Content uploaded by Santosh Bhattarai
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Santosh Bhattarai on Jul 18, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
2018 • VOLUME 12 • NUMBER 1
ISSN: 1083-446X eISSN: 1525-9153
Published in the United States of America
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
AMPHIBIAN & REPTILE
CONSERVATION
35
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
12(1) [General Section]: 35–48 (e155).
Amphibians and reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
1Santosh Bhattarai, 1,2Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral, 1Babu Ram Lamichhane, 3Uba Raj Regmi,
3Ashok Kumar Ram, and 4Naresh Subedi
1National Trust for Nature Conservation - Biodiversity Conservation Center, Ratnanagar-6, Sauraha, Chitwan-44204, NEPAL 2National Trust for
Nature Conservation-Central Zoo, Jawalakhel, Lalitpur, NEPAL 3Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Parsa National Park,
NEPAL 4National Trust for Nature Conservation-Khumaltar, Lalitpur, NEPAL
Abstract.—We report the results of a herpetofaunal inventory between July, 2014 and March, 2017 of Parsa
National Park that detected 51 herpetofaunal species. Three amphibians (Microhyla nilphamariensis,
Sphaerotheca breviceps, and Uperodon taprobanicus), two Gecko species (Hemidactylus aviviridis and
H. frenatus), one Agamid (Sitana fusca), two Skinks (Eutropis carinata and Sphenomorphus maculatus), 13
snakes (Ahaetulla nasuta, Bungarus lividus, Coelognathus helena, Coelognathus radiatus, Chrysopelea ornata,
Dendrelaphis tristis, Lycodon aulicus, Lycodon jara, Oligodon arnensis, Psammodynastes pulverulentus, Ptyas
mucosa, Rhabdophis subminiatus, and Trimeresurus albolabris), and one crocodile (Crocodylus palustris) are
new records to Parsa National Park. This paper aims to highlight the understanding of amphibians and reptiles
of Parsa National Park and will be a reference for herpetofaunal management in the park.
Keywords. Herpetofauna, biodiversity, conservation, protected area, Terai-Arc Landscape, new records
Citation: Bhattarai S, Pokheral CP, Lamichhane BR, Regmi UR, Ram AK, Subedi N. 2018. Amphibians and reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 12(1) [General Section]: 35–48 (e155).
Copyright: © 2018 Bhattarai et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use for non-commercial and education purposes only, in any medium, provided
the original author and the ofcial and authorized publication sources are recognized and properly credited. The ofcial and authorized publication
credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are as follows: ofcial journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; ofcial journal website <amphibian-
reptile-conservation.org>.
Received: 23 January 2018; Accepted: 20 February 2018; Published: 17 July 2018
Ofcial journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Correspondence. 1 santosh.bhattarai@hotmail.com (Corresponding author)
Introduction
Globally, amphibians and reptiles are among the least
studied vertebrate taxa (Fazey et al. 2005). The amphib-
ians and reptiles of Nepal have a wide range of both ver-
tical and horizontal distribution. However, the eld of
herpetology has always received less priority than other
vertebrates (Bhattarai et al. 2017). Among herpetofaunal
species, only the gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) subjected
to long term monitoring and conservation efforts (Acha-
rya et al. 2017). Information on species richness and
distribution of amphibians and reptiles in management
plans of many Protected Areas of Nepal including Parsa
National Park (PNP) are poorly documented. Past stud-
ies by Schleich and Kästle (2002) and Shah and Tiwari
(2004) recorded 37 species from the PNP and lack de-
tailed locality information. Since then, several taxonomic
revisions of the species have been done. In addition to
this, Kästle et al. (2013) listed eight species of herpeto-
fauna which underestimates the species richness of the
PNP. Here, we provide the comprehensive checklist on
species richness with natural history data to highlight un-
derstanding of the amphibian and reptile fauna of Parsa
National Park.
Study Area
Parsa National Park (PNP), the youngest National Park
in the country, was established in 1984 as Wildlife Re-
serve and upgraded to National Park in 2017. It is geo-
graphically located within 27°15’ to 27°33’N, 84°41’ to
84°58’E. The unique sub-tropical dry ecosystem was
established to protect habitat mainly for the resident
population of wild Asian elephant (Elephas maximus).
However, it also provides a habitat for migratory wild-
life species and a dispersal site for spill-over popula-
tion of Chitwan National Park to which it is connected
at its western boundary and Valmaki Tiger Reserve of
India to the South. Examples are the Asian one-horned
Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), Royal Bengal tiger
(Panthera tigris) and Gaur (Bos gaurus). Understanding
the potential to conserve many charismatic species, the
Government of Nepal extended the area of the PNP in
2015 and the current area is 627 km2 (Fig. 1). Besides its
biodiversity conservation value, the PNP is also serving
the vital needs of the large human population living south
of the park by conserving water sources in the Siwalik
hill and has reduced the soil erosion in the hill. The PNP
includes mainly sub-tropical forests of the Siwalik and
36
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Bhattarai et al.
