ArticlePDF Available

Arab Spring as a Background of Civil War in Syria

Authors:
  • Military University of Land Forces, Wroclaw

Abstract and Figures

In the paper the reasons of outbreak of conflict in Syria at the background of social and political situation of the Arab world at the beginning of 21st century were presented. The influence of displeasure explosion against governments in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, known as Arab Spring, on the situation in Syria was described. The attention on escalation of tensions between Bashar al-Assad’s government and opposition as a source of civil war in Syria was paid. The foreign players at the arena of Syrian conflict with special concern to United States and Russia activity, as a main contractors in the conflict were shown
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION
Vol. XXIV No 1 2018
ARAB SPRING AS A BACKGROUND OF CIVIL WAR IN SYRIA
Marian ŻUBER, Samuel Sahel MOUSSA
Military University of Land Forces, Wroclaw, Poland
marian.zuber@awl.edu.pl, samuel.moussa@awl.edu.pl
Abstract: In the paper the reasons of outbreak of conflict in Syria at the background of social and
political situation of the Arab world at the beginning of 21st century were presented. The influence of
displeasure explosion against governments in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, known as Arab Spring, on the
situation in Syria was described. The attention on escalation of tensions between Bashar al-Assad’s
government and opposition as a source of civil war in Syria was paid. The foreign players at the arena
of Syrian conflict with special concern to United States and Russia activity, as a main contractors in
the conflict were shown.
Keywords: Arab Spring, Arab awakening, Middle East, civil war, democratisation
1. Introduction
The end of 2010, and the beginning of 2011
known as the Arab Spring or Arab
awakening concerns the wave of
revolutions in the North Africa and in the
Middle East region arranged with the
purpose of overthrowing the most powerful,
long-lasting, and reactive violent regimes in
such countries as Tunisia, Egypt, Syria,
Libya, and Yemen [1]. The first exact apply
of the term “Arab Spring” was initiated by
US political academic journal “Foreign
Policy” [2].
The events of the Arab Spring in Tunisia
had huge influence on the situation in other
countries of North Africa and in the Middle
East. Aftermath of uprisings in each nation
proceeded in various ways and effects of
them were different.
The protests in the countries where civil
resistance occurred had different effects but
methods of protests were similar. Citizens
expressed their dissatisfaction through
strikes, rallies, demonstrations and marches
as much as the effective use of social media
(Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other) to
organise, communicate and create
awareness in the face of the occurring
events [3]. The reaction of governments on
the protests had three forms: resign of
country leaders after pressures of society or
army, social, political and economic
reforms and using the violence in the mass
range (civil war). The ruling elites took
various actions in the face of protests: from
concessions and reforms in the country to
repression and using violence against
citizens.
In the paper, the authors analyse the
implications for the social and political
situation in Syria as a result of the events of
the Arab Spring in Tunisia, Libya and
Egypt. They focused on the development of
the conflict in Syria under Bashar al-Assad
to show the development of the conflict
from revolt to civil war.
2. The impact of the Arab Spring on the
situation in North Africa and Middle
East region
At the beginning of 2011 the revolt spread
to other Arab countries. The strength of
social movements of the Arab Spring was
so enormous that it could lead to major
DOI: 10.1515/kbo-2018-0038
© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
245
changes in the Arab world, and even the
overthrow of leaders who had been in
power for decades [4]:
Tunisia - Zine el-Abidine Ben Alì, who
ruled from 1987, was forced to resign
and leave the country.
Algeria and Morocco - social protests
have had less impact than protests in
other Arab countries, but they have led
to democratic changes.
Egypt - Hosni Mubarak, who ruled
from 1981, similarly to the leader of
Tunisia, was forced to resign and leave
the country.
Libya - the result of revolt was civil
war, in which NATO forces were
engaged. The leader of Libya Muammar
Gaddafi - in power from 1969, was
captured and killed on 20 October 2011
during the Battle of Sirte, by National
Transitional Council (NTC) militants.
