ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The purpose of the present research is presenting the relationships between self-efficacy, fear of success and life satisfaction; and determining the predictive power fear of success and self-efficacy on life satisfaction. For this purpose, self-efficacy, fear of achievement and life satisfaction scales were implemented on 625 individuals. In the analysis of the data, t-test and regression analysis were utilized. According to the findings of the research, there is a negative correlation between self-efficacy and fear of achievement. There is a relationship between all subscales of self-efficacy and fear of success. In particular, the "starting behavior" and "maintaining behavior" subscales are the strongest predictors of fear of success. Similarly, there is a positive correlation between self-efficacy and life satisfaction; and a significant negative correlation between fear of success and life satisfaction. Taken that self-efficacy is influenced by fear of success and fear of success and self-efficacy has effects on life satisfaction into consideration; any kind of psychological help for reducing the fear of success will increase self-efficacy. Similarly, any effort to improve self-efficacy will reduce fear of success. The increase in self-efficacy perceived positively and the decrease in fear of success will increase the individual's life satisfaction.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(6): 1278-1285, 2018 http://www.hrpub.org
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060619
Fear of Success and Life Satisfaction
in terms of Self-efficacy
Hasan Yılmaz
Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature, Kyrgyzstan Turkey Manas University, Kyrgyzstan
Copyright©2018 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License
Abstract The purpose of the present research is
presenting the relationships between self-efficacy, fear of
success and life satisfaction; and determining the
predictive power fear of success and self-efficacy on life
satisfaction. For this purpose, self-efficacy, fear of
achievement and life satisfaction scales were implemented
on 625 individuals. In the analysis of the data, t-test and
regression analysis were utilized. According to the findings
of the research, there is a negative correlation between
self-efficacy and fear of achievement. There is a
relationship between all subscales of self-efficacy and fear
of success. In particular, the "starting behavior" and
"maintaining behavior" subscales are the strongest
predictors of fear of success. Similarly, there is a positive
correlation between self-efficacy and life satisfaction; and
a significant negative correlation between fear of success
and life satisfaction. Taken that self-efficacy is influenced
by fear of success and fear of success and self-efficacy has
effects on life satisfaction into consideration; any kind of
psychological help for reducing the fear of success will
increase self-efficacy. Similarly, any effort to improve
self-efficacy will reduce fear of success. The increase in
self-efficacy perceived positively and the decrease in fear
of success will increase the individual's life satisfaction.
Keywords Fear of Success, Life Satisfaction and
Self-efficacy
1. Introduction
Self-efficacy is related with a strong sense of personal
efficacy, better health, higher success and creativity, and
better social integration. Self-efficacy is about whether an
action is to be started and how much effort will be paid and
how much struggle will put against obstacles and failures.
In other words, self-efficacy is not a concept related to our
abilities and technical skills, but it is a concept related to
the perception whether we can reach our goals. According
to Bandura [1] self-efficacy makes a difference in the way
people think, feel and behave. Low self-efficacy is
associated with depression, anxiety, and despair.
Individuals with lower self-efficacy also have lower
self-esteem and they have pessimistic thoughts about their
achievements and personal growth. People with high self-
efficacy are willing and creative in performing more
challenging tasks. Higher self-efficacy also enables to
choose challenging goals, explore the environment and
take advantage of environmental conditions. Self-efficacy
is not a skill; it is the belief on what the individuals can do
in accordance with their abilities. Self-efficacy is much
more than the intention of the individual to achieve an aim,
since it is the sum of beliefs about starting, maintaining,
concluding, and even more importantly, struggling with the
obstacles that will face in this process. In short,
self-efficacy belief is an individual’s belief that they can
perform the behavior that produces the result [2].
The fear of success can be regarded as the counter
concept of self-efficacy. It can be defined as the behaviors
of avoiding success resulting from the anxieties of that
those who overwork are negatively evaluated, the works of
very successful individuals are sabotaged by others, and so
resulting in the formation of low goals, the tendency
towards easy tasks, the diminution of attainment with the
worry that the interpersonal relations of highly successful
people are interrupted. Fear of success is important in terms
of explaining the obstructive attitudes. Fear of negative
outcomes of success is the most important determinant in
the emergence of fear of success [3]. Individuals who
perceive the consequences of being successful as a threat
reveal fear of success as a result of the anxiety to confront
this threat [4]. Fear of success was first coined by Horner in
the late 1960s [5]. In an article published in 1974, Horner
argued that the sense of raising children, which is
manifested by an extreme competition-based lifestyle,
augments and fuels fear of success. On the other hand,
cognitive approaches explain avoiding success as a learned
response, which is presented by people who are successful
at a socially unacceptable level and they argued that this
turns into a role and habit learned from other people [6].
According to the reconciliation approach, fear of success
emerges with a sense of avoiding success and stems from
an effort to reach a compromise between conflicting goals
[7]. There are also studies in the related literature that
Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(6): 1278-1285, 2018 1279
describe fear of success as a type of anxiety. Researchers
with this view preferred the concept of "The Impact of
Negative Consequences of Success" instead of the concept
of fear of success and started studies on developing scales
accordingly [8], [9].
The concept of life satisfaction, first coined by
Neugarten in 1961, is the result or situation obtained by
comparing what a person expects and what they have [10].
Life satisfaction represents the cognitive direction of
subjective well-being from concepts related to human
happiness. Subjective well-being is defined as cognitive
and emotional evaluation of a person's life. This evaluation
includes the emotional response to the events and the
cognitive assessment of satisfaction. When people feel
many pleasant and unpleasant emotions, when they are
involved in engaging activities, experience too much joy
and too little pain and when they are satisfied with the lives,
they experience a high level of subjective well-being. The
subjective well-being focuses on self-assessment of one's
life. Life satisfaction is defined as the general assessment
of the quality of life according to the self-chosen criteria.
Life satisfaction includes the satisfaction of the present life,
the desire to change life, the satisfaction of the past, the
satisfaction of the future and the opinion of the person's
relatives about that person's life. Satisfaction areas may
include work, family, leisure time, health, money, self and
person's immediate surroundings [11] (Dost, M. T. 2007:
2).
