ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

__________________________________________________________ There are several organizational, social and psychological factors that may impede profit-athletes' successful transition out of their salient athletic role set. Consequently, this article summarizes the results of post-athletic surveys and interviews of (n = 17) former National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) profit-athletes from a Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) university. Analyzed data reveal clear evidence of prominence of athletic role set, including normative expectations, athletic role domination, salient athletic identity, and post-eligibility career transition difficulties, regardless of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, degree completion, or sport. The results indicate all participants experienced various degrees of athletic role engulfment, which impacted their overall athlete career transition experience. Researchers discuss implications for sport, specifically the need for proactive programming to address athletic role engulfment to ensure positive athlete career transition experiences.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 2018, 11, 115-141 115
© 2018 College Sport Research Institute
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Profit-Athletes’ Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Victor D. Kidd
University of South Carolina
Richard M. Southall
University of South Carolina
Mark S. Nagel
University of South Carolina
Jerry F. Reynolds II
Louisiana State University
Christian K. Anderson
University of South Carolina
There are several organizational, social and psychological factors that may impede profit-
athletes’ successful transition out of their salient athletic role set. Consequently, this article
summarizes the results of post-athletic surveys and interviews of (n = 17) former National
Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) profit-athletes from a Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS)
university. Analyzed data reveal clear evidence of prominence of athletic role set, including
normative expectations, athletic role domination, salient athletic identity, and post-eligibility
career transition difficulties, regardless of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, degree completion, or
sport. The results indicate all participants experienced various degrees of athletic role
engulfment, which impacted their overall athlete career transition experience. Researchers
discuss implications for sport, specifically the need for proactive programming to address
athletic role engulfment to ensure positive athlete career transition experiences.
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
ecent media accounts of college athlete’s post-athletic transitions have focused on the
difficulties of Black male profit-athletes
in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)
Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) football and NCAA D-I men’s basketball (Chadiha, 2012;
Eisenberg, 2013; LaMonica & Baumbach, 2015). One such high-profile example is Showtime’s
2016 documentary: Running for His Life: The Lawrence Phillips Story that chronicles Phillips’
off-the-field difficulties, which were the result of a combination of parental neglect, impaired
behavioral health, disappearance of social stature, and suicidal ideation. His story personifies a
traumatic post-athletic transition (Briganti & Greenburg, 2016). Sadly, Phillips committed
suicide in 2016 while serving a 31-year prison sentence for felony assault with a deadly weapon
and domestic assault, while facing additional murder charges (Breech, 2016). While stories such
as Phillips’ garner wide-spread attention, most athletes’ transition difficulties are less titillating
and subsequently under-examined (Chadiha, 2012; Eisenberg, 2013; LaMonica & Baumbach,
2015). While most career-transition research has taken place in non-athletic settings, it has
interestingly explored retirement experiences associated with abrupt job terminations similar to
what college athletes (both profit and Olympic-sport athletes) experience (Beamon & Bell, 2011;
Ebberwein, Krieshok, Ulven, & Prosser, 2004; Latack & Dozier, 1986; Marshall, Clarke, &
Ballantyne, 2001; Miller & Buttell, 2018; Navaroo, 2015; Van Der Heijden, Schalk, & Van
Veldhoven, 2008). In addition, while most individuals facing abrupt career transitions are older
(55+) than college or professional athletes, all career transitions occur along a spectrum of
challenges, including: decreased financial stability, diminished physical health, and a lack of
overall life satisfaction (Ebberwein et al., 2004). Confronted with an abrupt forced retirement,
previous research suggests profit-athletes are at heightened risk of experiencing transition
difficulties (Beamon & Bell, 2011; Botterill, 1990; Olgilvie & Howe, 1982; Southall, Eckard,
Nagel, & Randall, 2015; Southall & Weiler, 2014; Werthner & Orlick, 1986; Wooten, 1994)
when they have not explored a variety of career options (Stankovich, Meeker, & Henderson,
2001), lack viable post-athletic professional options (Sinclair & Orlick, 1993), and due to a
lack of social support (Adams, Coffee, & Lavallee, 2015) face personal alienation and
workplace isolation (Coakley, 1986; Frey, 1982; Southall & Weiler, 2014).
Profit-athletes are NCAA college athletes whose estimated market value exceeds the value of
NCAA-approved compensation (i.e., NCAA Bylaw 15.02.2 “A full grant-in-aid is financial aid
that consists of tuition and fees, room and board, and required course-related books.”). While
typically profit athletes are thought of as exclusively high-profile NCAA FBS football and D-I
men’s basketball players, this study’s profit-athlete sample includes baseball players, since the
university baseball program’s average home attendance is among the highest in college baseball,
top baseball recruits are scrutinized and often lionized just as basketball and football athletes,
and it has produced several hundred MLB/MiLB (minor league baseball) players.
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Research Setting
Traditionally, discussions of NCAA profit athletes have centered around discrepancies
between the market value of Power-5 FBS football and D-I men’s basketball players (i.e.,
starters and/or impact players) and the value of a grant-in-aid. However, this study includes
NCAA D-I baseball players in its definition of a profit-athlete for several reasons. First, NCAA
D-I baseball in general has adopted a profit-seeking model consistent Brand’s (2006) call for
FBS athletic departments to conduct revenue-generating activities in a productive and sound
business-like manner (p. 7). In a few specific cases - including at the school from which this
study’s sample was drawn – the revenue-generating activities as well as the marketing and public
relations efforts for the school’s baseball team have created an environment that mimics much of
the landscape of big-time FBS football and basketball. Second, over the past few years, college
baseball fans can watch and listen to a steady diet of regular-season, regional, super-regional,
and College World Series games that are re-presented in a manner consistent with a professional
baseball institutional logic (Southall, Hancock, Cooper & Nagel, 2012). Third, average
attendance for Top-20 college baseball programs rivals that of many minor-league teams
(EerSports, 2017; Baseball America, 2017). Fourth, data reveal that 695 NCAA baseball players
(9.1% of all NCAA baseball players), including 595 from D-I were picked in the 2016 MLB
draft (NCAA, 2017). This total was over 57% of all 2016 MLB draft picks (N = 1,206) (NCAA,
2017). Finally, Power-5 conference baseball player adjusted graduation gaps (AGGs) (-33.4) are
similar to those of Power-5 men’s basketball players (-34.5) (Kidd, Koba, Southall, Eckard &
Nagel, 2017). All these factors giving credence to including Power-5 baseball players as profit
athletes for this study.
Role Theory: Status, Role and Identity
Fundamentally, examining profit-athletes’ post-athletic career transitions involves
studying their movement between their athletic and post-athletic role sets, including disengaging
from one role set (role exit) and engaging in another (role entry) (Ashforth, Kreiner & Fugate,
2000; Richter, 1984). Consequently, we acknowledge the foundational nature of role theory in
our assessment of profit-athletes’ post-athletic transitions (Biddle, 1979; Goffman, 1959). Within
role theory, an individual’s role set (comprised of the interconnected concepts of status, role and
identity) provides an analytical bridge “…between the individual and the social environment”
(Eagly & Wood, 2011, p. 460) across which expectations exist “…in the minds of individuals
and also are shared with other people, producing the social consensus from which social
structure and culture emerge” (Eagly & Wood, 2011, p. 460) (See figure 1 and also Adler &
Adler, 1991; Hogg et al., 1995; Simon, 1992.).
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Figure 1. An individual’s role set.
One of a role set’s three components, status, is an individual’s “position in [an] organized
group or system…related to other positions by a set of normative expectations” (Adler & Adler,
1991, p. 28). Part of a talented athletes’ systemic indoctrination (from middle school, through
high school and as part of the college recruiting process) is the conferring of elite athletic status
from social support system (Adler & Adler, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1991; Southall & Weiler, 2014).
Elite profit-athletes are often granted a gloried self-athletic status, which becomes salient when
they because of repeated direct interactions with the media, fans, and students develop a
campus-wide, local, national and even international celebrity status (Baillie & Danish,1992;
Southall & Weiler, 2014).
This gloried self-athletic status, based on normative expectations and continual
reinforcement, is solidified by interscholastic and intercollegiate social systems into a “realistic”
view of their sport as a means of economic and social upward mobility (Singer, 2008), which
results in profit-athletes coming to view their central role not only as that of a college athlete, but
as a “pre-professional” athlete with varying degrees of revenue generation and celebrity status
(Adler & Adler, 1991; Emmert, 2012). The total institution of interscholastic and intercollegiate
athletics establishes and solidifies profit-athletes’ singular athletic status (Goffman, 1961;
Southall & Weiler, 2014).
