Access to this full-text is provided by PLOS.
Content available from PLOS One
This content is subject to copyright.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A comparative ultrastructure study of storage
cells in the eutardigrade Richtersius coronifer in
the hydrated state and after desiccation and
heating stress
Michaela Czernekova
´
1,2,3
*, Kamil Janelt
4
, Sebastian Student
5
, K. Ingemar Jo
¨nsson
1
,
Izabela Poprawa
4
*
1Department of Environmental Science and Bioscience, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden,
2Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, 3Faculty of
Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 4Department of Animal Histology and Embryology,
University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland, 5Silesian University of Technology, Institute of
Automatic Control, Gliwice, Poland
*CzernekovaM@seznam.cz (MC); izabela.poprawa@us.edu.pl (IP)
Abstract
Tardigrades represent an invertebrate phylum with no circulatory or respiratory system.
Their body cavity is filled with free storage cells of the coelomocyte-type, which are responsi-
ble for important physiological functions. We report a study comparing the ultrastructure of
storage cells in anhydrobiotic and hydrated specimens of the eutardigrade Richtersius coro-
nifer. We also analysed the effect of temperature stress on storage cell structure. Firstly, we
verified two types of ultrastructurally different storage cells, which differ in cellular organelle
complexity, amount and content of reserve material and connection to oogenetic stage.
Type I cells were found to differ ultrastructurally depending on the oogenetic stage of the ani-
mal. The main function of these cells is energy storage. Storage cells of Type I were also
observed in the single male that was found among the analysed specimens. The second
cell type, Type II, found only in females, represents young undifferentiated cells, possibly
stem cells. The two types of cells also differ with respect to the presence of nucleolar vacu-
oles, which are related to oogenetic stages and to changes in nucleolic activity during
oogenesis. Secondly, this study revealed that storage cells are not ultrastructurally affected
by six months of desiccation or by heating following this desiccation period. However, heat-
ing of the desiccated animals (tuns) tended to reduce animal survival, indicating that long-
term desiccation makes these animals more vulnerable to heat stress. We confirmed the
degradative pathways during the rehydration process after desiccation and heat stress. Our
study is the first to document two ultrastructurally different types of storage cells in tardi-
grades and reveals new perspectives for further studies of tardigrade storage cells.
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 1 / 19
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Czernekova
´M, Janelt K, Student S,
Jo¨nsson KI, Poprawa I (2018) A comparative
ultrastructure study of storage cells in the
eutardigrade Richtersius coronifer in the hydrated
state and after desiccation and heating stress.
PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201430. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0201430
Editor: Michael Klymkowsky, University of
Colorado Boulder, UNITED STATES
Received: February 27, 2018
Accepted: July 16, 2018
Published: August 10, 2018
Copyright: ©2018 Czernekova
´et al. This is an
open access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the manuscript and Supporting Information
files.
Funding: This work was supported by the
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO:
67985823) (to MC), the Mobility Fund of Charles
University in Prague (Czech Republic) (to MC), and
the Kristianstad University (Sweden) (to KIJ).
Microscopic analysis (confocal microscopy) was
performed using the infrastructure that is
Introduction
Tardigrades represent an invertebrate phylum with many species that have evolved adapta-
tions to survive extreme levels of dehydration and freezing [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This has allowed
them to inhabit some of the harshest environments on Earth (e.g., continental Antarctica), as
well as equally extreme microhabitats in other areas (e.g., sun-exposed lichens and moss on
rocks) [7,8]. Tardigrades do not possess circulatory or respiratory systems, but their body cav-
ity is filled with storage (or body cavity) cells, which float freely in the body cavity lymph [7,8]
or sometimes adhere to the basement membrane of other tissues [7]. These storage cells are
responsible for important physiological functions, primarily nutrient transport and storage of
mainly lipids but also polysaccharides and pigments such as carotenes [9,10]. They also pro-
duce protein substances, which are gathered inside with lipid globules [10], and in some tardi-
grade species, vitellogenins are developed in the storage cells [11,12]. Their energy storage
function is well illustrated by the change in cell size over the oocyte maturation cycle, during
which the cells grow in size from the early to the middle part of the cycle and decrease in size
towards the end of the cycle as the energy demand of the developing eggs increases [11,12,
13]. A similar pattern has been shown for the amount of energy reserve material in the cells
[14]. Declines in storage cell size connected with a period of anhydrobiosis have been reported
(Richtersius coronifer (Richters, 1903) [13]; Milnesium tardigradum (Doyère, 1840) [15]). How-
ever Czernekova
´and Jo¨nsson [16] did not observe such changes after repeated periods of
anhydrobiosis in R.coronifer.
Storage cells have also been used to study of DNA damage induced by desiccation. Neu-
mann et al. [17] documented DNA fragmentation in storage cells of M.tardigradum after peri-
ods in the anhydrobiotic state and showed that fragmentation increased with time spent in the
dry state (from 2 days to 10 months). Since many limnoterrestrial tardigrades are able to revive
successfully after years of anhydrobiosis [18,19] these animals seem to have an extraordinary
capacity to repair the damage that arises and is accumulated during the dry state. However, the
extent to which storage cells are damaged ultrastructurally after long-term anhydrobiosis or
exposure to other stressors remains to be documented.
High temperature is an agent that may disrupt cell structures such as membranes, DNA
and proteins. Relatively few studies have evaluated thermotolerance in tardigrades. In the
hydrated state an upper tolerance level of 36˚C and 38˚C after 24 h exposure was reported in
Borealibius zetlandicus (Murray, 1907) [20] and in Macrobiotus harmsworthi (Murray, 1907),
respectively [21]. In the anhydrobiotic state short-term (1 h) heat tolerance is considerably
higher, and tolerances up to approximately 100˚C have been reported [22], but variations in
tolerance among tardigrade species are considerable [22,23]. Older studies have reported even
higher tolerances (up to 151˚C for 30 min. exposure [24]). In R.coronifer, the tardigrade used
in the present study, 1 h exposure of temperatures up to 70˚C did not affect survival, but at
80˚C, survival was below 20%, and at 85˚C, it was near zero [25]. Most studies on heat toler-
ance in desiccated tardigrades have used short exposure times (1 h), but Rebecchi et al. [26]
exposed anhydrobiotic tardigrades of the species Paramacrobiotus richtersi (Murray, 1911) to
37˚C at 30–40% RH for up to 21 days, with no effect on survival. However, a separate experi-
ment showed that the survival of dry animals over a 21 day period was inversely related to the
relative humidity at which the animals were kept [26]. There were also indications of DNA
damage (single-strand breaks) in animals exposed to the highest relative humidities. Analyses
of how exposure to heat affects the cell ultrastructure of tardigrades have not been reported.
In this study, we compared the ultrastructure of storage cells in active and anhydrobiotic
specimens of the eutardigrade R.coronifer. We also examined if storage cell structure was
affected by heat stress.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 2 / 19
supported by the POIG.02.01.00-00-166/08 (to IP)
and POIG.02.03.01-24-099/13 grant (to IP).
