ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract and Figures

The plant Cannabis sativa L. has been used as an herbal remedy for centuries and is the most important source of phytocannabinoids. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) consists of receptors, endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) and metabolizing enzymes, and plays an important role in different physiological and pathological processes. Phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids can interact with the components of ECS or other cellular pathways and thus affect the development/progression of diseases, including cancer. In cancer patients, cannabinoids have primarily been used as a part of palliative care to alleviate pain, relieve nausea and stimulate appetite. In addition, numerous cell culture and animal studies showed antitumor effects of cannabinoids in various cancer types. Here we reviewed the literature on anticancer effects of plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids, to better understand their mechanisms of action and role in cancer treatment. We also reviewed the current legislative updates on the use of cannabinoids for medical and therapeutic purposes, primarily in the EU countries. In vitro and in vivo cancer models show that cannabinoids can effectively modulate tumor growth, however, the antitumor effects appear to be largely dependent on cancer type and drug dose/concentration. Understanding how cannabinoids are able to regulate essential cellular processes involved in tumorigenesis, such as progression through the cell cycle, cell proliferation and cell death, as well as the interactions between cannabinoids and the immune system, are crucial for improving existing and developing new therapeutic approaches for cancer patients. The national legislation of the EU Member States defines the legal boundaries of permissible use of cannabinoids for medical and therapeutic purposes, however, these legislative guidelines may not be aligned with the current scientific knowledge.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
BOSNIAN JOURNAL of
Basic Medical Sciences WWW.BJBMS.ORG
INTRODUCTION
e first discovered and most important source of can-
nabinoids was the plant Cannabis sativa L., which has been
used as an herbal remedy for centuries. e earliest archae-
ological evidence of cannabis medical use dates back to the
Han Dynasty in ancient China, where it was recommended
for rheumatic pain, constipation, disorders of the female
reproductive tract, and malaria among other conditions. In
traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine, cannabis was used to
treat neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urogenital, and
various infectious diseases []. e plant was also cultivated
in other countries in Asia as well as in Europe, especially for
making ropes, clothes/fibres, food and paper []. In Western
medicine, the use of cannabis was notably introduced by
the work of William B. O’Shaughnessy (an Irish physician)
and Jacques-Joseph Moreau (a French psychiatrist) in the
mid-thcentury, who described positive effects of cannabis
preparations, including hashish (the compressed stalked resin
glands), on pain, vomiting, convulsions, rheumatism, tetanus
and mental abilities. Cannabis was recognized as a me dicine in
the United States (US) Pharmacopoeia from , in the form
of tinctures, extracts and resins. However, in the beginning of
the thcentury, cannabis use decreased in Western medicine
due to several reasons: increased use as a recreational drug,
abuse potential, variability in the quality of herbal material,
individual (active) compounds were not identified and alter-
native medications, with known efficacy, were introduced to
treat the same symptoms [,]. In , as the result of many
legal restrictions, cannabis was removed from the American
Pharmacopoeia and considered to be in the same group as
Cannabinoids in cancer treatment: erapeutic potential
and legislation
Barbara Dariš1*, Mojca Tancer Verboten2, Željko Knez1,3, Polonca Ferk4
Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia, Department
of Labour Law, Faculty of Law, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia, Laboratory for Separation Processes and Product Design, Faculty
of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia, Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics,
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
ABSTRACT
e plant Cannabis sativa L. has be en used as an herbal remedy for centuries and is the most important source of phytocannabinoids. e endo-
cannabinoid system (ECS) consists of receptors, endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids) and metabolizing enzymes, and plays an important
role in different physiological and pathological processes. Phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids can interact with the components
of ECS or other cellular pathways and thus affect the development/progression of diseases, including cancer. In cancer patients, cannabinoids
have primarily been used as a part of palliative care to alleviate pain, relieve nausea and stimulate appetite. In addition, numerous cell culture
and animal studies showed antitumor effects of cannabinoids in various cancer types. Here we reviewed the literature on anticancer effects of
plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids, to better understand their mechanisms of action and role in cancer treatment. We also reviewed the
current legislative updates on the use of cannabinoids for medical and therapeutic purposes, primarily in the EU countries. In vitro and in vivo
cancer models show that cannabinoids can effectively modulate tumor growth, however, the antitumor effects appear to be largely dependent
on cancer type and drug dose/concentration. Understanding how cannabinoids are able to regulate essential cellular processes involved in
tumorigenesis, such as progression through the cell cycle, cell proliferation and cell death, as well as the interactions between cannabinoids and
the immune system, are crucial for improving existing and developing new therapeutic approaches for cancer patients. e national legislation
of the EU Member States defines the legal boundaries of permissible use of cannabinoids for medical and therapeutic purposes, however, these
legislative guidelines may not be aligned with the current scientific knowledge.
KEY WORDS: Cannabinoids; antitumor effects; signaling pathways; legislation
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/./bjbms.. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. xxxx;xx(x):1-10. © 2018 ABMSFBIH
*Corresponding author: Barbara Dariš, Department of Cell Biology,
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Maribor, Taborska , SI- Maribor, Slovenia.
E-mail: barbara.daris@um.si.
Submitted:  April /Accepted:  May 
REVIEW ARTICLE
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
2
other illicit drugs []. Consequently, the exploration of med-
ical uses of cannabis has been significantly slowed down
for more than a half of century. In , a step forward was
made with the inclusion of a monograph of Cannabis spp. in
the American Herbal Pharmacopoeia []. Moreover, the cur-
rent legislative changes in the European Union (EU), US and
Canada that allow cannabis for medical and/or recreational
use, the progress in scientific research and public awareness
on the benefits of medical cannabis all contributed to the ris-
ing interest in the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids [,].
In recent years, cannabinoids have been extensively stud-
ied for their potential anticancer effects and symptom man-
agement in cancer patients [-]. One of the first studies
describing antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids was pub-
lished in  []. Potential antitumor activity of plant-derived
or phytocannabinoids, e.g., (−)-trans-∆-tetrahydrocannabi-
nol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), ∆-THC, cannabidiol (CBD)
and cannabicyclol (CBL), as well as of synthetic cannabinoids,
such as WIN-,-, is the focus of current research [,,].
In the s, the main components of the endocannabinoid
system (ECS) were identified as follows: (i) two types of cannabi-
noid (CB) receptors, CB and CB receptor; (ii) two main endog-
enous ligands (endocannabinoids) in mammals, anandamide or
N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA) and -arachidonoylglyc-
erol (-AG); and (iii) endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes,
fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase
(MAG lipase). FAAH is the primary catabolic enzyme for fatty
acid amides (FAAs), a class of bioactive lipids including AEA,
while MAG lipase is a key enzyme in the hydrolysis of -AG
[-]. Subsequent studies demonstrated the important role of
the ECS and endocannabinoids in different physiological and
pathological processes, such the regulation of excitatory and
inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system
(CNS), food intake, nociceptive signaling, analgesia, immuno-
modulation, inflammation, and cancer cell signaling [-].
In cancer patients, cannabinoids have primarily been used
as a part of palliative care to alleviate pain, relieve nausea and
stimulate appetite [,]. In addition, numerous cell culture
and animal studies showed antitumor effects of cannabi-
noids and suggested new therapeutic opportunities for can-
cer patients []. However, recent research also emphasizes
the importance of safety measures when using cannabinoids,
since these compounds can potentially impair cognitive func-
tions, especially in adolescents [].
e aim of this article is to review the relevant literature
on anticancer effects of plant-derived and synthetic cannabi-
noids, to increase our understanding of their potential mecha-
nisms of action and possible role in cancer treatment. We also
reviewed the current legislative updates on the use of canna-
binoids for medical and therapeutic purposes, primarily in the
EU countries.
MOLECULAR BASIS FOR
CANNABINOID TREATMENT OF
CANCER
e role of the endocannabinoid system in cancer
Endocannabinoids interact with different types of recep-
tors, including the two Gi/o-coupled CB receptors, CB and
CB []. While CB receptors are mainly located in the
CNS and, to a lesser degree, in some peripheral tissues, CB
receptors are primarily expressed on the surface of immune
cells[]. Due to the low expression of CB receptors in the
CNS they represent a promising pharmacological target, as
selective CB ligands potentially would not have psychotropic
effects []. In addition, other CB receptor types and isoforms
or completely different pharmacological targets of cannabi-
noids have been described, for example transient receptor
potential vanilloid receptor  (TRPV), orphan G-protein
coupled receptor (GPR), peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptors (PPARs) [,], transient receptor potential melas-
tatin  (TRPM), TRP vanilloid  (TRPV) and TRP ankyrin
 (TRPA) channel []. It is important to note that cannabi-
noids may also exert their antitumor effects independent of
the CB receptors, for example as demonstrated in human pan-
creatic cancer cell line MIA PaCa- [].
e biological role of the ECS in cancer pathophysiology
is not completely clear [] but most studies suggest that CB
receptors and their endogenous ligands are upregulated in
tumor tissue [,,,-,,] and that the overexpres-
sion of ECS components (i.e.,receptors, ligands, and enzymes)
correlates with tumor aggressiveness [-]. However, a
tumor-suppressive role of ECS was also indicated by some
studies, e.g.,the upregulation of endocannabinoid-degrading
enzymes was observed in aggressive human cancers and can-
cer cell lines []. Moreover, experimental studies showed that
the activation of CB receptors by cannabinoids is antitumor-
igenic in most cases, i.e., it inhibits tumor cell proliferation,
induces apoptosis in vitro, and blocks angiogenesis and tumor
invasion/metastasis in vivo [,,,]. e effects of CB
receptor (over)expression in selected human tumor cell lines
are described in more detail in Table.
