Technical ReportPDF Available

Top Marine Beach Litter Items in Europe A review and synthesis based on beach litter data

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Reducing litter in the coastal and marine environment is a major and prior challenge to preserve biota, ecosystems, as well as goods and services that humans derive from seas and oceans. The identification of the most abundant beach litter items, the so-called Top Marine Litter Items, is a matter of concern for the MSFD, the upcoming EU Plastics Strategy and in general for the prioritisation of measures against marine litter. Specific measures are needed to prevent further inputs and reduce the abundance of litter items. Based on a compiled beach litter data set from 2016, most abundant items on EU beaches have been identified. The quantification of items through beach litter monitoring enables a ranking of items based on their numerical abundance. While a few studies from Regional Sea Conventions (RSCs), Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and research projects have ranked items by their occurrence on beaches at different spatial scales, there was no EU wide analysis available. The report has been developed by JRC within the TG Marine Litter. It lists an updated compilation of available studies and publications of top item lists. Different calculation methods, leading to different results, have been described and applied on a set of European beach litter data that had been collected within the TG Marine Litter. Data is based on 1-year sampling (2016) and included the outcome from monitoring programs, clean-up campaigns and research projects. Results, also with focus on single use products, have been provided in support to the development of the EU Plastics Strategy. The data analysis involved spatial-temporal data grouping at European, regional and national level, including also seasonal variability of beach litter. A total of 355671 marine litter items have been recorded during 679 surveys on 276 European beaches. Furthermore the report gives a brief outlook on the potential consideration of risk-related item properties, leading to a prioritization based on potential harm. The report should provide information in order to develop and implement most efficient measures against marine litter.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... It is defined as any anthropogenic, persistent, manufactured, or processed solid material that has been deliberately or accidentally introduced into the marine and coastal environment [5]. While it encompasses a wide range of materials such as metal, glass, and rubber, plastics account for the vast majority [6,7]. Marine litter poses serious threats to marine life, coastal ecosystems, human health, and coastal economic activities [8,9]. ...
... To complete each survey within an 8-9 h day, survey lengths frequently had to be reduced to an average of 50 m or less, despite the efforts of an experienced team of 5-10 people [47]. Large amounts of litter present on beaches can reduce data quality as observers miss (smaller) pieces, leading to a varied reliability of results [7]. In general, observation detail tends to decline as survey length increases [19]. ...
... This study identified plastic as the most common category of litter, aligning with global research that recognizes plastics as the primary contributor to marine and beach pollution [7,69,70]. When cigarette butts were included in the plastic category, as is customary in studies employing comparable beach litter methods to ours, plastics accounted for 80.3% of all observed litter. ...
Article
Full-text available
Marine litter is a critical environmental issue, with beach litter being its most visible indicator. Despite severe pollution on Mediterranean beaches, Tunisia currently lacks a national beach litter monitoring program. To address this gap and support the development of such a program, particularly at pollution hotspots like urban beaches, we conducted a one-year study on six Tunisian beaches. We employed an innovative, accelerated multiple 10 m transect method tailored to highly polluted beaches, focusing on macro-litter (>2.5 cm). This method significantly reduces survey time compared to the standard 100 m approach while maintaining comparable pollution metrics, offering a practical and efficient solution for areas with high litter density. Our findings reveal an average litter density of 1.01 ± 1.08 pieces/m2, with higher pollution in urban areas. Based on the Clean Coast Index (CCI), two beaches were classified as extremely dirty, one as dirty, two as moderately clean, and one as clean. Plastics (59.2%) and cigarette butts (21.1%) were the most prevalent pollutants, with single-use plastics comprising 52.5% ± 5.3% of total litter. Most of the litter (60.6%) originated from shoreline activities and poor waste management. These findings underscore the urgent need for a long-term national beach litter monitoring program. The integration of our accelerated transect method would enable efficient, effective surveys on highly polluted beaches, providing critical data to address litter sources and support targeted strategies for mitigating pollution and protecting Tunisia’s coastal ecosystems.
... A consistent definition of micro-, meso-, and macroplastics, particularly in terms of size, is currently lacking [1,7,9]. In many publications, including this one, microplastics are defined as particles with a size or length ranging from 1 µm to As macro-and mesoplastics often serve as the origin of microplastics, it is crucial to systematically examine and analyze the transport and fate of these size groups in the environment [1,16]. Furthermore, the European Union (EU) directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and Council, dated 17 June 2008, calls for the documentation of state descriptions regarding chemicals, sediment contamination, and pollution hotspots [17]. ...
... A high tide line was consistently chosen for sampling. As standardized sampling strategies have not yet been established, various publications were consulted for guidance [16,37,44]. Sampling was conducted along a total of 14 beach sections, each with five sampling sites arranged in a transect [45]. ...
