Fruit edible;
Shoot- as broom
Lythraceae
63. Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.)Pers
Ajar
Tree
Flower &Dry fruit
Ornamental
Cucurbitaceae
64. Citrullus colocynthis (L.)Schrad.
Kuabhaturi
Climber
Fruit- as medicine
Apiaceae
65. Centella asiatica (L.)Urb.
Barmanimuni
Herb
Shoot as vegetable
& medicine
66. Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides Lam.
Harumanimuni
Herb
Shoot as vegetable
& medicine
Rubiaceae
67. Catunaregam spinosa (Thunb.)
Tirveng.
Bihmana
Small
Tree
Fruit as fish
poison & medicine
68. Meyna spinosa Roxb. ex Link
Kutkura
Small
Tree
Fruit- edible; Young
Shoot as medicine
69. Paederia foetida L.
Vedailota
Climber
Young Shoot as
vegetable &
medicine
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
377
Asteraceae
70. Enydra fluctuans Lour.
Helonchi
Herb
Young Shoot as
vegetable &
medicine
71. Wedelia calendulacea (L.)Less.
Bhimraj
Herb
Young leaf as
medicine
Plumbaginaceae
72. Plumbago zeylanica L.
Agyashit
Herb
Young Shoot as
medicine
Ebenaceae
73. Diospyros malabarica (Desr.) Kostel.
Kendu
Tree
Fruit edible; Seed
as medicine
Apocynaceae
74. Alostonia scholaris (L.) R. Br.
Sotiana
Tree
Bark as medicine
75. Ichnocarpus frutescens (L.) W.T.Aiton
Gakhirlata
Climber
Young leaves as
medicine
Convolvulaceae
76. Ichnocarpus frutescens (L.) W.T.Aiton
Lakhmanlata
Climber
Young shoot as
medicine
Solanaceae
77.Solanum indicum L.
Titavekuri
Herb
Fruit as vegetable
& medicine
78. Solanum trilobatum L.
Lata Tita
Shrub
Fruit- as medicine
Bignoniaceae
79. Oroxylum indicum (L.)Kurz
Bhat Ghila
Tree
Young fruit, Bark &
Root as medicine
Acanthaceae
80. Justicia adhatoda L.
BagaBahak
Shrub
Young leaves as
medicine
81. Phlogocanthus thrysiflorus Nees.
RangaBahak
Shrub
Flower as
vegetable &
medicine
Verbenaceae
82. Callicarpa macrophyllaVahl.
Tangloti
Shrub
Bark as medicine
83. Clerodendrum glandulosum Lindl.
Nephafu
Shrub
Young leaf as
medicine
84. Vitex negundo L.
Pasatia
Shrub
Young leaf as
medicine
Lemiaceae
85. Pogostemon benghalensis (Burm.f.)
Kuntze
Hukloti
Herb
Young leaf as
vegetable &
medicine
Piperaceae
86. Piper longum L.
Pipoli
Climber
Inflorescence as
medicine
87. Piper thomsonii(C.DC)Hook.f.
Aunipan
Climber
Leaf - edible
Lauraceae
88. Cinamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.)
Sweet
Naga Dalcini
Tree
Bark as condiment
89. Cinamomum verum J. Presl
Dalcini
Tree
Bark as condiment
90. Cinamomum tamala (Buch.-Ham)
T.Nees. & Eberm
Tezpat
Tree
Leaf as condiment
91. Litsea salicifolia (J. Roxb. ex Nees)
Hook. f.
Dighloti
Shrub
Young branch
cultural use
Euphorbiaceae
92. Baccaurea remiflora Lour.
Leteku
Tree
Fruit - edible
93. Croton joufera Roxb.
Mahudi
Shrub
Fruit & leaf as
medicine
Urticaceae
94. Boehmeria macrophylla Hornem.
Ban Riha
Shrub
Bark as source of
fiber
95. Sarcochlamys pulcherrima Gaudich
Mesaki
Small
Tree
Leaf as vegetable
& condiment
Moraceae
96. Artocarpous chama Buch.-Ham.
Cham Kathal
Tree
Fruit edible
97. Ficus benghalensis L.
Bargas
Tree
Young branch tip
cultural use
98. Ficus racemosa L.
Jagya Dimoru
Tree
Young branch
cultural use
Cannabaceae
99. Cannabis sativa L.
Bhang
Herb
Leaf as medicinal
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
378
& cultural use
Table 4:- Diversity and Utilization of Non-Timber Forest Products (Monocotyledons) of Tinsukia district of Assam.
