Chapter

Non-Participation in Compulsory Procedures of Dispute Settlement: The People’s Republic of China’s Position Paper in the South China Sea Arbitration and Beyond

Authors:
Erik Franckx at Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Erik Franckx
Marco Benatar at Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Marco Benatar
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Erik Franckx and Marco Benatar consider the peculiar backlash in the form of states rejecting the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals (ICs). They discuss how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rejected jurisdiction in the Philippines v PRC arbitration. The authors draw comparisons with how the Russian Federation rejected the jurisdiction of an arbitration panel in the Arctic Sunrise case. But both states participated in the peculiar form of forwarding ‘position papers’. This allows states new modes of influencing the bench without formally participating in the proceedings, argues Franckx and Benatar. This may tempt other states to apply a similar approach. For example, Croatia has presented its views to an arbitration panel in a dispute with Slovenia, despite its non-participation after irregularities by one of the arbitrators. The PRC and the Russian Federation have also issued a joint declaration encouraging non-participation in international legal proceedings.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
International Law and International Institutions: Implications for a Rising China
Article
Full-text available
  • Feb 2016
There is a growing concern that China has become more assertive in its foreign policies. The fear is whether China’s economic growth may translate into modern and effective military advancement. This engenders the critical question of whether China feels comfortable in the current international order, which is defiPed by international law and institutions. This article argues that the Chinese approach to international law and institutions is tightly associated with its evolving attitudes towards them. With its opening-up, China now views multilateralism as a way for the international community to constrain the capriciousness of a superpower, and regards the international institutions simply as power sharing development. However, China’s integration in international institutions represents its attempt to work within international norms to pursue its interests. It also shows China’s effort to hedge against American influence, and signals China’s emergence as an active player in the international arena.
View
The Legal Status of the U-shaped Line in the South China Sea and Its Legal Implications for Sovereignty, Sovereign Rights and Maritime Jurisdiction
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2015
  • Chin J Int Law
The U-shaped line in the South China Sea has been recently challenged in the international community and this challenge reached its climax when the Philippines presented China with a Notification and Statement of Claim under Article 287 and Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention) on 22 January 2013. In its Statement of Claim, the Philippines requests the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal to adjudge and declare that China's maritime claims based on the U-shaped line are contrary to the LOS Convention and invalid. Against this background, this article will analyze the issues concerning the related submissions of the Philippines.
View
following the Philippines suggestion, the Arbitral Tribunal did consult 'academic literature by individuals closely associated with Chinese authorities' in an effort to discern China's position (South China Sea Arbitration
  • Nonetheless
Nonetheless, following the Philippines suggestion, the Arbitral Tribunal did consult 'academic literature by individuals closely associated with Chinese authorities' in an effort to discern China's position (South China Sea Arbitration (n 3) (Merits) para 126).
Position Paper of the Government of the PRC on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration Initiated by the Republic of the Philippines
  • Dec 2014
  • China
China, 'Position Paper of the Government of the PRC on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration Initiated by the Republic of the Philippines' (7 December 2014) <www.fmprc. gov.cn/ mfa_ eng/ zxxx_ 662805/ t1217147.shtml> (accessed 1 September 2016) (2014 Position Paper). 7² See supra (n 64) accompanying text. The PRC did not submit a counter-memorial. 7³ 2014 Position Paper (n 71) para 2. 74 ibid. 75 ibid paras 4-29.
Jurisdiction) para 79. ¹¹¹ ibid (Merits) para 18. ¹¹² ibid 'Press Release' (PCA
  • Feb 2015
Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (n 8) (Jurisdiction) para 79. ¹¹¹ ibid (Merits) para 18. ¹¹² ibid 'Press Release' (PCA, 18 February 2015). ¹¹³ ibid.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation on certain legal issues highlighted by the action of the Arctic Sunrise against Prirazlomnaya platform' (Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2015) <www.mid
  • Sep 2016
  • Russia
Russia, 'The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation on certain legal issues highlighted by the action of the Arctic Sunrise against Prirazlomnaya platform' (Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2015) <www.mid.ru/ en/ web/ guest/ foreign_ policy/ news/ -/ asset_ publisher/ cKNonkJE02Bw/ content/ id/ 1639745> (accessed 1 September 2016).
