ArticlePDF Available
Journal of Advances in M athematics and C omputer Science
28(1) : 1- 7, 2018; Ar ticle no. JA MCS. 41557
IS SN: 245 6- 9968
(P as t n am e:
Br it is h Jou rn al o f Ma th em at ics & C om pu te r Sc ie nc e,
Pa st
IS SN : 22 31 -0 851 )
_____________________________________
*Corresponding author: E-mail: ajisco4live@yahoo.com;
Two-Step Hybrid Block Method for Solving First Order
Ordinary Differential Equations Using Power Series Approach
G. Ajileye
1*
, S. A. Amoo
1
and O. D. Ogwumu
1
1
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Federal University, Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria.
Authors’ contributions
This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author GA designed the study, performed
the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Author SAA managed
the analyses of the study. Author ODO managed the literature searches. All authors read and approved the
final manuscript.
Article Information
DOI: 10.9734/JAMCS/2018/41557
Editor(s):
(1) Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Chair of Computer Science and Management in this Department, Technical
University of Koszalin, Poland.
Reviewers:
(1) Abdu Masanawa Sagir, Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic, Nigeria.
(2)
Aliyu Bhar Kisabo, Center for Space Transport and Propulsion, National Space Reseach and Development Agency, Nigeria.
Complete Peer review History:
http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/25575
Received: 25
th
February 2018
Accepted: 3
rd
May 2018
Published: 16
th
July 2018
_______________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the derivation of hybrid block method for the solution of general first order
Initial Value Problem (IVP) in Ordinary Differential Equation. We adopted the method of Collocation
and Interpolation using power series approximation to generate the continuous formula. The properties
and features of the methods are analyzed and some numerical examples are also presented to illustrate the
accuracy and effectiveness of the method.
Keywords: Collocation; interpolation; linear multistep method; hybrid and power series polynomial.
1 Introduction
In recent times, the integration of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) is carried out using block methods.
In this paper, we propose an order five hybrid block integrator method for the solution of first order ODEs of
the form:
Original Research Article
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
2
=(,), ()=
,[.] (1.0)
Where is continuous within the interval of integration[,]. We assume that satisfies Lipchitz condition
which guarantees the existence and uniqueness of solution of (1.0).The discrete solution of (1.0) using linear
multistep method has being studied by authors like [1] and continuous solution of (1.0) [2] and [3,4]. One
important advantage of the continuous over discrete approach is the ability to provide discrete schemes for
simultaneous integration. These discrete schemes can be reformulated to general linear methods (GLM) [5].
The block methods are self-starting and can be applied to both stiff and non-stiff initial value problem in
differential equations. More recently, authors like [6,7,8,9] and [10] to mention few proposed methods
ranging from predictor- corrector to hybrid block method for initial value problem in ordinary differential
equation.
In this work, hybrid block method using Power series expansion will be considered. This will help in coming
up with a more computationally reliable integrator that can solve first order differential equations problems
of the form (1.0).
2 Derivation of Hybrid Method
In this section, we intend to construct the proposed two-step linear multistep method which will be used to
generate the main method and other methods required to set up the block method. We consider the power
series polynomial of the form:
()=

(2.0)
which is used as our basis to produce an approximate solution to (1.0) as
()=


(3.0)
and

()=



=(,) (4.0)
where
are the parameters to be determined, and are the points of collocation and interpolation
respectively. This process leads to (+1) of non-linear system of equations with unknown coefficients,
which are to be determined by the use of Maple 17 Mathematical software.
3 Hybrid Block Method
Using equation (3.0) and (4.0), m=1 and t=5 our choice of degree of polynomial is (+1). Equation
(3.0) is interpolated at the point =
and equation (4.0) is collocated at =(0,
,1,
,2) which lead to
system of equation of the form



=

=0 (5.0)




=

=(0,
,1,
,2) (6.0)
With the mathematical software, we obtained the continuous formulation of equations (5.0) and (6.0) of the
form
()=
+ℎ[
+

+

+

+

] (7.0)
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
3
After obtaining the values of
and
, =0 and =(0,
,1
,2) in (7.0)
We evaluated at the point =

,=(1,
,
,2) which gives the following set of discrete schemes to
form our hybrid block method.