Bhabar physiographic regions of Parsa, Makwanpur and
Bara districts. The vegetation is mainly dominated by Sal
(Shorea robusta) forest, and riverbeds and ood plains
are covered by Saccharum spontaneum and Imperata cy-
lindrica (Chhetri 2003). Although the PNP is connected
with Chitwan National Park (Nepal) and Valmiki Tiger
Reserve (India), very little information on species rich-
ness and diversity is available (Lamichhane et al. 2017).
We concentrated our search effort near permanent water
bodies and articially created ponds inside the park. Field
investigations were conducted at Rambhori-Bhata, Halk-
horia Daha, Amlekhganj-Hattisar, Adhabhar, Ghodema-
san, Mahadev Khola, Gaduwa-line, and Nirmalbasti,
Ramauli-Pratappur.
Field Methods
We conducted surveys in both the dry and wet seasons.
We used the visual encounter survey protocol (Heyer
et al. 1994) and active searches from 10–20 July, 2014,
15–27 March, 2015, 18–21 June, 2015, 04–10 February,
2016, 17–25 July, 2016, and 03–09 March, 2017. We
covered all major sites within the park. Our search effort
focused on recording the diverse herpetological commu-
nity as efciently as possible. On each expedition, we
spent three hours of intensive search combined with op-
portunistic records. During the survey, on detection of an
animal, we recorded the location, date, time, and micro-
habitat. We did not use dogs or chemicals or any auditory
cues for species detection. However, we included op-
portunistic records of various herpetofauna encountered
elsewhere within the PNP in our results. Photographs of
detected animals were taken whenever possible and used
as visual evidence for verifying species identications.
We used keys described in Smith (1935), Schleich and
Kästle (2002), and Shah and Tiwari (2004) for identica-
tion. We followed Frost (2017) for nomenclature of am-
phibians and Uetz et al. (2017) for reptiles.
Results
We recorded 12 species of amphibians in eight genera
and four families of anurans (Table 1), and 39 species of
reptiles which consisted of ve species of skinks, three
species of Geckonids, two species of Agamids, two spe-
cies of monitor lizards, 25 snake species, and one tortoise
and crocodile each (Table 1). We recorded 22 additional
species in the area which accounted for 51 species of the
herpetofauna in the PNP. These additional species consist
of three species of anurans, two species of gecko, two
species of skinks, 13 snake species, and one crocodile
species.
Species Accounts
AMPHIBIANS
Bufonidae (Gray 1825)
Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider 1799): Recorded
from Amlekhganj-Hattisar, Adhabhar, Rambhori-Bhata,
Halkhoria Daha, Nirmalbasti, and Ramauli-Pratapur.
This was commonly seen in and around human settle-
ments during monsoon. Road-killed individuals of this
Fig. 1. Study location, Parsa National Park.
37
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
Table 1. Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal. An asterisk (*) denotes new records to the area.
S.N. Species IUCN Status
AMPHIBIANS
Bufonidae Gray, 1825
1. Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider 1799) LC
2. D. stomaticus (Lütken 1864) LC
Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871
3. Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider 1799) LC
4. Fejarvarya syhadrensis (Annandale 1919) LC
5. Fejarvarya teraiensis (Dubois 1984) LC
6. Hoplobatrachus crassus (Jerdon 1853) LC
7. Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin 1802) LC
8. *Sphaerotheca breviceps (Schneider 1799) LC
Microhylidae Gunther, 1858
9. *Microhyla cf. nilphamariensis (Howlader, Nair, Gopalan, and Merila 2015) LC
10. Uperodon globulosus (Günther 1864) LC
11. *Uperodon taprobanicus (Parker 1934) LC
Rhacophoridae Hoffman, 1932 (1858)
12. Polypedates maculatus (Gray 1830) LC
REPTILES
Gekkonidae Gray, 1825
13. Hemidactylus cf. brookii Gray, 1845 NA
14. *Hemidactylus aviviridis Rüppell, 1835 LC
15. *Hemidactylus frenatus Dúmeril and Bibron, 1836 LC
Agamidae Gray, 1827
16. Calotes versicolor (Daudin 1802) NA
17. *Sitana fusca Schleich and Kästle, 1998 NA
Scincidae Gray, 1825
18. *Eutropis carinata (Schneider 1801) LC
19. Eutropis dissimilis (Hallowell 1857) NA
20. Eutropis macularia (Blyth 1853) NA
21. Lygosoma punctata (Gmelin 1799) NA
22. *Sphenomorphus maculatus (Blyth 1853) NA
Varanidae Merrem, 1820
23. Varanus bengalensis (Daudin 1802) LC
24. Varanus avescens (Hardwicke and Gray 1827) NA
Typhlopidae Merrem, 1820
25. Indotyphlops braminus (Daudin 1803) NA
Boidae Gray, 1825
26. Eryx conicus (Schneider 1801) NA
Pythonidae Fitzinger, 1826
27. Python bivittatus Kuhl, 1820 VU
Colubridae Oppel, 1811
28. *Ahaetulla nasuta (Bonnaterre 1790) NA
29. Boiga trigonata (Schneider 1802) LC
30. *Coelognathus helenam (Daudin 1803) NA
31. *Coelognathus radiatus (Boie 1827) LC
32. *Chrysopelea ornata (Shaw 1802) NA
33. *Dendrelaphis tristis (Daudin 1803) NA
38
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
species were frequently observed in the east-west nation-
al highway between Amlekhgunj and Adhabhar segment.