Family
Scientific Name
Common Name
Habit
Part(s) Used
Orchidaceae
1. Cymbidium aloefolium Blume
Mata
Kapowphul
Epiphytic
Flower - as Ornamental
& Cultural
2. Dendrobium aphyllum (Roxb.)
C. E. C. Fisch.
Bhatowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
3. Dendrobium fimbriatum Hook.
Hokhiyotiphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
4. Dendrobium lituiflorum Lindl.
Bhatowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
5. Dendrobium moschatum
(Buch.-Ham.) Sw.
Bhatowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
6. Dendrobium transparens
Wall. Ex Lindl.
Bhatowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
7. Papilionanthe teres (Roxb.)
Schltr.
Bhatowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
& Cultural
8. Phaius tankervilleae (Banks)
Blume.
Mati
kapowphul
Terrestrial
Flower- as Ornamental
9. Rhyncostylis retusa (L.)
Blume
Kapowphul
Epiphytic
Flower- as Ornamental
& Cultural; Leaf- as
medicine
Zingiberaceae
10. Alpinia nigra (Gaertn.)Burtt
Tora
Herb
Leaf sheath as rope
Young Shoot &
rhizome as medicine
11. Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd.
ToraBaghini
Herb
Young Shoot &
rhizome as vegetable
& medicine
12. Curcuma aromatica Salisb.
Keturi
Herb
Rhizome as medicine
13. Curcuma caesia Roxb.
Kala Halodhi
Herb
Rhizome as medicine
14. Curcuma amada Roxb.
Amada
Herb
Rhizome as medicine
& condiment
15. Etlingera loroglossa
(Gagnep.) R.M.Sm.
Karphul
Herb
Rhizome as condiment
& medicinal
16. Kaempferia galanga L.
Gathiyon
Herb
Rhizome medicine;
YoungShoot vegetables;
Flower- ornamental
17. Kaempferia rotunda L.
Bhumi Champa
Herb
Rhizome as medicinal
18. Zingiber officinale Roscoe.
Moran Ada
Herb
Rhizome as
condiment & medicinal
Musacese
19. Musa aurantiaca G.Mann
ex Baker
Banaria Kal
Herb
Inflorescence - edible
20. Musa itinerans Cheesman
Banaria Kal
Herb
Inflorescence - edible
21. Musa nagensium Prain
Banaria Kal
Herb
Inflorescence edible
Marantaceae
22. Maranta arundinacea L.
Toraalu
Herb
Rhizome - edible
23. Phrynium pubinerve Blume
Kawpat
Herb
Leaf - wrapper & plate
24. Schumannianthus
dichotomous (Roxb.)Gagnep
Patidoi
Herb
Stem- as rope
Amaryllidaceae
25. Crinum asiaticum L.
Ban Naharu
Herb
Leaf & bulb - medicine
Dioscoreaceae
26. Dioscorea alata var.
globosa (Roxb.)Prain
Sapara Alo
Climber
Underground Stem -
edible
27. Dioscorea esculenta (Lour.)
Burkill
Gos Alu
Climber
Underground Stem -
edible
28. Dioscorea pentaphylla L.
Paspotia Alu
Climber
Underground Stem -
edible
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
379
29. Dioscorea villosa L.
Kath Alu
Climber
Underground Stem
edible & medicine
Liliaceae
30. Asparagus recemosusWilld.
Shatamul
Climber
Fasciculated root -
medicine
Smilacaceae
31. Smilax ovalifolia Roxb.ex
D. Don
BaghansuraLata
Climber
Root - medicine
Pontederiaceae
32. Monochoria hastate (L.)
Solms
PaniMateka
Herb
Young shoot -
vegetable
Commelinaceae
33. Commelina benghalensis L.
Kanahimalu
Herb
Young shoot - medicine
Arecaceae
34. Arenga pinnata (Wurmb)
Merr.
MamoiTamul
Palm
Stem & leaves sheath
as cultural
35. Calamus flagellum Griff.ex
Mart.