Antitumor effects of cannabinoids
By targeting the ECS, cannabinoids affect many essential
cellular processes and signaling pathways which are crucial for
tumor development [,,]. For example, they can induce
cell cycle arrest, promote apoptosis, and inhibit proliferation,
migration and angiogenesis in tumor cells (Figure ) [,].
In addition to CB receptor-mediated (CB and CB recep-
tors) cannabinoid effects, it appears that these processes
can also be CB receptor-independent (e.g.,through TRPV,
3
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
-hydroxytryptamine [-HT], or nicotinic acetylcholine
receptor [nAChR] among others) [], suggesting that molec-
ular mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of can-
nabinoids are even more complex than originally thought.
Moreover, it is expected that future studies will discover novel
molecular targets of cannabinoids [].
e ability of plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids
to control cancer cell growth, invasion, and death has been
demonstrated in numerous experimental studies using cancer
cell lines and genetically engineered mouse models. Also, differ-
ent types of cannabinoids may have different modes of action.
For example, a phytocannabinoid THC promotes apoptosis in
a CB-receptor dependent manner, while CBD exerts this effect
independently of CB/CB receptors and possibly includes the
activation of TRPV receptor, at least in some cancer types.
Also, some CB receptor agonists are less efficient in promoting
cancer cell death although they demonstrate higher affinity for
CB receptors than THC, such as synthetic CB receptor agonist
WIN-,-. Better understanding of homo-or hetero-oligo-
merization of CB receptors, their interactions with lipid rafts
for example, and mechanisms of selective G-protein coupling
may clarify these differences []. Finally, because molecular
changes are tumor-specific in most cases (i.e.,the presence of
intra-and inter-tumor heterogeneity), CB-receptor mediated
antitumor effects largely depend on the type of cancer that is
being investigated and characteristics of derived tumor cell
line, including the donor characteristics, tumor site of origin
and hormonal responsiveness [-].
PLANT-DERIVED CANNABINOIDS
AND THEIR ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY
Phytocannabinoids are a group of C terpenopheno-
lic compounds predominately produced by the plants from
the genus Cannabis. Different resources indicate that there
are more than  different cannabinoids together with their
breakdown products, although some report that >  com-
pounds is a more accurate estimation. Among these, the most
abundant are THC, CBD, CBN and cannabichromene (CBC)
followed by ∆-THC, cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabidi-
varin (CBDV) and cannabigerol (CBG). e highest content
of cannabinoids is located in the flowering tops of the plant
and small, young leaves around the flowers [].
Pharmacologically, THC is a partial agonist at CB and CB
receptor with inhibitory constant (Ki) of . nM for CB and
. nM for CB []. ∆-THC is a stable isomer of THC with
similar Ki []. e most studied non-psychotropic phytocan-
nabinoid is CBD which does not have psychotomimetic activ-
ity. CBD has a low affinity for CBand CB; it was suggested
that it acts as an antagonist of CB/CB agonists but also as
TABLE1. Expression of cannabinoid (CB) receptors in selected human cancer types
Cancer cell type Regulation of CB1/CB2Mechanisms and other relevant circumstances Reference
Breast cancer
Elevated CB2 receptor expression in
HER2+breast tumors.
HER2 induces CB2 expression activating ELK1(ERK/MAPK cascade);
activated pro-oncogenic signaling through tyrosine kinase c-Src. [28,29]
Presence of TRPV1 in human breast
adenocarcinoma cell line(MCF-7).
TRPV1 agonists/antagonists induce significant inhibition of MCF-7
cell growth. [30]
Prostate cancer
Elevated CB1 receptor expression. Activation of Akt signaling pathway was proposed. Increased CB1 and
FAAH levels correlate with severity of the disease.
[31-34]
[35,36]
Expression of CB1 and CB2 receptor
significantly higher in human prostate
cancer.
Additionally: Presence of TRPV1 and TRPA1 in all prostate cancer
cells(except LNCaP cells), TRPV2 in DU-145 and PC-3 cells only,
TRPM8 in AR-dependent prostate cell lines(e.g., LNCaP).
[37-39]
Expression of CB1 and CB2 receptor
significantly higher in human prostate
cancer.
Expression of GPR55 in
PC-3 and DU-145 cell lines has been reported, mediating effects of LPI. [40]
Chemically induced
hepatocellular
carcinoma
Upregulation of CB1 receptors. Diethylnitrosamine induced liver cancer. [41]
Hepatocellular
carcinoma Overexpression of CB1 and CB2 receptors. Overexpression of CB1 and CB2 receptors is associated with improved
prognosis.
[42]
Non-small cell lung
cancer Overexpression of CB1 and CB2 receptors. Activation of Akt signaling pathway, MMP9 expression and activity. [43]
Chronic lymphocytic
leukemia Overexpression of CB1 and CB2 receptors. CB1 receptor expression correlated with high-risk markers. [44]
Pancreatic cancer
CB1 and CB2 receptors expressed in
normal and pancreatic cancer cells(higher
expression of CB1).
Cannabinoids induced apoptosis via CB2 receptor(ceramide
dependent pathway). [45-47]
Melanoma CB2 is overexpressed in human melanoma
tissues and cell lines. Not reported. [48]
HER2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ELK1: ETS domain-containing protein; c-Src: Tyrosine-protein kinase Src;
ERK: Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase; TRPV1: Transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1; Akt: Protein
Kinase B; FAAH: Fatty acid amide hydrolase; TRPA1: Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1; GPR55: Orphan G-protein coupled receptor 55; AR: Androgen
receptor; LPI: Lysophosphatidylinositol; MMP9: Matrix metallopeptidase 9
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
4
a CB inverse agonist (an inverse agonist binds to the same
receptor-binding site as an agonist and it does not only antag-
onize the effects of the agonist but exerts the opposite effect).
Other mechanisms of action of CBD, that are independent
of CB receptors, include FAAH inhibition, inhibition of AEA
reuptake, it acts as an agonist at PPARγ, TRPV, TRPA and
an antagonist at GPR and TRPM (Table). CBN is a weak
partial agonist at CB (Ki of  nM) and CB(Ki of . nM);
CBG is a potent TRPM antagonist, TRPV and TRPA ago-
nist, and CB partial agonist; while CBC is a potent TRPA ago-
nist and weak inhibitor of AEA reuptake [].
Plant-derived cannabinoids are approved only for some
indications, but additionally have been used off-label. For
example, a standardized alcoholic cannabis extract nabixi-
mols, which has the THC:CBD ratio of : and is available as
an oromucosal spray, was approved in Germany for the treat-
ment of moderate to severe refractory spasticity in multiple
sclerosis. Examples of off-label use of this medication are of
chronic pain in several medical conditions and symptomatic
treatment of selected neuropsychological disorders (e.g.,anx-
iety and sleeping disturbances). Common side effects of can-
nabinoids are tiredness and dizziness (in more than  of
patients), dry mouth, and psychoactive effects among others.
Nevertheless, tolerance to these side effects develops within
a short time in almost all cases. Withdrawal symptoms are
rarely observed in the therapeutic setting [].
An exciting area of research is the technological improve-
ment of existing pharmaceutical formulations, especially
the development of new cannabis-based extracts. Romano
etal.[] found that a CO extracted cannabis extract, with a
high content (.) in -tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV),
inhibits nitrite production induced by lipopolysaccharides
(LPS) in murine peritoneal macrophages, and thus may have a
potential to modulate the inflammatory response in different
FIGURE 1. Example of different signaling pathways induced by cannabinoids in cancer cells [46,51,53-55]. By targeting the endocanna-
binoid system (ECS), cannabinoids affect many essential cellular processes and signaling pathways which are crucial for tumor develop-
ment. For example, they can induce cell cycle arrest, promote apoptosis, and inhibit proliferation, migration and angiogenesis in tumor
cells. AEA: Anandamide; 2-AG: 2-Arachidonoylglycerol; Akt: Protein Kinase B; AMPK: 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein
kinase; Bad: Bcl-2-associated death promoter; Bax: Apoptosis regulator; CaMKK: Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase;
Cdk 2: Cyclin-dependent kinase 2; CHOP: C/EBP homologous protein; CycD: Cyclin D; Cyc E: Cyclin E; ELK1: ETS domain-containing pro-
tein; ERK: Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; FAAH: Fatty acid amide hydrolase; GPR55: Orphan G-protein coupled receptor 55; MAG
lipase: Monoacylglycerol lipase; MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase; p8: Candidate of metastasis 1; p21: Cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitor 1; p27: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKA: Protein kinase A; ROS: Reactive oxygen spe-
cies; TRPV1: Transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1; TRPV2: Transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 2; TRPM8: Transient
receptor potential melastatin 8; mTORC1: Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; mTORC2: Mammalian target of rapamycin com-
plex 2; TRIB3: Tribbles homolog 3.
