ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

CrossFit is a new form of physical training that has become popular since its inception. This study aimed to analyze the injury profile of CrossFit practitioners through a systematic review. PRISMA recommendations were applied to this systematic review. Electronic search was performed in the databases CINAHL, SciELO, Science Direct, SCOPUS, LILACS, PEDro, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed. Ten studies were selected. The prevalence of injuries in CrossFit practitioners ranged from 5 to 73.5%, and the overall injury incidence rate per 1000 training hours ranged from 1.94 to 3.1 injuries. The body region most affected by injuries was the shoulders, followed by the back and the knees. Regarding associated factors, the type of exercise performed and CrossFit training time were related to injuries. Besides that, sex was associated to the prevalence of injuries, with men showing more injuries than women. Age was not related to injury prevalence. It was concluded that the most commonly affected body region among CrossFit practitioners was the shoulders, predominantly in males and with previous injuries, often obtained in other modalities. In addition, CrossFit can be safely practiced by individuals aged 18-69.
Content may be subject to copyright.
DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/17014825022018
Corresponding address: Fábio Hech Dominski – Rua Pascoal Simone, 358, Coqueiros – Florianópolis (SC), Brazil – ZIP Code 88080-350 – E-mail:–
Telefone: (48) 3664-8677 – Finance source: Nothing to declare – Conflict of interests: Nothing to declare – Presentation: Aug. 9th, 2017 – Accepted for publication: May 24th, 2018.
Injury profile in CrossFit practitioners:
systematic review
Perl de lesões em praticantes de CrossFit: revisão sistemática
Perl de lesiones en los practicantes de CrossFit: revisión sistemática
Fábio Hech Dominski1, Thais Cristina Siqueira2, Thiago Teixeira Serafim3, Alexandro Andrade4
Study conducted in the Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology (Lape) of the Santa Catarina State University (Udesc) –
Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.
1Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology (LAPE) from the Center of Health and Sport Sciences (Cefid) of Santa Catarina State
University (Udesc) – Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.
2Department of Physical Therapy of the Center of Health and Sport Sciences(Cefid) of Santa Catarina State
University (Udesc) – Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.
3Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology (Lape) of the Santa Catarina State University (Udesc) – Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.
4Graduate Program in Human Movement Sciences at the Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology (LAPE) from the Center of
Health and Sport Sciences (Cefid) of Santa Catarina State University (Udesc) – Florianópolis (SC), Brazil.
ABSTRACT | CrossFit is a new form of physical training
that has become popular since its inception. This study
aimed to analyze the injury profile of CrossFit practitioners
through a systematic review. PRISMA recommendations
were applied to this systematic review. Electronic search
was performed in the databases CINAHL, SciELO, Science
Direct, SCOPUS, LILACS, PEDro, PubMed, SPORTDiscus
and Web of Science. The methodological quality of the
studies was assessed. Ten studies were selected. The
prevalence of injuries in CrossFit practitioners ranged
from 5 to 73.5%, and the overall injury incidence rate
per 1000 training hours ranged from 1.94 to 3.1 injuries.
The body region most aected by injuries was the
shoulders, followed by the back and the knees. Regarding
associated factors, the type of exercise performed and
CrossFit training time were related to injuries. Besides
that, sex was associated to the prevalence of injuries,
with men showing more injuries than women. Age was
not related to injury prevalence. It was concluded that the
most commonly aected body region among CrossFit
practitioners was the shoulders, predominantly in males
and with previous injuries, often obtained in other
modalities. In addition, CrossFit can be safely practiced
by individuals aged 18-69.
Keywords | Exercise; High-Intensity Interval Training;
Wounds and Injuries; Review.
RESUMO | O CrossFit se apresenta como um novo método
de treinamento físico que vem ganhando popularidade
desde sua criação. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar
o perfil de lesões em praticantes de CrossFit por meio
de uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Utilizaram-se as
recomendações da Declaração PRISMA para condução
da revisão sistemática. A busca foi realizada nas bases
de dados CINAHL, SciELO, Science Direct, SCOPUS,
LILACS, PEDro, PubMed, SPORTDiscus e Web of Science.
Avaliou-se a qualidade metodológica dos estudos, entre
os quais dez foram considerados elegíveis. A prevalência
de lesões nos praticantes de CrossFit variou de 5 a
73,5%, e a taxa de lesão variou de 1,94 a 3,1 lesões a
cada 1.000 horas de treinamento. A região corporal mais
acometida por lesões nos estudos selecionados foram
os ombros, seguidos pelas costas e joelhos. Em relação
aos fatores associados às lesões, destacou-se o tipo de
exercício realizado e o tempo de prática de CrossFit. O
sexo apresentou associação com a prevalência de lesões:
estudos demonstraram que os homens apresentaram
maior número de lesões em relação às mulheres. A idade
esteve entre os fatores que não estiveram associados às
lesões. Conclui-se que os ombros são a região corporal
mais comumente acometida entre os praticantes de
CrossFit, em indivíduos do sexo masculino e com lesões
prévias, muitas vezes obtidas em outras modalidades.
Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):229-239
Constatou-se, ainda, que o CrossFit pode ser praticado com
segurança por indivíduos de 18 a 69 anos.
Descritores | Exercício; Treinamento Intervalado de Alta
Intensidade; Ferimentos e Lesões; Revisão.
RESUMEN | CrossFit es un nuevo método de entrenamiento
físico y ha ganado popularidad desde su creación. El objetivo
de este estudio fue analizar el perfil de lesiones en practicantes
de CrossFit a través de una revisión sistemática. La Declaración
PRISMA fue utilizada para la preparación de esta revisión. Se
realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las siguientes bases de
datos: CINAHL, SciELO, Science Direct, SCOPUS, LILACS, PEDro,
PubMed, SPORTDiscus y Web of Science. Se evaluó la calidad
metodológica de los estudios, entre los cuales diez estudios
fueron considerados elegibles. La prevalencia de lesiones en
los practicantes de CrossFit tuvo una variación del 5 al 73,5%,
y la tasa de lesiones de 1,94 a 3,1 lesiones a cada 1000 horas
de entrenamiento. La región corporal más lesionada fueran los
hombros, seguido por las espaldas y rodillas. En relación a los
factores asociados a las lesiones, se destacan el tipo de ejercicio
fue realizado y el tiempo de práctica del CrossFit. En relación
al género, los hombres presentaron más lesiones. La edad no
estuvo asociada a las lesiones. Se concluye que la región corporal
más comúnmente acometida entre los practicantes de CrossFit
fueron los hombros, en individuos masculinos y con lesiones
previas, muchas veces obtenidas en otras modalidades. Además,
el CrossFit puede ser practicado con seguridad por individuos de
18 a 69 años.
Palabras clave | Ejercicio; Entrenamiento de Intervalos de Alta
Intensidad; Heridas y Lesiones; Revisión.
It is noteworthy that there is a fairly recent interest
of researchers and the general public in physical
activities in which high intensity is prevalent1. Studies
show that high intensity training provides more
benets to physical tness and health while having
shorter duration, when compared to traditional
training methods1,2.
us, CrossFit presents itself as a new method of
physical training that has gained popularity since its
creation and implementation at the beginning of the
new millennium3. It aims to promote physical tness
through the development of components such as aerobic
capacity, muscular strength and endurance, speed,
coordination, agility and balance4, through sports and
functional exercises, comprising weightlifting exercises,
gymnastic and aerobic conditioning movements, which
can be executed at high intensity5.
In the world, there are about 12,000 certied and
registered tness centers and gyms that oer CrossFit3;
of these, approximately 440 are in Brazil, involving
approximately 40,000 practitioners and athletes6.
