BookPDF Available

Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities

Authors:

Abstract

‘Degrowth’, a type of ‘postgrowth’, is becoming a strong political, practical and cultural movement for downscaling and transforming societies beyond capitalist growth and non-capitalist productivism to achieve global sustainability and satisfy everyone’s basic needs. This groundbreaking collection on housing for degrowth addresses key challenges of unaffordable, unsustainable and anti-social housing today, including going beyond struggles for a 'right to the city' to a 'right to metabolism', advocating refurbishment versus demolition, and revealing controversies within the degrowth movement on urbanisation, decentralisation and open localism. International case studies show how housing for degrowth is based on sufficiency and conviviality, living a ‘one planet lifestyle’ with a common ecological footprint. This book explores environmental, cultural and economic housing and planning issues from interdisciplinary perspectives such as urbanism, ecological economics, environmental justice, housing studies and policy, planning studies and policy, sustainability studies, political ecology, social change and degrowth. It will appeal to students and scholars across a wide range of disciplines. See more here — https://www.routledge.com/Housing-for-Degrowth-Principles-Models-Challenges-and-Opportunities/Nelson-Schneider/p/book/9781138558052
April 2018 draft
1
Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities
Edited by Anitra Nelson and François Schneider
Routledge-Earthscan — Environmental Humanities Series
Forthcoming — late 2018/early 2019
Contents
Lists of Figures, Tables and Boxes
Foreword
Joan Martinez-Alier
Acknowledgements
List of abbreviations
List of contributors
I. Simple Living for All
1. Housing for growth narratives
Anitra Nelson
2. Housing for degrowth narratives
François Schneider
II. Housing Justice
3. From the ‘right to the city’ to the ‘right to metabolism’
Elisabeth Skarðhamar Olsen, Marco Orefice and Giovanni Pietrangeli
4. How can squatting contribute to degrowth?
Claudio Cattaneo
III. Housing Sufficiency
5. Rethinking home as a node for transition
Pernilla Hagbert
6. Framing degrowth: The radical potential of tiny house mobility
April Anson
7. Housing and climate change resilience: Vanuatu —
Wendy Christie and John Salong
April 2018 draft
2
IV. Reducing Demand
8. Christiania: A poster child for degrowth?
Natasha Verco
9. Refurbishment vs demolition? Social housing campaigning for degrowth
Mara Ferreri
10. The Simpler Way: Housing, living and settlements
Ted Trainer
V. Ecological Housing and Planning
11. Degrowth: A perspective from Bengaluru, South India
Chitra Vishwanath
12. Low impact living: More than a house
Jasmine Dale, Robin Marwege and Anja Humburg
13. Neighbourhoods as the basic module of the global commons
Hans Widmer (‘P.M.’) with Francois Schneider
14. The quality of small dwellings in a neighbourhood context
Harpa Stefansdottir and Jin Xue
VI. Whither Urbanisation?
15. Housing for degrowth: Space, planning and distribution
Jin Xue
16. Urbanisation as the death of politics: Sketches of degrowth municipalism
Aaron Vansintjan
17. Scale, place and degrowth: Getting from here to ‘there’ — On Xue and Vansintjan I
Andreas Exner
18. Geography matters: Ideas for a degrowth spatial planning paradigm — On Xue and
Vansintjan II
Karl Krähmer
19. ‘Open localism’ — On Xue and Vansintjan III
François Schneider and Anitra Nelson
VII. Anti-Capitalist Values and Relations
20. Mietshäuser Syndikat: Collective ownership, the ‘housing question’ and degrowth
Lina Hurlin
21. Non-monetary eco-collaborative living for degrowth
Anitra Nelson
22. Summary and research futures for housing for degrowth
Anitra Nelson and François Schneider
... Drawing on the Dutch movements of old, grassroots counter-plans were developed. They did not stop at bike plans, but made counter-policies that placed inclusivity at the core of food (Artmann and Sartison, 2018;Roberts and Geels, 2019;Lacy, 2000), housing (Nelson and Schneider, 2018;Durning, 2021;Geissel, 2022;Koch, 2022;Bua and Bussu, 2023), work (Lacy, 2000;Weeks, 2011;Clark, 2019), and energy (Burke, 2018;Riofrancos, 2020;Sarnow and Tiedemann, 2022;Sovacool et al, 2023). As the popularity of these grew, councils began adopting them -or stepping up with their own initiatives. ...
