ArticlePDF Available

Prologue: Juvenility Inferences of Parental Advance Aging

Authors:
  • IVF World

Abstract

Couples are escalating delay in childbearing to the late 35 s (female), the 40 s (males) and afar. The surmising of this collective and societal transformation on youth constitution and salubriousness has just at present been a spotlight of research. There are distinguished intensified perinatal risks related with expanding maternal age, notwithstanding the way that fatherly age seems to have a presumably predominant adverse impingement on youth well-being. Although the preeminent rate of poor gravidness consequence may contrast from individual to singular point of view, the impingement of postponing childbearing from a general wellbeing perspective cannot be swelled and should be in the pattern of general wellbeing plan for the coming years. Recognizing the part of components and black box, characteristically the maturing of the gametes, and how this change effects on preparation, blastulation lastly the posterity, is an essential and consequent advance as we attempt to help patients outline sound families.
Advances in Reproductive Sciences, 2018, 6, 109-112
http://www.scirp.org/journal/arsci
ISSN Online: 2330-0752
ISSN Print: 2330-0744
DOI:
10.4236/arsci.2018.63009 Aug. 21, 2018 109 Advances in Reproductive Sciences
Prologue: Juvenility Inferences of
Parental Advance Aging
Aamir Javed1*, Stephen Yesudhas1, Divya Agarwal2, Rudradatta Shrotriya3
1Morpheus Life Sciences Pvt Ltd #352, Bengaluru, India
2Ayushman Hospital, Varanasi, India
3Ashok Nagar Society, Mumbai, India
Abstract
Couples are escalating delay in childbearing to the late 35 s (female), the 40
s
(males) and afar. The surmising of this collective and societal transformation
on youth constitution and salubriousness has just at present been a spotlight
of research. There are disting
uished intensified perinatal risks related with
expanding maternal age, notwithstanding the way that fatherly age seems to
have a presumably predominant adverse impingement on youth well-
being.
Although the preeminent rate of poor gravidness consequence ma
y contrast
from individual to singular point of view, the impingement of postponing
childbearing from a general wellbeing perspective cannot be swelled and
should be in the pattern of general wellbeing plan for the coming years. Re-
cognizing the part of components and black box, characteristically the ma-
turing of the gametes, and how this change effects on preparation, blastula-
tion lastly the posterity, is an essential and consequent advance as we attempt
to help patients outline sound families.
Keywords
Advanced Maternal Age, Advanced Paternal Age, Adverse Neonatal Outcome,
Prematurity
1. Introduction
Many authors superscribed the communal and societal delay in childbearing
from the maternal outlook. However, we spotlight on the impingement of pa-
rental age both maternal and paternal on the health of the newborn [1]. Every
one of us who rehearse in the field of barrenness frequently invests divine energy
and exertion pondering how to enhance achievement rates and accomplish
How to cite this paper:
Javed, A., Yesud-
has
, S., Agarwal, D. and Shrotriya, R.
(201
8) Prologue: Juvenility Infe
rences of
Parental Advance A
ging.
Advances in R
e-
productive Sciences
,
6
, 109-112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/arsci.2018.63009
Received:
July 20, 2018
Accepted:
August 18, 2018
Published:
August 21, 2018
Copyright © 201
8 by authors and
Scientific
Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
License (CC BY
4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access
A. Javed et al.
DOI:
10.4236/arsci.2018.63009 110 Advances in Reproductive Sciences
pregnancies and seldom do we lengthen our sight afar the live birth. These pers-
pectives and arrangement will take a gander at the effect of parental maturing on
youth well-being and prosperity and start to understand the potential systems of
an unfavorable impact. The latest National Key Measurements Report [2] re-
commends that parental age has been continuously expanding. Fatherly age for
which specifically regarding neuropsychiatric peril, expanding fatherly age is
proportional with higher youth chance [3].