Research shows a signicant growth in the number of
practitioners of this modality in various populations,
such as healthy or obese individuals and athletes, due
to its challenging and motivational nature7-9. Evidence
shows that about 5% of CrossFit practitioners present
a dependency relationship, which is signicantly
associated with the incidence/frequency of injuries4.
e American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
suggests potential benets of CrossFit, but also
highlights signicant injury risks in extreme
conditioning programs like the aforementioned10.
ese programs involve the execution of some exercises
that, if performed incorrectly or excessively, can cause
musculoskeletal injuries, ligament injuries, and even
rhabdomyolysis10. In this way, concerns over the
potential injury risk associated with the intense and
repetitive nature of CrossFit and the necessary technical
requirements for performing the exercises safely have
grown in academia and in the practice of modality11.
Gathering information from studies available in the
literature on injuries of CrossFit practitioners allows us
to get to know data related to the prevalence and rates
of injury by hours of training, most commonly injured
body regions, and injury-related factors, aiming to
develop and implement preventive actions in its practice,
considering the increase of the number of practitioners
and, consequently, of environments that allow for the
practice of CrossFit. In addition, a systematic review
with analysis of these aspects for clinical decision
making in the elds of medicine and physical therapy
is valuable. Since the currently published reviews on
CrossFit injuries12,13 were limited to investigating the
injury rate by comparing it with other types of physical
exercises and sports, no studies were found addressing
the various aspects these injuries have, such as rate and
prevalence, commonly aected body regions and related
factors, hence resulting in an injury prole14,15. us, the
Dominski et al. Injuries in CrossFit practitioners
objective of this study was to analyze the injury prole of
CrossFit practitioners through a systematic review of the
is is a systematic review of the literature
following the recommended criteria of the PRISMA
Statement–Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses16.
Search Strategy
Representing a signicant part of global scientic
production, the search for studies was performed on the
electronic databases related to Sport and Physical Exercise
Sciences, and Physical erapy: CINAHL via EBSCO,
SciELO (Scientic Electronic Library Online), Science
Direct, SCOPUS (Elsevier), LILACS(Literatura Latino-
Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), PEDro
(Physiotherapy Evidence Database), PubMed(National
Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health),
SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, and Web of Science
Coleção Principal (omson Reuters Scientic).
e search took place in May 2017 and ended
on 11 May of the same year. In order to include all
production conducted on the topic in the databases
selected, and because of the recent creation and
development of CrossFit, the only term used for article
search was “Crosst”, in the same way the study by
Meyer et al.13 was conducted.
e search in the database Web of Science was
performed in Core Collection, the basic search eld
with the term “Crosst”, the item Topic selected and
Timespan set as all years.
Only original articles about injuries with athletes
and practitioners of CrossFit were considered, including
studies with quantitative, qualitative or mixed approach,
with summaries and texts available in full online until
11 May 2017. No time limit was set. Review articles,
case studies, conference abstracts, editorials and letters
were excluded.
Eligibility of the studies occurred by means of the
PICOS criteria and are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1. Criteria for inclusion and exclusion of the studies selected
for review
Inclusion Exclusion
PParticipate Any individual
practitioner of CrossFit
Individuals practicing
other forms of physical
IIntervention CrossFit
Massages, manual
therapy, stretching,
alternative therapies,
weight training,
hiking or running,
High Intensity Interval
Training (HIIT)
With healthy
individuals or not,
with groups of other
physical exercises, or
Control Group without
OOutcome Injuries, trauma
Randomized and non-
randomized controlled
Case studies, review,
review with
Selection of studies and data extraction
e studies were selected by three reviewers
(FHD, TCS, TTS), independently. Initially, analysis
of the article titles identied through the search
strategy was conducted, followed by examination of
the abstracts. Subsequently, analysis of the full text
of the articles selected in the previous steps was
performed. Disagreements between reviewers were
resolved by consensus.
For determining injury prole in CrossFit,
data analysis was conducted while considering the
following categories: prevalence and type of injury,
body region aected by injury, injury rate by training
time and whether factors were related to injuries or
Assessment of the methodological quality of the
In order to assess the methodological quality
of the studies, the recommendations of STROBE
(Strengthening the Reporting of Observational
Studies in Epidemiology) were followed, by means
of the STROBE Statement – Checklist of items
that should be included in reports of cross-sectional
studies17,18. is checklist has 22 items that received
a score from 0 (does not meet) to 1 (meets), the
total score was obtained from the sum of the item
Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):229-239
scores and, according to the nal score of the study,
a classication in accordance with Mataratzis et al.19
was dened: a) when the study met more than 80%
of the criteria as established by STROBE, indicating
better quality of studies; b) – when 50% to 80% of
STROBE criteria were met; and c) when less than
50% of the criteria were met.
e search resulted in 684 entries. After duplicate
exclusion (n=75) and title reading, 100 articles were
selected for the abstract. In this step, other 79 were
excluded 79, with 21 left for full reading. Finally, 10
studies were part of the nal review (Figure 1).
Search Results (684)
Lilacs (2)
PEDro (2)
PubMED (69)
SciELO (0)
ScienceDirect (80)
SportDiscus (284)
Web of Science (68)
Studies after removal of duplicates (609)
Excluded by title (509)
Selected for abstract Reading (100)
Excluded by the abstract (79)
Selected for complete text reading (21)
Studies included after
reading the references
Studies excluded by reading whole article (13)
- Does not concern injury (4)
- Does not concern CrossFit (4)
- Other study types (3)
- Complete text unavailable (2)
Studies included for analysis (10)
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection process of the studies included
Dominski et al. Injuries in CrossFit practitioners
e sample size of the selected studies ranged from
34 to 1,393, totaling 3,307 research subjects, 2,244
being of male and 871 of female sex (192 subjects
did not have their sex reported). e subjects were
characterized as CrossFit practitioners in six studies,
athletes in three studies, and soldiers in one. e average
age of the research subjects ranged from 26.8 to 38.9
years, and the age group ranged from 18 to 69 years.
e prevalence of injuries in the studies ranged
from 5 to 73.5%. e rate of injuries every 1,000
hours of CrossFit training ranged from 1.94 to 3.1
injuries (Chart 1).
Chart 1. CrossFit injuries: Author, sample and main results related to injuries
Sample Results – Injuries
Sex Age
Population Prevalence
(n/%) Type of injury Injury rate (every 1,000
hours of training)
Men Women
Grier et al.20 1393 1248 145 26.8 Soldiers 5%
Hak et al. 21 132 93 39 32.3 Athletes 97 (73.5%) 3.10 injuries
Weisenthal et al.22 386 231 150 18 to
69 Practitioners 75 (19.4%) Inflammation, sprain and
Chachula, Cameron, Svoboda23 54 40 14 17 to
50 Practitioners 24 (44%) Joints
Huynh et al.24 34 25 9 35.5 Practitioners 12 (35%) Rhabdomyolysis
Sprey et al. 6566 323 243 31.4 Practitioners 176 (31%)
Summitt et al.25 187 Practitioners 44 (23.7%) 1.94 injuries
Aune, Powers26 247 139 108 38.9 Athletes 85 (34%) 2.71 injuries
Montalvo et al.27 191 94 97 31 Athletes 50
(26.17%) More acute than chronic 2.3 injuries
Moran et al.3117 51 66 35 Practitioners Acute and of Gradual start 2.10 injuries
Caption: (–): Not reported
Figure 2. Body regions aected by injuries in studies on CrossFit (number of studies per regions)
Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):229-239
e body region most aected by injuries in the
studies selected were the shoulders (7 studies). Back
and knees were injured regions in practitioners of
4 studies each, followed by the lumbar region in 3
studies, and arms/elbows in 2 studies. Body regions
like head/neck, wrists, thighs, legs and feet were cited
as injured regions in one study (Figure 2).
