Conference PaperPDF Available

Abstract

Increasing the level of feed autonomy (self-sufficiency) is usually considered as a prerequisite for conversion of cattle farms to organic farming. Technically it requires adjusting fodder production and feed purchases in terms of quantity and quality to the requirements of the herd. A joint technical and economic assessment of feed autonomy in organic cattle farms was conducted. Data were collected in 2014 and 2015 on 11 Belgian farms located in distinct agricultural regions and characterised by different proportions of grassland area. Dry matter yield and nutritional quality were determined at each harvest for each fodder crop, including permanent and temporary grasslands, immature cereal-legume crops and grain crops. Animal productions and economic data, including all cash inflows and outflows, were recorded. Economically efficient farms had high levels of feed autonomy, ranging from 89 to 100%. Three economically-efficient feeding strategies were identified for organic cattle production. Strategies differed from each other according to the proportion of grassland area, level of animal production and the achieved level of feed autonomy.
742 Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 23 – Sustainable meat and milk production from grasslands
Joint technical and economic assessment of feed autonomy in
organic cattle farms
Faux A., Guillaume M., Decruyenaere V. and Stilmant D.
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, rue de Liroux 9, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Abstract
Increasing the level of feed autonomy (self-suciency) is usually considered as a prerequisite for
conversion of cattle farms to organic farming. Technically it requires adjusting fodder production and
feed purchases in terms of quantity and quality to the requirements of the herd. A joint technical and
economic assessment of feed autonomy in organic cattle farms was conducted. Data were collected in
2014 and 2015 on 11 Belgian farms located in distinct agricultural regions and characterised by dierent
proportions of grassland area. Dry matter yield and nutritional quality were determined at each harvest
for each fodder crop, including permanent and temporary grasslands, immature cereal-legume crops
and grain crops. Animal productions and economic data, including all cash inows and outows, were
recorded. Economically ecient farms had high levels of feed autonomy, ranging from 89 to 100%.
ree economically-ecient feeding strategies were identied for organic cattle production. Strategies
diered from each other according to the proportion of grassland area, level of animal production and
the achieved level of feed autonomy.
Keywords: grassland, dairy farm, beef farm, organic, feed autonomy, economic eciency
Introduction
Increasing the level of feed autonomy (self-suciency) is usually considered as a prerequisite for
conversion of cattle farms to organic farming. e EU policy imposes that animals raised in organic
conditions have permanent access to pastures or rough fodder. High prices of organic feeds encourage
farmers to limit feed purchases as much as possible. Increasing the level of feed autonomy is not easy to
complete. It requires adjusting fodder production and feed purchases in terms of quantity and quality to
the requirements of the herd which depend on the animal performances. e right adjustment is found
when the dierence between incomes and total feed costs is maximised. Options for fodder production
are grazed pastures, temporary grasslands, immature cereal-legume crops, grain cereal crops and protein
crops, each of them with a large diversity of options regarding the species composition. e choice of
fodder crops is constrained by the agro-ecological conditions of the cultivation area.
To date, feed autonomy in Walloon cattle farms has been studied from technical or economic data
independently (Bernes et al., 2011; Lebacq et al., 2014). In this paper, a joint technical and economic
assessment of feed autonomy in organic cattle farms was conducted in order to identify ecient strategies
for organic cattle production.
Materials and methods
Data were collected in 2014 and 2015 on 11 organic farms, six dairy and ve beef farms. Farms were
located in distinct agricultural regions in Wallonia (Belgium) and numbered by type of production, milk
(M) or beef (B), and increasing percentage of permanent grassland area (PPG) in the total cultivated area
(Table 1). Out of the beef farms, farms B2, B4 and B5 were sucklers only (‘breeders’), while B1 and B3
were also fatteners (‘breeders-fatteners’).
Fodder production was characterised in terms of quantity and nutritional quality (Van Es, 1975;
Tamminga et al., 1994). Dry matter (DM) production from grazed pastures was estimated by analysing
Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 23 – Sustainable meat and milk production from grasslands 743
grazing calendars using the model developed by Delagarde et al. (2017). For dairy farms, milk production
was recorded by the farmer and expressed per dairy cow. For beef farms, the annual liveweight production
was calculated over the entire herd and expressed per suckler cow. is was achieved by taking into
account livestock variations and by estimating the weight of each animal as a function of its age using
a growth model parameterized on breed-respective data. All cash in- and outows were recorded. For
the sake of comparability, feed production costs were restricted to crop inputs and fodder storage costs.