The science of the oocyte and sperm is moreover extraordinary and may
represent at any rate some of these distinctions [4]. They may likewise recom-
mend potential dangers that require advance cautious long haul perception and
follow-up of youngsters destined for more established guardians. It is outstand-
ing that mitochondria are maternally determined. New systems endorsed in Eu-
rope for medicines of mitochondrial malady have raised moral issues because of
the adjustment in germ-line legacy by substituting benefactor mitochondria for
influenced mitochondria of the hereditary and planned mother [5]. We addi-
tionally realize that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) isn’t equipped for DNA re-
pair and is therefore at more severe danger of getting changes with age. The
current month’s perspectives and surveys segment show a contention for how
expanded maternal age may affect the life expectancy of the kids inferable from
expanded mtDNA changes and the non-Mendelian germ line legacy from the
mother. What’s more, although that the more significant part of chromosomal
aneuploidies get from modifications in oocyte meiosis and, less thus, mitosis;
sperm DNA is additionally subject to nondisjunction, on the grounds that sper-
matogonial undeveloped cells partition for the duration of the life of the male
with replication, and hazard for a blunder, going before every division [6]. Al-
though the cutoff for “fatherly propelled age” isn’t unmistakably characterized,
there is an expansion in hereditary hazard as men age more than 48 [7]. What’s
more, this hazard likely reaches out past the expansion in neuropsychiatric ha-
zard to the posterity.
So how would we guide couples? It is farfetched that the mongrel lease slant in
deferred childbearing will invert. For ladies, the expanded danger of irregular
birth cycle and chromosomal aneuploidy related with expanded age is all around
recorded. Furthermore, instead of men, ladies are conceived with every one of
the eggs they will ever have, and this “pool” is logically exhausted with maturing.
Our capacity to evaluate “ovarian save,” with the utilization of apparatuses, for
example, antral follicle check and hostile to the anti-mullerian hormone, has
enhanced, yet despite everything, we cannot foresee the rate of misfortune for an
individual lady [8]. Ladies are looked with both declining amount and declining
nature of oocytes with maturing [9]. Alongside enhancements in innovation al-
lowing fruitful oocyte cryopreservation, has prompted an emotional increment
in young ladies solidifying oocytes to save ripeness. Albeit early achievement
rates with this innovation give off an impression of being high, the effect of age
on oocyte survival and hereditary ordinariness, and a definitive utilization of
A. Javed et al.
DOI:
10.4236/arsci.2018.63009 111 Advances in Reproductive Sciences
these oocytes, is as yet not known. Be that as it may, even this innovation will
not modify the expanded perinatal dangers related with cutting-edge maternal
age should ladies utilize this “protection strategy” to postpone childbearing into
their 40 s, the same number of the plan to do. It is an occupant upon us as doc-
tors to guide patients concerning these dangers and that the cryopreserved oo-
cytes speak to just potential for progress and not an “infant” in the cooler [10].
Shouldn’t something be said about the dangers related with fatherly maturing?
As found in the present Perspectives and Audits, the hazard for neuropsychiatric
scatters, and hazard for certain chromosomal blunders and a potential relation-
ship with expanded lifetime growth chance, have been related to expanding fa-
therly age [11]. However, the total dangers are still less. In this way, even though
guiding of our couples about these dangers would be fitting, the hazard does not
appear to ascend to the level that would recommend men ought to solidify
sperm at a youthful age exclusively to decrease this hazard. In addition to the
fact that this is likely a bit much, but preferably we have to consider the upkeep
of expanding gamete stockpiling for drawn-out stretches of time. The sugges-
tions for programs, and for the people who cryopreserve, are not little.
2. Conclusion
A synopsis, parental age significantly affects posterity. In any case, so do as nu-
merous such things that men and ladies can do before a pregnancy, amid a
pregnancy, and amid kid raising [12]. Urging patients to keep up a substantial
way of life, to not uncover themselves or their kids to natural toxicants, and to be
“available” amid their youngster’s instruction and life would likely do signifi-
cantly more to enhance general youth prosperity [12]. That being stated, we have
to keep on investigating the fundamental systems of gamete maturing and its
suggestions. Furthermore, we have to take a long haul perspective of “progress”
as we watch over couples looking for our help.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
References
[1] Kenny, L.C., Lavender, T., McNamee, R., O’Neill, S.M., Mills, T. and Khashan, A.S.
(2013) Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Evidence from a
Large Contemporary Cohort.