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
Materials and methods
We used the eutardigrade R.coronifer (Fig 1A and 1B), a species belonging to the order Para-
chela, family Macrobiotidae. This species has well-documented anhydrobiotic ability (e.g., [23,
27,28,29]). The specimens were obtained from mosses at the Alvar habitat of the Swedish Bal-
tic Sea island O
¨land [30]. Previous studies have shown that the population consists almost
exclusively of females [30]. More than one tardigrade extraction method was used. Tardigrades
were extracted from the sample by soaking dry mosses for 2 up to 4 h in distilled water, fol-
lowed by mixing and shaking them off. The sediment/water mixture containing tardigrades
was poured into cylinders and put aside for half an hour for decantation [31], additionally tar-
digrades were extracted with sieves (mesh size 250 and 40 μm) under running tap water. Only
medium–large size (ca. 0.5–1.0 mm body length) specimens were used. Specimens analysed in
the tun stage were desiccated individually on filter paper under 95% relative humidity (RH)
using a saturated salt solution (KNO
3
) in a closed container at room temperature (see, e.g.,
[32]). In specimens analysed in the hydrated state, the stage of oogenesis (see, e.g., [12]) was
recorded in order to evaluate if storage cell structure differed between oogenesis stages.
I. Non-experimental analyses of storage cells in desiccated and hydrated
specimens
Light and transmission electron microscopy. Forty-five active animals and fifteen tuns
were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 4˚C, 2 h).
The material was post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (4˚C, 2 h)
and washed in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer. After dehydration in increasing concentrations of
ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90, 95 and 100%, each for 15 min), a mixture of 100% ethanol and acetone
(1:1, 15 min), and acetone (2 x 15 min), the material was embedded in epoxy resin (Epoxy
Embedding Medium Kit; Sigma). Semi- (800 nm thick) and ultra-thin (50 nm thick) sections
were cut on a Leica Ultracut UCT25 ultramicrotome. Semi-thin sections were stained with 1%
methylene blue in 0.5% borax and observed with an Olympus BX60 light microscope. Some of
the semi-thin sections (without staining with 1% methylene blue in 0.5% borax) were used for
the histochemical methods (see below). Ultra-thin sections were put on formvar-covered cop-
per grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The material was analysed with a
Hitachi H500 transmission electron microscope at 75 kV.
Additionally, ultrathin sections from ten hydrated and five desiccated specimens of R.coro-
nifer were used in order to evaluate the presence of structurally different storage cells. In each
section, 100 randomly selected cells were analysed.
Ultrathin sections of the R.coronifer bodies (five active animals and five tuns) were also
used to estimate the diameters of storage cells in active animal and in tun. Fifty storage cells in
each of five active animals and fifty storage cells in each of five tuns were measured. The active
animals and the tuns were at the same stage of oogenesis (late vitellogenesis).
Scanning electron microscopy. Five active animals and five tuns were fixed in 10% etha-
nol (2 min) and dehydrated in a graded concentration series of ethanol (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70,
80, 90, 4 x 100% each for 2 min), followed by a hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) chemical drying
series (ethanol:HMDS at 2:1, 1:1, 1:2 each for 10 min) and 100% HMDS (then allowed to air
dry). Dried specimens were mounted on SEM stubs and coated with gold in a Pelco SC-6
duster. The material was examined using a Hitachi UHR FE-SEM SU 8010 scanning electron
microscope.
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry. Detection of polysaccharides (PAS
method). Semi-thin sections (from 5 active specimens and 3 tuns) were treated with 2% peri-
odic acid (10 min, room temperature) in order to remove the osmium tetroxide from the
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 3 / 19
tissue, stained with Schiff’s reagent for 24 h at 37˚C [33] (Litwin, 1985), washed in tap water
(15 min) and observed with an Olympus BX60 light microscope.
Detection of proteins (Bonhag’s method). Semi-thin sections (from 5 active specimens and
3 tuns) were treated with a 2% solution of periodic acid as in the PAS method, stained with
bromophenol blue (BPB) (24 h at 37˚C) [33] (Litwin, 1985), washed in tap water (15 min) and
observed with an Olympus BX60 light microscope.
Detection of lipids. To detect lipids, semi-thin sections (from 5 active specimens and 3
tuns) were stained with Sudan black B [33] at room temperature for 20 min, washed quickly in
50% ethanol then in distilled water and observed with an Olympus BX60 light microscope.
BODIPY 493/503 –detection of lipids. Ten hydrated specimens and five tuns of R.coronifer
were punctured with a thin wolfram needle for better penetration of reagents inside the body
and fixed with 2.5% paraformaldehyde in TBS (45 min, room temperature). The specimens
were then washed in TBS and stained with 20 μg/ml BODIPY 493/503 (Molecular Probes) (30
min in darkness/room temperature). The material was then washed in TBS, stained with
Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/ml, 20 min, room temperature), washed in TBS and whole-mounted on
microscopic slides. The material was analysed with an Olympus FluoView FV 1000 confocal
microscope. Excitation at 493 nm was provided by a multi-line argon laser.
Immunolabelling with anti-phosphohistone H3—a mitotic-specific antibody (for detection
of cell proliferation). Ten hydrated specimens of R.coronifer were punctured with a thin wol-
fram needle for better penetration of the chemical reagents. The material was washed with
TBS (5 min), 0.1% Triton X-100 in TBS (5 min) and incubated in 1% BSA in TBS (1 h, room
temperature) without fixation. The material was then incubated overnight (16 h) in a 1:100
dilution of anti-phosphohistone H3 antibodies (Millipore) in 1% BSA in TBS. After incuba-
tion, the specimens were washed twice with TBS (5 min) and then incubated in a 1:200 dilu-
tion of goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa-Fluor 488 conjugated secondary antibody diluted in 1%
BSA in TBS (2 h, room temperature in darkness). Afterwards, the specimens were stained with
DAPI (1 mg/ml, 20 min, room temperature in darkness). The material was mounted onto
slides and analysed with an Olympus FluoView FV1000 confocal microscope. Excitation at
488 nm was provided by an argon/krypton laser.
TUNEL assay (detection of cell death). Ten hydrated specimens of R.coronifer were punc-
tured with a thin wolfram needle, incubated in a permeabilization solution (0.1% sodium cit-
rate) (2 min on ice in 4˚C) and washed in TBS (3×5 min). The specimens were then stained
with a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) reaction mix-
ture (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red, Roche; 60 min at 37˚C in the dark). A nega-
tive control was prepared according to the labelling protocol. The material was analysed with
an Olympus FluoView FV 1000 confocal microscope. Excitation at 594 nm was provided by a
multi-line argon laser.
II. Effects of long-term desiccation and heating on storage cell structures
Experimental design. We evaluated ultrastructural changes in storage cells after (i) desic-
cation of tardigrade specimens for six months and (ii) desiccation of tardigrade specimens for
six months + heating at 50˚C for 24 h. For both groups, analyses of storage cells were per-
formed both before (i.e., still desiccated specimens) and after rehydration (three and five hours
Fig 1. Storage cells (SC) of R.coronifer. (A) Tun, SEM. Bar = 30 μm. (B) Active animal, LM. Bar = 20 μm. (C) Storage cells, SEM.