Situated within this pre-professional status, profit-athletes have been found to internalize
a singular athletic role (another element of an individual’s role set) and disengage from academic
and social endeavors outside of sport-related capacities (Adler & Adler, 1985, 1987, 1991;
Brewer, Van Raalte, & Linder, 1993; Brown, Glastetter-Fender, & Shelton, 2000; Hogg, Terry,
& White, 1995; Murphy, Petitpas, & Brewer, 1996; Webb, Nasco, Riley, & Headrick, 1998).
Subsequently, this internalized athletic role becomes athletic role engulfment when this
internalized athletic role reaches a level of role domination, or master status (Adler & Adler,
1985; Brewer et al., 1993; Brown et al., 2000; Hogg et al., 1995; Murphy et al., 1996; Stryker,
1987). Athletic role engulfment necessarily requires abandonment of academic and social roles
(Adler & Adler, 1985, 1987, 1991; Hogg et al., 1995). In this situation, Adler and Adler (1991)
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
noted subjects “[p]rogressively detach themselves from their investment in other areas and let go
alternative goals and priorities” (p. 27-28).
Athletic role engulfment manifests itself by profit-athletes projecting a salient athletic
identity (Adler & Adler, 1985, 1987, 1991; Hogg et al., 1995) to others (within and outside of
college sport’s total institutional setting). This may result in their selecting (or have selected for
them) an academic major with minimal rigor, increasingly becoming devoted to athletic
activities and socially isolating themselves from the general student body. The focal point of
these athletes’ collegiate experience is their athletic role set; a student role set becomes not only
tertiary but virtually systemically and psychologically impossible.
In our sport-crazed society, not surprisingly, athletic identity has received a great deal of
attention (Brewer & Petitpas, 2017; Brewer et al,1993; Foster & Huml, 2017; Murphy et al.,
1996; Rasquinha & Cardinal, 2017). Brewer et al. (1993) defined athletic identity as the degree
to which an individual identifies as an athlete, while Callero (1985) and Martin, Eklund, and
Mushett (1997) highlighted the interconnected nature of an athlete’s performance, athletic
identity, and self-esteem. Profit-athletes’ team socialization, may include receipt of athletic
rewards and attainment of social celebrity, and assignment of an athletic role set they “play” out
in their daily lives and by which others identify them (Adler & Adler, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1991).
Athletes may become devoted to their athletic role set, because they “…perceive many of
their important social relationships are predicated on occupancy of that role [identity]” (Hogg et
al., 1995, p. 258). Their devotion or commitment can be categorized as interactional (when a
role is connected with an identity) and affective (the strength of the present role/identity) (Hogg
et al., 1995; Stryker, 1980). Elevating their athletic role set to a position of prominence along the
hierarchy of salience results in athletes fixating on their athletic participation and responsibilities.
When their role set within a social system (e.g., team, campus, and media environments) is
solidified and they view themselves primarily in terms of their internalized athletic role set,
profit-athletes often portray an exacerbated salient athletic identity, the outward manifestation of
severe role engulfment.
Many profit-athletes come to college with the desire to participate in rigorous academic
majors and general student body extracurricular activities. However, the insular nature of big-
time college sport, as well as devotion to their athletic responsibilities, often leads to pragmatic
academic detachment and a resulting lack of non-athletic socialization and educational
opportunities (i.e., eating with the general student body, internship opportunities, and non-
athletic career planning) (Bishop 2013; Southall & Weiler, 2014; Uthman, 2013). Edwards
(2000) contends this situation occurs more frequently among Black male profit-athletes is the
case for several reasons:
(1) a long-standing, widely held, racist, and ill-informed presumption of innate,
race-linked black athletic superiority and intellectual deficiency; (2) media
propaganda portraying sports as a broadly accessible route to black social and
economic mobility; and (3) a lack of comparably visible, high-prestige black
role models beyond the sports arena (p. 9).
Given these factors, as well as parents and family members especially in lower socioeconomic
settings who “…intentionally and intensely socialize Black males into focusing on athletics”
(Southall et al., 2015, p. 398) athletic status, role engulfment and development of a salient
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
athletic identity has been found to be prevalent among Black profit-athletes from lower
socioeconomic backgrounds (Edwards, 2000; Harris, 1994; Hawkins, 2010).
Such intensive role-set socialization may also reflect the awareness on the part of profit-
athletes’ and their families of their substantial market value.
Though compensation-restrictive
NCAA rules prevent elite profit-athletes coming close to maximizing their sport-based income
potential while in school, the existence of an underground economy and future earnings from
potential Major League Baseball (MLB), National Basketball Association (NBA), or National
Football League (NFL) contracts are significant elements that contribute to profit-athletes
adopting an athletic role set, which in many ways can be viewed as a rational labor-market
However, the NCAA and defenders of its collegiate model (Southall & Staurowsky,
2013) question the veracity of such an assumption, contending men’s basketball players
(especially Black players) who are portrayed as among the most role engulfed of all profit-
athletes possess distinct and well-rounded academic and social identities. According to the
NCAA, it’s modern-day collegiate model preserves “…an academic environment in which
acquiring a quality education is the first priority. In the collegiate model of sports, the young men
and women competing on the field or court are students first, athletes second (National
Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA], n.d.). Supporting this perspective, John Calipari
(University of Kentucky’s men’s basketball coach), recently claimed NCAA Division-I men’s
basketball players are in fact focused on academics, receive a quality education, and earn
“…college degrees at historically high rates” (Kruzel, 2018, para. 6). During a January 20, 2018
broadcast of ESPN’s College Gameday, Calipari explained:
I go back to this: We have the highest graduation rate of basketball players in the history
of the NCAA…We have the highest graduation rate of African-American basketball
players in the history of the NCAA in basketball’ (Kruzel, 2018, para. 7).
Questioning these claims, Southall et al. (2015) contend the NCAA’s Graduation Success Rate
(GSR) is institutional propaganda (Southall & Staurowsky, 2013) that glosses over the
disconnect between the business of college sport and seeks to obfuscate the systemic obstacles
that impede profit-athletes from taking advantage of meaningful educational opportunities. Our
study sought to further explore from the perspective of former profit athletes how systematic
forces also influence post-athletic career behavior.
Profit-Athletes’ Career Transitions
Schlossberg (1981) defined a transition as “an event or non-event, which results in a
change in assumptions about oneself and the world and requires a corresponding change in one’s
behavior and relationships” (p. 5). Researchers have examined the post athletic-career transitions
of former elite Olympic athletes, professional tennis players, female gymnasts, soccer players,
and alpine skiers (Erpič, Wylleman, & Zupančič, 2004; Kerr & Dacyshyn, 2000; Knights,
The average “season” market value for an FBS Power-5 player has been estimated at $137, and
$289,031 per season for an NCAA Division-I men’s basketball players (Manfred, 2013). Star
FBS quarterbacks are estimated to be worth an average of $3 million per season (Gitter &
Hunserger, 2014).
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Sherry, & Ruddock-Hudson, 2016; Torregrosa, Boixados, Valiente, & Cruz, 2004; Uberoi,
2015). Kerr and Dacyshyn (2000) examined transition difficulties of female gymnasts, finding
the majority of participants experienced difficult athlete career transitions with distinctive themes
of disorientation, void, and frustration. However, Kerr and Dacyshyn (2000) recognized their
findings failed to identify differences in transition experiences of the gymnasts who retired
voluntarily (e.g., discontinuing participation due to other opportunities or aspirations, or simply
wanting to stop competing) versus those who retired involuntary (e.g., significant injury or
deselection/getting dropped from a team). Erpič et al. (2004) noted this limitation in Kerr and
Dacyshyn’s work in their examination of sport retirement experiences of former Slovene elite
athletes. Their findings strongly suggest transition experiences are significantly different for
voluntary versus involuntary retirees.
Several studies, most notably Adler and Adler (1991), Beamon (2012), Beamon and Bell
(2011), Cummins and O’Boyle (2015), and Wylleman and Reints (2010) found profit-athletes
who focus on high-level sport participation from a very young age often do not have non-sport
career aspirations and are inadequately prepared for successful post-athletic transitions. For
profit-athletes who are unwilling or unable to modify their attitudes and perceptions regarding
alternative career aspirations, transitioning out of college sport can be difficult (Adler & Adler,
1991; Beamon & Bell, 2011). The end of a profit-athlete’s career can be especially challenging if
he has lower academic attainment, insufficient social development, and unsustainable
occupational skills (Adler & Adler, 1991; Chadiha, 2012; Eisenberg, 2013; LaMonica &
Baumbach, 2015).