This is the most common bufonid in Terai, Nepal (Fig.
2).
Fig. 2. Duttaphrynus melanostictus. Photograph by Kapil
Pokharel/NTNC-BCC.
Duttaphrynus stomaticus (Lütken 1864): This was fre-
quently encountered at NTNC-Parsa Conservation Pro-
gram Ofce complex, Hattisar, Amlekhganj, Adhabhar,
Ramauli-Pratappur, Bhata, and Nirmalbasti (Fig. 3). The
individuals can be distinguished from D. melanostictus
by absence of canthal black ridge and smaller tympanum.
Fig. 3. Duttaphrynus stomaticus. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Dicroglossidae (Anderson 1871)
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider 1799): The most
common frog of Terai Nepal within and outside protected
areas commonly encountered in water pools (Fig. 4).
Bhattarai et al.
S.N. Species IUCN Status
Colubridae Oppel, 1811
34. *Lycodon aulicus (Linnaeus 1758) NA
35. *Lycodon jara (Shaw 1802) LC
36. *Oligodon arnensis (Shaw 1802) NA
37. *Psammodynastes pulverulentus (Boie 1827) NA
38. *Ptyas mucosa (Linnaeus 1758) NA
39. Sibynophis sagittarius (Cantor 1839) NA
Elapidae F. Boie, 1827
40. Bungarus caeruleus (Schneider 1801) NA
41. Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider 1801) LC
42. *Bungarus lividus Cantor, 1839 NA
43. Naja naja (Linnaeus 1758) NA
44. Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor 1836) VU
Natricidae Bonaparte, 1838
45. Amphiesma stolatum (Linnaeus 1758) NA
46. Xenochropis piscator (Schneider 1799) NA
47. *Rhabdophis subminiatus (Schlegel 1837) NA
Viperidae Oppel, 1811
48. Daboia russelii (Shaw and Nodder 1797) LC
49. *Trimeresurus albolabris Gray, 1842 NA
Testudinidae Batsch, 1788
50. Indotestudo elongata (Blyth 1854) EN
Crocodylidae Cuvier, 1806
51. *Crocodylus palustris Lesson, 1831 VU
Table 1. Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal. An asterisk (*) denotes new records to the area.
39
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Fig. 4. Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Fejarvarya syhadrensis (Annandale 1919): The indi-
viduals we recorded had no mid dorsal line with reddish
orange patches which is characteristic of this species
(Schleich and Kästle 2002). We recorded this species
along marshy lands in the ponds inside the park.
Fejervarya teraiensis (Dubois 1984): The calling males
were recorded at puddles in Amlekhgunj, Adhabar, and
Bhata. The individuals had a cream colored mid dorsal
line with dorsolateral fold. According to Schleich and
Kästle (2002), this species is well distributed in the entire
Terai from 71 to 400 m.
Hoplobatrachus crassus (Jerdon 1853): We found an in-
dividual of this species at an army post in Gaduwaline
inside the park. Shah and Tiwari (2004) also recorded
this species from Parsa.
Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin 1802): This is the
largest frog of Terai region. Yellow colored breeding
males were frequently observed in puddles during mon-
soon (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Hoplobatrachus tigerinus. Photograph by Santosh
Bhattarai.
Sphaerotheca breviceps (Schneider 1799): Almost toad-
like, stocky with distinct supratympanal fold. We found
some specimens in Halkhoria Daha and Amlekhgunj-
Hattisar area during June and July and calling males were
also observed. This is the rst record to Parsa National
Park.
Fig. 6. Sphaerotheca breviceps. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Microhylidae (Günther 1843, 1858)
Microhyla cf. nilphamariensis (Howlader, Nair, Gopa-
lan, and Merila 2015): The type locality of this frog is
Koya Golahut, Saidpur, Nilphamari, Bangladesh. Re-
cently, Khatiwada et al. (2017) recorded it from central
and eastern Nepal and proposed the Chitwan population
to be M. nilphamarariensis based on molecular and call
records. We believe the Parsa population to be M. nil-
phamariensis (Fig. 7). However, only detailed molecular
study will resolve its taxonomy.