Bar = 4 μm. (D-G) Ultrastructure of SC of non-experimental specimens, TEM: nucleus (n), nucleolus (nu), mitochondria (m), rough
endoplasmic reticulum (RER), spheres of reserve material (rm). (D-E). SC of male specimens. (D) Bar = 0.58 μm. (E) Bar = 0.5 μm. (F-G)
SC of female specimens. (F) SC of the first type during vitellogenesis, nucleolus vacuole (arrow). Bar = 0.8 μm. (G) SC of the second type.
Bar = 0.5 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430.g001
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 5 / 19
post-rehydration). Three specimens in each of the four categories (heated desiccated, non-
heated desiccated, heated rehydrated, and non-heated rehydrated) were used. In addition, 14
specimens each from category (i) and (ii) were prepared for analysis of survival. To analyse
storage cell ultrastructure, we used transmission electron microscope and histochemical meth-
ods for detection of lipid, proteins and polysaccharides.
Anhydrobiotic induction, heating and rehydration. Extracted animals were washed
thoroughly with distilled water to remove adherent particles. Five hours later the hydrated
specimens were dehydrated individually on small squares (5 cm
2
) of filter paper at 95% relative
humidity (RH) using a saturated salt solution (KNO
3
) in a closed container at room tempera-
ture. After 24 h, the filter papers with dehydrated specimens were enclosed in small plastic
bags and kept in the laboratory (room temperature) for 6 months. Immediately after the 6
month period, specimens in the heating group (animals determined for heating in incubator)
were heated in an incubator at 50˚C for 24 h. Half of them (n = 14) were then fixed in the des-
iccated state and prepared for microscopy, and the other half (n = 14) were rehydrated individ-
ually in circa 4 ml of distilled water in Petri dishes (60 x 15 mm). The same procedure, except
of heating, was used for the non-heated specimens. Specimens used for post-rehydration anal-
yses were rehydrated individually in Petri dishes (60 x 15 cm) with distilled water for 3 or 5 h
before fixation for ultrastructure analysis. Specimens used for survival analysis were checked
after 3 and 5 h post-rehydration. Animals were recorded as alive if they were active (slowly
moving and fully moving or fully active) and were still moving after 2 more hours (5h and 7h).
Light and electron microscopy. Ten desiccated (6 from the experimental and 4 from the
control group) and ten rehydrated (6 from the experimental and 4 from the control group)
specimens were prepared for analysis with a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H500
at 75 kV) as described earlier (see I. Non-experimental analyses of storage cells in desiccated
and hydrated specimens, light and transmission electron microscopy).
Histochemical analysis. Detection of polysaccharides (PAS method). Semi-thin sections
(from 4 active specimens and 3 tuns) were used for detection of polysaccharides. The same
method as in the non-experimental study was used; see the description above.
Detection of proteins (Bonhag´s method). Semi-thin sections (from 4 active specimens and
3 tuns) were used for detection of proteins. The method was described earlier (see the non-
experimental study, the description above).
Detection of lipids. Semi-thin sections (from 4 active specimens and 3 tuns) were used for
detection of lipids. The same method as in the non-experimental study was used; see the
description above.
Ethics statement: The study did not involve endangered or protected species, and moss
samples were not collected within an area where permission was required.
Results
Non-experimental analyses of storage cells
Storage cells of hydrated specimens. The body cavity of R.coronifer was filled with fluid
and storage cells (Fig 1B). The cells of examined specimens had ameboidal or spherical shapes
(Fig 1B and 1C). The average diameter of cells in the five specimens examined for cell size was
15.36 μm (S1 Table,S1 File). Among all analysed specimens (eighty active), we found only one
male. All desiccated animals (twenty-five tuns) were females.
Storage cells of the male. Only one type of storage cells (Type I) was observed in the
male. These cells had an ameboidal shape. The large nucleus (Fig 1D and 1E) with a non-
homogenous nucleolus was located in the centre of each cell (Fig 1E). The nucleolus was com-
posed of two types of material with different electron density. A small nucleolus vacuole with
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 6 / 19
low electron density was observed in the nucleolus (Fig 1E). The cytoplasm was filled with
organelles, such as ribosomes, mitochondria and short cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticu-
lum (Fig 1D and 1E). Moreover, non-homogenous spheres of different size and electron den-
sity were observed in the cytoplasm (Fig 1D and 1E). Most of the electron-dense spheres were
filled with granules of lower electron density (Fig 1D and 1E). Medium electron-dense spheres
and spheres of high electron density were also distinguished in the cytoplasm of the storage
cells (Fig 1D and 1E).
Storage cells of females. Two types of storage cells were found in females. The cells of the
first type (Fig 1F) were similar to those observed in the male, thus of Type I. Their ultrastruc-
ture differed in relation to the stages of oogenesis (see below). The cells of the second type
(Type II) had an ameboidal shape (Fig 1G), and their ultrastructure was similar during all
stages of oogenesis. The centre of each cell of Type II was occupied by a large lobular nucleus
with a large non-homogenous nucleolus. The external part of the nucleolus had a higher elec-
tron density than its internal part (Fig 1G). The cytoplasm of these cells was poor in organelles.
It contained ribosomes, mitochondria, a few short cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticulum
and several small electron-dense granules. Among the observed storage cells, we found on
average 7.2% cells of the Type II.
Ultrastructural differences in storage cells of Type I in relation to stage of oogenesis.
The process of tardigrade oogenesis can be divided into three major stages: previtellogenesis
(organelle accumulation and mRNA synthesis), vitellogenesis (early, middle and late vitello-
genesis—yolk synthesis and accumulation) and choriogenesis (egg shells formation) [34,35,
36,37]. To see if storage cell structure differed between oogenesis stages, we analysed 10 speci-
mens in previtellogenesis, 24 specimens in vitellogenesis, and 10 specimens in choriogenesis.
During previtellogenesis, the central part of each storage cell was occupied by a large nucleus
with a large non-homogenous nucleolus (Fig 2A). The internal part of the nucleolus had a
lower electron density than its external part. Moreover, a small nucleolus vacuole with a low
electron density was present (Fig 2A). At this stage the cytoplasm was filled with ribosomes,
short cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticulum, few mitochondria and a small amount of
reserve material (Fig 2A). The reserve material had the form of smaller and larger spheres of
different electron density. Smaller spheres were electron-dense, while the larger spheres had
lower electron density (Fig 2A).
Subsequently, during vitellogenesis, an increase in the number of mitochondria and spheres
of the reserve material were observed in the cytoplasm of the storage cells (Fig 1F). The central
part of each cell was still occupied by the large nucleus with a large non-homogenous nucleo-
lus. However, the nucleolus vacuole was not observed at this stage (Fig 1F). The stored spheres
of the reserve material had different sizes and electron density. Most of the spheres had
medium electron density. They possessed a high electron-dense external ring and granules of
lower electron density. Moreover, smaller homogenous electron-dense and medium electron-
dense spheres were observed (Fig 1F).
