ArticlePDF Available

Investigating the relation of Household Food Security Status and some Socio-economic factors with children Intelligence Quotient in 2016 - Mashhad-Iran

Authors:

Abstract

Investigating the relation of Household Food Security Status and some Socio-economic factors with children Intelligence Quotient in 2016 - Mashhad-Iran Abstract Introduction: Food insecurity is one of the categories that has a serious impact on nutritional status. Intelligence quotient is an indicator of one's efficacy. Yet, limited studies have been conducted about food security status and socioeconomic factors associated with children's Intelligence quotient (IQ). The current study aimed to investigate the relationship of household food security status and some socioeconomic factors with children Intelligence quotient (IQ) in Mashhad. Materials&Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 18-item USDA food security questionnaire, 200 children in the food secure group and 200 children in the food insecure group were included. The members of each group were matched 1 to 1 in terms of age and gender..Children’s age group was 4-6 years old, 18-item Food Security (USDA) and General information Questionnaires were completed through interview with mothers. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative variables with Intelligence quotient (IQ) was determined by Chi-square, T-independent and one-way ANOVA. Results: The mean scores of verbal, performance and total IQs in food insecure group without hunger were respectively 98.75±13.24, 102.94±12.96 and 100.84±11.04, which were lower than mean of children's IQ in the food secure group (p<0.05). Also, there were significant differences between two groups in variables of head of household's occupation, mother's occupation, level of father's education, level of mother's education, the status of housing ownership and the economic situation. Conclusion: Food security is effective on Intelligence quotient (IQ) through its impact on nutrition and as a stress factor that affects the entire family.
www.mums.ac.ir
Medical Journal of Mashhad
University of Medical Sciences
Vol. 60, No.5 P: 691-700
Nov-Dec 2017


-











      

    


      



       


     


Email: NematyM@mums.ac.ir



            
 

 

_ -
 USDA


     USDA     

Chi-Square  T-Independent    ANOVA


              
±±±
  
 
 





 .

 
   

 
        
         
      


-



       


IQ-
 IQ   

  
   








        
        
     

   

      


    


 
      
-

         
          
        


   
       
       

 -


         

       
-




-
          

         
       
USDA
  

    
         

       
   
      
    

   
     


     



     
        
 " ""
"      
  


   
USDA








USDA"
""""
"""""
""""""


        
          





   


WPPSI-R



   
        
   
-
 Spss

 T-Independent 
ANOVA
    ANOVA    
 Turkey
       
   Chi-square  
Mann-witney     
    
 Spearman     
p


 
USDA

         


  ±     
±




 








±

±
P value

±
±


±
±


±
±


±
±


±
±


±
±


±
±


p
















        
        
p

        
  


        
p



±

±

±


±
±
±

±
±
±
*
p





±
±
±

±
±
±

±
±
±
P







±
±
±

±
±
±

±
±
±
P**





±
±
±

±
±
±
P*






±
±
±

±
±
±
P*






±
±
±

±
±
±
P*






±
±
±

±
±
±

±
±
±
P







±
±
±

±
±
±
P*










an
         


         

        
      

       
     
       


          

         
       

          
        

        

       
       

     
        
       
 Alati R 

        

        


      

.
         
     
      
        

        


     
     
       


        


       
        


      
      




-

         
        



1
Daniel W.Belsky

         