=
+29
180ℎ
+31
45ℎ
/
+2
15ℎ

+1
45ℎ
/
1
180

/
=
+251
1440ℎ
+323
720ℎ
/
11
60ℎ

+53
720ℎ
/
19
1440ℎ

/
=
+


ℎ
+


ℎ
/
+

ℎ

+


ℎ
/

ℎ

(8.0)

=
+7
45ℎ
+32
45ℎ
/
+4
15ℎ

+32
45ℎ
/
+7
45ℎ

Equations (8.0) are of uniform order five, with error constant as follows
[1
5760,3
10240,3
10240,1
15120]
4 Consistency
Definition: The Linear Multistep method is said to be consistent if it is of order P≥ 1 and its first and second
characteristic polynomial defined as ()=

and ()=

where Z satisfies
()
=0,()
(1)=0,()


(1)=2!(1), See [1].
The discrete Schemes derived are all of order greater than one and satisfy the condition (i)-(iii).
5 Zero Stability of the Block Method
The block method is defined by [11] as
=

+


ℎ
=[
,

,

,,

]
T
=[
,

,

,,

]
T
and
are chosen r x r matrix coefficient and =0,1,2 represents the block number, =, the
first step number in the m-th block and r is the proposed block size.
The block method is said to be zero stable if the roots of
,=1(1) of the first characteristics polynomial
is
()=det