During late vitellogenesis and the beginning of choriogenesis the number of mitochondria,
cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticulum, and the amount and type of reserve material accu-
mulated in the cytoplasm of the storage cells did not change with respect to the stage of vitello-
genesis (Fig 2B). The amount of reserve material decreased significantly at the end of
choriogenesis (Fig 2C). Moreover, the number of mitochondria increased at this time. Addi-
tionally, some autophagosomes with fibrous medium electron dense material inside them
were observed in the cytoplasm (Fig 2C). The amount of reserve material decreased until the
end of oviposition. A very small amount of proteins (Fig 2D) and large amounts of polysaccha-
rides (Fig 2E) and lipids (Fig 2F and 2G) were accumulated in the cytoplasm of the storage
cells of the analysed species.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 7 / 19
We observed indications (not quantified) of degeneration of some individual storage cells.
The cytoplasm of these cells was electron-dense; many clusters of heterochromatin occurred in
the neighbourhood of their nuclear envelope, and their nuclei underwent fragmentation (Fig
3A). The fragmentation of DNA in nuclei (Fig 3B) indicates an apoptotic cell death of these
cells.
Sporadically, divisions of the storage cells were observed (Fig 3C). Since we did not obtain
images of the dividing cells by transmission electron microscopy, it was not possible to deter-
mine if dividing storage cells belonged to the first or second type.
Storage cells in desiccated specimens. We analysed storage cell ultrastructure in fifteen
tuns during different stages of oogenesis. The storage cells of tuns were shrunken and had an
ameboidal shape (Fig 3D). The average diameter of the cells in the five tuns examined for cell
size was 11.8 μm (S1 Table), which is significantly smaller than cells of hydrated specimens
(Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 0.0, P = 0.005, N = 10). The general characteristics of desiccated
storage cells of R.coronifer were reported in our previous article [38].
Immunolabelling. We detected cell divisions in 2 specimens in late stage of oogenesis
with the use of immunolabelling with anti-phosphohistone H3, a mitotic-specific antibody
(for detection of cell proliferation). In the first and second specimens, 7 nuclei and 5 nuclei,
respectively, were found in a mitotic stage. In one specimen in a late oogenesis stage, 4 nuclei
were detected with TUNEL labelling for detection of cell death.
Experimental study on long-term desiccation and heating
Survival of specimens. The survival of specimens desiccated (but not heated) for six
months was 100% (n = 14). All of the non-heated specimens (n = 14) were fully active (coordi-
nated body movements, directional movements forwards as well as to the side angles, using all
legs, moulting of cuticle) within 3 h after rehydration. The survival of heated specimens was
40% (6 survivals, n = 14). Among the heated survivors, 50% were fully active after 3 h of rehy-
dration, whereas the other specimens showed only some slow moves in some legs, and
required 5 h of rehydration to resume full activity.
Storage cell ultrastructure of heated and non-heated specimens. The storage cell ultra-
structure of heated and non-heated desiccated specimens appeared similar (Fig 4A and 4B).
The cells were shrunken with an amoeboid shape, and the cytoplasm was electron dense and
entirely filled with membrane coated spheres (Fig 4A and 4B). The centre of all observed cells
was occupied by an irregular nucleus with a distinct nucleolus and dense heterochromatin
masses (Fig 4A). Large autophagosomes were present in the cytoplasm of the storage cells of
both heated and non-heated specimens (Fig 4A and 4B). Differences between cells were only
found in the density of spheres. In the heated specimens, the non-homogenous larger spheres
were filled with granules of lower electron density, while the spheres of non-heated specimens
were homogenous (Fig 4A and 4B).
All rehydrated cells had a circular or amoeboid shape, and there was no apparent difference
in ultrastructure between non-heated and heated specimens. After 3 h of rehydration, the cyto-
plasm was electron lucent and containing a circular nucleus with a distinct nucleolus (Fig 4C
and 4D). The cytoplasm of both heated and non-heated specimens contained non-
Fig 2. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the SC of the first type during differentstages of oogenesis. (A-C) Ultrastructure of SC,
TEM: nucleus (n), nucleolus (nu), mitochondria (m), rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), spheres of reserve material (rm). (A)
Previtellogenesis, nucleolus vacuole (arrow). Bar = 0.47 μm. (B) Late vitellogenesis. Bar = 0.57 μm. (C) Late choriogenesis,
autophagosome (au). Bar = 0.65 μm. (D-G). Histochemical staining of SC, arrow indicates positive reaction: (D) BPB staining, LM.
Bar = 4 μm. (E) PAS method, LM. Bar = 3.5 μm. (F) Sudan Black B staining, LM. Bar = 3 μm. (G) BODIPY 493/503 and DAPI staining,
confocal microscopy. Bar = 10 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430.g002
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 9 / 19
homogenous and homogenous membrane coated spheres of various electron densities (Fig 4C
and 4D). Autophagosomes were observed in the cell cytoplasm (Fig 4C). After 5 h of rehydra-
tion, the storage cells contained nuclei with a distinct nucleolus in both non-heated and heated
specimens (Fig 4E and 4F). The nuclei of some cells were fragmented and degraded (not
shown). The spheres with reserve material, filling the cytoplasm of 5 h rehydrated cells, were
non-homogenous and contained electron lucent and medium electron dense bodies (Fig 4E
and 4F). Large autophagosomes were also observed in the cytoplasm after 5 h rehydration (Fig
4F).
Large amounts of lipid and polysaccharides and a low amount of protein were detected in
the storage cells of all examined specimens (not shown).
Discussion
Storage cells in active and anhydrobiotic animals
We compared storage cells of active and anhydrobiotic specimens of R.coronifer in all ooge-
netic stages. We observed dividing as well as apoptotic storage cells in active animals. Some
differences between storage cells of active and desiccated specimens of R.coronifer were
observed. During desiccation, the storage cells slightly changed their shape as the water evapo-
rated, and a low water content and condensed cytoplasm resulted in a higher electron density
of condensed cytoplasm and nucleoplasmic matrix [38], which confirmed the observations of
Walz [39]. The storage cells of the desiccated specimen also had significantly smaller cells than
the active animals. In cells of active specimens, we observed a higher number of autophago-
somes at the end of choriogenesis and after 3–5 h of rehydration.
Autophagic pathways allow cells to eliminate large portions of the cytoplasm, aberrant pro-
tein aggregates, damaged organelles or invading bacteria. Structures targeted for degradation
are gradually surrounded with the phagophore, and double membrane vesicles called autopha-
gosomes are formed [40]. Since autophagy is known to be a major factor in the turnover of
long lived proteins, the presence of autophagosomes indicates degradative pathways during
dehydration and rehydration processes in cells as a response to damage and/or starvation.