Syria - the result of the outbreak of
revolt in March 2011 was the
repression against citizens from the
regime of President Bashar al-Assad,
who ruled from 2000, without
proposing political and social changes
in Syria.
Yemen - president Ali Abdullah Saleh,
who ruled for 33 years, after ten
months of revolt, on November 2,
2011, signed an agreement according to
which he handed over power to vice-
president Abdrabuh Mansur Hadi,
obtaining immunity for himself and his
family.
The riots spread during 2011 to many
countries of the Middle East such as
Bahrain, Jordan, Oman and Iran, as
well as their consequences had
different dimensions.
Figure1 presents events of Arab Spring at
the timeline [5].
2.1. Tunisia the beginning of Arab
awakening
The genesis of Arab Spring began in Tunisia,
on 17 December 2010, when Mohamed
Bouazizi, a 26-year-old vendor from Sidi
Bouzid, set himself the fire to protest
against the confiscation of his cart, which
allowed him to keep his family. The
incident became the spark which caused
changes in Arab countries alight in the near
future.
Protests began locally in this same day, in
several places, but then spread across the
country. Their scale was so massive and
surprising that it forced President Zine El
Abidin Ben Ali, in office from 1987 to
issue a warning on 28 December that
dissent would be severely punished [6]. The
protests were the first sign of successful
popular movement and official
denunciation, a pattern that would soon
become a familiar throughout the Arab
world.
The response of the government was not
positive and the police killed and arrested
many youths. This news disseminated
throughout Tunisia. Many unemployed
young people and the majority of Tunisians
citizens demonstrated in every place of the
country by opposing the government. The
government of Tunisia brutally killed and
arrested many Tunisians. This events
changed the history of Tunisia and became
turning points for the whole Arab states and
signal to the revolution. Finally the
government made many promise to the
people to make a reform but the people of
Tunisia did not return back to their home. At
the conclusion the government of Tunisia
fled from the country to Saudi Arabia [7].
After the escape of Ben Ali, his ministers
were forced to resign because the society
did not want the old discredited political
elites caring only for their own interests. An
interim government was established which
focused on preparing democratic elections.
After the elections situation in Tunisia had
stabilized.
246
Figure 1. The events of Arab spring [4]
2.2. Libya – the death of dictator
First protests in Libya started on 13 January
2011 but mass uprisings began in the city of
Benghazi on 15 February 2011. Public
discontents in the all country were as an
result of rebellion in the north-east of the
country and in the Nafusa Mountains in the
north-west, as well as smaller local protest
in Benghazi over the detention of a lawyer
Fathi Terbil. Within some days the unrest
also spread to the Tripoli and other cities in
the north-west. The actors of the uprising’s
first days were unorganised young men
acting spontaneously [8]. From Benghazi,
the revolt spread quickly and Gaddafi
ordered troops loyal to him to quell the
rebellion. The rebels set up the National
Transitional Council (on 27 February),
claiming to be the legitimate government of
Libya.
When the Libyan government escalated its
response with the use of force to regional
riots in Benghazi and other Libyan cities,
which caused the deaths of dozens of
rioters, popular rebellion spread throughout
northern Libya. The conflict developed into
civil war. The Libyan conflict has evolved
from a peaceful protest to a bloody civil
war. The main reasons for this scenario
were: the repressive regime of Gaddafi, the
division of Libya's territory between the
NTC and the supporters of the regime, the
supply of weapon to NTC and coalition
rebel forces, the influence of the Arab
League and NATO intervention.
On 20 October 2011, war officially ended
with Gaddafi’s death and the NTC’s
declaration of victory [9].
In the Libyan uprising four distinct stages
could be distinguished: peaceful protests,
247
rebellion, organized belligerency, and
international intervention.
Due to the war in Libya, thousands of
people lost their lives and hundreds of
thousands were forced to migrate to
neighboring countries. Losses in the
economy have reached billions of dollars
[10]. After the war, the process of creating
the new government and developing the
new constitution began.