Fig. 7. Microhyla cf. nilphamariensis. Photograph by Santosh
Bhattarai.
Uperodon globulosus (Günther 1864): This bulky globu-
lar frog is frequently seen during monsoon, when calling
males were seen during the night in Bhata area. Shah and
Tiwari (2004) also reported the occurrence of this species
from Parsa National Park (Fig. 8).
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
40
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Fig. 8. Uperodon globulosus. Photograph by Santosh Bhatta-
rai.
Uperodon taprobanicus (Parker 1934): This frog is gray-
ish black, and individuals have reddish-orange dorsolat-
eral irregular bands. Individuals with a mid-dorsal line
from snout to vent and with mid-dorsal line were record-
ed (Fig. 9). Males have folded black vocal sacs and were
observed in amplexus. According to Schleich and Kästle
(2002), this species is distributed from central to eastern
Nepal between 100 and 300 m elevation. Bhattarai et al.
(2017a) also recorded this species from Beeshazar and
associated lakes, a Ramsar site.
Fig. 9. Uperodon taprobanicus. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Rhacophoridae (Hoffman 1932)
Polypedates maculatus (Gray 1830): Calling males were
frequently observed at NTNC-Parsa Conservation Pro-
gram ofce complex during the monsoon. This species
was frequently observed on the ofce window and in the
bathroom (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10. Polypedates maculatus. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
REPTILES
Gekkonidae (Gray 1825)
Hemidactylus cf. brookii (Gray 1845): Individuals with
strongly keeled dorsal tubercles and tails with spines
were recorded. Schleich and Kästle (2002) recorded H.
brookii on buildings in Chitwan National Park. However,
we recorded them in dead logs inside the park in Parsa
National Park (Fig. 11). This species is regarded as a spe-
cies complex and has been proposed for detailed molecu-
lar studies to solve taxonomy of Nepalese populations
(Rösler and Glaw 2010; Kathriner et al. 2014).
Fig. 11. Hemidactylus brookii. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Hemidactylus aviviridis (Rüppell 1835): This is a com-
mon house gecko in the study area. Frequently seen at
houses, park guard posts and army posts, and the temple
inside the park, as well as villages nearby the park. This
is the rst record from the Parsa National Park.
Bhattarai et al.
41
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Hemidactylus frenatus (Dúmeril and Bibron 1836): We
reported two individuals of this species, photographed
at Bhata-Hattisar and Gaduwa. This is the rst record of
this species from Parsa National Park.
Agamidae (Gray 1827)
Calotes versicolor (Daudin 1802): This is the most
common diurnal agamid distributed from below 100 m
to 3,200 m in Nepal (Schleich and Kästle 2002). The
species was frequently observed in and out of the park
boundary (Fig. 12).
Fig. 12. Calotes versicolor. Photograph by Santosh Bhattarai.
Sitana fusca (Schleich and Kästle 1998): This species
was described from Bardibas, Mahottari district, Nepal
ca. 100 km east of Parsa National Park. This is the rst
record of Sitana from Parsa National Park. This species
was frequently observed at NTNC-Parsa Conservation
Program ofce complex, Bhedaha Khola, and Darau
Khola. In June 2016, a gravid female was observed nest-
ing in the ofce complex, and two hatchlings of same
species were encountered in August 2016 (Fig. 13).
Fig. 13. Nesting female of Sitana fusca. Photograph by Santosh
Bhattarai.
Scincidae (Gray 1825)
Eutropis carinata (Schneider 1801): Commonly ob-
served inside the park basking in open grassland and on
rocky substrates. Observed at Kamini Daha, Bhata, Ma-
hadev Khola, Halkhoria Daha, Ghode Masan, Ramauli-
Pratappur, Sikaribasb Bhedaha Khola, and Darau Khola.
This is one of the most commonly observed skinks in
Nepal. However, earlier researchers did not report it from
Parsa National Park (Fig. 14).
Fig. 14. Eutropis carinata. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Eutropis dissimilis (Hallowell 1857): Recorded from
Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Sikaribaas basking during winter.
This species is rarely seen compared to its congenerics in
Parsa National Park (Fig. 15).
Fig. 15. Eutropis dissimillis. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Eutropis macularia (Blyth 1853): Observed from Ka-
mini Daha, Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Bhata, Nirmalbasti,
Ramauli Pratappur, Mahadev Khola, and Ghode Masan
(Fig. 16).
Fig. 16. Eutropis macularia. Photograph by Binod Darai/
NTNC-BCC.
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
42
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Bhattarai et al.
Lygosoma punctata (Gmelin 1799): Observed from Bha-
ta, Adhabhar, Sikaribaas, and Shitalpur (Fig. 17).
