ResearchPDF Available

"Bremer Rechtschreibforscher*innen": Gesamtbericht über Intention, Ablauf und Ergebnisse der Erprobung 2017/2018

Authors:

Abstract

Spelling conversations are a format of work in which students regularly reflect together on the spelling of complex words. In these conversations it should be clarified step by step why the word in question has to be written like this and not differently in orthography. In the course of the current evaluation of these spelling conversations in our project in Bremen (cf. Brinkmann/Brügelmann 2018), almost 600 children in 34 third grade classes took part in one to three such conversations per week over half a school year. A poster with (thumb)rules for spelling was used to clarify and explain common spellings. Before and after the project phase, the children's spelling performance was measured with the Hamburg Writing Test for Third Grades (HSP3), whose standard sample served as a virtual comparison group. A summary of the most important results: - With a jump from an average of 160 to 171 of 191 correct graphemes between autumn 2017 and spring 2018, the classes improved far above average compared to the HSP3 standard sample: - The average increase in correct graphemic of + 6 percentage points and an effect size of 1.1 means a twice as high learning gain of the experimental group compared to a group of the HSP3 standardization sample comparable in orthographic comptence at the beginning. - Especially children in the lower performance ranges profited from the spelling conversations: Within six months, this group made progress that would normally only have been expected after more than one school year, given this low starting level. Other more complex support programmes, which (a) were used in addition to class lessons, (b) with more time and (c) in smaller groups, generally do not achieve a higher increase.
A preview of the PDF is not available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
When a meta-analysis on results from experimental studies is conducted, differences in the study design must be taken into consideration. A method for combining results across independent-groups and repeated measures designs is described, and the conditions under which such an analysis is appropriate are discussed. Combining results across designs requires that (a) all effect sizes be transformed into a common metric, (b) effect sizes from each design estimate the same treatment effect, and (c) meta-analysis procedures use design-specific estimates of sampling variance to reflect the precision of the effect size estimates.
Article
Previous research has recommended several measures of effect size for studies with repeated measurements in both treatment and control groups. Three alternate effect size estimates were compared in terms of bias, precision, and robustness to heterogeneity of variance. The results favored an effect size based on the mean pre-post change in the treatment group minus the mean pre-post change in the control group, divided by the pooled pretest standard deviation.
Farrat da war nichz Schwirich
  • E Brinkmann
Brinkmann, E. (2003): "Farrat da war nichz Schwirich...": In: Brinkmann u. a. (2003, 147-154).
Wie können Anfänger lernen, was Könner nicht wissen? Zur Bedeutung impliziten Wissens und inzidentellen Lernens für den (Schrift-)Spracherwerb und seine Förderung
  • E Brinkmann
  • H Brügelmann
Brinkmann, E./ Brügelmann, H. (2018): Wie können Anfänger lernen, was Könner nicht wissen? Zur Bedeutung impliziten Wissens und inzidentellen Lernens für den (Schrift-)Spracherwerb und seine Förderung. In: Gutzmann u. a. (2018, im Druck).
Evaluation des Lese-und Rechtschreibförderprogramms der Berliner Lehrinstitute für Orthographie und Schreibtechnik (LOS)
  • G Esser
Esser, G. (2008): Evaluation des Lese-und Rechtschreibförderprogramms der Berliner Lehrinstitute für Orthographie und Schreibtechnik (LOS). Teil I. Universität: Potsdam.
Undermining inclusion? A critical reading of response to intervention (RTI)
  • B Ferri
Ferri, B. (2011): Undermining inclusion? A critical reading of response to intervention (RTI). In: International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17th June, 2011, 1-18, Download unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.638862
  • S Richter
  • H Brügelmann
Richter, S./ Brügelmann, H. (Hrsg.) (1994): Mädchen lernen ANDERS lernen Jungen. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede beim Schriftspracherwerb. DGLS Reihe "Lesen und Schreiben". Libelle: CH Lengwil (2. Auf. 1996).
Mit den Wörtern der Kinder rechtschreiben lernen
  • H Bartnitzky
Bartnitzky, H. (2015): Mit den Wörtern der Kinder rechtschreiben lernen. In: Brinkmann (2015, 25-34).
Richtig schreiben lernen nach dem Spracherfahrungsansatz
  • E Brinkmann
Brinkmann, E. (2105b): Richtig schreiben lernen nach dem Spracherfahrungsansatz. In: Brinkmann (2015a, 44-53).