While profit-athletes may not recognize exhaustion of NCAA eligibility as retirement, as
Coakley (1983) notes, the end of athletic participation has many retirement elements, since it is a
“process of transitioning from participation in competitive sport to another activity or set of
activities” (p.1). In addition, retiring from competitive sport is often abrupt, regardless of
whether it is voluntary or involuntary. For a profit-athlete, the transition from a highly
competitive and visible existence to an uncertain retirement, often devoid of a clear career path,
can be traumatic (Baillie & Danish, 1992; Blinde & Greendorfer, 1985; Stambulova, Alfermann,
Statler, & Cote, 2009).
Murphy, Petitpas, & Brewer (1996) and Beamon (2012) utilized the concept of identity
foreclosure to explain post-athletic career transition difficulties, while Cummins and O’Boyle
(2015) used the human adaption to transition model (Pearson, & Petitpas, 1990; Schlossberg,
1981). These studies, as well as Singer’s (2008) work on the benefits and detriments of athletic
participation among former Black Division I FBS football players, found the combination of
athletic devotion and role engulfment resulted in an imbalance between academic and athletic
roles among profit-athletes. In addition, such imbalances are exacerbated by university athletic
departments that neglect to provide current and former profit-athletes programming to address
resulting athletic career transition difficulties. Consistently, Division-I FBS football and men’s
basketball players have been found to experience difficult post-athletic career transitions, which
negatively affect their quality of life (Beamon, 2012; Beamon & Bell, 2011; Cummins &
O’Boyle, 2015).
Many Beamon and Bell (2011) study participants expressed “feeling depressed and
reported feeling a loss liken [sic] to personal death, the loss of a body part, or the loss of a family
member” (p. 41) and expressed social alienation upon ending formal athletic participation
because of a “loss associated with [no longer] being an athlete” (p. 41). While Beamon and Bell
(2011) found a lack of career preparation hindered former profit-athletes’ transitions, they failed
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
to collect data on other contributing factors, such as parents’ educational attainment levels,
adolescent athletic-role hyper-socialization, or socioeconomic status prior to college enrollment.
Positive Athletic Career Transitions
While Cummins and O’Boyle (2015) proposed conceptual underpinnings for successful
athletic career transition, what constitutes a successful athletic career transition is still somewhat
subjective. However, there have been many attempts to identify attributes of a positive post-
athletic career transition, frame the process, and propose needed resources (Adams et al., 2015;
Lavellee, 2006; Perna, Ahlgren, & Zaichkowsky, 1999; Sinclair & Orlick, 1993; Stankovich et
al., 2001). Adams et al. (2015) examined Scottish athletes experiencing within-career transitions
and suggested the importance of adequate and healthy social support. They also identified four
categories of social support, including: (a) emotional presence of optimistic cheering; (b)
esteem presence of a person or object to provide constant encouragement; (c) informational a
coach or trainer who improves athletic skill; and (d) tangible parent or guardian support
(Adams et al., 2015). Interestingly, sport coaches were essential in providing social support,
suggesting they play a pivotal role in ensuring positive career transitions (Adams et al., 2015).
Sinclair and Orlick (1993) found post-athletic career transitions were more successful
among athletes who retired after achieving self-identified athletic goals (i.e., personal statistics,
winning championships, achieving celebrity status). Those who proactively planned for sport
retirement were also more likely to experience a successful transition. In addition, Stankovich et
al. (2001) reported the success of an implemented proactive program for FBS football players
that focused on identity development, athletic transferable skills, and career exploration. Players
who went through the program were more likely to address their life after sport even if they had
neglected to do so previously.
Knights, Sherry and Ruddock-Hudson (2016) conducted a systemic review of elite post-
athletic career-transitions and assigned the term flourishing to individuals who experienced
successful post-athletic career transitions. Such individuals are optimistic about their life,
experience psychological and social well-being, and perceive their successful transition as
normative (Keyes, 2003; Knights et al., 2016; Stambulova, 2000). Knights et al. (2016) found a
flourishing individual possesses the following attributes: positive emotions, engagement/interest,
meaningful purpose, self-esteem, optimism, resilience, self-determination, and positive
Purpose of the Study
Given that much previous role-set and post-athletic transition research has focused on
Black profit-athletes (Beamon & Bell, 2011; Botterill, 1990; Olgilvie & Howe, 1982; Southall et
al., 2015; Southall & Weiler, 2014; Werthner & Orlick, 1986; Wooten, 1994), this study sought
to extend previous research and in light of NCAA claims profit-athletes are “…focused on
academics” (Kruzel, 2018, para. 6) determine the prevalence of athletic role-set elements: (1)
gloried-self athletic status, (2) athletic role engulfment, and (3) salient athletic identity among
sampled profit-athletes.
Specifically, this study sought to move the discussion away from a focus on profit-
athletes’ ethnicity as a factor in the development of an athletic role set and refocus the narrative
on the interactional and affective elements of profit-athletes’ role set (Hogg et al., 1995; Stryker,
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
1980) within the total institution of big-time college sport. In addition, we examined profit-
athletes’ post-athletic transitions and their ability to successfully disengage/exit from an athletic
role set and engage/enter into a non-athletic one (Ashforth, Kreiner & Fugate, 2000; Richter,
1984). Therefore, we sought to answer two fundamental research questions:
1. Do study participants (regardless of ethnicity and socio-economic status)
articulate the prominence of an athletic role set?
2. Do study participants express post-athletic transition difficulties that stem from
the prominence of their athletic role set?
A socio-demographic survey collected initial data (e.g., years played, academic
achievement, age, race/ethnicity, family educational status, college and high school GPA, and
current occupation) that informed subsequent qualitative inquiry (Charmaz, 2014; Charmaz, &
Belgrave, 2002; Creswell 2007, 2009).
Previous investigations of profit-athletes’ transition challenges have established semi-
structured interviews as a preferred method (Beamon, 2008; Singer, 2008). Therefore, after
completing a survey, each participant took part in an audio-recorded 90-minute (+/-) semi-
structured telephone or in-person interview that explored their post-athletic transition
experiences. Interviews focused on four time periods, during subjects’ athletic careers: (1) pre-
collegiate recruitment, (2) during college, (3) 1st year post-university, and (4) present. In addition
to the four distinct time periods, interviews explored the following domains: (a) social supports,
(b) academic success, (c) “life-skills” development, (d) challenges present during transition
crisis, (e) pre-retirement preparations for transition, (f) factors that assisted in successful
transitions, (g) current occupations, and (h) current life satisfaction.
Open Coding and Triangulation/Crystallization
After interviews were transcribed, member checks were solicited from study participants.
This allowed subjects an opportunity to correct any perceived errors and provide additional
information or clarifications during the respondent validation process. In order to identify themes
across participant interviews, investigators independently coded transcripts using software
Atlas.ti 7. Researchers initiated an open coding process by conducting in-vivo coding of
participants’ transcribed interviews. Conducting in-vivo coding assisted in extraction of themes
by using a participant’s exact language. While experiencing data saturation, to develop themes,
researchers continued the coding process by conducting axial coding (Charmaz, 2014; Khandkar,
2009). Researchers utilized axial coding to re-examine transcribed interviews for theme
generation and clarify information gathered from the in-vivo coding process (Creswell, Hanson,
Plano Clark, & Morales, 2007). Guided by the purpose of the study, investigators aligned
established themes associated with participants’ athletic career transition experiences to elements
of their athletic role set (i.e., status, role and identity) (Charmaz, 2014; Khandkar, 2009).
The use of at least three and sometimes four investigators to review transcribed data
ensured triangulation and strengthened crystallization within the dataset. Jick (1979) stated that
within method triangulation “essentially involves cross-checking for internal consistency or
reliability” (p. 603). Richardson (2000) agreed that a multiplicity of data sources and
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
investigative perspectives is important, but proposed that a triangle, “a rigid, fixed, two-
dimensional object,” (p. 934) is an inadequate view of data and thematic analysis, since there are
often many more than three sides to a story. While a crystal grows, changes and alters, it is not
an amorphous entity. It is a prism “that reflects externalities and refractions within themselves….
What we see depends upon our angle of repose…. [W]e have moved from plane geometry to
light theory, where light can be both waves and particles” (p. 934) at the same time and for two
different observers.
Triangulation and crystallization both deconstruct the notion of validity and within the
postmodernist/constructivist paradigm propose a complex, varied, and thorough data-collection
process. Therefore, we sought to have not only investigator triangulation, but also investigative
crystallization. Consequently, the developed themes are not presented as definitive, nor the only
possible explanations. However, they do provide a multi-faceted prism through which to
examine profit-athletes’ post-athletic transition experiences.
Description of the Sample
This study’s sample (n = 17) consisted of NCAA football, men’s basketball and baseball
players who attended a Southeastern United States Power-5 university between 2003-2013.
Subjects were drawn from an initial university-supplied alumni association database of former
athletes (N = 564), athletic department media guides, and social media platforms. Study
participants were recruited by phone, at athletic alumni association meetings, via social media, or
by recruited subjects who vouched for the researchers’ credibility. The alarmingly low response
rate of 3% was due to the challenging nature of recruiting participants and gaining their trust.