2.3. Egypt protests in the shadow of
pyramids
Revolution in Egypt, which started on 25
January 2011, was triggered soon after the
uprising in Tunisia. The protests, which
took place on Cairo's Tahrir Square, was
the result of the tradition of protests in
Egypt, which lasted over a decade, and
which included pro-democratic activity,
workers' movements and Internet
campaigns against the brutality of the
Mubarak regime [11].
The revolution started by calls from online
youth groups for protests against regime.
Violent clashes between security forces and
protesters resulted in at least 846 people
killed and over 6000 injured. Protesters
retaliated by burning over 90 police stations
across the country. The protests took place
in Cairo, which was described as “a war
zone” during the uprising [12], Alexandria,
and in all major cities across the nation. On
Friday, January 28, about 50,000 protesters
appeared on Tahrir Square, who joined the
demonstration. Protests also increased after
January 28. More than 500,000 protesters
filled the square on 1, 8 and 11 February.
In the evening of February 11, Vice
President Omar Suleiman publicly
announced the demise of the Mubarak
government and the transfer of power to the
army [13]. In the following weeks, the
country was destabilized. Plundering and
acts of violence began, and the police
almost disappeared from the streets. With
time, the order was restored.
2.4. Syria the longest and the
bloodiest conflict of Arab Spring
The explosion of protests and social unrest
in Tunisia, and then in such countries like
Libya and Egypt had also essential
influence on other countries of North Africa
and the Middle East, by political, economic
and social factors, and brought a serious
challenges on, for the security of the
Middle East. One of these countries was
Syria.
The conflict in Syria began with protests on
January 26, 2011 and turned into a general
uprising on March 15, 2011. It has become
the bloodiest conflict in the Middle East as
the consequence of the Arab Spring [14].
The scenario at the beginning of the conflict
was similar to other countries. The serious
pro-democracy protests against Syrian
regime erupted in Deraa, the city of
southern Syria, after the arrest and torture
of some teenagers who painted
revolutionary slogans on a wall on 6 March
2011. The escalation of the conflict
followed after the security forces opened
fire on demonstrators, killing several of
them. Protesters demanded President
Assad's resignation. The use of force by the
government to disperse the demonstrations
only sharpened the determination of the
protesters.
Violence was escalating and the civil war
broke out. The rebel brigades were formed
to fight government forces and take control
of large cities, towns and villages. In 2012,
the battles took over the capital - Damascus
and the second largest city of Syria -
Aleppo [15].
The armed conflict showed real divisions in
the Syrian society. Most Syrians are Sunni
Muslims, but Syria's security establishment
has been dominated by members of the
Alawi sect, of which Assad is a member.
Sectarianism is special feature which
occurred during the civil war. Regional
governments of Iran and Iraq with the Shia
majority and Lebanese Hezbollah supported
Assad, while countries with the Sunni
majority, including Turkey, Qatar and
Saudi Arabia, supported the rebels against
Assad [16].
Foreign intervention played a large role in
Syria's civil war but paradoxically it
escalated conflict and prolonged the
248
ongoing civil war. Some states supported
Syria in the war against the Islamic State of
Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as
ISIS) but encouragement for Assad’s
regime was not clear.
Russia joined the conflict in 2015 and
became the main ally of the Assad regime
in the fight against the opposition and the
Islamic State. The US has supported the
opposition to the Assad government backed
by Russia and has participated in offensive
against ISIL [17].
3. Conclusions
The Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of
demonstrations and protests that have
embraced almost the entire Arab world. A
main slogan of the demonstrators in this
uprising has been a sentence Ash-sha’b yurid
isqat an-nizam (The people want to bring
down the regime) [18].
The reasons of the protests had different
bases in individual countries, but most often
resulted from internal problems such as:
economic problems, rising unemployment,
extreme poverty, restriction of democracy,
human rights violations, widespread
corruption, rising food prices and various
demographic factors such as high
percentage of young educated people who
were left without work, as well as the
existence of centralized systems leading to
the marginalization of people outside large
cities.
In some countries the protests were aimed
at overthrowing the regime, while in others
improving the living conditions of society,
while maintaining an independent state.