Fig. 17. Lygosoma punctata. Photograph by Binod Darai/
NTNC-BCC.
Sphenomorphus maculatus (Blyth 1853): This species
was frequently observed in the foothills of Siwaliks in-
side the park and found basking on the rocks of dry river
beds (Fig. 18). This is the rst record for Parsa National
Park.
Fig. 18. Sphenomorphus maculatus. Photograph by Santosh
Bhattarai.
Varanidae (Merrem 1820)
Varanus bengalensis (Daudin 1802): Individuals were
observed at Kamini Daha, Masine area, Bhata, Adhab-
har-PNP ofce, Bhedaha Khola, Shitalpur, and Ramauli-
Pratapur. They were frequently observed at human habi-
tations at Amlekhgunj, and one adult was rescued from
the Nepal Oil Corporation’s ofce complex. The species
is frequently seen in holes of the Sal (Shorea robusta)
trees lying on the ground and on standing trees (Fig. 19).
Fig. 19. Varanus bengalensis. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Varanus avescens (Hardwicke and Gray 1827): This
species was frequently encountered in the buffer zone
around the PNP and in agricultural lands outside the
park boundary. It is a legally protected varanid of Nepal
which has been accorded the highest degree of protection
in Schedule-I under the National Parks and Wildlife Con-
servation Act, 1973. The species is facing severe threat
due to illegal hunting for its esh and skin. The skin of
varanids is used for making musical instruments by local
communities.
Typhlopidae (Merrem 1820)
Indotyphlops braminus (Daudin, 1803): The species was
observed from Kamini Daha living inside leaf litter.
Boidae (Gray 1825)
Eryx conicus (Schneider 1801): This species was en-
countered at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar (Fig. 20).
Fig. 20. Eryx conicus. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/NTNC-
BCC.
43
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Pythonidae (Fitzinger 1826)
Python bivittatus (Kuhl 1820): The python is the largest
snake species in Nepal and it is distributed from Nep-
alese Terai up to 2,800 m elevation in Nepal (Bhattarai
et al. 2017). In the PNP, the species was observed from
Bhata, Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Halkhoria Daha, and Ra-
mauli Pratapur (Fig. 21). The PNP has dry sub-tropical
habitat and gets incidental re. One injured python was
found with wounds inside the park at Kamini Daha.
Fig. 21. Python bivittatus. Photograph by Om P. Chaudhary/
NTNC-BCC.
Colubridae (Oppel 1811)
Ahaetulla nasuta (Bonnaterre 1790): An individual of
this species was observed at Mahadev Khola basking
on grasses and ew to the bush when approached. An-
other individual was observed at Shitalpur on a Mallotus
philippensis tree approximately 3.5 m from ground level.
We report this species for the rst time from the park.
Boiga trigonata (Schneider 1802): Many killed speci-
mens were found in the buffer villages and highway be-
tween Amlekhgunj and Pathlaiya section of the National
Park (Fig. 22).
Coelognathus helena (Daudin 1803): Observed from
Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Adhabhar-PNP ofce complex,
and Ramauli Pratapur. This is the rst record from Parsa
National Park.
Coelognathus radiatus (Boie 1827): Dead specimens
were found near human habitation, and an individual was
recorded at Kamini Daha. In May and June, the species
is frequently observed in buffer villages of the park, and
people kill the snakes when they encounter them.
Fig. 22. Boiga trigonata. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Chrysopelea ornata (Shaw 1802): A juvenile individual
was observed at Shikaribas Khola, and a dead specimen
was found at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar (Fig. 23). This is the
rst record from Parsa National Park.
Fig. 23. Chrysopelea ornata. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Dendrelaphis tristis (Daudin 1803): The basking indi-
viduals were encountered at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Bha-
ta-Hattisar, and Ghodemasan (Fig. 24). This is the rst
record from Parsa National Park.
Fig. 24. Dendrelaphis tristis. Photograph by Om P. Chaudhary/
NTNC-BCC.
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
44
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Lycodon aulicus (Linnaeus 1758): Observed at NTNC-
Parsa Conservation Program Ofce complex, and dead
individuals were found at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar. A bask-
ing individual was frequently observed in a crevice of
a cemented water tank (Fig. 25). This is the rst record
from Parsa National Park.
Fig. 25. Lycodon aulicus. Photograph by Santosh Bhattarai.
Lycodon jara (Shaw 1802): Observed at Amlekhgunj-
Hattisar. According to Schleich and Kästle (2002), it is
a rarely found species from Terai Nepal. However, there
are published reports of it in bordering states of India as
well. This is the rst record from Parsa National Park
(Fig. 26).
Fig. 26. Lycodon jara. Photograph by Santosh Bhattarai.