Arachidonic acid + ethanolamine
Arachidonic acid + glycerol
Plant-derived / synthetic cannabinoids
AEA
2-AG
FAAH
ROS
MAG lipase
Gio
C
Ceramide
CB1 / CB2
receptor N
GPR55TRPV1, TRPV2
TRPM8
C
N
PKA
MAPK activation
(P38/MAPK, JNK and ERK1/2)
Adenylate
cyclase
Proapoptotic proteins
(BAD, Bax)
( cAMP)
Antiapoptotic proteins
(Bcl-2)
Inhibition
Activation
Antitumor effect
APOPTOSIS
AUTOPHAGY
INHIBITED CELL PROLIFERATION
CELL CYCLE
ARREST
Cyc D
Cyc E
cdk2
cdc2
AMPK
ERK1/2
CaMKK
ER stress
mTORC2
mTORC1
TRIB3
P13K
Akt
p27
p21
p8
CHOP
β
5
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
disease conditions []. Another study compared in vitro anti-
oxidant activity and gene expression of antioxidant enzymes
between ethanol and supercritical fluid (SF) extracts of dehu-
lled hemp seed. SF extract exhibited higher radical scavenging
activities compared to ethanol extract. Both extracts upreg-
ulated the expression of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide
dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase
(CAT) in human hepatoma (HepG) cells challenged with
HO, and this effect was greater for SF extracts at the concen-
tration of  g/mL [].
Different plant-derived cannabinoids and cannabis-based
pharmaceutical drugs have been the subject of intensive research
for their potential antitumor activity, especially in cancer cells
that overexpress CBand/or CB receptors compared to normal
tissues []. Many studies were conducted in different cell lines
with cannabis extracts or individual isolated compounds and the
results are sometimes confounding, because efficient anticancer
effects, such as decreased proliferation of cancer cells, activation
of apoptosis, inhibition of cell migration and decreased tumor
vascularization are mainly recorded in breast, prostate and gli-
oma cancer cell lines. In contrast, protumorigenic activity of
natural cannabinoids, i.e.,increased cell proliferation, has been
reported in lung, breast, and hepatoma cell lines []. It appears
that the balance between protumorigenic and antitumor effects
of cannabinoids critically depends on their concentration,
among other factors. For example, Hart et al. [] showed that the
treatment of glioblastoma U-MG and lung carcinoma NCI-
H cell line with nanomolar concentrations of THC (instead
of commonly used micromoral concentrations) led to increased
cell proliferation. e authors also emphasized that nanomolar
concentrations of THC are more likely to be detected in the
serum of patients after drug treatment []. erefore, in cancer
therapy, it is very important to consider the risk of acceleration of
tumor growth due to the concentration-dependent proliferative
potential of cannabinoids [].
In addition to THC, CBD is another plant-derived can-
nabinoid that has been extensively studied for its potential
antitumor effects [,-]. In a panel of human prostate
cancer cell lines, Sharma et al. [] showed that CBD is a
potent inhibitor of cancer cell growth, while this potency
was significantly lower in non-cancer cells. Moreover, CBD
downregulated CB, CB, vascular endothelial growth fac-
tor (VEGF) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate
cancer cells, as well as pro-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-
and IL- in LPS-stimulated dermal fibroblasts, suggesting its
anti-inflammatory properties []. Other studies showed that
CBD preferentially inhibited the survival of breast cancer cells
by inducing apoptosis and autophagy [] and inhibited prolif-
eration and cell invasion in human glioma cell lines [].
e expression of CB and CB receptors on immune cells
suggests their important role in the regulation of the immune
system. Recently, it was demonstrated that the administration
TABLE2. Antitumor activity of selected plant-derived cannabinoids in different cancer cell lines
Cancer cell line Compound Effect Major mechanism Reference
Human breast cell lines
MCF-7 THC Decreased proliferation. Not reported. [63]
MDA-MB-231 CBD Reduced cell viability. Induced
apoptosis and autophagy.
Induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, inhibits
Akt and mTOR signaling. [65]
Human glioma cell lines
U373-MG,
NCI-H292 THC Increased proliferation. rough TACE/ADAM17. [64]
U87-MG,
T98G CBD Inhibits proliferation and invasion. Downregulation of ERK and Akt signaling
pathway, inhibits HIF-1α. [66]
SF-126,
U251
THC+CBD(enhances THC
inhibitory effect)
Synergic inhibition of cell
proliferation.
Modulation of cell cycle, induction of ROS,
apoptosis, modulation of ERK, caspase activities.
[68]
Human prostate cancer cell lines
LNCaP Cannabis extract(CBD enriched) Decreased cell viability. Decreased AR mRNA expression, decreased
mRNA expression of CB1 and CB2 receptor,
PSA reduction, apoptosis.
[39]
PC-3 Cannabis extract(CBD enriched) Decreased cell viability. Not reported. [39]
DU-145
CBD, CBC, CBG,
THC(according to decreased
potency)
Decreased cell viability. Induced apoptosis(intrinsic apoptotic
pathways).
[39]
LNCaP THC, CBD, CBC , CBG(according
to decreased potency) Decreased cell viability. Induced apoptosis, activation of TRPM8. [39]
Human pancreatic cancer cell lines
Capan-2,
PANC-1,
MIA PaCa-2,
BxPC-3
THC Decreased cell viability Induction of p8-ATF-4-TRIB3 pro-apoptotic
pathway.
[47]
THC: (−)-trans-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; CBD: Cannabidiol; CBC: Cannabichromene; CBG: Cannabigerol; Akt: Protein Kinase B; mTOR: Mammalian target
of rapamycin; TACE/ADAM17: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme; ERK: Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; HIF-1α: Hypoxia-inducible fac-
tor 1 alpha; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; AR: Androgen receptor; CB: Cannabinoid; PSA: Prostate-specific antigen; TRPM8: Transient receptor potential
melastatin 8; p8: Candidate of metastasis 1; ATF-4: Activating transcription factor 4; TRIB3: Tribbles homolog 3
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
6
of THC into mice induced apoptosis in T cells and dendritic
cells, leading to immunosuppression. Several studies sug-
gested that cannabinoids are able to suppress inflammatory
responses by downregulating cytokine and chemokine pro-
duction and upregulating T-regulatory cells. Similar results
were obtained with endocannabinoids, i.e.,the administration
of these compounds or the use of inhibitors of enzymes that
break down endocannabinoids had an immunosuppressive
effect and resulted in the recovery from immune-mediated
injury to organs, e.g., in the liver []. As indicated in pre-
vious paragraphs, cannabinoids were able to stimulate cell
proliferation in in vitro and/or in vivo models of several types
of cancer. For example, a treatment with THC in the mouse
mammary carcinoma T expressing low levels of CB and
CB led to enhanced growth of tumor and metastasis, due
to the inhibition of the antitumor immune response, primar-
ily via CB. Moreover, THC led to an increased production
of IL- and IL- in these mice, indicating that it suppresses
the  response by enhancing -associated cytokines as
confirmed by their microarray data (-related genes were
upregulated and -related genes downregulated). Lastly,
the injection of anti-IL- and anti-IL- monoclonal anti-
bodies partially reversed the THC-induced suppression of
the immune response []. In another study, THC promoted
tumorigenicity in two weakly immunogenic murine lung can-
cer models by inhibiting their antitumor immunity; namely,
the inhibitory cytokines IL- and transforming growth factor
beta (TGF-β) were upregulated, while interferon gamma (IFN-
γ) was downregulated at the tumor site and in the spleens of
the mice treated with THC []. ese findings suggest that
THC could decrease tumor immunogenicity and promote
tumor growth by inhibiting antitumor immunity, probably
via CB receptor-mediated, cytokine-dependent pathway.
Additional studies on the interactions between cannabinoids
and immune cells will provide crucial data to improve the effi-
cacy and safety of cannabinoid therapy in oncology [].
SYNTHETIC CANNABINOIDS WITH
POTENTIAL ANTITUMOR EFFECTS
Most synthetic cannabinoids, including dronabinol, nabi-
lone, and synthetic CBD are CB and CB receptor ligands [].
Studies in cells and animals show that they produce similar
qualitative physiological, psychoactive, analgesic, anti-inflam-
matory, and anticancer effects to plant-derived cannabinoids,
but they can be up to × more potent than THC [,].
Similar to naturally occurring cannabinoids, synthetic canna-
binoid agonists also demonstrated anticancer effects in certain
cancer cell lines in vitro [,]. Oil and alcohol-based drops or
capsules of dronabinol and nabilone (synthetic THC) as well
as synthetic CBD are approved to treat cytostatic-induced
nausea/vomiting in cancer patients and to stimulate appetite
in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome [].
Recently, a subclass of compounds emerged that act on
metabolic enzymes involved in the regulation of ECS activity,
such as inhibitors of FAAH which increase the levels of endog-
enous cannabinoid AEA. ey were developed with the pur-
pose to treat a variety of neurological diseases, chronic pain,
obesity, and cancer []. Astudy investigating the combination
of the synthetic analogue of AEA Met-F-AEA and the selective
irreversible carbamate-based FAAH inhibitor URB showed
that they synergistically inhibited epidermal growth factor
(EGF)-induced proliferative and chemotactic activity of non-
small cell lung cancer cell lines A and H []. Moreover,
the two FAAH inhibitors URB and arachidonoyl serotonin
(AA-HT) had antimetastatic effects on A lung cancer cell
metastasis []. However, recently in France, the first-in-human
phase I clinical trial of an experimental FAAH inhibitor BIA
-, for neuropathic pain treatment, ended up tragically;
one person died and other four had irreversible brain damage
[,]. e magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed evi-
dence of deep cerebral hemorrhage and necrosis in the affected
patients []. Other clinical trials conducted on FAAH inhibi-
tors are Merck’s MK-, Pfizer’s PF-, and Vernalis’
V; no adverse effects were reported with these agents
and they were considered safe in humans [,,]. us, it
could be speculated that the negative effects of BIA -
occurred because the drug may have interacted with a wrong
and unexpected molecular target []. Nevertheless, no FAAH
inhibitor is yet approved for therapeutic use.