=0,
=
satisfies |R
j
|≤ 1, if one of the roots is +1, then the root is called Principal Root of ().
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
4
2
2/3
1
2/1
1
2/1
2/3
2
2/3
2/1
1
45
7
45
32
15
4
45
32
160
3
80
21
20
9
80
51
1440
19
720
53
60
11
720
323
180
1
45
1
15
2
45
31
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0100
0010
0001
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
f
f
f
f
h
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
f
f
f
f
2/1
1
2/3
45
7
000
160
27
000
1440
251
000
180
29
000
where
()
=
1000
0100
0010
0001
,
()
=
1000
1000
1000
1000
,
()
=
45
7
45
32
15
4
45
32
160
3
80
21
20
9
80
51
1440
19
720
53
60
11
720
323
180
1
45
1
15
2
45
31
and
()
=
45
7
000
160
27
000
1440
251
000
180
29
000
The first characteristics polynomial of the scheme is
()=det[
]
()=
1000
1000
1000
1000
000
000
000
000
()=
1000
100
100
100
0
1000
100
100
100
(1)=0
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
5
=
=
=0
=1
We can see clearly that no root has modulus greater than one (i.e.
1) ⍱. The hybrid block method is
zero stable.
6 Numerical Examples
Problem 1:
=,(0)=1,=0.1
Exact Solution: ()=exp()
Table 1. Comparison of approximate solution of problem 1
x Exact solution
Proposed scheme Error in proposed
scheme
Error in [2]
0.1 1.105170918075648 1.105170917860730 2.149179E-10 1.226221039551945e-05
0.2
1.221402758160170
4.7505E-10
1.355183832019158e-05
0.3
1.349858807576003
1.349858806788490
7.875129E-10
1.497709759790133e-05
0.4 1.491824697641270 1.491824696480820 1.16045E-09 1.655225270247307e-05
0.5 1.648721270700128 1.648721269097010 1.603118E-09 1.829306831546695e-05
0.6 1.822118800390509 1.822118798264440 2.126069E-09 2.021696710463594e-05
0.7 2.013752707470477 2.013752704729200 2.741277E-09 2.234320409577606e-05
0.8
2.225540928492468
5.989459E-09
2.469305938346267e-05
0.9 2.459603111156950 2.459603106852120 4.30483-09 2.729005110868599e-05
1.0 2.718281828459046 2.718281824122030 4.337016E-09 3.01601708376864e-05
Fig. 1. Plot of error in proposed scheme and error in [2]
0.00E+00
5.00E-06
1.00E-05
1.50E-05
2.00E-05
2.50E-05
3.00E-05
3.50E-05
1
3
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Error in proposed Scheme
Error in [2]
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
6
Problem 2:
=0.5(1),(0)=0.5,=0.1
Exact Solution: ()=10.5e−0.5x
Table 2. Comparison of approximate solution of problem 2
x Exact solution Proposed scheme Error in proposed scheme Error in [7]
0.1
0.524385287749643
0.524385287750861
1.218026E-13
5.574430e-012
0.2 0.547581290982020 0.547581290981880 1.399991E-13 3.946177e-012
0.3 0.569646011787471 0.569646011786286 1.184941E-12 8.183232e-012
0.4
0.590634623461009
0.590634623462548
1.538991E-12
3.436118e-011
0.5 0.610599608464297 0.610599608463187 1.110001E-12 1.929743e-010
0.6
0.629590889659141
0.629590889658614
5.270229E-12
1.879040e-010
0.7 0.647655955140643 0.647655955142752 2.10898E-12 1.776835e-010
0.8 0.664839976982180 0.664839976969201 1.297895E-11 1.724676e-010
0.9
0.681185924189113
0.681185924158290
3.08229E-11
1.847545e-010
1.0 0.696734670143683 0.696734670139561 4.121925E-11 3.005770e-010
Fig. 2. Plot of error in proposed scheme and error in [7]
7 Discussion of Result
We observed that from the two problems tested with this proposed block hybrid method the
results converges to exact solutions and also compared favourably with the existing similar methods (see
Tables 1, 2).
8 Conclusion
In this paper, we have presented Hybrid block method algorithm for the solution of first order ordinary
differential equations. The approximate solution adopted in this research produced a block method with
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.50E-10
2.00E-10
2.50E-10
3.00E-10
3.50E-10
12345678910
Error in proposed Scheme
Error in [7]
Ajileye et al.; JAMCS, 28(1): 1-7, 2018; Article no.JAMCS.41557
7
stability region. This made it to perform well on problems. The block method proposed was found to be
zero-stable, consistent and convergent.
Competing Interests
Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
[1] Lambert JD. Computational methods in ordinary differential equations. John Willey and Sons,
NewYork; 1973.
[2] Ayinde SO, Ibijola EA. A new numerical method for solving first order differential equations.
American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2015;3(4):156-160.
[3] Onumanyi, et al. New linear multistep methods with continuous coefficients for the first order
ordinary initial value problems. Nig. J. Math. Soc. 1994;13:37-51.
[4] Onumanyi, et al. Continuous finite differential approximation for solving differential equations. Int.
J.Comp. Math. 1999;72:15-27.
[5] Butcher JC. General linear method for the parallel solution of differential equations. App. Anal. 1993;
2:99-111.
[6] James AA, Adesanya AO, Sunday J. Uniform order continuous block hybrid method for the solution
of first order ordinary differential equations. IOSR J. Math; 2012.
[7] Sunday J, Adesanya AO, Odekunle MR. Order six block integrator for the solution of first order
ordinary differential equations. International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing. 2013;3(1):
87–96.
[8] Mohammed U, Yahaya YA. Fully implicit four points block backward difference formula for solving
first-order IVP. Leonado J. Sci. 2010;16(1):21-30.
[9] Skwame Y, Sunday J, Ibijola EA. L-stable block hybrid Simpson’s methods for Numerical solution of
IVP in stiff ODE’s. Int. J. Pure. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2012;11(2):45-54.
[10] Donald JZ, et al. Construction of two steps Simpson’s multistep method as parallel integrator for the
solution of ordinary differential equation. Bagale J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2009;7:1-12.
[11] Fatunla SO. Numerical methods for initial value problems in Ordinar differential equations. New
York: Academic Press. 1988;398.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
© 2018 Ajileye et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here (Please copy paste the total link in your
browser address bar)
http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/25575
... On the contrary, the efficiency of 3-point hybrid block AMM is proven when smaller step sizes are used as it is capable of outperforming at a step size 10 −6 for each problem. Tab. 1 depicts the comparison of the numerical outcomes by 3-point hybrid block AMM with the two-step block hybrid method by Ajileye et al. [30] and 3-step hybrid Adams type methods by Yahaya et al. [43] for the SIR model. Absolute error was computed by finding the difference between the exact solution and proposed method's solution at distinctive values of t. ...
... Absolute error was computed by finding the difference between the exact solution and proposed method's solution at distinctive values of t. The solution of the 3-point hybrid block AMM performs better than [30,43]. ...