The lack of response to the invitation to participate in the study is a noteworthy finding. Building
credibility and trust involved numerous pre-study informal conversations in a variety of social
settings (e.g., athletic alumni association meetings, tailgating situations, and other informal
settings). The study revealed that gaining gaining trust from within “former athlete” channels
and snowball sampling are important to studies concerning this population.
The sample included former college: (a) football (n = 9), (b) baseball (n = 7), and (c)
men’s basketball (n = 1) players who competed for between two to five years (Note: To insure
confidentiality, pseudonyms are used for participants’ comments.). Thirteen participants self-
identified as White and four as Black. Four participants (three of whom were Black) indicated
their fathers had earned high school diplomas, while five fathers had completed some college,
and eight had earned college degrees (6 bachelor’s, 2 master’s). In addition, six participants
indicated their mothers possessed high school diplomas, one had some college, and nine mothers
had earned college degrees (4 bachelor’s and 5 master’s). Fourteen participants had two parents
in the household growing up, while all three single-parent households were headed by Black
women. Table 1 summarizes participants’ sport, family household, and education information.
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Table 1
Participant Sport/Household Background/Parental Educational Attainment Information
Education Level:
Education Level:
Single Mother
Both Parents
>3 Yrs. College
Both Parents
Single Mother
Both Parents
1-2 Yrs. College
1-2 Yrs. College
Both Parents
Both Parents
Both Parents
>3 Yrs. College
Both Parents
Both Parents
1-2 Yr. College
Both Parents
1-2 Yrs. College
Both Parents
Single Mother
1-2 Yrs. College
Both Parents
Both Parents
Both Parents
Both Parents
Twelve participants maintained a college grade point average (GPA) above 3.0, while
five had a GPA above 2.5. Thirteen participants had earned a bachelor’s degree, with four having
earned a master’s degree or higher. When asked about involvement in extra-curricular activities
other than athletics in college, 16 participants stated they would have liked to participate in such
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
activities, but their athletic role precluded it. Participants’ playing status ranged from four-year
starter to reserve, with a total of 11 starters and six reserves or non-starters (including players
who did not start, but who typically played during a game). Finally, 15 participants were
currently employed, while two were graduate students. Table 2 summarizes additional
participant information.
Table 2
Participant College/Current Professional Information
Sport Participation
Current Occupation
Project Manager
Graduate Student
Operations Manager
Pro-Basketball Player
Graduate Student
Claims Supervisor
Insurance Broker
Medical Salesman
Facilities Coordinator
Supply Chain Mgr.
Financial Advisor
Personal Trainer
Sales Director
Financial Sales
Insurance Salesman
Emergent Themes
This study sought to (a) give voice to former profit-athletes’ perceptions of their pre-
retirement athletic role sets and (b) allow subjects to discuss their post-athletic career transitions.
Within this research setting, four emergent themes were identified: (1) communal expectation of
sport participation, (2) athletic devotion at the expense of academic enrichment, (3)
professionalism of Division I college sports, and (4) commitment to athletic role set and
responsibilities. Table 3 summarizes these themes’ prevalence, by number of constructed codes
and number of times mentioned.
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Table 3
Prevalence of Emergent Themes
Note. Number in parentheses indicates frequency of coding occurrences.
Communal expectation of sport participation. Three role set elements (i.e., status,
role, and identity) guided emergent theme identification. The first identified theme was an
overwhelming communal expectation of sport participation. Maxx, a Black football player, who
was a three-year participant (one year as a starter), expressed such expectations:
Socially, mentally coming from the small town that I came from, I was the first guy to
make it to a Division I school since 1984. The guy who made it to the Division-I school
before me, became All-American, played like eight or nine years in the NFL and made
millions of dollars. So just naturally coming from a small town that next guy, people
thought it was just assumed that I was supposed to be that next small-town hero. And
whenever that didn’t happen, I almost went into depression.
This pressure was also communicated by Riley, a Black football player who identified as a
reserve or non-starter:
I mean, so many of my old teammates after they finished their football career and they
don’t make it to the NFL, their lives kind of fall apart because since they were a little kid,
their mom, their aunt, their brothers, their sisters, told them okay, you’re going to make it
Emergent Themes
Initial/Open Coding
Communal Expectation of Sport Participation
Family Pressure (36)
Communal Pressure to Succeed (33)
Hometown/In-state Pressure (27)
Athletic Devotion at the Expense of Academic
Social Alienation in Academic Settings
(27) Minimal Time for Academic
Application (34)
Unable to participate in non-sport
extracurricular activities/internships (23)
Lack of Connection with Academic
Personnel (21)
Professionalism of Division I College Sport
Shared Business Characteristics with
Professional Sports (23)
Level of Competition/No Longer Playing
for Fun (21)
Awareness of Revenue Being Generated
from Sport (17)
Commitment to Athletic Role Set and
Heightened Commitment to Athletic Role
Set (41)
Expectation of Extreme Athletic
Participation (32)
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
to the NFL. You’re going to get us out of this eight hundred square foot house where we
have six people living in it. And then they finish up school. They don’t make it to the
NFL and they feel like they failed their families. So, then they’re like what the hell am I
going to do now? And they just go off on the deep end because their family is still living
in that small home and they feel like they just let them down.
These two examples from former football players highlight the communal pressures and
expectations to meet friends and family’s expectation that they “go pro” or make it to “The
League” (Beamon, 2008). This pressure was not unique to former Division-I FBS football
players. Former Division-I baseball players also expressed the communal pressure of being a
“local kid” competing at a big-time baseball program. Parker, a White baseball player, who also
identified as a two-year starter stated:
Athletically, you know, there is kind of some added pressure being someone local. You
know, having a bunch of friends and family that were big fans and kind of being, if you
will, highly touted in the area and going to a big university also having the state paper
predicting you as a starting outfielder in the upcoming season before you even set foot on
campus is a ton of pressure.
Parker, expressed the belief that if as a local player you were successful, you could utilize
that to your advantage in a post-athletic career. For him the pressure of being local was
overwhelming and a source of transition difficulties.
Athletic devotion at the expense of academic enrichment. All participants
acknowledged a lack of focus on academics while participating in their sport. When asked about
their academic career and success, nine participants stated a desire to commit more time and
energy to their grades. Grayson, a former White football player, who also identified as a three-
year starter, indicated a strong connection to his academic role and responsibilities, and
expressed frustration when a former coach questioned his commitment and devotion to athletics,
because of his exceptionally high grade-point-average:
His comment was, ‘Man, I can see here that you’ve got a 4.0 GPA and that means that
you probably don’t try as hard at football as the rest of these guys.’ So, I don’t know that
that works well for you, or I don’t know that that’s a good thing for you. He was basically
giving me crap because I had good grades.
Several players noted a veiled animosity within the athletic subculture for athletes “too”
interested in academics or viewed as intellectuals.
A majority of participants stated they did not have a significant relationship with a faculty
member, with only minimal contact after they left the institution. Players expressed this lack of a
relationship was due to either large classes, minimal dialogue with faculty or staff members, or a
narrow focus on athletic roles and responsibilities. Ronnie, a White baseball player who
identified as a four-year starter, put it bluntly:
To be completely honest with you, I don’t really have a comment because I don’t
remember. It might have been baseball mind. I’m there to do one thing and one thing
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
only. In hindsight, should I have (you know) maybe had more of those relationships [with
faculty] and learned more about that because not everybody is going to be a major-league
baseball player? But unfortunately, I didn’t create those kind of relationships…
Several players expressed no surprise or regret at their non-existent relationship with faculty.
Professionalism of Division-I college sports. The current NCAA collegiate model is a
revenue-generating, professionalized, and commercialized entertainment enterprise that operates
within a commercial institutional logic (Southall & Nagel, 2008; Southall, Nagel, Aims, &
Southall, 2008; Southall & Staurowsky, 2013). Consistent with previous research, a majority of
participants acknowledged this reality, often using words and phrases such as: job, generating
revenue, or business oriented in describing their college-sport experiences. Beaux, a White
baseball player, who identified as a two-year starter, noted:
…You’re generating revenue for the university. And obviously, there’s a lot of money on
the line with what you pay coaches and also what you provide your student athletes as far
as scholarships and that. So, it’s just a whole different… It’s more, it’s not quite as
business oriented as let’s say professional baseball is, but it’s definitely a different
atmosphere. I mean just in terms of practice schedules. I mean your practicing way more.
The time that you have to dedicate to sports is a lot more than what it is in high school.