To summarize, the antitumor effects of synthetic canna-
binoids such as the inhibition of cell growth, viability, prolif-
eration and invasion, enhanced apoptosis, and suppression of
specific proinflammatory cytokines are generally similar to the
antitumor effects of plant-derived cannabinoids. Moreover,
synthetic cannabinoids have the potential to be even more
selective and potent than their natural counterparts and, thus,
represent a promising therapeutic approach [,].
INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL
LEGAL BASIS FOR THE USE OF
CANNABINOIDS
As the number of studies investigating the medical and
therapeutic potential of cannabinoids has increased in recent
years, it is necessary to change the legislation on the use, cul-
tivation, and marketing of cannabinoids. is should, how-
ever, be done with extreme care. In the Republic of Slovenia,
the legislator made a significant progress in this area in ,
which will be elaborated below.
In the EU Member States, the basis for developing and
passing the legislation on cannabinoid use is provided by
7
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
international conventions, including: i) the United Nations
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs,  [] and the 
Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs,
ii) the Convention on Psychotropic Substances  [], and
iii) the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances  [].
e United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic
in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances provides
additional legal mechanisms for enforcing the  Single
Convention on Narcotic Drugs and the  Convention on
Psychotropic Substances. Much of the treaty is devoted to
fighting organized crime, but it also prohibits possession of
drugs for personal use saying that “Subject to its constitutional
principles and the basic concepts of its legal system, each Party
shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish as
a criminal offence under its domestic law, when committed
intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of nar-
cotic drugs or psychotropic substances for personal consump-
tion contrary to the provisions of the Conventions”, and this
includes the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush and can-
nabis plant for the production of narcotic drugs [].
e United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic
Drugs,  sets out four Schedules. Substances controlled
by the state are set out in Schedule I and Schedule II, prepa-
rations in Schedule III, whereas Schedule IV defines drugs,
such as heroin. e Single Conventions Schedules range from
most restrictive to least restrictive, as follows: Schedule IV,
Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule III. Cannabis, cannabis resin,
extracts and tinctures are included in the Schedule IV of e
Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC, synonym delta--THC) is included in the Schedule I
of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances. Delta--THC
and its stereoisomers, including dronabinol, are listed in the
Addendum  to the Convention on Psychotropic Substances.
Nabilone is not controlled under international law [].
Under the EU regulatory framework, the subject mat-
ter is regulated by Directive //EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of November  on the
Community code relating to medicinal products for human
use []. Pursuant to the Article  of Directive //EC, this
Directive shall not apply to medicinal products prepared in a
pharmacy in accordance with a medical prescription, medic-
inal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the
prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia, and medicinal products
intended for research and development trials. is Directive
also allowed the use of medicinal products for human use,
intended to be placed on the market in the Member States
and either prepared industrially or manufactured by a method
involving an industrial process. is made cannabinoid-based
medicinal products available in all the Member States, pro-
vided they are permitted by the national legislation [].
In the Republic of Slovenia, illicit drugs including cannabis,
are governed by the following regulations: i) Production of and
Trade in Illicit Drugs Act [], ii) Act Regulating the Prevention
of the Use of Illicit Drugs and the Treatment of Drug Users [],
iii) Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia[], iv) Decree
on the classification of illicit drugs [], v) Rules on method and
form of record-keeping and of reports on illicit drugs [], and
vi) the Rules governing the procedures for the issue of licenses
for illicit drugs marketing [].
As previously mentioned, in  the adoption of the
Decree amending the Decree on the classification of illicit
drugs [] was made. is Decree removed cannabis from
Schedule I and placed it under Schedule II, with the note
that the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes is permit-
ted in accordance with the Medicinal Products Act [] and
Pharmacy Services Act [], and in accordance with the
rules and regulations governing the prescribing of cannabi-
noid-based drugs.
e aforementioned amendment to the Decree on the
classification of illicit drugs now allows patients to use medic-
inal cannabis as a means of treatment, including the canna-
bis plant and cannabis resin. Medicinal products are thus not
limited anymore to products containing nabilone or cannabis
extracts, but also extend to tinctures adjusted and harmonized
to delta--THC, as long as they meet the conditions laid down
in the Medicinal Products Act.
Changes in the legislation on the use of cannabinoids for
medical purposes and inclusion of these compounds in the
list of medicinal products needs to be coordinated with the
changes in both labor law and the regulation of workplace
drug testing. Naturally, any change should be adopted in
strict agreement with work, health, and safety regulations and
ensure smooth workflow for the employees.
CONCLUSION
Cannabinoids are a large and important class of complex
compounds that have a promising therapeutic potential for
the treatment of variety of diseases, including cancer. In this
review, we focused on studies that provided evidence for anti-
cancer effects of plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids
and their potential mechanisms of action. Cannabinoids
were able to effectively modulate tumor growth in different
in vitro and in vivo cancer models, however, these anticancer
effects appears to be dependent on cancer type and drug dose.
Understanding how cannabinoids are able to modulate essen-
tial cellular processes involved in tumorigenesis, such as the
progression through the cell cycle, cell proliferation and cell
death, as well as the interactions between cannabinoids and
immune system are crucial for improving existing medica-
tions and developing new therapeutic approaches.
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
8
Although still strict, the legislation on the use of canna-
bis-based medications has been improved, especially fol-
lowing the promising results of related basic research. e
Republic of Slovenia established a legal basis for the use of
cannabinoids in the years  and . e increasing popu-
larity of cannabis and cannabis-based medication should lead
to clear regulatory guidelines on their use, in the near future.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
e authors acknowledge Jan Schmidt for his initial help in
preparing this manuscript.
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
e authors declare no conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
[] Touw M. e religious and medicinal uses of cannabis in China,
India and Tibet. JPsychoactive Drugs ;():-
https://doi.org/./...
[] Robinson SM, Adinoff, B. e classification of substance use disor-
ders: Historical, contextual, and conceptual considerations. Behav
Sci (Basel) ;():.
https://doi.org/./bs.
[] Zuardi AW. History of cannabis as a medicine: Areview. Rev Bras
Psiquiatr ;():-
https://doi.org/./S-.
[] American Herbal Pharmacopoeia® [Internet]. Scotts Valley:
American Herbal Pharmacopoeia®;  [cited  May ].
Available from:
http://www.herbal-ahp.org/.
[] Bifulco M, Pisanti S. Medicinal use of cannabis in Europe: e fact
that more countries legalize the medicinal use of cannabis should
not become an argument for unfettered and uncontrolled use.
EMBO Rep ;():-.
https://doi.org/./embr..
[] Ko GD, Bober SL, Mindra S, Moreau JM. Medical cannabis-e
Canadian perspective. JPain Res ;:-
https://doi.org/./JPR.S.
[] Birdsall SM, Birdsall TC, Tims LA. e use of medical marijuana in
cancer. Curr Oncol Rep ;():
https://doi.org/./s---.
[] Davis MP. Cannabinoids for symptom management and cancer
therapy: e evidence. JNatl Compr Canc Netw ;():-
https://doi.org/./jnccn...
[] National Cancer Institute [Internet]. USA: National
Cancer Institute;  [cited  May ].Available from:
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.
[] Munson AE, Harris LS, Friedman MA, Dewey W L, CarchmanRA.
Antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids. J Natl Cancer Inst
;():-.
https://doi.org/./jnci/...
[] Müller L, Radtke A, Decker J, Koch M, Belge G. e synthetic can-
nabinoid Win ,- elicits in human cancer cell lines. Anticancer
Res ;():-.
https://doi.org/./anticanres..
[] Pertwee RG. Pharmacology of cannabinoid CB and CB receptors.
Pharmacol er ;():-
https://doi.org/./S-()-.
[] Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA,
GriffinG, et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that
binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science ;():-
https://doi.org/./science..
[] Devane WA, Dysarz FA rd, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Howlett AC.
Determination and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in
rat brain. Mol Pharmacol ;():-.
[] Munro S, omas KL, Abu-Shaar M. Molecular characterization of
a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature ;():-
https://doi.org/./a.
[] McKinney MK, Cravatt BF. Structure and function of fatty acid
amide hydrolase. Annu Rev Biochem ;:-
https://doi.org/./annurev.biochem....
[] Guindon J, Hohmann AG. e endocannabinoid system and pain.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets ;():-
https://doi.org/./.
[] Nadolska K, Gos R . e role of endocannabinoid system in physio-
logical and pathological processes in the eye. [Article in Polish]. Klin
Oczna ;(-):-.
[] Fogli S, Breschi MC. e molecular bases of cannabinoid action in
cancer. Cancer erapy ;:-.
[] Javid FA, Phillips RM, Afshinjavid S, Verde R, Ligresti A.
Cannabinoid pharmacology in cancer research: A new hope for
cancer patients? Eur J Pharmacol ;:-
https://doi.org/./j.ejphar....
[] Skosnik PD, Cortes-Briones JA, Hajos M. It’s all in the rhythm:
e role of cannabinoids in neural oscillations and psychosis. Biol
Psychiatry ;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.biopsych....
[] Console-Bram L, Marcu J, Abood ME. Cannabinoid recep-
tors: Nomenclature and pharmacological principles. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.pnpbp....
[] Brown AJ. Novel cannabinoid receptors. Br J Pharmacol
;():-.
https://doi.org/./sj.bjp..
[] Morice AH, Geppetti P. Cough. : e type vanilloid receptor: a
sensory receptor for cough. orax ;():-
https://doi.org/./thx...
