Conference PaperPDF Available

The Role of Knowledge Sharing on Employees' Innovation Initiatives

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Knowledge sharing (KS) is one of the pillars among the factor in knowledge management. There are numerous ways in which knowledge sharing might be beneficial to organizational productivity, competitiveness and innovative initiatives. Dialogue delivery involved during knowledge sharing, often lead to generation of new ideas, which form the ground for the nurturing of new knowledge. KS helps in marketing effectiveness and enhances organizational innovativeness. The purpose of this research is to investigate the role of employees' knowledge sharing, and to what extent KS affect their innovative thinking/ initiatives. The research will first investigate the general roles knowledge management and knowledge sharing plays on organizational performance and later focus on how the sharing of personal/individual knowledge affects the employees overall critical thinking and consequently their innovation initiatives and innovation. The research will also discuss the effects on employees' KS on groups and consequently on the group's overall innovative ideas. Generally, employees resist sharing what they know as they believe they would lose competitiveness. Such thinking not only prevents the learning within the group but also affects the employees' innovation initiatives as we posit is the only way to be more creative is to be exposed to other's ideas which in most circumstances act as triggers for ideas and innovations generation. We argue that, for innovation to happen, KS is essential key factor in the process. The paper introduced a framework which demonstrates how knowledge sharing takes place in an organization by identifying the factors required for the sharing to take place. In addition, the paper argues that these factors are the drive for and trigger employees' innovation and consequently increase organizational learning.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Role of Knowledge Sharing on Employees’ Innovation Initiatives
Neeni Masih, Narumon Sriratanaviriyakul, Jamal El-Den and Sami Azam
Charles Darwin University, Australia
Abstract. Knowledge sharing (KS) is one of the pillars among the factor in knowledge management. There
are numerous ways in which knowledge sharing might be beneficial to organizational productivity,
competitiveness and innovative initiatives. Dialogue delivery involved during knowledge sharing, often lead
to generation of new ideas, which form the ground for the nurturing of new knowledge. KS helps in
marketing effectiveness and enhances organizational innovativeness. The purpose of this research is to
investigate the role of employees’ knowledge sharing, and to what extent KS affect their innovative thinking/
initiatives. The research will first investigate the general roles knowledge management and knowledge
sharing plays on organizational performance and later focus on how the sharing of personal/individual
knowledge affects the employees overall critical thinking and consequently their innovation initiatives and
innovation. The research will also discuss the effects on employees’ KS on groups and consequently on the
group’s overall innovative ideas. Generally, employees resist sharing what they know as they believe they
would lose competitiveness. Such thinking not only prevents the learning within the group but also affects
the employees’ innovation initiatives as we posit is the only way to be more creative is to be exposed to
other’s ideas which in most circumstances act as triggers for ideas and innovations generation. We argue that,
for innovation to happen, KS is essential key factor in the process. The paper introduced a framework which
demonstrates how knowledge sharing takes place in an organization by identifying the factors required for
the sharing to take place. In addition, the paper argues that these factors are the drive for and trigger
employees’ innovation and consequently increase organizational learning.
Keywords: knowledge sharing, innovation, knowledge management
1. Introduction
Increased requirement for flexibility and speed in production associated with constant drop in technology
prices remains critical issues compelling today’s organizations to compete in fast customer satisfaction to
gain market competitiveness. In order to attain a strong market position, organizations are forced to
constantly strive for innovative ideas for their services and products, hence increase their employees’ sharing
of their knowledge as a means to ensure new idea generation. Innovation is a significant variable for all
business units today, which relies mainly on efficient knowledge management and knowledge sharing
amongst employees [1]. The nurture of employee’s ideas through communication and exchange of expertise
is a decisive factor in promoting new innovative ideas. The paper highlights on these factors and seeks to
investigate the role of knowledge sharing in improving employees’ innovation initiatives.
