ArticlePDF Available
Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
Introduction
Sequestration in its concept is very complex which has been
applicable to rates though vary greatly in consideration of age,
composition, location of any forests and soil type. This provoking
presentation seeks to question and recapture the view of how much
CO2 does a tree take up? The emergence of climate change and global
warming has been identied by scientist and occur frequently. This
phenomenon is been triggered by anthropogenic (human) activities
thereby the discharge of large amounts of greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere. In a general scientic term, one way of reducing the
emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is to store carbon
or CO2 in any medium other than the atmosphere. The biological and
geological mediums are two major and vast different ways of carbon
sequestration. Land and forests have been accounted huge potential
source of storing and referred as natural scrubbers or natures “carbon
sinks”. The process of photosynthesis permits green plants to uptake
CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into organic carbon as they
grow and in turn organic carbon is converted back to CO2 when it
is eaten or decomposed known as the process of respiration. This
is to say, activities that increase photosynthesis and/or decreases
respiration is regarded of great advantage in the global carbon
reduction. Terrestrial and mostly trees (plants) store the most carbon
because of large volume storage and long–lived storage. Various parts
of plants as trunks, leaves, wood, roots as well as the soil in which
the plants are xed as do not decompose or burn, stores carbon from
the atmosphere. Plants of all categories as well as non tilled elds
and grasslands are carbon sinks and storage and thereby store organic
carbon in the soil. On global rating, soil carbon sequestration could
offset as much as 15 percent of fossil fuel emissions. This mini review
paper hereby supports activities that have carbon sinking benets such
as improved soil quality, increased crop yields, and some wildlife
habitat conservation approaches.
Problem signicant
The critical concern on the role of soil and forests in the
global carbon budget and effects of carbon sequestration has been
incorporated in international treaties. In Article 3.4 of the Kyoto
protocol, soil and forests has been identied as a potential sink of
carbon which various nations tends to establish greenhouse gas
inventories and carbon management authorities. This review paper
is signicant in understanding the potential for forests to sequester
carbon as a major terrestrial sequestration agent. The main factors of
C disturbance include forest management, res, oods, deforestation,
reforestation, agricultural practices and drainage.
Theoretical methods
Key denitions of carbon sequestration were presented. Theories
in calculation from plant growth stages and maple–beech–birch forests
and white and red pine forests (25 and 120 years) while reecting to
world agro forestry sequestration calculation.
Estimates of amount of CO sequestered annually by
plants
Tropical climates support greatly the sequestration of atmospheric
carbon dioxide and documented at an average of 50 pounds of carbon
dioxide per tree per year. It is provoking that not much research and
investigation has been conducted on plant species especially in the
tropical forests. Generally, the rate of carbon sequestration depends
on plant growth characteristics of individual tree species, the density
of the tree’s wood, and the conditions for growth where the tree is
planted and plant stage–that is to say the greatest sequestration stage
is in the younger stages of tree growth, between 20 to 50 years.1 A
rough calculation and estimate the amount of CO2 sequestered in a
given tree.
Forest Res Eng Int J. 2018;2(3):148150. 148
© 2018 Toochi . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry
sequester CO2?
Volume 2 Issue 3 - 2018
Egbuche Christian Toochi
Department of Forestry and Wildlife Technology, Federal
University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria
Correspondence: Egbuche Christian Toochi, Department
of Forestry and Wildlife Technology, Federal University of
Technology Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria,
Email ctoochi@yahoo.co.uk
Received: March 03, 2018 | Published: May 31, 2018
Abstract
This mini paper reviewed key principles of carbon sequestration in the concept and
quest to understand that land and forests have been accounted huge potential source
of storing and referred as natural scrubbers or natures “carbon sinks”. Generally,
in scientific term, one way of reducing the emissions of carbon dioxide into the
atmosphere is to store carbon or CO2 in any medium other than the atmosphere.
