ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed “dark traits”) have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality ( D ). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one’s individual utility—disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others—accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies ( N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... The findings of Buckels et al. (2013), for example, indicated a high correlation between traits of sadism, callousness, spitefulness, sadism, and psychopathy, which demonstrates the proximity between the constructs. Moshagen, Hilbig, and Zettler (2018) proposed an argument that sought to unify the theory and measurement of several aversive traits, indicating that a single common core can capture the shared variance across such traits and thus indicators of socially aversive or morally questionable behavior. Specifically, they investigated nine personality traits that have been associated with deviant attitudes and behaviors: egoism, Machiavellianism, moral disengagement, narcissism, psychological entitlement, psychopathy, sadism, self-interest, and spitefulness. ...
... Specifically, they investigated nine personality traits that have been associated with deviant attitudes and behaviors: egoism, Machiavellianism, moral disengagement, narcissism, psychological entitlement, psychopathy, sadism, self-interest, and spitefulness. According to the conceptualization and supported by the empirical findings (using a bifactor approach), these traits shared a common core, termed the Dark Factor of Personality, or simply D (Moshagen et al., 2018), similar to the g factor that measures general intelligence. Prior studies, before the conception of D, suggested this possibility, indicating that dark features share conceptual similarities and that the measures overlap empirically (Furnham, Richards, & Paulhus, 2013). ...
... It indicates the dispositional tendency of an individual with a high D level to manifest immoral, unethical, and socially transgressive, harmful attitudes and behaviors. In general, individuals with high D tend to exalt their usefulness and their personal goals, lowering the value and usefulness of other people, putting their interests first, and harming the interests of others; all of this, supported by a system of self-justifications that allow them to think and act with little feeling of remorse or guilt (Hilbig, Moshagen, Thielmann, & Zettler, 2022;Moshagen et al., 2018). ...
Article
Aversive or socially undesirable personality traits, characterized by harmful attitudes and behaviors, are gaining more momentum. In the present study, we aimed to describe the cross-cultural adaptation of the versions of the Dark Factor Measure to the Brazilian context and compare results between the general population and incarcerated men to provide insights into socially undesirable traits across different populations. Participated in our study 3229 people aged 18 to 78 years (M = 31.26; SD = 10.01) and 147 incarcerated men aged 18 to 53 years (M = 28.91; SD = 7.31). We used an Exploratory Bifactor Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) to investigate the instrument adequacy. Our findings reveal that the Dark Factor Measure, with its three versions (i.e., D70, D35, D16), demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties in Brazilian-Portuguese when using a bifactor and unidimensional model, supporting the reliable assessment of the dark core of personality. Additionally, our study highlights sex differences, with men displaying higher levels of dark personality traits when compared to women and incarcerated men showing much higher levels of darker traits when compared with men from the general population. In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unifying construct of the Dark Factor of Personality and its relevance in understanding aversive behaviors.
... An essential intersection in this area of research concerns aversive and prosocial behaviors. On the one hand, people with higher levels of aversive traits tend to exhibit undesirable behaviors and employ moral disengagement strategies to mitigate their guilt (Moshagen, Hilbig, and Zettler 2018). They employ diverse tactics to maintain a positive self-image while engaging in exploitative and unethical acts (Navas et al. 2021). ...
... Findings also demonstrated good results in terms of predictive validity. The PMDS is mentioned in the literature as a very relevant measure of moral disengagement (see, e.g., Moshagen, Hilbig, and Zettler 2018), however psychometric validation studies examining this scale are somewhat scarce. As far as we are aware, the psychometric properties of the PMDS have been examined in a few languages/cultures, such as Persian (Nasiry, Noori, and Aslzaker 2021), Ukrainian (Karkovska 2020), Chinese (Miao et al. 2015), and Spanish (Lingán-Huamán, Dominguez-Lara, and Serpa-Barrientos in press). ...
Article
The propensity to morally disengage can be an essential driver of unethical, antisocial, and criminal behavior. The present study examines the psychometric properties of the Propensity to Morally Disengage Scale (PMDS) among a convenience sample of 242 male and female participants (M = 30.19 years, SD = 12.78, range = 16-77) from Portugal. The expected one-factor structure obtained an adequate fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency/reliability was adequate as measured by the alpha and omega coefficients. Convergent validity (i.e., with dark traits, low self-control, violence evaluation, and antisociality/criminality tendencies measures), divergent validity (i.e., with basic empathy and light traits of personality measures), and criterion-related validity (e.g., with trouble with the law, arrested by police, sentenced to prison variables) were demonstrated with Pearson and point-biserial correlations. Measurement invariance across gender was established. Significant gender differences in the PMDS scores were found, with males scoring significantly higher than females. Our findings support using the PMDS Portuguese version as a short, valid, and reliable measure of moral disengagement.