PLoS One
, 8, e56583.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056583
[2] Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B.E., Osterman, M.J., Curtin, S.C. and Matthews, T.J. (2015)
Births: Final Data for 2013.
National Vital Statistics Reports
, 64, 1-65.
[3] Schimmel, M.S., Bromiker, R., Hammerman, C., Chertman, L., Ioscovich, A., Gra-
novsky-Grisaru, S.,
et al
. (2015) The Effects of Maternal Age and Parity on Maternal
and Neonatal Outcome.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
, 291, 793-798.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3469-0
[4] Balasch, J. and Gratacos, E. (2012) Delayed Childbearing: Effects on Fertility and
A. Javed et al.
DOI:
10.4236/arsci.2018.63009 112 Advances in Reproductive Sciences
the Outcome of Pregnancy.
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
, 24,
187-193. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283517908
[5] Amato, P., Tachibana, M., Sparman, M. and Mitalipov, S. (2014) Three-Parent
in
Vitro
Fertilization: Gene Replacement for the Prevention of Inherited Mitochondri-
al Diseases.
Fertility and Sterility
, 101, 31-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.030
[6] Bayrampour, H. and Heaman, M. (2010) Advanced Maternal Age, and the Risk of
Cesarean Birth: A Systematic Review.
Birth
, 37, 219-226.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00409.x
[7] Kovac, J.R., Addai, J., Smith, R.P., Coward, R.M., Lamb, D.J. and Lipshultz, L.I.
(2013) The Effects of Advanced Paternal Age on Fertility.
Asian Journal of Androl-
ogy
, 15, 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2013.92
[8] Kirz, D.S., Dorchester, W. and Freeman, R.K. (1985) Advanced Maternal Age: The
Mature Gravida.
American Journal of Obstetrics
&
Gynecology
, 152, 7-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80166-6
[9] Blomberg, M., Tyrberg, R.B. and Kjølhede, P. (2014) Impact of Maternal Age on
Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome with Emphasis on Primiparous Adolescents and
Older Women: A Swedish Medical Birth Register Study.
BMJ Open
, 4, e005840.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005840
[10] Başer, E., Seçkin, K.D., Erkilinç, S., Karsli, M.F., Yeral, I.M., Kaymak, O.,
et al
.
(2013) The Impact of Parity on Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by
Advanced Maternal Age.
Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Associa-
tion
, 14, 205-209. https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2013.62347
[11] Shaikh, F., Wagan, F., Jillani, K. and Memon, K. (2012) Pregnancy Outcome at Ma-
ternal Age 40 and Older.
Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health
Sciences
, 11, 139-142.
[12] Wang, Y., Tanbo, T., Åbyholm, T. and Henriksen, T. (2011) The Impact of Ad-
vanced Maternal Age and Parity on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton
Gestations.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
, 284, 31-37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1587-x
... Additionally considers affirming this forecast will persuade doctors, patients, and assurance providers of the advantages and plausibility of e-SET, regardless of whether this system requires extra exchanges and a marginally longer time to pregnancy. A sound singleton conveyance ought to be the objective of all IVF cycles, and this is best accomplished by e-SET [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Notwithstanding the most noteworthy verifiable live birth achievement rates for couples experiencing in vitro fertilization (IVF), there has been a scourge of iatrogenic twin and higher gestation development considered from this treatment. While some expanded peril is natural for the barren populace requiring treatment, the act of multiple embryo transfer adds to these inconveniences and results, particularly concerning its part in higher number pregnancies. Improvement in cryopreservation procedures has permitted conservation of supernumerary embryos for use in future cycles, and refinements in culture frameworks and embryo selection have brought about the transfer of elective single embryos while keeping up positive pregnancy rates. The willful exchange of a single top notch quality elective single embryo transfer e-SET (Blastocyst) has fundamentally lessened the multiple gestation rates and boosted the rate of singleton pregnancy without compromising the global success rates. We acknowledge that in high-risk situations (e.g. previous history of preterm gestation and poor maternal wellbeing), double-embryo transfer (DET) or triple embryo transfer (TET) ought to be disallowed because of unsuitably high perils. Be that as it may, we contend that ordering e-SET for every single young lady can be viewed as an unsatisfactory break of patient self-governance, particularly since DET/TET offers certain ladies money related and social focal points.