References
1. Dastgiri S, Mahboob S, Tutunchi H, Ostadrahimi A. Determinants of food insecurity: a crosssectional
study in Tabriz. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2006; 6:233-9 (Persian).
2. Alimoradi Z, Kazemi F, Estaki T, Mirmiran P. Household food security in Iran: systematic review of
Iranian articles. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2015; 24:63-76.
3. Radimer KL, Olson CM, Campbell CC. Development of indicators to assess hunger. J Nutr 1990;
120:1544-8.
4. Ganapathy S, Duffy SB, Getz C. A framework for understanding food insecurity. California: The Center
for Weight and Health College of Natural Resources University of California at Berkeley; 2005.
5. Karam Soltani Z. The study of association between obesity and food insecurity among primary school
students in Yazd. [PhD Dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University; 2004 (Persian).
6. Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard Jr TJ, Boykin AW, Brody N, Ceci SJ, et al. Intelligence: knowns and
unknowns. Am Psychol 1996; 51:77-101.
7. Jensen AR. The g factor. The science of mental ability. London: Praeger; 1998.
8. Ghaffari J, Abbaskhanian A, Jalili M. Evaluation of intelligence quotient of children with moderate
asthma compared to healthy children in 2011: Sari-Iran. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci 2011; 57:505-11.
9. Karami A. Introduction to testing and psychological tests. Tehran: Psychometrics; 2013 (Persian).
10. Tong S, Baghurst P, Vimpani G, McMichael A. Socioeconomic position, maternal IQ, home
environment and cognitive development. J Pediatr 2007; 151:284-8.
11. Motlagh AR, Safarpour M, Hosseini M, Safarpour M, Safarpour H, Maskooni MD. Intelligence
Quotients and socioeconomic factors. Intl Res J Appl Basic Sci 2013; 7:704-8.
12. Ramesh T, Dorosty Motlagh A, Abdollahi M. Prevalence of household food insecurity in the city of
Shiraz and its association with socio-economic and demographic factors, 2008. Iran J Nutr Sci Food
Technol 2010; 4:53-64 (Persian).
13. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
14. Shahim S. Adaptation and standardization of the Wechsler intelligence scale for children in Shiraz. J
Hum Soc Sci 1993; 7:123-54.
15. Shamloo F, Ghiasvand NM. Assessment of IQ in Ghazvin class 2 primary school students and its
association with familial marriage 1996-1997. J Ghazvin Univ Med Sci 1997; 2:1-9 (Persian).
16. Shafiee HA, Seifi M, Badiee M, Aref D. The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score in patients aged 12-18 yrs.
with dent skeletal malocclusion under orthodontic treatment in Shahid Beheshti Dental School during
2008-2009. J Dent Sch 2012; 30:106-12 (Persian).
17. Kamkar A, Akbartabar Touri M, Fararouee M. Assessment of intelligence status and its relationship with
educational advance in Yasooj class 5 Primary School Students. J Yasooj Univ Med Sci 2001; 6:34-40
(Persian).
18. Breslau N, Chilcoat HD, Susser ES, Matte T, Liang KY, Peterson EL. Stability and change in children's
intelligence quotient scores: a comparison of two socioeconomically disparate communities. Am J
Epidemiol 2001; 154:711-7.
19. Webb KE, Horton NJ, Katz DL. Parental IQ and cognitive development of malnourished Indonesian
children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59:618.
20. Eriksen HL, Kesmodel US, Underbjerg M, Kilburn TR, Bertrand J, Mortensen EL. Predictors of
intelligence at the age of 5: family, pregnancy and birth characteristics, postnatal influences, and
postnatal growth. PloS One 2013; 8:e79200.
21. Alati R, MacLeod J, Hickman M, Sayal K, May M, Smith GD, et al. Intrauterine exposure to alcohol and
tobacco use and childhood IQ: findings from a parental-offspring comparison within the Avon
Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Pediatr Res 2008; 64:659.
22. Choudhary R, Sharma A, Agarwal K, Kumar A, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM. Building for the future:
influence of housing on intelligence quotients of children in an urban slum. Health Policy Plan 2002;
17:420-4.
23. Rose D. Economic determinants and dietary consequences of food insecurity in the United States. J Nutr
1999; 129:517S-20S.
24. Ramey CT, Campbell F. Prevention of developmental retardation in high-risk children. Res Pract Mental
Retard 1977; 1:157-64.
25. Ramey CT, Campbell FA. Compensatory education for disadvantaged children. Sch Rev 1979; 87:171-
89.
26. Ivanovic DM, Leiva BP, Pérez HT, Olivares MG, Dıaz NS, Urrutia MS, et al. Head size and intelligence,
learning, nutritional status and brain development: head, IQ, learning, nutrition and brain.
Neuropsychologia 2004; 42:1118-31.
27. Jyoti DF, Frongillo EA, Jones SJ. Food insecurity affects school children's academic performance,