Zhu Dan, 'China, the International Criminal Court, and International Adjudication
  • Jan 2014
  • 46-56
J Intl L 154; Zhu Dan, 'China, the International Criminal Court, and International Adjudication' (2014) 61 Netherlands Intl L R 43, 46-56;
See also Tommy Koh and Hao Duy Phan
  • Jan 2016
  • 1
Chinese J Global Governance 157, 164-71. See also Tommy Koh and Hao Duy Phan, 'The Asian Way to Settle Disputes' (2016) 1
Prompt Release) <www.itlos.org/ en/ cases/ list-of-cases
  • Sep 2016
  • The
  • Tomimaru' Case
The 'Tomimaru' Case (Japan v Russia) (Prompt Release) <www.itlos.org/ en/ cases/ list-of-cases/ case-no-15/ > (accessed 1 September 2016);
Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v Russia <https:// pcacases
  • Sep 2016
  • Pjsc Cb Privatbank
  • Finance Company Finilon Llc V Russia
PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v Russia <https:// pcacases.com/ web/ view/ 130> (accessed 1 September 2016); (1) Limited Liability Company Lugzor, (2) Limited Liability Company Libset, (3) Limited Liability Company Ukrinterinvest, (4) Public Joint Stock Company DniproAzot, (5) Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v Russia <https:// pcacases.com/ web/ view/ 124> (accessed 1 September 2016);
); (i) Stabil LLC, (ii) Rubenor LLC, (iii) Rustel LLC, (iv) Novel-Estate LLC, (v) PII Kirovograd-Nafta LLC, (vi) Crimea-Petrol LLC, (vii) Pirsan LLC, (viii) Trade-Trust LLC, (ix) Elefteria LLC, (x) VKF Satek LLC,(xi) Stemv Group LLC v Russia
  • Sep 2016
  • Pjsc Ukrnafta V Russia
PJSC Ukrnafta v Russia (n 134) 'Press Release' (PCA, 2 May 2016); (i) Stabil LLC, (ii) Rubenor LLC, (iii) Rustel LLC, (iv) Novel-Estate LLC, (v) PII Kirovograd-Nafta LLC, (vi) Crimea-Petrol LLC, (vii) Pirsan LLC, (viii) Trade-Trust LLC, (ix) Elefteria LLC, (x) VKF Satek LLC,(xi) Stemv Group LLC v Russia (n 134) 'Press Release' (PCA, 2 May 2016);
Limited Liability Company Ukrinterinvest
  • Mar 2016
  • 30
  • Pjsc Cb Privatbank
  • Finance Company Finilon Llc V Russia
PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v Russia (n 134) 'Press Release' (PCA, 30 March 2016); (1) Limited Liability Company Lugzor, (2) Limited Liability Company Libset, (3) Limited Liability Company Ukrinterinvest, (4) Public Joint Stock Company DniproAzot, (5) Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v Russia (n 134);
); (i) Stabil LLC, (ii) Rubenor LLC, (iii) Rustel LLC, (iv) Novel-Estate LLC, (v) PII KirovogradNafta LLC, (vi) Crimea-Petrol LLC, (vii) Pirsan LLC, (viii) Trade-Trust LLC
  • May 2016
  • Pjsc Ukrnafta V Russia
PJSC Ukrnafta v Russia (n 134) 'Press Release' (PCA, 2 May 2016); (i) Stabil LLC, (ii) Rubenor LLC, (iii) Rustel LLC, (iv) Novel-Estate LLC, (v) PII KirovogradNafta LLC, (vi) Crimea-Petrol LLC, (vii) Pirsan LLC, (viii) Trade-Trust LLC, (ix) Elefteria LLC, (x) VKF
¹²7 Eg Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russia) (Merits)
  • Sep 2011
  • L Asian-Pacific J Ocean
Asian-Pacific J Ocean L and Policy 5. ¹²7 Eg Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russia) (Merits) [2011] ICJ Rep 70; The 'Hoshinmaru' Case (Japan v Russia) (Prompt Release) <www.itlos.org/ en/ cases/ list-of-cases/ case-no-14/ > (accessed 1 September 2016);
); (1) Limited Liability Company Lugzor
  • Mar 2016
  • 30
  • Finance Pjsc Cb Privatbank
  • Company Finilon Llc V Russia
PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v Russia (n 134) 'Press Release' (PCA, 30 March 2016); (1) Limited Liability Company Lugzor, (2) Limited Liability Company Libset,
Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v Russia <https:// pcacases.com/ web/ view/ 124>
  • Sep 2016
Public Joint Stock Company DniproAzot, (5) Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v Russia <https:// pcacases.com/ web/ view/ 124> (accessed 1 September 2016);