This paper outlines the main definition and estimates of amount of CO sequestered
annually by plants while determining the total (green) weight of the tree, determine the
weight of carbon in the tree and the weight of carbon dioxide sequestered in the tree.
Prominent evaluation examples involve maple–beech–birch forests and white and red
pine forests (25 and 120 years) while reflecting to world agro forestry sequestration
calculation. Furthermore, the paper discusses the key process of trees as collectors of
CO2: chemistry of the action. The mini review concludes the assertion and supported
by UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) and the global order of
Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM).
Keywords: carbon sequestration, forestry, carbon dioxide, carbon sinks, UNFCC
and CDM
Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal
Mini Review Open Access
Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2? 149
Copyright:
©2018 Toochi
Citation: Toochi EC. Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2?. Forest Res Eng Int J. 2018;2(3):148150.
DOI: 10.15406/freij.2018.02.00040
Denition
T (CO2)/tage, = Arate
T(CO2)–estimated amount of CO2 sequestered in a given tree
/tage–divide by the age of the particular tree
Arate–annual sequestration rate.
In considering the various mechanisms of understanding carbon
sequestration in plant species, some basic student learning process
identied in determining carbon sequestration capacity in any given
tree species2 as in Figure 1.
Figure 1 The various mechanisms of understanding carbon sequestration in
plant species, some basic student learning process identied in determining
carbon sequestration capacity.
Determine the total (green) weight of the tree
Depending on the tree species,2 a simple algorithm can be applied
to weigh any tree species as below
W = Above–ground weight of the tree in pounds
D = Diameter of the trunk in inches
H = Height of the tree in feet
Determine the weight of carbon in the tree
The average carbon content is generally 50% of the tree’s total
volume.3 Therefore, in determining the weight of carbon in the tree,
multiply the dry weight of the tree by 50%.
Determine the weight of carbon dioxide sequestered
in the tree
Chemical composition of CO2 means and that composed of
one molecule of Carbon and 2 molecules of Oxygen. The atomic
weight of Carbon is 12.001115. The atomic weight of Oxygen is
15.9994. In line with the documentaries of4,5 the weight of CO2 in
trees is determined by the ratio of CO2 is C+2*O=43.999915 to C is
43.999915/12.001115=3.6663 therefore, to determine the weight of
carbon dioxide sequestered in the tree, multiply the weight of carbon
in the tree by 3.6663.
Northeast, maple–beech–birch forests
a) 25 year old forest: 12,000lbs of carbon/25 = 480 lbs of C per acre
per year x 44/12 =1,760lbs of CO2 per acre per year
b) 120 year old forest: 128,000lbs of carbon/120 = 1,066 lbs of C
per year per acre x 44/12 =3,909lbs of CO2 per acre per year
c) 25 year old forest: 1,760lbs of CO2 per acre per year/700 trees
= average of 2.52lbs of CO2 per tree per year (rounded to 3
lbs)
d) 120 year old forest: 3,909lbs of CO2 per year per acre =
average of 5.58lbs of CO2 per tree per year
Northeast, white and red pine forests
i. 25 year old forest: 67,000 lbs of carbon/25 = 2,680 lbs of C per
acre per year x 44/12 = 9,826 lbs of CO2 per acre per year / 700
= average of 14 lbs of CO2 per year per tree (rounded to 15 lbs)
ii. 120 year old forest: 246,000 lbs of carbon/120 = 2,050 lbs of C
per acre per year x 44/12 = 7,516 lbs of CO2 per acre per year /
700 = average of 11.7 lbs of CO2 per year per tree.
