A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Happiness Studies
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Happiness Studies (2019) 20:1995–2010
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0027-7
1 3
REVIEW ARTICLE
Acceptance andCommitment Training (ACT) asaPositive
Psychological Intervention: ASystematic Review andInitial
Meta‑analysis Regarding ACT’s Role inWell‑Being Promotion
Among University Students
AndrewJ.Howell1· Holli‑AnnePassmore2
Published online: 5 September 2018
© Springer Nature B.V. 2018
Abstract
This paper (a) makes the argument for conceiving Acceptance and Commitment Training
(ACT), when applied to the enhancement of well-being, as a positive psychological inter-
vention, and (b) supports this view by reviewing evidence for ACT’s impact on university
student well-being. Searches of the literature identified five randomized experiments that
measured improvements in university student well-being as a function of ACT interven-
tions relative to control conditions. A meta-analysis revealed a significant, small pooled
effect size on well-being (d = 0.29), providing initial evidence of ACT’s role as a positive
psychological intervention among university students. Strengths and limitations of the
extant literature are discussed, as are implications of, and future directions for, this area of
study. It is concluded that research, theory, and application within well-being scholarship
may be facilitated by recognizing ACT’s application to the enhancement of well-being.
Keywords Acceptance and commitment training· Well-being· Positive psychology·
University students
1 Introduction
The last two decades have witnessed the significant and independent advancement of both
positive psychological interventions and Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT).1
Meta-analyses support the impact of positive psychological interventions (such as gratitude
expression and visualizing one’s best possible self) on well-being and related outcomes
* Andrew J. Howell
howella@macewan.ca
1 MacEwan University, Edmonton, Canada
2 University ofBritish Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
1 Levin etal. (2016a), among others, have argued that the word ‘training’ is more applicable than ‘therapy’
when acceptance and commitment interventions are applied to non-clinical samples; given the current focus
on ACT as a positive psychological intervention applied to university students, we adopt this convention
herein.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.