To summarize the explanations on self-efficacy, fear of
success and life satisfaction provided so for; self-efficacy is
the belief that one has the necessary skills to perform an
ai m [1]. Fear of success can be defined as the behaviors of
avoiding success resulting from the anxieties of that those
who overwork are negatively evaluated, the works of very
successful individuals are sabotaged by others, and so
resulting in the formation of low goals, the tendency
towards easy tasks, the diminution of attainment with the
worry that the interpersonal relations of highly successful
people are interrupted. Life satisfaction is an element
related to the individual's general feeling of well-being.
Life satisfaction is, besides being related to quality of life,
not a concept that is enough to explain all life quality and
life satisfaction. It is believed that self-efficacy and life
satisfaction are effective in determining the life goals of the
individual and in reaching these goals. Although
self-efficacy and life satisfaction seem to be two sources
supporting and feeding each other, fear of success is a
pressure and threat to both. Accordingly, the purpose of the
present research is to reveal the relation between these
three variables and their power of influence on each other.
We hope that the findings will provide important insights
into any kind of psychological support studies on
improving the quality of life.
The main purpose of the present research is to reveal the
relationship between self-efficacy, fear of success and life
satisfaction; and determining the predictive power of
self-efficacy on fear of success and fear of success and
self-efficacy on life's satisfaction.
2. Materials and Methods
Relational screening model was adopted in the present
research. Data collection tools prepared for this purpose
were applied on 625 subjects. Among the universe of the
research, 295 current students in the psychological
counseling and guidance departments, and 330 individuals
who have graduated from this department were reached.
2.1. Data Collection Tools
Three different data collection tools were used in the
present research. The first is the
Self-Efficacy-Competence Scale (SESS) developed by
Sherrer et al [12] and adapted to Turkish by Gözüm and
Aksayan [13] . The scale consists of 23 items and has four
sub-scales. These are initiating behavior, maintaining
behavior, completing behavior and struggling with
obstacles. The scale measures the general self-efficacy
perception that is not specific to any specific domain. The
Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the
Turkish form of the scale was .81, and test-retest
reliability was found as ,92 [13].
The second data collection tool used in the present
research was the 21-item Fear of Success Scale developed
by Hyland and Dann [7] and adapted to Turkish by Melli
[14]. Correlations between item-total test scores of the
Fear of Success Scale vary between .074 and .467. The
internal consistency coefficient was found as r=.72. The
scale has 4 subscales; Social Outcomes of Success,
Negating Success, Internal Anxiety and Avoiding
Success.
The third data collection tool used in the present
research is "Life Satisfaction Scale" developed by Diener,
Emmons, Larsen and Griffin [15]. The scale, which was
adapted to Turkish by Dagli and Baysal [16], consists of 5
questions in one factor. The reliability of LSS was defined
with the Cronbach Alpha consistency coefficient and the
test-retest technique and internal consistency coefficient
was calculated as r=0.88 for the whole scale.
2.2. Statistical Analysis
In the analysis of the data; independent t test was utilized
to determine whether fear of achievement and self-efficacy
perceptions varied by gender variable. The level of
significance was taken as .05. Linear regression analysis
was utilized to determine the relationship and the level of
prediction between the variables and sub-scales of the
scales.
3. Results
Results obtained in the present research are presented in
1280 Fear of Success and Life Satisfaction in terms of Self-efficacy
this part.
3.1. The General Case on Self-efficacy
The results of the descriptive analysis of the findings
obtained from the self-efficacy scale are presented in
Table 1. Taken that the maximum score of the scale was
110 and the arithmetic mean of the subjects was 83.68
into consideration; we can claim that the participants in
the sample have a high level of self-efficacy. The
proportion of the arithmetic average to the maximum
score in terms of sub-scales; shows that the subjects have
the highest self-efficacy in terms of completing the
behavior and the lowest terms of struggling with obstacles.
Additionally, the highest variability among the four
subscales was in the response to the initiation behavior
subscale (s=5,37) and the least variance was observed in
the struggling with obstacles subscale (2.34).
3.2. Analysis Results for Findings Descriptive Analysis
Tab le 1. Descriptive Analysis of the Findings Obtained from the
Self-Efficacy Scale
Sub-scales of
the
Self-efficac y
Scale
N Min. Max. Mean Std.
Deviation
Initiating
Behaviour
625 8,00 40,00 29,55 5,37
Mai ntaini ng
Behaviour
625 11,00 33,00 25,06 3,70
Completing
Behaviour
625 7,00 25,00 19,77 3,35
Struggli ng
Wit h
Obstacles
625 3,00 15,00 9,30 2,34
Self-Efficacy
Scale General
625 37,00 110,00 83,68 11,90
Tab le 2. Descriptive Analysis of the Findings Obtained from the Fear
of Success Scale
Fear of
Success
Subscales
N Minimum Maximu m Me an Std.
Dev.
Social
outcomes
of
Success
625 7,00 35,00 25,72 5,73
Negati ng
Success
625 7,00 35,00 15,43 4,88
Internal
Anxiet y
625 4,00 20,00 10,75 3,53
Avoiding
Success
625 3,00 15,00 7,12 2,83
Fear of
Success
Scale
General
625 21,00 105,00 59,03 9,48
3.3. Findings Related to the Prediction of Self-efficacy
Perception of Fear of Success
Findings related to the extent to which self-efficacy
perception predicts fear of success are presented in Table 3.
As presented in Table 3; self-efficacy generally
explains the 11% of fear of success (F=19.488; R2=0.11;
p=0.001). There is a significant correlation between all
sub-scales of self-efficacy and fear of achievement at .05
level. There is a negative correlation between completing
the behavior and the struggling with obstacles subscales of
self-efficacy and fear of success. There is a weak positive
relationship between the completing the behavior and the
struggling with obstacles subscales and the fear of success.
In terms of self-efficacy predicting the fear success,
initiating behavior subscale is ranked first among the four
subscales of self-efficacy. This is respectively followed by
completing the behavior, maintaining behavior, and
struggling with obstacles.