Several injury-related factors were observed
in CrossFit practitioners and athletes. e most
present factors within the studies were the type of
exercise performed, in 5 studies3,22-25, and the training
time of CrossFit, in 3 studies6,26,27. In addition, sex
presented relation to the prevalence of injuries,
where men presented a higher number of injuries in
relation to women, and the presence of prior injury
was associated with new injuries. In 5 studies, age
was among the factors not associated with injuries
Chart 2. Results of studies on CrossFit in relation to factors associated and not associated with injuries
Author Factors associated
with injuries Results Factors not associated
with injuries
Grier et al.20
a) Sex and body
mass index
b) Smoking
a) Risk of injury greater for men with BMI classified as overweight or obese
b) Risk of injury greater in smokers compared to non-smokers.
Weisenthal et al.22
a) Sex
b) Type of exercise
c) Supervised by
a) Men presented more injuries than women (53 against 21)
b) The shoulder was more injured in gymnastic movements and the lumbar
was more injured in powerlifting movements
c) The rate of injury significantly decreased with the involvement of the
Age, participation time,
training session time,
training days per week
a) Prior injury
b) Type of exercise
a) Practitioners with prior injury are 3.75 times more likely to suer an injury
related to CrossFit
b) Participants realize that exercises like deadlift and kettlebell swing
aggravate lumbar injuries, jumps intensify knee pain, and pain in the shoulders
and elbow are accentuated due to ring dips
CrossFit experience
Participation in classes
with professional
Sprey et al.6a) Training time a) Practitioners of CrossFit since 6 months (35%) showed higher injury rate,
with 70% compared to practitioners with less training time Sex and age group
Summitt et al.25 a) Type of exercise a) Practitioners considered gymnastic exercises as the main cause of injury
(25 of 46 total injuries).
Age, number of resting
Aune and Powers26
a) Training time
b) Type of exercise
c) Equipment type
d) Prior Injury
b) Excessive eort
and inadequate
a) The incidence rate of injury among athletes with less than 6 months of
experience was 2.5 times higher than that of athletes with more than 6
months of experience
b) Squat cleans, ring dips, overhead squats and push presses were more likely
to cause injury
c) Exercises performed with bars resulted in more injuries
d) Athletes with prior shoulder injury are 8.1 times more likely to injure the
shoulder compared to athletes with healthy shoulders
e) Athletes reported that 35% of injuries occurred due to overexertion and
20% due to improper technique in the execution of the exercises
Montalvo et al.27
a) Participation and
training time
b) Physical activity
aside from CrossFit
c) Stature
a) The injured athletes presented more participation time (in years) and
weekly time of CrossFit practice compared to non injured
b) Athletes with physical activity practice aside from CrossFit were 2.3 more
likely to injure themselves
c) Injured athletes presented greater stature compared to non-injured
Age, sex, size of CrossFit
class, number of trainers,
years of structured
physical activity,
and participation in
Moran et al.3a) Sex
b) Type of exercise
a) Highest rate of injury found in men who had injury in last 6 months
b) Weightlifting exercises were the most cited as cause of injury: squat,
deadlift, overhead press and Snatch.
Caption: (–): Not reported
Dominski et al. Injuries in CrossFit practitioners
Regarding to the assessment of methodological
quality according to the criteria of STROBE, adherence
to the criteria varied between 50% and 81.8%, the
majority of studies being classied as B and only one
study classied as A, having above 80% of the criteria
met (Table 2).
Table 2. Assessment of methodological quality of the studies included
STROBE criteria Title and
Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Other
Total Score
(%) Classification
Grier20 0/1 1/2 4/9 4/5 3/4 0/1 12 (54.5%) B
Hak et al.21 1/1 1/2 4/9 5/5 4/4 0/1 15 (68.1) B
Weisenthal et al.22 1/1 2/2 7/9 4/5 4 /4 0/1 18 (81.8) A
Chachula, Cameron, Svoboda23 0/1 2/2 6/9 3.5/5 4/4 0/1 15.5 (70.4) B
Huynh et al.24 1/1 1/2 3/9 3/5 3/4 0/1 11(50) B
Sprey et al.61/1 2/2 6/9 4/5 4 /4 0/1 17 (77.2) B
Summitt et al.25 1/1 1/2 3/9 3/5 3/4 0/1 11 (50) B
Aune, Powers26 1/1 1.5/2 6.5/9 4.5/5 2/4 0/1 15.5 (70.4) B
Montalvo et al.27 0/1 2/2 6/9 4/5 3/4 0/1 13 (59) B
Moran et al.30/1 1/2 8/9 2/5 3/4 0/1 14 (63.6) B
is study aimed to analyze the injury prole of
CrossFit practitioners through a systematic review
of the literature. For determining injury prole in
CrossFit, data such as prevalence and type of injury,
body region aected, injury rate by training time, and
whether factors were related to injuries or not like sex,
age and type of exercise were analyzed and will be
further discussed in the following sections.
Injury prevalence
e prevalence of injuries was distributed unevenly
among studies, which can be explained by the large
amplitude in sample sizes, aside from dierences
between the populations analyzed and training
Although one of the studies showed high prevalence
of injuries with 73.5%21, this one was conducted
through questionnaire available in online forums, which
is a methodological limitation, as it is not known how
many individuals have seen the research and opted
not to respond. In addition, Hak et al.21 conducted the
study with practitioners of all CrossFit participation
levels; on the other hand, the prior training experience,
that is, the previous practice of the participants of the
research by Weisenthal et al.22 and Grier et al.20 may
have contributed to the lower prevalence of injuries
when compared to the study by Hak et al.21, but this
relationship is not clear in the literature yet.
Injury rate
When compared to other modalities of physical
exercise or sport, the injury rate of CrossFit is not
considered high. A rate of 3.1 injuries every 1,000 hours
of training as a maximum value found in the studies
was observed21. In sports, rates from 2.3 to 33 injuries
in running, 2.5 in handball, 5.4 in triathlon, 5.45 in
gymnastics, 9.6 in soccer and 26.7 in rugby, every 1,000
hours of training, were found28-33.
It is inferred that this result may occur due to the
absence of determinants such as physical contact and
practice of exercise on irregular soils, which were already
shown to be associated with injuries in sports34-36.
Associated factors
A higher injury rate was observed in males, a
result that may be related to the lower demand of
men for trainers compared to women with the aim
of being supervised. Evidence shows that women
consult their trainers for doubts and supervision more
when compared to men22. Publications on injuries
comparing men and women have also shown a higher
prevalence in males, in sports such as basketball, judo
and running37-39.
Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):229-239
Several populations have sought to practice CrossFit,
many already practicing other forms of physical exercise
or sport and, in some cases, this population is composed of
people with prior injuries. It was observed that this is an
important related factor, because individuals with previous
injuries are 3.75 times more likely to acquire them again in
CrossFit23, specically with regard to the shoulder, where it
was shown that athletes with prior injury are eight times
more likely to injure the shoulder compared to athletes
with healthy shoulders26. erefore, the need for attention
to the anamnesis of new practitioners in sites that oer
CrossFit practice is highlighted, in order to know prior
injuries and prevent the recurrence of these injuries.
e association between injury and training time
was shown to be not clear, as some studies have shown
that practitioners with longer training time suer more
injuries in relation to those with less time6,27. On the
other hand, a study found an incidence rate of injury
among athletes with less than six months of experience
to be 2.5 times greater than that of athletes with more
than six months of experience, which can be explained
by the lack of execution of the correct movements
technique26. Despite the training time and weekly
frequency being associated with greater experience in
the exercises, there is the increase in exposure of the
practitioner to repetitive movement, which increases
the chances of injury27. Furthermore, one of the features
present in the practice inside CrossFit gyms is the
establishment of personal records, especially in exercises
related to weightlifting, in which the individual seeks to
execute the movement with the greatest possible load.
is encourages practitioners to raise the load as they
increase their practice time, aiming to improve their
records, but also increasing the risk of injury. Hak et
al.21 suggest a focus on the proper execution technique,
being a more important feature than speed and number
of repetitions performed.
e fact that most studies found no association between
the presence of injuries and age/age group reinforces what
is proposed by Weisenthal et al.22, who claim that CrossFit
is a tness training program that can be practiced safely by
individuals of a wide age range – from 18 to 69 years, but
only if carried out in a safe environment.