Autophagy might therefore be more common in cells that have undergone dehydration than
in the cells of healthy, well fed animals [40]. In tardigrades, autophagy was also observed in the
digestive cells of the midgut epithelium, and in trophocytes, at the end of oogenesis [36,40,
41]. In case of the midgut epithelium, initially, when the stressor (infection by pathogens, star-
vation) was weak, autophagy was activated. However, when the stressor was too strong, autop-
hagy initiated necrosis [36,41]. In trophocytes, autophagy is the first step of cell degeneration,
which is followed by apoptosis [40].
We verified ultrastructurally two types of storage cells, which differed in cellular organelle
complexity, amount and content of reserve material and connection with oogenetic stages.
The Type I occurred in both the male and females, while Type II was found only in females.
One of the features of Type I storage cells was the presence of nucleolar vacuoles. Nucleolar
vacuoles, also called nucleolar cavities or interstices, are rather characteristic of plant cells, are
rarely visible in animal nucleoli, and represent high nucleoli activity (RNA synthesis) [42,43,
44]. In plant cells, they are possibly connected with mitosis, particularly in condensation and
decondensation of chromosomes [45]. In females of R.coronifer, the nucleolus vacuoles were
Fig 3. Ultrastructure of storage cells (SC) of desiccated specimens. (A) Degeneration of SC, nucleus (n), spheres of reserve material (rm), TEM. Bar = 0.6 μm.
(B) Detection of the cell death, arrow indicates nucleus of the apoptotic cell, TUNEL, confocal microscopy. Bar = 40 μm. (C) Detection of the cell proliferation,
arrow indicates nucleus of the proliferating cell, anti-phosphohistone H3 staining, confocal microscopy. Bar = 25 μm. (D) Ultrastructure of SC of desiccated
specimen: nucleus (n), mitochondria (m), rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), spheres of reserve material (rm), TEM. Bar = 0.36 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430.g003
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 11 / 19
ultrastructurally related to oogenetic stages with respect to the presence/absence of this struc-
ture and the amount and type of reserve material. These cells were in general filled with plenty
of mitochondria, cisterns of rough endoplasmic reticulum and specific spheres of different
electron densities, particularly lipid reserve material. We therefore assume that storage cells of
Type I have intense metabolic activity and that their main function is storage and distribution
of energy [13,16]. This is in line with previous studies on storage cells in other tardigrade spe-
cies, indicating intense metabolic activity [8,11,12,14,46]. In relation to overall organelle
complexity differences and oogenesis, it seems that the function of nucleolar vacuoles in tardi-
grades is related to changes in nucleolic activity of storage cells during different stages of
oogenesis, which was previously suggested in other organisms [12,42,43,44]. Moreover, the
nucleolar vacuole serves as a diagnostic feature in some species, e.g., Caryophillidea (Cestoda).
Nucleolar vacuoles were also observed in storage cells of Hypsibius exemplaris Gąsiorek, Stec,
Morek and Michalczyk, 2018, Macrobiotus polonicus Pilato, Kaczmarek, Michalczyk and Lisi,
2003 and Xerobiotus pseudohufelandi (Iharos, 1966) [14]. Nevertheless, their specific function
in tardigrades cells (similar to other animal cells) is still unknown.
In tardigrades, yolk material accumulated in the cytoplasm of the oocytes is synthesized by
the oocyte and their sister cells (trophocytes); however, sometimes the yolk precursors are syn-
thesized by storage cells or the cells of the midgut epithelium [11,12,36]. The synthesis of yolk
precursors by storage cells was reported in some Macrobiotidae species, e.g., Dactylobiotus dis-
par (Murray, 1907) [12], M.polonicus and Paramacrobiotus richtersi (Murray, 1907) [11], as
well as in some other species, e.g., Hypsibius exemplaris and Isohypsibius granulifer granulifer
(Thulin, 1928) [14]. In some tardigrades, the amounts of reserve material accumulated in the
storage cells increases gradually during previtellogenesis and start to decrease during vitello-
genesis and choriogenesis [11,12,14]. These observations indicate participation of the storage
cells in yolk precursor synthesis. We observed that the fine ultrastructure of the first storage
cell type is in general similar to other Parachela species [14] but differs in stored reserve mate-
rial. During yolk synthesis (vitellogenesis), the amount of reserve material in storage cells of R.
coronifer increases, but no changes were observed during late vitellogenesis and choriogenesis.
Late vitellogenesis occurs at the simplex stage, a start of moulting stage, when the bucco-pha-
ryngeal apparatus is absent or incomplete, while the late choriogenesis is connected with the
moulting process [14,47,48]. At these stages, the animals do not eat, and the ovaries are large
and oppress the midgut lumen. Since these storage cells during late vitellogenesis/choriogen-
esis are similar to cells at other stages, we conclude that they are probably not involved in pro-
duction of vitellogenins. The observed decrease in reserve material after oviposition was
caused by starvation due to lack of feeding during oogenesis and the moulting process. Evi-
dence of energy reserve functions of storage cells during starvation periods (assumed also by
Reuner et al. [15]) were observed in Macrobiotus sapiens Binda and Pilato, 1986 and other tardi-
grades, where storage cell size was found to be smaller after starvation [8,9,11,14] and were
also related to the stage of oogenesis [8,12,14,46]. The size and content of reserve material in
storage cells is also species dependent, e.g., three types of reserve material spheres were found in
H.exemplaris,M.polonicus and I.g.granulifer, whereas only one type was found in Xerobiotus
pseudohufelandi (Iharos, 1966) [14]. In active specimens of R.coronifer, we found large amounts
of polysaccharides and lipids but low amount of proteins, similar to X.pseudohufelandi [14]. In
Fig 4. Ultrastructure of storage cells (SC) of experimental specimens. Autophagosome (au), nucleus (n), nucleolus (nu), spheres of
reserve material (rm), TEM. (A) SC of non-heated 6 month old desiccated specimens. Bar = 0.65 μm. (B) SC of heated 6 month old
desiccated specimens. Bar = 0.65 μm. (C) SC of non-heated 3h rehydrated specimens. Bar = 0.8 μm. (D) SC of 3h rehydrated specimens,
which were heated prior rehydration. Bar = 0.8 μm. (E) SC of non-heated 5h rehydrated specimens. Bar = 0.95 μm. (F) SC of 5h
rehydrated specimens, which were heated prior rehydration. Bar = 0.8 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430.g004
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 13 / 19
I.g.granulifer large amounts of polysaccharides but fewer lipids and proteins were observed,
and in H.exemplaris and M.polonicus, primarily lipids were observed [14]. In contrast, with
these species that inhabit limnic habitats, both R.coronifer and X.pseudohufelandi inhabit dry
terrestrial environments and are able to survive long periods of drought in the anhydrobiotic
state [49,50]. This supports the suggestion by Hyra et al. [14] that interspecies variability in stor-
age cells is related to habitats and anhydrobiotic properties.
The storage cells of Type II were found in much smaller numbers (7.2% in all analyzed
specimens) and only in females but with a similar ultrastructure during all oogenetic stages.