weight gain, and social skills. J Nutr 2005; 135:2831-9.
28. Drewnowski A, Specter SE. Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin
Nutr 2004; 79:6-16.
29. Cook JT, Frank DA. Food security, poverty, and human development in the United States. Ann N Y
Acad Sci 2008; 1136:193-209.
Original Article
Investigating the relation of Household Food Security Status and some
Socio-economic factors with children Intelligence Quotient in 2016 - Mashhad-Iran
Received:23/10/2017 - Accepted: 22/11/2017
Fatemeh Nejati Salehkhani1
Mohsen Nemati2*
Amir Rezaei Ardani3
Davoud Soleimani4
Maryam Khosravi5
Javad Salehi Fadardi6
Habibollah Esmaily7
1-Master of Science in Ntrition, School of
Medicine, Mashad University of Medical
Sciences, Iran.
2-Associate professor Department of
Nutrition, School of Medicine, Mashad
University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
3-Assistant Professor of Department of
Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Mashad
University of Medical Science, Iran.
4-Ph.D. Nutrition. School of Medicine,
Mashad University of Medical Sciences,
Iran.
5-Assistant Professor Department of
Nutrition, School of Medicine, Mashad
University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
6-Associate Professor of Psychology,
Faculty of Education and Psychology,
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
7-Associate professor Department of
Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Mashad
University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
* Mashhad University of Medical
Sciences (MUMS)
Paradise Daneshgah , Azadi Square
Tel: +98 (0)51 38828556
Email: NematyM@mums.ac.ir
Abstract
Introduction: Food insecurity is one of the categories that has a serious
impact on nutritional status. Intelligence quotient is an indicator of one's
efficacy. Yet, limited studies have been conducted about food security
status and socioeconomic factors associated with children's Intelligence
quotient (IQ). The current study aimed to investigate the relationship of
household food security status and some socioeconomic factors with
children Intelligence quotient (IQ) in Mashhad.
Materials&Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 18-item
USDA food security questionnaire, 200 children in the food secure group
and 200 children in the food insecure group were included. The members
of each group were matched 1 to 1 in terms of age and
gender..Children’s age group was 4-6 years old, 18-item Food Security
(USDA) and General information Questionnaires were completed
through interview with mothers. The relationship between qualitative
and quantitative variables with Intelligence quotient (IQ) was determined
by Chi-square, T-independent and one-way ANOVA.
Results: The mean scores of verbal, performance and total IQs in food
insecure group without hunger were respectively 98.75±13.24,
102.94±12.96 and 100.84±11.04, which were lower than mean of
children's IQ in the food secure group (p<0.05). Also, there were
significant differences between two groups in variables of head of
household's occupation, mother's occupation, level of father's education,
level of mother's education, the status of housing ownership and the
economic situation.
Conclusion: Food security is effective on Intelligence quotient (IQ)
through its impact on nutrition and as a stress factor that affects the
entire family.
Keywords: Intelligence Quotient, Food security, Children
Acknowledgement: There is no conflict of interest.
... Another important factor in ensuring food security in the community is the taste and nutritional knowledge of families in how to allocate funds for the best available food and how food is distributed in the family 19 . This is provided when the per capita food basket of the family is properly selected and prepared, enough for the family members, and cooked properly so that the elements and nutrients reach the cells and organs of the body in a healthy and correct way 20 . In this regard, The FAO reported in a report that to feed the world's 9 billion people by 2050, it must produce twice as much as it currently does and that obstacles such as limited agricultural land, water scarcity, high energy prices, and declining investment must be met considered agricultural research and increased food waste 21 . ...
... knowledge methods (synthesis, formal-logical approaches, induction, deduction, analysis, and system-structural) [8][9][10][11][12][13] , and private, scientific measurescomparative legal, historicallegal, formal-legal and interpretative, in the concept of food security and hygiene and legal problems [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . ...
Article
Full-text available