Raiding Bet
Rattan
Cane manufacture
furniture, stick;Young
stem tip as vegetable
36. Calamus gracilies Roxb.
Suli Bet
Rattan
Cane as rope
37. Calamus tenuis Roxb.
Jati Bet
Rattan
Cane furniture &
house construction
Young stem tip as
vegetable
38. Caryota urens L.
SewaTamul
Palm
Stem House
construction, fencing,
handle, agricultural
tools; Fruit edible &
medicine
39. Licuala peltata Roxb.ex
Buch.- Ham.
Jengu Pat
Palm
Leaf as thatching
material; Fruit edible
40. Livistona jenkinsiana Griff.
TakowTamul
Palm
Leaf as thatching
material; Fruit edible
Araceae
41. Acorus calamus L.
Bos
Herb
Corm - medicine
42. Alocasia fornicata (Roxb.)
Schott
BejKasu
Herb
Corm as vegetable
43. Alocasia macrorrhizos (L.) G.
Don
Man Kasu
Herb
Corm as vegetable,
Petiole as vegetable
& Medicine
44. Alocasia odora (Lind.)K.
Koch
Dahi Kasu
Herb
Petiole - as vegetable
45. Amorphophallus bulbifer
(Roxb.) Blume
Ul Kasu
Herb
Corm as vegetable
46. Colocasia esculenta (L)
Schott.
Kola Kasu
Herb
Petiole & Sub-aerial
Stem as vegetable
47. Homalomena aromatic
(Spreng.) Schott
Gandha Kasu
Herb
Leaf & petiole as
medicine
48. Laisia spinosa (L.)Thwaites.
Shengmara
Herb
Youngshoot as
vegetable & medicine
Cyperaceae
49. Schoenoplectiella articulata
(L.) Lye
Sesu Ban
Grass
Underground Stem
edible
Poaceae
50. Arundo donax L.
Nal
Grass
Young Shoot - as
fodder
51. Bambusa nutans Wall. Ex
Munro
MakalBanh
Bamboo
Young Shoot - as
vegetables;Mature stem
house construction,
fencing, agricultural
tools, furniture
52. Saccharum ravennae (L.) L.
Ekara
Grass
Young shoot as
fodder
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
380
53. Hygroryza aristata
(Retz.) Nees ex Weight &Arn.
Dalghanh
Grass
Young shoot as
fodder
54. Imperata cylindrica (L.)
Raeusch
Ulu Kher
Grass
Young shoot fodder;
Young root medicine
Mature shoot as
thatching material
55. Leersia hexandra Sw.
Erali
Grass
Young shoot -fodder
56. Ophiuros megaphyllus Stapf
ex Hains
Banhpatia Ban
Grass
Young shoot - fodder
57. Phragmites karka
(Retz.) Trin. ex Steud.
Khagori
Grass
Young shoot fodder;
Mature stem - house
construction & fencing
58. Saccharum spontaneum L.
Kanhua
Grass
Young shoot fodder;
Mature shoot as
thatching material;
Flower - ornamental
59. Schizostachyum dullooa
(Gamble) R.B.Majumdar
DolooBanh
Bamboo
Young Shoot -
vegetables; Young stem
cultural & making
rope; Mature stem -
house construction,
fencing, broom, tools,
furniture
60. Pseudostachyum
polymorphum Munro
Nal Banh
Bamboo
Young Shoot - edible;
Mature stem - house
construction, fencing,
tools, furniture
61. Thysanolaena latifolia
(Rox.ex Hornem.) Honda
Jaru Ban
Grass
Young Shoot - as
fodder; Mature stem -
as fencing; Mature
flower as broom
62. Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.)
Roberty
Birina
Grass
Leaf as fodder; Root
as medicine
Table 5:- Diversity and Utilization of Non-Timber Forest Products (Pteridophytes) of Tinsukia district of Assam.
Family
Scientific Name
Common Name
Habit
Part(s) Used
Athyriaceae
1. Diplazium esculantum
(Retz.)Sw.
Dhekia Shak
Herb
Young leaf as
vegetable
Blechnaceae
2. Stenochlaena palustris
(Burn.f.) Bedd
Dhekia Lata
Climber
Young leaf edible;
Mature stem as rope
Drynariaceae
3. Drynaria quercifolia (L.)
J. Sm.
Hukan Dhekia
Epiphytic
Mature leaf as
ornamental
Gleicheniaceae
4. Dicranopteris linearis
(Burm. f.) Underw.