These cells had few organelles and did not contain nucleolar vacuoles. In general, the youngest
nucleoli are homogenous and do not possess nucleolar vacuoles [43], and it is possible that
these storage cells represent young undifferentiated cells, perhaps stem cells. In general, stem
cells are characterized as undifferentiated, unspecialized cells with simpler morphology com-
pared to specialized cells from the same lineage [51]. Polymorphism of coelomocytes has also
been verified in earthworms [52,53], nematodes [54], echinoderms [55] and sea urchins [56].
The classification of coelomocytes is mostly based on differential staining, ultrastructure, and
granule composition, as well as on behavioural traits (such as a tendency to form aggregations
or filopodia in some cell types) but is still uniformly unsatisfactory, mostly due to various func-
tional states and stages of maturation [57]. The classification of coelomocytes in earthworms is
not well standardized, and the number and size of different coelomocytes can vary from spe-
cies to species [52,58]. However, it is assumed that coelomocyte types are derived from a com-
mon stock of stem cells, and different types of coelomocytes may be produced by direct
transformation from stem cells [59]. Our study might be the first to ultrastructurally indicate
the possible stem cells of tardigrade storage cells.
Exposures to long-term desiccation and heating
The results of this study suggest that storage cells of the eutardigrade R.coronifer are not
affected ultrastructurally by six months of desiccation or by heating at 50˚C for 24 h. Still, heat-
ing of the tuns tended to considerably decrease survival of the animals. Additionally, the time
of rehydration required to revive the animals tended to be longer for tuns exposed to heating.
Thus, there were no indications that effects on viability of induced stress were connected with
changes in the general structures of storage cells. Ramløv and Westh [25] did not find any
effects on survival after heating R.coronifer for one hour at 50–70˚C, while survival declined to
approximately 20% at 80˚C and to zero at 100˚C. Since in our study the specimens were desic-
cated for six months before heating at 50˚C, it is possible that this made them more vulnerable
to heat stress. Since repair mechanisms are not working during anhydrobiosis, damage due to
oxidative reactions with surrounding air accumulates over time [26]. Even if the non-heated
animals did not express reduced survival after the six-month period, it may have made the
body more vulnerable to damage by heat or unable to repair the inclusive damage from long-
term desiccation plus heating. These detrimental effects apparently did not arise from damage
to general cell structures but rather to molecular components necessary for cell survival. Pro-
tein denaturation occurs in cellular organelles during heat shock at temperatures of 42-45˚C
[60,61,62], and sub-lethal heat shock may also inactivate transcription, splicing and transla-
tion of mRNAs into proteins and alters cell morphology [60].
Relative humidity is another factor that may affect survival in desiccated tardigrades
exposed to heat. Ramløv and Westh [25] suggested that the relative humidity at which animals
were kept before heating (even at RH levels as low as 50%) may cause damage to cell compo-
nents such as proteins (denaturation) when exposed to high temperatures through residual
water present in the tun. In the eutardigrade Paramacrobiotus richtersi (Murray, 1911), very
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 14 / 19
low humidity (0–3% RH) resulted in significantly higher survival after continuous exposure to
37˚C for up to 21 days. Animals desiccated within their natural substrate (leaf litter) seemed to
be less sensitive than animals desiccated and kept on blotted paper and did not show reduced
survival when kept at 30–40% RH [26]. In our study, specimens were desiccated at 95% RH
but were then kept in plastic bags under ambient laboratory conditions (room temperature,
RH not monitored) until the heating exposure.
Vitrification has been proposed as a mechanism for survival in the anhydrobiotic state,
whereby membranes and other cell components are stabilized in the absence of water in a
non-crystalline amorphous solid (“glassy”) state that prevents cellular damage [63]. Evidence
for the vitrification hypothesis was reported for the Macrobiotidae family within tardigrades
[22], to which R.coronifer belongs. Although our observations of few differences in cell struc-
tures between hydrated and desiccated animals are in line with the prediction of the vitrifica-
tion hypothesis that cells are “frozen” in a glassy state, they do not provide direct support for it.
We detected large amounts of lipids and polysaccharides but low amounts of protein in the
storage cell cytoplasm of all examined specimens. Lipids have been proposed to have a key role
in heat stress management of cells [64], but in anhydrobiotic processes, their role remains
unclear. For anhydrobiotic nematodes, some have suggested that lipid reserves are not directly
involved in processes of anhydrobiosis [65], whereas others have suggested a direct relation-
ship between lipids/carbohydrates and successful anhydrobiosis [66]. Kinchin [46] proposed
that different animal groups may have different mechanisms and that in tardigrades, lipids
might be utilized during anhydrobiosis by conversion to glycerol or trehalose, which may sta-
bilize membrane and protein structures [27]. Lipids might also serve as an energy source for
metabolic preparations during anhydrobiotic induction or be used for energy after rehydration
[67]. More studies on the role of lipids in storage cell physiology and anhydrobiosis would be
valuable.
In conclusion, in our study we found (1) two types of storage cells in females of R.coronifer,
while only one type in one male studied; (2) the ultrastructure of the storage cells of the first
type changes during the process of oogenesis, while the ultrastructure of the second type of
cells does not change; (3) that cells of the second type possibly represent stem cells for storage
cells; (4) that storage cells (heated and non-heated specimens) accumulated large amount of
lipids and polysaccharides, whereas the amount of proteins is low; (5) that exposure to 24 h of
heating at 50˚C following six months of desiccation reduced animal survival to 40%, while all
non-heated animals recovered; and (6) no large differences in the ultrastructure of the storage
cells between heated and non-heated desiccated specimens.
Supporting information
S1 Table. The average diameter of storage cells in active and dehydrated animals. Estimates
represent individual averages based on measurements of 50 cells per animal.
(DOC)
S1 File. Storage cells diameter (μm). Measurements of storage cells diameter in 50 active and
50 dehydrated specimens.
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Danuta Urbańska-Jasik, Dr. Lukasz Chajec,
MSc. Marta Gołas (Department of Animal Histology and Embryology, University of Silesia,
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 15 / 19
Katowice, Poland) and Dr. Jagna Karcz (Scanning Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University
of Silesia, Katowice, Poland) for their technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO:
67985823), the Mobility Fund, Charles University in Prague, and the Kristianstad University,
Sweden. Microscopic analysis (confocal microscopy) was performed using the infrastructure
that is supported by the POIG.02.01.00-00-166/08 and POIG.02.03.01-24-099/13 grant.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Michaela Czernekova
´, Kamil Janelt, K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson.
Data curation: Michaela Czernekova
´, Izabela Poprawa.
Formal analysis: Michaela Czernekova
´.
Funding acquisition: K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson.
Investigation: Michaela Czernekova
´, K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson, Izabela Poprawa.
Methodology: Izabela Poprawa.
Project administration: K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson, Izabela Poprawa.
Software: Sebastian Student.
Supervision: K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson, Izabela Poprawa.
Visualization: Michaela Czernekova
´, Kamil Janelt.
Writing – original draft: Michaela Czernekova
´.
Writing – review & editing: Michaela Czernekova
´, K. Ingemar Jo¨nsson, Izabela Poprawa.