Dierent indicators were computed to assess the farm performances. ose included the level of feed
autonomy (FA) and the weighted average crude protein (CP) content of self-produced and purchased
DM. e technical feed eciency (TE) was computed as the ratio between total amount of produced
milk or liveweight and total amount of consumed DM. e economic feed eciency (EE) was computed
as one minus the ratio between total feed cost (feed production costs and feed purchases) and gross
product without subsidies. Finally, the cost price of consumed self-produced dry matter (CostP-self)
and the cost price of the total consumed feeds (CostP-tot) were computed. Data were analysed using
the R soware.
Results and discussion
e PPG increased from 33 to 100% in dairy farms and from 62 to 86% in beef farms (Table 1). Dairy
farms M5 and M6, located in Ardenne, had permanent grasslands only. Grain cereal crops were found
in all farms with the exception of M5 and M6 and two beef farms, B2 and B5. Average dry matter
yields, computed over grazed pastures and fodder and grain crops, were highest in farms located in the
Loam region (M1 and B1) and lowest in farms located in Famenne (M3 and B2). In terms of animal
productions, farms M1 and B1 were the most intensive ones, and, on the opposite, farms M2 and B2,
B4, and B5, the least intensive ones.
FA ranged between 78 and 100%, with highest levels found in farms M1, M2, B1, B3 and B4 (≥ 98%)
and lowest levels in farms M3 and B2, located in Famenne. e average CP content of self-produced
feed increased from 11.5 to 17%. It was highest in M5 and M6, the two farms that included permanent
grasslands only. e average CP content of purchased feeds was highest in farms M1 and B1, which
were also characterised by the highest TE. Farms with high TE also had high EE but no relationship was
observed between TE and EE.
A focus was put on farms with EE higher than 80% (thus farms M3 and B2 were discarded). Economically
ecient farms had high FA, ranging from 89 to 100%. FA was lower in farms with only grasslands (P
< 0.001). ese farms were also characterised by lower CostP-self (P < 0.05). e relationship between
CostP-tot and PPG was not signicant, suggesting that low CostP-self were at least partly compensated
by larger feed purchases.
Based on this survey we identied three economically-ecient feeding strategies for organic cattle
production. Strategy 1 is characterised by a grass-based production with FA of 89-94%. It includes
dairy farms with an intermediate milk production level and breeder beef farms (farms M5, M6 and B5).
Strategy 2 is characterised by a multiple crops-based production with FA of 94-99%. It includes dairy
farms with a high milk production level and breeder-fattener beef farms (farms M1, M4, B1 and B3).
Strategy 3 is characterised by both grassland and crop productions, with FA close to 100%. It includes
dairy farms with a relatively low milk production level and breeder beef farms (farms M2 and B4).
744 Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 23 – Sustainable meat and milk production from grasslands
Conclusion
is study focused on the joint analysis of technical and economic data from organic dairy and beef
farms. Based on 11 farms analysed over two years, it enabled three distinct economically-ecient feeding
strategies to be identied for organic cattle production.
References
Bernes, A., Cremer, S., Amerlynck, D., Decruyenaere, V., Clément, C., Jamar, D., Hennart, S. and Stilmant, D. (2011) Analyse de la
valorisation des ressources auto-produites que représentent les fourrages et engrais de ferme au sein d’exploitation d’élevage d’un
parc naturel en Belgique. 3R, 18: 305-308.
Delagarde, R., Caillat, H. and Fortin, J. (2017) HerbValo, une méthode pour estimer dans chaque parcelle la quantité d’herbe
valorisée par les ruminants au pâturage. Journées de Printemps de l’AFPF, Paris.
Lebacq, T., Baret, P. and Stilmant, D. (2014) Role of input self-suciency in the economic and environmental sustainability of
specialised dairy farms. Animal:1-9.