KalamDhekia
Terrestrial
Herb
Leaf petiole as cultural
Lygodiaceae
5. Lygodium flexuosum (L.)
Sw.
KapowDhekia
Climber
Young Leaf as cultural
Dennstaedtiaceae
6. Pteridium aquilinum (L.)
Kuhn.
DhekiaShak
Herb
Young leaf as
vegetable
Thelypteridaceae
7. Christella parasitica H.
Lev.
Bihlongoni
Herb
Leaf as medicine and
cultural use
Table 6:- Diversity and Utilization of Non-Timber Forest Products (Fungi) of Tinsukia district of Assam.
Class
Scientific Name
Common
Name
Habitat
Part(s) Used
Ascomycetes
1. Morchella esculanta
Kathphula
Rotten wood
Fruiting body as
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
381
vegetable
Basidiomycetes
2. Agaricus bisporus
Beng-Sata
Grassland
Fruiting body as
vegetable
3. Auricularia auricul
Kathphula
Moist wood
Fruiting body as
vegetable
4. Ganoderma sp.
Kathphula
Rotten wood
Fruiting body as
vegetable
5. Lycoperdon sp.
Kathphula
Grassland
Fruiting body as
vegetable & medicine
6. Pluteus cervinus
Kathphula
Rotten wood
Fruiting body as
vegetable
7. Schizophyllum commune
Kathphula
Rotten wood
Fruiting body as
vegetable
8. Termitomyces sp.
Kathphula
Rotten wood
Fruiting body as
vegetable
References:-
1. Ambrose- Oji B. (2003): The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihood of the forest poor: evidence from the
tropical forest zone of south-west Cameron. International Forestry Review. 5: 106-117.
2. Alexander, S.J., Weber, N.S., Brown, E.D. and Rockwell, V.A. (2002): Mushroom, trees and money: Value
estimates of commercial mushrooms and timber in the Pacific Northwest. Environmental management. 30: 129-
141
3. Dattagupta, S., Gupta, A., and Ghose, M.( 2010): Dependency & usages pattern of NTFPs by forest dwellers of
the Inner Line Reserve Forest of Cachar district of Assam. Assam University Journal of Science & Technology.
6(1):21-27.
4. Dattagupta, S., Gupta, A., Ghose, M. (2014): Diversity of non-timber forest products in Cachar district, Assam,
India. Journal of Forestry Research 25(2):463-470
5. Dutta, T.C., Das, S.M., Roy, A. and Borah, S. (2016): Diversity and utilization of non-timber forest plant
products in forest fringes of Dihing-Patkai Wildlife Sanctuary of Tinsukia district, Assam, India. Presented
Seminar Paper: DST Sponsored National Conference on Current Issues in NTFPs; Organized by Department of
Life Sciences, Assam University Diphu Campus, Assam, India.
6. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). (1995): Non wood forest products for rural income and sustainable
forestry. Non-Wood Forest Products.7:127.Ref ID-16 Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy.
Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep.
7. Gupta, T. and Guleria, A. (1982): Non-wood forest products in India: Economic potentials. Oxford & IBH,
New Delhi.
8. Hegde, R., Suryaprakash, S., Achoth, L., and Bawa, K.S. (1996): Extraction of non-timber forest products in the
forest of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India: 1. Contribution to rural economy. Economic Botany, 50: 243-251
9. Hooker, J. D. (1872-97): Flora of British India. Vol. I- VII; L. Reeve and Company, London.
10. Huntington, H.P. (2000): Using traditional ecological knowledge in Science: Methods and applications.
Ecological Application, 10: 1270-1274
11. Jain, S. K. and Rao, R. R. (1976): A handbook of field and herbarium methods. Today and Tomorrow Printers
and Publishers, New Delhi.