... Additionally, the starting and ending points of each transect were identified before sampling commenced, and Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates were recorded. Each transect spanned 100 m and ran parallel to the high tide line [16,46]. A sample was collected every 25 m, marked by a 0.25 m 2 square at each sampling site. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pollution with anthropogenic waste, particularly persistent plastic, has now reached every remote corner of the world. The French Atlantic coast, given its extensive coastline, is particularly affected. To gain an overview of current plastic pollution, this study examined a stretch of 250 km along the Silver Coast of France. Sampling was conducted at a total of 14 beach sections, each with five sampling sites in a transect. At each collection site, a square of 0.25 m2 was marked. The top 5 cm of beach sediment was collected and sieved on-site using an analysis sieve (mesh size 1 mm), resulting in a total of approximately 0.8 m3 of sediment, corresponding to a total weight of 1300 kg of examined beach sediment. A total of 1972 plastic particles were extracted and analysed using infrared spectroscopy, corresponding to 1.5 particles kg−1 of beach sediment. Pellets (885 particles), polyethylene as the polymer type (1349 particles), and particles in the size range of microplastics (943 particles) were most frequently found. The significant pollution by pellets suggests that the spread of plastic waste is not primarily attributable to tourism (in February/March 2023). The substantial accumulation of meso- and macro-waste (with 863 and 166 particles) also indicates that research focusing on microplastics should be expanded to include these size categories, as microplastics can develop from them over time.
... The abundance of small plastic pieces, such as fragments and polystyrene foam, is a recurring issue on beaches worldwide. These items are consistently found in the top ten of beach litter categories [86,87], reflecting their pervasive nature and the difficulties associated with their management and removal. ...
... Identifying items linked to fishery activities can be challenging because most of them can belong to different categories. For example, items like ropes, strings, and lines cannot always be exclusively attributed to fisheries, complicating the accurate estimation of their contribution to marine litter [87]. Despite these challenges, fishing remains a significant source of plastic debris as highlighted on the west coast of Scotland [91]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study is based on a 10-day survey carried out at seven beaches in March 2023 in El Puerto de Santa María municipality (SW Spain). An amount of 5592 items were collected, with a combined weight of 26 kg. Fresh litter, which refers to litter transported to the shore by marine/coastal processes, accounted for 4634 items weighing 23 kg. The remaining 958 items, weighing 3 kg, were identified as litter deposited by beach visitors. The average total litter recorded during the sampling was 0.40 ± 0.07 items m‒1 with a density of 1.85 ± 0.69 g m‒1. Litter materials were relatively consistent regardless of whether they were stranded by marine processes or discharged by beachgoers. Plastic dominates fresh and deposited litter followed by metal and glass, with minimal contributions of chemicals, organic matter, clothing, rubber, wood, and paper. They were identified 115 items’ categories from the 184 listed in the EU Joint List: 107 for fresh and 75 for deposited litter. Food consumption-related items made up a significant portion of the total debris followed by personal hygiene and care-related and smoking-related litter. The obtained information is very useful to propose sound management actions that have to be especially devoted to raise beach users’ responsibility. Last, in order to have a year-round view of litter characteristics and behavior, further investigations should be carried out during winter, when the number of visitors is very low and waves’ energy is high, and summer, when opposite conditions are recorded.
... It is found in different size classes such as micro-litter (< 5 mm), meso-litter (5-25 mm), and macro-litter (> 25 mm) (JRC, 2011). Regardless of time and place, plastic represents the vast majority of all marine litter (Reisser et al., 2013;Addamo et al., 2017;European Commission 2018) and it is found all over the world, from urban beaches to the remotest corners of the oceans (Pham et al., 2014). ...
... Artificial polymers were the most common litter category found, regardless of country, season, or survey campaign. This reflects the global trend of plastics as the main contributor to marine and beach litter, as shown in other studies (Addamo et al., 2017 The minimum area per survey is 25 m 2 . The sediment is raked down to a depth of about 5 cm. ...