Oligodon arnensis (Shaw 1802): Observed from Amle-
khgunj-Hattisar and NTNC-Parsa Conservation Ofce
Complex (Fig. 27). This species is also frequently ob-
served in Chitwan National Park.
Fig. 27. Oligodon arnensis. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Psammodynastes pulverulentus (Boie 1827): According
to Schleich and Kästle (2002), the records of the species
were from Butwal, western Nepal, and Khotang, Uday-
pur, and Ilam from eastern Nepal. Recently, Bhattarai et
al. (2017) reported it from Ratomate-Harda Khola, Chit-
wan National Park. Later the species was also observed
at Triveni area of Chitwan National Park. In the PNP, the
species was observed at Ghodemasan area, being the rst
record from the PNP (Fig. 28).
Fig. 28. Psammodynastes pulverulentus. Photograph by Tirtha
Lama/NTNC-BCC, photograph taken at Triveni, Chitwan Na-
tional Park.
Bhattarai et al.
45
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Ptyas mucosa (Linnaeus 1758): Animals in combat were
observed on 7 June, 2016. A road-killed specimen in the
segment between Amlekhgunj and Adhabhar was record-
ed. Individuals were frequently observed at NTNC-Parsa
Conservation Ofce complex (Fig. 29). This report is the
rst record for Parsa National Park.
Fig. 29. Ptyas mucosa. Photograph by Santosh Bhattarai.
Sibynophis sagittarius (Cantor 1839): A specimen was
found at Ghodemasan area basking on a riverbed (Fig.
30).
Fig. 30. Sibynophis sagittarius. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel.
Elapidae (F. Boie 1827)
Bungarus caeruleus (Schneider 1801): Specimens ob-
served at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar. Killed specimens were
found near human habitation (Fig. 31).
Fig. 31. Bungarus caeruleus. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider 1801): One individual
was found crawling inside Amlekhgunj-Hattisar in July
2016.
Bungarus lividus (Cantor 1839): An individual was ob-
served at Bhata-Hattisar on forest trail towards Bhata-
temple. The second individual was found killed in Amle-
khgunj. This is the rst record from Parsa National Park.
Naja naja (Linnaeus 1758): An individual was found
basking in the riverbed of Bhedah Khola. Two individu-
als were found killed at human habitation at Amlekhgunj
(Fig. 32).
Fig. 32. Naja naja. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/NTNC-BCC.
Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor 1836): A dead specimen
was recorded at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar. Another individ-
ual was observed at Shitalpur camp in November 2016.
(Fig. 33).
Fig. 33. Ophiophagus hannah. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Natricidae (Bonaparte 1838)
Amphiesma stolatum (Linnaeus 1758): Frequently ob-
served at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar, Bhata-Hattisar, and Ad-
habhar-PNP ofce complex. An individual was observed
feeding on Duttaphrynus melanostictus at NTNC-Parsa
Conservation Ofce complex. Road kills observed in the
segment between Amlekhgunj and Adhabhar (Fig. 34).
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
46
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Fig. 34. Amphiesma stolatum. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Xenochrophis piscator (Schneider 1799): The species
was frequently observed in human habitation and a speci-
men was seen in the Bhata wetland (Fig. 35).
Fig. 35. Xenochropis piscator. Photograph by Kapil Pokharel/
NTNC-BCC.
Rhabdophis subminiatus (Schlegel 1837): Record of
this species was previously not reported from the PNP.
Schleich and Kästle (2002) reported it from the Chitwan
National Park. The specimen was recorded at Ghodema-
san area basking on a rock (Fig. 36) in November 2016.
Fig. 36. Rhabdophis subminiatus. Photograph by Dip Prasad
Chaudhary/NTNC-BCC.
Viperidae (Oppel 1811)
Daboia russelii (Shaw and Nodder 1797): A single indi-
vidual was observed from Bhata on the way to Rambhori
grassland. The individual was basking near a gabion wall
(Fig. 37).
Fig. 37. Daboia russelii. Photograph by Santosh Bhattarai.
Trimeresurus albolabris (Gray 1842): Two individuals
were observed at Kamini Daha in March 2014 and June
2015. The third individual was observed from Ramauli-
Pratapur in December 2016 (Fig. 38).
Fig. 38. Trimeresurus albolabris. Photograph by Kapil
Pokharel/NTNC-BCC.
Bhattarai et al.
47
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Testudinidae (Batsch 1788)
Indotestudo elongata (Blyth 1854): An individual was
observed at Ghodemasan. Two rescued individuals were
kept at Amlekhgunj-Hattisar. Later, they were released
inside the park. Local people, especially business people,
like to keep turtles and tortoises in captivity believing
they are a sign of good luck for their business (Fig. 39).
Fig. 39. Indotestudo elongata. Photograph by Santosh Bhat-
tarai.
