Article

Comparison of Curved and Straight Anchor Insertion for SLAP Repair: A Cadaveric Study

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare a curved drill guide with a straight guide for suture anchor placement into the posterosuperior glenoid from an anterolateral portal with respect to glenoid perforation, drill contact with the suprascapular nerve, and maximum load. Methods: Ten bilateral pairs of fresh human cadaveric shoulders were randomized to the curved technique on 1 side and the straight technique on the contralateral side. An anterolateral trans-rotator cuff portal was used for placement of anchors at the posterior (11 o'clock right shoulder) and far posterior (10 o'clock right shoulder) positions on the glenoid with a 24-mm drill stop, and the drill tip was marked with ink. Specimens were dissected for glenoid perforation and drill contact with the suprascapular nerve. The maximum load of each anchor was measured using a material testing system. Results: Glenoid perforation occurred in 30% in the curved group and 60% in the straight group overall (P = .01). Ink markings demonstrated a direct hit on the suprascapular nerve in most of the penetrations (13 of 18) but was not significantly different between the curved and straight guides (P = .25). Maximum load of the posterior anchor was greater in the curved group than that in the straight group (199.5 vs 146.7 N, respectively; P = .01). Conclusions: The curved technique has a lower rate of glenoid perforation and greater maximum load than the straight technique. However, the curved technique can result in glenoid perforation and injury to the suprascapular nerve, and we do not recommend it. Clinical relevance: Placing suture anchors through an anterolateral portal with a curved guide provides a more optimal trajectory with decreased risk of glenoid perforation and superior biomechanical strength than that with the straight guide, but it is not safe.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... I t was with great interest that we read "Comparison of Curved and Straight Anchor Insertion for SLAP Repair: A Cadaveric Study" by Grieshober, Palmer, Kim, Jaffe, Paryavi, Hasan, and Henn. 1 They performed a cadaveric anatomic and biomechanical study to assess the safety and strength of using the anterolateral portal for posterior anchor placement for SLAP repairs. The study was extraordinarily well performed, and we commend the authors for their work in trying to enhance the safety of anchor placement in the glenoid. ...
... Grieshober et al. 1 cited the work of Sando et al. 2 showing that the anterolateral portal often traverses the supraspinatus tendon. Other authors have advocated a percutaneous posterior portal for anchor placement. ...
... Grieshober et al. 1 did not mention the trajectory of the drill guides and only mentioned that they were placing posterior and far-posterior anchors. When placing the drill guide at the intended anchor position, it is essential to aim toward the center of the glenoid to avoid medial perforation and contact with the suprascapular nerve. ...
Article
The anterosuperior rotator interval portal for SLAP repair anchor placement is the perfect balance between obtaining the proper anchor trajectory and respecting the rotator cuff integrity.
... Difficulties faced in the surgical treatment of SLAP lesions are as follows: technical difficulty of the implantation of the anchors, iatrogenic nerve damage, and medial wall perforation (10). Anatomic studies revealed that the labral attachment of the long head of the biceps tendon was extended approximately 55% to the posterior labrum, 37% to anterior and posterior labrum, and only 8% to the anterior labrum (11). ...
... Suprascapular nerve injury has been reported during anchor placement of the posterior glenoid (12). It has been suggested that at the level of the suprascapular notch, narrow posterosuperior glenoid rim is associated with iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury during arthroscopic repair (10). In a previously performed anatomic cadaveric study in which the anchor placement was carried out using the transmuscular portal, no iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury was reported during the anchor placement to the 12 o'clock position in the glenoid (1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This study aims to investigate the anatomical relationships of the transmuscular portal to its surrounding structures in arthroscopic treatment of superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions in a human cadaveric model. Methods: In this anatomic study, bilateral shoulder girdles of 12 adult formalin embalmed cadavers were used. All cadavers were male, and the mean age was 63.4±7.3 years. The portal entry point was determined as midway between the anterior and posterior borders of the acromion, approximately 1 cm lateral from the edge of the acromion. After a guidewire was placed in the glenoid cavity at the 12 o'clock position where the SLAP lesion typically occurs, a switching stick was inserted there. Each glenoid was then drilled with a 2.4 mm drill through an arthroscopic cannula. Subsequently, anatomical dissection was executed to assess the relationship of the transmuscular portal with the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, supraspinatus tendon, acromion, and biceps tendon. Lastly, the shortest distance between the aforementioned structures with the drill was measured by a sensitive caliper to determine whether there was a penetration of the structures. Differences between the right and left sides were analyzed. Results: The mean distance between the portal and the axillary nerve was 55.5 mm±6.0 mm, and the mean length of the suprascapular nerve was 61.2 mm±7.0 mm. The mean distance between the portal and the supraspinatus tendon was 2.8 mm±1.5 mm. No penetration of the axillary nerve, suprascapular nerve, and supraspinatus tendon was observed in any cadaver. No differences were detected for measured anatomical parameters between the right and left sides (p>0.05). Conclusion: Findings from this cadaveric study revealed that the transmuscular portal may allow for a reliable anchor placement without any nerve or tendon penetration during arthroscopic SLAP repair. Level of evidence: Level V.
... 27 Because of their flexibility, insertion through curved guides is possible, sparing the rotator cuff during arthroscopic repair. 19,39 Drill tunnels needed for the placement of all-suture anchors are distinctly smaller than those used for classic solid suture anchors, thus preserving bone stock and reducing the risk of fracture. 40 In addition, all-suture anchors have been shown to result in satisfactory clinical outcomes 41,42 and postoperative imaging without severe bony reactions after Bankart repair. ...
... 41 A possible disadvantage of using all-suture anchors is that bone tunnels are indeed smaller but also longer (22 mm for 1.8-mm Q-Fix and 23 mm for 1.8-mm FiberTak), thus posing a potential risk of suprascapular nerve injury. 39,43 However, penetration of the drill through the medial cortex was not observed in our study. ...