12. Kanjilal, U. N., Kanjilal, P. C. and Das, A. (1934-40): Flora of Assam. Vol. I-IV. Govt. Press. Shillong, India.
13. Mahapatra, A.K. and Mitchell, C.P. (1997): Sustainable development of non-timber forest products -
implication for forest management in India. Forest Ecology & Management, 94: 15-30
14. Martin, G. J. (1995): Ethnobotany: A Method Manual. Chapman and Hall, London.
15. Mishra, M., Kotwal, P.C. and Prasad, C. (2009): Harvesting of medicinal plants in the forest of Central India &
its impact on quality of raw materials: a case of Nagpur District, India. Ecoprint, 16:3-42
16. Nath, P. C., Sarmah, R., Arunachalam, A. and Borbhuiyan, A. R. (2006): NTFP potential and conservation in
Joypur Reserve Forest of Assam. Journal of Non-timber Forest Product, 13(1):17-23
17. Nautiyal, S. and Kaul, A. K. (2003): Non-timber forest products of India. Jeyoti Publisher & distributors,
Dehradun, India.
18. Peters, C. M., Gentry, A. H. and Mendelsohn, R. O. (1989): Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature, 339:
655-656
ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(8), 370-382
382
19. Sarma, D. (2016): Role of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in livelihood of the Tribal community living in
hilly area of Kamrup district, Assam. The Clarion, 5(1):45-49
20. Sarmah, R., and Saikia, A. (2014): Non-Timber forest products: Diversity and used pattern at Majuli the
Brahmaputra River island of Assam, India. Research & Reviews: Journal of Botanical Science. Available at:
http://www.rroij.com
21. UNDP. (2004): The Equator Initiative: Money Grows on Trees. Cameroon Series 5. New York, UNDP.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The Brahmaputra valley is unique in its plant biodiversity. The natives of Majuli dependent on non timber forest products for their daily livelihood needs. The present paper focus on 64 medicinal plant species belongs to 43 families and 22 wild edible plants belonging to 21 families that were used in different activities in day-to-day life
Article
Full-text available
We identified 67 and 21 NTFP-yielding plant and animal species, respectively, in a reserve forest in Cachar district of Assam. We recorded globally threatened species listed by IUCN as Critically Endangered (plant species Dipterocarpus turbinatus), Vulnerable (plant species Aquillaria malaccensis), Endangered (animal species Hoolock hoolock, Indotestudo elongata and Manis pentadactyla), and Vulnerable (animal species Nilssonia hurum and Rusa unicolor). The whole plant or animal and/or their various parts were used as food or medicine, in house construction, magico-religious activities and others. While some NTFPs were harvested throughout the year, others were harvested seasonally. A comprehensive NTFP policy, along with scientific measures for regeneration, restoration and augmentation of NTFP-yielding plants and animals, would help in addressing the conflicting demands of conservation and livelihood in the forests of this area.
Article
Full-text available
Adulteration and substitutions are frequent in raw material trade of medicinal plants. Several studies have been done for a number of important crude drug materials to distinguish the genuine material from adulterant. The efficient way to determine adulteration is through morphological and organoleptic studies. The objective of this study is to find out current harvesting methods, malpractices adopted by various stakeholders and ocular analysis of market samples, impacting quality of raw (dry) produce of selected species in market of Nagpur. In the natural forests Baibirang (Embelia ribes Burm.), Safed musli (mixed tubers of Chlorophytum borivilianum Baker, C. tuberosum Baker.), and Aonla ( Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) were collected just after the rains at unripe stage. The ocular observations of the market sample of Aonla, Baibirang fruits, Safed musli tubers indicate that mixing of old and diseased parts of same species and other adulterants is rampant in the local market. Laboratory analysis shows that in one kilogram of market sample, more than 20% raw material was found adulterated in all the selected species except Bach ( Acorus calamus L.). Most of the selected plants were found adulterated, both intentionally and unintentionally. Major reasons for poor quality are unripe harvesting, mixing of inferior and cheap plant parts, mis-identification of species, non-availability of plant parts in required quantity, etc. Key words: Adulteration, quality, medicinal plants, harvesting, malpractices. DOI: 10.3126/eco.v16i0.3471 ECOPRINT 16: 35-42, 2009
Article
Full-text available
Many claims have been made concerning the use of NTFPs as part of development and conservation strategies. Important amongst these is that because NTFPs play an important part in household incomes they can be used to raise the perceived value of forests and thus provide incentives for more sustainable use of the forest estate. However, migrant communities living around forest margins have often been perceived as groups of people most likely to take advantage of the free goods provided by forests in a way that degrades the forest environment as short term benefits are maximised over long-term sustainability. Empirical evidence from the forest zone of south-west Cameroon suggests that for many migrant communities NTFPs are not a significant part (no more than 6%) of household total income and that poorer groups seek diverse livelihood strategies that are not predicated on natural resource use. Whilst richer groups may continue to rely on sources of income from the forest and NTFPs may make up to 15% of household income, for rich and poor alike the value derived from NTFPs is generated by secondary forest and forest fallow rather than less disturbed forest that has been the focus of conservation interest. The view is put forward that forest managers and international donors interested in conservation and development need to reassess the potential contribution of NTFPs in poverty alleviation strategies, and acknowledge that forest conservation priorities of local communities require policies and management systems focused on 'sustainable systems for production of livelihood benefits' rather than protectionist approaches to areas traditionally defined as valuable forest.