Crocodylidae (Cuvier 1806)
Crocodylus palustris (Lesson 1831): An individual was
kept in an enclosure in Amlekhjung-Hattisar. Later, it
was released in a wetland inside the park at Bhata.
Discussion
Our short expeditions resulted in 22 new species records
for the PNP, including three species of frog, two geckos,
one Agamid, two skink species, 13 snake species, and
one crocodile. The details of new species recorded for the
PNP are in Table 1.
The record of Traschischium tenuiceps by Kästle et
al. (2013) from the PNP needs to be veried as the el-
evational range of the species in Nepal is 1,500–2,400 m
(Schleich and Kästle 2002). We presume that the species
was mistakenly reported from the PNP.
Our survey mainly focused on daytime searches due
to logistics. It is highly likely that many other amphibians
and reptiles remain to be added to the list, especially fos-
sorial and arboreal species. During our survey we failed
to document Eryx johnii (Russell 1801) as this species is
frequently observed in nearby areas.
Among the species we recorded, Varanus avescens
and Python sp. are legally protected species in Nepal.
The pythons are the only legally protected snake species
of Nepal which has been accorded the highest degree of
protection under the National Parks and Wildlife Con-
servation Act, 1973. The Act has included the python in
the Schedule-I as Python molurus. In 2009 Python bivit-
tatus was elevated to specic status, and the occurrence
of Python molurus in Nepal is doubtful (Bhattarai 2014).
Therefore, we suggest P. bivittatus be listed in the Act
instead of P. molurus.
The IUCN has evaluated the tortoise Indotestudo
elongata as an endangered species. Similarly, Crocody-
lus palustris, Ophiophagus hannah, and Python bivit-
tatus have been categorized as vulnerable species. The
rampant killing of snake species in the buffer zone of the
PNP is an observed threat. Buffer communities perceive
all snakes to be venomous despite the fact that only 17%
of Nepalese snakes are venomous (Bhattarai et al. 2017;
Sharma et al. 2013).
The national east-west highway bisects the park in the
Amlekhganj-Pathlaiya section where many wild species
are frequently observed trampled by the vehicular move-
ment. The regular monitoring of this section will reveal
the extent of wildlife loss due to vehicles.
The PNP shares its western boundary with Chitwan
National Park, and the Siwalik hill in the North might
have unique species as this park has comparatively drier
habitats. We believe detailed inventory will further in-
crease the species richness and diversity of the park.
Acknowledgements.—Amphibians and reptiles
were recorded during eld implementation of two proj-
ects: 1. Community Based Human-Elephant Conict
Management in Chitwan-Parsa Complex (Grant no#
F15AP00340), 2. Mitigating Human-Tiger Conict en-
gaging local community in Parsa National Park (Grant
no# F15AP00781). We would like to thank US Fish and
Wildlife Service for these two funds to NTNC-BCC. We
extend our gratitude to Department of National Parks
and Wildlife Conservation, Chitwan and Parsa Nation-
al Parks for endorsing these projects. We thank Kapil
Pokharel, Harka Man Lama, Om Prakash Chaudhary,
Ashish Gurung, Dip Prasad Chaudhary, Binod Darai, Ra-
mesh Darai, Tirtha Lama, and team NTNC-BCC for their
assistance in the eld. We also acknowledge ZSL Nepal
ofce for funding support to carryout camera trap sur-
vey in Parsa National Park. We would also like to thank
Mark O’Shea and Peter Uetz for their comments on the
draft manuscript. We would also acknowledge Abhijit
Das and two other reviewers for their comments on the
manuscript.
Literature Cited
Acharya KP, Khadka BK, Jnawali SR, Malla S, Bhatta-
rai S, Wikramanayake E, Kohl M. 2017. Conservation
and population recovery of Gharials (Gavialis gange-
ticus) in Nepal. Herpetologica 73(2): 129–135.
Bhattarai S, Gurung A, Chalise L, Pokheral CP. 2017.
Geographic Distribution: Psammodynastes pulveru-
lentus (Mock Viper). Herpetological Review 48(1):
129.
Bhattarai S, Pokheral CP, Lamicchane BR. 2017. Death-
feigning behavior in Burmese Python Python bivit-
tatus Kuhl, 1820 in Chitwan National Park. Russian
Journal of Herpetology 24(4): 323–326.
Bhattarai S, Pokheral CP, Lamichhane BR, Subedi N.
Amphibians and Reptiles of Parsa National Park, Nepal
48
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. July 2018 | Volume 12 | Number 1 | e155
Herpetofauna of a Ramsar Site: Beeshazar and As-
sociated Lakes, Chitwan National Park Nepal. IRCF
Reptiles & Amphibians 24(1): 17–29.