Figure 2. Changes in the Middle East after Arab Spring [20]
The ruling elite responded to the protesters
differently: from introducing top-down
reforms and making efforts to ‘buy’ social
peace to repression and armed violence
[19]. Figure 2. presents countries in the
Middle East where changes have succeeded
after Arab Spring.
The Arab Spring emerged Islamists as
newly serious actors in MENA region
politics. While Islamists in the past have
always been an influential voice in Arab
politics, the Arab Spring allowed them to
move from the sidelines to the main stage.
For example, the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt and al-Nahda in Tunisia, were both
elected to power in post-revolutionary
governments.
Acknowledgements
This article has been developed as part of
scientific and research project No.
100/WNoB/39/DzS, partially financed from
the funds of the Ministry of Science and
Higher Education of the Republic of
Poland.
249
References
[1] Lynch M., The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East,
Public Affairs, New York 2012, p. 304.
[2] Abusharif I. N., Parsing “Arab Spring”. Media Coverage of the Arab revolution.
Ocasional Paper Series. Qatar: Northwestern University . p. I.
[3] Abdelsalam E., The Arab Spring: Its origin, evolution and consequences ... four years on.
Intellectual Discourse, 23:1 (2015) 122.
[4] Ansani A., Daniele V., About a revolution. The economic motivations of the Arab
Spring, International Journal of Development and Conflict, Vol. 3(3), 2012, p.2.
[5] A Climate of Change. Special report. The Arab spring. The Economist July 13th 2013,
p.3.
[6] Dabashi H., The Arab Spring. The end of Postcolonialism. Zed Books, London New
York 2012, p. 26.
[7] Diani M., Caelum Moffat, Modes of Coordination of Contentious Collective Action in
the Middle East in: Popular Contention, Regime and Transition: Arab Revolts in
Comparative Perspective. Alimi E.Y., Sela A., Sznajder M. (ed.) New York, Oxford
University Press, 2016, p. 43.
[8] Asseburg M. (ed.), Protest, Revolt and Regime Change in the Arab World. Actors,
Challenges, Implications and Policy Options. SWP Research Paper, Stiftung
Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin 2012, p. 11.
[9] Zenko M. By overreaching in Libya, NATO has left Syria to fend alone. Council on
Foreign Relations. 11 October 2011. http://www.cfr.org/nato/overreaching-libya-nato-
has-left-syria-fend-alone/p26153 (19.03.2018).
[10] Aghayev E., Analysis and background of the “Arab Spring” in Libya, European
Researcher, 2013, Vol.(39), No 1-2, pp. 193-198.
[11] Stein E., After the Arab Spring: power shift in the Middle East?: revolutionary Egypt:
promises and perils. IDEAS reports - special reports, Kitchen N. (ed.) SR011. LSE
IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2012. p.23.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43461/ (18.03.2018).
[12] Siddique H., Owen P., Gabbatt A. Protests in Egypt and unrest in Middle East as it
happened. The Guardian. UK. (25 January 2011). Archived from the original on 26
January 2011. Retrieved 26 January 2011.
[13] Acemoglu D., Hassan T. A., Tahoun A. The Power of the Street: Evidence of the
Egypt’s Arab Spring, NBER Working Paper No. 20665, November 2014. p. 18.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w20665 (18 .03.2018).
[14] Ivanciu C., The Status of Armed Conflict. Case study: the Conflict in Syria. Scientific
Research and Education in the Air Force – AFASES, Volume II, Brasov 2016, p. 588.
[15] The Syrian Cicvil War: Between Escalation and Intervention, CSS Analysis in security
policy, ETH Zurich, No 124, November 2012, p. 2.
[16] Hof F., Sectarian Violence in Syria’s Civil War: Causes, Consequences and
Recommendations for Mitigation, https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20130325-syria-
report.pdf (19.03.2018).
[17] Rogers P., Reeve R., Russia’s Intervention in Syria: Implications for Western
Engagement, Global Security Briefing – October 2015, Oxford research Group, pp. 1-5.
