ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Virtually everyone experiences a physical disability at some time in their lives; that is to say that their mobility has been restricted. An infant, en adult with an injury, a parent with a pushchair, an elderly person are all disabled in one way or another. Those who remain healthy and able-bodied throughout their lives are few. The physical environment and public services and public spaces in general should be as barrier-free as possible to fulfil the needs of all people equally. People with a disability have the same rights as other people. People with a disability are not a homogeneous group. They may include the mentally retarded. The most important item for the disabled people is the possibility of circulation; namely accessibility. Inclusive and universal design approaches have to be considered especially for the public spaces and public buildings. In this paper, some main items of circulation in relation with accessibility have been detailed as well as a workshop study outputs which has been hold in Selçuk University, Department of Architecture.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ICONARP
ICONARP
International Journal of Architecture & Planning
Received 15 July 2018; Accepted 17 Aug 2018
Volume 6, Special Issue, pp: 01-14 /Published 31August 2018
DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2018.46E-ISSN: 2147-9380
Research Article
Abstract
Virtually everyone experiences a physical disability at some time in their
lives; that is to say that their mobility has been restricted. An infant, en
adult with an injury, a parent with a pushchair, an elderly person are all
disabled in one way or another. Those who remain healthy and able-
bodied throughout their lives are few. The physical environment and
public services and public spaces in general should be as barrier-free as
possible to fulfil the needs of all people equally. People with a disability
have the same rights as other people. People with a disability are not a
homogeneous group. They may include the mentally retarded. The most
important item for the disabled people is the possibility of circulation;
namely accessibility. Inclusive and universal design approaches have to
be considered especially for the public spaces and public buildings. In
this paper, some main items of circulation in relation with accessibility
have been detailed as well as a workshop study outputs which has been
hold in Selçuk University, Department of Architecture.
Public Space and
Accessibility
Meltem Yılmaz*
Keywords: Iinclusive design, design for the
disabled, universal design, accessibility
*Prof. Dr., Faculty of Fine Arts, Hacettepe
University, Ankara, Turkey. E
E-mail: meltemy@hacettepe.edu.tr
Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/000-0001-7117-
6300
Meltem Yılmaz
INTRODUCTION
All of us want to join the society life as an independent and equal
individual. In order to join the society life we have to access and
use the urban spaces primarily. Everybody has the right to access
and use the urban spaces independently and equally. The
provision of this depends on the accessibility of our urbanized
environments.
Usually the cities are designed according to the young, healthy,
athletic and dynamic people who can climb the 40 centimeters
pedestrian curbs, go up from the stairs and can manage to come
over every kind of obstacles. This is the easiest way of designing
the built environment. The important thing is to realize the space
organizations for the use of everybody. In all societies, besides
young people there are old people, children, pregnant, wheel chair
users, visually despaired, hearing impairment and the other
different positioned people. So, especially the public spaces have
to be planned according to the access and the usage of everybody.
This requirement has become a compulsory in 5378 numbered
Disability Act in Turkey.
PUBLIC SPACE
The acknowledgement of the word “public” is given as “collective,
whole, society, general”; in other words, it means as open to
everybody, open to the whole. The most distinctive quality of
public sphere is its “visible and audible” character or “open” can
be said. The other important quality of public sphere is
“commonness”. Briefly, the sphere that everybody can be “visible
and audible” is “common” (or the areas that have been permitted
for common use) public sphere.
The meaning of the “public” in the concept of public sphere is
explained as “1. All, whole, 2. Population in a country, society,
general”. Public Sphere is explained as “Belong to public, the
place that the public works have been done”. The most important
quality of the public sphere is its openness to the whole
population. In public sphere, diversities join together and at the
same time, it is witnessed to the communal and political events
(Kosova, 2007:46, 51).
Philosophic and sociologic based public sphere is explained as an
open interactive and informative area that individuals can
participate. The democratic public system that depends on the
principles like pluralism, tolerance, clearance that forms the
essence of democracy; provides the participatory, conciliatory
and transparent public spheres (Koca and Yılmaz, 2017, 11).
02
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
We can see the public sphere as a widened area when associated
with the ‘space’ which includes not only the political activities but,
the routines that belongs to daily life. When the space is the point
of issue, both of the two aspects (political activities and daily life)
can be coincide. The urban square that is the stage of political
activities is the space of publicity at the same time which belongs
to everyone, common area that daily routines take place.
In Architectural Terminology generally the usage of public
expression is sometimes used for the buildings as well as
open/urbanized areas. Publicity means openness to everybody.
Either closed space nor open urban area, public space carries the
meaning of permission for general usage (Gürallar, Neşe, 2010).
Public space is conceived as open or closed spaces which
constructed for the usage of every individual without any
discrimination in the society (park, garden, stop etc.) ministration.
Everybody has the responsibility to create solutions for the public
life; we can not ignore the problems that the disabled people come
across in their daily lives in built environment (Özdemir, 2017,
27).