Body regions aected and type of exercise
e shoulder was the joint most aected by injuries
due to CrossFit training. According to studies, this
result is related to the execution of some exercises that
have been considered harmful – such as overhead squat,
push press, kettlebell swing and snatch26 – because they
have a high range of motion of the shoulder complex, a
characteristic that can increase the risk of injury, since
movements above the shoulder joint lead to injury due
to the reduction of the subacromial space40.
e study by Weisenthal et al.22 showed that, for the
olympic gymnastics movements present in the modality,
there was signicant dierence between the body
regions that suered injury, the shoulder being the most
injured, corresponding to more than 41% of shoulder
injuries in the practitioners analyzed. e cause of this
type of injury is usually associated with a decrease in
the stabilization of the scapulothoracic joint. Scapular
dyskinesia aects the excursion movement of this joint,
overloading the glenohumeral joint41,42, which is usually
associated to muscle imbalance, mainly due to weakness
of the serratus anterior and lower trapezius bers43,44.
e study by Summit et al.25 showed that, among the
gymnastic movements that cause injury (25 out of 46)
reported by practitioners, there are kipping pull-up, ring
muscle-up, push-up and ring dips
In addition to the exercises derived from gymnastics,
the exercises specic to olympic weightlifting that
constitutes CrossFit, like overhead squat, require
the placement of the shoulder joint in positions of
extreme exion, abduction and internal rotation, which
increase the risk of injury45. Due to the high incidence
of shoulder injuries found in the studies, greater
caution is suggested regarding gymnastic exercises
and olympic weightlifting on the part of practitioners
and professionals who supervise the execution of these
movements, with a focus on factors such as overexertion
and improper technique, factors reported by athletes to
cause injuries in 35 and 20% of cases, respectively26.
Previously cited in the literature as a risk during the
practice of CrossFit10, cases of rhabdomyolysis were
reported in one related study24. According to Hak et al.21,
this may have occurred due to the inclusion of practitioners
of various tness levels, where rhabdomyolysis is to be
expected in those who exercise in extremely high levels
of intensity. Rhabdomyolysis is a condition not exclusive
of CrossFit, since other sports, if performed strenuously,
can also cause it. It usually occurs due to poor exercise
prescription or execution without adequate supervision46,
factor of which is also associated with injuries in
CrossFit, as veried in the study by Weisenthal et al.22,
where the injury rate was signicantly decreased with the
involvement of the instructor.
Dominski et al. Injuries in CrossFit practitioners
Lack of proper supervision and/or bad training
prescription can result in training components like volume
and inadequate load for the practitioner47, especially when
it comes to extreme conditioning program. is way, the
trainer must possess knowledge of the peak load of each
athlete in order to prevent injuries. Halson48 suggests
some variables that can be assessed to monitor the
training load. Variables such as frequency, time, training
intensity, eort, repetitions, volume, perceived exertion or
fatigue, technical analysis, among others, must be taken
into consideration. e monitoring of these variables is
important to prevent injuries, since performance should
not be the only way to verify whether training load is
suitable or not for the athlete48.
e epidemiological condition of injuries in some
sports and physical exercise modalities still has gaps,
lacking further investigation49. In this case, CrossFit
stands out, as it is a type of new physical training that has
shown signicant growth in recent years. Consequently,
the scientic literature on injuries in this modality is
also novel, so it is suggested that be performed research
on injuries analyzing practitioners and athletes after
exposure to CrossFit in the long term in future studies,
featuring prospective longitudinal studies, with better
methodological conditions and specic instruments.
All selected studies in the review met 50% or more
of the criteria dened by STROBE. Most of items not
met were related to the description of the methods,
particularly with respect to bias, sample size and
treatment of quantitative variables. Aside from that,
no studies reported other information such as funding.
Such ndings suggest the need for more detail in the
description present in the Methods section in future
studies, for better methodological quality.
e selected studies present limitations, as they
investigated the injuries of practitioners through
self-report, so the accuracy of some answers may have
been impaired, demonstrating the need for the use or
development and validation of specic instruments for
analyzing this population. In addition, most studies were
characterized as retrospective, that is, based on past data,
and few studies addressed the issue of the treatment used
for injuries, which can be a subject of future research.
Clinical implications
e extrapolation of the ndings of this study enables
professionals involved with CrossFit practitioners to
identify risk factors associated with injuries, in order to
act preemptively against them. Knowing the population,
most aected body regions and providing proper
supervision in the practice of the modality allows the
practitioner to be oriented correctly, minimizing the
risk of injury. Knowing that population is important
for the execution of physical and functional evaluations
with the modality practitioner. is can be done, for
example, with assessments on the factors mobility,
balance and neuromuscular control by tests such as Y
balance and step down50,51. Poor performance in those
tests shows the need for greater caution for these
CrossFit classes with little supervision and/or with
a high number of practitioners should also be avoided,
as the professional control over movements performed
incorrectly becomes more dicult. In addition, the
work leading up to the workout of the day (WOD),
such as warm ups and activities for developing a specic
skill must be performed.
It is concluded that the shoulders are the most
commonly aected body region, followed by the back
and knees, according to the studies analyzed. e
injuries were reported more frequently in males and with
previous injuries, often obtained in other modalities. In
most studies, it was not possible to observe relations
between age and the presence of injuries, characterizing
CrossFit as a physical training program that can be
practiced safely by individuals from 18 to 69 years.
1. Gillen JB, Gibala MJ. Is high-intensity interval training a
time-ecient exercise strategy to improve health and
fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013;39(3):409-12. doi:
2. Skelly LE, Andrews PC, Gillen JB, Martin BJ, Percival ME,
Gibala MJ. High-intensity interval exercise induces 24-h
energy expenditure similar to traditional endurance exercise
despite reduced time commitment. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab.
2014;39(7):845-8. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0562.
3. Moran S, Booker H, Staines J, Williams S. Rates and risk
factors of injury in CrossFit: a prospective cohort study. J
Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(9):1147-53. doi: 10.23736/
4. Lichtenstein MB, Jensen TT. Exercise addiction in CrossFit:
Prevalence and psychometric properties of the Exercise
Addiction Inventory. Addict Behav Rep. 2016;3:33-7. doi:
Fisioter Pesqui. 2018;25(2):229-239
5. Tibana RA, de Farias DL, Nascimento D, Da Silva-
Grigoletto ME, Prestes J. Relação da força muscular com o
desempenho no levantamento olímpico em praticantes de
CrossFit®. Rev Andal Med Deporte 2018;11:84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.