Source: Forests and Global Change,6 world Agroforestry Centre’s
“Agroforestry Database” and how much a Calliandra calothyrsus
might sequester in a year. This is based on an extension publication
from the University of Nebraska.7
Note: Tree density varies, and an average is always taken in
trees per acre (from DOE’s “Sector–Specic Issues and Reporting
Methodologies Supporting the General Guidelines for the Voluntary
Reporting of Greenhouse Gases under Sections 1605(b) of the Energy
Policy Act of 1992”)
Discussion
The process of trees as collectors of CO2: chemistry
of the action
All green plants, trees assimilate CO2 from the atmosphere through
the process of photosynthesis. The simple sugar molecules that are
initially formed from CO2 are then combined to produce cellulose,
as well as lignin in the case of woody plant organs. Much of the
carbon that is assimilated through photosynthesis is released again
as CO2 through respiration–the energy costs associated with growth
maintenance of living material. The remaining carbon is allocated
to leaf, root, seed, and wood and branch biomass. At an annual
timescale, the carbon associated with short–lived components of
woodland is returned to the atmosphere through decomposition, with
only a proportion of xed carbon being retained in the longer term as
wood. The process of photosynthesis converts two chemicals; carbon
dioxide and water into simple carbohydrates, using sunlight as the
energy source. The process takes place within the leaf and other green
surfaces of plants. However, only part of the radiant energy from the
sun is used in this way. At best, a plant can convert only about 6%
of the total incoming radiation into stored energy. Water enters the
plant mainly through the roots and brings with it essential nutrients.
Carbon dioxide enters as a gas, mainly through holes (stomata) on
plant leaves. Stomata open in response to light, but close in the dark
and in response to adverse conditions such as lack of water or high
temperature. When a crop is growing vigorously and other constraints,
a daily inow, via the stomata, of over 150kg/ha carbon dioxide is
needed. The amount contained in the air above the crop to a height of
over 20 meters. Water is lost from plants while the stomata are open,
sometimes over 100t/ha each day.
Conclusion
It is noted that Kyoto protocol 1979 stated the need for terrestrial
ecosystems especially growing trees to sequester carbon. Different
vegetation and plant species, soils and forest management regimes
inuences the potential of trees in their capacity to sequester carbon.
The increasing climate change scenario and warmer climatic condition
as well as human anthropogenic activities have positioned climate and
global change ecology as an agenda. This assertion was supported
Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2? 150
Copyright:
©2018 Toochi
Citation:Toochi EC. Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2?. Forest Res Eng Int J. 2018;2(3):148150.
DOI: 10.15406/freij.2018.02.00040
by UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC)
and the global order of Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM).
Furthermore, this presentation is response to the provoking demand
for basic knowledge for carbon sequestration in the context of how
much forestry has contributed in CO2 management. IPCC also took
cognisance of land use, soil management, and forestry as effective
means for global carbon emissions. Brown et al.,8 documented that
global forestation programs 345 million ha of plantation and agro
forestry would account to 60–87Gtc equivalent to 12–15 percent
of cumulated fossil fuel and deforestation emissions. Generally, it
is accepted that trees do sequester carbon. Forestry poses a strong
potential as a means of mitigating measure of greenhouse effect.
Climate change, re and forest owners also constitute a burden to
forest sequestration capacity of CO2. Salient factors from carbon
sequestration and forestry are as follows:
i. Forest as a potential carbon scrubber is considered to be cost
effective
ii. Tropical forest may absorb more CO2
iii. Proper land and forest management supports larger terrestrial CO2
sink thereby supports afforestation
iv. Fast growing vegetation species and fertile lands are major benets
for CO2.
v. Generally, forestry in relative terms abates climate change, gas
emissions and absorbs larger chunk of CO2.
Recommendation
This review paper provides an appropriate platform for the
development of eld based research project thereby a major support
to knowledge and scientic understanding of CO2 sequestration.
Conict of interest
Author declares there is no conict of interest.
Disclaimer
This Mini–Review attracted some calculation methodology in
which practitioners have identied the complexity of accounting and
calculating the carbon sequestration by trees in an annual rate rather
this has provided some useful insight of understanding that trees do
sequester carbon. The author acknowledges all authors, websites and
institutions that provided these basic calculation and information
meant for more contribution to knowledge especially in this era of
global change ecology.