Tab le 3. Results of the Analysis on the Prediction of Perception of Self-efficacy of the Fear of Success
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β t p R Partial r
(Co nstant) 68,108 2,672 25,489 ,001
Initiating Behaviour -,491 ,097 -,278 -5,071 ,001 -,242 -,200
Mai nta ining Behaviou r -,370 ,139 -,145 -2,661 ,008 -,205 -,106
Completing Behaviour ,500 ,142 ,177 3,528 ,000 ,031 ,140
Struggli ng Wit h
Obstacles ,518 ,184 ,128 2,821 ,005 ,072 ,113
R=0.33, R2=0.11, F=19.488, p=0.001
Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(6): 1278-1285, 2018 1281
3.4. Findings Related to the Prediction of
Self-proficiency Perception of Social Outcomes of
Success Subscale of Fear of Success
The findings related to the prediction of self-efficacy
perception of “Social outcomes of Success” subscale are
presented in Table 4. As presented in Table 4, self-efficacy
explains the 7% of "social outcomes of success" subscale
of fear of success (F=12.399, R2=0.07, p=0.001). There is
a significant correlation between maintaining behavior
and completing behavior subscales of self-efficacy and
fear of success at .05 level. There was no significant
relationship between the initiating the behavior and the
struggling with obstacles subscales and fear of success. In
terms of self-efficacy predicting the social outcomes of
success subscale of fear success, completing behavior
subscale is ranked first among the four subscales of
self-efficacy. This is respectively followed by maintaining
behavior, initiating the behavior, and struggling with
obstacles subscales.
3.5. Findings Related to the Prediction of
Self-proficiency Perception of Negating Success
Subscale of Fear of Success
The findings related to the prediction of self-efficacy
perception of “Negating Success” subscale are presented in
Table 5.
As presented in Table 5, self-efficacy explains the 16%
of "negating success" subscale of fear of success (F=28.74;
R2=0.16; p=0.001). There are significant negative
correlations between all subscales of self-efficacy and
negating success subscale fear of success at .05 level. This
finding suggests that negating success decreases at the
extent that perceptions are positive in four subscales of
self-efficacy; from another perspective that as negating
success decreases self-efficacy sub-scale scores increase.
In terms of self-efficacy predicting the negating success
subscale of fear success, initiating the behavior subscale is
ranked first among the four subscales of self-efficacy.
This is respectively followed by maintaining behavior,
struggling with obstacles subscales and completing the
behavior subscales.
Tab le 4. Results of the Analysis on the Prediction of Perception of Self-Efficacy of the “Social outcomes of Success” subscale of Fear of Success
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β t p R Partial r
(Co nstant) 14,553 1,648 8,829 ,000
Initiating Behaviour ,077 ,060 ,073 1,297 ,195 ,217 ,052
Maintaining Behaviour ,141 ,086 ,091 1,642 ,009 ,221 ,066
Completing Behaviour ,269 ,087 ,158 3,082 ,002 ,241 ,123
Struggling With Obstacles ,003 ,113 ,001 ,026 ,979 ,145 ,001
R=0.27, R2=0.07, F=12.399, p=0.001
Tab le 5. Results of the Analysis on the Prediction of Perception of Self-Efficacy of the “Negating Success” subscale of Fear of Success
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β t p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 25,806 1,341 19,238 ,000
Initiating Behaviour -,251 ,049 -,276 -5,172 ,000 -,348 -,203
Mai nta ining Behaviou r -,266 ,070 -,202 -3,817 ,000 -,328 -,152
Completing Behaviour ,051 ,071 ,035 ,713 ,476 -,132 ,029
Struggling With Obstacles ,293 ,092 ,140 3,176 ,002 -,012 ,127
R=0.40, R2=0.16, F= 28.74, p=0.001
1282 Fear of Success and Life Satisfaction in terms of Self-efficacy
3.6. Findings Related to the Prediction of
Self-proficiency Perception of Internal Anxiety
Subscale of Fear of Success
The findings related to the prediction of self-efficacy
perception of “Internal Anxiety” subscale are presented in
Table 6.
As presented in Table 6, self-efficacy explains the 13%
of "internal anxiety" subscale of fear of success (F=22.639;
R2=0.13; p=0.001). There are significant negative
correlations between all subscales of self-efficacy and
internal anxiety subscale fear of success at .05 level.
Likewise, this finding suggests that internal decreases at
the extent that perceptions are positive in initiating,
maintaining and completing the behavior and struggling
with obstacles subscales of self-efficacy. In terms of
self-efficacy predicting the internal anxiety subscale of
fear success, initiating the behavior subscale is ranked
first among the four subscales of self-efficacy. This is
respectively followed by completing behavior,
maintaining behavior and struggling with obstacles
subscales.
3.7. Findings Related to the Prediction of
Self-proficiency Perception of Avoiding Success
Subscale of Fear of Success
The findings related to the prediction of self-efficacy
perception of “Avoiding Success” subscale are presented
in Table 7.
As presented in Table 7, self-efficacy explains the 10%
of "avoiding success" subscale of fear of success
(F=16.210; R2=0.10; p=0.001). There are significant
negative correlations between initiating the behavior,
maintaining the behavior and struggling with obstacles
subscales of self-efficacy and internal anxiety subscale
fear of success at .05 level. However, there are no
significant relations between completing the behavior
subscale of self-efficacy and avoiding success subscale of
fear of success. This finding suggests that all subscales
but completing the behavior subscale of self-efficacy are
negatively correlated with avoiding success subscale of
fear of success. In terms of self-efficacy predicting the
avoiding success subscale of fear success, maintaining the
behavior subscale is ranked first among the four subscales
of self-efficacy. This is respectively followed by initiating
the behavior and struggling with obstacles subscales.