General Directorate of Disabled and Elderly Services that
connected to the Ministry of Family and Social Policy (2011,
Decision 663), as its old name was Prime ministry Head of the
Disability Administration defined accessibility as: “to access
every right and services in all of the live areas and to benefit from
those”. In this direction, all of the people live in the cities have the
right to benefit equally from the public spaces especially. In other
words, everybody has the right to benefit from the public spaces
equally and independently. Not for the society but with the
society, the design for the access and usage together with the
qualified interaction on physical space for whole citizens can be
provided. Public space has great contributions on the formation
and progress of public sphere. Public spaces are the milieus that
citizens meet, come across, socialize, do activities and can be
exemplified as areas like streets, avenues, parks and squares.
ACCESSIBILITY
The most important item for the disabled people is the possibility
of circulation; namely accessibility. American Disabilities Act
(ADA) is federal legislation passed in 1990 that prohibits
discrimination against people with disabilities
(Investopedia.com) defines the accessibility as: “Accessible road,
is the road that from a node in the interior of a building to the
public space does not include any obstacle and provides
continuity”. Accessibility must be the most essential feature of the
human centred design in built environment. Everybody must use
03
2
Meltem Yılmaz
the built environment independently and equally. Every country
must have the goal of providing the usage of built environment in
safe and beneficially including the disabled people.
The objective of each country should be the provision of the
environments which are convenient, safe and enjoyable to use by
everyone, including people with disabilities. City environments
are particularly hostile to people with disabilities, mainly since
access to most places is very difficult or almost impossible. The
UN Standard Rules on Accessibility make the following
recommendations regarding access to the physical environment
(Arvanitis, 2004: 20-21):
- States should initiate measures to remove the obstacles to
participation in the physical environment. Such measures
should develop standards and guidelines and consider
enacting legislation to ensure accessibility to various areas in
society, including housing, buildings, public transport services
and other means of transportation, streets and other outdoor
environments.
- States should ensure that architects, construction engineers
and others who are professionally involved in the design and
construction of the physical environment have access to
adequate information on disability policy and measures to
achieve accessibility.
- Accessibility requirements should be included in the design
and construction of the physical environment from the
beginning of the design process.
- Organizations of persons with disabilities should be consulted
when standards and norms for accessibility are being
developed. They should also be involved locally from the initial
planning stage when public construction projects are being
designed, thus ensuring maximum accessibility.
Like everybody, the disabled people want to be safe when they go
out from their homes. To move independently without coming
across any obstacles on the streets and roads; to reach the
building entrances easily and to use the entrance exit door that
everyone uses; to access the city squares and service areas at the
same way are the main demands of disabled people (Koca, Yılmaz,
2017: 12).
According to this approach which named as ‘universal design’,
discrimination has to be prevented, rightly and egalitarian
approach has to be reflected into the space and products. The
concept of universal design contributes us to understand more
better the people that do not resemble to us whom we see as the
“others”; contributes us to put ourselves instead of them who are
less lucky from us or seems as less powered (elderly people,
04
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
physically or mentally retarded people, children and the like)
from us and behave attentional. This kind of approach will serve
us to produce “inclusive” design and to take the required
precautions by accepting that they have the right to use the built
environment at least like us (İmamoğlu, 2013:67).
CIRCULATION
Pedestrian Roads: Accessible road does not include any elevation
difference, stair, footstep or escalator (Figure 1). In open public
areas like avenues, streets, crossings, etc. pedestrian roads have
to be designed taking into consideration all of the users. Vehicle,
pedestrian and bicycle roads can be separated from each other
without using any elevation difference, only by using different
materials and colors.
On the pedestrian roads there must not be any obstacles like
vehicle barriers or rising bollards. The trees, shrubs or the lighting
units like elements which can hit or scratch faces should be placed
30 centimeters away from the pedestrian roads.
For the visually impaired people guided roads have to be applied
on the pedestrian roads. If there does not any guiding road on the
pedestrian ways the visually impaired people can follow the
existing borders. In order to follow the borders smoothly all of the
equipment on the roads have to be elevated 10 centimeters higher
from the ground level.
The elevation difference in between the pedestrian way and the
vehicle way must be maximum 15 centimeters. For the visually
impaired people on the pedestrian ways, the guiding roads at least
50 centimeters away from the vehicle road have to be placed. The
guiding roads have to be placed on a pure and acceptable route
and have to be away from the manhole and drainage canals. For
the usage of all disabled people, the material of guiding roads have
to be on the same level with the ground pavement (Koca, Yılmaz,
2017:36-38).
Figure 1. An interior pedestrian
road; Oslo University (Yılmaz,
2017).
05
Meltem Yılmaz
Ramps: The slope of all of the ramps have to be 5 % if we think the
independent usage of wheel chair user. The ramps that have a
slope up to 8 % can be used by the wheel chair user with the help
of others (Figure 2).
The clean width of the ramps has to be minimum 91.5 centimeters.
At the starting and finishing parts of the ramps there must be an
empty space left minimum 152.5cm x 152.5 cm. for the movement
of the wheel chair user. The distance that the wheel chair user can
go straight is 9 meters. In the ramps that longer than 9 meters,
platforms have to be placed minimum in 152 .5 centimeters long.