2. Background
Hislop [2] posited that knowledge should be regarded as a key determinant of a long term survival of
today’s organizations. However, the efficient management and sharing amongst employees also plays a
crucial and primary role in attaining a competitive edge. Considerable studies have focused on this domain
trying to identify the relationship between knowledge management and innovation. Based on previous
researchers’ work, the effective adoption and implementation of knowledge creation, sharing, future usage
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: jamal.el-den@cdu.edu.au
697
Proceedings of 2018 the 8th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering
(WCSE 2018)
ISBN
978-981-11-7861-0
Bangkok, 28-30 June, 2018, pp.6 9 7-7 04
and management is essential and crucial for efficient use of employees’ know-how if organizations are to
achieve competitiveness. Although most research focused on knowledge management in its entirety, less
research addressed the role of employees’ knowledge sharing on organizations productivity and
innovativeness.
Accordingly, effective knowledge sharing has varied implications on the company’ performance as it
directly affects business units growth potential, motivates employees and exposes them to varied skills and
information, generates new ideas, increases operational efficiency, limits skill gap and creates a sense of
purpose amongst employees [3]. These aspects in turn accentuate knowledge, experiences and employees’
ability, making them more capable to develop innovative business processes for better growth [4]. Current
research lacks providing answers to how value creation capabilities can be increased as a result of effective
knowledge sharing that remains crucial for greater innovation and this research will try to address this gap.
3. Issues in Knowledge Sharing
Knowledge management is a process of capturing organizational goals with the help of strategy driven
motivations, as well as providing facilities of managing knowledge to workers, so that they can enhance their
capability to investigate data and information through different available sources of information, experience,
know-how, culture, etc [5].
There usually are insufficient HRD professionals in jobs because they outnumbered the employees, and
therefore are unable to provide the best knowledge to all the employees [6]. The majority of researchers fail
to understand the needs of the employees and they cannot provide effective and efficient methods of
preaching knowledge to their employees. Communication gap is another major aspect that often leads to
ineffective knowledge sharing among the employees. Due to the extreme competition, employees tend not to
share the knowledge with other employees and this leads decrease in organizational innovation initiatives [7].
Most organizations have vertical hierarchy, which creates a barrier in communication between employees
and higher management. Fear among the employees is mainly due to inferiority complex and employees are
not willing to share knowledge with their superiors [8]. Moreover, body language is another reason for
communication gap among the employees and this ultimately leads to mistrust among the employees. The
employees with higher knowledge often do not share with other employees and this leads to knowledge gap.
Consequently, sharing is not a by-product within organizations and it advocates for a cultural change in the
organization as well as closing the gap between employees and higher management. Employees must be
encouraged to share, and this can only be done if the employees feel “safe” to do so.
3.1. Critical Analysis of the Importance of Knowledge Management and Its Impact on
Organizational Performance
Most organizations are knowledge-based, where, the information and knowledge available to
organizations are regarded as essential and critical resources [9]. Knowledge is also considered to be a core
competence and a major performance driver for most organizations. Thus, a significant key for value
creation within the business comes from placing considerable emphasis on generating and managing
knowledge. Knowledge management is the integrated process of knowledge creation, transfer, storage and
management [10]. This multidisciplinary approach is regarded as the most important aspect for business,
which caters to fulfill major organizational objectives through continuous improvement and innovation. Thus,
knowledge management mainly focuses on efforts towards improved performance, sharing of experiences
and learned lessons and competitive advantage, which often overlap with organizational learning. Effective
knowledge management affects and facilitates decision making capabilities, stimulates innovation and
cultural change and builds a learning culture within organization [11]. All three-core advantages directly
impact upon organizational performance and productivity. Valid and critical knowledge is essential because
the knowledge received by the employee would be applied by the employees in the field of work [4].
Ineffective and vague knowledge would hamper the employee’s performance thereby reducing the efficiency
of the company’s performance. Hence, proper identification of valid knowledge is crucial before the
employees are trained with it. Employees, if properly trained with the knowledge of work, will effectively
improve the performance of the employee in a better way [3]. Hence, there is a direct link between the
698
knowledge gain and employee performance as sharing of knowledge from one employee to another improves
the overall performance of an organization [12]. Proper knowledge improves the innovative ideas of the
employees and helps the employees to create new ideas for the betterment of the job.
