Content uploaded by Kim Amer
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kim Amer on Feb 02, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
AUGUST 2018, VOL. 22 NO. 4 CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING 377CJON.ONS.ORG
SUPPORTIVE CARE ASSOCIATE EDITOR JOSEPH D. TARIMAN, PhD, RN, ANPBC, FAAN
Bibliotherapy
Appraisal of evidence for patients diagnosed with cancer
Ryan Malibiran, MSN, RN, Joseph D. Tariman, PhD, RN, ANP-BC, FAAN, and Kim Amer, PhD, RN
A 36-year-old yoga trainer,
E.A., was referred to a
breast cancer specialist in
a large academic medical
center in the Midwestern
United States for further evaluation and
consultation on treatment options for her
newly diagnosed right breast cancer. Two
weeks earlier, E.A. had a routine mammo-
gram that showed a new right breast mass.
Diagnostic mammogram and ultrasound of
the right breast confirmed this mass with no
suspicious lymphadenopathy. E.A.’s right
breast mass biopsy demonstrated grade 3
infiltrating ductal carcinoma, which was
weakly estrogen receptor–positive (1%–
10%), progesterone receptor–negative, and
HER2– by immunohistochemistry and flu-
orescent in situ hybridization techniques.
The Ki-67 index of the cancer cells was
90%. A genomic test revealed a high-risk
breast cancer subtype. Magnetic resonance
imaging of the right breast showed a 3.5 cm
x 3.2 cm x 2.1 cm mass in the right breast
with no lymph node enlargement and no
cortical thickening. Positron-emission
tomography showed no metastatic disease.
E.A. appeared very anxious while waiting
for the breast cancer specialist. The oncol-
ogy nurse provided E.A. with a novel to read
to alleviate her anxiety via bibliotherapy.
Overview
Patients diagnosed with cancer often expe-
rience anxiety and distress that can affect
their overall quality of life (National Cancer
Institute, 2015). Bibliotherapy is a therapeu-
tic approach primarily used in a variety of
mental health problems, such as anxiety
and distress, in which written materials play
a central role (Glasgow & Rosen, 1978).
Bibliotherapy refers to the use of any
literature that supports good mental
health and is a versatile and cost-effective
intervention often used to supplement
other types of therapy (GoodTherapy,
2016). The National Library of Medicine
(2018) defines bibliotherapy as a form
of psychotherapy in which the patient
is given carefully selected material to
read. Bibliotherapy is often used to treat
common mental health problems, such
as stress, depression, anxiety, and psy-
chological disorders (Gots, 2016). In the
hematology/oncology practice setting,
patients may have feelings of anxiety and
distress while being screened for cancer,
waiting on results of tests, receiving a
cancer diagnosis, being treated for cancer,
or worrying that the cancer will come
back. Despite the history of therapeutic
benefits of bibliotherapy in numerous non–
cancer-related health issues, such as sexual
dysfunction (van Lankveld, 1998), anxi-
ety disorders in children and adolescents
(Amer, 1999; James, Soler, & Weatherall,
2005), and depression in older adults
(Wilson, Mottram, & Vassilas, 2008), the
efficacy of bibliotherapy in alleviating
psychosocial health problems in patients
diagnosed with cancer has not been pre-
viously examined in a systematic manner.
Objectives
The purposes of this review are to appraise
the evidence on the efficacy of bibliothera-
py for alleviating anxiety, depression, and
other psychosocial outcome variables in
patients diagnosed with cancer and to de-
scribe the patient-reported psychosocial
outcomes and their measures in research
studies involving bibliotherapy.
An appraisal of the evidence on the
ecacy of bibliotherapy on anxiety,
distress, and coping in patients with
cancer is lacking in the literature. Bib-
liotherapy is a self-help intervention
using a variety of tools, such as self-
help workbooks, pamphlets, novels,
and audiobooks, to improve mental
health. This review identified nine
original research articles that exam-
ined bibliotherapy as an intervention
to alleviate the psychological issues
associated with a cancer diagnosis.
Data synthesis from these studies
provides preliminary evidence that
bibliotherapy is an acceptable and
beneficial adjunct therapy for patients
with cancer experiencing anxiety,
depression, and ineective coping.
AT A GLANCE
ɔPreliminary evidence shows that
patients with cancer can benefit
from bibliotherapy.
ɔStress reduction, relief of anxiety
and depression, and eective
coping are among the most
frequently patient-reported
outcomes of bibliotherapy.
ɔConsistent use of the same instru-
ments to measure patient-reported
outcomes and randomized, con-
trolled trials are warranted to draw
solid conclusions and establish the
causal link between bibliotherapy
and patient-reported outcomes.