[] Latorre JG, Schmidt EB. Cannabis, cannabinoids, and cerebral
metabolism: Potential applications in stroke and disorders of the
central nervous system. Curr Cardiol Rep ;():
https://doi.org/./s---.
[] De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Moriello AS, Allara M, Bisogno T,
Petrosino S, et al. Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoid-en-
riched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels and endocannabinoid
metabolic enzymes. Br J Pharmacol ;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.-...x.
[] Fogli S, Nieri P, Chicca A, Adinolfi B, Mariotti V, Iacopetti P, et
al. Cannabinoid derivatives induce cell death in pancreatic MIA
PaCa- cells via a receptor-independent mechanism. FEBS Lett
;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.febslet....
[] Perez-Gomez E, Andradas C, Blasco-Benito S, Caffarel MM,
Garcia-Taboada E, Villa-Morales, et al. Role of cannabinoid recep-
tor CB in HER pro-oncogenic signaling in breast cancer. JNatl
Cancer Inst ;():djv.
https://doi.org/./jnci/djv.
[] Caffarel MM, Andradas C, Mira E, Perez-Gomez E, Cerutti C,
Moreno-Bueno G, et al. Cannabinoids reduce ErbB-driven breast
cancer progression through Akt inhibition. Mol Cancer ;:
https://doi.org/./---.
[] Vercelli C, Barbero R, Cuniberti B, Racca S, Abbadessa G, PiccioneF,
et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid  expression and func-
tionality in MCF- cells: A preliminary investigation. J Breast
Cancer ;():-.
https://doi.org/./jbc.....
[] Chung SC, Hammarsten P, Josefsson A, Stattin P, Granfors T,
Egevad L, et al. Ahigh cannabinoid CB receptor immunoreactivity
is associated with disease severity and outcome in prostate cancer.
Eur J Cancer ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.ejca....
9
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
[] Cipriano M, Haggstrom J, Hammarsten P, Fowler CJ. Association
between cannabinoid CB receptor expression and Akt signalling
in prostate cancer. PLoS One ;():e
https://doi.org/./journal.pone..
[] Velasco G, Hernandez S, Davila D, Lorente M. e use of canna-
binoids as anticancer agents. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol
Psychiatry ;:-.
https://doi.org/./j.pnpbp....
[] ors L, Bergh A, Persson E, Hammarsten P, Stattin P, Egevad L, et
al. Fatty acid amide hydrolase in prostate cancer: Association with
disease severity and outcome, CB receptor expression and regula-
tion by IL-. PLoS One ;():e
https://doi.org/./journal.pone..
[] Sarfaraz S, Adhami VM, Syed DN, Afaq F, Mukhtar H.
Cannabinoids for cancer treatment: Progress and promise. Cancer
Res ;():-.
https://doi.org/./-.CAN--.
[] Orellana-Serradell O, Poblete CE, Sanchez C, Castellon EA,
Gallegos I, Huidobro C, et al. Proapoptotic effect of endocannabi-
noids in prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep ;():-
https://doi.org/./or...
[] Sanchez MG, Sanchez AM, Collado B, Malagarie-Cazenave S,
Olea N, Carmena MJ, et al. Expression of the transient recep-
tor potential vanilloid  (TRPV) in LNCaP and PC- pros-
tate cancer cells and in human prostate tissue. Eur J Pharmacol
;(-):-.
https://doi.org/./j.ejphar....
[] Pecze L, Josvay K, Blum W, Petrovics G, Vizler C, Olah Z, et al.
Activation of endogenous TRPV fails to induce overstimula-
tion-based cytotoxicity in breast and prostate cancer cells but not in
pain-sensing neurons. Biochim Biophys Acta ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.bbamcr....
[] De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Schiano Moriello A, Iappelli M, Verde
R, Stott CG, et al. Non-THC cannabinoids inhibit prostate carci-
noma growth in vitro and in vivo: Pro-apoptotic effects and under-
lying mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol ;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.-...x.
[] Pineiro R, Maffucci T, Falasca M. e putative cannabinoid recep-
tor GPR defines a novel autocrine loop in cancer cell prolifera-
tion. Oncogene ;():-.
https://doi.org/./onc...
[] Mukhopadhyay B, Schuebel K, Mukhopadhyay P, Cinar R,
Godlewski G, Xiong K, et al. Cannabinoid receptor  promotes
hepatocellular carcinoma initiation and progression through mul-
tiple mechanisms. Hepatology ;():-
https://doi.org/./hep..
[] Xu X, Liu Y, Huang S, Liu G, Xie C, Zhou J, et al. Overexpression
of cannabinoid receptors CB and CB correlates with improved
prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Genet
Cytogenet ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.cancergencyto....
[] Preet A, Qamri Z, Nasser MW, Prasad A, Shilo K, Zou X, et al.
Cannabinoid receptors, CB and CB, as novel targets for inhibition
of non-small cell lung cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Prev
Res (Phila) ;():-
https://doi.org/./-.CAPR--.
[] Freund P, Porpaczy EA, Le T, Gruber M, Pausz C, Staber P, et al.
Cannabinoid receptors are overexpressed in CLL but of lim-
ited potential for therapeutic exploitation. PLoS One ;():
e.
https://doi.org/./journal.pone..
[] Michalski CW, Oti FE, Erkan M, Sauliunaite D, Bergmann F,
PacherP, et al. Cannabinoids in pancreatic cancer: Correlation with
survival and pain. Int J Cancer ;():-
https://doi.org/./ijc..
[] Chakravarti B, Ravi J, Ganju RK. Cannabinoids as therapeutic
agents in cancer: Current status and future implications. Oncotarget
;():-.
https://doi.org/./oncotarget..
[] Carracedo A, Gironella M, Lorente M, Garcia S, Guzman M,
Velasco G, et al. Cannabinoids induce apoptosis of pancreatic
tumor cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes. Cancer
Res ;():-
https://doi.org/./-.CAN--.
[] Zhao Z, Yang J, Zhao H, Fang X, Li H. Cannabinoid receptor  is
upregulated in melanoma. JCancer Res er ;():-
https://doi.org/./-..
[] Malfitano AM, Ciaglia E, G angemi G, Gazzerro P, Laezza C, Bifulco
M. Update on the endocannabinoid system as an anticancer target.
Expert Opin er Targets ;():-
https://doi.org/./...
[] Nomura DK, Long JZ, Niessen S, Hoover HS, Ng SW, CravattBF.
Monoacylglycerol lipase regulates a fatty acid network that pro-
motes cancer pathogenesis. Cell ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.cell....
[] Velasco G, Sanchez C, Guzman M. Endocannabinoids and cancer.
Handb Exp Pharmacol ;:-
https://doi.org/./----_.
[] Guzman M. Cannabinoids: Potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev
Cancer ;():-.
https://doi.org/./nrc.
[] Demuth DG, Molleman A. Cannabinoid signalling. Life Sci
;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.lfs....
[] Velasco G, Sanchez C, Guzman M. Anticancer mechanisms of can-
nabinoids. Curr Oncol ;(Suppl):S-S
https://doi.org/./co...
[] Caffarel MM, Andradas C, Perez-Gomez E, Guzman M, Sanchez
C. Cannabinoids: A new hope for breast cancer therapy? Cancer
Treat Rev ;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.ctrv....
[] Andre CM, Hausman JF, Guerriero G. Cannabis sativa: e plant of
the thousand and one molecules. Front Plant Sci ;:
https://doi.org/./fpls...
[] Romano B, Pagano E, Orlando P, Capasso R, Cascio MG, PertweeR,
et al. Pure delta-tetrahydrocannabivarin and a Cannabis sativa
extract with high content in delta-tetrahydrocannabivarin inhibit
nitrite production in murine peritoneal macrophages. Pharmacol
Res ;(Pt A):-.
https://doi.org/./j.phrs....
[] Showalter VM, Compton DR, Martin BR, Abood ME. Evaluation
of binding in a transfected cell line expressing a peripheral canna-
binoid receptor (CB): Identification of cannabinoid receptor sub-
type selective ligands. JPharmacol Exp er ;():-.
[] Izzo AA, Borrell, F, Capasso R, Di Marzo V, Mechoulam R. Non-
psychotropic plant cannabinoids: New therapeutic opportunities
from an ancient herb. Trends Pharmacol Sci ;():-
https://doi.org/./j.tips....
[] Grotenhermen F, Muller-Vahl K. e therapeutic potential of can-
nabis and cannabinoids. Dtsch Arztebl Int ;(-):-
https://doi.org/./arztebl...
[] Hong S, Sowndhararajan K, Joo T, Lim C, Cho H, Kim S, et al.
Ethanol and supercritical fluid extracts of hemp seed (Cannabis
sativa L.) increase gene expression of antioxidant enzymes in
HepGcells. Asian Pac J Reprod ;():-.
https://doi.org/./S-()-.
[] McAllister SD, Soroceanu L, Desprez PY. e antitumor activity
of plant-derived non-psychoactive cannabinoids. JNeuroimmune
Pharmacol ;():-
https://doi.org/./s---y.
[] Cridge BJ, Rosengren RJ. Critical appraisal of the potential use
of cannabinoids in cancer management. Cancer Manag Res
;:-. https://doi.org/./CMAR.S.
[] Hart S, Fischer OM, Ullrich A. Cannabinoids induce cancer cell
proliferation via tumor necrosis factor alpha-converting enzyme
(TACE/ADAM)-mediated transactivation of the epidermal
growth factor receptor. Cancer Res ;():-.
https://doi.org/./-.CAN--.
