A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Quality of Life Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Quality of Life Research (2018) 27:3217–3227
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6
Linking thePsychosocial Impact ofAssistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
totheInternational Classification ofFunctioning, Disability,
andHealth
S.Traversoni1· J.Jutai2· C.Fundarò3· S.Salvini3· R.Casale4· A.Giardini1
Accepted: 16 August 2018 / Published online: 21 August 2018
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
Abstract
Purpose Assistive technologies are widely implemented in clinical and research settings. Despite their dissemination, the
psychosocial impact of their adoption still deserves further consideration. The aim of the present study is to determine the
degree of compatibility between the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) and the International Clas-
sification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).
Methods Six health professionals (two neurologists, one neuro-rehabilitation technician, two psychologists, one university
professor of rehabilitation) created a technical board to discuss upon the PIADS–ICF linking. The standardized linking
methodology was applied, and a Delphi technique was used to examine consensus.
Results Five Delphi sessions were required to reach 100% of consensus and to finalize the procedure. Of the 26 PIADS’
items, 23 were linked to an ICF category: 9 items were endorsed at the 3rd ICF level, and 14 items at the 2nd ICF level. Two
items were classified as “not defined” and 1 item as “not covered”.
Conclusion The study highlighted the conceptual connection between the PIADS and the ICF framework and set a bio-
psychosocial standpoint by which accounting the role of assistive devices in rehabilitation settings.
Keywords International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health· Psychosocial impact· Assistive devices·
Health-Related Quality of Life· Rehabilitation
Abbreviations
ICF International Classification of Functioning, Dis-
ability, and Health
PIADS Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale
HRQoL Health-Related Quality of Life
Introduction
Compatibility of measures represents one of the major chal-
lenges in clinical practice and research [1, 2]. A brief but
effective communication among healthcare-professionals,
the comprehensive dissemination of a standardized unified
language, as well as the application of a consistent, shared,
and operational paradigm are essential for efficiency and
quality treatment in healthcare settings [3]. The statement
is pivotal within rehabilitation contexts, as health-care pro-
fessionals constantly need to cooperate in multidisciplinary
teams to accomplish effective care planning [4].
In recent decades, the clinical definition of disability has
been widened [5]. Research studies recognized the impor-
tance of psychological, environmental, and social variables,
emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary and multidi-
mensional approach to the matter. With the introduction
of theWHO International Classification of Functioning,
Disability, and Health (ICF), the deterministic approach
which assigns the origin of an impairment exclusively to
organic outputs of an underlying physical disease has been
* A. Giardini
anna.giardini@icsmaugeri.it
1 Psychology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCSS,
Montescano, PV, Italy
2 Interdisciplinary School ofHealth Sciences, University
ofOttawa, Ottawa, Canada
3 Neurophysiopathology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici
Maugeri, IRCSS, Montescano, PV, Italy
4 Department ofAdvanced Technology Rehabilitation
andPain Rehabilitation Unit, Habilita Hospitals & Research,
ZingoniadiCiserano, BG, Italy
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.