In the below figures, in Figure 3a you see only the stairs to reach
the upper level which is not accessible for a wheel chair user. On
the upper level there is the students’ cafeteria of Hacettepe
University Beytepe Campus and the wheel chair user student
cannot access there. Afterwards a ramp with 5 % sloped with
platforms constructed and it became accessible for everyone
(Figure 3b).
Stairs: The width of the stair has to be minimum 91.5 centimeters
which is the minimum dimension for the passage of wheel chair
user. The common stair and platform widths in housing units have
to be minimum 120 centimeters, in public buildings the
dimensions have to be minimum 150 centimeters. For the
comfortable usage of everyone after 8 10 footstep a platform has
to be placed in staircases.
At the starting, finishing and platforms sensible stimulating
surfaces minimum 60 centimeters in width have to be applied. In
order to ease the visibility and the prevention of slippery, the
Figure 3a. Stairs which are not
accesible
Figure 3b. A ramp with platforms
(%5 slope) constructed for
accessibility of everyone
Figure 2. The ramp slopes (Koca,
Yılmaz, 2017:43).
06
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
color of the step tips has to be different from the main color of the
stair and has to be marked with a perceptible color.
The stair step width has to be minimum 28 centimeters, the height
of the step has to be maximum 16 centimeters for the disabled
people; for the other situations it can be maximum 18 centimeters.
The formula for counting the relationship of the dimensions of the
risers and steps:
2 x Riser Height + Step Width = 60 64 cm
For the usage of disabled people open or transparent risers for the
stairs do not permitted. The finishing of the risers can be rounded,
flat or angel.
Balustrades: Balustrades, parapets and holders have to be placed
to the places where people in need of them like passage ways,
stairs and ramps. Balustrades have to be placed 30 centimeters
away from the starting and ending points of the stairs and ramps
and have to continue all along the stairs. In ramps instead of
balustrades protective borders at least 5 centimeters high can be
used. The ramps or stairs which is wider than 180 centimeters
need balustrades to be replaced in the middle. The height of the
balustrades, parapets and holders from the ground level have to
be 90 centimeters for adults and 70 centimeters for children
(Figure 4). Visually impaired people can do edge following in the
places where there are balustrades. So, in balustrades and holders
a bordure that at least 10 centimeters higher from the ground
have to be placed (Koca, Yılmaz, 2017: 45-47).
The stair or ramp balustrades can stand by themselves or can be
fixed to the wall. If they fixed to the wall then the distance between
the parapet and the wall have to be at least 4 centimeters. The
Figure 4. Balustrades and Parapets
(Koca, Yılmaz, 2017: 47).
07
Meltem Yılmaz
diameters of the parapets have to be at least 4 centimeters and
have to provide the possibility to be hold in balance.
Entrances and Exits: In the buildings main entrances equal right,
fair usage principles have to be considered for all the users. The
entrances for the disabled people have to be designed accordingly.
For the passage ways, ramps, stairs, entrance doors, information
and warning boards required dimensions have to be used. In front
of the entrances space for the movement of wheel chair user has
to be provided. If there is carpet on the ground floor, the material
has to be fixed on the ground securely. The carpet tips have to be
fixed on to the ground and the edges have to be striped. The hair
or the texture of the materials thickness must not be more than 13
mm. (Figure 5) (Koca and Yılmaz, 2017: 52-53).
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicle Approach: In the mass transportation or private car use, all
of the users’ approach to the vehicle, get on and out of the car
actions of them needs an adequate space which is very important.
For the disabled people the reserved space for them to see the
vehicle, approach, to get on and out of the car has to be cleared
from all of the obstacles. In built environments, different kind of
applications have to be considered for the physical, visual and
audial impaired individuals. For example, for a wheel chair user
efficient area has to be provided; for a visually impaired individual
stimulating surfaces on the ground and audial stimuli systems are
needed; for people who see less, bright colors or phosphoric
strings can be applied; for the audial impaired people visual
stimulating systems can be applied.
Figure 5. Entrances and Exits
Hacettepe University Beytepe
Campus (Koca, Yılmaz, 2017: 53).
08
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
In between the pedestrian way and road, ramps should be
constructed for the crossing. At the transition areas and at the
other used ramps on the roads have to have maximum 5 % slope.
Vehicle Parking Areas: Vehicle parking areas have to be placed
closer to the entrance and open to an accessible route. The
dimensions of the disabled vehicle parking side by side with an
angle are minimum 250cm x 250cm. Thinking the movement of
the wheel chair the distance left in between the two parking areas
for the transition corridors has to be minimum 150 cm in width.
In front of the vehicle, minimum 91.5 cm in width transition road
has to be left (Figure 6) (Koca and Yılmaz, 2017: 29-30).
In the transition points from parking areas to pedestrian roads,
there must not be any level difference preventing the crossing. If
the level difference is inevitable then minimum 91.5 cm widened
ramps have to be constructed. If the rams are sloped in one
direction than the slope must be 5%, if sloped in three directions
than the slope of the sides have to be 10 %. Ramps can be located
on transition area or on pedestrian road.
The materials of the roads in between the buildings and the
vehicle park have to be non-slippery and matte taking into
consideration the weather conditions.