Article
Full-text available
Exploitation of non-wood resources would provide profits while conserving Amazon forests. Yet little is done to promote their development.
Article
Full-text available
It is generally assumed that the sustained extraction and processing of non-timber forest products by local people can enhance their cash income and provide an alternative to tropical deforestation. However, the degree to which such products actually or may potentially contribute to rural incomes is poorly documented. We present the results of a study that seeks to evaluate the reliance of an indigenous group on non-timber forest products for cash income. Furthermore, we examine the effect of household variables on the cash income derived from collection and the price appreciation of non-timber forest prod nets. These products account for nearly half of the gross annual income earned by the Soliga households in the Biligiri Rangan Hills of the Karnataka State in South India. Econometric models indicate that although income derived from the extraction of non-timber forest products is high in proportion to the time devoted to the collection, the extraction is not a preferred vocation. Furthermore, price appreciation for non-timber forest products varies for different products and, overall, the Soligas obtain essentially minimal wages for their extractive efforts. We discuss possible mechanisms for enhancement of Soligas' income and the involvement of Soligas in conservation efforts.
Article
Sustainable exploitation of non-wood forest resources as a means for achieving the complimentary objectives of natural forest conservation and income generation for rural inhabitants has drawn international attention in recent years. Accomplishing these dual goals requires an understanding of how non-timber forest products (NTFP) extraction and marketing functions in the tropical regions. This is often hindered by an absence of basic research and analysis. The paper reviews the prevailing management systems and forest policy in India with a view to examining the problems and prospects for NTFP development. Factors influencing the production of economically important NTFP were determined through a case study and the deficiencies in the existing marketing strategy were analysed. Measures to improve the extraction system for higher returns to both the state forestry sector and primary collectors were highlighted and the need for domestication of NTFP species was stressed.
Article
Wild edible mushrooms are harvested in the forests of the Pacific Northwest, where both trees and mushrooms grow in the same landscape. Although there has been some discussion about the value of trees and mushrooms individually, little information exists about the joint production of, and value for, these two forest products. Through four case studies, the information needed to determine production and value for three wild mushroom species in different forests of the Pacific Northwest is described, and present values for several different forest management scenarios are presented. The values for timber and for mushrooms are site- and species-specific. On the Olympic Peninsula in Washington, timber is highly valued and chanterelles are a low-value product by weight; timber has a soil expectation value (SEV) 12 to 200 times higher than chanterelles. In south-central Oregon, timber and American matsutake mushrooms have the potential to have about the same SEV. In eastern Oregon, timber is worth 20 to 110 times as much as the morels that grow in the forest. Production economics is concerned with choices about how much and what to produce with what resources. The choices are influenced by changes in technical and economic circumstances. Through our description and analysis of the necessary definitions and assumptions to assess value in joint production of timber and wild mushrooms, we found that values are sensitive to assumptions about changes in forest management, yields for mushrooms and trees, and costs.
Dependency & usages pattern of NTFPs by forest dwellers of the Inner Line Reserve Forest of Cachar district of Assam
  • S Dattagupta
  • A Gupta
  • M Ghose
Dattagupta, S., Gupta, A., and Ghose, M.( 2010): Dependency & usages pattern of NTFPs by forest dwellers of the Inner Line Reserve Forest of Cachar district of Assam. Assam University Journal of Science & Technology. 6(1):21-27.