Article
Full-text available
Henri Lefebvre wrote of a future world turned upside down. This counter-narrative is an exploration of what that might look like and how that may come about. Written with scholar-activists in mind, this is a call to action for new modes of storytelling. As a proof of concept, this article offers fresh methodological and epistemological contributions in just transition scholarship. Transcending history, this speculative nonfiction story traverses a counterfactual future transpiring between 2025 and 2049. Here, present tense refers to 31 December 2049. However, the focus is on the ideas and struggles that provide the foundations that would make a utopian future possible. There is particular attention paid to the possible role speculative nonfiction scholarship could play. The story begins with an overview of its theoretical frame of ecopedagogy before delving into its methodological framework within speculative nonfiction that draws on backcasting and autoethnographic traditions. This future is grounded in historical precedent – both from literature as well my own lived experience. The second section provides a short overview of the motonormative imaginary that helped create the troubled cities we have today. What follows is not a probable , but a possible future. Here, the metacrisis is overcome through an explosion of veganic urban agriculture that upends the animal industrial complex – making way for a radical rewilding of cities and agricultural lands, as well as a revolution in inclusive democracy. Finally, I explore how the envisioned biophilic cities might transform our relationships with the more-than-human world, with one another and ourselves.
... We keep the data requirements of our framework as parsimonious as possible to ensure broad applicability. The focus of the toolbox is on improving the efficiency and consistency of the residential sector, complementing studies that emphasize the potential of greater sufficiency in the residential sector 4,5 . In this paper, we apply our toolbox to the case of Germany to illustrate its core functionalities and analytical potential. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a general framework for estimating the renovation and investment requirements associated with a socio-ecological transformation of the residential sector that effectively reduces the net emissions of the residential sector (close) to zero. The framework takes ecological and distributional considerations into account and aims to provide concrete outcomes suitable to inform policy-making, while being as parsimonious as possible on the side of data requirements. All key steps associated with this framework are compiled in an openly accessible toolbox that can be adapted to different country-specific contexts. This paper takes the German case as an example to illustrate the main assumptions, data requirements, and outcomes that can be derived from this toolbox.
... It must therefore be of highest political priority to not only launch home swapping offers just hoping for older people to freeup living space by moving to a smaller apartment, but also to back them with the necessary support structures and structural changes. Last but not least, and this is a long-term task, the current dominant growth-oriented norms with regard to housing provision, where bigger is better (Charles, 2019;Dowling & Power, 2012;Kuhlmann, 2020;Nelson, 2019), have to be challenged, as downsizing is currently all too often associated with sacrifice and a social downgrade. ...
Article
The current global trend of increasing per capita living space in combination with more and smaller households will intensify resource and energy consumptions in the housing sector. Scientific scholars, thus, unanimously plead for a reduction of per capita living consumption. Since the demographic trend of aging will further contribute to a high increase of single households and cause further under-occupation of living space, the potential to spatially downsize is particularly high among those older age cohorts. However, the often-limited housing choices for seniors do not allow for a large-scale downsizing development. Beyond that, the discourse on housing downsizing lacks a discussion of distinct strategies of how to effectively offer options for older people to do so. Hence, the paper at hand presents the distinct instrument of home swapping which has lately been introduced by several German municipalities to more adequately allocate the existing housing space. Since a profound scientific debate of this approach is still pending, this contribution discusses home swapping as a suitable strategy to incentivize older households to downsize on their living space. In order to do so, the home swapping schemes of four German cities have been analyzed to add scientific evidence on the potentials and challenges of the instrument to downsize housing consumption.