6. Sprey JW, Ferreira T, Lima MV, Duarte Jr A, Jorge PB,
Santili C. An epidemiological profile of CrossFit athletes in
Brazil. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(8):2325967116663706.
doi: 10.1177/2325967116663706
7. Heinrich KM, Patel PM, O’Neal JL, Heinrich BS. High-
intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for
exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an
intervention study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):789. doi:
8. Fisher J, Sales A, Carlson L, Steele J. A comparison of the
motivational factors between CrossFit participants and other
resistance exercise modalities: a pilot study. J Sports Med
Phys Fitness. 2016. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06434-3
9. Sibley BA, Bergman SM. What keeps athletes in the gym?
Goals, psychological needs, and motivation of CrossFit™
participants. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2017:1-20. doi:
10. Bergeron MF, Nindl BC, Deuster PA, Baumgartner N, Kane
SF, Kraemer WJ, et al. Consortium for Health and Military
Performance and American College of Sports Medicine
consensus paper on extreme conditioning programs in
military personnel. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10(6):383-9.
doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e318237bf8a
11. Eather N, Morgan PJ, Lubans DR. Improving health-related
fitness in adolescents: the CrossFit teens™ randomised
controlled trial. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(3):209-23. doi:
12. Klimek C, Ashbeck C, Brook AJ, Durall C. Are injuries
more common with CrossFit training than other forms of
exercise?JSportRehabil. 2017;1-17. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0040
13. Meyer J, Morrison J, Zuniga J. The benefits and risks of
CrossFit: a systematic review. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;
65(12):612-618. doi: 10.1177/2165079916685568
14. Crivellaro J, Almeida RMVRD, Wenke R, Neves EB. Perfil
de lesões em pilotos de parapente no Brasil e seus fatores
de risco. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2017;23(4):270-3. doi:
15. Hammami N, Hattabi S, Salhi A, Rezgui T, Oueslati M,
Bouassida A. Combat sport injuries profile: a review. Sci
Sports. 2017;33(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2017.04.014
16. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew
M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review
and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
Systematic Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
17. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC,
Mulrow CD, Pocock, SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of
observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation
and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35. doi:
18. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC,
Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting
of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)
statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.Int
J Surgery,12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
19. Mataratzis PSR, Accioly E, Padilha PC. Deficiências
de micronutrientes em crianças e adolescentes com
anemia falciforme: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras
Hematol Hemoter. 2010;32(3):247-256. doi: 10.1590/
20. Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, McNulty V, Jones BH. Extreme
conditioning programs and injury risk in a US Army Brigade
Combat Team. US Army Med Dep J. 2013:36-47.
21. Hak PT, Hodzovic E, Hickey B. The nature and prevalence of
injury during CrossFit training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000318
22. Weisenthal BM, Beck CA, Maloney MD, DeHaven KE,
Giordano BD. Injury rate and patterns among CrossFit
athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(4):2325967114531177.
doi: 10.1177/2325967114531177
23. Chachula LA, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ. Association of
prior injury with the report of new injuries sustained during
CrossFit training. Athletic Training Sports Health Care.
2016;8(1):28-34. doi:10.3928/19425864-20151119-02
24. Huynh A, Leong KE, Jones N, Crump N, Russell D, Anderson M,
et al. Outcomes of exertional rhabdomyolysis following high-
intensity resistance training. Int Med J. 2016;46(5):602-8. doi:
25. Summitt RJ, Cotton RA, Kays AC, Slaven EJ. Shoulder injuries
in individuals who participate in CrossFit training. Sports
Health. 2016;8(6):541-6. doi: 10.1177/1941738116666073
26. Aune KT, Powers JM. Injuries in an extreme conditioning
program. Sports Health. 2017;9(1):52-8. doi:
27. Montalvo AM, Shaefer H, Rodriguez B, Li T, Epnere K, Myer
GD. Retrospective injury epidemiology and risk factors for
injury in CrossFit. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16(1):53.
28. Korkia P, Tunstall-Pedoe D, Maulli N. An epidemiological
investigation of training and injury patterns in British
triathletes. Br J Sports Med. 1994;28(3):191-6.
29. Seil R, Rupp S, Tempelhof S, Kohn D. Sports injuries in team
handball A one-year prospective study of sixteen men’s
senior teams of a superior nonprofessional level. Am J Sports
Med. 1998;26(5):681-7. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260051401
30. Kolt GS, Kirkby RJ. Epidemiology of injury in elite and
subelite female gymnasts: a comparison of retrospective and
prospective findings. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33(5):312-8.
31. van Beijsterveldt AM, van de Port IG, Krist MR, Schmikli SL,
Stubbe JH, Frederiks JE, et al. Eectiveness of an injury
prevention programme for adult male amateur soccer
players: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports
Med. 2012;1-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091277
32. Freitag A, Kirkwood G, Scharer S, Ofori-Asenso R, Pollock
AM. Systematic review of rugby injuries in children and
adolescents under 21 years. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):511-
9. doi: /10.1136/bjsports-2014-093684
33. Videbaek S, Bueno AM, Nielsen RO, Rasmussen S. Incidence
of running-related injuries per 1000 h of running in
dierent types of runners: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(7):1017-26. doi: 10.1007/
34. Woods C, Hawkins R, Hulse M, Hodson A. The Football
Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of
injuries in professional football: an analysis of ankle sprains.
Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(3):233-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.3.233
Dominski et al. Injuries in CrossFit practitioners
35. Kofotolis ND, Kellis E, Vlachopoulos SP. Ankle sprain
injuries and risk factors in amateur soccer players during a
2-year period. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):458-66. doi:
36. Bahr R, Karlsen R, Lian O, Ovrebo RV. Incidence and
mechanisms of acute ankle inversion injuries in volleyball: a
retrospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 1994;22(5):595-
600. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200505
37. Almeida Neto AFD, Tonin JP, Navega MT. Characterization of
sport injuries in the basketball. Fisioter Mov. 2013;26(2):361-8.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-51502013000200013
38. Hino AAF, Reis RS, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Fermino RC.
Prevalência de lesões em corredores de rua e fatores
associados. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2009;15(1):36-9. doi:
39. Manzato ALG, Camargo HP, Graças D, Martinez PF,
Oliveira Júnior SA. Lesões musculoesqueléticas em
praticantes de judô. Fisioter Pesqui. 24(2):127-34.
40. Wang H, Cochrane T. Mobility impairment, muscle imbalance,
muscle weakness, scapular asymmetry and shoulder injury
in elite volleyball athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness.
41. Kibler BW, McMullen J. Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to
shoulder pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):142-51.
42. Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K,
Sciascia AD, et al. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis
in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the
‘Scapular Summit’. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:877-885. doi:
43. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The disabled throwing
shoulder: spectrum of pathology part II: evaluation and
treatment of SLAP lesions in throwers. Arthroscopy.
2003;19(5):531-9. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50139
44. Ludewig PM, Phadke V, Braman JP, Hassett DR, Cieminski
CJ, LaPrade RF. Motion of the shoulder complex during
multiplanar humeral elevation. J Bone Joint Surg.
2009;91(2):378-89. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01483.
45. Gross ML, Brenner SL, Esformes I, Sonzogni JJ. Anterior
shoulder instability in weight lifters. Am J Sports Med.
1993;21(4):599-603. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100419
46. Rawson ES, Clarkson PM, Tarnopolsky MA. Perspectives
on Exertional Rhabdomyolysis. Sports Med. 2017:1-17. doi:
47. Drew MK, Finch CF. The relationship between training load
and injury, illness and soreness: a systematic and literature
review. Sports Med. 2016;46(6):861-83. doi: 10.1007/
48. Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue
in athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44(2):139-47. doi: 10.1007/
49. Butragueño J, Benito PJ, Maulli N. Injuries in strength
training: review and practical application. Eur J Sport Sci.
50. Bolt D, Giger R, Wirth S, Swanenburg J. Step Down Test-
Assessment of postural stability in patients with chronic
ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;1-13. doi: 10.1123/
51. Coughlan G, Fullam K., Delahunt E, Gissane C, Caulfield B. A
comparison between performance on selected directions of
the star excursion balance test and the y balance test. J Athl
Train. 2012;366-71. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.03
... There has been a trend in recent studies to carry out research on psychological factors in sports [10] with respect to the effects of physical exercise on health [11] and the influence of psychological aspects on athletes' performance [12]. However, review studies on CrossFit [2,13] have mainly focused on the effects of CrossFit on components of physical fitness focusing on the five domains of physical fitness (cardiovascular/respiratory resistance, endurance, strength, flexibility and power) and on possible injuries in CrossFit participants [14,15]. In addition to improving the physical conditioning of practitioners, the recent expansion of CrossFit may be associated with psychological variables of participants, such as motivation, which leads people to adhere to and maintain exercise [16]. ...