Tab le 6. Results of the Analysis on the Prediction of Perception of Self-Efficacy of the “Internal Anxiety” subscale of Fear of Success
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β t p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 16,027 ,986 16,254 ,000
Initiating Behaviour -,224 ,036 -,341 -6,282 ,000 -,319 -,245
Mai nta ining Behaviou r -,102 ,051 -,107 -1,995 ,046 -,251 -,080
Completing Behaviour ,180 ,052 ,171 3,443 ,001 -,044 ,137
Struggling With Obstacles ,039 ,068 ,026 ,574 ,566 -,043 ,023
R=0.36, R2=0.13, F=22.639, p=0.001
Tab le 7. Results of the Analysis on the Prediction of Perception of Self-Efficacy of the “Avoiding Success” subscale of Fear of Success
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β T p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 11,722 ,807 14,528 ,000
Initiating Behaviour -,093 ,029 -,175 -3,170 ,002 -,250 -,126
Mai nta ining Behaviou r -,142 ,042 -,186 -3,383 ,001 -,255 -,135
Completing Behaviour ,000 ,043 ,000 -,005 ,996 -,101 ,000
Struggling With Obstacles ,183 ,055 ,151 3,305 ,001 ,023 ,132
R=0.31, R2=0.10, F=16.210, p=0.001
Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(6): 1278-1285, 2018 1283
3.8. Findings Related to the Relationship between
Success Fear, Self-efficacy Perception and Life
Satisfaction
One of the objectives of the present research is finding
out whether fear of success and self-efficacy has any
effects on life satisfaction. The findings of this analysis are
presented in Table 8. As presented in Table 8, fear of
success and self-efficacy perception together explain 14%
of life satisfaction (F=49.982, R2=0.14, p=0.001). While
self-efficacy explains the 13% of this variation alone, this
rate increases to 14% along with fear of success. There is
a significant positive correlation between self-efficacy and
life satisfaction at .01 level and there was a significant
negative correlation between fear of success and life
satisfaction at .01 level.
3.11. Findings Related to the Relations between
Self-efficacy Perception Subscales and Life
Satisfaction
Findings related to the relationships between
self-efficacy perception and life satisfaction in terms of
subscales are presented in Table 9. As presented in Table 9,
the effective subscale of self-efficacy on life satisfaction is
“initiating the behavior” subscale. Initiating the behavior
subscale can explain the 9% of life satisfaction. This is
followed by “Struggling with Obstacles” subscale.
Struggling with obstacles explains the 6.5% of life
satisfaction. This is followed by completing the behavior
subscale, while the relationship between maintaining the
behavior subscale and life satisfaction isn’t significant.
3.12. Findings Related to the Relations between Fear of
Success Subscales and Life Satisfaction
Findings related to the relationships between fear of
success and life satisfaction are presented in Table 10.
Without self-efficacy, fear of success explains the 8% of
variation in life satisfaction. In other words, 8% of life
satisfaction can be explained by fear of success. When the
table is studied in terms of sub-scales of fear of success;
the relationships between three sub-scales of fear of
success except for the "Social outcomes of Success" and
life satisfaction are negative. Among the four sub-scales,
the only sub-scale positively correlated with life
satisfaction is the "Social Results of Success" subscale.
Among the four subscales, only the "internal anxiety"
sub-scale is significantly related with life satisfaction. The
relationship between life satisfaction and internal anxiety
subscale is significant at .01 level. In terms of fear of
success predicting the life satisfaction, internal anxiety
subscale is ranked first among the four subscales. This is
respectively followed by "social outcomes of success",
"avoiding success" and "internal anxiety".
Tab le 8. Analysis Results on ear of Success and the Self-Efficacy Predicting Life Satisfaction
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β t p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 14,675 2,063 7,115 ,000
Self-efficacy ,156 ,017 ,343 9,125 ,000 ,359 ,344
Fear of Success -,057 ,022 -,101 -2,670 ,008 -,152 -,106
R=0.37, R2=0.14, F=49.982, p=0.001
Tab le 9. Findings related to the Self-Efficacy Perception Subscales Predicting Life Satisfaction
Self-efficacy Subscales B SHB β T p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 11,152 1,510 7,387 ,000
Initiating Behaviour ,184 ,055 ,183 3,367 ,001 ,316 ,134
Mai ntaini ng Behaviour ,090 ,079 ,061 1,144 ,253 ,277 ,046
Completing Behaviour ,152 ,080 ,094 1,894 ,049 ,282 ,076
Struggling With Obstacles ,272 ,104 ,117 2,618 ,009 ,256 ,105
R=0.36, R2=0.13, F=23.416, p=0.001
Tab le 10. Findings related to the Fear of Success Subscales Predicting Life Satisfaction
Fear of Success Subscales B SHB β T p r Partial r
(Co nstant) 27,080 1,416 19,118 ,000
Social outcomes of Success ,049 ,039 ,062 1,514 ,131 ,058 ,061
Negating Success -,005 ,056 -,005 -,099 ,921 -,130 -,004
Internal Anxiety -,419 ,067 -,273 -6,232 ,000 -,267 -,243
Avoiding Success ,051 ,086 ,027 ,590 ,556 -,070 ,024
R=0.27, R2=0.08, F=12.613, p=0.001
1284 Fear of Success and Life Satisfaction in terms of Self-efficacy
4. Discussion
The present research has revealed that three variables
(self-efficacy, fear of success and life satisfaction)
interrelated. The relationship between self-efficacy and
fear of success is negative. Although the present research
doesn’t directly address to self-efficacy and fear of
success, the findings are in agreement with of some other
studies. Many previous studies have reported negative
relationships between low self-efficacy and low
self-esteem, depression and despair [1]. The present
research has found that there is a negative correlation
between self-efficacy, especially its "initiating behavior"
and "maintaining behavior" subscales and fear of success.
Taken that “initiating behavior” is the first step of an act
intended for a purpose, this finding has a logical basis.
The fact that an individual who has fear of success avoids
taking the first step on his path to success is particularly
emphasized in the study conducted by Miller [4].
Similarly, it is known that many people fail to succeed in
maintaining the behavior stage, even if they can manage
initiating the behavior stage. In our daily lives, there are
examples of many unfinished and quit tasks and acts. A
significant and negative correlation between these two
sub-scales of self-efficiency and fear of success is an
imp ortant finding in this respect.