3.2. Knowledge Management, Innovation and Cultural Change
Efficient knowledge management and knowledge sharing generates and encourages free flow of ideas. It
actively manages data and information available to all employees and increases their capability to use
induced knowledge to create more efficient business plans. Teams benefits from knowledge of other
employees and individual skills, which increases expertise and power of overall workforce [13]. Varying
backgrounds and cultural differences between employees also accentuates this trend leading to a more
desirable stimulus for growth. Effective knowledge management with the help of systematic and collective
processes also decrease tendency of employees to repeat and commit same mistakes. This dramatically
increases and improves quality of services and products. Better knowledge regarding customer needs,
stakeholder needs, industry needs and employee needs also increases capability of workers to strategically
develop efficient and suitable policies and strike a balance between interests of all stakeholders to attain
greater business results [14]. Thus, this culture for change facilitates innovation and allows employees to
respond faster, thus providing organizations a competitive advantage over others. Ecological knowledge
management theory gains attention here. It stresses on relationships, people and various learning
communities in relation to knowledge management. It also emphasizes on multiple interactions between and
amongst employees and companies and critical external and internal factors influencing and drawing people
closer to engage in effective knowledge sharing. However, Obeidat et al. [15] argued that knowledge
management systems are mainly complex and costly. Hence, many small business units are unable to
implement such strategies for business gains. Scholars also stressed on the fact that sufficient skill and
knowledge is required to handle and use knowledge management systems. Thus, for collecting and recording
right data suitably, employees must first be trained.
3.3. The Effects of Knowledge Sharing on Organizational Learning Culture
A proper knowledge management system helps in generating a learning culture as it creates an
environment where all workers continuously engage in self-assessment and seeks to find effective ways for
improvement [10]. This strategy and culture helps employees to better identify their loopholes, disadvantages
and advantages, which lays down specific paths for better performance in the future. Even though most
scholars agreed with this claim, many also identified possible disadvantages and negative aspects of
knowledge management. Many organizations tend to create a repository of information that mainly remains
disregarded and useless [11]. Absence of stimulus for an appropriate knowledge base and absence of
practical benefit develops a vicious circle within knowledge management processes that in turn tends to harm
organizational effectiveness. It is essential for an organization to constantly upgrade products and services in
order to spread the company worldwide and create innovations [7]. Therefore, it is essential to properly train
the employees with adequate knowledge and also update the employees with new technologies and services
so that the organization can constantly upgrade [6]. Organizational learning culture constantly encourages
new technologies and systems and affects the knowledge sharing. New use of techniques requires proper
education and knowledge and will effectively improve the overall performance of the organization.
Organizational learning culture enables the employees to understand the disadvantages and inefficiencies of
the employees and will eventually help the employees to improve the performance [8].
4. Factors Affecting Knowledge Management
Innovation remains the greatest payoff of a suitable knowledge management strategy [1]. However,
various factors influence the success of knowledge management initiatives. These factors include culture,
technology, organizational adjustment, leadership, knowledge resources, employee motivation and
willingness to share, knowledge activities and various other external factors. All such factors can be broadly
classified as managerial influences, environmental influences and resource influences.
699
Table 1: Summary of current literary factors considered vital for organizational knowledge sharing and innovation
Literature
Factors considered
Knowledge
management
practices &
innovation
performance: a
literature
review [16]
Knowledge management plays an important role in creative thinking.
Leadership, policies and strategies lead to increase or decrease the innovation.
Centralized leadership is direct way of innovation.
Emphasizing of mentoring and training employees to create knowledge is not helpful in
innovation.
To employees being regularly innovative, organizations should be always supportive
towards their efforts of learning and gaining new knowledge.
Reward system can also be helpful in employees being innovative
Innovation is increased by communication, and through exchanging of ideas and
information, therefore quick feedback and trust can help in improving it.
Intellectual
Stimulation
Effects on
Knowledge
Sharing,
Innovation and
Firm
Performance
[17]
Top management support leads to knowledge sharing in an organization
Intellectual stimulation as one dimension of transformational leadership has dedicated and
concise impact on experiential sharing and explicit knowledge sharing.
Explicit knowledge conducted by employees results in innovation in organizations
Creativity can be increase by sharing of reports hence increases creating new products.
Sharing of past experience among employees has no effect on product innovation.
Psychological barriers that restricted to share knowledge can be improved by intellectual
stimulation of transformational leaders for managerial implication
Intellectual stimulation can be increased in an organization by focus group discussions
within organization regularly.