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W.M., Subnel, A.P.J., Meijer, R.G.M., Steg , A., Wever, C.J.G. and Block, M.C. (1994) e Dutch protein
evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139-155.
Van Es, A.J.H. (1975) Feed evaluation of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 2, 95-107.
Table 1. Fodder productions, animal productions and technical and economic performance of 11 organic cattle farms in Belgium, over two
years, 2014 and 2015.
Milk farms1Beef farms1
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
Agricultural region Loam
region
Sandyloam
region
Famenne Ardenne Ardenne Ardenne Loam
region
Famenne Ardenne Ardenne Condroz
Fodder production
Permanent grasslands (%) 33 48 63 78 100 100 62 68 72 81 86
Temporary grasslands (%) 37 15 14 6 0 0 10 3 19 6 14
Immature cereal-legume crops(%) 0 9 9 0 0 0 18 29 0 0 0
Grain cereal crops(%)230 27 14 9 0 0 5 0 9 13 0
Protein crops(%) 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Average dry matter yield (kg DM ha-1) 7,381 5,509 4,220 4,980 6,329 5,607 7,208 3,702 4,530 5,200 5,926
Animal productions
Milk production (kg milk dairy cow-1 year-1) 7,292 3,629 5,267 6,596 5,263 5,466 - - - - -
Beef production (kg liveweight suckler cow-1
year-1)
- - - - - - 618 239 332 227 227
Animal production sale price (€ kg milk or
liveweight-1)
0.45 0.36 0.56 0.43 0.49 0.48 3.33 1.38 1.71 1.69 1.91
Technical and economic performances
Stocking rate (LU ha-1) 31.34 1.43 1.09 1.14 0.98 1.18 1.90 1.02 0.93 1.24 1.68
Level of feed autonomy (%) 99 100 78 94 93 89 98 85 98 99 94
Crude protein content of self-produced DM (%) 14.6 14.2 13.8 15.6 17.0 16.8 15.4 13.4 13.8 11.5 13.0
Crude protein content of purchased DM (%) 48.8 0 13.6 11.2 12.2 15.1 25.5 14.5 15.9 4.7 11.4
Feed technical eciency (kg of milk or
liveweight/100 kg of consumed DM)
73.5 64.3 64.9 85.4 67.3 70.6 8.4 6.0 5.6 4.7 3.9
Feed economic eciency (%) 89.3 80.7 61.8 83.8 92.4 89.3 87.3 47.3 89.1 91.2 89.1
Cost price of self-produced feed (€ tDM-1) 27.0 36.6 69.2 21.7 8.0 17.0 17.2 26.4 9.1 4.4 13.0
Cost price of total consumed feed (€ tDM-1) 36.8 46.6 139.5 53.9 26.8 40.0 33.9 40.4 18.5 5.8 15.6
1 Farms are numbered according to their % of permanent grasslands. Out of the beef farms, farms B2, B4 and B5 are sucklers only (‘breeders’), while B1 and B3 are also fatteners
(‘breeders-fatteners’); 2 Grain cereal crops include both pure cereal crops and cereal-legume mixtures cultivated for grain.; 3 LU - livestock unit.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Increasing input self-sufficiency is often viewed as a target to improve sustainability of dairy farms. However, few studies have specifically analysed input self-sufficiency, by including several technical inputs and without only focussing on animal feeding, in order to explore its impact on farm sustainability. To address this gap, our work has three objectives as follows: (1) identifying the structural characteristics required by specialised dairy farms located in the grassland area to be self-sufficient; (2) analysing the relationships between input self-sufficiency, environmental and economic sustainability; and (3) studying how the farms react to a decrease in milk price according to their self-sufficiency degree. Based on farm accounting databases, we categorised 335 Walloon specialised conventional dairy farms into four classes according to their level of input self-sufficiency. To this end, we used as proxy the indicator of economic autonomy - that is, the ratio between costs of inputs related to animal production, crop production and energy use and the total gross product. Classes were then compared using multiple comparison tests and canonical discriminant analysis. A total of 30 organic farms - among which 63% had a high level of economic autonomy - were considered separately and compared with the most autonomous class. We showed that a high degree of economic autonomy is associated, in conventional farms, with a high proportion of permanent grassland in the agricultural area. The most autonomous farms used less input - especially animal feeding - for a same output level, and therefore combined good environmental and economic performances. Our results also underlined that, in a situation of decrease in milk price, the least autonomous farms had more latitude to decrease their input-related costs without decreasing milk production. Their incomes per work unit were, therefore, less impacted by falling prices, but remained lower than those of more autonomous farms. In such a situation, organic farms kept stable incomes, because of a slighter decrease in organic milk price. Our results pave the way to study the role of increasing input self-sufficiency in the transition of dairy farming systems towards sustainability. Further research is required to study a wide range of systems and agro-ecological contexts, as well as to consider the evolution of farm sustainability in the long term.