KEYWORDS
bibliotherapy; anxiety;
cancer; coping; quality of life;
breast cancer
DIGITAL OBJECT
IDENTIFIER
10.1188/18.CJON.377-380
378 CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING AUGUST 2018, VOL. 22 NO. 4 CJON.ONS.ORG
SUPPORTIVE CARE
TABLE 1.
STUDIES ON THE EFFICACY OF BIBLIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER
STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLE, AND SETTING TOOLS AND DATA ANALYSIS FINDINGS
Hammer et al.,
2017
Exploratory and descriptive study involving
17 self-referred cancer survivors with various
cancer diagnoses
24-week intervention called Active Book
Club with audiobook listening, walking, and
supervised book club meetings. Thematic
analysis of pre- and postintervention semi-
structured interviews and self-administered
questionnaires were used to assess mental
health and physical activity behaviors, as well
as retention, attendance, and adherence.
The authors concluded that audiobooks may
bring new meaning to physical activity and
serve as a relief from individual concerns.
Some stories aected participants negatively,
and there was a high dropout rate.
Huang et al.,
2015 Qualitative design
This study used 45 books discussing
early-stage breast cancer written for children
aged 3–12 years. Content analysis was used.
These books were found to be beneficial to
children and adults, cost eective, and helpful
to patients in terms of emotional expression.
Krebber et al.,
2017
Qualitative study with 16 patients with head
and neck and lung cancer
2 guided self-help interventions via Internet
or booklet were used. Perceived benefits were
derived from thematic analysis of qualitative
interviews.
Most patients reported that they found
the intervention to be beneficial regarding
learning what matters in life, being able to
put things in perspective, and feeling an
enhanced internal locus of control.
Moccia, 2013 Qualitative design in children with terminal
cancer
The book Milo’s Special Kite was created to
serve as a bibliotherapeutic tool for children
with terminal cancer by allowing them to
relate to the story character. Qualitative
content analysis of existing children’s books
related to death was used, and researchers
measured coping.
Results suggest that this book may optimally
support children dying of cancer and their
family members.
Roberts et al.,
2016
Descriptive, qualitative study with 18 patients
with cancer recruited from psychosocial
support cancer centers of two tertiary care
teaching hospitals in Canada
A self-help workbook, Mastering the Art
of Coping in Good Times and Bad, was
used. Content analysis was performed
using data-coding method. Acceptability
and benefits of bibliotherapy were derived
through content analysis of qualitative data
from interviews.
The workbook was acceptable as an
intervention to manage stress. 17 of 18
participants reported that they would
recommend the workbook to other patients
with cancer. The workbook reinforced
existing coping skills, positive thinking,
mindfulness, and appreciation of the impor-
tance of relationships.
Schneider
et al., 2013
Descriptive, mixed quasiexperimental and
qualitative design in 21 patients with cancer
(most had lymphoblastic leukemia) who
were undergoing or had recently completed
treatment
The book Nikki’s Day at Chemo was devel-
oped for this study, using coping strategies
for a child diagnosed with cancer. The
intervention was provided in a patient’s home
by a caseworker. Paired-samples t tests were
used to determine the change in the Child
Outcome Rating Scale.
Perceptions of intrapersonal functioning
improved, and physiologic arousal decreased
immediately after the initial book reading. The
participants consistently recalled the specifics
of the coping strategies employed in the
book. Parent and child were empowered to
cope with cancer together.
Semple et al.,
2006
Descriptive, qualitative study with 28 newly
diagnosed patients with head and neck
cancer
Psychoeducational intervention program
with one-to-one therapy, group therapy, or
workbook exercises; content analysis was
used to determine preferences for psycho-
educational interventions, self-esteem, and
anxiety.
Patients preferred the more individualized
one-to-one therapy, followed closely by
workbook exercises. Group therapy was least
preferred.
Semple et al.,
2009
Quasiexperimental design in a sample of 54
patients with predetermined psychological
dysfunction; 25 participants self-selected into
the experimental group, with 29 participants
in the control group.
The Psychosocial Intervention Programme
was delivered in participants’ homes with
a minimum of 2 sessions and a maximum
of 6 sessions. Booklets were designed for
each of the 8 problem-related areas (anxiety,
depression, eating and drinking, fatigue,
appearance, speech, smoking cessation,
and finance). Questionnaires and analysis of
covariance were used to measure anxiety,
depression, coping, and quality of life with a
3-month follow-up.
Participants reported reduction in psycho-
logical distress (anxiety and depression) and
improved social functioning and quality of
life for the experimental group, which was
sustained into the 3-month follow-up period.