... Gathering information on the motivation and psychological needs of participants can contribute to the understanding of growth and interest in CrossFit, their influence on adherence to and maintenance of physical exercise practice [21], and psychological aspects related to recreational performance, athlete performance [22], and injury [15]. ...
... The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) recommendations [33] were used to evaluate the qualitative studies. This scale has 21 items, and each study was given a score from 0 to 21 and was coded as being of low (score of 0-7), medium (score of [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], or high quality (score of [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. ...
Full-text available
Objective This study aimed to review the existing literature concerning the psychological variables of CrossFit participants.MethodologyThis review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was documented in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42018091177). Six electronic databases (SCOPUS, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were searched from their inception through July 2020. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed.ResultsThirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. We observed an increase in satisfaction, clinical addiction, and enjoyment among participants related to exercise, social improvement, and high intrinsic motivation to participate for the purpose of enjoyment, challenge, and affiliation. Perceptions of effort were high among CrossFit participants. Some studies found that the reaction time was impaired after the CrossFit session, whereas others found no changes in mental health, self-esteem, and well-being after training.Conclusion Adherence and maintenance of the practice of CrossFit are related to psychological variables such as motivation and satisfaction of basic psychological needs. CrossFit participants demonstrated high perception of effort, intrinsic motivation, and reasons for practice such as enjoyment, challenge, and affiliation. The quality assessment demonstrated the need for more detail in the methods section of future investigations. Additional high-quality studies are needed to investigate the effects of CrossFit training on the mental health of participants.
... The analysis of injury patterns constitutes a fundamental part of this process, allowing athletes, coaches, and health-care professionals a better knowledge about the inappropriate habits that harm physical integrity and how to heal it. There are some reviews in the literature on injuries in CrossFit ® [3,[9][10][11][12], but ours is the only systematic review focused exclusively on injuries that have included all the studies published on this topic to date. Consequently, the purpose of this systematic review was to collect and summarize the characteristics of CrossFit ® -related injuries, including epidemiology, location, type of injury, and risk factors. ...
... Tibana et al. [10] performed a narrative review about injuries in participants of extreme conditioning programs, being not exclusive of CrossFit ® practitioners. The systematic review by Dominski et al. [12] is the most similar in design to ours, but we have appreciated that they finished the search in 2017, and only seven of the twenty-five studies encompassed in our systematic review were analyzed. In this regard, several studies have been published in 2020 [16,19,20,26,27,30,32,39]. Our systematic review also differs from those of Claudino et al. [11] and Klimek et al. [9], which have included a very small number of studies (six and three, respectively), so our review offers a more representative perspective of the whole literature on the topic. ...
Objective To review the characteristics of the injuries among CrossFit® practitioners, including prevalence and incidence, nature, location and risk factors. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception through August 2020, and English-language articles reporting on CrossFit®-related injuries were included. Data including sample (sex, age and demographics) and injuries’ characteristics (prevalence, incidence rate, nature, location, percentage of injuries requiring surgery andrisk factors) were extracted. Results Overall, twenty-five studies involving a total of 12,079 CrossFit® practitioners met the inclusion criteria. The mean prevalence of injuries among the included studies was 35.3%, with an incidence rate varying between 0.2 and 18.9 per 1000 hours of training. The most injured areas were shoulder (26%), spine (24%) and knee (18%). Among the studies that reported the injuries requiring surgery, the mean percentage was 8.7%. Regarding the risk factors associated with injuries, older age, male sex, a greater body mass index, the existence of previous injuries, the lack of coach supervision, the experience on CrossFit® and the participation in competitions were reported by the studies. Conclusions CrossFit® training has an injury incidence rate similar to weightlifting and powerlifting. Findings from the studies suggest that the most affected areas are shoulder, spine and knee. The limited quality of the studies prevents us from draw solid conclusions about injury risk factors. Level of Evidence of the Included Studies III
... Literature Search: The literature search was conducted in accordance with the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guideline. 14 In each database, the title, abstract or keywords were used, combined with the word "CrossFit" only, this fact was used because of CrossFit is a recent method, and the literature about related topics is still scarce, as used by Meyer et al. e Dominski et al. 15,16 . After conducting the initial search, the references list of the articles retrieved were screened for any additional articles that had relevance. ...
... Dominski et al. 16 evaluate injury in CrossFit practitioners (overall) and evaluate the selected studies also using STROBE. 10 studies were included and nine studies were classified with "B" and only 1 with "A" score. ...
Full-text available
Objective: Sports injury can occur due to several factors, which makes it extremely difficult to conduct cause and effect studies by controlling and evaluating a specific variable. Common reason for the appearance of injuries is poor physical preparation for the proposed training load, a factor that is more present in high intensity sports. CrossFit has been gaining a great deal of attention in recent years due to its dynamic mix of varied sports. Beginner and intermediary level participants are very common in CrossFit gyms, so the understanding the training effect for this group is very important for healthy practice (aiming for safety and injury rate). Methods: Only original articles were included, between 2000 and 2019 (November), with the search for the word "CrossFit" in nine databases. It was accepted only studies in Portuguese, English or Spanish. Results: After screening, only three studies met the inclusion criteria following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses assessment. The most common injury segments in beginner and intermediate practitioners were the shoulder and the knee. There are functional and morphological mechanisms that makes injury become more common, such as life habits and anatomic / physiological body disposition. Conclusion: CrossFit beginners and intermediaries participants demonstrated moderate injury level. Studies with more subjects showed a lower injury level. The most injured segments found were knee and shoulder. According to our results the risk of injury in CrossFit beginner and intermediary participants is acceptable, and discussed in recent published reviews.
... 5 Hopkins et al. also express concern about an increase in the incidence of injuries caused by the growth of CrossFit participation; however, most of the literature indicates that the prevalence and incidence of injuries in CrossFit practitioners are similar to those associated with several other sports and exercise modalities. 3,5,[13][14][15] Moreover, the authors presented an average injury rate of about 19%, based on data from a reference that is no longer available ( What CrossFit doesn't want you to know, 2013); these data relativizes the authors' conclusion regarding injuries in general. ...
... What CrossFit doesn't want you to know, 2013); these data relativizes the authors' conclusion regarding injuries in general. In our systematic review 14 ...
... 49 Dominski ve ark., yaptıkları bir inceleme araştırmasında, CrossFit uygulayıcılarındaki yaralanmaların yaygınlığı %5,0-73,5 arasında değişmekte olduğunu ve 1.000 antrenman saati başına toplam yaralanma etki oranı 1,94-3,10 arasında değişiklik gösterdiğini rapor etmiştir. 50 Aynı çalışmada, en çok yaralanan bölgeler sırasıyla omuz, sırt ve diz bölgesi olduğu belirtilmiştir. Ayrıca ilişkili faktörler göz önüne alındığında, hareketin türü ve CrossFit antrenmanının süresiyle yaralanmalar arasında bir ilişki olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. ...
... one of the most frequently studied topics seen in our review was the prevalence and incidence of injuries related to HIFt. A total of 14 studies either reported collected data to calculate prevalence and incidence rates or reviewed the available literature related to HIFt and injuries [31,32,40,54,69,74,86,87,91,93,94,107,109,116]. In addition, several more case studies exist describing injuries occurring within this training modality, which are not included here as they did not meet the inclusion criteria for this study. ...