So, you know, I don’t think I ever could have thought about having a part-time job on the
Clarence, a White former baseball player (three years), discussed his transition from high school
to college:
From a sports aspect, up until then, sports had been you know something that was
definitely extracurricular, it was a lot of fun. It came very easy to me. I just enjoyed
playing. As soon as I hit college there was still like, it’s still the same sport, there’s still
the same thing that I love, but it was very, very…very, very down to business. A lot more
pressure associated with it than I had ever been in…Definitely really felt like, okay this is
a serious business now. Not just going out and having some fun…
These players’ view of college sports reflects what Nocera (2017) describes as the crux of the
issue “college sports is big business” (para. 12).
Commitment to athletic role set and responsibilities. Adler and Adler (1985) noted
profit-athletes frequently pragmatically detach from an academic role set. Such pragmatic
detachment results from a real-world need to devote time and energy to their athletic
responsibilities. Participant responses reveal they experienced heightened commitment to their
athletic role sets and responsibilities during college. When asked about his transition from high
school to college competition, Maxx highlighted the need to prioritize his athletic
Everybody earned the scholarship to be there. Everybody was big, fast and strong. So, the
strength and conditioning program was something that was a learning curve for me. And,
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
the playbook. You know, the playbook was a lot different than the simple defenses that
you ran in high school. In high school it was cover one, cover two, cover the rear man
you know? And then in college, you know, we’re doing cover two on one side, man on
the other, roll into a punch, like you were saying, a more sophisticated team… You
know, again you want to watch a lot of film whenever you go to college. That’s the
difference though between guys who play earlier on in their career compared to the guys
who redshirt…
Because of the strength and conditioning program’s sophistication, the playbook’s complexity,
and a need to maintain their position on the depth chart and compete for more playing time, most
athletes become increasingly committed to their athletic roles and responsibilities. Riley
discussed his decision to devote more time and effort to his athletic role set:
I was very capable of doing all the work and I probably could have been a straight-A
student, but I was so focused on football…I was so focused on football at the
time…playing football obviously, I had to balance so many things out. But it was hard
for me to sit there and make straight A’s in college and quote-unquote make straight A’s
on the football team, you know? I had to put a little bit more time into football…
This quote is consistent with Singer’s (2008) observation: “if it were not for the time constraints
and physical demands that are associated with big-time college sport participation, they [athletes]
could perform as well, if not better, then their non-athlete peers” (p. 404).
In the current study, one participant answered, “that’s just silly!” when asked if he had
participated in any non-sport or non-university related extracurricular activities. Another
participant stated that while he wanted to major in business management, he remained an
“Undecided” student his first two years, because business management classes conflicted with
his team’s practice schedule.
Athlete Career Transitions
In the current study, 14 of 17 participants expressed experiencing significant challenges
during their post-athletic career transition, including severe academic, professional, and/or social
skill deficits. As a consequence of their foreclosing other identities, all subjects experienced
difficulties in exiting their athletic role set. In addition, while all had secured post-athletic jobs,
many did not view their jobs as a career. All participants also reported a continual sense of “loss”
when asked about their post-athletic career transition experiences. These feelings ranged from
the initial trauma of retirement to still holding out hope of a professional sport career several
years after their college career had ended. This sense of loss is consistent with Beamon and
Bell’s (2011) findings that during post-athletic transition periods, athletes experience a traumatic
sense of loss akin to the death of a loved one or divorce. Consistent with Beamon and Bell’s
(2012) findings, our participants overwhelmingly felt their institution did not, but should have,
provided extensive and readily-available pre-transition/transition services.
While participants reported initially not feeling prepared to transition to the “real world,”
several felt the coping skills developed from being a profit-athlete were eventually a helpful
factor. Learning to “wake up early,” “weather the storm” and “outwork others” were all
attributed to being an athlete in a revenue-generating sport at a major university (Chen, Snyder,
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
& Magner, 2010; Leonard & Schimmel, 2016). Many subjects reported they were resilient and
able to overcome obstacles. While all subjects were clearly role-engulfed, they expressed using
their college sport participation experiences to navigate their transition. This is consistent with
Fraser, Galinksy and Richman’s (1999) concept of resilient individuals, “who adapt to
extraordinary circumstances, achieving positive and unexpected outcomes in the face of
adversity” (p. 136).
While viewing themselves as resilient, some participants also indicated experiencing
feelings of being “lost” as they transitioned out of their athlete roles into meaningful non-athletic
occupations. Significantly, all participants experienced challenges arising from being athletically
role engulfed. Consistent with previous research (Beamon & Bell, 2012), feelings of loss and
difficulties in relinquishing their athletic identities were prevalent during this post-athletic career
transition process. For some, these feelings manifested themselves in mental health impairments
including depression and suicidal ideation. Coupled with a lack of institutional resources to assist
with athletic career transition (i.e., proactive programming), the majority of participants reported
being “lost” and experiencing difficulties in “identity reformation” after college (Beamon &
Bell, 2012).
Nigel, a Black former three-year starter football player, personified the traumatic nature
of letting go of professional-football aspirations:
And I never did have an invitation from a NFL team to come to camp or anything like
that. I didn’t understand given what I did on the football field as a player at the
university, being a captain… it was difficult because again I fully expected to come to the
university and be a three-year starter and I was out after my third year. So, to deal with
the possibility of me not seeing the NFL was difficult to cope with…for me not to get an
opportunity I mean to even go to camp and see if I could play on their level, I couldn’t
quite grasp it.
Nigel explained that even with other non-sport career opportunities available, he still questions
why he was not able to play in the National Football League (NFL). Echoing this continual
questioning of why their professional sports careers never materialized, Stephen, a White former
three-year starter baseball player, said:
I never really, I felt, figured out what my full potential was and that was a little bit
difficult because I kind of walked away from athletics with this huge question mark. And
so, a lot of, you know that question currently running through your head. Could I still be
playing? Could things have turned out differently? Could I be playing professional ball
right now? I mean I have my hunches, but that always was in the back of my mind.
One participant explained his initial transition from sport participation by stating “it literally took
me two years to make the adjustment from the lifestyle I had been living to what a normal life is
all about.” Noting a minimal exposure to life outside of sport, every participant felt they would
have benefited from a mental-health professional or career counselor being readily available for
therapeutic and social support services. This perception supports recent research that has
identified the need for trained social workers to assist athletes in addressing mental health issues
and developing transition plans (Waller, Martin & Morgan, 2017), as well as the benefits of
psychosocial support, development of personal coping skills, and structured goal-setting
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
programming (Dean & Reynolds, 2017). However, as Moore (2017) noted, successfully
implementing such programs is challenging, since Division-I athletes experience significantly
lower levels of comfort in seeking behavioral health services. Unfortunately, it seems the most
role-engulfed athletes (i.e., profit athletes) may be the least likely to seek out such services
(Moore, 2017).
When faced with the end of their athletic careers, every subject reported having been
anxious about their futures. The conclusion of their college careers retirement was a time of
mixed emotions. They were at the pinnacle of their athletic prowess. They were starters and, in
many ways, campus celebrities, recognized for their athletic achievements. The end of this life,
this role in which they had become engulfed, came as a shock. They had been so focused on the
next game, repetition, practice, or play that they were unprepared for the abrupt end of their
athletic identity. Coaches had wanted them primarily focused on the short-term goals of winning
each game and performing well at each practice. There had been no time to think about what
they would do after they quit playing.
Most had not thought about what came after college. Changes in their rituals were jarring.
Media, coaches, fellow students, and fans were no longer enamored with them. The loss of their
core identity was a letdown. Similar to Adler and Adler’s (1991) findings, almost all of our
subjects underwent an institutionalized role exit, in which they lacked control over the decision
to conclude their athletic role. They often felt powerless and frustrated, but took solace from the
fact that they were not undergoing their transition totally alone. They had other teammates who
were experiencing the same rite of passage (e.g., end of eligibility, graduation, etc.). Several
subjects reported talking with teammates about what was to come next. While they were still
anxious about the future, having someone to talk to about it was helpful.
Historically, a significant number of NCAA profit-athletes are Black, from lower
socioeconomic backgrounds, and have low graduation rates and large adjusted graduation gaps
(AGGs) (Southall et al., 2015). While previous research has focused on the academic challenges
and role disengagement difficulties of Black profit-athletes from lower socio-economic
backgrounds (Adler & Adler, 1991; Beamon & Bell, 2012; Southall & Weiler, 2014) this study’s
subjects were overwhelmingly White, and middle-to-upper-middle class, with strong local or
regional social support systems.