Stops: Stops have to be protective from the weather conditions
depending on the existing region. Inside the stops there must be
seating places, holding bars have to be fixed in needed sections
and an empty space must be left for the parking of a wheel chair.
Figure 6. Vehicle Parking Area
(Koca, Yılmaz, 2017: 30).
09
Meltem Yılmaz
At the stops, audible and written (the writings may be embossed)
information and warnings related to the mass transportation
service has to be found. These writings and warnings have to be
in contrast color with the background of the panels which the
corners are rounded (Figure 7). Embossed information panels
have to be placed in between 110cm 130cm higher from the
ground level (Koca and Yılmaz, 2017: 32-33).
In front of the stops and at the back of the stops minimum 100 cm
has to be left for the transfer. If there are transparent surfaces in
the stops, bright, colored and reflective strings higher 150 cm
from the ground level, 14 -16 cm widened have to be applied on
those transparent surfaces (Figure 8) (Koca, Yılmaz, 2017: 33).
When mass transportation vehicles approached to the stop,
a direct transfer has to be provided without any level
difference (Figure 9).
Figure 7. Liverpool Bus Stops
(Yılmaz, 2010).
Figure 8. The bus stops (Koca,
Yılmaz 2017:33).
10
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
WORKSHOP ON UNIVERSAL DESIGN
In Selçuk University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of
Architecture, III International Universal Design Panel and
Workshop hold on 3rd - 4th of May in Konya; The title was “to
Think with Universal design”. Related with the concept of
‘universal design’ 9 workshops organized with different
subjects. One of them was the universal design of Selçuk
university, faculty of architecture; 13 students attended to
the workshop coming from different universities in Turkey.
During the workshop, together with the participant students
only the exterior spaces examined for the disabled people.
After determining the problems and obstacles of the exterior
spaces for the disabled, solutions discussed for an accessible
design and proposals had drawn on a plan (Figure 10a) and
a visual documentation (Figure 10b) also provided with the
suggested designs.
Figure 9. Bus ramp detail from USA
(Yılmaz 2017).
11
Meltem Yılmaz
The aim of the workshop is to show the students to examine
the existing built environment with a thinking eye and
encourage them to consider an inclusive design approach for
all. Initially they started to share the disabled family or
relative members, and with their own experiences they tried
to determine the obstacles and deficiencies in the existing
built environment. After the determination, they tried to
apply universal design principles for all in their drawings
including not only physically disabled people but mental
disorders also.
CONCLUSION
The environment belongs to all. It is a fundamental human
right. Although major stakeholders in society, people with a
disability are often excluded from this right. We cannot
envisage a future of hope without access to meaningful
citizenship for all. A new vision for humanity, one based on
accessibility and social justice, is a prerequisite for a better
quality of life.
In every society there are individuals who owns different
properties and different ages. All the individuals have the
Figure 10a. The plan of Universal
design for Selçuk university faculty
of architecture (Yılmaz, 2018).
Figure 10b. A visual documentation
of the suggested design proposal
(Yılmaz, 2018).
12
Public Space and Accessibility
ICONARP - Volume 6, Special Issue / Published: August 2018
right to access the public space and use it. The people with
different disabilities in the society have to be able to use the
built environment and public space in an independent and
equal way. At that point, the urban planners, architects, local
governments have to do their responsibilities. Cities and the
buildings have to be designed and applied according to the
principles of universal design. Local governments have to be
precise for the application of universal design principles to
the building designs and public space designs and has to do
the required inspections.
Generally, in public spaces and buildings, the required
precautions are taken according to the physically disabled
people like wheel chair users, visually or audible impaired
individuals and the like; but, there are space solutions also
for mentally and cognitively disordered people. In Turkey,
some built environment precautions are taken only for the
physically impaired people. However, some space solutions
have to be searched and provided for the people who have
autism, dementia or the other similar disabilities. In order to
realize this, the society have to accept the behaviours that
include disabled people and contribute to the formation of a
fair built environment for all.
REFERENCES
Arvanitis, A. V. (2004) People with a Disability in Modern
Society, Published by Biopolitics International
Organization, ISBN 960-7508-20-3, Athens.
Gürallar, Neşe (2009) Kamusal Alan, Mimarlık 350 Dergisi,
Kasım – Aralık.
İmamoğlu, V. (2013) Evrensel Tasarıma Bir Yaklaşım: ODTÜ
Mimarlık Fakültesi Deneyimi, “Herkes İçin Tasarım”
Müfredatı Geliştirme Çalıştayı, Derleyenler, A.Özkul, C.
Girgin, O. Tutal, M. Anay, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yay.,
Eskişehir.
Koca, D. ve Yılmaz, M. (2017) Engelliler İçin Mekan
Düzenlemelerinde Kapsayıcı Tasarım, YÖK yayını,
Ankara.
Kosova, E. (2007) Kamusal Alan ve Güncel Sanat, Proje Kitabı,
İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
Özdemir, A. (2017) Engelsiz Yaşama Doğru, ODTÜ’lüler
Bülteni, ODTÜ Mezunlar Derneği Yayını, Şubat, sa
267, Ankara.