References
1. http://www.rcfa–cfan.org/english/issues.13.html
2. Clark A, Saucier JR, McNab WH. Total–Tree Weight, Stem Weight, and
Volume Tables for Hardwood Species in the Southeast. USA: Georgia
Forestry Commission; 1986. p. 1–52.
3. De Wald S, Josiah S, Erdkamp B. Heating With Wood: Producing,
Harvesting and Processing Firewood. USA: University of Nebraska–
Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources;
2005.
4. http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/Sites/TreeDBS/aft.asp
5. Birdsey RA. Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest
Ecosystems. USA: General Technical Report (GTR); 1992.
6. Sampson N, Hair D. Forests and Global Change: Forest management
opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions. USA: American Forests;
1996.
7. Myers N, Goreau TJ. Tropical Forests and the Greenhouse Effect: A
Management Response. Jamaica: University of the West Indies; 1991.
8. Brown S, Sathaye J, Cannell MGR. Management of forest for
mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. In climate change 1995
Impacts, Adaptation and mitigation of climate change. In: Watson RT,
et al. editors. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 773–797.
... The carbon sequestration rate depends on plant growth, individual characteristics of the tree species, the wood density, and its growing conditions. Trees store most of the atmospheric carbon because of their larger size, volume, and longlived storage capacities, i.e., tree trunks, leaves, roots, and the soils in which they exist (16). Carbon sequestration is mainly driven through huge tree biomasses (17). ...
... Degraded forests lead to low carbon storage and poor biodiversity, which in turn cause global warming and climatic changes (20). Anthropogenic activities drastically add massive amounts of greenhouse gases, mainly CO 2, into the atmosphere (16). The rapid increase in the concentration of CO 2 , methane, and methane dioxide is the major cause of global warming (21). ...
... The average carbon content in the tree is generally 50% of the total tree volume (16,37). Thus, we determined the weight of carbon in the tree by multiplying the tree's dry weight by 50% or 0.5. ...
Article
Full-text available
A high amount of CO2 causes numerous health effects, including headaches, restlessness, difficulty in breathing, increased heart rate, high blood pressure, asphyxia, and dizziness. This issue of increasing atmospheric CO2 can only be solved via above-ground and below-ground carbon sequestration (CS). This study was designed to determine the relationship between CS with the crown area (CA), diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H), species richness (SR), and elevation in different forest types of Pakistan with the following specific objectives: (1) to quantify the direct and indirect relationship of carbon sequestration with CA, DBH, H, and SR in various natural forest types and (2) to evaluate the effect of elevation on the trees functional traits and resultant CS. We used the linear structural equation model (SEM) for each conceptual model. Our results confirmed that the highest CS potential was recorded for dry temperate conifer forests (DTCF) i.e., 52.67%, followed by moist temperate mix forests (MTMF) and sub-tropical broad-leaved forests (STBLF). The SEM further described the carbon sequestration variation, i.e., 57, 32, 19, and 16% under the influence of CA (β = 0.90 and P-value < 0.001), H (β = 0.13 and p-value = 0.05), DBH (β = 0.07 and p-value = 0.005), and SR (β = −0.55 and p-value = 0.001), respectively. The individual direct effect of SR on carbon sequestration has been negative and significant. At the same time, the separate effect of CA, DBH, and H had a positive and significant effect on carbon sequestration. The remaining 20% of CS variations are indirectly influenced by elevation. This means that elevation affects carbon sequestration indirectly through CA, DBH, H, and SR, i.e., β = 0.133 and P-value < 0.166, followed by β = 0.531 and P-value < 0.001, β = 0.007 and P-value < 0.399, and β = −0.32 and P-value < 0.001, respectively. It is concluded that abiotic factors mainly determined carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems along with the elevation gradients in Pakistan. Quantifying the role of various forest types in carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction leads to improved air quality, which positively impacts human health. This is an imperative and novel study that links the dynamics of the biosphere and atmosphere.
... Forest resources are pivotal in building ecosystems and improving carbon sink capacity (Song et al., 2011). Forests absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, which is one of the important ways to capture and store carbon in the air (Toochi, 2018). ...