Article
Full-text available
In 1991 a new protein evaluation system replaced the Digestible Crude Protein (DCP) system in the Netherlands: the DVE/OEB-system. The system was mainly developed with the aim to prevent avoidable losses of nitrogen, by feeding according to more exactly defined requirements of dairy cows. A second aim was to predict milk protein production more accurately. Protein requirements for maintenance, milk protein production, growth, mobilisation, metabolic losses in the digestive tract and gestation are expressed in DVE, the sum of digestible feed and microbial true protein available in the small intestine. In the system each feed has a DVE-value composed of the digestible true protein contributed by feed protein escaping rumen degradation (1), microbial protein synthesized in the rumen (2) and a correction for endogenous protein losses in the digestive tract (3). Each feed also has a degraded protein balance (OEB) reflecting the difference between the potential microbial protein synthesis based on degraded feed crude protein and that based on energy available for microbial fermentation in the rumen. The framework of the new system is based on what are considered strong elements of other recently developed protein evaluation systems. Additionally new elements are introduced, including undegraded starch (USTA), fermentation products (FP) in ensiled feeds, the role of energy balance in protein supply and the way in which requirements change in the course of lactation. Data within the framework of the system are mainly of Dutch origin. This is particularly true for the regression equations developed to predict the protein values of forages and protein values of a number of by-product ingredients.
Article
Intervention présentée aux Journées de l'AFPF, "Le pâturage au coeur des systèmes d'élevage de demain", les 21 et 22 mars 2017
Article
A general description of energy lossesf from food through faeces, methane, fermentation heat, urine and heat production in lactating cows in given. It is said that the conventional feed evaluation systems for dairy cows, although evaluating ration size correctly, underestimate some components of the rations and overestimate others. This interferes with a correct evaluation of the separate feedstuffs, so important for optimal pasture and concentrate use. The separate parts of feed utilisation are treated more closely: digestibility, metabolizable energy (ME) content of the digested energy and the utilisation of this ME. It is argued that in lactating cows the ration's ME content can be derived from composition and sheep digestibility data and that the influence on it of feeding level for most rations is moderate and predictable. A survey of most balance trials with lactating cows performed so far in the world - more than 1 000 - shows that 60% of the ME present above the quantity needed for maintenance (117 kcal ME per unit of metabolic weight) was converted into milk and body tissue energy. The efficiency of the ME utilisation, both for maintenance and milk production, was slightly higher at higher contents of ME in the ration's gross energy. It is concluded that the available information of balance trials with dairy cows by far exceeds the information of similar trials with fattening steers on which the starch equivalent system of feed evaluation for dairy cows is based. The information available today shows that the starch equivalent system evaluates the separate feedstuffs for lactating cows incorrectly and that a system derived from balance trials with lactating cows is to be preferred. A survey of such a system suited for use in practice is presented.
Analyse de la valorisation des ressources auto-produites que représentent les fourrages et engrais de ferme au sein d'exploitation d'élevage d'un parc naturel en Belgique
  • A Bernes
  • S Cremer
  • D Amerlynck
  • V Decruyenaere
  • C Clément
  • D Jamar
  • S Hennart
  • D Stilmant
Bernes, A., Cremer, S., Amerlynck, D., Decruyenaere, V., Clément, C., Jamar, D., Hennart, S. and Stilmant, D. (2011) Analyse de la valorisation des ressources auto-produites que représentent les fourrages et engrais de ferme au sein d'exploitation d'élevage d'un parc naturel en Belgique. 3R, 18: 305-308.