Article
Full-text available
We conducted surveys of Mediterranean beaches in Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia including 37 macro-litter (> 25 mm) and 41 meso-litter (5–25 mm) assessments. Our study identified key litter items and assessed pollution sources on urban, semi-urban, tourist, and semi-rural beaches. Macro-litter concentration averaged 5032 ± 4919 pieces per 100 m or 1.71 ± 2.28 pieces/m², with higher values observed on urban (mean 2.63 pieces/m² ± 3.03) and tourist (mean 1.23 pieces/m² ± 0.91) beaches. Similarly, urban (mean 9.91 pieces/m² ± 12.70) and tourist beaches (mean 5.32 pieces/m² ± 4.48) revealed elevated levels of meso-litter contamination, particularly in the upper third of the beach, which contained the highest quantities both in terms of number (51%) and weight (50%). 55% of the macro-litter and 35% of the meso-litter originated from human shoreline activities and poor waste management. Given the width of some beaches and their high levels of pollution, the standard 100 m macro-litter approach was impractical. To enable cost-effective, long-term monitoring, we adapted it to a faster 10 m transect approach, which provided reliable data on the top 25 litter items, accounting for 82% of beach pollution. Our Sand Rake method effectively quantified pollution on both cleaned and uncleaned beaches, addressing the often neglected meso-litter size fraction. The high pollution levels, top litter items, and identified sources indicate that beach cleaning alone will not solve the pollution problem. Efforts to raise environmental awareness, enhanced waste management, and law enforcement are needed to improve the situation in a sustainable way.
... More precisely, longline branchlines (3.6 %), trawl nets (3.6 %) and seines are the three most lost FG. On the European scale, it is reported that the average ALDFG was 20 % (10 Kt) of the FG used yearly and 3-20 % in the number of waste items collected on beaches of the Atlantic and North Sea [1,21,52,90]. Therefore, FG contribute significantly to the pollution of aquatic environments and are a major threat to flora, fauna and marine habitats due to the well-known phenomenon of ghost fishing [32,64,70]. ...
... Beach litter monitoring is a cost-effective method that can be supported by trained citizen scientists and provide valuable input towards a range of policy efforts (Addamo et al., 2017;Binetti et al., 2020;Hanke et al., 2019). This monitoring programme approach utilised competent academics and trained citizens as part of a strategy to progress local marine litter specialists. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study provides the first investigation into quantities, types, and potential sources of anthropogenic beach litter in Sierra Leone. Beach litter surveys were conducted monthly at four sites over 11 months. A total of 72,901 litter items (1,246 kg dry weight) were categorised. Across all sites, an average of 1,657 items per 100 m (SD = 1,639) and 28.32 kg per 100 m (SD = 37.48) were recorded. Plastics accounted for 70% of the litter by count and 49% by weight. The three most abundant items by count were plastic bottles (25%), plastic caps and lids (13%), and plastic water sachets (12%). By weight, the three most abundant items were plastic bottles (36%), flip-flops (20%), and shoes (9%). Litter amounts decreased from wet to dry season. We provide the following policy recommendations: improving drinking water access and sanitation, waste management, infrastructure and behaviour change.
... All types of plastics are found in the oceans. From beach litter surveys and clean-up campaigns, lists of the most common plastic items have been compiled 29 , which provide a good overview of the most common types of plastics found in the aquatic environment. The polymer with the highest relative abundance in the aquatic environment (including, freshwater systems and coastlines) is polyethylene (as high-density or low-density polyethylene, HDPE or LDPE), followed by polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) 17,30,31 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Remote sensing technologies have the potential to support monitoring of floating plastic litter in aquatic environments. An experimental campaign was carried out in a large-scale hydrodynamic test facility to explore the detectability of floating plastics in ocean waves, comparing and contrasting different microwave and optical remote sensing technologies. The extensive experiments revealed that detection of plastics was feasible with microwave measurement techniques using X and Ku-bands with VV polarization at a plastic threshold concentration of 1 item/m² or 1–10 g/m². The optical measurements further revealed that spectral and polarization properties in the visible and infrared spectrum had diagnostic information unique to the floating plastics. This assessment presents a crucial step towards enabling the detection of aquatic plastics using advanced remote sensing technologies. We demonstrate that remote sensing has the potential for global targeting of plastic litter hotspots, which is needed for supporting effective clean-up efforts and scientific evidence-based policy making.
... Plastic was always the dominant material, confirming a global trend [60,61]. It is also worth noting that many of the encountered categories aligned with previous research conducted along the coast of different European countries [62], in the province of Cadiz, Spain [36], in continental Portugal and in the Azores Islands [63], among others. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the spatial and temporal distribution of beach litter accumulation rates at seven sites in Cadiz Bay, Southwest Spain, during October 2022 (i.e., autumn) and March 2023 (i.e., spring). Beach litter was collected during low tide conditions at the strandline during two series of 10 consecutive daily surveys. The main aim of this paper is to comprehensively analyze the influence of seasonality and hydrodynamic and wind patterns on litter abundance and composition. In October, 4199 items (22.58 kg) were recorded, increasing to 4634 items (22.68 kg) in March. Overall, the average litter abundance remained relatively consistent but notable variations were observed at different beach locations. Plastic litter was the most abundant in the total litter amount with 71.13% and 88.39% in October and March, respectively. Litter categories increased from 90 to 107 from October to March and the top 10 litter categories included cigarette butts (1746 in autumn and 514 in spring), plastic fragments (985 and 339) and plastic packaging (297 and 211). Statistical analyses showed no significant seasonal impact on litter quantities but confirmed seasonal variations in litter types. For instance, cigarette butts were more abundant in October, i.e., in autumn, as they are linked to the intensive use of beaches during the summer period (June–September), while wet wipes were prevalent in March, i.e., in spring, because they are associated with an increase in wastewater and river discharges recorded during the late autumn and winter months (November–February). No clear correlations were found between litter quantity and wave height, but specific patterns emerged at exposed and sheltered beaches. The findings provide valuable insights for optimizing coastal clean-up efforts with customized strategies. Further investigations are needed to fully understand the relationships between litter and environmental factors.