[18] Salih K., The Roots and Causes of the 2011 Arab Uprisings, Arab Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 35, No. 2 (Spring 2013), p. 185, based on: Hardy R., Egypt protests: An Arab
spring as old order crumbles, BBC News, February 2, 2011.
250
[19] Rosiny S., The Arab Spring: Triggers, Dynamics and Prospects, GIGA Focus
International Edition No. 1, 2012. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/
files/publications/gf_international_1201.pdf (18.03.2018).
[20] Rózsa E. N. and Co-authors, The Arab Spring. Its Impact on the Region and on the
Middle East Conference, Policy Brief for the Middle East Conference on a WMD/DVs
Free Zone, No. 9-10, August 2012. Academic Peace Orchestra Middle East.
251
... By a unanimous vote of the General Assemble of the United Nations, Gaddafi's led administration of Libya was suspended on grounds of human rights violations, citing the abuse of rights to association and peaceful protests of which violence are used against protesters. It should be recalled that the 2010/2011 Arab Spring or Arab Awakening erupted as reprisal to oppressive anti-democratic government in North Africa and in the Middle East region, with the aim of changing such administrations through revolution in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Tunisia, Egypt (Zuber and Moussa, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Human rights and sustainable development are two concepts that are interdependent and much related. For this reason, the former Millennium Development Goals and present Agenda – 2030 are geared towards development through human rights based approach. This study therefore, is aimed at examining the present state of human rights in Nigeria and her level of development from 1999 to 2018. This study is basically qualitative, while linkage theory is adopted as its theoretical framework. The study posits that the persistent human rights violations in Nigeria is a major hindrance to sustainable development, and that Gross Domestic Product should not be the main indicator of development, since high GDP has not always reflected human development. The study concludes that human rights violations in Nigeria have impeded development in Nigeria.
... The protests were characterized by the expression of dissent and displeasures against the regime. The protesters cited situations of human rights abuses, unemployment, unequal distribution of wealth, and corruption, among other issues (Żuber & Moussa, 2018). Protests were however greeted with force by pro-government forces, who opened fire on unarmed protesters. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article interrogates the legality of American interventions in the Syrian conflict. The Syrian civil war stands as one of the most controversial conflicts of the 21st century, owing to the mass destruction of lives and properties and the multiplicity of interventions which have created numerous strands of the conflict. The United States as one of the intervening powers has shown support for the rebel forces geared at toppling the Assad government. The research adopts the qualitative method and utilizes the case study research design. The research makes use of secondary data as derived from academic journals, books, book chapters, newspapers, and so on and analyzes these data through the use of thematic analysis. The findings of the study reveal that the interventions of the United States are not legal. The study also finds that the United States possesses certain strategic interests in the Syrian conflict which it aims to achieve.
Article
Full-text available
The Syrian civil war has led to more than 6.8 million people fleeing Syria. Jordan has received the biggest number of Syrian refugees per capita, after Lebanon. In this article, authors take a retrospective look at how the Jordanian government adopted a new approach for hosting the Syrian population within the context of social and economic challenges. The authors draw on an exhaustive inventory of historical events, government decisions, and other grey literature, combined with key informant interviews. This article emphasizes the importance of considering a country’s legacy and the current socio-economic landscape when examining the migration-development nexus. The article contends that the evolution of refugees management from “camps” to “integration” through a development approach did not follow a linear sequence; rather, it appears to have been strategically employed as a governance tool to attain political, economic, and humanitarian stability.