Even though this sample in which all participants have earned at least a bachelor’s
degree is not typical of the overall profit-athlete population, every participant regardless of
ethnicity or socio-economic status perceived that when they were profit-athletes they had
gloried self athletic status, were athletically role engulfed (with their athletic role having reached
a level of role domination), and had adopted a salient athletic identity. Without exception, in an
attempt to become a successful FBS-level athlete they had all acquiesced and adopted an athletic
role set that necessarily required them to abandon any semblance of academic and social role
sets. All subjects focused their physical and mental energies on athletics, socially isolating
themselves, and minimizing their academic engagement. They were, in many ways, not student-
athletes; they were simply…athletes.
In addition to all study participants being college graduates, it should be noted all
subjects expressed overall satisfaction with their college experience. However, since hundreds of
prospective former athletes did not respond to repeated requests to participate in the study, a
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
limitation of this study is we have no way of knowing whether the experiences of our 17 subjects
are typical of the overall profit-athlete population at this university or within the institutional
field of big-time college sport. Significantly, even those who had an “overall” positive college
sport experience evidenced role-set engulfment and transition difficulties.
The typicality of this or any retrospective study is also affected by participants’ ability
to accurately recall their experience because of memory transience (Schacter, 1999).
Specifically, chronological distance from sport participation can affect subjects’ ability to recall
their unique transitional experiences, especially when such experiences were pronounced
(Schacter, 1999). Therefore, memory transience may have influenced participant responses to
certain interview questions, muting initial feelings associated with a transition event (e.g., sport
retirement, athlete career transition, injury, graduation, available transition services).
As Adler and Adler (1991) noted, absent a strong social safety system when profit-
athletes’ athletic role engulfment reaches a level of role domination, they “…progressively
detach themselves from their investment in other areas and let go alternative goals and priorities”
(p. 27-28). Beamon and Bell (2012) contend Black profit-athletes from lower socio-economic
backgrounds face social and economic segregation on middle/upper-middle class predominately
white institution (PWI) campuses. They intimate that as a result, these athletes have more post-
athletic career transition difficulties than athletes (Black and White) from middle/upper-middle
socioeconomic backgrounds, who often have more stable family environments and stronger
social support systems, and may more easily obtain a meaningful college degree.
In light of the NCAA sponsored research that has been used to support an NCAA
narrative that athletic role-set dysfunction is rare among today’s profit-athletes (the majority of
whom are Black) (NCAA, 2016-2017; Gallup, n.d.), the universal prevalence of all three
elements of athletic role set dysfunction (i.e., gloried self athletic status, athletic role engulfment
and adoption of a salient athletic identity) among our predominantly White sample is a
significant finding. In addition, while some subjects showed evidence of Coakley’s (2007) “re-
birth” hypothesis and had minor transitional difficulties, others – who had lived most of their
lives within the culture of elite sports had more difficult transitions (e.g., depression and lack
of adjustment). These findings support the need for proactive programming for profit-athletes
whose college sports career is short-term or compressed (Gallmeier, 1990). The cornerstone of
any such programming is viewing college-sport participation as a short-term career, and
providing athletes with alternative identities to “try on” throughout their athletic careers.
While all athletes must be allowed to pursue their athletic dreams, the systematic
encouragement of “trying on” alternative identities would likely alleviate or mitigate post-
athletic career transition difficulties. The development of non-athletic alternative identities is
encouraged by exposure to academic environments with rigor, non-sport activities in the
offseason, and increased inclusion of profit-athletes within the general student population. In
addition, profit-athletes must be allowed and encouraged to participate in non-sport internships
in order to increase their vocational training and professional acumen. Such a mandate is
essential, as some of the participants in the current study indicated that due to their athletic
participation, they did not have time to participate in meaningful internships prior to their sport
Proactive programming, developed, controlled and implemented by a non-athletic
department entity, would better prepare profit-athletes to transition out of athletics and into other
pursuits and/or careers when competitive athletics is concluded. Such programming would
prepare athletes for the inevitable termination of their athletic role set. Instead of being an
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
ephemeral alternative or fall-back plan, the transitioning into a new role/identity could be a
prepared-for process. This integration of academic, social, and occupational enrichment activities
would help prepare profit-athletes for a successful post-athletic career transition. While coaches
and athletic staff can be vital to this transition process, too often they neglect players once they
have exhausted their athletic eligibility. Such neglect is not necessarily out of malice, but a
function of coaches and athletic department staff members needing to focus their attention on
current profit-athletes in order to win games and generate revenue. Therefore, it is crucial control
of such programming be outside of an athletic department.
Even within the current college-sport system, there are signs some athletic departments
recognize resources need to be directed toward athlete transition programming. One example is
the University of South Carolina (UofSC) (a member of the Southeastern Conference [SEC]),
which recently hired a well-known former UofSC running back, Marcus Lattimore, as the
Director of Player Development and Director of Beyond Football (Cloninger, 2018). According
to a news account, Lattimore will assist and aid UofSC football players through their college
experience, while developing each player for a life after football. During the press conference
introducing Lattimore, University of South Carolina athletic director Ray Tanner noted, “[I
regret] the university had ‘missed the boat’ in providing off-field training for its student-athletes
in the early years of [my] tenure” (Kendall, 2018, para. 10).
Public acknowledgement of this shortcoming is an initial step in understanding sport
retirement and athlete career transition issues within big-time college sport. The University
contends Lattimore will bridge the gap between current life as a profit-athlete and after sport
participation. Since the primary focus in big-time college sports is unlikely to morph from
winning and revenue generation, affecting real change in the lives of profit athletes will be a
challenge; it will involve openly addressing profit-athletes’ on-campus lifestyles and post-
athletic transition problems. Therefore, even minor change within the current system must
involve developing and implementing independent proactive programming in order to help
profit-athlete’s develop the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes to successfully disengage
from their profit-athlete role set and successfully transition into a new exciting and productive
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Adams, C., Coffee, P., & Lavallee, D. (2015). Athletes’ perceptions about the availability of
social support during within-career transitions. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review,
11(2), 37-48.
Adler, P., & Adler, P. A. (1985). From idealism to pragmatic detachment: The academic
performance of college athletes. Sociology of Education, 58(4) 241-250.
Adler, P., & Adler, P. A. (1987). Role conflict and identity salience: College athletics and the
academic role. The Social Science Journal, 24(4), 443-455.
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1989). The gloried self: The aggrandizement and the constriction of
self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(4), 299-310.
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards and blackboards: College athletes and role
engulfment. Columbia University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro
role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472-491.
Baillie, P. H., & Danish, S. J. (1992). Understanding the career transition of athletes. The Sport
Psychologist, 6(1), 77-98.
Baseball America. (2017, September 11). Minor league attendance by league. Retrieved from
Beamon, K. K. (2008). “Used goods” former African American college student-athletes’
perception of exploitation by Division I universities. The Journal of Negro Education,
77(4), 352-364.
Beamon, K. K. (2012). I’m a baller: Athletic identity foreclosure among African-American
former student-athletes. Journal of African American Studies, 16(2), 195-208. doi:
Beamon, K., & Bell, P. (2011). A dream deferred: Narratives of African-American male former
collegiate athletes’ transition out of sports and into the occupational sector. Journal for
the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 5(1), 29-44. doi: 10.1179/ssa.2011.5.1.29
Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectancies, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic
Bishop, G. (2013, August 2). Oregon embraces ‘University of Nike’ Image. The New York
Times. Retrieved from
Blinde, E. M., & Greendorfer, S. L. (1985). A reconceptualization of the process of leaving the
role of competitive athlete. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 20(1-2), 87-
Botterill, C. (1990). Sport psychology and professional hockey. The Sport Psychologist, 4(4),
Breech, J. (2016, June 16). Coroner’s report reveals contents of Lawrence Phillips’ suicide note.
Retrieved from
Brewer, B. W., & Petitpas, A. J. (2017). Athletic identity foreclosure. Current Opinion in
Psychology, 17, 118-122.
Brewer, B. W., van Raalte, J. L., & Linder, D. E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules' muscles or
Achilles heel? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24(2), 237-254.
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Briganti, A. (Producer), & Greenburg, R. (Director). (2016). Running for his life: The
Lawrence Phillips story [Motion Picture]. United States: Ross Greenburg Productions.
Brown, C., Glastetter-Fender, C., & Shelton, M. (2000). Psychosocial identity and career control
in college student-athletes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(1), 53-62.
Callero, P. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 203-215.
Chadiha, J. (2012, May 31). Life after NFL a challenge for many. Retrieved from
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Retrieved from
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2002). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity
of the craft. Retrieved from
Chen, S., Snyder, S., & Magner, M. (2010). The effects of sport participation on student-athletes’
and non-athlete students’ social life and identity. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate
Athletics, 176-193. Retrieved from http://csri-
Cloninger, D. (2018, January 11). Marcus Lattimore joining South Carolina football staff.
Retrieved from
Coakley, J. J. (1983). Leaving competitive sport: Retirement or rebirth? Quest, 35(1), 1-11.