Article
Background: It is widely accepted that transolecranon fracture-dislocations are not associated with collateral ligament disruption. The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of the collateral ligaments in transolecranon fractures. Methods: Twenty cadaveric elbows with a mean age of 46.3 years were used. All soft tissue was dissected to the level of the capsule, leaving the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) intact. A standardized, oblique osteotomy starting from the distal margin of the cartilage bare area of the ulna was made. The elbows were loaded with an inferiorly directed force of 5 and 10 N in the intact, MCL cut, LCL cut, and both ligaments cut states. All measurements were recorded on lateral calibrated radiographs. Results: Mean inferior translation with intact ligaments (n=20) when the humerus was loaded with 5 and 10 N was 1.52 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 - 2.02) and 2.23 mm (95%, CI 1.61 - 2.85), respectively. When the LCL was cut first (n=10), the inferior translation with 5 and 10 N load was 4.11 mm (95% CI, 0.95 - 7.26) and 4.82 mm (95% CI, 1.91 - 7.72), respectively. When the MCL was cut first (n=10), the inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N was 3.94 mm (95% CI, 0.796 - 7.08) and 5.68 mm (95% CI, 3.03 - 8.33), respectively. Inferior translation when loaded with 5 and 10 N and both ligaments cut was 15.65 mm (95% CI, 12.59 - 18.79) and 17.50 mm (95% CI, 14.86 - 20.13), respectively. There was a statistical difference between the intact and MCL cut first at 10 N and when both ligaments were cut at 5 and 10 N. Conclusions: The findings suggest that collateral ligament disruption is a prerequisite for a transolecranon fracture dislocation. Inferior translation of more than 3 mm suggests that at least one of the collateral ligaments is disrupted, and more than 7.5 mm indicates that both collateral ligaments are disrupted.
... 27 Because of their flexibility, insertion through curved guides is possible, sparing the rotator cuff during arthroscopic repair. 19,39 Drill tunnels needed for the placement of all-suture anchors are distinctly smaller than those used for classic solid suture anchors, thus preserving bone stock and reducing the risk of fracture. 40 In addition, all-suture anchors have been shown to result in satisfactory clinical outcomes 41,42 and postoperative imaging without severe bony reactions after Bankart repair. ...
... 41 A possible disadvantage of using all-suture anchors is that bone tunnels are indeed smaller but also longer (22 mm for 1.8-mm Q-Fix and 23 mm for 1.8-mm FiberTak), thus posing a potential risk of suprascapular nerve injury. 39,43 However, penetration of the drill through the medial cortex was not observed in our study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To compare the biomechanical performance of knotless versus knotted all-suture anchors for the repair of type II SLAP lesions with a simulated peel-back mechanism. Methods Twenty paired cadaveric shoulders were used. A standardized type II SLAP repair was performed using knotless (group A) or knotted (group B) all-suture anchors. The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon was loaded in a posterior direction to simulate the peel-back mechanism. Cyclic loading was performed followed by load-to-failure testing. Stiffness, load at 1 and 2 mm of displacement, load to repair failure, load to ultimate failure, and failure modes were assessed. Results The mean load to repair failure was similar in groups A (179.99 ± 58.42 N) and B (167.83 ± 44.27 N, P = .530). The mean load to ultimate failure was 230 ± 95.93 N in group A and 229.48 ± 78.45 N in group B and did not differ significantly (P = .958). Stiffness (P = .980), as well as load at 1 mm (P = .721) and 2 mm (P = .849) of displacement, did not differ significantly between groups. In 16 of the 20 specimens (7 in group A and 9 in group B), ultimate failure occurred at the proximal LHB tendon. Failed occurred through slippage of the labrum in 1 specimen in each group and through anchor pullout in 2 specimens in group A. Conclusions Knotless and knotted all-suture anchors displayed high initial fixation strength with no significant differences between groups in type II SLAP lesions. Ultimate failure occurred predominantly as tears of the proximal LHB tendon. Clinical Relevance All-suture anchors have a smaller diameter than solid anchors, can be inserted through curved guides, preserve bone stock, and facilitate postoperative imaging. There is a paucity of literature investigating the biomechanical capacities of knotless versus knotted all-suture anchors in type II SLAP repair.
... 9,10 Curved drill guides are proposed to mitigate this concern. Grieshober et al. 11 evaluated curved and straight JuggerKnot 1.5 drill guides in human cadaveric shoulders. Using an anterolateral transrotator cuff portal all-suture anchor placement at the posterior and far posterior positions (11 and 10 o'clock in a right shoulder) resulted in complete glenoid perforation in 30% of curved drill guides and 60% of straight drill guides. ...
... Importantly, 72% of these penetrations hit the suprascapular nerve. 11 The axillary nerve lies 10 mm from the inferior glenoid at the 6 o'clock position. Many surgeons advocate placing an anchor at this low position. ...
Article
All-suture anchors require smaller drill holes (often under 2.0 mm) than comparable solid glenoid anchors (e.g., Gryphon: 2.5-mm drill). A smaller drill allows closer anchor approximation, but there is no indication that this improves repair biomechanics. In fact closely associated multiple fixation points are associated with glenoid fractures, and the same multiple fixation points can be achieved with double- or triple-loaded conventional anchors. All-suture anchors require deployment immediately adjacent to intact cortical bone. Without this, slack and pistoning of the suture ball anchor occur during cyclic loading and have been associated with bone cavitation, repair loosening, and gap formation. A mechanical tensioning mechanism more effectively removes the slack than hand tensioning by the surgeon. Drill length is another concern. All-suture anchor drills measure between 20 and 24 mm long. This length is commonly associated with far cortex penetration and places the suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve at increased risk of contact damage. Maximizing all-suture anchor performance is associated with mechanical deployment systems rather than hand traction applied by the surgeon. Finally, no current all-suture anchor is biodegradable, osteoconductive, or replaced by bone.
... The anatomic course of the nerve passing through the suprascapular and spinoglenoid notches allows vulnerability to traction, compression, or iatrogenic injury. 1,2 In the setting of associated pathology, treatment is focused on the underlying cause, such as rotator cuff repair or labral repair with or without cyst decompression. In the isolated setting without a causative lesion, nonoperative management is the mainstay of treatment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Isolated suprascapular neuropathy that requires surgical decompression is rare. Arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression is an effective treatment for correctly indicated patients, but identifying which patients would benefit from decompression is challenging. While good outcomes and low complication rates after arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression have been reported by expert surgeons, this procedure has potential for neurovascular injury in inexperienced hands. Given the rarity of the condition, the difficulty with accurate diagnosis, and the potential risks from surgical intervention, we believe that these patients are best treated in a tertiary referral practice.