[] Shrivastava A, Kuzontkoski PM, Groopman JE, Prasad A.
Cannabidiol induces programmed cell death in breast cancer cells
Barbara Dariš, et al.: Cannabinoids and cancer
10
by coordinating the cross-talk between apoptosis and autophagy.
Mol Cancer er ;():-.
https://doi.org/./-.MCT--.
[] Solinas M, Massi P, Cinquina V, Valenti M, Bolognini D, GariboldiM,
et al. Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid compound,
inhibits proliferation and invasion in U-MG and TG glioma
cells through a multitarget effect. PLoS One ;():e
https://doi.org/./journal.pone..
[] Sharma M, Hudson J, Adomat H, Guns E, Cox M. In vitro anti-
cancer activity of plant-derived cannabidiol on prostate cancer cell
lines. Pharmacol Pharm ;():-
https://doi.org/./pp...
[] Marcu JP, Christian RT, Lau D, Zielinski AJ, Horowitz MP, LeeJ, et
al. Cannabidiol enhances the inhibitory effects of delta-tetrahy-
drocannabinol on human glioblastoma cell proliferation and sur-
vival. Mol Cancer er ;():-
https://doi.org/./-.MCT--.
[] Nagarkatti P, Pandey R, Rieder SA, Hegde VL, Nagarkatti M.
Cannabinoids as novel anti-inflammatory drugs. Future Med Chem
;():-.
https://doi.org/./fmc...
[] McKallip RJ, Nagarkatti M, Nagarkatti PS. --tetrahydrocannabinol
enhances breast cancer growth and metastasis by suppression of
the antitumor immune response. JImmunol ;():-
https://doi.org/./jimmunol....
[] Zhu LX, Sharma S, Stolina M, Gardner B, Roth MD, Tashkin DP,
et al. --tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits antitumor immunity by a
CB receptor-mediated, cytokine-dependent pathway. JImmunol
;():-.
https://doi.org/./jimmunol....
[] Hanlon KE, Lozano-Ondoua AN, Umaretiya PJ, Symons-
LiguoriAM, Chandramouli A, Moy JK, et al. Modulation of breast
cancer cell viability by a cannabinoid receptor  agonist, JWH-, is
calcium dependent. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) ;:-.
https://doi.org/./BCTT.S.
[] Castaneto MS, Gorelick DA, Desrosiers NA, Hartman RL , PirardS,
Huestis MA. Synthetic cannabinoids: Epidemiology, pharma-
codynamics, and clinical implications. Drug Alcohol Depend
;:-.
https://doi.org/./j.drugalcdep....
[] Debruyne D, Le Boisselier R. Emerging drugs of abuse: Current
perspectives on synthetic cannabinoids. Subst Abuse Rehabil
;:-.
https://doi.org/./SAR.S.
[] Guzman M, Sanchez C, Galve-Roperh I. Cannabinoids and cell fate.
Pharmacol er ;():-
https://doi.org/./S-()-.
[] Otrubova K , Ezzili C, Boger DL. e discovery and development of
inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Bioorg Med Chem
Lett ;():-.
https://doi.org/./j.bmcl....
[] Ravi J, Sneh A, Shilo K, Nasser MW, Ganju RK. FAAH inhibition
enhances anandamide mediated anti-tumorigenic effects in non-
small cell lung cancer by downregulating the EGF/EGFR pathway.
Oncotarget ;():-
https://doi.org/./oncotarget..
[] Winkler K, Ramer R, Dithmer S, Ivanov I, Merkord J, Hinz B. Fatty
acid amide hydrolase inhibitors confer anti-invasive and antimeta-
static effects on lung cancer cells. Oncotarget ;():-
https://doi.org/./oncotarget..
[] Kaur R, Sidhu P, Singh S. What failed BIA - phase I clinical
trial? Global speculations and recommendations for future Phase I
trials. JPharmacol Pharmacother ;():-
https://doi.org/./-X..
[] Wang Q. e price of mistakes in clinical trials [Internet]. NY: e
Rockefeller university;June  [cited on: May]. Available from:
http://selections.rockefeller.edu/the-price-of-mistakes-in-clinical
-trials/.
[] U.S. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. Bethesda: U.S.
National Library of Medicine;  [cited on:  May ].
Available from
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT.
[] U.S. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. Bethesda: U.S.
National Library of Medicine;  [cited on:  May ].
Available from
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT.
[] Slovenia. International Treaties. Act notifying the succession of
the Republic of Slovenia to UnitedNations conventions and con-
ventions adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
No/. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice; .
[] Čufar A. Prescribing of cannabinoids – A regulatory view.
Pharmaceutical Journal of Slovenia ;:-.
[] European Union. Directive //EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of November  on the Community code
relating to medicinal products for human use. Brussels: European
Parliament; .
[] Slovenia. Production of and Trade in Illicit Drugs Act. No/.
Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice; .
[] Slovenia. Act Regulating the Prevention of the Use of Illicit Drugs
and the Treatment of Drug Users. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry of
Justice; .
[] Slovenia. Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. No/.
Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice; .
[] Slovenia. Decree on the classification of illicit drugs. No /.
Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice; .
[] Slovenia. Rules on method and form of record-keeping and of
reports on illicit drugs. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice;
.
[] Slovenia. Rules governing the procedures for the issue of licenses
for illicit drugs marketing. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice;
.
[] Slovenia. Decree amending the De cree on the classification of illicit
drugs. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice; .
[] Slovenia. Medicinal Products Act. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry
of Health; .
[] Slovenia. Pharmacy Services Act. No/. Ljubljana: Ministry
of Health; .
... Since the first evidence of the anticancer effects of natural cannabinoids [10,9], several substantial preclinical investigations into THCs and their synthetic derivatives have been performed to describe their anticancer efficacy in multiple cancer models for millennia [11,12]. THCs inhibit adenyl cyclase after the ECS activation, which significantly leads to the activation of various intracellular metabolic pathways, such as PI3K, MAPK, AKT, and ceramide accumulation in cancer cells [13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tetrahydrocannabinols (THCs) antagonize the CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, whose signaling to the endocannabinoid system is essential for controlling cell survival and proliferation as well as psychoactive effects. Most tumor cells express a much higher level of CB1 and CB2; THCs have been investigated as potential cancer therapeutic due to their cannabimimetic properties. To date, THCs have been prescribed as palliative medicine to cancer patients but not as an anticancer modality. Growing evidence of preclinical research demonstrates that THCs reduce tumor progression by stimulating apoptosis and autophagy and inhibiting two significant hallmarks of cancer pathogenesis: metastasis and angiogenesis. However, the degree of their anticancer effects depends on the origin of the tumor site, the expression of cannabinoid receptors on tumor cells, and the dosages and types of THC. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on the molecular processes that THCs target for their anticancer effects. It also emphasizes the substantial knowledge gaps that should be of concern in future studies. We also discuss the therapeutic effects of THCs and the problems that will need to be addressed in the future. Clarifying unanswered queries is a prerequisite to translating the THCs into an effective anticancer regime.
... In experimental models, psychoactive THC and nonpsychoactive CBD disturbed the disease progression, and its effects on signaling pathways within cancer cells following activation of G-protein coupled cannabinoid-receptors (CB-Rs), other receptors such as GPR55 and TRPV1, and in a receptor-independent way. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that cannabinoids can activate these receptors, leading to anti-tumorigenic activity in most cases (11). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background In a pilot study using both cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) as single agents in advanced cancer patients undergoing palliative care in Thailand, the doses were generally well tolerated, and the outcome measure of total symptom distress scores showed overall symptom benefit. The current study aims to determine the intensity of the symptoms experienced by breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, to explore the microbiome profile, cytokines, and bacterial metabolites before and after the treatment with cannabis oil or no cannabis oil, and to study the pharmacokinetics parameters and pharmacogenetics profile of the doses. Methods A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial will be conducted on the metastatic breast cancer cases currently receiving chemotherapy at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH), Bangkok, Thailand. Block randomization will be used to allocate the patients into three groups: Ganja Oil (THC 2 mg/ml; THC 0.08 mg/drop, and CBD 0.02 mg/drop) group), Metta Osot (THC 81 mg/ml; THC 3 mg/drop), and placebo oil. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), microbiome profile, cytokines, and bacterial metabolites will be assessed before and after the interventions.
... Cannabinoids are terpenophenolic compounds derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L. that interact directly with cannabinoid receptors, ion channels, and nuclear receptors comprising the endogenous endocannabinoid system, with reported anti-cancer effects [79][80][81]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer worldwide. Chemotherapy (CT) is essential for the treatment of BC, but is often accompanied by several side effects, including taste alterations, due to different mechanisms. Although dysgeusia is usually underestimated by clinicians, it is considered very worrying and disturbing by cancer patients undergoing CT, because it induces changes in dietary choices and social habits, affecting their physical and psychological health, with a profound impact on their quality of life. Several strategies and therapies have been proposed to prevent or alleviate CT-induced dysgeusia. This review aimed to evaluate the available evidence on prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical consequences, and strategies for managing dysgeusia in BC patients receiving CT. We queried the National Library of Medicine, the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, performing a search strategy using database-specific keywords. We found that the literature on this topic is scarce, methodologically limited, and highly heterogeneous in terms of study design and criteria for patient inclusion, making it difficult to obtain definitive results and make recommendations for clinical practice.