Article
Full-text available
OBJECTIVES: This report presents 2013 data on U.S. births according to a wide variety of characteristics. Data are presented for maternal age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, marital status, attendant at birth, method of delivery, period of gestation, birthweight, and plurality. Birth and fertility rates are presented by age, live-birth order, race and Hispanic origin, and marital status. Selected data by mother's state of residence and birth rates by age and race of father also are shown. Trends in fertility patterns and maternal and infant characteristics are described and interpreted. METHODS: Descriptive tabulations of data reported on the birth certificates of the 3.93 million U.S. births that occurred in 2013 are presented. RESULTS: A total of 3,932,181 births were registered in the United States in 2013, down less than 1% from 2012. The general fertility rate declined to 62.5 per 1,000 women aged 15-44. The teen birth rate fell 10%, to 26.5 per 1,000 women aged 15-19. Birth rates declined for women in their 20s and increased for most age groups of women aged 30 and over. The total fertility rate (estimated number of births over a woman's lifetime) declined 1% to 1,857.5 per 1,000 women. Measures of unmarried childbearing were down in 2013 from 2012. The cesarean delivery rate declined to 32.7%. The preterm birth rate declined for the seventh straight year to 11.39%, but the low birthweight rate was essentially unchanged at 8.02%. The twin birth rate rose 2% to 33.7 per 1,000 births; the triplet and higher-order multiple birth rate dropped 4% to 119.5 per 100,000 total births.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To evaluate the associations between maternal age and obstetric and neonatal outcomes in primiparous women with emphasis on teenagers and older women. Design A population-based cohort study. Setting The Swedish Medical Birth Register. Participants Primiparous women with singleton births from 1992 through 2010 (N=798 674) were divided into seven age groups: <17 years, 17–19 years and an additional five 5-year classes. The reference group consisted of the women aged 25–29 years. Primary outcome Obstetric and neonatal outcome. Results The teenager groups had significantly more vaginal births (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.04 (1.79 to 2.32) and 1.95 (1.88 to 2.02) for age <17 years and 17–19 years, respectively); fewer caesarean sections (aOR 0.57 (0.48 to 0.67) and 0.55 (0.53 to 0.58)), and instrumental vaginal births (aOR 0.43 (0.36 to 0.52) and 0.50 (0.48 to 0.53)) compared with the reference group. The opposite was found among older women reaching a fourfold increased OR for caesarean section. The teenagers showed no increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome but presented an increased risk of prematurity <32 weeks (aOR 1.66 (1.10 to 2.51) and 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38)). Women with advancing age (≥30 years) revealed significantly increased risk of prematurity, perineal lacerations, preeclampsia, abruption, placenta previa, postpartum haemorrhage and unfavourable neonatal outcomes compared with the reference group. Conclusions For clinicians counselling young women it is of importance to highlight the obstetrically positive consequences that fewer maternal complications and favourable neonatal outcomes are expected. The results imply that there is a need for individualising antenatal surveillance programmes and obstetric care based on age grouping in order to attempt to improve the outcomes in the age groups with less favourable obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Such changes in surveillance programmes and obstetric interventions need to be evaluated in further studies.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of parity on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by advanced maternal age. A total of 11 587 pregnancies were reviewed retrospectively from patient medical records. Singleton pregnancies greater than 24 weeks of gestation were included. The study group consisted of women ≥40 years old at the time of delivery, and the control group consisted of women aged between 20 and 30 years old. Data regarding age, parity, gestational age, mode of delivery, and obstetric and neonatal complications were collected. Firstly, pregnancies ≥40 years and the younger control group were compared altogether with respect to the obstetric and neonatal complications. Secondly, both groups were divided into subgroups according to parity, and a second comparison was made with controls. Mean maternal age in the study and control groups was 43±2.2 and 24±2.8 years, respectively. In women ≥40 years old, all of the investigated obstetric and neonatal complications except postpartum haemorrhage and foetal malformations were higher when compared to younger controls (p<0.05). In the nulliparous ≥40 year old group, the most significant complications were preterm delivery (45.3%), low 5-minute Apgar score (15.2%), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (15.2%). On the other hand, in the multiparous group, preeclampsia (16.6%), abruptio placentae (5.1%), foetal demise (7.2%), and macrosomia (9.6%) were found to be significantly higher when compared to controls. The study suggests that pregnancies of maternal age ≥40 years carry increased risks for both neonatal and obstetric complications, and these risks seem to be effected by parity.