Article
Full-text available
Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions can lead to persistent shoulder instability. While rare, HAGL lesions may present as a concomitant injury following shoulder dislocation events. Traditionally, an open approach has been used to repair the inferior glenohumeral ligament and restore shoulder stability. Modern arthroscopic techniques and instrumentation have permitted a minimally invasive approach for treating HAGL lesions. While technically demanding, arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions has demonstrated favorable outcomes with less soft-tissue disruption. The following Technical Note describes a safe and effective method for the arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions. Our technique highlights the use of the lateral decubitus position, a 70° arthroscope, a curved anchor device, and a 90° SutureLasso device.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: A suprascapular nerve entrapment can occur at the suprascapular notch or at the spinoglenoid notch. So, the size and shape of the suprascapular notch are associated with suprascapular entrapment neuropathy as well as with an injury to the suprascapular nerve in arthroscopic procedures. The knowledge on the variations along the course of the nerve is important in understanding the source of the entrapment syndrome. Material and methods: The present study was carried out on 104 scapulae which were obtained from the Department of Anatomy, NRI Medical College and from other nearby medical colleges. The suprascapular notches in the scapulae were classified, based on the descriptions of Rengachary et al and Ticker et al. The distance between the suprascapular notch and the supraglenoid tubercle, and the distance between the posterior rim of the glenoid cavity and the medial wall of the spinoglenoid notch at the base of the scapular spine, were determined. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: Based on the Rengachary classification, the type III notch was more common. The suprascapular foramen was observed in 2 scapulae. In 56.73% scapulae, the superior transverse diameter was greater than the maximum depth. The U shaped notch (69.23%) was more common. 2.88% and 8.65% scapulae fell short of the mentioned respective safe zone distances from the margin of the glenoid cavity. Conclusion: Such studies may be useful in understanding the role of the notch in causing nerve entrapment and to prevent iatrogenic nerve injuries while posterior approaches are made to the shoulder joint.
Article
Full-text available
The majority of the literature on surgical outcomes of superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repairs has focused on short-term follow-up of 1 to 2 years, not allowing adequate time for full rehabilitation and return to maximum level of competition for all types of athletes. Also, previous studies have concentrated on using questionnaires that primarily evaluate patients' activities of daily living, which do not focus on sport-specific performance. To determine the midterm results of type II SLAP repairs in overhead athletes, focusing primarily on athletic performance as well as activities of daily living. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A retrospective review of 30 overhead athletes, who underwent an arthroscopic superior labral repair for a symptomatic type II SLAP tear between 2002 and 2007, was performed. Our study population included 22 male and 8 female patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 24 years. Twenty-one patients participated in baseball or softball, and the remainder of patients were involved in javelin throwing or tennis. The average follow-up was 3.5 years. The outcome of treatment was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) scoring system, assessing activities of daily living, and the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow (KJOC) score, assessing sport-specific performance. In addition, the length of time to return to sport and the degree of successful performance were evaluated. Repairs resulted in ASES scores comparable with those from prior published studies (average ASES score, 87.9). The KJOC score averaged 73.6. The athletes' perception was that they returned to approximately 84.1% of their preinjury level of function with a mean time to return to play of 11.7 months. There was a significant drop in the ASES to KJOC score for the baseball/softball players (87.9 ± 14.94 and 72 ± 19.24, respectively; P = .006). Patients reported an overall satisfaction rate of 93.3% with the procedure, with the majority being very satisfied. Arthroscopic SLAP repairs show excellent results and a high rate of overall satisfaction; however, the outcomes are less reliable in throwers. The KJOC score provides a more stringent assessment of overhead athletes' function after SLAP repair than the ASES score. Our findings also indicate that SLAP repairs lead to improved shoulder function during routine daily activities but that consistent return to elite throwing sports may still remain somewhat problematic.
Article
Full-text available
Suprascapular nerve entrapment with isolated paralysis of the infraspinatus muscle is uncommon. However, this pathology has been reported in volleyball players. Despite a lack of scientific evidence, excessive strain on the nerve is often cited as a possible cause of this syndrome. Previous research has shown a close association between shoulder range of motion and strain on the suprascapular nerve. No clinical studies have so far been designed to examine the association between excessive shoulder mobility and the presence of this pathology. To study the possible association between the range of motion of the shoulder joint and the presence of suprascapular neuropathy by clinically examining the Belgian male volleyball team with respect to several parameters. An electromyographic investigation, a clinical shoulder examination, shoulder range of motion measurements, and an isokinetic concentric peak torque shoulder internal/external rotation strength test were performed in 16 professional players. The electrodiagnostic study showed a severe suprascapular neuropathy in four players which affected only the infraspinatus muscle. In each of these four players, suprascapular nerve entrapment was present on the dominant side. Except for the hypotrophy of the infraspinatus muscle, no significant differences between the affected and non-affected players were observed on clinical examination. Significant differences between the affected and non-affected players were found for range of motion measurements of external rotation, horizontal flexion and forward flexion, and for flexion of the shoulder girdle (protraction); all were found to be higher in the affected players than the non-affected players. This study suggests an association between increased range of motion of the shoulder joint and the presence of isolated paralysis of the infraspinatus muscle in volleyball players. However, the small number of patients in this study prevents definite conclusions from being drawn.