Full-text available
Purpose. As a form of high-intensity functional training (HIFt), crossFit training has grown in popularity over the last decade. the aim of this analysis is to provide researchers with a tool to further guide scientific inquiry in this area of research. Methods. Even though systematic reviews and meta-analyses are preferred when analysing and synthesizing large numbers of scientific studies, the current literature on crossFit training is scarce. therefore, we used a content analysis approach to (1) review the literature on the topic; (2) synthesize the available research and examine the most popular issues, trends, and methodologies used; and (3) present an overall state of the literature and propose potential directions for future research. Results. A total of 104 studies related to HIFt and crossFit training were identified. these were published between 2007 and 2018 in 15 different countries, in 69 journals. the analysis referred to 6 main themes: (1) publication year, (2) country of research, (3) the peer-review journals publishing this type of research, (4) topical areas primarily studied, (5) research design, and (6) characteristics of individuals involved in this training modality. Conclusions. to our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a content analysis of the available literature on HIFt and crossFit training. the literature contributed significantly to the development of HIFt concepts, yet additional studies are needed to elucidate how HIFt/crossFit training may differ from more traditional training programs. Hopefully, our study will facilitate collaboration among scholars interested in HIFt modalities.
Background CrossFit is an activity that can provide positive influences on body composition and physical fitness. However, the occurrence or pattern of possible injuries, especially in the orofacial region, has not yet been studied. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and patterns of orofacial injuries in CrossFit practitioners. Material and Methods This was a cross‐sectional study carried out using an online questionnaire on the Google Forms platform. The volunteers were self‐selected men and women who practice CrossFit and reside in Brazilian municipalities. The online survey was conducted during April 2020 and comprised 12 questions. The data were analyzed, categorized, and presented as percentages. Results These were 65 (27.8%) participants who reported having suffered at least one trauma and they were more prevalent during training sessions 58 (89.2%). Among the regions with the highest frequency of injuries, the head 23 (21%), mental protuberance 22 (19.6%), upper lip 19 (16.9%), and maxillary teeth 14 (12.5%) were the most cited. Conclusions The prevalence of injuries in the head region indicates a potential concern. Preference should be given to making mouthguards for the maxillary teeth, as they are significantly more affected by trauma during CrossFit when compared to the mandibular teeth.
Full-text available
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the injury rates of individuals engaged in CrossFit training and examine the risk of injury associated with competition. Study design Cross-sectional analysis. Methods Descriptive statistics, including injury incidence and rates, were examined for individuals reporting participation in a CrossFit sanctioned competition between 2013 and 2017. To examine the odds of being injured, we considered logistic regression models, where the primary independent measure was participation length—individual measures of interest included age, sex, body mass index, CrossFit affiliation and competition status. Results 3049 individuals completed the survey (60% completion rate). All competitors, regardless of competition level, had similar incidence of injury (χ ² =1.1, p=0.571). For those who reported competing, our calculated injury rate was 0.21–0.54 injuries per 1000 training hours, while for those not competing, the injury rate was calculated as 0.39–1.30 injuries per 1000 training hours. Logistic regression demonstrated short length of participation in CrossFit training as the main factor associated with the odds of being injured (OR=1.82; 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.92). Additionally, training at an official CrossFit affiliate appeared to have a protective effect from injury (OR=0.85; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.10). Conclusion Our findings provide evidence of the low risk of injury related to these events. Moreover, these findings support the notion that musculoskeletal injuries may be the result of poor progression plans, which may be minimised by participating in an official CrossFit affiliate.
Full-text available
Introduction Considering the ongoing growth of CrossFit training, it is pertinent to examine the motivational characteristics of individuals who engage in this type of training modality. Purpose This study aimed to examine the motivational characteristics displayed by individuals participating in CrossFit training through a narrative review. Methods Four electronic databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched from their inception to June 2019, with search criteria including terms related to motivation and exercise. We selected only original articles that investigated motivation among CrossFit training participants. Results Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The individuals’ motivation was mainly characterized by more autonomous forms of extrinsic motivation (identified and integrate regulations). The role of extrinsic motives is explained by the possibility of improving physical abilities/skills, health-related factors and well-being, and performance and competition affective responses. Compared with other forms of resistance training, motivational characteristics of individuals engaged in CrossFit training seem to be different, whereby those engaged in CrossFit training exude a high level of self-determination, and may experience a greater sense of satisfaction and pleasure. Conclusion The present narrative review adds to the limited evidence related to CrossFit training and suggests that participation in CrossFit training is conducted with a great sense of belief and identify. Moreover, CrossFit training seems to provide inherent rewards, which may influence exercise adherence. Future studies should explore motivations and reasons as to why individuals dropout of participating in CrossFit training.
Full-text available
Introdução: O parapente é uma atividade de voo livre que utiliza um planador ultraleve flexível para decolagem, evolução em voo e pouso. Apesar do crescente número de praticantes desse esporte no Brasil, não foram encontrados dados epidemiológicos de lesões na prática de parapente no país. Objetivo: Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo analisar a incidência, tipo, área anatômica acometida, gravidade, e também verificar se há algum padrão nas lesões em pilotos de parapente no Brasil. Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo quantitativo, descritivo, analítico, transversal e retrospectivo por meio de um questionário adaptado do Formulário de Notificação de Acidentes do órgão Alemão LBA - Federal Office of Civil Aeronautics - para obter informações pertinentes aos objetivos da pesquisa. A aplicação do questionário foi realizada on-line, pelo Google Formulários. Resultados: Foram contabilizadas 575 participações válidas, sendo 92,7% dos participantes do sexo masculino, sendo 30,4% com idades entre 41 e 50 anos. Entre eles, 68,6% relataram já ter sofrido uma lesão no esporte; a região anatômica de maior incidência foram os membros inferiores (44,09%), sendo o pouso, a fase do voo em que aconteceu a maioria das lesões (68,01%). Uma regressão logística identificou que “idade” e “tipo de homologação” eram os dois fatores associados à ocorrência de lesão na amostra estudada. Conclusão: Com base nesta pesquisa, é possível elaborar um programa de treinamento funcional para os praticantes desta modalidade, visando um melhor desempenho, medidas de prevenção de lesões associadas ao esporte, bem como propiciar a reabilitação adequada aos pilotos de parapente.
Full-text available
RESUMO A prática de judô integra situações variadas de contato físico e exigências específicas, tornando-o uma modalidade competitiva e com alto índice de lesões musculoesqueléticas (LME). Este estudo transversal teve por objetivo descrever a epidemiologia de LME e analisar a relação entre diferentes características e a ocorrência de lesão em judocas. A casuística integrou 111 participantes de ambos os sexos. Para tomar informações sobre lesões, utilizou-se um inquérito de morbidade referida. Para análise estatística, foi empregado o teste de Goodman de proporções multinomiais. A relação entre fatores associados com LME foi avaliada por meio de regressão logística. Foram relatados 135 LME, com prevalência de 65% (72 esportistas), totalizando 1,22 LME/atleta. A maioria dos relatos foi constituída por lesões articulares decorrentes de traumas (n=50 casos, 37%), sendo que entorse de tornozelo (25,2%) e luxação de ombro (17,8%) foram os casos com maior frequência. Entre as lesões ósseas, verificou-se maior proporção de casos graves (25 casos; 18,5%). Sexo e carga horária semanal constituíram-se como as principais características preditivas para ocorrência de LME no judô (p<0,001). Conclui-se que as lesões articulares traumáticas em tornozelo e ombro foram as principais LME no judô. Sexo masculino e maior carga horária semanal constituíram-se como as principais características preditivas de lesão entre judocas.
Full-text available
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a che-cklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
Full-text available
Exertional (exercise-induced) rhabdomyolysis is a potentially life threatening condition that has been the subject of research, intense discussion, and media attention. The causes of rhabdomyolysis are numerous and can include direct muscle injury, unaccustomed exercise, ischemia, extreme temperatures, electrolyte abnormalities, endocrinologic conditions, genetic disorders, autoimmune disorders, infections, drugs, toxins, and venoms. The objective of this article is to review the literature on exertional rhabdomyolysis, identify precipitating factors, and examine the role of the dietary supplement creatine monohydrate. PubMed and SPORTDiscus databases were searched using the terms rhabdomyolysis, muscle damage, creatine, creatine supplementation, creatine monohydrate, and phosphocreatine. Additionally, the references of papers identified through this search were examined for relevant studies. A meta-analysis was not performed. Although the prevalence of rhabdomyolysis is low, instances still occur where exercise is improperly prescribed or used as punishment, or incomplete medical history is taken, and exertional rhabdomyolysis occurs. Creatine monohydrate does not appear to be a precipitating factor for exertional rhabdomyolysis. Healthcare professionals should be able to recognize the basic signs of exertional rhabdomyolysis so prompt treatment can be administered. For the risk of rhabdomyolysis to remain low, exercise testing and prescription must be properly conducted based on professional standards.