Since self-efficacy is defined as the belief that the
individual can perform the behavior that produces the
result [2]; it is possible to consider the fear of success as
anxiety experienced due to the consequences of this belief,
which reveals the relationship between self-efficacy
perception and fear of success.
A similar interpretation can be provided for the
relationship between fear of success and life satisfaction.
According to the findings of the present research there is a
correlation of -15 between fear of success and life
satisfaction. R2 was calculated as 0.14. This finding
suggests that fear of success affects life satisfaction
negatively. Taken O'Sullivan’s [17] study revealing that
hope is the best predictor of life satisfaction and that fear
of success is a loss of hope in to consideration, the
findings of the present research are in complete agreement
with the findings of O'Sullivan.
A similar interpretation can be provided about the
relationship between self-efficacy perception and life
satisfaction. According to the findings of the present
research there is a positive correlation of .36 between
self-efficacy and life satisfaction. This finding is in
agreement with many previous studies. A previous study
by Vecchio et al. [18], reported that the strongest variable
that predicted life satisfaction was the self-efficacy
perception. The findings of the researches conducted by
Caprara, G. V., Patrizia Steca [19] and Şahin [20] are also
in agreement with the findings of the present research.
Additionally, another important finding of the present
research is that "initiating behavior" sub-scale of
self-efficacy is the strongest predictor of life satisfaction.
The "internal anxiety" subscale is the strongest predictor
of life satisfaction among the subscales of fear of success.
When these two findings are taken together, we can
mention the importance of "not being able to start
behavior" that is resulted from internal anxiety for
humans.
According to the findings of the present research, there
is no significant difference across genders in terms of both
the fear of success and self-efficacy perception. As
mentioned in the literature review, there are a number of
researches that report different findings on gender variable
[21] (Condry and Dyer, 1976: 237-248). The fact that
Stiver [22], in particular, reported no difference between
women and men in terms of fear of success, is in complete
agreement with the findings of the present research. On
the other hand, there was a significant difference across
genders in the subscale of "internal anxiety".
5. Conclusions
Consequently; the correlation values between the
variables are low when the research results are generally
evaluated. For this reason, data in our research provide
limited information for psychotherapy and intervention.
According to the findings that self-efficacy is affected by
fear of success and fear of success and self-efficacy also
have effects on life satisfaction; any kind of psychological
help to reduce the fear of success will self-efficacy.
Similarly, every effort to improve self-efficacy will reduce
fear of success. The increase in self-efficacy perception
and the decrease in fear of success will increase the
individuals’ life satisfaction.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Bandura. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of
behavioral change. Psychological Review, Vol.84, 191-215,
1977.
[2] J. E. Maddux. Self-Efficacy: The Power of Believing You
Can. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University
Press, New York, p.2-3, 2000.
[3] C. Bauer, V. Friedrich, M. Wimber. Furcht vor
Erfolg-Zusammenhang mit Sozialer Angst und Furcht vor
Kritik [Fear of Success-Related with Social Anxiety and
Fear of Criticism]. University of Regensburg, Regensburg,
2002.
[4] J. Miller. Fear of Success: Psychodynamic Implications.
Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis,
Vol.22, No.1, 129-136, 1994.
[5] M. S. Horner. The measurement and behavior implications
of fear of success in women. In: Motivation and
Achievement. J. W. Atkinson, J. O. Raynor (eds.). Winston,
Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(6): 1278-1285, 2018 1285
Washington, DC, 1974.
[6] N. T. Feather, A. C. Raphelson. Fear of success in
Australian and American student groups: Motive or
Sex-Role Stereotype? Journal of Personality, Vol.42,
190-201, 1974.
[7] M. E. Hyland. There is No Motive to Avoid Success: The
Compromise Explanation for Success-Avoiding Behavior.
Journal of Personality, Vol.57, No.3, 665-693, 1989.
[8] K. R. Gelbort, J. L. Winer. Fear of success and fear of
failure : A mu ltit ra it-multimethod validation study. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.48, No.4,
1009-1014, 1985.
[9] S. Sadd, M. Leauner, P. Shaver, N. Dunivant. Objective
Measurement of Fear of Success and Fear of Failure: A
Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, Vol.46, No.3, 405-416, 1978.
[10] M. K. Özer. Yaşlılarda Yaşam Doyumu. Geriatri, Vol.6, No.
2, 72-74, 2003.
[11] M. Tuzgöl Dost. Examining Life Satisfaction Levels of
University Students in Terms of Some Variables.
Pamukkale University Journal of Education, Vol.22, No.2,
132-143, 2007.
[12] M. Sherer, J. E. Maddux, B. Mercandante, S. Prentice-Dunn,
B. Jacobs, R. W. Rogers. The Self-efficacy Scale:
Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, Vol.51,
No.2, 663-671, 1982.
[13] S. Gözüm, S. Aksayan. Öz-etkililik-yeter lik ölç i’n in
Türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçer liği. Atatürk
Ünivers itesi Heire lik Yüksekoukul Dergis i, Vol.2, No.l,
21-34, 1999.
[14] Melli-Köktürk, A. S. (2000). Çok boyutlu Başarı Korkusu
Ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması ve başarı korkusu ile
kendini kurgulama düzeyi arasındaki ilişki (Yüksek lisans
tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, pp.
96-105, 2000.
[15] E. Diener, R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsen, S. Griffin. The
satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality
Assessment, Vol.49, No.1, 71-75, 1985.
[16] A. Dağlı, N. Baysal. Adaptation of the Satisfaction With
Life Scale into Turkish: The Study of Validity And
Reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.15,
No.59, 1250-1262, 2016.
[17] G. O’Sullivan. The Relationship between Hope, Eustress,
Self -Efficacy, and Life Satisfaction among Undergraduates.
Social Indicators Research. Vol.101, No.1, 155-172, 2011.
[18] G. M. Vecchio, M. Gerb ino, C. Pastorelli, G. Del Bove, G.
V. Caprara. Multi-faceted self-efficacy beliefs as predictors
of life satisfaction in late adolescence. Personality and
Individual Differences, Vol.43, 1807-1818, 2007.