Article
Full-text available
To discuss a new technique for the surgical treatment of type II SLAP lesions as well as the evaluation of the technique's effectiveness with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Retrospective clinical follow-up study. We present a clinical follow-up of 31 patients who were treated arthroscopically for type II SLAP lesions using a trans-rotator cuff portal at an average follow-up time of 3.7 years. Patients were screened for concomitant procedures including rotator cuff repairs, shoulder stabilizations, thermal capsullographies, and previous surgeries. These patients were subsequently excluded from the study. Patients were given a standard physical examination of the upper extremity at our institution and they completed both the L'Isalata and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaires. All 31 patients identified were available for follow-up at an average time of 3.7 years postoperatively (range, 2.0 to 7.4 years). The average L'Insalata score was 87.0 points (range, 46.1-100 points); the average ASES score was 87.2 points (range, 46.7-100 points). The average pain score was 1.5 (range, 0-5) and only 4 of the 31 patients complained of moderate pain with activity. Sixteen of the 31 patients returned to their preinjury level of sports; 11 of the 31 patients returned to limited activity and 2 patients were inactive at the time of follow-up. Overall satisfaction with the procedure averaged 3.79 points (range, 0-5 points): 22 patients rated overall satisfaction as good or excellent, 6 patients reported a fair outcome, and only 3 patients were unsatisfied with the results of the surgery. One patient who was unsatisfied with the procedure had reinjured his superior labrum and required a second operation. None of the 31 patients had symptoms suggestive of rotator cuff pathology. Of the 30 patients found to have a positive Active Compression test preoperatively, 26 of these patients now had a negative sign. The trans-rotator cuff approach allows for a more optimal placement of a biodegradable fixation device and/or suture anchors into the superior labrum. Furthermore, we believe that this approach does not compromise the function of the rotator cuff. The trans-rotator cuff technique is an effective and safe modality to address superior labral pathology.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of glenoid perforation during SLAP repair for suture anchors placed through an anterolateral portal versus a posterolateral portal of Wilmington. Methods: Ten bilateral cadaveric shoulders were randomized to suture anchor placement through an anterolateral portal on one shoulder and a posterolateral portal on the contralateral shoulder. Anchors were placed into anterior, posterior, and far posterior positions on the glenoid rim (1 o'clock, 11 o'clock, and 10 o'clock positions for right shoulders). The shoulder was then dissected, and the distance from the suture anchor tip to the nerve was measured if perforation occurred. The maximum load and failure mechanism of each anchor was assessed with a materials testing system machine. Results: Only 2 of 20 anchors placed in the posterosuperior glenoid through the posterolateral portal perforated compared with 16 of 20 of the anchors placed through the anterolateral portal (P < .05). The mean distance from the perforated anchor tip to the suprascapular nerve was 2.5 ± 1.4 mm for the anterolateral portal and 4.4 ± 0.6 mm for the posterolateral portal (P = .18). We did not observe a significant difference in biomechanical strength (P > .05). Conclusions: There is a high rate of glenoid perforation in close proximity to the suprascapular nerve when placing anchors in the posterosuperior glenoid through an anterolateral portal. Use of the posterolateral portal results in a much lower incidence of glenoid perforation for anchors placed in the posterosuperior glenoid, but there is a higher risk of glenoid perforation for an anchor placed in the anterosuperior glenoid from the posterolateral portal. Clinical relevance: There is a higher risk of injury to the suprascapular nerve when suture anchors are placed in the posterosuperior glenoid through an anterolateral portal compared with a posterolateral portal for SLAP repair.
Article
We conducted a study to compare a standard anterosuperolateral (ASL) portal with a percutaneous Port of Wilmington (PW) portal for repair of superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears. We hypothesized that anchors placed through the PW portal would be less likely to penetrate the glenoid or injure the suprascapular nerve (SSN). This study used 6 matched-pair cadaveric shoulders. Two anchors were arthroscopically placed posterior to the biceps, at 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock, to simulate a SLAP repair. One set of anchors was placed through an ASL portal and the other through a PW portal. Glenoid vault penetration and distance to SSN were noted. In the ASL portal group, 8 (66.7%) of 12 anchors violated the medial cortex of the glenoid; in the penetration cases, mean distance to SSN was 6.8 mm for 11 o'clock anchors and 4.8 mm for 10 o'clock anchors. In the PW portal group, 2 (16.7%) of 12 anchors violated the medial cortex of the glenoid; in the penetration cases, distance to SSN was 20 mm for the 11 o'clock anchor and 8 mm for the 10 o'clock anchor. The risk of glenoid vault penetration during repair of SLAP tears posterior to the biceps tendon is reduced when a percutaneous posterior approach is used for anchor placement. This approach also directs the anchor away from the SSN.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of injury to the suprascapular nerve during suture anchor placement in the glenoid when using an anterosuperior portal versus a rotator interval portal. Methods: Ten bilateral fresh human cadaveric shoulders were randomized to anchor placement through the anterosuperior portal on one shoulder and the rotator interval portal on the contralateral shoulder. Standard 3 × 14 mm suture anchors were placed in the glenoid rim (1 o'clock, 11 o'clock, and 10 o'clock positions for the right shoulder). The suprascapular nerve was dissected. When glenoid perforation occurred, the distance from the anchor tip to the suprascapular nerve, the distance from the glenoid rim to the suprascapular nerve, and the drill-hole depth at each entry site were recorded. Results: All far-posterior anchors perforated the glenoid rim when using the anterosuperior or rotator interval portal. The distance from the far-posterior anchor tip to the suprascapular nerve averaged 8 mm (range, 3.4 to 14 mm) for the anterosuperior portal and 2.1 mm (range, 0 to 5.5 mm) for the rotator interval portal (P ≤ .001). Conclusions: Using an anterosuperior or rotator interval portal results in consistent penetration of 1 o'clock and 2 o'clock posterior anchors and might place the suprascapular nerve at risk of iatrogenic injury. Based on closer proximity of the anchor tip to the suprascapular nerve, the risk of injury is significantly greater with a rotator interval portal. Clinical relevance: Using a rotator interval portal for suture anchor placement in the posterior aspect of the glenoid rim can lead to a higher likelihood of suprascapular nerve injury.
Article
Tears of the superior labrum (superior labrum anterior and posterior [SLAP] lesions) of the shoulder are uncommon injuries; however, the incidence of surgical correction seems to be increasing. To report the findings of a review of a proprietary descriptive database that catalogs cases for the purpose of board certification on the demographics of SLAP lesion repair. It is the authors' impression that the percentage of cases of SLAP lesion repairs reported by young orthopaedic surgeons is high and that complications associated with this are not insignificant. Cohort study; level of evidence, 3. We searched the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) part II database to evaluate changes in treatment over time and to identify available outcomes and associated complications of arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions. The database was searched for all SLAP lesions (ICD-9 code 840.7) and SLAP repairs (CPT code 29807) for the years 2003 through 2008. Utilization was analyzed by geographic region and was also obtained based on applicant subspecialty declaration. There were 4975 SLAP repairs, representing 9.4% of all applicants' shoulder cases. Mean follow-up was 8.9 weeks because of the time-limited case collection period. There were 78.4% who were men, and 21.6% of patients were women. The percentage of shoulder cases that were SLAP repairs increased over the study period from 9.4% to 10.1% by 2008 (P = .0163). Mean age of male patients was 36.4 ± 13.0 years, with a maximum of 85 years. Mean age of female patients was 40.9 ± 14.0 years, with a maximum of 88 years. Pain was reported as absent in only 26.3% of patients at follow-up and function as normal in only 13.1%. There were 40.1% of applicants who self-reported their patients to have an excellent result. The self-reported complication rate was 4.4%. Declared sports medicine specialists had a higher percentage of SLAP repairs than did general orthopaedic surgeons: 12.4% versus 9.2%. The percentage of shoulder cases that are SLAP repairs reported by the candidates is 3 times the published incidence supported by the current literature. The large number of repairs in middle-aged and elderly patients is concerning. Focusing on educating young orthopaedic surgeons to appropriately recognize and treat symptomatic SLAP lesions may bring the rate of SLAP repairs down.