Article
Full-text available
Background Recent decades have witnessed an increase in mean maternal age at childbirth in most high-resourced countries. Advanced maternal age has been associated with several adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Although there are many studies on this topic, data from large contemporary population-based cohorts that controls for demographic variables known to influence perinatal outcomes is limited. Methods We performed a population-based cohort study using data on all singleton births in 2004–2008 from the North Western Perinatal Survey based at The University of Manchester, UK. We compared pregnancy outcomes in women aged 30–34, 35–39 and ≥40 years with women aged 20–29 years using log-linear binomial regression. Models were adjusted for parity, ethnicity, social deprivation score and body mass index. Results The final study cohort consisted of 215,344 births; 122,307 mothers (54.19%) were aged 20–29 years, 62,371(27.63%) were aged 30–34 years, 33,966(15.05%) were aged 35–39 years and 7,066(3.13%) were aged ≥40 years. Women aged 40+ at delivery were at increased risk of stillbirth (RR = 1.83, [95% CI 1.37–2.43]), pre-term (RR = 1.25, [95% CI: 1.14–1.36]) and very pre-term birth (RR = 1.29, [95% CI:1.08–1.55]), Macrosomia (RR = 1.31, [95% CI: 1.12–1.54]), extremely large for gestational age (RR = 1.40, [95% CI: 1.25–1.58]) and Caesarean delivery (RR = 1.83, [95% CI: 1.77–1.90]). Conclusions Advanced maternal age is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These risks are independent of parity and remain after adjusting for the ameliorating effects of higher socioeconomic status. The data from this large contemporary cohort will be of interest to healthcare providers and women and will facilitate evidence based counselling of older expectant mothers.
Article
Full-text available
To investigate the effect of advanced maternal age (AMA) separately in nulliparous and multiparous women on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. A historical cohort study on data from 6,619 singleton pregnancies between 2004 and May 2007 was performed. AMA was defined as 35 years and older. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in AMA versus women younger than 35 years (non-AMA) were compared for both nulli- and multiparae with Student's t-test and Chi-square test in univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent effect of AMA. Out of 6,619 singleton pregnancies, the frequency of nulliparity was 42.7 and 33.4% of the parturients were of AMA. Among nulliparous women, AMA was significantly associated with a higher frequency of caesarean section both before labour (OR 2.26 with 95% CI 1.74-2.94), in labour (OR 1.44 with 95% CI 1.07-1.93), and more instrumental vaginal deliveries (ORs 1.49 with 95% CI 1.13-1.96). Among multiparous women, AMA was only significantly associated with a higher caesarean section rate before labour (ORs 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.69). There were no significant differences between the two age groups in the prevalence of other adverse obstetric outcomes and adverse perinatal outcomes. Operative delivery is increased in AMA, including caesarean sections, as well as instrumental vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women. In multiparous women, however, only the rate of caesarean section before labour was increased. AMA had no significant effect on other adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes irrespective of parity.
Article
objective: The objective of this study was to compare pregnancy outcome of women aged 40 & above with those of 20- 30 year. study design: Cross-sectional and comparative study. setting: Department of obstetrics& Gynecology Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences Nawabshah. duration: From 1st July 2011 to 31st Dec 2011. material & method: Consecutive 100 cases of women aged 40 & above and 100 cases of women aged between 20-30 years were included in the study, and labeled as group a & b respectively. All patients were under gone general & physical examination & routine laboratories tests. The biological effects of age on the pregnancy out come were observed, & results were tabulated. result: The mean age for case group was 41.56 ± 2.06 & that for control group 25 ± 2 years. Among the maternal complication of increased maternal age were abortion in early half & pre-term labor in second half of pregnancy (10%) & (12%) respectively. Hypertension (14%) & Diabetes (9%) were more common than in younger age group. Risk of fetal malformation (11%) was also three fold more than younger group (2%). Increased rate of c- section (6%) was seen more with advanced maternal age with high parity. conclusion: The advanced maternal age is candidate with high risk of maternal & perinatal morbidity &mortality. Appropriate management can be formulated to ensure better maternal & fetal outcome during pregnancy.