13
Meltem Yılmaz
www. Investopedia.com access date June, 2018.
Resume
Meltem Yılmaz was born in Canada, on April 28, 1965. She
received the Diploma in Architecture from Middle East
Technical University and the Master’s degree from Hacettepe
University. Her Ph.D. degree is from Ankara University. She is
currently working in Hacettepe University as a professor in
Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design.
Her research interests include sustainable design, universal
design, design for disabled people and historical
environments.
14
... Utilizing public areas and services without restrictions or hurdles (Yılmaz, 2018). Access to the public realm is thereby limited for women, girls, and people of sexual and gender minorities due to the ensuing division of public and private areas. ...
... Similarly, mobility plays a critical role, dictating the ease with which people and goods move within and around public spaces. Efficient mobility solutions such as well-planned roads, pathways, and public transit options help create more user-friendly urban environments, especially for women who rely on public transport more frequently (Yılmaz, 2018). Another important physical aspect is land use, which governs how different areas within a city are designated for various purposes. ...
Article
Full-text available
As urbanization accelerates globally, creating inclusive public spaces that accommodate women's rights and freedoms becomes increasingly vital. This study critically assesses the impact of urban environments on women in public spaces within the Indian context, focusing on Marine Drive in Kochi, Kerala. Employing field investigations, mapping, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses—including surveys of 100 women—the research explores elements affecting women's quality of life in urban settings. Key factors identified include safety concerns, inadequate accessibility, and insufficient infrastructure that hinder women's equitable participation in public spaces. Literature reviews and case studies highlighted parameters influencing women's experiences, such as land use, mobility, visibility, and safety. A theoretical framework addressing design, physical, environmental, cultural, and economic aspects was developed to create gender-sensitive urban spaces. Applying this framework to the design element of land led to specific guidelines enhancing accessibility, mobility, and permeability, which are crucial for women's comfort and security. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of women's interactions with urban environments and provide a foundation for urban planners and policymakers to develop women-friendly public spaces, thereby promoting inclusivity and enhancing the overall urban experience.
... In summary, areas where everyone can be 'visible and audible' are considered 'common.' Therefore, areas open to shared use are evaluated as public spaces (Yılmaz, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Coastal areas are privileged spaces within the city, possessing high potential due to the presence of water. Defining coasts as areas under public access where everyone can equally and freely benefit underscores the significance of the concepts of publicness and accessibility. Urban design practices in coastal areas aim to enhance public use and strengthen the coast-city relationship through accessibility approaches. This study identifies the factors that determine publicness and accessibility through a literature review and examines these factors in the context of the redesigned Konyaaltı urban coastal area. On-site observations and analyses were conducted to assess the current situation. The findings suggest that improving accessibility and publicness in coastal areas requires the development of urban and architectural approaches in the legal framework that extend beyond defined boundaries to include coastal interaction zones. Ensuring accessibility for everyone, particularly along coastlines, is among the significant findings derived from this study for the effective and universal use of coastal areas. Regulations based on publicness and accessibility will support the physical and social sustainability of the coast. Well-designed public spaces will positively impact the quality of life, enhance the coastal city's image, and contribute to the city's identity.
... This issue arose from the absence of clearly defined areas for accessible parking, as the parking lots were not properly marked. This highlighted a missed opportunity to enhance inclusion, as dedicated parking spaces near building entrances can significantly aid individuals with limited mobility [57,58]. It was also observed that all case studies lacked handrails with interval railing guides on both sides of vertical circulation systems, such as ramps and stairs. ...
... Therefore, current research on accessibility predominantly focuses on the material aspects of environmental construction. This includes studies on the systematic establishment of spatial hierarchies for accessible transportation networks [16,17], optimization research on the spatial configuration of accessibility facilities in public space [18][19][20], and quantitative investigations into the color and scale of accessibility signage [21,22]. The relevant research in this section is limited to quantitative studies on barrier-free built environments, which inherently has limitations. ...
Article
Full-text available
China faces a significant population of individuals with disabilities, and the aging demographic exacerbates this challenge. There is an urgent need for accessible environments for vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities, the elderly, and pregnant women. Consequently, this study aimed to explore the factors influencing satisfaction with accessible travel in old communities in Nanchang City. Adopting a perspective encompassing vulnerabilities across all age groups, we employed interviews, on-site surveys, questionnaires, and literature reviews to construct a model of satisfaction with accessible travel. This model comprises five evaluation dimensions: pedestrian pathways, public spaces, signage guidance, social support, and software provision, encompassing twenty-seven influencing factors. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to validate the model. The research findings indicated that social support (0.697), pedestrian pathways (0.480), and public spaces (0.291) exerted a significant overall effect on satisfaction within the model, whereas the influence of software provision (0.225) and signage guidance (0.249) was comparatively smaller. Vulnerable groups within the community prioritized operational maintenance (0.818) and cultural advocacy (0.791) within social support. They also emphasized aspects of pedestrian pathways such as elevation treatment (0.809) and pavement design (0.803), as well as rest facilities (0.804) and service facilities (0.790) within public spaces. Finally, based on the weighted ranking of factors among latent variables, we propose corresponding optimization strategies and development proposals. This paper contributes to providing theoretical, practical, and technical support for the design of community accessibility that caters to socially vulnerable groups across “universal and all-ages” groups. It plays a proactive role in enhancing the quality of life for these vulnerable groups and promoting the improvement of accessibility environments in old communities.