Article
Suprascapular neuropathy remains a rare, albeit increasingly recognized, diagnosis. Despite its relatively low prevalence, it must be kept in the shoulder surgeon's mind as a potential cause of shoulder pain, particularly in patients where the history, physical examination, and imaging studies do not adequately explain a patient's symptoms or disability. Although challenging to identify, suprascapular neuropathy can be successfully treated. The current literature shows that the location and mechanism of nerve injury are the most important factors guiding management. Different treatment strategies are required, depending on the specific location and type of nerve injury. Controversy regarding if and when to perform an isolated suprascapular nerve release continues. Furthermore, no recommendations regarding suprascapular nerve release in conjunction with rotator cuff repair can be made at this time, and further research is necessary to better delineate the indications in the future.
Article
Suprascapular nerve injury may be a complication during shoulder arthroscopy. Our aim was to verify the reliability of the existing data, assess the differences between scapulae in the 2 genders and in the same subject, obtain a safe zone useful to avoid iatrogenic nerve lesions, and analyze the existing correlations between the scapular dimensions and the safe zone. We examined 500 dried scapulae, measuring 6 distances for each one, referring to the scapular body, glenoid, and the course of the suprascapular nerve, also catalogued according to gender and side. Differences due to gender were assessed comparing mean ± sd of each distance in males and females; paired t test was used to compare distances deriving from each couple. Successively, we calculated our safe zone and Pearson's correlation. We found nonsignificant differences between the right and left distances deriving from each couple; differences due to gender were stated. We defined 3 kinds of safe zones referring to: 500 scapulae; males (139 scapulae) and females (147 scapulae). The correlation indexes calculated between the axis of the scapular body and glenoid, and the posterosuperior distance (referring to the suprascapular nerve) were 0.624, 0.694, 0.675, 0.638; while those with the posterior distance were 0.230, 0.294, 0.232, 0.284. Knowledge of the safe zone, for avoiding suprascapular nerve injury, is important; gender and specific scapular dimensions should be evaluated, as they influence the dimensions of the safe zone. The linear predictors should be used to obtain specific values of the posterosuperior limit in each patient.
Article
The outcomes of combined arthroscopic repairs of a SLAP (superior labral anterior-posterior) lesion and a rotator cuff tear are not known. We compared the outcomes in a cohort of patients who had undergone concomitant arthroscopic repairs of a SLAP lesion and a rotator cuff tear with those in a cohort of patients with a stable biceps anchor who had undergone an isolated rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that the results would be similar between the two cohorts with respect to the range of motion and preoperative and postoperative function. Thirty-four patients (average age, 56.9 years) underwent an arthroscopic repair of an unstable SLAP lesion along with a concomitant arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Twenty-eight patients (average age, 59.6 years) underwent an isolated arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The average durations of follow-up for the two groups were 40.9 and 42.7 months, respectively. All patients in both groups had a symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear for which initial conservative treatment had failed. Patients with advanced supraspinatus fatty infiltration or advanced muscle atrophy were excluded from the study. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores were determined preoperatively and postoperatively, as were measurements of the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation. Dynamometer strength testing was performed on all patients as an adjunct to qualitative assessments, and normalized Constant scores were calculated to perform sex and age-matched functional assessments. In the group treated with concomitant repairs of a SLAP lesion and a rotator cuff tear, the average ASES score improved from 22.6 to 96.4 points and the average normalized Constant score improved from 55.1 to 101.0 points. In the group treated with an isolated arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the average ASES score improved from 34.3 to 92.3 points and the average normalized Constant score improved from 60.7 to 95.8 points. The average preoperative ASES score in the group with the concomitant repairs was significantly worse than that in the group with the isolated rotator cuff repair (p = 0.027). This difference is also probably clinically relevant. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the preoperative normalized Constant scores, but postoperatively the normalized Constant score was significantly higher in the group with the concomitant repairs (p = 0.006). The active range of motion did not differ between the groups, preoperatively or postoperatively. Controversy surrounds the treatment of a SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. This study suggests that, in middle-aged patients, the results of combined SLAP lesion and rotator cuff repair can be comparable with those achieved with rotator cuff repair alone.
Article
Suprascapular neuropathy (SSN) is considered a rare condition, and few studies have analyzed how commonly it is encountered in practice. Electrophysiologic studies are the gold standard for diagnosis; however, there is no consensus on diagnostic criteria. We hypothesized that SSN would be frequently diagnosed by electrophysiologic testing in a subset of patients with specific clinical and radiographic findings suggestive of the pathology. This study characterizes SSN in an academic shoulder referral practice and documents the electrodiagnostic findings that are currently being used to diagnose the condition. A retrospective review of a 1-year period was used to identify all patients who completed electrodiagnostic studies to evaluate the suprascapular nerve. Clinical exam findings and associated shoulder pathology was documented. The specific electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) findings were analyzed. Electrodiagnostic results were available for 92 patients, and 40 (42%) had confirmed SSN. Patients with a massive rotator cuff tear were more likely to have an abnormal study than those without a tear (P = .006). The most common electrodiagnostic abnormalities were abnormal motor unit action potentials (88%), whereas only 33% had evidence of denervation. The average latency in studies reported as diagnostic of SSN was 2.90 ± 0.08 milliseconds for the supraspinatus and 3.78 ± 0.14 milliseconds for the infraspinatus. An electrodiagnostically confirmed diagnosis of SSN was seen in 4.3% of all new patients and in 43% of patients with clinical or radiographic suspicion of SSN. Clinical evaluation may be difficult because other shoulder pathology can have overlapping symptoms. Shoulder surgeons should consider electrophysiologic evaluation of patients with clinical or radiographic signs of SSN and be cognizant of the parameters that constitute an abnormal study.