... On the other hand, the role of cannabinoid-based drugs in the modulation of oxidative stress processes that underpin cognitive impairments emerged and recognized the endocannabinoid system (ECS) as the leading player in this neuroprotective activity [3]. Nevertheless, in the last years, most of the interest pointed toward increasing the knowledge on the antitumoral activity of cannabinoids, which depends on their capacity to interact with ECS networks or other cellular pathways, affecting the development/progression of diseases [4,5]. Specifically, an increasing number of reports highlighted the role of cannabinoids in cancer spreading, invasion, angiogenesis, migration, and metastatic mechanism [6][7][8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Colon cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In recent years, cannabinoids have been extensively studied for their potential anticancer effects and symptom management. Several in vitro studies reported anandamide’s (AEA) ability to block cancer cell proliferation and migration, but evidence from in vivo studies is still lacking. Thus, in this study, the effects of AEA exposure in zebrafish embryos transplanted with HCT116 cells were evaluated. Totally, 48 hpf xenografts were exposed to 10 nM AEA, 10 nM AM251, one of the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1) antagonist/inverse agonists, and to AEA + AM251, to verify the specific effect of AEA treatment. AEA efficacy was evaluated by confocal microscopy, which demonstrated that these xenografts presented a smaller tumor size, reduced tumor angiogenesis, and lacked micrometastasis formation. To gain deeper evidence into AEA action, microscopic observations were completed by molecular analyses. RNA seq performed on zebrafish transcriptome reported the downregulation of genes involved in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and the immune system. Conversely, HCT116 cell transcripts resulted not affected by AEA treatment. In vitro HCT116 culture, in fact, confirmed that AEA exposure did not affect cell proliferation and viability, thus suggesting that the reduced tumor size mainly depends on direct effects on the fish rather than on the transplanted cancer cells. AEA reduced cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis, as suggested by socs3 and pcnp mRNAs and Vegfc protein levels, and exerted anti-inflammatory activity, as indicated by the reduction of il-11a, mhc1uba, and csf3b mRNA. Of note, are the results obtained in groups exposed to AM251, which presence nullifies AEA’s beneficial effects. In conclusion, this study promotes the efficacy of AEA in personalized cancer therapy, as suggested by its ability to drive tumor growth and metastasis, and strongly supports the use of zebrafish xenograft as an emerging model platform for cancer studies.
... FE was slightly more active than corresponding CBD. As the effect is non-significant and relatively small it can be assumed that multi target principles probably don´t play a major role.CBD induces cell cycle arrest in cancer cells and can inhibit tumor cells proliferation(121).Studies had shown that CBD inhibited cell growth, induced cell cycle arrest at the G 0/G1 phase, and apoptosis in human cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa, ME-180 and SiHa) (120), and gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells(122). Following confirmation that cannabis extracts and CBD have an anti-proliferative effect, cell cycle analysis was performed in activated T lymphocytes to evaluate whether treatments can induce a cell cycle arrest. ...
Thesis
Cannabis sativa has been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of different inflammatory diseases and is one of the most ancient herbal remedies. Its use is prohibited in many countries worldwide because of its mind-altering properties. Therefore, new formulations have been developed which contain little or no THC and are rich in other cannabinoids. Cannabis is used for the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, however, its potential effects and mode of action are not yet understood clearly. In this research work, in vitro cell-based immunomodulatory effects of different cannabis extracts were investigated. Human T lymphocytes were used for our investigations because of their role in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis. The phytochemical profiling of extracts was done using HPLC-PDA-ELSD-MS analysis. The bioactivity of cannabis extracts was analysed in vitro using flow cytometry-based techniques. Proliferation and apoptosis/necrosis were assessed by CFSE and annexin V/propidium iodide staining, cell cycle distribution by propidium iodide staining of DNA. The viability of the cells was analysed using WST-1 assay, DNA damage was measured using single-cell gel electrophoresis and ROS was measured via EPR spectroscopy, respectively. The effect on T lymphocyte activation was measured via CD25 and CD69 marker expression, degranulation, and altered expression levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as well as autophagy induction using flow cytometry. The influence on the transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-кB) was also analysed via flow cytometry, for which Jurkat reporter cell lines were used. Additionally, the effect on the proliferation and IL-2 production was examined using specific CB2 and TRPV1 receptor antagonists. Santhica (SA) extract contained mostly cannabigerol acid (CBGA) and did not influence the proliferation of activated T lymphocytes but inhibited the activation and functionality by inhibition of CD25 marker expression, degranulation and IL-2 cytokine production in concentrations not inducing apoptosis, necrosis, or affecting viability or causing DNA strand break. Fidora (FI) extract contains cannabidiol acid (CBDA) and CBD. Non-toxic concentrations inhibited T cell signalling via an IL-2 dependent mechanism. Further investigation revealed a reduced expression of CD25 and CD69 activation markers, degranulation as well as reduced IL-2 and TNF-α production of activated T lymphocytes. The Fedora (FE) extract which is rich in CBD was investigated in comparison to pure CBD. FE had, as CBD, stronger immunosuppressive effects than SA and FI. FE extract and CBD both impaired proliferation, activation, and functionality of T lymphocytes. They induced cell cycle arrest and specific impairment of T cell signalling via an IL-2 dependent mechanism as well as via inducing autophagy. AP-1 and NFAT inhibition was found for both FE and the corresponding concentrations of CBD, which could explain the inhibitory effects of FE and CBD on T lymphocyte proliferation, CD25 marker expression, lymphocyte degranulation and IL-2 and IFN-γ production. The specific CB2 and TRPV1 receptor antagonists SR144528 and A78416B reversed FE induced inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and IL-2 production as well as the CBD induced inhibition of proliferation. Accordingly, most of the immunosuppressive effects mediated by FE can be explained by its CBD content. However, related to equivalent CBD concentrations, FE extract is slightly more effective for the inhibition of proliferation (IC50: FE = 3.8; CBD = 4.7), degranulation (IC50: FE = 2.9; CBD = 9.5), NFAT (IC50: FE = 1.5; CBD = 4.4), indicating that other compounds present in the extract may be relevant for the effects. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that cannabis extracts as well as CBD alone can be potential immune modulators. Further in vivo research is required to corroborate these effects.
Article
Full-text available
Despite technological advances in radiation therapy for cancer treatment, many patient populations still experience mediocre survival percentages, local control, and quality of life. Additionally, much of the world lacks access to expensive, modern treatment options. The need for innovative, cost-effective solutions that can improve patient treatment outcomes is essential. Phytomedicines have been shown to induce apoptotic tumor cell death, diminish tumor progression, reduce cancer incidence, alleviate harmful hypoxic conditions, and more. While an ample amount of research is available that characterizes many phytomedicines as having anti-cancer properties that increase tumor cell killing/control and mitigate the harmful side effects of radiation damage, little work has been done to investigate the synergistic effect of phytoradiotherapy: combining radiation treatment with phytomedicines. In this study, a protocol for testing the radiosensitizing effects of phytomedicines was validated and used to investigate the well-known plant based medicine cannabidiol (CBD) and the lesser-known medicinal fruit Bitter Melon. Additionally, based on its high concentration of plant hemoglobin which has been shown to abate hypoxia, the African-indigenous Justicia plant was tested in pancreatic adenocarcinoma mouse models. The studies reveal that these phytomedicines can effectively enhance tumor cell killing, minimize tumor growth, and prolong mice survival. There is certainly the need for additional research in this regard, however, phytoradiotherapy: the use of phytomedicines to enhance radiation therapy treatment outcomes, continues to show potential as a promising, innovative way to improve cancer care.