Thesis
Full-text available
Resumo / Abstract A presente dissertação discute o conceito de solidariedade proposto no Novo Pacto em Matéria de Migração e Asilo, propondo-se aferir se responde de forma adequada às necessidades e aos objetivos da União Europeia nesta matéria. A importância deste documento político e pacote legislativo associado decorre da incapacidade de adotar uma solidariedade permanente que permita gerir a migração e o asilo. Seguindo uma abordagem fundamentalmente qualitativa, com carácter descritivo e dedutivo, são analisados o contexto da crise migratória de 2015/16 e as suas consequências para a União; as perspetivas de solidariedade presentes na Agenda Europeia da Migração, de 2015, e no Novo Pacto, de 2020; as disparidades na resposta à gestão da migração prevista na Agenda Europeia da Migração; e as diferentes abordagens ao processo negocial no Novo Pacto em Matéria de Migração e Asilo. A investigação conclui que o Novo Pacto é incapaz de unir todos os Estados-membros na implementação de um equilíbrio entre solidariedade e partilha equitativa das responsabilidades. Este insucesso demonstra como os limites da solidariedade se encontram bem definidos, não permitindo que os interesses da União vão para além dos dos Estados-membros. É o travão imposto por estes últimos, marcadamente intergovernamental, que impossibilita uma verdadeira revisão do SECA e do Regulamento de Dublin. Esta revisão é essencial para alterar o critério de determinação do Estado-membro responsável pela análise dos pedidos de asilo, motivador das desigualdades entre os diferentes sistemas nacionais de asilo. A existência de mecanismos de solidariedade demasiado complexos e de difícil aplicação também impedem a implementação desse equilíbrio. Assim, apesar de constituir um avanço notável, nomeadamente numa perspetiva neofuncionalista de integração europeia, dado o carácter transnacional do fenómeno migratório obrigar a uma solução concertada entre Estados-membros, o Novo Pacto não responde na totalidade às necessidades e objetivos da União Europeia. Palavras-chave: Crise migratória; União Europeia; Agenda Europeia da Migração; Novo Pacto; Solidariedade. Abstract This dissertation duels on the concept of solidarity proposed in the New Pact on Migration and Asylum to assess whether it responds adequately to the needs and objectives of the European Union. The importance of this policy document and associated legislative package stems from the EU’s inability to adopt permanent solidarity to manage migration and asylum successfully. Following a fundamentally qualitative approach, in a descriptive and deductive nature, the dissertation analyzes the context of the migration crisis of 2015/16 and its consequences for the Union; the perspectives of solidarity present in the European Agenda on Migration of 2015 and in the 2020 New Pact; the disparities in migration management foreseen in the European Agenda on Migration; and the different approaches to the negotiation process in the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. The research concludes that the New Pact is unable to unite all Member States in striking a balance between solidarity and a fair sharing of responsibility. This failure demonstrates that the limits of solidarity are well defined, not allowing the Union’s interests to go beyond those of the Member States. It is this markedly intergovernmental stance that makes a true CEAS and Dublin Regulation’s review impossible. This reevaluation is essential to change the criteria determining the Member State responsible for asylum applications, which is the main driver of the inequalities experienced between the national asylum systems of the first entry countries and those of the remaining countries. The existence of solidarity mechanisms that are too complex and difficult to implement also hinders the balance between solidarity and a fair sharing of responsibilities. Despite being a step forward, particularly in a neofunctionalist perspective of European integration, given the transnational nature of the migration phenomenon, the New Pact does not fully meet the needs and objectives of the European Union. Keywords: Migration Crisis; European Union; European Agenda on Migration; New Pact; Solidarity.
Article
The conflict and violence in the Syrian Arab Republic have led to an increase in Syrians seeking asylum in European countries. In this study, asylum applications of Syrian refugees to European countries are examined, taking into account the geographical neighborhood effects, with annual data for the time period from 2009 to 2018. This paper also aims to compare asylum applications of Syrian to non-Syrian refugees. The estimation results suggest that positive previous asylum application decisions by the corresponding countries have explanatory power on asylum applications of Syrian and non-Syrian refugees. Economic conditions impact on asylum applications of non-Syrian refugees, while similar statistical evidence cannot be found for Syrian refugees. The empirical evidence from Syrian refugees also indicates a positive geographical neighborhood effect, which suggests that the relationship is stronger in countries that are closer to each other. However, the findings from non-Syrian refugees do not indicate that neighboring observations affect one another. Overall, this suggests that Syrian refugees do not move according to economic incentives but with previous asylum applications that resulted in positive and asylum applications in neighboring countries.