[19] G. V. Caprara, P. Steca. Selfefficacy beliefs as
determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life
satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical
Psychology, Vol.24, No.2, 191-217, 2005.
[20] D. Şahin. The investigation of teacher's self-compassion
from the point of resilience and life satisfaction. Master of
Science Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon,
pp. 77-81, 2014.
[21] Orlofsky, J.L. A comparison of projective and objective
fear-of-success and sex-role orientation measures as
predictors of women's performance on masculine and
feminine tasks. Sex Roles, Volume 7, Number 10, Page 999,
1981.
[22] S. B. Stiver. Fear of Success: A Motive to Avoid Success or
a Response to Violat ion of Sex-Role Prescriptions?
Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University, pp. 145-148,
1977.
... Approached in this manner, fear of success has four components (i.e., underlying dimensions). These include perceived social outcomes of success, internal anxiety about success, and the tendencies to (separately) negate success and avoid success (Metzler & Conroy, 2004;Yilmaz, 2018). Social outcomes can include a variety of perceived costs such as being conspicuous, guilt over excessive good fortune, alienation from significant others, new role responsibilities and pressures, loss of identity, and social rejection. ...
... Stanculescu (2013) found, in an educational context, fear of success was positively associated with an individual's search for meaning and negatively related to optimism, self-esteem, and selfefficacy. Yilmaz (2018) shows how higher fear of success is related to lower self-efficacy and lower life satisfaction among recent college graduates. In competitive sports, André and Metzler (2011) report a relationship between this fear and concentration disruption, somatic anxiety, and a disposition to pursue mastery-avoidance goals. ...
... A possible mediator between FLEs and CWB is self-efficacy, defined as people's confidence in their ability to control their functioning and the events that impact their lives (Bandura 1977). This idea is supported by previous research linking GSE with SWB and LS (Cattelino et al. 2023;Hussein Alkhatib 2020;Yilmaz 2018;Savi Çakar 2012). The connection of GSE with positive life expectations has been explored by Kim (2014), while other studies identified strong correlations of GSE with optimism (Karademas et al. 2007;Yu and Luo 2018), hope, and positive expectations (Gallagher et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
(1) Background and Objective: The debate on the stability and variability of subjective wellbeing (SWB) is decades old. However, despite the wealth of literature on this topic, there are relatively few studies that aim to explain the “why” and “how” of the dynamics of SWB. In this context, the objective of this exploratory study is to test the plausibility of a model of the cognitive component of SWB (CWB) inspired by the control theory. In this model, a measure of future life expectations (FLEs) serves as a target in the control loop regulating cognitive wellbeing (CWB), while general self-efficacy (GSE) and affective wellbeing (AWB) are mediators in the direct and feedback loops. (2) Method: To test this model, we collected data from a convenience sample of N-98 Romanian students in Computer Science using well-established questionnaires measuring CWB, GSE, AWB, and FLE. Mediation analyses and path modeling were conducted to evaluate the feedback-based model of the interplay between these variables. (3) Results: The findings confirm a significant relationship between FLE and CWB (β = 0.62, p < 0.001). GSE partially mediates the link between FLE and CWB (β = 0.139, p = 0.02), while AWB mediates the feedback from CWB to FLE (β = 0.297, p < 0.001). The model explains 42% of the variance of CWB. (4) Conclusions: Our study remains exploratory in nature, but preliminary data suggest that a model of SWB based on feedback control is worth attention as it might provide a better understanding of the dynamics of SWB.
... Empirical studies have demonstrated that self-esteem was associated with fear of success among adults in Iran (Honarmand et al., 2005) and Romania (Stanculescu, 2013), as well as managers in a multinational company in India (Kaur & Kaur, 2018). Persons with lower self-esteem also have lower self-efficacy-which have been found to be associated with fear of success in a Kyrgyzstan mixed sample (Yilmaz, 2018). Research on fear of success in the African socio-cultural setting is scarce and there is even more limited attention to the contributions of self-esteem in fear of success among adults in the sub-Saharan African educational setting. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fear of success is a negative experience which influences satisfaction with life and overall wellbeing. Socio-demographic factors (e.g., age and gender) and self-esteem have been found to be associated with fear of success. However, whether gender and age influence how self-esteem is liked to fear of success has received little attention. We examined the moderating roles of gender and age moderate in the relationship between self-esteem and fear of success. Participants were 350 Nigerian adults who completed the Index of Self-esteem and the Fear of Success Scale. Hayes regression-based PROCESS macro results indicated that those with low self-esteem reported higher fear of success. Neither age nor gender was associated with fear of success. Gender and age did not moderate the association between self-esteem and fear of success. Interventions to boost people’s self-esteem should be considered in efforts to reduce fear of success.
... As noted above, our findings suggest that student self-efficacy influences life satisfaction positively. The impact of self-efficacy on life satisfaction has been evidenced in numerous studies [70,71]. In a context of job insecurity and uncertainty, the perception of self-efficacy has been shown to be a resilience factor that allows stressors to be moderated and thus promotes life satisfaction. ...
Article
Full-text available
Recent research has shown that self-efficacy has a positive relationship with life satisfaction and with the perception of access to decent work. On the other hand, a perception of instability regarding the profession is negatively correlated with these dimensions. Few authors have studied these constructs within the same research. Therefore, the aim of the study was to fill this gap in the literature by testing a structural equation model in which the perception of access to decent work could mediate between perceived self-efficacy in one’s training and life satisfaction, and between perceived instability of the profession and life satisfaction. Data was collected through an online research survey. Five hundred and seventeen university students (104 males and 413 females) aged between 18 and 30 years (M = 22.50; ds = 2.61) from three different countries participated: 181 were Italian, 173 were Swiss, and 163 were Spanish. The results only partially confirmed our model. The idea of finding a decent work mediates the relationship between perceived job instability and life satisfaction, but not between self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Perceived self-efficacy together with the idea of finding a decent work have a direct effect on life satisfaction. In career development, counselors must take into account what the perception of job instability entails for students, which may be demotivating and not allow future workers to imagine a decent job.