All participants reported that they found the
bibliotherapeutic texts to be helpful.
Note. Level of evidence for all studies was VI, except Semple et al. (2009) and Schneider et al. (2013), which were level III.
AUGUST 2018, VOL. 22 NO. 4 CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING 379CJON.ONS.ORG
"Bibliotherapy refers to the use of
any literature that supports good
mental health and is a versatile
and cost-eective intervention."
Methods
This review was conducted using
Whittemore and Knafl’s (2005) inte-
grative literature review framework,
which consists of specifying the review
purpose, performing a literature search
using computerized databases, evaluat-
ing data using primary sources, analyzing
and synthesizing data, presenting the re-
sults, and arriving at a conclusion that has
evidence-based practice applications
(Whittemore & Knafl, 2005).
Integrative Literature Search
PubMed, PsycINFO®, ProQuest, and
Academic Search Complete computerized
databases were search for relevant litera-
ture. The search terms included keywords
and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH)
terms, such as bibliotherapy, anxiety, depres-
sion, coping, quality of life, and cancer. The
Boolean operators NOT and AND were
used to yield highly relevant articles. In
addition, the search was limited to peer-
reviewed articles published from 1985–2017.
Original research articles that specified
bibliotherapy as an intervention in patients
diagnosed with cancer and articles that
conveyed evidence from the opinions of
authorities or reports of expert committees
on the therapeutic effects of bibliotherapy
on patients with cancer are also included
in the final data analysis. Nine articles were
included in the final analysis.
Data Analysis
The nine original research studies includ-
ed in the data analysis are categorized
and summarized according to bibliother-
apeutic approaches, patient-reported
outcomes, effectiveness of bibliotherapy
and level of evidence using Melnyk and
Fineout-Overholt’s (2011) hierarchy of
evidence. The patient-reported outcomes
and the tools used to measure them are
presented according to the highest and
lowest frequency of reporting to identify
key outcomes associated with bibliothera-
py in patients with cancer.
Results
Of these nine studies, six used qualitative
study design. All nine studies conclud-
ed that bibliotherapy is beneficial to
patients with cancer (see Table 1). In ad-
dition, bibliotherapy is primarily studied
in terms of its association with reduced
levels of anxiety and depression and im-
proved coping skills (see Table 2). The
most commonly used tools to measure
anxiety and depression are the Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
and the Child Outcome Rating Scale
(CORS). The CORS instrument is intend-
ed to measure anxiety, depression, and
general functioning (coping) for children
aged 6–12 years.
Discussion
Overall, the studies included in this review
reported positive results. Of note, research-
ers have measured various patient-reported
outcomes using different measures. Most
of the outcomes measured are within the
psychological domain; however, there was
heterogeneity in the outcomes measured
and measures used. Future studies on
bibliotherapy in patients diagnosed with
cancer should consistently measure key
outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and
coping, and should use the same measures
to determine the effect size of bibliothera-
py on these key outcomes.
Limitations
The studies that met the inclusion and ex-
clusion criteria in this review have small
sample sizes that limit the generalizability
of the findings. The inclusion and exclusion
criteria are arbitrarily determined, and they
may have introduced unintended selection
bias effect. The use of various measures
for a specific outcome presents serious
limitation in determining the strength of
association between bibliotherapy and its
therapeutic benefits. The consistent use of
standardized measures for anxiety, depres-
sion, and coping is recommended in future
studies to facilitate meaningful compari-
sons and draw solid conclusions.
TABLE 2.
NUMBER OF STUDIES
USING PATIENT-REPORTED
OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH
BIBLIOTHERAPY AND MEASURES
USED (N = 9)
PATIENTREPORTED
OUTCOME n MEASURE
Coping skills 4 CORS
Anxiety 2 HADS, CORS
Depression 2 HADS, CORS
Self-esteem 1 CORS
Social function 1 WSAS
QOL 1 UW-QOL
Interpersonal, family,
school, and global QOL 1 CORS
Self-ecacy 1 Interview
guide
Perception of
helpfulness 1Interview
guide
Perception of support 1 Interview
guide
CORS—Child Outcome Rating Scale; HADS—Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale; QOL—quality of life;
UW-QOL—University of Washington QOL questionnaire;
WSAS—Work and Social Adjustment Scale
380 CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING AUGUST 2018, VOL. 22 NO. 4 CJON.ONS.ORG
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Conclusion
Bibliotherapy appears to be acceptable and
beneficial in alleviating patient-reported
anxiety and depression and improving
coping skills in patients diagnosed with
cancer. Randomized, controlled trials
are lacking to establish the causal re-
lationship between bibliotherapy and
patient-reported outcomes.