Knowledge
Management
and the
Effectiveness of
Innovation
Outcomes: The
Role of Cultural
Barriers [18]
Knowledge management strategies (explicit-tacit oriented and external-internal oriented)
improves the knowledge base.
Innovation-knowledge Link can be improved through cultural barrier.
Innovation can be distracted in organization through cultural aspects like conflict among
employees, decrement of motivation and resistance to change.
As per many researches, cultural barriers are in charge of advancement of learning
through exploitation, towards the accomplishment of the particular organizational
objective. Therefore, they increase compliance than innovation.
Inability of organizational to remove cultural barriers, make the organizations unable to
invent, explain and explore new knowledge and hence upcoming opportunities. There
should be effective organizational environment for employees to stand against the cultural
barriers.
Mediating Role
Of Knowledge
Sharing On
Information
Technology
And Innovation
[19]
Information technology has effective result on knowledge sharing.
Knowledge sharing leads to organization innovation
Innovativeness is the root to success in the ongoing business and competitiveness.
To boost innovation in organization, both tacit and explicit knowledge are needed.
Transforming tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge leads to innovation in organization.
Information technology can be considered as organizational factor to increase knowledge
sharing and innovation.
IT infrastructure employee’s knowledge of IT should regularly be in order to increase the
knowledge sharing of employees and thus increase the product and process innovation.
Investment in R&D of the organization
Knowledge
sharing and
firm innovation
capability: an
empirical study
[20]
Individual factors are directly related with knowledge sharing process.
The increment of level of the enjoyment by the management leads to a better knowledge
sharing since employees can happily help each other and knowledge sharing occurs
Managers should encourage social exchange which would help towards developing and
sustaining new knowledge.
Managers should give feedback in order to improve knowledge-self efficacy of
employees.
Facility of knowledge sharing by top management is necessary.
Reward system like incentives, bonus does not lead to more knowledge sharing.
Extrinsic rewards increase creative thinking initiatives of employees.
Based on the discussions of the factors in Table 1, we developed a framework (Table 2) taking into
account the above identified factors based on employees’ intentions/ willingness to share, medium of
knowledge sharing and form of innovation.
700
Table 2: Factors based on intention/willingness to share, knowledge sharing and form of innovation
Intention/willingness to share
Medium of sharing
Support from management
Intellectual stimulation
Explicit knowledge
Transformation leaders
Reports and documents
Dialogue delivery of experience
Group discussion
Leadership and policies and
strategies
Innovative culture and room
Decrement of training and
mentoring
Supporting organizational system
and structures
Reward System
Communication
Feedback and trust
Information and Ideas
Information Technology
High cost in R&D investment
Training programs in IT
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Transforming Tacit knowledge to
explicit knowledge
LAN system
Intranet
Video conferencing System
Social Network
Product innovation
Process Innovation
Cultural barriers
Existence of conflict among
individual
Lack of motivation
Resistance to change
Removal of cultural barrier
(knowledge sharing atmosphere)
Sharing of information and
ideas and experience
Increase level of enjoyment
Increase social
exchange (i.e. enjoyment in
helping others)
Provide useful feedback to
improve employee
knowledge self-efficacy
Top management’s facilitation of
knowledge sharing
Helping others (dialogue
delivery)
Table 3 identifies common and uncommon factors in respect to intention or willingness to share
knowledge and Table 4 depicts common and uncommon factors in respect to medium/platform to share
Table 3: Common and uncommon factors in respect to intention/willingness to share knowledge
Common factors
Uncommon factors
Top management support
Reward system
Feedback to employees or motivation
Leadership
Enjoyment satisfaction (happiness/enjoyment)
Cultural barriers
Conflict among individuals
Information technology
High investment in R&D investment
Decrement of training and mentoring
Table 4: Common and uncommon factors in respect to medium/platform to share
Common factors
Uncommon factors
Dialogue delivery
Reports and documents
Sharing experience
Intranet
Videoconferencing system
Social network
Removal of cultural barriers
5. Proposed Research Framework
The research’s framework is drawn from a comparative analysis of current literature where prominent
authors have identified factors, some are used often (common) and some are not (uncommon), which affect
employees’ innovation as well as their innovation initiatives as a result of increasing their incentives and
willingness to share and consequently their knowledge sharing. The framework highlights these factors and
701
identifies those factors that are common among most of the researchers as well as those that are not common
and which are uniquely addressed in this paper. The framework was developed based on these factors and
shows how they affect the employees’ intentions as well as their willingness to share. The framework also
added the media/platform for the sharing and how combined with the factors would affect the employees’
intentions to share as currently the “media”, which ever it is, plays an integral role in the employees
communication, knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and consequently has a vital role on increasing the
employees’ willingness to share what they know.