... However, these entrances are less common in railway stations due to the complexity of their shape, which makes construction difficult and often not cost-effective. In contemporary urban architecture, various considerations, including accessibility for disabled individuals [62] and wheelchair users, evacuation plans [63], and smoking areas [64,65] are considered alongside architectural styles. ...
Article
Full-text available
An environmentally conscious architectural design of a railway station can have a substantial influence on government spending. Nevertheless, an extensive collection of guidelines for using sustainable design principles in the construction of a railway station can provide several advantages. The goal is to review design visions for railway stations in Thailand, as reflected in student theses and government proposals, from 1983 to 2022 for sustainable design aspects in tropical climates. We perform an analysis of architectural design aspects including service areas, shape, entrances, roofing, style, and development in order to uncover design trends and possible areas that may be enhanced. Station designs are mostly characterized by curved and gable roofs, with 3D curved buildings being the next most common feature. High speed rail (HSR) stations stress local cultural elements in their major entrances while also improving passenger flow. Public buildings frequently employ curved or gabled porticos to achieve a majestic look. Although university theses place a high importance on conceptual design and functionality, it is essential to also consider cost-effectiveness. Key design considerations for future railway stations are transparency, connection, efficient mobility, and cost-time efficiency. The research uncovers deficiencies in user-centered design for thermal comfort and inclusiveness (design-for-all) in Thailand's tropical environment. Addressing these aspects is critical for future sustainable railway station design evaluations.
... However, these entrances are less common in railway stations due to the complexity of their shape, which makes construction difficult and often not cost-effective. In contemporary urban architecture, various considerations, including accessibility for disabled individuals (Yılmaz 2018) and wheelchair users, evacuation plans (Hostikka et al. 2007), and smoking areas (Navas-Acien et al. 2016;Sureda et al. 2012), are considered alongside architectural styles. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The increasing demand for transporting people and goods, rail system is needed for enhancement. An architectural design of train station can significantly impact investment from any government. However, a proper guideline for designing the train station in tropical climate is not publicized. This review examine railway station design through an analysis of student design theses in Thailand, from 1983 to 2022. Furthermore, the building analyses on architectural design theory were done in terms of service area, form, entrance structure, roof structure, style, and design development. The analysis reveals curved and gable roofs are most frequent, followed by 3D curved roofs. HSR stations' main entrances are designed to represent local culture and save walking distance. Curved and gabled porticos provide the most extravagant main entryway, a feeling of grandeur and beauty. A public building's overlapping portico or curving gabled portico lends majesty and refinement to its façade. Architects and designers strive to make buildings more attractive and practical. Besides, university-designed stations prioritize conceptual design and functional space over cost. Finally, railway station design should prioritize transparency, connectivity, movement, and cost- and time-efficiency. Research gaps are identified, such as designing user-friendly for thermal comfort and design-for-all the railway station in tropical climate, are critical for future evaluation.
Article
Full-text available
This study focuses on the analysis of lighting in night conditions to explain what lighting in parks should look like and how parks should be lit from the point of view of people’s perceptions. It addresses the impact of the lighting configuration of urban parks on preference, safety, mystery, legibility, and contact with the environment. The feelings of wheelchair users and able-bodied people were measured. The respondents assessed park landscapes presented in visualisations that varied in terms of lighting features and spatial contexts. This research showed, inter alios, that the participants rated evenly lit spaces more highly than those featuring spot lighting. In unevenly lit spaces, the lighting of the surroundings turned out to be crucial import for able-bodied people, while for the disabled respondents, a combination of lighting of the surroundings and of paths was significant. For evenly lit spaces, path lighting is less important for disabled people than for those without disabilities. These insights can help researchers to look at lighting solutions in a more human-centered way and take into account the environment in which they are used. This allows the design of night lighting in parks to be socially sustainable and promotes access to urban green spaces for all citizens. The study emphasises that the provision of sustainable lighting in parks should take into account different social groups, making light a common good.
Chapter
Covid-19 restrictions have upended normal life flow, completely changed education systems, affected our mental health and social relationships. Educational institutions all around the world had to switch to remote and hybrid learning; many students abandoned their learning environments and had to learn from home. As expected, the crisis showed that distance learning isn’t for everyone, children need guidance from a teacher and shared activities with classmates, for a fruitful learning process. As the world is slowly adapting to life in a pandemic, policymakers and educators in North Macedonia, were challenged to reopen schools or offer an appropriate online learning model. Beyond much discussion about where learning will take place, another question appeared: How to improve and reinvent schools to fulfill the needs of all students now and in the future? Besides causing difficulties, the global health pandemic delivered a clear picture of what works and what doesn’t for pupils. It opened our eyes to existing inequalities and all challenges that need to be addressed. As new approaches to designing learning environments are required, we cannot return to the world as it was before. School designs with a renewed focus on the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of children constructed over the pillars of access, equity, and inclusion, are the future of a reformed teaching system. The built environment should ensure the safety of students, educators and staff, and act to the improvement of education and children’s well-being in a (post) pandemic world. It is imperative that schools present a positive inclusive environment where children can explore and learn while feeling safe, equal and accepted. In the process of providing guidelines and suggestions for redesign or reuse of educational facilities, first and foremost one must begin with the evaluation of existing school infrastructure. Based on building codes and regulations, direct observation of 12 schools in Macedonia, and analysis of disabled user’s needs, this research focuses on rethinking how buildings are designed, how architecture can reshape spaces and user experience, ending up with design guidelines and suggestions about how the classroom of the future should look like.