References
1. Keilin D. The Leeuwenhoek Lecture. The problem of anabiosis and latent life: history and current con-
cept. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1959; 150: 149–151.
2. Wright JC, Westh P, Ramløv H. Cryptobiosis in Tardigrada. Biol Rev 1992; 67:1–29.
3. Wright JC. Cryptobiosis 300 years on from van Leuwenhoek: What have we learned about tardigrades?
Zool. Anz. 2001; 240:563–582.
4. Boothby TC, Tapia H, Brozena AH, Pielak GJ, Koshland G, Goldstein B. Tardigrades use intrinsically
disordered proteins to survive desiccation. Molecular Cell. 2017; 65: 975–984 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
molcel.2017.02.018 PMID: 28306513
5. Neuman Y. Cryptobiosis: A new theoretical perspective. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006; 92 (2): 258–267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2005.11.001 PMID: 16380155
6. Wełnicz W, Grohme MA, Kaczmarek Ł, Schill RO, Frohme M. Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades: The last
decade. J Ins Physiol. 2011; 57 (5): 577–83.
7. Węglarska B. Studies on the morphology of Macrobiotus richtersi Murray, 1911. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol
Supplement. 1975; 32: 445–464.
8. Dewel NA, Nelson DR, Dewel WC. Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, Volume 12: Onychophora,
Chilopoda and lesser Protostomia: Tardigrada. 1993; 143–183.
9. Węglarska B. On the encystation in tardigrada. Zool Polanie. 1957; 8: 315–322.
10. Ramazzotti G, Maucci W. Il Phylum Tardigrada. Mem Istit Ital Idrobiol. 1983; 41: 1–1012
11. Szymańska B. Interdependence between storage bodies and egg developmental stages in Macrobiotus
richtersi Murray, 1911 (Tardigrada). A Biol Crac. 1994; XXXVI: 41–50.
12. Poprawa I. Ultrastructural changes of the storage cells during oogenesis in Dactylobiotus dispar (Mur-
ray, 1907) (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada). Zool Pol. 2006; 51/1-4: 13–18.
13. Jo
¨nsson KI, Rebecchi L. Experimentally induced anhydrobiosis in the tardigrade Richtersius coronifer:
phenotypic factors affecting survival. J. Exp. Zool. 2002; 293: 578–584.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 16 / 19
14. Hyra M, Rost-Roszkowska MM, Student S, Włodarczyk A, Deperas M, JaneltK et al. Body cavity cells
of Parachela during their active life. Zool J. Lin Soc. 2016b; 178(4): 878–887.
15. Reuner A, Hengherr S, Bru¨mmer F, Schill RO. Comparative studies on storage cells in tardigrades dur-
ing starvation and anhydrobiosis. Curr. Zool. 2010; 56(2): 259–263
16. Czernekova M, Jo
¨nsson KI. Experimentally induced repeated anhydrobiosis in the eutardigrade Rich-
tersius coronifer. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(11): e0164062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164062
PMID: 27828978
17. Neumann S, Reuner A, Brummer F, Schill RO. DNA damage in storage cells of anhydrobiotic tardi-
grades. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009; 153: 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cbpa.2009.04.611 PMID: 19361569
18. Guidetti R, Jo
¨nsson KI. Long-term anhydrobiotic survival in semi-terrestrial micrometazoans. Journal of
Zoology, London. 2002; 257: 181–187.
19. Rebecchi L, Guidetti R, Borsari S, Altiero T, Bertolani R. Dynamics of longterm anhydrobiotic survival of
lichen-dwelling tardigrades. Hydrobiol. 2006; 558, 23–30.
20. Rebecchi L, Boschini D, Cesari M, Lencioni V, Bertolani R, Guidetti R. Stress response of a boreo-
alpine species of tardigrade, Borealibius zetlandicus (Eutardigrada, Hypsibiidae) J Limnol. 2009a; 68
(1): 64–70.
21. Li X, Wang L. Effect of thermal acclimation on preferred temperature, avoidance temperature and lethal
thermal maximum of Macrobiotus harmsworthi Murray (Tardigrada, Macrobiotidae). J Therm Biol.
2005; 30: 443–448
22. Hengherr S, Bru¨mmer F, Schill RO. Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades and its effects on longevity traits. J
Zool. 2008; 275: 216–220.
23. Ramløv H, Westh P. Survival of the Cryptobiotic Eutardigrade Adorybiotus coronifer during cooling to
-196˚C: Effect of cooling rate, trehalose level, and short-term acclimation. Cryobiol. 1992; 29: 125–130.
24. Rahm PG. Biologische und physiologische Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Moosfauna. Z Allg Physiol. 1921;
20: 1–34
25. Ramløv H, Westh P. Cryptobiosis in eutardigrade Adorybiotus (Richtersius) coronifer: tolerance to alco-
hols, temperature and de novo protein synthesis. Zool Anz. 2001; 240: 517–523.
26. Rebecchi L, Cesari M, Altiero T, Frigieri A, Guidetti R. Survival and DNA degradation in anhydrobiotic
tardigrades. J Exp Biol. 2009b; 212: 4033–4039.
27. Westh P, Ramløv H. Trehalose accumulation in tardigrade Adorybiotus coronifer during anhydrobiosis.
J Exp Zool. 2001; 258: 303–311.
28. Rebecchi L, Altiero T, Guidetti R. Anhydrobiosis? The extreme limit of desiccation tolerance. ISJ. 2007;
4: 65–81.
29. Jo
¨nsson KI, Beltra
´n-Pardo EA, Haghdoost S, Wojcik A, Bermu
´dez-Cruz RM, Bernal Villegaz JE,
Harms-Ringdahl M. J Limnol. 2013; 72: 73–79.
30. Rebecchi L, Rossi V, Altiero T, Bertolani R, Menozzi P. Reproductive modes and genetic polymorphism
in the tardigrade Richtersius coronifer (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae). Invertebr Biol. 2003; 122 (1): 19–
27.
31. Dastych H. West Spitsbergen Tardigrada. Acta Zoologica. 1985; 28/ 3, 169–214.
32. Jo
¨nsson KI, Rabbov E, Schill RO, Harms-Ringdahl M, Rettberg P. Tardigrades survive exposure to
space in low Earth orbit. Cur Biol. 2008; 18 (17): 729–735.
33. Litwin JA. Light microscopic histochemistry on plastic sections. Prog Histo Cyto. 1985; 16: 1–84.
34. Poprawa I, Hyra M, Rost-Roszkowska MM. Germ cell clusters organization and oogenesis in the tardi-
grade Dactylobiotus parthenogeneticus Bertolani, 1982 (Eutardigrada, Murrayidae). Protoplasma.
2014; 252(4):1019–1029 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0737-6 PMID: 25433446
35. Poprawa I, Schlete-Wełnicz V, Hyra M. Ovary organization and oogenesis in the tardigrade Macrobiotus
polonicus Pilato, Kaczmarek, Michalczyk and Lisi, 2003 (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae): ultrastructural
and histochemical analysis. Protoplasma. 2015b; 252: 857–865.