... Carbon sinks mainly refer to the carbon absorbed and stored by forests or the ability of forests to absorb and store carbon dioxide (Toochi, 2018). Table 5 shows the results of the impact of forest resource abundance on carbon sequestration per GDP. ...
... Subsequently, it 31 is paramount to conduct an explicit investigation into the methods and procedures for 32 quantifying carbon sinks. Generally, the above-ground dry biomass holds about 50% of 33 carbon; as such, a friction factor of 0.5 is commonly used for converting AGB into carbon 34 concentration [4][5]. more accurate [6], still, they are also way more time-consuming, laborious, challenging 38 to implement in inaccessible areas, and destructive in nature [7]. ...
... Then, for each patch, the average AGB value expressed in tonnes 325 per hectare was taken, which, when multiplied by 1 hectare, which is the extent of the 326 patch, yields a value in tonnes. These values were summed over all patches, and the final 327 result multiplied by 0.5 [4][5] to obtain the value of absorbed carbon in tonnes. From 328 this procedure, the estimate of the Carbon stock for Astroni on 31 May 2017 was 18748 329 tons, in line with the forecast of [38], which is 22173 ± 7054 tons for phytomass in the year 330 2016. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has recently established the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) program that requires countries to report their carbon emissions and sink estimates through national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGI). Thus, developing automatic systems capable of estimating the carbon absorbed by forests without in-situ observation becomes essential. To support this important need, in this work we introduce ReUse, a simple but effective deep-learning approach to estimate the carbon absorbed by forest areas based on remote sensing. The novelty of the proposed method is in the use of the public above-ground biomass (AGB) data from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative Biomass project as ground truth to estimate the carbon sequestration capacity of any portion of land on Earth using Sentinel-2 images and a pixel-wise Regressive UNet. The approach has been compared to two literature proposals, using a private dataset and human-engineered features. The results show a greater generalization ability of the proposed approach, with a decrease in Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error, respectively, of 16.9 and 14.3 in the area of Vietnam and 4.7 and 5.1 in the area of Myanmar over the runner-up. Finally, as a case study, we reported an analysis made for the Astroni area, a nature reserve located near the metropolitan area of Naples in southern Italy, struck by a large fire, producing predictions consistent with values found by experts in the field. These results further support the use of such an approach for the early detection of AGB variations, both in urban and rural areas.
... Subsequently, it is paramount to conduct an explicit investigation into the methods and procedures for quantifying carbon sinks. Generally, the above-ground dry biomass holds about 50% of carbon; as such, a friction factor of 0.5 is commonly used for converting AGB into carbon concentration [4,5]. ...
... Then, for each patch, the average AGB value expressed in tons per hectare was taken, which, when multiplied by 1 hectare, which is the extent of the patch, yields a value in tons. These values were summed over all patches, and the final result was multiplied by 0.5 [4,5] to obtain the value of absorbed carbon in tons. From this procedure, the estimate of the carbon stock for Astroni on 31 May 2017 was 18,748 tons, in line with the forecast of [38], which is 22,173 ± 7054 tons for phytomass in the year 2016. ...
Article
Full-text available
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has recently established the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) program, which requires countries to report their carbon emissions and sink estimates through national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGI). Thus, developing automatic systems capable of estimating the carbon absorbed by forests without in situ observation becomes essential. To support this critical need, in this work, we introduce ReUse, a simple but effective deep learning approach to estimate the carbon absorbed by forest areas based on remote sensing. The proposed method’s novelty is in using the public above-ground biomass (AGB) data from the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative Biomass project as ground truth to estimate the carbon sequestration capacity of any portion of land on Earth using Sentinel-2 images and a pixel-wise regressive UNet. The approach has been compared with two literature proposals using a private dataset and human-engineered features. The results show a more remarkable generalization ability of the proposed approach, with a decrease in Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Square Error over the runner-up of 16.9 and 14.3 in the area of Vietnam, 4.7 and 5.1 in the area of Myanmar, 8.0 and 1.4 in the area of Central Europe, respectively. As a case study, we also report an analysis made for the Astroni area, a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) natural reserve struck by a large fire, producing predictions consistent with values found by experts in the field after in situ investigations. These results further support the use of such an approach for the early detection of AGB variations in urban and rural areas.