Article
Purpose Delayed childbearing is increasingly common; hence, concerns emerge regarding potential for additional risks of delivery at advanced maternal age (AMA; ≥35 years). In this study, we sought to assess impact of AMA and parity on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods In this retrospective single-center study (July 2005 to October 2011), we compared spontaneously-conceived singleton births of AMA mothers with spontaneously-conceived singletons of mothers aged 24–27 years. Maternal outcomes: incidence of diabetes, hypertension, and emergency cesarean sections (ECS). Neonatal outcomes: prematurity, birth weight, incidence of small or large for gestational age infants (SGA/LGA, respectively), low birth weight (LBW), and 5′-Apgar scores. Sub-groupings of maternal age were 35–38, 39–42, or 43–47 years; prematurity as
Article
The exchange of nuclear genetic material between oocytes and embryos offers a novel reproductive option for the prevention of inherited mitochondrial diseases. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been recognized as a significant cause of a number of serious multiorgan diseases. Tissues with a high metabolic demand, such as brain, heart, muscle, and central nervous system, are often affected. Mitochondrial disease can be due to mutations in mitochondrial DNA or in nuclear genes involved in mitochondrial function. There is no curative treatment for patients with mitochondrial disease. Given the lack of treatments and the limitations of prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis, attention has focused on prevention of transmission of mitochondrial disease through germline gene replacement therapy. Because mitochondrial DNA is strictly maternally inherited, two approaches have been proposed. In the first, the nuclear genome from the pronuclear stage zygote of an affected woman is transferred to an enucleated donor zygote. A second technique involves transfer of the metaphase II spindle from the unfertilized oocyte of an affected woman to an enucleated donor oocyte. Our group recently reported successful spindle transfer between human oocytes, resulting in blastocyst development and embryonic stem cell derivation, with very low levels of heteroplasmy. In this review we summarize these novel assisted reproductive techniques and their use to prevent transmission of mitochondrial disorders. The promises and challenges are discussed, focusing on their potential clinical application.
Article
Modern societal pressures and expectations over the past several decades have resulted in the tendency for couples to delay conception. While women experience a notable decrease in oocyte production in their late thirties, the effect of age on spermatogenesis is less well described. While there are no known limits to the age at which men can father children, the effects of advanced paternal age are incompletely understood. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding advanced paternal age and its implications on semen quality, reproductive success and offspring health. This review will serve as a guide to physicians in counseling men about the decision to delay paternity and the risks involved with conception later in life.Asian Journal of Andrology advance online publication, 5 August 2013; doi:10.1038/aja.2013.92.
Article
The increasing pregnancy rate at advanced maternal age is contemporaneous with the increasing rate of cesarean birth. Several studies have found that advanced maternal age is a risk factor for cesarean birth. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the relationship between advanced maternal age and cesarean birth among nulliparous and multiparous women. To identify relevant studies, we searched the literature for articles published from January 1, 1995 to March 1, 2008, using Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL. We also hand-searched the bibliographies of retrieved articles to identify additional related studies. We included all cohort studies and all case-control studies that examined this association in developed countries. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software (5.0) was used to summarize the data. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All studies demonstrated an increased risk of cesarean birth among women at advanced maternal age compared with younger women, for both nulliparas and multiparas (relative risk varied from 1.39 to 2.76). Because we found extreme heterogeneity (both statistical and clinical) among the included studies, we did not provide a pooled estimate of the risk of cesarean birth. All included studies illustrated an increased risk of cesarean birth among older women. Fifteen studies adjusted this association for potential confounders, which suggests that a valid and independent association is likely to exist between advanced maternal age and cesarean birth. However, the associated factors for this increased risk are not totally understood in the literature.