Article
Although suprascapular nerve injury after SLAP (superior labrum anterior to posterior) repair has rarely been reported, the direction of anchor insertion is toward the suprascapular nerve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of suprascapular nerve injury during the drilling and anchor insertion for anterior SLAP repair. Twelve cadaveric shoulders were mounted in a lateral decubitus position (to mimic actual surgery) and 1 suture anchor for anterior SLAP repair was inserted arthroscopically from the anterior portal at 00:30-1:00 o'clock in right shoulders (11-11:30 in left). Then, cadaveric shoulders were dissected to determine the pathway of suprascapular nerve, the location of suture anchor, and anchor perforation of the glenoid wall. Distances from suprascapular nerve to suture anchor tips (which perforated medial cortex of glenoid)-that is, nerve-anchor interval (NAI)--were measured. Glenoid widths and heights were also measured to evaluate the correlation between glenoid areas and NAI. Depth of drilling was also determined. All suture anchors perforated the glenoid wall. Mean drill depth was 14.2 (±2.8) mm and mean NAI was 3.1 (±2.7) mm. In 4 shoulders, suture anchor tips contacted the suprascapular nerve. The mean height of the glenoid surface was 30.0 mm (±2.5), its mean width was 22.9 mm (±1.9), and its mean area was 2164.3 mm(2) (±334.1). No correlation was found between glenoid areas and NAI (P = .277). Suprascapular nerve lies very close to drilling sites and suture anchors during arthroscopic anterior SLAP repair. The present study cautions that care should be taken when anterior anchors are being inserted.
Article
Although several morphological variations and classification of the suprascapular notch (SSN) were reported in western populations, little attention has been paid to this anatomic issue in the Chinese population. In this research of SSN morphology in Chinese people, 295 specimens of intact dry Chinese adult scapulas were investigated and measured thoroughly and systematically. Morphological features of SSN variations were observed by visual inspection, and correlation parameters of variability and classification were measured in digital images with image processing software and bones with a vernier caliper, respectively. The incidence of different subtypes of SSN classification and comparative analysis of correlation parameters were calculated. It was interesting that a new variable morphology of SSN with a double suprascapular foramen had been found. We found the most prevalent groups were Type II (an incisura that was longer in its transverse diameter) and Type III (an incisura that was longer in its vertical diameter) which accounted for 58.16 and 28.23%, respectively. The circumference and area of Type II and Type III was larger than those of Type IV. The thickness of 1 mm below the lowest point of the SSN ranges from 0.55 to 3.00 mm. Eight cases with a narrow groove on the lowest point of SSN and four cases with bony canals formed by the ossified superior transverse scapular ligament were found. Further, the distance between the SSN and bony landmarks were varied. For AD (the distance between the lowest point of the SSN and the supraglenoid tubercle), Type I was largest, followed by the Type II, Type III, and Type IV. For AE (the distance between the lowest point of the SSN and the base of the spinoglenoid notch), Type IV was the shortest and there was no statistical difference between other types. This study reveals that SSN variations are common in Chinese population. This anatomic information is important in the management of entrapment neuropathy or interventional procedure of the SSN.
Article
The majority of clinical outcome studies of type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair assess patients younger than age 40. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is often recommended for patients older than age 40 with superior labrum-biceps complex injury. There is no difference in patient clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic type II SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Fifty-two patients stratified to groups younger than age 40 (21 patients; average age, 32.9 years) and older than age 40 (31 patients; average age, 55.1 years) were identified at a minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 28 months) after type II SLAP repair by a single surgeon using suture anchors. Outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Society scores (ASES), Short Form-12 scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and visual analog pain scale. At follow-up, there was no statistical difference in visual analog pain scale (P = .16), ASES scores (P = .07), Simple Shoulder Test scores (P =.41), Short Form-12 testing, or range of motion testing. Patients older than age 40 noted their shoulder to be 87% of normal; 26 of 31 (84%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 28 of 31 (90%) would have the surgery again. Patients younger than 40 noted their shoulder to be approximately 89% of normal; 20 of 21 (95%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 18 of 21 (86%) would have the same procedure performed again. Our findings support that arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP repair using suture anchors can yield good to excellent results in patients older and younger than age 40. We found no statistically significant difference in patient outcome scores, satisfaction levels, or willingness to have the same procedure again when comparing arthroscopic SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40.
Article
Suprascapular neuropathy after an arthroscopic repair of a SLAP lesion is theoretically possible, but it has been rarely reported. We present a case of suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch as a complication of an improperly inserted suture anchor after repair of a type II SLAP lesion. The diagnosis was confirmed by the magnetic resonance imaging findings and an electrodiagnostic study, and direct compression of the nerve was visualized under repeat arthroscopy. An anatomic study of the superior glenoid shows that the available bone stock of the superior glenoid rim for the anchor insertion is found to decrease posteriorly. During the repair of a SLAP lesion, surgeons should consider the possibility of an iatrogenic injury to the suprascapular nerve by an improperly inserted suture anchor.
Article
The purpose of this cadaveric anatomic study was to investigate the risk of iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury during the standard drilling techniques in arthroscopic superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) repairs. Cadaveric shoulder girdles were isolated and drilled at the glenoid peripheral rim by use of standard arthroscopic equipment reproducing common drill locations and portal orientations for SLAP repairs. Drill hole depth was determined by the manufacturer's drill stop (20 mm), and any subsequent drill perforations through the medial bony surface of the glenoid were directly confirmed by dissection. The suprascapular nerve was then isolated to note the presence of any observable direct nerve injury from the drilling. The bone tunnel depth, subsequent distance to the suprascapular nerve, scapular height and width, and humeral length were also recorded. Eighteen drill perforations through the medial glenoid wall occurred in 8 of 21 cadavers (38%). Twelve perforations occurred through anterosuperior drill holes with only one associated nerve injury. Six perforations occurred through low posterosuperior drill holes with four associated nerve injuries. Five of the six shoulders with low posterosuperior perforation also had an associated anterior perforation. No perforations occurred through high posterosuperior drill holes. Of the specimens, 5 had bilateral involvement (4 female and 1 male). Specimens with a perforation had a significantly shorter scapular height (P = .007) and humeral length (P = .01). The suprascapular nerve is at risk for direct injury during arthroscopic SLAP repairs from penetration of the medial glenoid with arthroscopic drill equipment in cadavers.