It's evident that diet affects our health. Sugar, Protein, fat, and nutrients in food supply components for biochemical cycles vital to cellular function. Food chemistry refers to studying the chemical processes and interactions of all biological and nonbiological ingredients of food. Hence, this current study mainly aims to investigate the issues regarding the formation of the concept of food chemistry, nutrition, and health through the prism of the international legal aspect. To meet that aim, many general scientific approaches and methods and scientific knowledge methods, including synthesis, formal-logical approaches, induction, deduction, analysis, and system-structural, and also private scientific measures – comparative legal, historical-legal, formal-legal, and interpretative are used. Based on the results, it is established that the conceptual foundations of national security (a variety of which includes food chemistry) need constant and close scientific understanding since it is impossible to create an effective state program to guarantee the security of individuals, society and the state in various spheres of their life without a solid doctrinal basis. The points of view of the scientists on the research issue presented in the paper allow identifying the main stages of the evolution of the concept of food chemistry and security at the international level in order to determine and characterize the initial stage of the evolution of this phenomenon – the formation stage of the corresponding concept. The periodization of the development of the notion of food chemistry and security offered in the article is on the basis of such measures as legal documents of a strategic and declarative nature that demonstrate the foundations of state policy in the field of ensuring food security and some generalized doctrinal ideas on the analyzed issues adopted in the scientific community in the relevant period.
... Household food insecurity (HFI) has become a major public health concern throughout the world (1). According to the definition of FAO, household food security means that the family has access to a sufficient and diverse amount of safe food to meet the needs of its members for approximately one year; The per capita food basket of the family is correctly selected and prepared and is sufficient for the family members, and the family food is cooked correctly so that healthy elements and nutrients reach the cells and organs of the body (2). ...
Article
Introduction: Household food insecurity (HFI) has become a major public health concern throughout the world. In addition, depression, as one of the main causes of disability, affects 350 million people worldwide. Given that both problems have a high prevalence, we investigated the relationship between depression and household food insecurity in this study.
... erefore, economic status, as a stressor that affects the whole family, can influence IQ through its effect on nutrition. [54] Tavoosi et al. (2005) examined the impact of economic conditions on mathematical abilities of children. e results showed that the accuracy of the answers among children with high economic status was higher than children with low economic status. ...
Article
Background The purpose of present study was to determine and compare food intake in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and healthy children. Materials and Methods In this case-control study, 110 hyperactive children who had referred to Khatam Al-Anbia Clinic and Imam Hussein Psychological Center in Yazd were selected. In addition, for each case, two healthy controls homogenized in terms of age and sexes were enrolled from primary schools in Yazd, from the same urban region of the cases. After completing the general information questionnaires, height and weight were measured. The food intake of individuals was evaluated through a validated food frequency questionnaire comprising 186 items. As for quantitative and categorical variables, the independent t-test and chi-square test were used respectively, and the values were reported as mean and standard deviation. Independent T-test was used to compare food intake between the two groups. Results No significant difference was identified between body mass index and energy intake of the two groups. Hyperactive children proved to have a higher rate of physical activity than non-hyperactive children (p=0.001). Vitamin B12 and riboflavin consumption in hyperactive children proved to be significantly lower than that of the healthy group (p=0.02). Intake of refine grain in the case group was significantly higher compared to the control group (p=0.02). Healthy children consumed fruits and vegetable (p=0.02), low fat milk (p=0.003) and egg (p=0.01) more than children with ADHD. Conclusion The present study revealed that hyperactive children consume less fruit and vegetables, low-fat milk and eggs as well as food sources containing B vitamins while consuming higher levels of refined grains. Future studies such as cohort and interventional types are needed to confirm these results.