Article
Multi-scalar strategies, upscaling local degrowth initiatives, and rescaling are considered necessary for transforming towards degrowth. With burgeoning research on spatiality and scales in the degrowth literature, it becomes pertinent to reflect on the ontological foundations underlying the concept of scale and to strengthen some common ground for approaches to scales for the degrowth agenda. Being informed by the critical realist ontology, this paper aims to lay an ontological underpinning for degrowth scalar approaches, situated within the planning context. The argument starts with an ontological inquiry of ‘what is scale’. With an understanding of spatial scales as social structures, the argument moves to explicate ‘how does scale matter for degrowth initiatives’. This explication conceptualises five dimensions relevant to the degrowth agenda: scalarising degrowth values and norms, scalar mechanisms, scalar strategies, cross-scale impacts and rescaling. The conceptual framework is then further illustrated by exploring multi-scalar strategies for degrowth housing development and planning, partly contextualised by the case of Oslo City. Finally, the paper concludes with suggestions on ‘how can degrowth research and movements better integrate the question of scale’. Explanatory, critical, relational and holistic approaches are proposed as ways of taking spatial scales into account as an integral part of degrowth transformation.
Chapter
In this chapter we will focus on the disturbing establishment of a frame of “mafia” to criminalize housing activism in Italy, within the growing trend of framing activist groups as “organized crime” in several EU countries. We will focus on a recent case happened in Milan, where a group of housing activists in the peripheral neighborhood of Giambellino-Lorenteggio have been sentenced up to five years of imprisonment, after the Courts declared that their pro-housing network was an “associazione a delinquere”, an association to “commit crime”. The strategic use of a language of mafia and organized crime shows how the increased repression of dissent in a time of crisis may result into a shift in legal categories and frames of meaning that goes well beyond the intention that was behind their establishment.
Article
Full-text available
As the social and ecological costs of capital-driven housing markets become increasingly apparent, local governments are (re)establishing collaborations with housing organizations that prioritize affordability and sustainability over profits. This hesitant re-orientation, however, takes place under conditions of strained local budgets and the inscription of market principles into existing public policies and planning law. In this article, we develop an interdisciplinary perspective on the interplay between municipal housing policies, planning and legal frameworks, and collaborative housing organizations in the district development project “Kleineschholz” in Freiburg, Germany. Promoted by the local government as being 100% oriented towards the common good, multiple elements of the project are geared towards community involvement and a close dialogue between public bodies and housing organizations. At the same time, the local government and administration navigate divergent interests within and outside municipal institutions, multi-level legal frameworks, financial constraints, as well as institutional routines. We trace how the project’s common-good orientation is integrated into the co-productive process between housing policy, planning law, and collaborative housing groups. Our analysis centers on the process of concept-based tendering which is a key municipal lever for the project’s orientation towards the common good. Moving beyond the situated district of Kleineschholz, we outline the potentials and challenges of translating an orientation towards the common good into collaborative district development, against the background of present political and legal frameworks.
Article
Full-text available
The City Region Food System (CRFS) approach has emerged in recent years as a framework for shaping urban food governance and policies that overcome the methodological cityism of approaches limited to urban territories defined by administrative boundaries. This article critically analyses the concept referring to the case study of the metropolitan city of Turin, Italy, as part of action research contributing to ongoing efforts to establish food policies. The discussion focuses on three dimensions: (1) the spatial definition of the city region; (2) the relation between the support of short and the re-assessment of long supply chains, with reference to a relational understanding of space; (3) the tensions between the CRFS as an analytical concept and a transformative framework. Results suggest that there is no linear path to define the spatial limits for a CRFS analysis and that a pragmatic approach can best serve policies; that long supply chains should not be ignored but integrated into local food policies; that there are contradictions in the transformative dimension of the CRFS literature when investigating the underlying sustainable development framework from a growth-critical perspective; and that separating the analytical more clearly from the normative dimension could make the discussion more productive.
Article
Full-text available
In this commentary, we argue for the low-impact city as an alternative to the dominant urban imaginary of the low-carbon city. We adopt an ecological economics lens to expose the limitations of the urban resource efficiency paradigm when tackling environmental degradation beyond city boundaries. Based on the interpretation of urbanisation as a material practice, we urge for a fundamental recalibration of sustainability paradigms in urban planning. To integrate the impacts of urbanisation on non-urban landscapes within the framework of urban sustainability science, we furthermore stress the urgent need for frugality, resource reduction, and inclusiveness in urban planning practice.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.