36. Rost-Roszkowska MM, Poprawa I, Wojtowicz M, Kaczmarek Ł. Ultrastructural changes of the midgut
epithelium in Isohypsibius granulifer granulifer Thulin, 1928 (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada) during oogene-
sis. Protoplasma. 2011; 248(2): 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0186-9 PMID:
20661605
37. Poprawa I, Hyra M, Kszuk-Jendrysik M, Rost-Roszkowska MM. Ultrastructural changes and pro-
grammed cell death of trophocytes in the gonad of Isohypsibius granulifer granulifer Thulin, 1928 (Tardi-
grada, Eutardigrada, Isohypsibiidae). Micron. 2015a; 70: 26–33.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 17 / 19
38. Czernekova M, Jo
¨nsson KI, Chajec L, Student S, Poprawa I. The structure of the desiccated Richtersius
coronifer (Richters, 1903). Protoplasma. 2017; 254(3): 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-
016-1027-2 PMID: 27677802
39. Walz B. The morphology of cells and cell organelles in the anhydrobiotic tardigrade, Macrobiotus hufe-
landi. Protoplasma. 1979; 99: 19–30.
40. Regiorri F, Klionski DJ. Autophagosomes: biogenesis from scratch? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005; 17(4):
415–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.06.007 PMID: 15978794
41. Hyra M, Poprawa I, Włodarczyk A, Student S, Sonakowska L, Kszuk-Jendrysyk M, et. al. Ultrastructural
changes in midgut epithelium of Hypsibius dujardini (Doye
´re, 1840) (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada, Hypsibii-
dae) in relation to oogenesis. Zool J Lin Soc. 2016a; 178(4): 987–906.
42. Lewis WH. Nucleolar vacuoles in living normal and malignant fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1943; 531–536.
43. Johnson JM, Jones LE. Behavior of nucleoli and contracting nucleolar vacuoles in tobacco cells growing
in microculture. Am J Bot. 1967; 54 (2): 189–198. PMID: 6040677
44. Stępiński D. Functional ultrastructure of the plant nucleolus. Protoplasma. 2014; 251(6): 1285–306.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0648-6 PMID: 24756369
45. Jennane A, Thiry M, Diouri M, Goessens G. Fate of nucleolar vacuole during resumption of cell cycle in
pea cotyledonary buds. Protoplasma. 2000; 210 (3): 172–178.
46. Kinchin IM. An observation on the storage cells of Ramazzottius (Hypsibiidae, Eutardigrada. Queeket J
Microscopy. 1993; 37: 52–55.
47. Bertolani R. Tardigrada. Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Vol. I.: Oogenesis, Oviposition and
Oosorption. John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. 1983.
48. Nelson DR, Guidetti R, Rebecchi L. Phylum Tardigrada. In Thorp J.H., Covich A.P. Ecology and Classi-
fication of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press. 2015; 347–380.
49. Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, Møbjerg N. Desiccation tolerance in the tardigrade Richtersius coronifer
relies on muscle mediated structural reorganization. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(12): 1–10.
50. Rost-Roszkowska MM, Poprawa I, Hyra M, Marek-Swędzioł M, Kaczmarek Ł. The fine structure of the
midgut epithelium in Xerobiotus pseudohufelandi (Iharos, 1966) (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada, Macrobioti-
dae). J. Limnol. 2013; 72 (1): 54–61.
51. Halim AS, Gomathysankar S, Noor NM, Mohamed M, Periayah MH. Potential applications of different
types of adult stem cells toward medical interventions. Med Science. 2015; 4(2): 2277–8179.
52. Adamowicz A, Wojtaszek J. Morphology and phagocytotic activity of Coelomocytes in Dendrobaena
veneta (Lumbricidae). Zool Pol. 2001; 46/1–4: 91–104.
53. Hatti SS. Coelomocyte studies of three species of earthworm viz Polypheretima elongta,Perionyx san-
sibaricus and Dichogaster bolaui. Indian J App Res. 2013; 3(7): 598–601.
54. Tahseen Q. Coelomocytes: Biology and possible immune functions in invertebrates with special
remarks on nematodes. Int J Zool. 2009; 1–13.
55. Edds KT. Cell Biology of Echinoid Coelomocytes. J Invertebr Pathol. 1993; 61: 173–178.
56. Matranga V, Toia G, Bonaventura R, Mu¨ller WEG. Cellular and biochemical responses to environmental
and experimentally induced stress in sea urchin coelomocytes. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2000; 5(2):
113–120. PMID: 11147962
57. Adamowicz A. Morphology and ultrastructure of the earthworm Dedrobaena veneta (Lumbricidae) coe-
lomocytes. Tissue Cell. 2005; 37: 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2004.11.002 PMID:
15748739
58. Kasschau MR, Ngo TD, Sperber LM, Tran KL. Formation of filopodia in earthworm (Lumbricus terres-
tris) coelomocytes in response to osmotic stress. Zoology. 2007; 110: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
zool.2006.07.002 PMID: 17174079
59. Hetzel HR. Studies on holothurians coelomocytes. II. The origin on coelomocytesand the formation of
brown bodies. Biol Bull. 1965; 128: 102–111.
60. Nguyen VT, Morange M, Bensaude O. Protein denaturation during heat shock and related stress.
Escherichia coli ßgalactosidase and Photinus pyralis luciferase inactivation in mouse cells. J Biol
Chem. 1989; 264 (18): 10487–10492. PMID: 2499580
61. Lepock JR, Frey HE, Ritchie KP. Protein denaturation in intact hepatocytes and isolated cellular organ-
elles during heat shock. J Cell Biol. 1993; 122 (6): 1267–1276. PMID: 8376462
62. Wolkers WF, Tablin F, Crowe JH. From anhydrobiosis to freeze-drying of eukaryotic cells. Comp Bio-
chem Physiol Mol Integr Physiol. 2002; 131: 535–543.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 18 / 19
63. Crowe JH, Hoekstra FA, Nguyen KHN, Crowe LM. Is vitrification involved in depression of the phase
transition temperature in dry phospholipids? Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996; 1280: 187–196. PMID:
8639693
64. Balogh B, Peter M, Glatz A, Gombos I, Torok Z, Horvath I, et al. Key role of lipids in heat stress manage-
ment. FEBS letters. 2013; 587 (13): 1970–1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.016 PMID:
23684645
65. Womersley C, Thompson SN, Smith L. Anhydrobiosis in nematodes II: carbohydrate and lipid analysis
in undesiccated and desiccate nematodes. J Nemat. 1982; 14(2): 145–153.
66. Demeure Y, Freckman DW, Van Gundy SD. Anhydrobiotic coiling nematodes in soil. J Nematol. 1979;
11: 189–195. PMID: 19305555
67. Womersley C. Biochemical and physiological aspects of anhydrobiosis. Comp Biochem. Physiol. 1981;
70B: 669–678.
Storage cells in the eutardigrade R.coronifer
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201430 August 10, 2018 19 / 19
Content uploaded by K. I. Jönsson
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by K. I. Jönsson on Aug 12, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