Ryan Malibiran, MSN, RN, is a recent graduate,
Joseph D. Tariman, PhD, RN, ANP-BC, FAAN, is
an assistant professor, and Kim Amer, PhD, RN, is
an associate professor, all in the School of Nursing
at DePaul University in Chicago, IL. Malibiran can
be reached at malibir2@gmail.com, with copy to
CJONEditor@ons.org.
The authors take full responsibility for this content and did
not receive honoraria or disclose any relevant financial
relationships.
REFERENCES
Amer, K. (1999). Bibliotherapy: Using fiction to help children
in two populations discuss feelings. Pediatric Nursing,
25, 91–95.
Glasgow, R.E., & Rosen, G.M. (1978). Behavioral bibliotherapy:
A review of self-help behavior therapy manuals. Psycho-
logical Bulletin, 85, 1–23.
GoodTherapy. (2016). Bibliotherapy. Retrieved from https://
www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/types/
bibliotherapy
Gots, J. (2016). Anxious? Depressed? Literate? Try bibliothera-
py. Big Think. Retrieved from http://bigthink.com/think
-tank/anxious-depressed-literate-try-bibliotherapy
Hammer, N.M., Egestad, L.K., Nielsen, S.G., Bjerre, E., Johan-
sen, C., Egerod, I., . . . Midtgaard, J. (2017). Feasibility and
acceptability of active book clubs in cancer survivors—An
explorative investigation. Acta Oncologica, 56,
471–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016
.1277036
Huang, X., Lee, S., Hu, Y., Gao, H., & O’Connor, M. (2015).
Talking about maternal breast cancer with young children:
A content analysis of text in children’s books. Journal of
Pediatric Psychology, 40, 609–621. https://doi.org/
10.1093/jpepsy/jsu110
James, A., Soler, A., & Weatherall, R. (2005). Cognitive
behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and
adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
4, CD004690. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
.CD004690.pub2
Krebber, A.H., van Uden-Kraan, C.F., Melissant, H.C., Cuijpers,
P., van Straten, A., Becker-Commissaris, A., . . . Verdonck-
de Leeuw, I.M. (2017).A guided self-help intervention
targeting psychological distress among head and neck
cancer and lung cancer patients: Motivation to start,
experiences and perceived outcomes.Supportive Care in
Cancer, 25,127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520
-016-3393-x
Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based
practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best
practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams
and Wilkins.
Moccia, C.F. (2013). Milo’s special kite: Bibliotherapy for
children with terminal cancer (Doctoral dissertation). West
Hartford, CT: University of Hartford.
National Cancer Institute. (2015). Adjustment to cancer: Anx-
iety and distress (PDQ®)—Patient version. Retrieved from
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/coping/feelings/
anxiety-distress-pdq
National Library of Medicine. (2018). Bibliotherapy. Retrieved
from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=
bibliotherapy
Roberts, N., Lee, V., Ananng, B., & Körner, A. (2016). Accept-
ability of bibliotherapy for patients with cancer:
A qualitative, descriptive study. Oncology Nursing
Forum, 43, 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF
.588-594
Schneider, N.M., Peterson, M., Gathercoal, K.A., & Hamilton, E.
(2013). The eect of bibliotherapy on anxiety in children
with cancer. International Journal of Child Health and
Human Development, 6, 337–345.
Semple, C.J., Dunwoody, L., Kernohan, W.G., & McCaughan,
E. (2009). Development and evaluation of a problem-fo-
cused psychosocial intervention for patients with head
and neck cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 379–388.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0480-7
Semple, C.J., Dunwoody, L., Sullivan, K., & Kernohan,
W.G.(2006).Patients with head and neck cancer prefer
individualized cognitive behavioural therapy.European
Journal of Cancer Care, 15,220–227. https://doi
.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00643.x
van Lankveld, J.J. (1998). Bibliotherapy in the treatment of
sexual dysfunctions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consult-
ing and Clinical Psychology, 66, 702–708.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review:
Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
52, 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648
.2005.03621.x
Wilson, K.C., Mottram, P.G., & Vassilas, C.A. (2008). Psy-
chotherapeutic treatments for older depressed people.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD004853.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004853.pub2
DO YOU HAVE AN INTERESTING
TOPIC TO SHARE?
Supportive Care provides readers with
information on symptom management and
palliative care issues. If you are interested in
writing for this department, contact Associate
Editor Joseph D. Tariman, PhD, RN, ANP-BC,
FAAN, at phdinseattle@gmail.com.