Bhattarai S, Thapa KB, Chalise L, Gurung A, Pokheral
CP, Subedi N, Thapa TB, Shah KB. 2017. On the dis-
tribution of the Himalayan Stripe-necked Snake Lio-
peltis rappi (Günther, 1860) (Serpentes: Colubridae)
in Nepal. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 11(1)
[General Section]: 88–92 (e139).
Bhattarai S. 2014. Population of Python bivittatus in Bar-
dia National Park, Nepal. M.Sc. Dissertation Report,
Department of Wildlife Science, University of Kota,
Rajasthan, India. 64 p.
Chetri M. 2003. Food habits of gaur Bos gaurus gaurus
Smith, 1827 and livestock (cows and buffaloes) in
Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Central Nepal. Himalayan
Journal of Sciences 1(1): 31–36.
Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. 2005. What do con-
servation biologists publish? Biological Conservation
124: 63–73.
Frost DR. 2017. Amphibian Species of the World: An
Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of
Natural History, New York, New York, USA. Avail-
able: http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/am-
phibia/ [Accessed: 25 November 2017].
Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC,
Foster MS. 1994. Measuring and Monitoring Bio-
logical Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians.
Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC, USA.
364 p.
Kästle W, Rai K, Schleich HH. 2013. Field Guide to
Amphibians and Reptiles of Nepal. ARCO-Nepal e.V.
Munich, Germany. 625 p.
Kathriner A, O’Shea M, Kaiser H. 2014. Re-examination
of Hemidactylus tenkatei van Lidth de Jeude, 1895:
Populations from Timor provide insight into the tax-
onomy of the H. brookii Gray, 1845 complex (Squa-
mata: Gekkonidae). Zootaxa 3887(5): 583–599.
Khatiwada JR, Guo CH, Wang SH, Thapa A, Wang B,
Jiang J. 2017. A new species of Microhyla (Anura:
Microhylidae) from Eastern Nepal. Zootaxa 4254(2):
221–239.
Lamichhane BR, Pokheral CP, Poudel S, Adhikari D,
Giri SR, Bhattarai S, Bhatta TR, Pickles R, Amin R,
Acharya KP, Dhakal M, Regmi UR, Ram AK, Sub-
edi N. 2017. Rapid recovery of tigers Panthera tigris
in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Oryx 52(1): 16–24.
doi:10.1017/S0030605317000886.
Rösler H, Glaw F. 2010. Morphological variation and
taxonomy of Hemidactylus brookii Gray, 1845, Hemi-
dactylus angulatus Hallowell, 1854, and similar taxa
(Squamata, Sauria, Gekkonidae). Spixiana 33: 139–
160.
Schleich HH, Kästle W. 2002. Amphibians and Reptiles
of Nepal. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientic Books, Ger-
many. 1,200 p.
Shah KB, Tiwari S. 2004. Herpetofauna of Nepal: A
Conservation Companion – Kathmandu. IUCN Ne-
pal, Kathmandu, Nepal. 237 p.
Sharma SK, Pandey DP, Shah KB, Tillack F, Chappuis F,
Thapa CL, Elirol E, Kuch U. 2013. Venomous Snakes
of Nepal: A Photographic Guide. B.P. Koirala Insti-
tute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. 86 p.
Smith, MA. 1935. The Fauna of British India, Including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia, Volume 2:
Sauria. Taylor and Francis, London, England. 440 p.
Uetz P, Freed P, Hošek J, editors. 2017. The Reptile Data-
base. Available: htpp://www.reptile-database.org [Ac-
cessed: 17 December 2017].
Bhattarai et al.
Santosh Bhattarai currently works as Conservation Ofcer at National Trust for Nature Conservation- Biodiversity
Conservation Center (NTNC-BCC), Sauraha, Chitwan, Nepal. He is particularly interested to understand evolutionary
and ecological drivers of amphibians and reptiles by which species diversify and accumulate through time and space.
Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral currently works as Program Manager at National Trust for Nature Conservation-
Central Zoo, Lalitpur, Nepal. He completed his Ph.D. in 2012 and has more than two decades of experience in species
conservation and management in Nepal. He is focused on tiger conservation in Nepal.
Babu Ram Lamichhane currently works as Research Ofcer at NTNC-BCC. He is interested in Human-Carnivore
interactions and is pursuing his doctoral study in the same topic.
Uba Raj Regmi works at Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. He has more than 25 years of
experience of managing Protected Areas in Nepal. He currently works as Chief Conservation Ofcer at Langtang
National Park, Nepal.
Ashok Kumar Ram works at Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. Currently, he is working
as Assistant Conservation Ofcer at Parsa National Park. He is focused on Human-Elephant conict management
issues.
Naresh Subedi completed his Ph.D. in 2012 and is currently based at NTNC-central ofce, Kathamandu, and works
in the capacity of Conservation Program Manager. His earlier studies focsed on impact of invasive species on native
wild animals and their conservation measures.