The framework illustrates literary factors which are frequently used by researchers (common factors) to
promote employees intention/willingness and highlights which are not frequently used (uncommon factors)
which also have effects on the employees’ intention/willingness to share along with media/ platform of
sharing. In addition, we introduced new types such as, intranet and social networking which had not been
addressed previously. We posit that including media/ platform as factors which promote intention/
willingness to share is integral for better investigation of the employees’ willingness to share and to innovate.
Other factors that can be directly responsible for boosting up the innovation capabilities of employees and let
the innovation happen in organization can be employee’s incentives to innovate. It has been investigated on
basis of existing finding that incentives could anything accept the money itself, that could be promotions,
tours etc. The reason behind eliminating the money for incentives is that after a period of time employees’
expectations regarding additional rewards grew as well, which ultimately results in unsatisfied employees
and zero outcomes for organization.
The framework shows the effects and relationships of the identified common/uncommon factors and the
medium/platform, on employees’ innovation and knowledge sharing in organizations (Figure 1).
Hypothesis 1: Common factors increase the employee’s intention/ willingness to share.
Hypothesis 2: Uncommon factors increase the employee’s intention/ willingness to share.
Hypothesis 3: Common factors positively affect Media/platform adoption for Knowledge Sharing
Hypothesis 4: Uncommon factors positively affect Media/platform adoption for KS
Hypothesis 5: The adoption of Media/Platform positively increases the employees’ knowledge sharing
intention and/or willingness
Hypothesis 6: The employees’ intention/willingness to share what they know increases the knowledge
sharing
Hypothesis 7: The adoption of Media/Platform for knowledge sharing among employees positively affects
their overall knowledge sharing
Hypothesis 8a: The existence of incentive for sharing increases the sharing among employees
Hypothesis 8b: the existence of incentives to share increases employees’ innovation capabilities
Hypothesis 9: knowledge sharing promotes employees’ innovation capabilities
Fig. 1: Proposed research framework.
702
6. Conclusion
The paper investigated the role of knowledge sharing in promoting organizational innovativeness. It
provided a summary the factors which prominent authors have identified which, in their opinion, affect the
innovation initiatives and innovation in general in organizations. The paper also introduced some uncommon
factors which are either poorly addressed or never addressed in the literature which also have effects on
employees’ innovative initiatives. Based on these factors, the paper introduced a framework which shows the
relationship between these factors, their link to employees’ knowledge sharing incentives and willingness as
well as on their overall knowledge sharing. The paper posits that employees should be given incentives by
the management in order to increase both their knowledge sharing and innovative capabilities. The paper
also posits that there are factors which are integral in increasing employees’ intentions and willingness to
share and introduced these factors. In addition, the paper stressed that the choice of medium of knowledge
sharing and a supportive platform will also reflects positively on the employees’ innovation.
7. References
[1] Fischer, M.M. and J. Fröhlich, Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems. 2013: Springer Science & Business
Media.
[2] Hislop, D., Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. 2013: Oxford University Press.
[3] Alegre, J., K. Sengupta, and R. Lapiedra, Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech
SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 2013. 31(4): p. 454-470.
[4] Noruzy, A., et al., Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge
management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of
manufacturing firms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013. 64 (5-8): p. 1073-
1085.
[5] Sriratanaviriyakul, N. and J. El-Den, A Conceptual Model for Knowledge Sharing Among Small Groups Using
Discussion Cases. International Journal of Computing Academic Research (IJCAR), 2016. 5(4): p. 177-186.