Article
Lesions of the superior glenoid labrum and biceps anchor are a well-recognized cause of shoulder pain. Advances in shoulder arthroscopy have led to improvements in recognizing and managing superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears. Recent biomechanical studies have postulated several theories for the pathogenesis of SLAP tears in throwing athletes and the effect of these injuries on normal shoulder kinematics. Advances in soft-tissue imaging techniques have resulted in improved accuracy in diagnosing SLAP tears. However, the diagnosis of clinically relevant SLAP tears remains challenging because of the lack of specific examination findings and the frequency of concomitant shoulder injuries. Definitive diagnosis of suspected SLAP tears is confirmed on arthroscopic examination. Advances in surgical techniques have made it possible to achieve secure repair in selected patterns of injury. Recent outcomes studies have shown predictably good functional results and an acceptable rate of return to sport and/or work with arthroscopic treatment of SLAP tears.
Article
Thirty-one shoulders in eighteen cadavera were dissected to allow study of the neurovascular anatomy of the rotator cuff and to help determine the limits of mobilization of the cuff for the repair of chronic massive retracted tears. The dissection demonstrated the diameter, length, and relationships of the suprascapular nerve and its branches and made clear the dangers of extensive mobilization and advancement of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. The suprascapular nerve ran an oblique course across the supraspinatus fossa, was relatively fixed on the floor of the fossa, and was tethered underneath the transverse scapular ligament. In twenty-six (84 per cent) of the thirty-one shoulders, there were no more than two motor branches to the supraspinatus muscle, and the first was always the larger of the two. In twenty-six (84 per cent) of the thirty-one shoulders, the first motor branch originated underneath the transverse scapular ligament or just distal to it. In one shoulder (3 per cent), the first motor branch passed over the ligament. The average distance from the origin of the long tendon of the biceps to the motor branches of the supraspinatus was three centimeters. In fifteen (48 per cent) of the thirty-one shoulders, the infraspinatus muscle had three or four motor branches of the same size. The average distance from the posterior rim of the glenoid to the motor branches of the infraspinatus muscle was two centimeters. The motor branches to the supraspinatus muscle were fewer, usually smaller, and significantly shorter than those to the infraspinatus muscle. The standard anterosuperior approach allowed only one centimeter of lateral advancement of either tendon and limited the ability of the surgeon to dissect safely beyond the neurovascular pedicle. The advancement technique of Debeyre et al., or a modification of that technique, permitted lateral advancement of each muscle of as much as three centimeters and was limited by tension in the motor branches of the suprascapular nerve. In some situations, the safe limit of advancement may be even less. We concluded that lateral advancement of the rotator cuff is limited anatomically and may place the neurovascular structures at risk.
Article
A specific pattern of injury to the superior labrum of the shoulder was identified arthroscopically in twenty-seven patients included in a retrospective review of more than 700 shoulder arthroscopies performed at our institution. The injury of the superior labrum begins posteriorly and extends anteriorly, stopping before or at the mid-glenoid notch and including the "anchor" of the biceps tendon to the labrum. We have labeled this injury a "SLAP lesion" (Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior). There were 23 males and four females with an average age of 37.5 years. Time from injury to surgery averaged 29.3 months. The most common mechanism of injury was a compression force to the shoulder, usually as the result of a fall onto an outstretched arm, with the shoulder positioned in abduction and slight forward flexion at the time of the impact. The most common clinical complaints were pain, greater with overhead activity, and a painful "catching" or "popping" in the shoulder. No imaging test accurately defined the superior labral pathology preoperatively. We divided the superior labrum pathology into four distinct types. Treatment was performed arthroscopically based on the type of SLAP lesion noted at the time of surgery. The SLAP lesion, which has not been previously described, can be diagnosed only arthroscopically and may be treated successfully by arthroscopic techniques alone in many patients.
Article
Tears of the glenoid labrum were observed in 73 base ball pitchers and other throwing athletes who under went arthroscopic examination of the dominant shoul der. Most of the tears were located over the anterosu perior portion of the glenoid labrum near the origin of the tendon of the long head of the biceps muscle into the glenoid. At arthroscopy, the tendon of the long head of the biceps appeared to originate through and be continuous with the superior portion of the glenoid labrum. In many cases it appeared to have pulled the anterosuperior portion of the labrum off the glenoid. This observation was verified at arthroscopy by viewing the origin of the biceps tendon into the glenoid labrum as the muscle was electrically stimulated. With stimulation of the mus cle, the tendinous portion became quite taut, particu larly near its attachment to the glenoid labrum, and actually lifted the labrum off the glenoid. Three-dimensional high-speed cinematography with computer analysis revealed that the moment acting about the elbow joint to extend the joint through an arc of about 50° was in excess of 600 inch-pounds. The extremely high velocity of elbow extension which is generated must be decelerated through the final 30° of elbow extension. Of the muscles of the arm that provide the large deceleration forces in the follow-through phase of throwing, only the biceps brachii traverses both the elbow joint and the shoulder joint. Additional forces are generated in the biceps tendon in its function as a "shunt" muscle to stabilize the glenohumeral joint during the throwing act. On the basis of our observations that (1) the biceps tendon is subjected to large forces during throwing, (2) most tears of the glenoid labrum occur at the antero superior portion near the origin of the biceps tendon, and (3) the biceps tendon lifts the labrum off the glenoid when its muscle is stimulated, we believe that the tendon of the long head of the biceps may be a cause of tearing of the glenoid labrum in the throwing athlete.
Article
Progress in shoulder arthroscopy has led to the identification of previously undiagnosed lesions involving the superior labrum and the biceps tendon anchor. Additional research has substantiated the role of the long head of the biceps tendon in anterior and rotational glenohumeral stability. Careful attention to the history and physical examination and directed diagnostic imaging may arouse suspicion of injury to the biceps tendon and the superior labral complex. Identification of injuries to the superior labrum extending from anterior to posterior, or "SLAP" injuries, can be made with diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy. Appropriate treatment can then be based on the type of lesion encountered (generally, debridement of most type I and III lesions and repair of type II and many type IV lesions).