Coakley, J. J. (1986). Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies (4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
Coakley, J. J. (2007). Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies (9th ed.). New York: McGraw
Hill Higher Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano Clark, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research
designs: Selection and implementation. Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264. doi:
Cummins, P., & O’Boyle, I. (2015). Psychosocial factors involved in transitions from college
to post college careers for male NCAA Division-I basketball players. Journal of Career
Development, 42(1), 33-47.
Dean, C. E., & Reynolds, J. F. (2017). Understanding student-athlete reintegration: Using social
work strengths. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics. 2017 Special Issue, 119-
129. Retrieved from
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2011). Social role theory. Handbook of Theories in Social
Psychology, 2, 458-476.
Ebberwein, C. A., Krieshok, T. S., Ulven, J. C., & Prosser, E. C. (2004). Voices in transition:
Lessons on career adaptability. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(4), 292-308.
Edwards, H. (2000). Crisis of Black athletes on the eve of the 21st century. Society, 37, 913.
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Eisenberg, J. (2013, October 16). Ex-Georgetown star Victor Page’s spiral continues with 10-
year prison sentence [Blog Post]. Retrieved from
Emmert, M. (2012). 2012 State of the association: President Emmert. Retrieved from
EerSports. (2017, March 6). 2017 baseball attendance report. Retrieved from
Erpič, S. C., Wylleman, P., & Zupančič, M. (2004). The effect of athletic and non-athletic factors
on the sports career termination process. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5(1), 45-59.
Foster, S. J., & Huml, M. R. (2017). The relationship between athletic identity and academic
major chosen by student-athletes. International Journal of Exercise Science, 10(6), 915-
Fraser, M. W., Galinsky, M. J., & Richman, J. M. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience:
Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23(3),
Frey, J. H. (1982). Boosterism, scarce resources and institutional control: The future of American
intercollegiate athletics. International Review of Sport Sociology 17, 53-70.
Gallmeier, C. P. (1990). Dinosaurs and prospects: Toward a sociology of the compressed career.
In K.M. Mahmoudi, B. W. Parlin, & M. E. Zusman (Eds.), Sociological Inquiry: A
Humanistic Perspective (5th ed.), pp. 55-65. Dubuque, IA: Kendall.
Gallup, Inc. (n.d.). Understanding life outcomes of former NCAA student-athletes: The Gallup-
Purdue Index Report. Retrieved from
Gitter, S., & Hunsberger, P. (2014, May 20). How much college quarterbacks are worth. Retrieved from
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation in mental patients and other
inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
Harris, J. C. (1994). Athletes and the American hero dilemma (Vol. 4). Champaign, IL: Human
Hawkins, B. J. (2010). The new plantation: Black athletes, college sports, and predominantly
white NCAA institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230105539
Hogg, M., Terry, D., & White, K. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of
identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.
Kendall, J. (2018, January 13). South Carolina football not selling NFL pipe dream is bold
stance. Retrieved from
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Kerr, G., & Dacyshyn, A. (2000). The retirement experiences of elite, female gymnasts. Journal
of Applied Sport Psychology, 12(2), 115-133.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M.
Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp.
293312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Khandkar, S. H. (2009). Open coding. University of Calgary, 23, 2009.
Kidd, V. D., Koba, T., Southall, R. M., Eckard, E. W., & Nagel, M. S. (2017, September 25).
2017 adjusted graduation gap report: NCAA division-I baseball “Since 2013, D-I
baseball graduation gaps still show no sign of improvement.” College Sport Research
Institute (CSRI). Columbia, SC.
Knights, S., Sherry, E., & Ruddock-Hudson, M. (2016). Investigating elite end-of-athletic-
career transition: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(3),
291-308. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2015.1128992
Kruzel, J. (2018, February 1). Are college basketball graduation rates at an all-time high, as John
Calipari said? PolitiFact. Retrieved from
Kuettel, A., Boyle, E., & Schmid, J. (2017). Factors contributing to the quality of the transition
out of elite sports in Swiss, Danish, and Polish athletes. Psychology of Sport & Exercise,
29, 27-39.
LaMonica, M., & Baumbach, J. (2015, January 22). Life after football. Retrieved from
Latack, J. C., & Dozier, J. B. (1986). After the ax falls: Job loss as a career transition. Academy
of Management Review, 11(2), 375-392.
Lavallee, D. (2006). Career awareness, career planning, and career transition needs among
sports coaches. Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 66-79. doi:
Leonard, J. M., & Schimmel, C. J. (2016). Theory of work adjustment and student-athletes’
transition out of sport. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 62-85. Retrieved
from http://csri-
Manfred, T. (2013, March 20). Here’s how much big-time college athletes should be getting
paid. Retrieved from
Marshall, V. W., Clarke, P. J., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2001). Instability in the retirement transition:
Effects on health and well-being in a Canadian study. Research on Aging, 23(4), 379-
409. doi: 10.1177/0164027501234001
Martin, J. J., Eklund, R. C., & Mushett, C. A. (1997). Factor structure of the athletic identity
measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,
14(1), 74-82.
Miller, L., & Buttell, F. P. (2018). Are NCAA Division I athletes prepared for End-of-Athletic-
Career transition? A literature review. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(1),
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Moore, M. (2017). Perceptions of seeking behavioral health services amongst college athletes.
Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics. 2017 Special Issue, 130-144. Retrieved
Murphy, G. M., Petitpas, A. J., & Brewer, B. W. (1996). Identity foreclosure, athletic identity,
and career maturity in intercollegiate athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 10(3), 239-246.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (n.d.). Amateurism. Retrieved from
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2016-2017). Diversity Research: NCAA Race and
Gender Demographics Database, Retrieved from
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2017, March 10). Estimated probability of competing
in professional athletics. NCAA Research. Retrieved from
Navarro, K. M. (2015). An examination of the alignment of student-athletes' undergraduate
major choices and career field aspirations in life after sports. Journal of College Student
Development, 56(4), 364-379. doi:
Nocera, J. (2017, October 13). It’s business, NCAA. Pay the players. Only the magic of the
market can cure what ails college sports. Bloomberg. Retrieved from
Ogilvie, B. C., & Howe, M. (1982). Career crisis in sport. In Proceedings of the Fifth World
Congress of Sport Psychology (pp. 176-183). Ottawa: Coaching Association of Canada.
Pearson, R. E., & Petitpas, A. J. (1990). Transitions of athletes: Developmental and preventive
perspectives. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(1), 7-10.
Perna, F. M., Ahlgren, R. L., & Zaichkowsky, L. (1999). The influence of career planning,
race, and athletic injury on life satisfaction among recently retired collegiate male
athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 13(2), 144-156.
Rasquinha, A. M., & Cardinal, B. J. (2017). Association of athletic identity by competitive
sport level and cultural popularity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 40(2), 191-203.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),
Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Richter, J. (1984). The daily transition between professional and private life. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive
neuroscience. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 182-203.
Schlossberg, N. K. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The
Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 2-18.
Senecal, G. (2017). The aftermath of violence: Difficulties faced in the athletic career transition
of contact sport athletes. New Male Studies, 6(1), 48-74.
Simon, R. W. (1992). Parental role strains, salience of parental identity and gender differences
in psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(1), 25-35.
Sinclair, D. A., & Orlick, T. (1993). Positive transitions from high-performance sport. The Sport
Psychologist, 7(2), 138-150.
Kidd, Southall, Nagel, Reynolds II & Anderson
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Singer, J. N. (2008). Benefits and detriments of African American male athletes’ participation in
a big-time college football program. International Review for the Sociology of Sport,
43(4), 399-408. doi: 10.1177/1012690208099874
Southall, R. M., & Nagel, M. S. (2008). A case-study analysis of NCAA Division I women’s
basketball tournament broadcasts: Educational or commercial activity? International
Journal of Sport Communication, 1(4), 516-533.
Southall, R. M., Eckard, E. W., Nagel, M. S., & Randall, M. H. (2015). Athletic success and
NCAA profit-athletes’ adjusted graduation gaps. Sociology of Sport Journal, 32(4), 395-
Southall, R. M., Hancock, K. L., Cooper, C. G., & Nagel, M. S. (2012). College World Series
broadcasts: “They are what they are.” Journal of Sports Media, 7(2), 41-60.
Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Amis, J., & Southall, C. (2008). A method to March Madness:
Institutional logics and the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I
men’s basketball tournament. Journal of Sport Management, 22(6), 677-700.