Preprint
Full-text available
The objective is to describe infant feeding practices and the nutritional status of infants under six months among Syrian refugees in Greater Beirut, Lebanon. A cross-sectional study was conducted among Syrian refugee mothers with children under five years (July-October 2018), mothers with infants under six months were included in the analysis (n=114). Additionally, eleven focus groups discussions were conducted to explore supportive factors and barriers associated with early breastfeeding practices. The prevalence of pre-lacteal feeding was high (62.5%), whereas early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) was low (31%), and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) very low (24.6%). About one-fifth of the infants were suffering from anemia (20.5%) and 9.6% were wasted. Supporting factors of adequate infant feeding practices comprised knowledge on maternal nutrition and EBF, in addition to receiving support from healthcare professionals and family members. Identified barriers included preterm delivery, pre-lacteal feeding, an at-risk waist circumference and moderate to severe depression among mothers, bottle feeding, early introduction of food, maternal health reasons, breastmilk substitutes’ distribution, and misinformation offered by mothers-in-law. To address sub-optimal feeding practices documented among Syrian refugees in our study, existing infant and young child feeding policies and programs need to be strengthened and revised to tackle the identified gaps.
Article
Full-text available
The objective was to describe infant feeding practices, nutrition and related health aspects of infants under six months among Syrian refugees in Greater Beirut, Lebanon. A cross-sectional study was conducted among Syrian refugee mothers with infants under six months in July–October 2018 (N = 114). Additionally, eleven focus group discussions were conducted to explore supportive factors and barriers associated with early breastfeeding practices. The prevalence of pre-lacteal feeding was high (62.5%), whereas early initiation of breastfeeding was low (31%), and exclusive breastfeeding very low (24.6%). One-fifth of the infants were anemic (20.5%) and 9.6% were wasted. A significantly higher proportion of non-exclusively breastfed infants had a fever and took medicines than those who were exclusively breastfed. Supporting factors of adequate infant feeding practices comprised knowledge on maternal nutrition and exclusive breastfeeding, along with receiving support from healthcare professionals and family members. Identified barriers included preterm delivery, pre-lacteal feeding, an at-risk waist circumference and moderate to severe depression among mothers, bottle feeding, early introduction of food, maternal health reasons, breastmilk substitutes’ distribution, and misinformation offered by mothers-in-law. To address sub-optimal feeding practices documented among Syrian refugees, awareness on proper breastfeeding practices, maternal nutrition, and psychosocial support should be provided to mothers and family members alike.
Article
In recent times, several hostilities have taken place all over the world. However, these hostilities have been non-international in character and outlook, with the attendant gory effects more pronounced in the 20th and 21st Century warfare. The type of weaponry engaged in such hostilities have been in the spotlight in International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The deployment of chemical weapons in the Syrian war and its adverse effect on the civilian population have become a global concern. The effectiveness of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development and Production, Stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, and other legal instruments relating to the protection of victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, have been questioned. Although, scholars had in times past advocated for the restriction and prohibition of the use of chemical weapons in armed conflicts, the Syrian situation has again exposed the need to devote urgent attention to providing more effective sanctions for perpetrators of this heinous crime. This paper seeks to explore the legal implications of the deployment of Chemical Weapons in Syria, by canvassing arguments for more concerted efforts to guard against the use of Chemical Weapons in armed conflicts and ensure more adequate protection for civilians. This will give effect to and promote the core values of IHL.