Article
One hundred two type II SLAP lesions without associated anterior instability, Bankart lesion, or anterior inferior labral pathology were surgically treated under arthroscopic control. There were three distinct type II SLAP lesions based on anatomic location: anterior (37%), posterior (31%), and combined anterior and posterior (31%). Preoperatively, the Speed and O'Brien tests were useful in predicting anterior lesions, whereas the Jobe relocation test was useful in predicting posterior lesions. Rotator cuff tears were present in 31% of patients and were found to be lesion-location specific. In posterior and combined anterior-posterior lesions, a drive-through sign was always present (despite absence of anterior-inferior labral pathology or a Bankart lesion) and was eliminated by repair of the posterior component of the SLAP lesion. We conclude that SLAP lesions with a posterior component develop posterior-superior instability that manifests itself by a secondary anterior-inferior pseudolaxity (drive-through sign), and that chronic superior instability leads to secondary lesion-location-specific rotator cuff tears that begin as partial thickness tears from inside the joint.
Article
Fifty-two shoulders in 26 cadavers were dissected to evaluate the safe zone for avoiding injury of the suprascapular nerve during open surgical procedures and arthroscopic Bankart repairs requiring blind drilling. The course of the suprascapular nerve was given as the shortest distance between the suprascapular nerve and the glenoid rim. A Kirschner wire was inserted from the anterior glenoid rim toward the suprascapular nerve. The insertion angle toward the suprascapular nerve at the base of the scapular spine in the transverse plane averaged 37.0 degrees and in the sagittal plane averaged 17.5 degrees. The insertion angle toward the bifurcation of the infraspinatus motor branch in the transverse plane averaged 44.3 degrees and in the sagittal plane averaged 27.7 degrees. On the basis of the results of the anatomic evaluation, the safe zone was described. An appreciation of this safe zone may help shoulder surgeons avoid iatrogenic injury to the suprascapular nerve.
Article
The authors report an 87% rate of return to preinjury levels of throwing in 54 baseball players and an 84% rate of return to preinjury performance levels in pitches after repair of type II SLAP lesions. The etiology, biomechanics, surgical repair, and rehabilitation are discussed in detail.
Article
Rotator cuff tears, Bankart lesions, and superior labral anterior posterior lesions commonly occur in isolation, but there is a subgroup of patients who experience combined injuries. Prior studies have excluded such patients as confounding groups. In patients with combined lesions of the labrum and rotator cuff, arthroscopic repair of both lesions will restore range of motion and stability and provide good clinical results. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of a series of patients with combined rotator cuff and labral (Bankart or superior labral anterior posterior) lesions treated arthroscopically. Thirty patients (average age, 47.8 years) with combined rotator cuff and labral lesions were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 2.7 years (range, 24-54 months). Sixteen patients had Bankart lesions and 14 patients had SLAP lesions. Significant improvements in forward flexion (20.5 degrees, P = .005), external rotation (9.0 degrees, P = .008), and internal rotation (2 vertebral levels, P = .016) were observed. The mean L'Insalata and American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores for all patients were 92.9 and 94.3, respectively. Twenty-seven (90%) patients reported satisfaction as good to excellent, and 23 of 30 (77%) returned to their preinjury level of athletics. Two patients suffered recurrent rotator cuff tears. In patients with rotator cuff and labral lesions, arthroscopic treatment of both lesions yields good clinical outcomes, restoration of motion, and a high degree of patient satisfaction.
Article
The purpose of this study was to compare the 3 different fixation methods of posterior type superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) II lesion. Fifteen cadavers were randomly divided into 3 groups to compare the initial strength of 3 different fixation methods in posterior type II SLAP lesions. Group I used 1 anchor for 1-point fixation with a conventional simple suture; group II used 1 anchor passing both limbs through the posterior-superior labrum in a mattress fashion; and group III used 2 anchors for 2-point fixation with conventional simple sutures. Repair failure (2 mm permanent displacement of repaired site) and ultimate failure were measured. The mean load to (clinical) failure was 156 +/- 22 N in group I, 117 +/- 33 N in group II, and 161 +/- 44 N in group III. The mean load to ultimate failure was 198 +/- 6 N in group I, 189 +/- 23 N in group II, and 179 +/- 22 N in group III. The specimen stiffness was equivalent among groups. In mode of failure, clinical failure (more than 2 mm separations) first occurred between the markers on the biceps tendon just above (A) and below (B) compared to other markers, and ultimate failure occurred at the labral-implant interface. A single simple suture anchor repair in posterior type II SLAP seems sufficient to withstand the initial load without clinical failure. A mattress suture, although it anchors the biceps root, seems to be inferior than simple suture technique.
Article
There are numerous accessory portals for the arthroscopic repair of superior labral anterior and posterior lesions. Many surgeons are reluctant to make a portal through the cuff because of concern about iatrogenic injury to the cuff. An arthroscopic superior labral anterior and posterior lesion repair procedure using the trans-rotator cuff portal may yield favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, and cuffs may heal properly. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Fifty-eight consecutive patients undergoing superior labral anterior and posterior lesion repair using the trans-rotator cuff portal, who had available both functional and radiological outcomes after 1 year of the operation, were enrolled. We evaluated the structural outcomes for the labrum and cuff using computed tomographic arthrography and measured various clinical outcomes (the supraspinatus power, visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder evaluation form, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test) at the final visit. All functional outcomes were improved significantly (P < .001). On computed tomographic arthrography, labral healing to the bony glenoid was achieved in all patients. Subacromial leakage of contrast media was observed in 3 patients (5.2%) through the muscular portion without any retraction or gap of the tendon. Two of 3 had preoperative cuff pathologic changes, and they were older than 45 years of age. Partial articular cuff tears were observed in 6 patients (10.3%), and 4 had the lesion preoperatively. There were no statistical differences in functional scores according to the presence of preoperative lesion, postoperative leakage, or partial cuff tear. The data demonstrate favorable outcomes for arthroscopic superior labral anterior and posterior lesion repair using the trans-rotator cuff portal. We suggest that the trans-rotator cuff portal is an efficient and safe portal for superior labral anterior and posterior lesion repair, although there are some valid concerns of damaging the cuff in patients with a superior labral anterior and posterior lesion with concurrent cuff disorders, as well as in older patients.
Suprascapular nerve injury during arthroscopic superior labral repair: A prospective evaluation.
  • Bouliane M.
  • Beupre L.
  • Ashworth N.
  • Lambert R.
  • Silveira A.
  • Sheps D.M.
The effect of age on the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior and posterior lesions.
  • J M Alpert
  • T H Wuerz
  • T F Donnell
  • K M Carroll
  • N N Brucker
  • T J Gill