Southall, R. M., & Staurowsky, E. J. (2013). Cheering on the collegiate model: Creating,
disseminating, and imbedding the NCAA’s redefinition of amateurism. Journal of Sport
and Social Issues, 37(4), 403-429. doi: 10.1177/0193723513498606
Southall, R. M., & Weiler, J. D. (2014). NCAA Division-I athletic departments: 21st century
athletic company towns. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 161-186. Retrieved
from http://csri-
Stambulova, N. (2000). Athletes' crises: A developmental perspective. International Journal of
Sport Psychology, 31(4), 584-601.
Stambulova, N., Alfermann, D., Statler, T., & Côté, J. (2009). ISSP Position Stand: Career
development and transitions of athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 7(4), 395-412.
Stankovich, C. E., Meeker, D. J., & Henderson, J. L. (2001). The positive transitions model
for sport retirement. Journal of College Counseling, 4(1), 81-84.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Palo Alto:
Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess
(Eds.), Self and Identity: Psychosocial perspectives, p. 89-103. Oxford, England: John
Torregrosa, M., Boixadós, M., Valiente, L., & Cruz, J. (2004). Elite athletes’ image of
retirement: The way to relocation in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5(1), 35-43.
Uberoi, N. (2015, August 13). Neha Uberoi: My painful journey from a pro tennis career to self-
discovery. Retrieved from
Athletic Role Set and Post-Athletic Transitions
Downloaded from ©2018 College Sport Research Institute. All rights reserved. Not for
commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
Uthman, D. (2013, August 1). Stunning amenities in Oregon’s new football facility. USA Today
Sports. Retrieved from
Van der Heijden, B. I., Schalk, R., & van Veldhoven, M. J. (2008). Ageing and careers:
European research on long-term career development and early retirement. Career
Development International, 13(2), 85-94. doi: 10.1108/13620430810860512
Waller, R., Martin, C., & Morgan, S. (2017). Is there a need for social workers in intercollegiate
athletics? A conceptual study. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics. 2017 Special
Issue, 72-94. Retrieved from
Webb, W., Nasco, S., Riley, S., & Headrick, B. (1998). Athlete identity and reactions to
retirement from sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21(3), 338.
Werthner, P., & Orlick, T. (1986). Retirement experiences of successful Olympic athletes.
International Journal of Sport Psychology 17, 337-363.
Wooten, H. (1994). Cutting losses for student-athletes in transition: An integrative transition
model. Journal of Employment Counseling, 31(1), 2-9.
Wylleman, P., & Reints, A. (2010). A lifespan perspective on the career of talented and elite
athletes: Perspectives on high-intensity sports. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine &
Science in Sports, 20(s2), 88-94.
The COVID 19 pandemic warranted modifications to spectating experiences of parents whose children participated in youth sports. Arguably, this time period is the first where parent attendance (physical presence) was (a) prohibited due to the shutdown of sports activities (b) required modifications such as mask wearing and social distancing in accordance with local regulations and/or (c) parents were forced to watch their children virtually. Parent participants had varied lived experiences tied to a plethora of emotions, ranging from detachment to gratitude. Within this practice note, the author discusses both an exploratory research study and practice implications for sport social workers and other practitioners seeking to better understand how parenting within the youth sport environment was influenced by the pandemic. Provided are highlights from the research study and a practical guide to assess the nature of these experiences upon parenting practices and their influence upon the family system.
Given the increased attention on college athlete well-being, effective athlete development has emerged as a timely and relevant topic to empirically study. Moving beyond physical and sport-specific advancement, the authors examine how college athletes' social support is critical to their development. Utilizing the sport development frameworks, specifically the retention stage of elite athlete development, the mechanisms that provided social support were revealed through a two-phased study. Survey data from 776 college athletes (Phase One) were utilized to inform focus groups (n=31; Phase Two). The researchers identified Openness and Honesty, Equal Treatment, Intentional Programming, and Informal Interaction as essential best practices in retaining college athletes. The critical role of organizational planning in lessening stress while improving well-being and athletic advancement is demonstrated with practical examples that can be applied by athletic department administrators. Further, the researchers highlight that the various forms of athlete well-being (e.g., physical, mental, social) are not independent, but interconnected and must be intentionally pursued by stakeholders. This article may be downloaded using the following link:
Full-text available
Objective: This review focuses on research that specifically highlights the constructs, paradigms, and factors that impact the end-of-athletic-career transition. However, the majority of the research conducted around this topic is established outside of the United States and regarding professional athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is one of the most dominant athletic institutions in the world, and arguably transitions the most end-of-athletic-career athletes per year, and minimal research exists on this specific collegiate athletic population. The purpose of this review is to review the existent literature on this topic and highlight the leading research and components impacting athletes during the end-of-athletic-career transition in order to inform future research and practices with the college athletics population. Method: This review utilizes a Client Oriented Practical Evidence Search question as an Evidence Based Practice approach to guide the literature search and literature review process while identifying the leading research contributing to end-of-athletic-career transition. Results: Following rigorous search criteria, a total of 14 articles were included in the literature review. The selected articles identified central constructs impacting the athletic career transition process, including retirement planning, identity loss, coping skills, and support systems. Conclusion: Additional research is warranted in the United States, particularly with the NCAA collegiate athletes in order to better understand the end-of-athletic-career transition process, as well as instituting interventions to increase resilience in college senior NCAA athletes transitioning out of sport.
Full-text available
This study examines the correlation between athletic identity and academic major selection among intercollegiate student-athletes. A thorough review of literature focusing on academic clustering, athletic identity, and academic development leads to the development of two hypotheses – 1) student-athletes with stronger athletic identity will have a declared major of decreased academic rigor; and 2) student-athletes with stronger athletic identity will be more likely to be undecided on their major. Data were collected through a survey administered to Division I, II, and III student-athletes recording academic major and their Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS). After analyzing the student responses, Hypothesis I is supported, while Hypothesis II is met with some limitation that leads to a lack of statistical significance. Overall, this study sheds light on a connection between academic choice and athletic identity.
Full-text available
Full-text available
This paper will examine the effects of enabling violence, the provocation of violent tendencies, and, ultimately, the emotional draw to violence in the lived experience of individuals who have competed in contact sports. Many athletes will leave the unique social arena perpetuated in contact sports for careers in a society governed by laws of civility and propriety that suppress and deter the level of aggression and violence condoned in their former career. Many of the participants in this study expressed how they find satisfaction in violence and were initially drawn to contact sports as a result of the longing to express violent mindsets and behaviors. However, in the advent of retirement, participants expressed how they often miss the process of releasing aggression and engaging in physical contact regularly. The vacuum for violence experienced in retirement often led to certain psychosocial frustrations for participants in their lives after sport.
Full-text available
Objectives The aim of this study was (a) to compare athletic retirement of former Swiss, Danish, and Polish athletes; and (b) to explore the influence of factors on the quality of the transition. Based on existing transitional models, we developed a working model to investigate the predictive power of commonly assumed resources and barriers related to the transition (Park, Lavallee, & Tod, 2013). Design and methods Former international elite athletes from Switzerland (n = 231), Denmark (n = 86), and Poland (n = 84) from 35 different sports completed an online questionnaire in their native language. Mean/proportional differences across countries were explored using ANOVAs and chi-square tests. For each sample, a multiple regression analysis was performed with 26 predictors on the transition quality, which was a component score of seven variables. Results and conclusions More differences were found among individual characteristics (e.g., educational level, athletic identity, confidence in skills), whereas athletes reported a similar pattern concerning retirement planning and voluntariness to end their career regardless of the context. The adaptation process following the career end was easiest for Swiss athletes and most difficult for Polish athletes. Results of the multiple regressions revealed both common resources (e.g., voluntariness) and barriers (e.g., athletic identity), but also factors that worked as resources in one context, but as barriers in another (e.g., high sportcareer income). We propose to avoid generalizations about resources and barriers influencing the transition, but to apply a culturally sensitive approach when studying athletic retirement in different contexts.
Research regarding eating disorders among intercollegiate female athletes is well-documented. Since eating disorders have been categorized as potentially serious mental illnesses by the American Psychiatric Association (APA, 2013), professionals need to be knowledgeable and involved in the overall care of college athletes. However, those closest to the athlete such as athletic trainers and coaches often lack the knowledge to detect symptoms and/or ability to assist those afflicted with eating disorders. To make a difference, a health care professional, such as a clinically trained social worker, should be considered to assist with the well-being of athletes. This conceptual study explores the deficiencies of intercollegiate coaches as well as athletic trainers and advocates for the inclusion of qualified social workers as part of a multidisciplinary approach to help intercollegiate female athletes who suffer from eating disorders.
Athletic identity foreclosure refers to commitment to the athlete role in the absence of exploration of occupational or ideological alternatives. This article traces the theoretical underpinnings of the construct, examines the role of sport participation in identity development, and provides an overview of the course, correlates, and consequences of athletic identity foreclosure. Implications for future research are discussed.