[6] Bammer, G., A. Michaux, and A. Sanson, Bridging the'Know-Do'Gap: Knowledge brokering to improve child
wellbeing. 2013: ANU Press.
[7] Fukuda-Parr, S. and C. Lopes, Capacity for development: new solutions to old problems. 2013: Routledge.
[8] Epstein, M.J. and A.R. Buhovac, Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring
corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. 2014: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[9] Urbancova, H., Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of
Competitiveness, 2013. 5(1).
[10] Garriga, H., G. Von Krogh, and S. Spaeth, How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic
Management Journal, 2013. 34(9): p. 1134-1144.
[11] Donate, M.J. and J.D.S. de Pablo, The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices
and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 2015. 68(2): p. 360-370.
[12] Becerra-Fernandez, I. and R. Sabherwal, Knowledge management: Systems and processes. 2014: Routledge.
[13] Lai, Y.-L., et al., The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. Journal of
Business Research, 2014. 67(5): p. 734-739.
[14] Meihami, B. and H. Meihami, Knowledge Management a way to gain a competitive advantage in firms (evidence
of manufacturing companies). International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 2014. 3: p. 80-91.
[15] Obeidat, B.Y., et al., The impact of knowledge management on innovation: An empirical study on Jordanian
consultancy firms. Management Research Review, 2016. 39(10): p. 1214-1238.
[16] Githii, S., Knowledge management practices and innovation performance: a literature review. Journal of Business
and Management (IOSR-JBM), 2014. 16(2): p. 89-94.
[17] Utami, M.M., How intellectual stimulation effects knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance.
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2013. 3(4): p. 420.
703
[18] Leal-Rodríguez, A., et al., Knowledge Management and the Effectiveness of Innovation Outcomes: The Role of
Cultural Barriers. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013. 11(1): p. 62-71.
[19] Kaewchur, O., P. Anussornnitisarn, and Z. Pastuszak, The mediating role of knowledge sharing on information
technology and innovation. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 2013. 2(2): p. 227-
242.
[20] Lin, H.-F., Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of
manpower, 2007. 28(3/4): p. 315-332.
704
... Increasing employees" knowledge sharing, as a means to generate new ideas, is considered vital for the organizations which are striving to innovate products and services, achieve competitive advantages and attain a strong market position (Masih, Sriratanaviriyakul, El-Den, & Azam, 2018;Ologbo, Nor, & Okyere-Kwakye, 2015). "Creativity and innovation at work are the process, outcomes, and products of attempts to develop and introduce new and improved ways of doing things." ...
... The employee"s ideas are nurtured through communication and exchange of expertise that are substantial for stimulating innovative ideas (Masih et al., 2018). Both the knowledge denoting and knowledge collecting play an important influence on employee's innovative behaviour (Hassan et al., 2018). ...
... Based on the review conducted by Githii, (2014), there is overwhelming evidence showing that knowledge management practices play a significant role in innovation and suggest that employee innovation should be supported by organizational systems and structures that encourage their efforts to learn and acquire new knowledge. Also, Masih et al. (2018) content in their study that knowledge sharing promotes employees" innovation capabilities and the employees should be given incentives by the management in order to increase both their knowledge sharing and innovative capabilities. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
It is widely recognized that knowledge sharing contributes to innovation in organizations. The implicit assumption in the linkage between individual knowledge sharing and their innovative work behaviour is that individuals gain certain qualities while being engaged in knowledge sharing that enable them to become more innovative. In this paper, we explore employee task knowledge as a key mediator in the relationship between knowledge sharing and their innovative work behaviour. Data collected from knowledge workers from several manufacturing and service based organizations is used to test the mediation hypotheses. Results support our mediation hypothesis and show that task knowledge partially mediates knowledge sharing"s impact on innovative work behaviour. Knowledge sharing had a positive impact on innovative work behaviour even after considering task knowledge as a mediator, suggesting other mechanisms at work in addition to their task knowledge in how knowledge sharing contributes to innovation. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are also discussed.