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Food and nutrition are basic needs of human society. Fulfilling this need lies in concept of food security. There are two main prerequisites for food security in any society: Ensure the availability and accessibility of food in society and ensure the ability of households to obtain food. Household food security means all family members have access to enough food for their minimum amount of necessary requirements.With a systematic review approach, this article wants to investigate the scales, prevalence, contributing factors and consequences of household food security in Iran. Methods and Materials: Proceedings of the Persian writers on household food security without limits of time, place and language publishing was searched thorough informative databases of PubMed, Elsevier , SID, Medlib, Magiran, Iranmedex, Irandoc, Google Scholar using "food security, food insecurity, associated factors, prevalence, causes, women, children and Iran" as search keywords. Findings: Six scales for assessing household food insecurity has been used in Iranian studies.According to various studies, regardless of the scale used, the prevalence of food insecurity was about 20 to 60%; and in female-headed households and low-income communities, 75 and 86% have been reported. Reduce variation in food consumption and intake of essential micro nutrients, poor nutritional status of infants, inconsistent effects on body mass index and weight of children, adolescents, women and men were the studied consequences of food insecurity. Conclusion: Household food security is considered as an indicator of individual and family health which can be measured to help policy makers and other institutions to design, monitor and evaluate programs and interventions. At national and provincial levels, there are good policy and practices in this field .Due to nutritional transition, increased urbanization and demographic changes in Iran, investigating food security status at the individual and family level, influencing social and cultural factors, its consequences, Design, implement and evaluate proper interventions need further consideration by policy makers, government officials and experts in the country.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The relationship between IQ score and malocclusion is a subject that has been the focus of attention in the field of orthodontics. The present study aimed at determining the IQ score of patients with dentoskeletal malocclusions presenting to the Orthodontic Department of Shahid Beheshti Dental School during 2008-2009. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients aged 12-18 yrs. who were receiving orthodontic treatment. A questionnaire was designed containing 3 sections of demographic characteristics, general information and orthodontic treatment. The questionnaire was completed by the patient and senior dental students and patients were asked to take the Cattell Culture Fair III IQ test on the computer and the obtained IQ score was recorded. Data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. Results: The mean IQ score of the understudy population was 98±16. IQ score had a significant correlation with level of education (P<0.001), age (P<0.001) and socioeconomic status (P<0.001). However, type of skeletal malocclusion and facial growth pattern were not correlated with the IQ score. Conclusion: The obtained results showed no association between type of skeletal malocclusion or facial growth pattern and the IQ score.
Article
Full-text available
مقدمه آسم شايعترين بيماري مزمن در كودكان است. ضريب هوشي از شاخصه هاي ارزشيابي ميزان كارائي افراد است. هدف از اين مطالعه مقايسه ضريب هوشي بين بيماران كودك داراي آسم متوسط و كودكان مشابه سالم است. روش كار اين مطالعه مورد-شاهدي در مدت 8 ماه در سال 1390 در كلينيك طوبي شهر ساري انجام شده است. آزمون هوش وكسلر كودكان از طريق دو نيمه كردن براي هوشبهر كلي 97 / ، براي هوشبهر كلامي 97 / و براي هوشبهر ثبت شد. مقايسه ميانگين هاي به دست آمده SPSS عملي 93 / انجام شده است. اطلاعات در برنامه نرم افزاري ازمتغيرها به وسيله آزمون تي انجام گرفت. داده هاي طبقه بندي شده در گروه هاي مختلف سني و هوشي نيز كمتر از 05 / به p توسط آزمون مجذور كاي دو مورد مقايسه قرار گرفتند.در تمام آزمون هاي آماري مقادير عنوان سطح معناداري در نظر گرفته شد. نتايج 44 %) در گروه شاهد قرار / 55 %) در گروه مورد و 90 نفر( 1 / 204 كودك مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند كه 114 نفر ( 9 43 %) از اين كودكان نيز مونث / 56 %) از كودكان مورد مطالعه مذكر و 89 نفر( 6 / داشتند. 115 كودك ( 4 107 بوده است كه / 109 و 5 / بودند.در مجموع نمره هاي هوشبر كلي در بيماران و افراد سالم به ترتيب برابر 2 0). هيچ تفاوت معناداري بين نمرات دو گروه براساس جنسيت و نمرات / تفاوت معني داري نداشته است( 905 هوشبهر طبقه بندي شده وجود ندارد.
