Technical Report

An Evaluation of the Microsoft Partners in Learning (PiL) New Zealand Initiative

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This report is the first in a series of reports examining the efficacy and performance of a range of projects comprising the Microsoft Partners in Learning (NZ) initiative. Partners in Learning is an international programme funded by Microsoft, and has as its aims to: 1. 2. 3. • Reduce the digital divide with regard to teacher and school access to ICT; Build skills to support ICT use in schools; • Encourage more effective use of ICT in schools (Watson & Kilcher, 2004) The long term objective of the programme internationally is to facilitate “significant educational and social change, through delivery of teacher training, technology tools, and ICT access to produce measurable benefits for schools, teachers and students” (Watson & Kilcher, 2004, p. 1). This first report outlines the nature of the New Zealand version of this programme, provides a brief overview of the nature of projects operating within it, identifies and discusses the entry positions of key participants, and provides some early indicators of the way the projects are shaping up and how they appear, at this stage, to be compliant with the international goals for PiL.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This study uses a national probability sample of 1,027 mathematics and science teachers to provide the first large-scale empirical comparison of effects of different characteristics of professional development on teachers’ learning. Results, based on ordinary least squares regression, indicate three core features of professional development activities that have significant, positive effects on teachers’ self-reported increases in knowledge and skills and changes in classroom practice: (a) focus on content knowledge; (b) opportunities for active learning; and (c) coherence with other learning activities. It is primarily through these core features that the following structural features significantly affect teacher learning: (a) the form of the activity (e.g., workshop vs. study group); (b) collective participation of teachers from the same school, grade, or subject; and (c) the duration of the activity.
Article
Full-text available
This report examines effects of structural and process features of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice and efficacy. It is based on four recent (2002-2003) studies undertaken through the Australian Government Quality Teacher Programme, designed to enhance teacher quality. The total data set for the survey study includes 3,250 teachers who had participated in eighty individual professional development1 activities within these studies. Teachers were surveyed at least three months after participating in an activity, which provided them with the opportunity to gauge the impact of programs on their practice. To investigate factors affecting impact, a theoretical model was developed based on recent research into the characteristics of effective professional development and tested using blockwise regression analysis. The model included contextual factors (e.g., school support), structural features of programs (e.g. ,length), process features (e.g., emphasis on content; active learning; examination of student work; feedback; follow-up), a mediating variable (level of professional community generated), and four outcome measures (knowledge; practice; student learning and efficacy). Consistent significant direct effects were found across the four studies for the impact of content focus, active learning, and follow-up on knowledge and professional community. Feedback was rarely incorporated into program design. Impact on efficacy was strongly related to the perceived impact of activities on teachers' practice and student learning outcomes.
Elements of a Model of Effective Teachers. Faculty of Education, Deakin University
  • Clark
  • J Walsh
Clark, J and Walsh, J. (2005). Elements of a Model of Effective Teachers. Faculty of Education, Deakin University. Retrieved December 16, 2005 from www.aare.edu.au/02pap/wal02220.htm
The Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in New Zealand Schools
Education Review Office, (2000). The Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in New Zealand Schools. ERO Publications. Wellington: New Zealand Education Review Office, (2001). The Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in New Zealand Schools. ERO Publications. Wellington: New Zealand Education Review Office, (2005). E-learning in Primary Schools. ERO Publications. Wellington: New Zealand
The Essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus
  • W D Hawley
  • L Valli
Hawley, W.D. and Valli, L. (1999). The Essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Sykes, G. and Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.). Handbook of Teaching and Policy. New York: Teachers College.
The Knowledge Economy
Information Technology Advisory Group, (1999). The Knowledge Economy. ITAG Publications. Wellington.
The Science and Technology Fellowship Scheme: An evaluation. Education Department
  • K Jordan
  • N Galt
Jordan, K., and Galt, N. (1999). The Science and Technology Fellowship Scheme: An evaluation. Education Department. The University of Canterbury. Christchurch: New Zealand.
Information and Communications Technology in New Zealand Schools
Learning Centre Trust, (2003). Information and Communications Technology in New Zealand Schools 1993-2003. Retrieved January 16, 2006 from http://www.learningcentretrust.org.nz/activities.htm
Enhancing Understanding through Practice: The N.Z science, mathematics and technology education fellowship scheme
  • Spratt
  • A Knox
Spratt, P and Knox, A. (2003) Enhancing Understanding through Practice: The N.Z science, mathematics and technology education fellowship scheme. The Royal Society of New Zealand.
PiL Program Evaluation: Guidance for academic program managers and evaluators
  • Watson
  • A Kilcher
Watson, N and Kilcher, A. (2004). PiL Program Evaluation: Guidance for academic program managers and evaluators. Microsoft Partners in Learning.