Thesis
Full-text available
O lixo no mar é um problema transfronteiriço, global e de grande visibilidade nos tempos atuais. Para além do debate sobre o impacto do lixo no mar e na biodiversidade, a quantidade de lixo nas redes de pesca se transforma em um problema socioambiental e prejudica o modo de vida dos pescadores artesanais. Os resíduos danificam as redes e as hélices, comprometem a qualidade dos pescados e intensificam o esforço necessário para a pesca. Neste contexto, o presente estudo visa compreender o estado da arte do impacto socioambiental do lixo no mar, com foco na pesca artesanal. A revisão sistemática da literatura revela uma lacuna significativa de pesquisas que analisam o impacto sob uma ótica socioambiental, ressaltando a importância de preencher essa lacuna para embasar políticas públicas mais eficazes em prol de um ambiente marinho limpo e saudável. Entrevistas com os pescadores artesanais de Bertioga e monitoramento de resíduos sólidos durante a área de desembarque pesqueiro revelaram que os pescadores reconhecem o lixo no mar como uma ameaça, destacando a responsabilidade do poder público e da autorresponsabilidade para mitigar o problema. A retirada de 569,34 kg de lixo das redes de arrasto, com predominância de plásticos, ressalta a urgência no combate à poluição plástica marinha, enfatizando o papel ativo dos pescadores. Dentre os resíduos plásticos mais encontrados, destacou-­se o plástico de uso único. A identificação de resíduos de marcas conhecidas aponta para a responsabilidade das indústrias na gestão sustentável, enfatizando a necessidade de uma governança abrangente. Para os pescadores, o lixo no mar não representa apenas uma preocupação ambiental, mas também prejuízos financeiros, destacando a importância de abordagens integradas para preservar os ecossistemas marinhos e sustentar as comunidades costeiras. A solução passa pela integração de diversos atores, governança multinível e abordagens transdisciplinares na formulação de políticas públicas. English Marine litter sea is a cross­border, global problem with high visibility in current times. Beyond the debate about the impact of marine litter on biodiversity, the amount of waste in fishing nets becomes a socio­environmental issue and harms the livelihoods of artisanal fishermen. The litter damages the nets and propellers, compromises the quality of the catch, and increases the effort required for fishing. In this context, this study aims to understand the state of the art of the socio­environmental impact of marine litter, with a focus on artisanal fishing. A systematic literature review reveals a significant research gap analyzing the impact from a socio­environmental perspective, emphasizing the importance of filling this gap to support more effective public policies for a clean and healthy marine environment. Interviews with artisanal fisherman and monitoring of solid waste during the fishing landing area revealed that fishermen recognize marine litter as a threat, highlighting the responsibility of the government and self­responsibility to mitigate the problem. The removal of 569.34 kg of litter from nets, mainly plastics, underscores the urgency in combating marine plastic pollution, emphasizing the active role of fishermen. Among the most found plastic waste, single­use plastic stood out. The identification of waste from recognized brands points to the responsibility of industries in sustainable management, emphasizing the need for comprehensive governance. For fishermen, marine litter represents not only an environmental concern but also financial losses, highlighting the importance of integrated approaches to preserve marine ecosystems and sustain coastal communities. The solution requires the integration of various actors, multi­level governance, and transdisciplinary approaches in formulating public policies.
Preprint
Full-text available
Millions of people worldwide rely on disposable sanitary pads, but the high concentration of fossil-based polymers in their composition has negative effects on the environment. This includes the impact of extracting raw materials and the disposal of used products. While sustainable alternatives to traditional pads exist, they are not widely adopted due to their low level of commoditization. This makes them less attractive to companies who prioritize high levels of consumption. One promising alternative is the use of biopolymer-based disposable absorbents, particularly polylactic acid, which is derived from corn starch and is biodegradable. This study used the Life Cycle Assessment and found that using sanitary pads made with polyethylene for one year generates impacts about 17 times higher compared to using absorbents made with polylactic acid.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.