... Subsequently, it 31 is paramount to conduct an explicit investigation into the methods and procedures for 32 quantifying carbon sinks. Generally, the above-ground dry biomass holds about 50% of 33 carbon; as such, a friction factor of 0.5 is commonly used for converting AGB into carbon 34 concentration [4][5]. more accurate [6], but they are also time-consuming, laborious, challenging to implement in 38 inaccessible areas, and destructive in nature [7]. ...
... In order to make inferences, the Sentinel-2 images downloaded on 31 May 2017 were 254 upscaled to a spatial resolution of 20 meters, assuming that the spatial correlations learned 255 from the network at 100 meters are also reproducible at 20 meters; this improves the 256 resolution of the predictions compared to the resolution of the AGB raster of the ESA CCI 257 Biomass project which is at 100 meters. The predictions of Carbon stocks were made by 258 creating the predicted raster of AGB 5 by five non-overlapping patches, corresponding 259 to one hectare each; then, for each patch, the average AGB value expressed in tonnes 260 per hectare was taken, which, when multiplied by 1 hectare, which is the extent of the 261 patch, yields a value in tonnes; these values were summed over all patches, and the final 262 result multiplied by 0.5 [4][5] to obtain the value of absorbed carbon in tonnes. Figure 2. On the left is the predicted above-ground biomass raster of the Astroni nature reserve before the July 2017 fire; on the right is the predicted above-ground biomass raster after the fire for the same area. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has recently established the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) program that requires countries to report their carbon emissions and sink estimates through national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGI). Thus, developing automatic systems capable of estimating the carbon absorbed by forests without in-situ observation becomes essential. To support this important need, in this work we introduce ReUse, a simple but effective deep-learning approach to estimate the carbon absorbed by forest areas based on remote sensing. The novelty of the proposed method is in the use of the public above-ground biomass (AGB) data from the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative Biomass project as ground truth to estimate the carbon sequestration capacity of any portion of land on Earth using Sentinel-2 images and a pixel-wise Regressive UNet. The approach has been compared to two literature proposals, using a private dataset and human-engineered features. The results show a greater generalization ability of the proposed approach, with a decrease in Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error, respectively, of 16.9 and 14.3 in the area of Vietnam and 4.7 and 5.1 in the area of Myanmar over the runner-up. Finally, as a case study, we reported an analysis made for the Astroni area, a nature reserve located near the metropolitan area of Naples in southern Italy, struck by a large fire, producing predictions consistent with values found by experts in the field. These results further support the use of such an approach for the early detection of AGB variations, both in urban and rural areas.
... Hasil penghitungan cadangan karbon di atas permukaan dilanjutkan dengan penghitungan potensi penyerapan CO2 oleh tanaman dengan menggunakan rumus (Toochi, 2018): ...
Article
Full-text available
Dusung adalah sistem pengelolaan lahan secara tradisional di Maluku dengan menanam berbagai spesies tanaman di area yang sama. Faktor-faktor seperti intensif pengelolaan lahan, pemilihan dan kombinasi spesies tanaman, struktur vegetasi, topografi, tanah, dan lainnya memengaruhi produktivitas dusung secara ekonomi dan ekologi. Produktivitas secara ekologis memengaruhi kandungan biomassa yang menjadi indikator potensi serapan karbon dalam dusung tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pengukuran langsung di lapangan pada beberapa pool karbon khusus untuk biomassa di atas permukaan tanah. Pengambilan data berpedoman pada Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) 7724-2019 tentang Pengukuran lapangan untuk penaksiran cadangan karbon hutan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan keanekaragaman spesies vegetasi Dusung Negeri Rutong pada semua tingkat pertumbuhan berada pada kategori sedang cenderung menjadi rendah didominasi tanaman buah-buahan seperti Durian (Durio zibethinus). Keanekaragaman spesies tingkat pohon yang sedang karena masyarakat mengontrol spesies yang tumbuh di lahan dusung. Total cadangan karbon atas permukaan di dusun Rutong sebesar 106,424 ton/ha yang terdiri atas pohon 100,673 ton/ha, tumbuhan bawah 1,708 ton/ha, serasah 1,124 ton/ha, nekromas 0,042 ton/ha dan bambu (Schizostachyum brachycladum) 2,877 ton/ha sedangkan potensi serapan karbondioksida (CO2) equivalen sebesar 390,221 ton/ha.