Book
Full-text available
Sunuş Toplum, karşılıklı görevleri ve örgütlenme bağları bulunan bireylerden oluşan ve belli değer ve davranış örüntülerini paylaşan; belli coğrafi bir uzamda ve ortak bir kültür içinde temel amaç ve çıkarlar çevresinde birleşmiş olarak yaşayan insanlar kümesi olarak tanımlanmaktadır (Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Türkçebilim Terimleri Sözlüğü, 2011). Özer Ozankaya da benzer bir şekilde toplumu, yaşamlarını sürdürmek birçok temel çıkarlarını gerçekleştirmek için işbirliği yapan, aynı toprak parçası üzerinde birlikte yaşayan ve ortak bir ekini olan insan kümesi olarak tanımlamıştır (Özer Ozankaya, Toplumbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü, 1980 ). Toplumu oluşturan bu insanlar kümesi, değişik yaşlarda farklı sağlık durumları ve engelleri olan, özel gereksinimlere ihtiyaç duyan kişilerden oluşmaktadır. Herkesin eşit ve adil yaşama hakkı olduğu dikkate alınırsa, yapısal çevre, eğitim ve sağlık gibi temel hizmetlerden eşit olarak yararlanma gerekliliği daha iyi anlaşılır. Ne var ki, özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde, yaşlılar, engelliler ve çocuklar gibi toplumun zayıf kesimini oluşturanlar için temel gereksinimlerini karşılama haklarını elde etmek kolay olmamaktadır. Genellikle yapısal çevre ve diğer temel gereksinimlere erişim sağlıklı ve genç insanlara göre düzenlenmiştir. Halbuki, Türkiye nüfusunun % 12,29 u engellidir. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 2016 yılı nüfusu 78,741,053 kişidir. Toplam nüfusa oranla engelli sayısı 9,677,276 kişidir. Bir başka deyişle, 10 milyona yakın engelli vatandaşımız bulunmaktadır. Temel gereksinimlerden biri olan eğitim hakkını ele alacak olursak; 1982 tarihli Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası’nın 42. Maddesinde: “ Kimse, eğitim, öğrenim hakkından yoksun bırakılamaz. Devlet, durumları sebebiyle özel eğitime ihtiyacı olanları topluma yararlı kılacak tedbirleri alır” denmektedir. 1739 Sayılı Türk Milli Eğitim Temel Kanununun7. Maddesi; temel eğitim görmek her Türk vatandaşının hakkı olduğunu, 8. Maddesi eğitimde kadın erkek herkese fırsat eşitliğinin sağlanacağını, özel eğitime ve korunmaya muhtaç çocukları yetiştirmek için özel tedbirlerin alınacağını; 2916 sayılı Özel Eğitime Muhtaç Çocuklar Kanununun 4. Maddesi; özel eğitimin genel eğitimin ayrılmaz bir parçası olduğunu, özel eğitim hizmetlerini çocuğun özür ve özellikleri dikkate alınarak mümkün olduğu kadar yakınına götürülecek biçimde planlandığını, durumları ve özellikleri uygun olan özürlü çocukların normal akranları arasında eğitim görmeleri için gerekli tedbirlerin alınması; resmi, özel ilköğretim okullarının kendi çevrelerindeki özel eğitim gerektiren çocuklar için özel eğitim hizmetleri sağlamakla yükümlü olduklarını hükme bağlamış bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, 1982 tarihli Anayasa’nın sağlık hakkı ile ilgili 56. Maddesi de, Devlete herkesin beden ve ruh sağlığı içinde yaşatılması görevini yüklemektedir. Kuşkusuz, bu engelliler için de Devlete önemli bir görev düştüğü anlamına gelmektedir. Maalesef ülkemizde gözlemlenen uygulama, engelli çocukların yasal hakları olan eğitimi alabilmeleri için okullarda gerekli altyapının oluşturulmadığı yönündedir. Engelli öğrenciler, okul yönetimi, öğretmenler ve veliler tarafından endişeyle karşılanmakta ve destek olunması gerekirken genellikle dışlayıcı bir tavır ile yüzleşmektedirler. Ülkemizde engelli bir öğrencinin gerekli eğitimi alabilmesi, velisinin yukarıda genel olarak belirtilen yasa ve yönetmelikleri çalıştırma çabasına bağlıdır. Yetenek sınavı ile öğrenci alan ortaöğretim kurumları, 01.07.2015 tarihinde Resmi Gazete’de yayımlanan yönetmelik değişikliği ile engelli öğrencilere kendi içlerinde değerlendirilme hakkını tanımıştır. Buna göre: Beceri, yetenek sınavıyla öğrenci alan okullara yerleştirilecek öğrenciler ile ilgili olarak okul müdürlüklerince oluşturulan komisyon tarafından kendi aralarında beceri, yetenek sınavına alınacak ve başarılı olanların kayıtları yapılacak denmektedir. Bu uygulama, özel yetenekleri olan engelli öğrencilere, yetenekleri doğrultusunda eğitim görebilme hakkı tanımaktadır. 