Full-text available
The objective of the study was to examine injury epidemiology and risk factors for injury in CrossFit athletes. A survey was administered to athletes at four owner-operated facilities in South Florida. Respondents reported number, location of injury, and training exposure from the preceding six months and answered questions regarding potential risk factors for injury. Fifty out of 191 athletes sustained 62 injuries during CrossFit participation in the preceding six months. The most frequently injured locations were the shoulder, knee, and lower back. Injury incidence was 2.3/1000 athlete training hours. Competitors were more likely to be injured (40% v 19%, p = 0.002) and had greater weekly athlete training hours (7.3 ± 7.0 v 4.9 ± 2.9, p <0.001) than non-competitors. Athletes who reported injury also reported significantly higher values for the following risk factors: years of participation (2.7 ± 1.8 v 1.8 ± 1.5, p = 0.001), weekly athlete training hours (7.3 ± 3.8 v 4.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.020), weekly athlete-exposures (6.4 ± 3.8 v 4.7 ± 2.1, p = 0.003), height (1.72 ± 0.09 m v 1.68 ± 0.01 m, p = 0.011), and body mass (78.24 ± 16.86 kg v 72.91 ± 14.77 kg, p = 0.037). Injury rates during CrossFit and location of injuries were similar to those previously reported. Injury incidence was similar to related sports, including gymnastics and powerlifting. While being a competitor was related to injury, increased exposure and length of participation in CrossFit likely underlied this association. Specifically, increased exposure to training in the form of greater weekly athlete training hours and weekly participations may contribute to injury. Increased height and body mass were also related to injury which is likely reflective of increased load utilized during training. Further research is warranted to determine if biomechanical factors associated with greater height and ability to lift greater loads are modifiable factors that can be adapted to reduce the increase risk of injury during CrossFit.
Objectives: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the injury location, injury diagnosis, injury risk factors and injury prevention among practitioners of different combat sports. News: This review was conducted using databases of MEDLINE (via Pubmed), Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar. The studies concerned were classified according to the nature of the combat sports and the type of the injury by three authors using the titles, abstracts and full texts if available. Data from different observational studies suggest that there is a significant injury problem in combat sport in general because the main goal of the practitioners is to strike and/or to project opponent with maximal power and speed in order to win. This exposes them to permanent risk of injuries, which limit usually training effects, provoke disability conditions with competitiveness loss and often ruin their careers. However, it varies considerably across different styles. Researchers used retrospective and prospective method to explore specificity of injury but little is known about the actual severity of injuries in combat sports. Prospects and projects: Future studies are highly encouraged to adopt stronger methodologies. The long-term consequences of injuries, a detailed balance sheet by nature of injury and specific preventive strategies are needed to support the findings presented in this review. Conclusion: In this review, a preliminary injury profiles in combat sports was established containing location and types of injuries. Compared to other sports, combat sports are no more dangerous especially for beginner practitioners.
Context: The underlying mechanism in 27% of ankle sprains is a fall while navigating stairs. Therefore, the step-down test (SDT) may be useful to investigate dynamic postural stability deficits in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Objective: The study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of the forward and lateral SDT protocol between individuals with CAI and uninjured controls. Design: Test-retest Study Setting: University Hospital Participants: A total of 46, 23 individuals with CAI and 23 uninjured controls Main Outcome Measures: Time-to-stabilization (TTS) of the forward and lateral SDT Results: The absolute reliability (SEM = 0.04 to 0.12 s) (SDD = 0.11 to 0.33 s) of the SDT protocol was acceptable, whereas the relative reliability (ICC3,k = 0.12 to 0.63), discriminant validity (p = 0.42 to 0.99) (AUC = 0.50 to 0.57) and convergent validity (Spearman Correlation r = -0.29 to 0.19) were not. Conclusions: The step-down test appears to not be challenging enough to detect dynamic postural stability differences between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability. However, the step-down test may be capable of measuring change over time based on its good absolute reliability.
With the increase in popularity of the CrossFit exercise program, occupational health nurses may be asked questions about the appropriateness of CrossFit training for workers. This systematic literature review was conducted to analyze the current research on CrossFit, and assess the benefits and risks of this exercise strategy. Thirteen studies ( N = 2,326 participants) examined the use of CrossFit training among adults; CrossFit is comparable to other exercise programs with similar injury rates and health outcomes. Occupational health nurses should assess previous injuries prior to recommending this form of exercise. Ideal candidates for CrossFit are adults who seek high-intensity exercise with a wide variety of exercise components.
Clinical Scenario: CrossFit is a form of exercise that incorporates rapid and successive high-intensity, ballistic movements. As CrossFit becomes an increasingly popular fitness option, it is important to determine how rates of injury compare to more traditional forms of exercise. This review was conducted to ascertain the incidence of injury with CrossFit relative to other forms of exercise. Focused Clinical Question: Are injuries more common with CrossFit training than other forms of exercise? Summary of Key Findings The literature was searched for studies that compared injury rates among individuals who participated in CrossFit fitness programs to participants in other exercise programs The search initially yielded >100 results which was narrowed down to three level 2b retrospective cohort studies that was deemed to have met inclusion/exclusion criteria In all three reviewed studies, the reported incidences of injuries associated with CrossFit training programs were comparable or lower than rates of injury in Olympic weightlifting, distance running, track and field, rugby, or gymnastics. Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence suggests that the injury risk from CrossFit training is comparable to Olympic weightlifting, distance running, track and field, rugby, football, ice hockey, soccer or gymnastics. Injuries to the shoulder(s) appear to be somewhat common with CrossFit. However, the certitude of these conclusions is questionable given the lack of randomization, control, or uniform training in the reviewed studies. Clinicians should be aware that injury is more prevalent in cases where supervision is not always available to athletes. This is more often the case for male participants who may not actively seek supervision during CrossFit exercise. Strength of Recommendation: Level 2b evidence from three retrospective cohort studies indicates that the risk of injury from participation in CrossFit is comparable to or lower than some common forms of exercise or strength training.
The CrossFit™ workout methodology has experienced tremendous growth and popularity over the last 10 years. This programme utilises high-intensity workouts that incorporate a wide variety of calisthenics and weight lifting movements, and is typically delivered in a group format by a qualified instructor. Gaining an understanding of the motivational factors underlying CrossFit participation will benefit fitness trainers of all types. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among goal contents, psychological need satisfaction, behavioural regulation, and participation frequency in a sample of CrossFit athletes. Participants (n = 322) completed instruments assessing exercise goal contents, basic psychological need satisfaction, and behavioural regulations in exercise, and a survey of demographic and participation variables. Having intrinsic goals, such as developing skills or improving health, was found to predict greater psychological need satisfaction. Competence and autonomy need satisfaction were found to predict higher levels of intrinsic and identified regulations. Participation frequency was positively predicted by intrinsic regulation, intrinsic goal contents, competence need satisfaction, and was negatively predicted by external regulation. When examining the full path-analysis model, competence and autonomy basic psychological need satisfaction were found to partially mediate the relationship between goal content and intrinsic regulation. Based on these findings, health and fitness leaders can maximise participant’s intrinsic motivation by emphasising goals focused on skill learning and health. Additionally, fitness leaders should make efforts to enhance participants’ feeling of competence and autonomy.