Content uploaded by Tao Li
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Tao Li on Sep 22, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
1/30
Deep Learning-based Human-Driven Vehicle Trajectory
Prediction and its Application for Platoon Control of
Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
Lei Lin1Siyuan Gong1Tao Li2
1NEXTRANS Center
Purdue University
2Department of Computer Science
Purdue University
Automated Vehicles Symposium, 2018
1 / 30
4/30
Problem Description
Predict the leading Human-driven Vehicle’s (HDV) trajectory for
platoon control of CAVs.
4 / 30
6/30
Motivation-Mixed Traffic Flow
Long transition period to a fully Connected and Autonomous Vehicle
(CAV) environment.
All new vehicles will have the connectivity function until 2025 (GSMA,
2013).
75% of vehicles will be autonomous until 2040 (IEEE, 2012).
6 / 30
7/30
Motivation-Data-driven Model
Most vehicle trajectory prediction models are parsimonious.
Provide analytical conclusions and fast simulation speed.
Limited model flexibility and accuracy.
For example, car following models in traffic simulation studies rely on
artificial parameters in empirical equations.
Trajectory data from CAVs in the communication range can help to
predict the HDV’s trajectory.
7 / 30
9/30
Data Set and and Preprocessing
Next Generation Simulation
(NGSIM) Data Set:
500 meters long, 4:00
PM-4:15 PM, 04/13/2005,
I-80.
Lateral and longitudinal
locations, VehID, Time Step,
Velocity, Acceleration,
Preceding VehID, LaneID by
10 Hz.
Reconstructed data were
downloaded (Punzo et al.,
2011).
1
1https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/06137/index.cfm
9 / 30
10/30
Data Set and and Preprocessing
Data Preprocessing Steps:
CAV Market Penetration Rate: 50%.
For lane 2, 3, and 4, find the Ego CAV and HDV pairs, and for each
pair, find 3 CAVs in the front 300 meters from left, current, and right
lanes separately.
Record the time step, lane location, speed, acceleration rate, vehicle
length for the Ego CAV, the HDV and 9 CAVs.
10 / 30
12/30
Model Building
2
The Long Short-term Memory Model (LSTM).
Designed for Sequencial Data.
Consists of LSTM Cells, each cell has an input gate, forget gate and
output gate.
Automatically memorizing relevant spatial and temporal features
extracted from previous vehicle states.
2http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/
12 / 30
13/30
Model Building
Experimental Environment:
GTX 1080, Tensorflow.
LSTM Architecture:
Learning rate: 0.001.
LSTM cell number:100.
Mini-batch size: 100.
Hidden units in each cell: 400.
Early stopping threshold: 100.
Data Set:
Training dataset size:
29376 X 7750.
Validation dataset size:
9792 X 7750.
Testing dataset size:
9792 X 7750.
13 / 30
15/30
Results-LSTM Prediction Performances
Table 1: RMSE of Testing Data Sest.
Number of CAVs Prediction Steps
10 50
3 CAVs 0.67 0.72
9 CAVs 0.71 0.72
Table 2: Normalized RMSE of Testing Data Sest. (1-RMSE/MEAN)
Number of CAVs Prediction Steps
10 50
3 CAVs 95.40% 95.11%
9 CAVs 95.19% 95.01%
15 / 30
16/30
Results-LSTM Prediction Performances
RMSE by HDV ID (268 HDVs)
10 Prediction Steps with 3 CAVs 50 Prediction Steps with 3 CAVs
16 / 30
17/30
Results-LSTM Prediction Performances
The Minimum and Maximum RMSEs for one Round of Prediction (10
Prediction Steps with 3 CAVs)
17 / 30
18/30
Results-LSTM Prediction Performances
The Minimum and Maximum RMSEs for one Round of Prediction (50
Prediction Steps with 3 CAVs)
18 / 30
19/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Select two representative HDVs, assume each is followed by a platoon of 9
CAVs, apply the P-step Model Predictive Control (MPC) (Gong and Du,
2018):
Table 3: RMSEs of Two HDVs.
HDV Prediction Steps
10 50
2973 0.56 0.64
3307 0.94 0.94
19 / 30
20/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact of MPC on the speed of the CAV platoon following HDV 2973:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 20 / 30
21/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact on the acceleration rate of the CAV platoon following HDV 2973:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 21 / 30
22/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact on the spacing of the CAV platoon following HDV 2973:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 22 / 30
23/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Select two representative HDVs, assume each is followed by a platoon of 9
CAVs, apply the P-step Model Predictive Control (MPC) (Gong and Du,
2018):
Table 4: RMSEs of Two HDVs.
HDV Prediction Steps
10 50
2973 0.56 0.64
3307 0.94 0.94
23 / 30
24/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact of MPC on the speed of the CAV platoon following HDV 3307:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 24 / 30
25/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact on the acceleration rate of the CAV platoon following HDV 3307:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 25 / 30
26/30
Results-CAV Platoon Control Performances
Impact on the spacing of the CAV platoon following HDV 3307:
10-step predictions
50-step predictions 26 / 30
27/30
Summary
Contributions
Utilized information from multiple vehicles to predict the HDV’s
acceleration rates.
Applied the state-of-the-art LSTM deep learning model for
multiple-step-ahead predictions.
Based on our predictions, MPC Control can ensure both transient
traffic smoothness and asymptotic stability of the CAV platoon.
Limitations
Assumption of ”connected”.
Assumption of ”automated”.
27 / 30
28/30
Next Steps
Further clean the dataset.
Build the CNN-LSTM model.
Test other platoon control algorithms.
Evaluate the performances under different CAV MPRs, CV
communication ranges and delay and so on.
Predict a distribution of the acceleration rate and capture the
uncertainty.
28 / 30
29/30
References
GSMA, 2013. Eevery New Car Connected by 2025 as Embedded
Mobile Mobile Technology Drives Growth of Connected Car Market.
IEEE, 2012.
https://www.ieee.org/about/news/2012/5september-2-2012.html
(accessed 6.1.18).
Punzo, V., Borzacchiello, M.T. and Ciuffo, B., 2011. On the
assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the
Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data. Transportation
Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(6), pp.1243-1262.
Siyuan Gong and Lili Du. 2018. Cooperative Platoon Control for a
Mixed Traffic Flow Including Human Drive Vehicles and Connected
and Autonomous Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B:
Methodological. Accepted.
29 / 30
30/30
Thanks for your attentions!
Any questions?
30 / 30