10. Engelsiz Üniversiteler Çalıştayı Sonuç Bildirgesi’nde de benzer bir uygulamanın Yüksek Öğretim Kurumlarında da uygulanması gerektiği ifade edilmiştir. Özel yetenek sınavı ile öğrenci alınan yüksek öğretim kurumlarının giriş sınavlarında engelli öğrencilerin kendi aralarında değerlendirilmesi gereği sıkça talep edilmektedir. Ülkemiz koşullarında engelli bir bireyin üniversitede eğitim görebilme aşamasına kadar gelebilmesi, elbette büyük bir başarı olup özel yetenekleri olan engelli öğrencilerin, orta öğretimde olduğu gibi yüksek öğretime girişteki özel yetenek sınavlarında da kendi aralarında değerlendirilmesi ve ilgili programlarda eğitim görebilme olanaklarının artırılması konusunda mevzuat düzenlemesi yapılması, bir gereklilik olarak ifade edilebilir. Elinizdeki kitap, yapısal çevredeki plan çalışmalarının herkesi kapsayacak şekilde tasarlanmasına rehberlik etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Kapsayıcı tasarım kavramı kentsel mekanda incelenmiştir. Planlamaya bütüncül yaklaşmak en ideal olanıdır. Özellikle kamusal mekanlar herkesin bu alanlardan yararlanma hakları dikkate alınacak şekilde planlanmalı ve tasarlanmalıdır. Seviye farkı olmayan, hemzemin çözümlemeler, herkesin erişilebilirliğini artıran, en fazla tercih edilmesi gereken uygulamalardır. Gerekli olduğu durumlarda herkesin rahat hareket edebilmesini sağlamaya yönelik teknik ve kavramsal yaklaşımlar bu çalışmada ele alınmıştır. Kitapta, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Beytepe Yerleşkesi’nde engelli öğrencilerimizin yaşam kalitesini yükseltecek ve erişilebilirliklerini artıracak plan çalışmalarına ve uygulama örneklerine yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışmalar, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi İç Mimarlık ve Çevre Tasarımı Bölümü yüksek lisans öğrencileri ile birlikte, sorun tespit etme, öneri geliştirme ve çözüm aşamalarında üniversitemiz engelli öğrencilerinin destekleri ile yapılmıştır. Bu yayını oluşturmadaki amacımız, yapısal kamusal mekanların sadece genç, sağlıklı ve yetişkin bireylere göre değil ‘Herkes’ için tasarlanması gerektiğine yönelik farkındalık oluşturmak, dışlayıcı değil kapsayıcı yaklaşımlar geliştirilmesini desteklemek ve daha kapsamlı araştırmalar yapılmasına yönelik teşvik edici olmaktır. Yayının gerçekleşmesine önayak olan YÖK Engelli Öğrenci Komisyonu’na, Hacettepe Üniversitesi yönetimine, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi öğretim elemanları ve öğrencilerine, bizden desteklerini esirgemeyen engelli öğrencilerimize teşekkürlerimizi sunarız. Prof Dr Meltem Yılmaz Hacettepe Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi İç Mimarlık ve Çevre Tasarımı Bölümü
People with a Disability in Modern Society
  • A V Arvanitis
Arvanitis, A. V. (2004) People with a Disability in Modern Society, Published by Biopolitics International Organization, ISBN 960-7508-20-3, Athens.
Kamusal Alan, Mimarlık 350 Dergisi
  • Neşe Gürallar
Gürallar, Neşe (2009) Kamusal Alan, Mimarlık 350 Dergisi, Kasım -Aralık.
Evrensel Tasarıma Bir Yaklaşım: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Deneyimi
  • V İmamoğlu
İmamoğlu, V. (2013) Evrensel Tasarıma Bir Yaklaşım: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Deneyimi, "Herkes İçin Tasarım" Müfredatı Geliştirme Çalıştayı, Derleyenler, A.Özkul, C. Girgin, O. Tutal, M. Anay, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yay., Eskişehir.
Kamusal Alan ve Güncel Sanat
  • E Kosova
Kosova, E. (2007) Kamusal Alan ve Güncel Sanat, Proje Kitabı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
Engelsiz Yaşama Doğru, ODTÜ'lüler Bülteni
  • A Özdemir
Özdemir, A. (2017) Engelsiz Yaşama Doğru, ODTÜ'lüler Bülteni, ODTÜ Mezunlar Derneği Yayını, Şubat, sayı 267, Ankara.