... The improvement in CSR can be attributed to the enhanced growth characteristics, which could possibly have increased the photosynthetic rate of plants (Farrelly et al. 2013). Through photosynthesis, plants uptake huge amounts of CO 2, which is the principal greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and capture it within organic forms (Toochi 2018). This way sequestration of carbon occurs by green plants, which helps to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. ...
Article
Ecological restoration of fly ash-degraded soils is a major concern for developing countries like India. So far, various physicochemical techniques have been employed to restore these polluted lands, but the limitations of cost, inefficiency, and secondary pollutant generation have forced ecologists to look for alternative approaches. Phytoremediation has been widely employed to replace these techniques, and to produce an economic asset along with the restoration of fly ash-degraded land, through bamboo species which serve as a parallel factor increasing the overall efficiency of bio methods, becomes very interesting. Four bamboo species, Bambusa balcooa, B. vulgaris 'wamin', B. bambos, and B. vulgaris, were planted at abandoned fly ash dumpsite. After two years of plantation, there was a significant improvement in all the physicochemical characteristics of the fly ash dumpsite. Phytoremediation indices in terms of bioconcentration factor (BCF) (1.26 and 1.72) and translocation factor (TF) (1.98 and 1.25) presented that B. bambos is the ideal species for the phytoextraction of Cr and Zn, while B. balcooa is an ideal species for the phytostabilization of lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and zinc (Zn), B. vulgaris 'wamin' for the phytostabilization of copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), Zn, and As and B. vulgaris for phytostabilization of Cu, chromium (Cr), and Ni, respectively. There was a significant improvement in biomass production in all the bamboo species being highest in B. balcooa (1087 kg ha −1) after two years of establishment on the fly ash dumpsite. Further, B. balcooa was found as the ideal bamboo species for sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) (8217 tonnes C ha −1 year −1). This work further suggests that B. balcooa is an excellent species for eco-restoration with a reliable air pollution tolerance index (APTI) (16.65). Principal component analysis demonstrated that B. bambos is the most potent bamboo species for phytoremediation of fly ash dumpsites owing to its high biomass capacity, positively correlated with hyperaccumulation of heavy metals. However, the fate of heavy metals after litter decomposition needs to be examined in detail to make this study a widespread approach.
... In the grand scheme of the global carbon cycle, vegetation also plays an equally pivotal role [27]. Plants, through the process of photosynthesis, absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into organic compounds, thereby acting as carbon sinks [28]. The death and decomposition of plant materials contribute to the SOC pool [29]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This review article aims to acknowledge the multifaceted functions of soil, and given its status as the largest terrestrial carbon store, to reaffirm its previously established importance in carbon sequestration. The article outlines the key variables that affect soil’s ability to trap carbon and highlights the significance of soil in halting climate change. A bibliometric study of seven sets of keywords relating to the significance of soil in carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation laid the foundation for this review. The literature review that followed, which was based on the bibliometric analysis, concentrated on carbon sequestration and the impact of the key factors that affect the amount of organic carbon in soil, including (1) climatic conditions; (2) topography; (3) parent material; (4) organisms; and (5) soil qualities. The goal of this review article is to recognize the diverse roles of soil, while reasserting its well-documented significance in carbon sequestration. This is particularly important considering soil’s position as the largest terrestrial storehouse of carbon.