Article
Full-text available
Parental education and maternal intelligence are well-known predictors of child IQ. However, the literature regarding other factors that may contribute to individual differences in IQ is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of a number of variables whose predictive status remain unclarified, in a sample of basically healthy children with a low rate of pre- and postnatal complications. 1,782 5-year-old children sampled from the Danish National Birth Cohort (2003-2007) were assessed with a short form of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Revised. Information on parental characteristics, pregnancy and birth factors, postnatal influences, and postnatal growth was collected during pregnancy and at follow-up. A model including study design variables and child's sex explained 7% of the variance in IQ, while parental education and maternal IQ increased the explained variance to 24%. Other predictors were parity, maternal BMI, birth weight, breastfeeding, and the child's head circumference and height at follow-up. These variables, however, only increased the explained variance to 29%. The results suggest that parental education and maternal IQ are major predictors of IQ and should be included routinely in studies of cognitive development. Obstetrical and postnatal factors also predict IQ, but their contribution may be of comparatively limited magnitude.
Article
Full-text available
Presents findings of a task force established by the American Psychological Association to report on the issues of what is known and unknown about intelligence. Significant conceptualizations of intelligence are reviewed, including the psychometric approach, theories of multiple forms of intelligence, cultural variations, theories of developmental progressions, and biological approaches. The meaning of intelligence test scores, what they predict, and how well they predict intelligence is discussed. Genetic factors and intelligence, focusing on individual differences, conventional IQ tests, and other tests intended to measure cognitive ability, are described. Environmental factors such as social and biological variables are discussed, and sex and ethnic group differences are addressed. Recommendations for future research are presented.
Article
The abstract for this document is available on CSA Illumina.To view the Abstract, click the Abstract button above the document title.
Article
A pesar de la relativamente corta historia de la Psicología como ciencia, existen pocos constructos psicológicos que perduren 90 años después de su formulación y que, aún más, continúen plenamente vigentes en la actualidad. El factor «g» es sin duda alguna uno de esos escasos ejemplos y para contrastar su vigencia actual tan sólo hace falta comprobar su lugar de preeminencia en los modelos factoriales de la inteligencia más aceptados en la actualidad, bien como un factor de tercer orden en los modelos jerárquicos o bien identificado con un factor de segundo orden en el modelo del recientemente desaparecido R.B.Cattell.
Article
This study aims to test the hypothesis that moderate maternal alcohol and tobacco use in pregnancy is associated with intelligent quotient (IQ) scores in childhood through intrauterine mechanisms. We conducted parental-offspring comparisons between the associations of tobacco and alcohol consumption with child's IQ in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Analyses were conducted on 4332 participants with complete data on maternal and paternal use of alcohol and tobacco at 18 wk gestation, child's IQ and a range of confounders. IQ was measured at child age 8 with the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III). We used multivariable linear and logistic regression to estimate mean differences and 95% confidence intervals in IQ scores across the exposure categories and computed f statistics to compare maternal and paternal associations. In fully adjusted models, there was no strong statistical evidence that maternal alcohol and tobacco consumption during pregnancy were associated with childhood IQ with any greater magnitude than paternal alcohol and tobacco consumption (also assessed during their partners' pregnancy). Our findings suggest that the relationship between maternal moderate alcohol and tobacco use in early pregnancy and childhood IQ may not be explained by intrauterine mechanisms.