... As a result, the 3-point hybrid block AMM, which developed a block method of order six using Lagrange interpolation as an approximation solution, performs better, and the error analysis reveals that the proposed method is giving more accurate results in comparisons to the other approaches. In Tab. 1, it is observed that the proposed method reduces the error, approximately by the average of 33% and 41% compared to [30,43] respectively. The efficiency of the proposed method can also be checked from Tabs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Multistep integration methods are being extensively used in the simulations of high dimensional systems due to their lower computational cost. The block methods were developed with the intent of obtaining numerical results on numerous points at a time and improving computational efficiency. Hybrid block methods for instance are specifically used in numerical integration of initial value problems. In this paper, an optimized hybrid block Adams block method is designed for the solutions of linear and nonlinear first-order initial value problems in ordinary differential equations (ODEs). In deriving the method, the Lagrange interpolation polynomial was employed based on some data points to replace the differential equation function and it was integrated over a specified interval. Furthermore, the convergence properties along with the region of stability of the method were examined. It was concluded that the newly derived method is convergent, consistent, and zero-stable. The method was also found to be A-stable implying that it covers the whole of the left/negative half plane. From the numerical computations of absolute errors carried out using the newly derived method, it was found that the method performed better than the ones with which we compared our results with. The method also showed its superiority over the existing methods in terms of stability and convergence.
... On the contrary, the efficiency of 3-point hybrid block AMM is proven when smaller step sizes are used as it is capable of outperforming at a step size 10 −6 for each problem. Tab. 1 depicts the comparison of the numerical outcomes by 3-point hybrid block AMM with the two-step block hybrid method by Ajileye et al. [30] and 3-step hybrid Adams type methods by Yahaya et al. [43] for the SIR model. Absolute error was computed by finding the difference between the exact solution and proposed method's solution at distinctive values of t. ...
... Absolute error was computed by finding the difference between the exact solution and proposed method's solution at distinctive values of t. The solution of the 3-point hybrid block AMM performs better than [30,43]. ...
... As a result, the 3-point hybrid block AMM, which developed a block method of order six using Lagrange interpolation as an approximation solution, performs better, and the error analysis reveals that the proposed method is giving more accurate results in comparisons to the other approaches. In Tab. 1, it is observed that the proposed method reduces the error, approximately by the average of 33% and 41% compared to [30,43] respectively. The efficiency of the proposed method can also be checked from Tabs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Over the years, the systematic search for stiff model solvers that are near-optimal has attracted the attention of many researchers. An attempt has been made in this research to formulate an implicit Four-Point Hybrid Block Integrator (FPHBI) for the simulations of some renowned rigid stiff models. The integrator is formulated by using the Lagrange polynomial as basis function. The properties of the integrator which include order, consistency, and convergence were analyzed. Further analysis showed that the proposed integrator has an A-stability region. The A-stability nature of the integrator makes it more robust and fitted for the simulation of stiff models. To test the computational reliability of the new integrator, few well-known technical stiff models such as the pharmacokinetics, Robertson and Van der Pol models were solved. The results generated were then compared with those of some existing methods including the MATLAB solid solvent, ode 15s. From the results generated, the new implicit FPHBI performed better than the ones with which we compared our results with.
Article
Full-text available
In this research, the construction of L-stable block hybrid Simpson's methods for parallel implementation is discussed. Methods of orders 4, 5 and 6 are constructed with numerical experiments. The newly constructed L-stable methods for k=2 have shown to handle stiff equations while methods for k=3 and 4 do not handle stiff equations.
Article
Full-text available
We know that for any numerical method to be efficient and computational reliable, it must be convergent, consistent, and stable. This paper adopted the method of interpolation of the approximate solution and collocation ofits differential system at grid and off grid points to yield a continuous linear multistep method with a constant step size. The continuous linear multistep method is solved for the independent solution to yield a continuous block method which is evaluated at selected grid and off grid points to yield a discrete block method. The basic property of this method is verified to be convergent consistent and satisfies the conditions for stability. The method was tested on numerical examples and found to compete favorably withthe existing methods in term of accuracy and error variation.
Article
Full-text available
The four steps Backward Differentiation Formulae (BDF) were reformulated for applications in the continuous form. The process produces some schemes which are combined in order to form an accurate and efficient block method for parallel or sequential solution of ordinary differential equations (ODE’s). The suggested approach eliminates requirement for a starting value and its speed proved to be up when computations with the Block Discrete schemes were used.
Article
In recent papers continuous finite difference (FD) approximations have been developed for the solution of the initial value problem (ivp) for first order ordinary differential equations (odes). They provide dense output of accurate solutions and global error estimates for the ivp economically. In this paper we show that some continuous FD formulae can be used to provide a uniform treatment of both the ivp and the boundary value problem (bvp) without using the shooting method for the latter. Higher order accurate solutions can be obtained on the same meshes with constant spacing used by one-step method without using the iterated deferred correction technique. No additional conditions are required to ensure low order continuity and this leads to fewer necessary equations than those required by most of the popular methods for bvps. No quadratures are involved in this non-overlapping piecewise continuous polynomial technique. Some computed results are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed method and global error estimates.
A new numerical method for solving first order differential equations
  • S O Ayinde
  • E A Ibijola
Ayinde SO, Ibijola EA. A new numerical method for solving first order differential equations. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2015;3(4):156-160.