Article
Full-text available
Syrian refugees in Lebanon are facing vulnerabilities that are affecting their food insecurity levels. The objectives of this study were to measure dietary diversity, food insecurity (FI), and mental health status of Syrian refugee mothers in Lebanon and to explore its associations with their anemia and nutritional status. A cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with children under 5 years (n=433) in Greater Beirut, Lebanon. Dietary diversity was measured using the Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women of Reproductive Age (MDD-W) and FI using the global Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) at the individual level. Depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were measured to assess the maternal mental health status. Data on socio-economic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and hemoglobin concentrations were collected. Overall, 63.3% of the mothers had a low dietary diversity (LDD) and 34.4% were moderately to severely food insecure, with 12.5% being severely food insecure. The prevalence of PTSD, moderate depression, and severe depression were 13.2%, 11.1%, and 9.9%, respectively. A significant correlation was found between LDD and FI (P<0.001). A low-income was significantly associated with LDD and FI. Poor mental health was significantly associated with FI. LDD and FI were not associated with anemia and nutritional status of mothers. Low-income households had significantly higher intakes of grains and refined starchy staples, whereas high-income households consumed more nutritious foods and sweets. Evidence of inadequate diet quality, FI, and poor mental health among Syrian refugee mothers in Lebanon are presented. Multifaceted actions are needed to reduce FI and improve dietary diversity.
Article
Full-text available
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have long been laden with tensions and instabilities. However, the recent Arab Uprisings, better known as the Arab Spring, have intensified volatility, turning this " hot-spot " into a veritable tinderbox whose potential for explosion has far-reaching national, regional and global implications. This review analyses and describes the events leading to the Arab Spring. It also examines the impacts and ramifications of the upheavals on the national, regional and international levels. The review argues that the Arab Spring has both changed and charged some of the region's thorniest problems-from the rise of political Islam to civil wars to rivalries between key regional powers. It raises important questions concerning the impact of the Arab Spring: were these uprisings a deceptive and transient phase of popular anger, or were they a genuine harbinger leading to genuine democratic transition? The review focuses also on the online networking and digital technologies as effective methods of aggregate activism to bypass state owned media. Finally, the review offers an assessment of whether MENA is destined for a political impasse or that political wisdom and prudence will prevail and save the region from the brink of destruction.
Article
Full-text available
The paper reviews the economic motivations of the Arab Spring. After examining the possible relationships between the Arab riots and the global economic crisis started in 2007, the analysis focuses on some structural aspects characterizing North Africa and Middle East Countries, such as their demographic structure, the profound social inequalities, and the discrepancy between the education levels, of youth in particular, and the civil and political rights accorded to the populations. The combination of youth demographics, high unemployment rates, and high educational levels, coupled with an unrepresentative political system, increases the likelihood of social unrest.
Article
Full-text available
The ―Arab Spring‖ which first broke out in Tunisia and disseminated to many countries in the Arab world has become one of the most actual topics of the international political agenda in the recent years. The protests that began against the Gaddafi regime after the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt led the opponents to unite under a single umbrella in a short time and form the main opposition in the country. The opponents which first came to the fore with civilian protest movements then continued their struggle against the government with armed attacks. In this article we are going to analyse the ―Arab Spring‖ in Libya which broke out in February 2011 leaving its mark that year and investigate the positive and negative effects.
Article
Unprecedented street protests brought down Mubarak’s government and ushered in an era of competition between three rival political groups in Egypt. Using daily variation in the number of protesters, we document that more intense protests are associated with lower stock market valuations for firms connected to the group currently in power relative to non-connected firms, but have no impact on the relative valuations of firms connected to rival groups. These results suggest that street protests serve as a partial check on political rent-seeking. General discontent expressed on Twitter predicts protests but has no direct effect on valuations. Received February 12, 2016; editorial decision April 5, 2017 by Editor Andrew Karolyi.
Article
During Egypt's Arab Spring, unprecedented popular mobilization and protests brought down Hosni Mubarak's government and ushered in an era of competition between three groups: elites associated with Mubarak's National Democratic Party (NDP), the military, and the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. Street protests continued to play an important role during this power struggle. We show that these protests are associated with differential stock market returns for firms connected to the three groups. Using daily variation in the number of protesters, we document that more intense protests in Tahrir Square are associated with lower stock market valuations for firms connected to the group currently in power relative to non-connected firms, but have no impact on the relative valuations of firms connected to other powerful groups. We further show that activity on social media may have played an important role in mobilizing protesters, but had no direct effect on relative valuations. According to our preferred interpretation, these events provide evidence that, under weak institutions, popular mobilization and protests have a role in restricting the ability of connected firms to capture excess rents.