... In other words, general self-efficacy increases life satisfaction by increasing hope. This finding is consistent with studies showing a positive relationship between self-efficacy and life satisfaction (Aydıner, 2011;Şimşir & Dilmaç, 2021;Yeşilnacar, 2020;Yılmaz, 2018). In this respect, it is quite meaningful that it increases life satisfaction by increasing hope in the relationship between general self-efficacy and life satisfaction. ...
Article
This study examines the mediating role of hope in the relationship between grit, general self-efficacy, and life satisfaction. The sample of the study consisted of 485 university students (68.7% female). The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 39 (Mean: 20.85, SD: 2.30). According to the findings of the study, positive significant relationships were found between grit, general self-efficacy, hope and life satisfaction. hope fully mediated the impact of grit on life satisfaction. Additionally, hope fully mediates the effect of general self-efficacy on life satisfaction. These findings suggest that grit and general self-efficacy associated with life satisfaction can be better understood with hope. Hope can be a factor that increases individuals' resilience and general self-efficacy and is an important aspect of positive-based interventions.
Article
Introduction . The relevance of studying this topic is due to the insufficient knowledge of such a phenomenon as “success avoidance”. An analysis of existing studies has shown that the motive of “avoiding success” is almost not studied in comparison with the motives for achieving success and avoiding failure. Avoidance of success, in turn, has been studied only in women, and attempts have been made to establish the causes and consequences of its occurrence. In our study, for the first time, the specificity of personality traits and values of men and women with varying degrees of success avoidance orientation is considered. Purpose . The study of personal traits and values of men and women depending on the severity of the orientation towards avoiding success. Materials and methods. The study used the projective method of avoiding success by M. Horner in the modification of T. V. Bendas; the 16-factor personality questionnaire by R. B. Kettell (Form C); the Value questionnaire by Sh. Schwartz; methods of mathematical statistics (Friedman, Wilcoxon criteria). Results . The study involved 70 people – men and women aged 20 to 35 years. It has been found that women and men with a low degree of success avoidance orientation have sociability, social courage, skepticism and innovation, as well as responsibility and emotional stability; along with this, women are more anxious and sensitive, and men are more selfconfident. With a moderate degree of focus on avoiding success, women are characterized by leading values, and men are characterized by leading personality traits. Discussion . The analysis of empirical data shows that men and women who do not avoid success are characterized by almost identical personality traits, but a different value structure – women have a leading value, and the value sphere of men is conflicted. The results of this study provide a basis for discussion and additional analysis of issues related to success avoidance.
Article
Background Life satisfaction is a key component of students' subjective well‐being due to its impact on academic achievement and lifelong health. Although previous studies have investigated life satisfaction through different lenses, few of them employed machine learning (ML) approaches. Objective Using ML algorithms, the current study predicts secondary students' life satisfaction from individual‐level variables. Method Two supervised ML models, random forest (RF) and k‐nearest neighbours (KNN), were developed based on the UK data and the Japan data in PISA 2018. Results Findings show that (1) both models yielded better performance on the UK data than on the Japanese data; (2) the RF model outperformed the KNN model in predicting students' life satisfaction; (3) meaning in life, student competition, teacher support, exposure to bullying and ICT resources at home and at school played important roles in predicting students' life satisfaction. Conclusions Theoretically, this study highlights the multi‐dimensional nature of life satisfaction and identifies several key predictors. Methodologically, this study is the first to use ML to explore the predictors of life satisfaction. Practically, it serves as a reference for improving secondary students' life satisfaction.
Article
Full-text available
Bu çalışmada, dışsal amaçların yaşam doyumuna etkisinde kültürler arası farklılık araştırılmıştır. Batıdaki araştırmalarda dışsal amaçların yaşam doyumuna etkisinin olmadığı ya da negatif olduğu belirtilirken, bazı kültürlerde durumun farklı olabileceğine ilişkin bulgular söz konudur. Çağdaş yönetim anlayışlarında, olumsuz çıktılarından dolayı dışsal amaçlar, örgütlerde kanser hücresi muamelesi görmekte ve kişisel gelişim destekleriyle azaltılmaya veya yok edilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bununla beraber dışsal amaçlar, bireysel değil sosyolojik bağlamda ele alınacak olursa, yönetim anlayışlarına durumsal bir bakış açısı sağlanabilecektir. Araştırmada dışsal amaçların yaşam doyumuna etkisi Kırgızistan ve Türkiye toplumlarında anket yöntemi ile karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Toplamda 842 üniversite öğrencisi ile çalışılmıştır. Türkiye’de dışsal motivasyon yaşam doyumuna etki etmezken, Kırgızistan’da pozitif etki etmektedir. Ayrıca Kırgızistan’daki etkinin yolunu anlamak için özyeterlik ve özsaygı ölçümleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yol analizi sonucu, dışsal motivasyonun yaşam doyumuna etkisinde özyeterlik ve özsaygının tam aracılık ettiği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.
Article
Egy személynél a teljesítmény csökkenésének hátterében számos ok húzódhat meg, kezdve a képességbeli hiányosságoktól, a motivációs tényezőkön át egészen az érzelmi akadályozó tényezőkig. Ez utóbbihoz kapcsolható a sikertől való félelem fogalma, melyet Horner írt le 1969-ben. A sikerhez való negatív hozzáállás következtében módosulhat a sikerekből származó pozitív affektusok és élmények erőssége, hiányzik vagy teljesen lecsökken a teljesítményhez kapcsolódó büszkeség, öröm megélése, ami egyúttal generálhat egyféle motiváció-redukciót, vagy félelmet a további sikerekkel kapcsolatban. A Sikertől való félelem skála [FOSS] (Zuckerman és Allison, 1976) hazai validálásával itthon is lehetőség adódott, hogy vizsgáljuk a jelenséget. A minta mentálisan egészséges, felnőtt személyekből állt (207 fő, 36 férfi, 170 nő), átlagéletkoruk 36 év, (szórása: 14,25). Konfirmatív faktoranalízis segítségével vizsgáltuk, hogy a magyar mintán kialakított kérdőív faktorstruktúrája megegyezik-e a külföldi szerzők által felállított struktúrával. A CFA a magyar tételek külföldi faktorokba való illeszkedését nem támogatta, így egyik modell se bizonyult sem statisztikailag, sem tartalmilag elfogadhatónak, még a modifikációs index és a tételek kereszttöltésének figyelembevételéve sem. A feltáró faktorelemzés is hasonló eredményeket hozott: 7 faktor fennállását támogatta, azonban rengeteg kereszttöltésű tétellel és az elvárttól alacsonyabb összvarianciával, így ezen modell is elvetésre került. Mindezen eredmények miatt a faktorok, illetve a skála egészének belső konzisztencia vizsgálata, valamint a skála konkurens és konvergens validitás vizsgálata is feleslegessé vált. A kapott eredmények alapján elmondható, hogy egy megbízható és valid mérőeszköz kidolgozásához szükséges a sikertől való félelem fogalmának, jelenségkörének és pontos tartalmának megfelelő tisztázása, hogy az ez alapján kialakított skála tartalmai homogénebbek legyenek.