Article
Full-text available
While marine kelp forests have provided valuable ecosystem services for millennia, the global ecological and economic value of those services is largely unresolved. Kelp forests are diminishing in many regions worldwide, and efforts to manage these ecosystems are hindered without accurate estimates of the value of the services that kelp forests provide to human societies. Here, we present a global estimate of the ecological and economic potential of three key ecosystem services - fisheries production, nutrient cycling, and carbon removal provided by six major forest forming kelp genera (Ecklonia, Laminaria, Lessonia, Macrocystis, Nereocystis, and Saccharina). Each of these genera creates a potential value of between $64,400 and $147,100/hectare each year. Collectively, they generate between $465 and $562 billion/year worldwide, with an average of $500 billion. These values are primarily driven by fisheries production (mean $29,900, 904 Kg/Ha/year) and nitrogen removal ($73,800, 657 Kg N/Ha/year), though kelp forests are also estimated to sequester 4.91 megatons of carbon from the atmosphere/year highlighting their potential as blue carbon systems for climate change mitigation. These findings highlight the ecological and economic value of kelp forests to society and will facilitate better informed marine management and conservation decisions.
Article
Among the various factors that influencing global climatic conditions, the enhancing concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide plays a central role. The capabilities of trees in sequestering carbon dioxide through photosynthesis is well known and gained more attention today as it offers an eco-friendly and economical strategy when compared with physical and chemical methods of carbon sequestration. In the present study, an attempt has been carried out to assess the CO2 sequestration potentialities of selected trees pertaining to Vimala College (Autonomous) Campus. For the study each tree species in the campus were identified up to species level along with common name and habit. Among the 146 trees, 61 trees species belonging to 28 families were selected for the present study. The diameter and height of each tree species were recorded separately and the sequestration potentialities of trees were worked out and reported. The study highlights the role of educational institutions in maintaining greenery which can act as local carbon sink.
Article
The buildup of carbon dioxide in the global atmosphere represents one of the principal causes of the greenhouse effect that is overtaking the Earth's climatic systems and that threatens salient sectors of economic development in both the developed and developing worlds. A management response appears to offer substantial scope to counter the buildup of carbon dioxide, even though it has been little addressed in systematic fashion. It is a massive tree-planting programme in the humid tropics. Tree plantations absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and the humid tropics with year-round warmth and moisture are by far the best place for fast-growing tree plantations. Reforestation on a suitable scale in the humid tropics - accompanied of course by measures to halt deforestation - could eventually serve to sequester carbon in amounts significant for our efforts to counter the greenhouse effect.
Total-Tree Weight, Stem Weight, and Volume Tables for Hardwood Species in the Southeast. USA: Georgia Forestry Commission
  • A Clark
  • J R Saucier
  • W H Mcnab
Clark A, Saucier JR, McNab WH. Total-Tree Weight, Stem Weight, and Volume Tables for Hardwood Species in the Southeast. USA: Georgia Forestry Commission; 1986. p. 1-52.
USA: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • S De Wald
  • S Josiah
  • B Erdkamp
De Wald S, Josiah S, Erdkamp B. Heating With Wood: Producing, Harvesting and Processing Firewood. USA: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2005.
  • R A Birdsey
Birdsey RA. Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest Ecosystems. USA: General Technical Report (GTR); 1992.
Forests and Global Change: Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions. USA: American Forests
  • N Sampson
  • D Hair
Sampson N, Hair D. Forests and Global Change: Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions. USA: American Forests; 1996.
Management of forest for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions
  • S Brown
  • J Sathaye
  • Mgr Cannell
Brown S, Sathaye J, Cannell MGR. Management of forest for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. In climate change 1995
Adaptation and mitigation of climate change
  • Impacts
Impacts, Adaptation and mitigation of climate change. In: Watson RT, et al. editors. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 773-797.