Book
Full-text available
Veteriner Hekimlik dünyanın en eski mesleklerinden birisidir. Yalnızca hayvan sağlığı ile değil aynı zamanda hayvansal gıdaların uygun şekilde insan tüketimine sunulması ve dolayısıyla halk sağlığı ile doğrudan ilişkili bir meslek grubudur. Sağlıklı insan, sağlıklı hayvan ve sağlıklı bir dünya için çalışan veteriner hekimlik mesleği etik değerlere bağlı bilimsel yaklaşımlarla sağlık alanında hizmet sunmaktadır. Veteriner hekimlik mesleği, fizyolojik, metabolik ve anatomik olarak farklı birçok hayvan türü ile ilgilenmektedir. Bu türler arasında kanatlılar, memeliler, sürüngenler, sıcakkanlılar, soğukkanlılar, kara hayvanları, deniz hayvanları gibi çok geniş bir alanda hizmet vermektedir. Bu canlıların her birinin sağlıklı yaşam alanlarının oluşturulması ekosistem içerisinde önemli yer tutmaktadır. Günümüzde ekonomik değeri olan sığır, koyun, keçi, tavuk gibi evcil hayvanların yanı sıra kedi ve köpek gibi evcil dostlarımız da insan hayatında büyük bir yeri kaplamaktadır. Artık birçok evde kedi ve köpeklerle birlikte yaşanıyor olması, onların ihtiyacı olan yaşam standartlarının da sağlanması koşulunu beraberinde getirmektedir. “Veteriner Hekimlikte Güncel Değerlendirmeler” isimli bu kitabımızda, alanında uzman hekimler tarafından derlenmiş özgün bilimsel konular ve yaklaşımlar ile okuyucularına ışık tutacaktır
Article
Full-text available
The Editorial on the Research Topic "Recent Advances in Nanofabricated Delivery Systems of Bioactive Components for Food Applications"
Chapter
Bioactive compounds isolated from plant sources are the secondary metabolites that have toxicological or pharmacological properties depending upon their structure. Recently, these compounds have received more attention due to their diverse role in providing protection against various types of pathogenic and non-pathogenic diseases. These miraculous bioactive compounds also pursue pharmacological activities against several microbial pathogens and are also known to exhibit antidiabetic, antipyretic, anticancerous, antidiuretic, and antioxidant properties. Some bioactive compounds extracted from plants such as phenolic compounds, anthocyanidins, flavonoids, tannins, and flavones are found in significantly high concentration in the biosphere, and certain others are present in less amount but their pharmacological as well as commercial importance cannot be denied. The activities of bioactive compounds like flavonoids, polyphenols, not only functions to inhibit microbial growth but also they act synergistically with other drugs which make them ideal for alternative cancer remedies. This chapter provides a general insight into secondary metabolites having antimicrobial and anticancerous properties, their plant source, and their mode of actions.KeywordsBioactive compoundsAntimicrobialAnticancerousHuman health
Article
Full-text available
Background: Studies have revealed that cancer might be treated with cannabinoids since they can influence cancer cell survival. These findings suggest an alternative treatment option to chemo- and radiotherapy, that are associated with numerous adverse side-effects for the patients. Materials and methods: Viability staining was conducted on lung cancer, testicular cancer and neuroblastoma cells treated with different concentrations of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 and the percentage of dead cells was compared. Activity of apoptosis-related enzymes was investigated by the presence of DNA ladder in gel electrophoresis. Results: Treatment with different WIN 55,212-2 concentrations led to a significant dose-dependent reduction of cell viability. A DNA ladder was observed after WIN 55,212-2 treatment of testicular cancer and lung cancer cells. Conclusion: The application of WIN 55,212-2 was found to trigger cell death in the investigated cell lines. The decline in lung cancer and testicular cancer cell viability seems to have been caused by apoptosis. These findings may contribute to development of alternative cancer therapy strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Cannabis has been widely used as a medicinal agent in Eastern medicine with earliest evidence in ancient Chinese practice dating back to 2700 BC. Over time, the use of medical cannabis has been increasingly adopted by Western medicine and is thus a rapidly emerging field that all pain physicians need to be aware of. Several randomized controlled trials have shown a significant and dose-dependent relationship between neuropathic pain relief and tetrahydrocannabinol – the principal psychoactive component of cannabis. Despite this, barriers exist to use from both the patient perspective (cost, addiction, social stigma, lack of understanding regarding safe administration) and the physician perspective (credibility, criminality, clinical evidence, patient addiction, and policy from the governing medical colleges). This review addresses these barriers and draws attention to key concerns in the Canadian medical system, providing updated treatment approaches to help clinicians work with their patients in achieving adequate pain control, reduced narcotic medication use, and enhanced quality of life. This review also includes case studies demonstrating the use of medical marijuana by patients with neuropathic low-back pain, neuropathic pain in fibromyalgia, and neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. While significant preclinical data have demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis for treating pain in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, and cancer, further studies are needed with randomized controlled trials and larger study populations to identify the specific strains and concentrations that will work best with selected cohorts.
Article
Full-text available
Cannabinoids bind not only to classical receptors (CB1 and CB2) but also to certain orphan receptors (GPR55 and GPR119), ion channels (transient receptor potential vanilloid), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Cannabinoids are known to modulate a multitude of monoamine receptors. Structurally, there are 3 groups of cannabinoids. Multiple studies, most of which are of moderate to low quality, demonstrate that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and oromucosal cannabinoid combinations of THC and cannabidiol (CBD) modestly reduce cancer pain. Dronabinol and nabilone are better antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) than certain neuroleptics, but are not better than serotonin receptor antagonists in reducing delayed emesis, and cannabinoids have largely been superseded by neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and olanzapine; both cannabinoids have been recommended for breakthrough nausea and vomiting among other antiemetics. Dronabinol is ineffective in ameliorating cancer anorexia but does improve associated cancer-related dysgeusia. Multiple cancers express cannabinoid receptors directly related to the degree of anaplasia and grade of tumor. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that cannabinoids may have anticancer activity. Paradoxically, cannabinoid receptor antagonists also have antitumor activity. There are few randomized smoked or vaporized cannabis trials in cancer on which to judge the benefits of these forms of cannabinoids on symptoms and the clinical course of cancer. Smoked cannabis has been found to contain Aspergillosis. Immunosuppressed patients should be advised of the risks of using "medical marijuana" in this regard.
Article
Full-text available
This article provides an overview of the history of substance use and misuse and chronicles the long shared history humans have had with psychoactive substances, including alcohol. The practical and personal functions of substances and the prevailing views of society towards substance users are described for selected historical periods and within certain cultural contexts. This article portrays how the changing historical and cultural milieu influences the prevailing medical, moral, and legal conceptualizations of substance use as reflected both in popular opinion and the consensus of the scientific community and represented by the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Finally, this article discusses the efforts to classify substance use disorders (SUDs) and associated psychopathology in the APA compendium. Controversies both lingering and resolved in the field are discussed, and implications for the future of SUD diagnoses are identified.
Article
Full-text available
The use of medical marijuana in cancer care presents a dilemma for both patients and physicians. The scientific evidence is evolving, yet much of the known information is still insufficient to adequately inform patients as to risks and benefits. In addition, evidence-based dosing and administration information on medical marijuana is lacking. Medical marijuana is now legal, on some level, in 24 states plus the District of Columbia, yet is not legal on the federal level. This review addresses the current state of the research, including potential indications, risks and adverse effects, preliminary data on anticancer effects, as well as legal and quality issues. A summary of the clinical trials underway on medical marijuana in the oncology setting is discussed.
Article
Cannabis is one of the most popular drugs on the one side and a medicinal product on the other. It contains about 70 different psychoactive compounds, whose function is still not fully undrestood. International legal framework in the field of illicit drugs is defined by three United Nations Conventions, namely the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, amended in 1972, the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 and the Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. The European Union Member States classify drugs and precursors in accordance with these three conventions. Within the framework of their national laws, the Member States regulate the scope of illicit drugs in different ways in detail, thereby enabling their medical use and preventing their potential abuse at the same time. In Slovenia, recently amended Regulation on the classification of illicit drugs enables the availability of medicines with isolated or synthesized 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, nabilone, and medicines with extracts from cannabis, including tinctures, standardized to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Based on this regulation pharmacists can also compound magistral and galenic medicines from those substances.
Article
The cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CNR1&2) are overexpressed in a variety of malignant diseases and cannabinoids can have noteworthy impact on tumor cell viability and tumor growth. Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) present with very heterogeneous disease characteristics translating into highly differential risk properties. To meet the urgent need for refinement in risk stratification at diagnosis and the search for novel therapies we studied CNR expression and response to cannabinoid treatment in CLL. Expression levels of CNR1&2 were determined in 107 CLL patients by real-time PCR and analyzed with regard to prognostic markers and survival. Cell viability of primary CLL cells was determined in suspension and co-culture after incubation in increasing cannabinoid concentrations under normal and reduced serum conditions and in combination with fludarabine. Impact of cannabinoids on migration of CLL cells towards CXCL12 was determined in transwell plates. We found CNR1&2 to be overexpressed in CLL compared to healthy B-cells. Discriminating between high and low expressing subgroups, only high CNR1 expression was associated with two established high risk markers and conferred significantly shorter overall and treatment free survival. Viability of CLL primary cells was reduced in a dose dependent fashion upon incubation with cannabinoids, however, healthy cells were similarly affected. Under serum reduced conditions, no significant differences were observed within suspension and co-culture, respectively, however, the feeder layer contributed significantly to the survival of CLL cells compared to suspension culture conditions. No significant differences were observed when treating CLL cells with cannabinoids in combination with fludarabine. Interestingly, biologic activity of cannabinoids was independent of both CNR1&2 expression. Finally, we did not observe an inhibition of CXCL12-induced migration by cannabinoids. In contrast to other tumor entities, our data suggest a limited usability of cannabinoids for CLL therapy. Nonetheless, we could define CNR1 mRNA expression as novel prognostic marker.
Article
Vanilloids including capsaicin and resiniferatoxin are potent transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) agonists. TRPV1 overstimulation selectively ablates capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons in animal models in vivo. The cytotoxic mechanisms are based on strong Na+ and Ca2 + influx via TRPV1 channels, which leads to mitochondrial Ca2 + accumulation and necrotic cell swelling. Increased TRPV1 expression levels are also observed in breast and prostate cancer and derived cell lines. Here, we examined whether potent agonist-induced overstimulation mediated by TRPV1 might represent a means for the eradication of prostate carcinoma (PC-3, Du 145, LNCaP) and breast cancer (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, BT-474) cells in vitro. While rat sensory neurons were highly vanilloid-sensitive, normal rat prostate epithelial cells were resistant in vivo. We found TRPV1 to be expressed in all cancer cell lines at mRNA and protein levels, yet protein expression levels were significantly lower compared to sensory neurons. Treatment of all human carcinoma cell lines with capsaicin didn't lead to overstimulation cytotoxicity in vitro. We assume that the low vanilloid-sensitivity of prostate and breast cancer cells is associated with low expression levels of TRPV1, since ectopic TRPV1 expression rendered them susceptible to the cytotoxic effect of vanilloids evidenced by plateau-type Ca2 + signals, mitochondrial Ca2 + accumulation and Na+- and Ca2 +-dependent membrane disorganization. Moreover, long-term monitoring revealed that merely the ectopic expression of TRPV1 stopped cell proliferation and often induced apoptotic processes via strong activation of caspase-3 activity. Our results indicate that specific targeting of TRPV1 function remains a putative strategy for cancer treatment.