Article
Full-text available
Presents an integrative theoretical framework to explain and to predict psychological changes achieved by different modes of treatment. This theory states that psychological procedures, whatever their form, alter the level and strength of self-efficacy. It is hypothesized that expectations of personal efficacy determine whether coping behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face of obstacles and aversive experiences. Persistence in activities that are subjectively threatening but in fact relatively safe produces, through experiences of mastery, further enhancement of self-efficacy and corresponding reductions in defensive behavior. In the proposed model, expectations of personal efficacy are derived from 4 principal sources of information: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological states. Factors influencing the cognitive processing of efficacy information arise from enactive, vicarious, exhortative, and emotive sources. The differential power of diverse therapeutic procedures is analyzed in terms of the postulated cognitive mechanism of operation. Findings are reported from microanalyses of enactive, vicarious, and emotive modes of treatment that support the hypothesized relationship between perceived self-efficacy and behavioral changes. (21/2 p ref)
Article
Full-text available
Tested the self-efficacy hypotheses that (1) personal mastery expectations are the primary determinants of behavioral change and (2) individual differences in past experiences and attribution of success to skill or chance result in different levels of generalized self-efficacy expectations. A Self-Efficacy Scale was developed and tested with 376 college students. Factor analysis yielded 2 subscales: a General Self-Efficacy subscale (17 items) and a Social Self-Efficacy subscale (6 items). Confirmation of several predicted conceptual relationships between the Self-Efficacy subscales and other personality measures (i.e., Locus of Control, Personal Control, Social Desirability, Ego Strength, Interpersonal Competence, and Self-Esteem) provided evidence of construct validity. Positive relationships between the Self-Efficacy Scale and vocational, educational, and military success established criterion validity. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Several objectively scored measures of fear of success and fear of failure have been designed in recent years, but there is little evidence that they measure 2 distinct, unidimensional constructs. The present study was undertaken primarily to determine if fear of success and fear of failure are operationally distinct and if all fear of success measures tap a single unidimensional construct. Eight Fear of Success and Fear of Failure scales (e.g., Sarason's Test Anxiety Scale and Alpert-Haber Achievement Anxiety Test) were administered to 415 male and female undergraduates, and the scores were intercorrelated. Results indicate that fear of success is not a unidimensional construct and that some of the measures of fear of success and fear of failure are highly related. Next, each scale was factor analyzed, and 37 new variables were created. These were in turn factor analyzed, and 5 highly stable orthogonal factors were obtained. One of these factors appears to be fear of success; another is clearly test anxiety (called fear of failure in the literature on achievement motivation). A 3rd factor is concerned with sex-role-related attitudes toward success in medical school. A 4th seems to reflect neurotic insecurity, and the 5th has to do with the value of success. Indices of psychological well-being and psychosomatic illness related differently to each of the 5 factors. Implications and further questions are discussed briefly. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Five mixed-sex groups of 12 undergraduate students each were administered the following instruments in the order determined by a 1-step cyclic permutation of a standard Latin square: the empirically derived fantasy-based measure of fear of success by M. S. Horner et al (unpublished manuscript), M. Pappo's (unpublished dissertation) fear of success questionnaire, M. Zuckerman and S. N. Allison's (see record 1976-29017-001) fear of success measure, the debilitating anxiety scale of R. Alpert and R. N. Haber's (1960) achievement anxiety test, and R. Birney and colleagues' (1969) hostile press. Statistical relations between measures were examined by using a multitrait-multimethod matrix. Results show that males and females were higher in fear of failure and in fear of success measured projectively, and females were lower in fear of success measured objectively, than the respective normative groups. Findings suggest a lack of convergent validity among both the measures of fear of success and those of fear of failure as well as a lack of discriminant validity between the measures of the 2 personality constructs. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
Article
The present study tested the posited structural path of influence through which perceived self-efficacy of affect regulation operates in concert with perceived interpersonal self-efficacy to determine prosocial behavior, which in turn influences satisfaction with life in four age groups. A strong sense of efficacy in the regulation of positive and negative affect was associated with a high perceived efficacy in the management of social relationships and in empathic engagement in others' emotional experiences. Interpersonal self-efficacy directly affected prosocial behavior and entirely mediated the influence of affective self-efficacy on it. As predicted, prosocial behavior directly influenced life satisfaction, showing a higher path of influence for the oldest group as compared to the other ones. The structural model provided a better fit for the data than did alternative models.
Article
ABSTRACT There are two traditional explanations for success-avoiding behavior the motive hypothesis and the cognition hypothesis A third hypothesis, compromise, is proposed m this article and explains success avoidance as a compromise between achievement and other goals A review shows that data explained by the motive hypothesis can be explained more parsimoniously by the compromise hypothesis, that some data are weakly inconsistent with the motive hypothesis, and that there is supportive evidence for the cognition and compromise hypotheses The implications of the compromise hypothesis for motivation research in general are discussed in terms of a control theory framework Compromises may be a common feature of intentional behavior