... According to Githii's [93] research, there is compelling evidence that knowledge management practices play a pivotal role in innovation, and that employee innovation should be encouraged by organizational processes and structures that support their attempts to learn and acquire new knowledge. In addition, Masih et al. [95] state in their research that knowledge-sharing stimulates employees to innovate, and that management should provide incentives for employees to develop both their knowledge-sharing and innovative potential. The authors' findings revealed that knowledge-sharing behavior had a positive impact on innovative work behavior and advised leaders to focus on developing innovative behaviors in employees throughout their everyday job by promoting knowledge-sharing. ...
Article
Full-text available
Customer knowledge management (CKM) is a relatively new research domain, aiming at exploring the potential of customer knowledge for the open innovation process of companies. The present paper aims at performing a complex analysis of the serial mediation phenomenon of the impact of CKM on sustainable product innovation (SPI) by innovative work behavior (IWB). The dimensions considered for IWB in the present research are the following: idea exploration, idea generation, idea championing, and idea implementation. In the first phase of our research, we performed a semantic analysis of the main concepts, ideas, and theories, based on a critical literature review. Thus, we reached a deeper understanding of the complexity of the concept of knowledge by learning the theory of knowledge fields and knowledge dynamics. As a result of this conceptual phase, we designed the research model and a questionnaire to be addressed to managers from the business environment. In the quantitative phase of the present research, we used the statistical software packages, SPSS version 26.0, and the PROCESS macro for SPSS, version 3.5. We used well-known criteria for reliability, validation, and interpretation of the numerical results. The final results demonstrate a significant serial mediation phenomenon regarding the impact of CKM on SPI by the IWB. These results are important in developing the co-creation process of new products by using customer knowledge. The present research reveals some original ideas concerning the impact of CKM on SPI by using a serial mediation process performed by basic innovative work dimensions. The implications of the present research are significant for both academics and practitioners in designing open innovation in knowledge ecosystems.
... Therefore, employees will resist organizational innovation. Masih et al. (2018) indicated that employees believed that knowledge is their using value. If they easily share, their use value will decrease, and the organization will lose competitiveness. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study is to explore when leaders of manufacturing companies in China adopt high-performance work system (HPWS) and authoritarian leadership to pressure employees to maintain their intention toward organizational innovation improvement. These two approaches can trigger employee resistance and further affect innovation and financial performance. We collected data through the responses of 224 manufacturing companies in China. Regarding the methodology, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and partial least squares (PLS) regression are the primary methods used. Our findings indicate that employees’ resistance as a moderator certainly affects the relationship between improving organizational innovation and achieving innovative performance, which also affects financial performance. In addition, authoritarian leadership will lead to employees’ resistance. However, if leaders adopt HPWS to promote employees’ intention toward innovation improvement, although there is a lack of direction between HPWS and employees’ resistance, employee resistance can still be triggered if leaders lack commitment. In this contribution, the research results not only remind the leaders of manufacturing companies in China to reconsider whether to adopt a new approach or to combine their current approach with a commitment to redesigning HPWS to promote employees’ intention toward organizational innovation but also remind leaders of manufacturing companies from other countries to change their approach to addressing employees’ intention toward innovation improvement when the environment, culture, or personality traits change.
Article
Full-text available
Discussion cases are commonly used at business schools because of their pedagogical values as they expose students to real-life situations through a comprehensive interaction and collaboration among students and their instructors as well as enabling students to be proficient in communication, self-management, decision-making and problem-solving skills. In this research, discussion cases were developed by instructors in collaboration with the industry as educational supports to expose students to real-life business situations and challenges. The paper focuses on the knowledge capture, sharing, and retention during the students' group work in a semester-long project where they use these pedagogical discussion cases to solve problems, which had already been solved in real life. The paper introduces a conceptual framework for knowledge sharing behavior and its potential effects on the students' learning experience during a semester long project. The framework provides the infrastructure for the capture/sharing of knowledge during the students' quest of find solutions to the discussion cases as well as showing the effect of knowledge sharing on the students' intension to share what they know. It also examines the effects of the involvement of the instructors as well as representatives from local industry on improving the students' knowledge sharing. The paper also discusses the hypotheses which have been developed to test the validity of the framework. Little prior research has carried out with such an integrated analysis, especially in the educational context. This paper will have significant value in designing higher education class settings to involve students' teamwork and industry engagement to enhance knowledge sharing.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate the relationship between information technology, knowledge sharing, and a firm’s innovation. Knowledge sharing as a mediating effect is also simultaneously investigated with regard to the relationship between information technology and a firm’s innovation. In this research, the quantitative method was mainly employed. The data was collected with a survey. A total of 224 respondents from herbal manufacturing companies were included in the research. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that knowledge sharing and information technology can critically influence the organization’s innovation and can play a vital role as a significant success factor in this process.
Article
Full-text available
In today’s highly competitive environment the goal of each organisation is to defeat competition and win new customers. Individuals who are holders of knowledge represent a tool for the generation of innovations. Thanks to their personal creativity, their knowledge, skills and abilities it is possible to generate new innovative ideas that will help organisations to achieve a competitiveadvantage. The aim of the article is to present the findings of a survey targeted at innovations and to identify knowledge as an important element in the process of innovations. Primary data were obtained through a questionnaire survey carried out in organisations in the Czech Republic and evaluated using the tools of descriptive statistics and also the methods of comparison, induction, deduction and synthesis were applied. One of the conclusions of the article is that organisations find it important to innovate and support an innovative culture. Knowledge too is very significant in the innovation process since it represents not only important input, but also output of the transformation process.
Article
Full-text available
Knowledge as the basis of competition is the most important factor and the knowledge, innovations also Technology and knowledge based companies as the most important factor for survival is known. Knowledge Process Entrepreneurship, the creation of knowledge and the conversion of products and services through innovation. The most basic feature of Intelligent Organizations twenty-first century, the emphasis on knowledge and information. Unlike previous organizations, organizations advanced technologies today, require Acquisition, management and exploitation of knowledge and information to improve efficiency, manage and track Variations are endless. Knowledge is a powerful tool that can change the world And innovations made possible. Knowledge management is an interdisciplinary business model with all aspects of knowledge creation, Coding, sharing and using knowledge to enhance learning and innovation in the context of the company and Is working. This study developed a questionnaire and send it to companies located in the industrial town managers found that knowledge management has an impact on the surface of the competitive advantage's Knowledge management and competitive advantage, Innovation , Organizational performance, Customer satisfaction, The study variables were. Ranged the in 2,013th were tested. The results indicate that Knowledge management has made a significant competitive advantage.
Book
Most companies today have some commitment to corporate social responsibility, but implementing these initiatives can be particularly challenging. While a lot has been written on ethical and strategic factors, there is still a dearth of information on the practical nuts and bolts. And whereas with most other organizational initiatives the sole objective is improved financial performance, sustainability broadens the focus to include social and environmental performance, which is much more difficult to measure. Now updated throughout with new examples and new research, this is a complete guide to implementing and measuring the effectiveness of sustainability initiatives. It draws on Marc Epstein's and new coauthor Adriana Rejc Buhovac's solid academic foundation and extensive consulting work and includes best practices from dozens of companies in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, Australia, and Africa. This is the ultimate how-to guide for corporate leaders, strategists, academics, sustainability consultants, and anyone else with an interest in actually putting sustainability ideas into practice and making sure they accomplish their goals.
Article
Purpose – The paper aims to examine the effect of knowledge management processes (knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization) and knowledge management approaches (social network, codification and personalization) on innovation in Jordanian consultancy firms. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire that targets 266 respondents resulted in 216 usable ones with a response rate of 81.2 per cent. To test the research hypotheses, a multiple regression analysis was conducted, in addition to descriptive statistics that provide a background about the respondents. Findings – The analysis showed that there is a significant and positive impact of knowledge management processes on innovation in Jordanian consulting firms, as well as a significant and positive effect of codification and personalization approaches on innovation, while the social network approach has a significant negative impact with innovation. Originality/value – This is the first study that examines the effect of knowledge management processes (knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization) and knowledge management approaches (social network, codification and personalization) on innovation in Jordanian consultancy firms. Keywords Marketing, Innovation, Jordan, Knowledge management, Knowledge sharing, Management, Quantitative analysis, Consultancy firms Paper type Research paper
Book
This text serves as a complete introduction to the subject of knowledge management, incorporating technical, and social aspects of knowledge management, as well as practical examples, traditional approaches, and emerging topics.