... Additionally, it is worth noting that there is ongoing debate about whether a focus on the three Dark Triad traits separately is theoretically and empirically sound. While some scholars favour an approach that considers the Dark Triad traits as three separate factors, others advocate a 'unification' lens, arguing that the Dark Triad reflects a general factor (e.g., Moshagen et al., 2018). Supported by the three factor solution found in our sample, we decided to approach the Dark Triad as separate traits as this allowed us to pinpoint detailed differences in how the different strategies these traits represent may be linked to sexual harassment experiences in different relationship types. ...
Article
Full-text available
As romantic relationships in young adulthood (18-25 years) are frequently characterized by experimentation and risk-taking, this could make young adults particularly vulnerable to experience sexual harassment by a dating or committed partner. This study examines young adults' victimization and perpetration experiences of online and in-person sexual harassment with their dating or committed partner, and explores the role of the Dark Triad personality traits. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 458 young adults, 371 of whom were in a romantic relationship (Mage = 20.80, SDage = 1.51, 25.6% men). Our findings revealed that all measured sexual harassment experiences were significantly more prevalent among young adults in dating relationships compared to those in committed relationships. Furthermore, in both relationship types, all online and in-person experiences of sexual harassment were significantly linked, indicating that these harmful experiences occur across contexts. Additionally, all victimization and perpetration experiences were significantly linked in both relationship types, meaning that some young adults were both victim and perpetrator of these behaviours. Lastly, we found that sexual harassment was linked to narcissism in dating relationships, but to Machiavellianism in committed relationships, indicating that different strategies may explain these behaviours.
... Abuse of power in the academic context often results from an interplay of several factors: 1) Some personal dispositions (especially a readiness to maximize one's own personal benefit at the cost of others, and to overstep boundaries, rules and even laws in doing so; Paulhus & Williams, 2002;Moshagen et al., 2018) make abuses of power more likely. ...
... According to scientific literature, Machiavellianism has emerged that personality traits belonging to the dark triad are associated with one another through a common factor, called "D factor", in other words the tendency to push one's individual utility to the limit, to pursue one's own goals, to focus on oneself, without taking others into account. The D Factor tends to be associated with certain obscure personality traits, such as humiliating others, lying, manipulating others, without feeling any remorse or guilt [19,21]. ...
... Participants also performed the Bomb Risk Elicitation Task (BRET, Crosetto and Filippin 2013) and the Personality Traits questionnaire(Ashton and Lee 2009) to be used as controls as dishonesty has been found to correlate with both risk preferences(Becker 1968) and personality(Moshagen et al. 2018;Hilbig et al. 2018). 2 P-values from one-sample t tests.3 Where not else stated, from now on, p-values refer to Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) tests for averages within each pair. ...
Article
Full-text available
Our experiment explores the impact of asymmetric incentives on collaboration within a context where participants can coordinate and potentially engage in deceptive practices to secure financial gains. We contrast two scenarios: one in which cooperation results in an equal distribution of gains, and another where the distribution is unequal. Our investigation focuses on the dynamics of collaborative behavior over time and digs into individual strategies employed by participants. We find that corruptive collaboration persists when its gains are unequally divided. Over time, participants acquire experience in collaborative tactics, often utilizing their reports to covert signals. Notably, participants coordinate around compromise distributions that yield smaller payments, suggesting that this context may actually reduce the perceived cost of dishonesty.
Article
Full-text available
La maldad, rasgo presente en la conducta humana, es un indispensable tópico de estudio para la psicología, cuyo objetivo fundamental, con relación a este rasgo, es evaluar y comprender el daño que puede causar a los individuos.Objetivo: Construir un instrumento con el propósito de medir la maldad y que posea indispensables propiedades psicométricas, como validez y confiabilidad. Material y métodos: El estudio fue de tipo instrumental en una muestra no probabilística, mediante la aplicación online de la Escala de Maldad (ESMA-31), que consta de 31 ítems con 4 dimensiones: egoísmo, idealismo, sadismo y omisión de ayuda. La muestra estuvo conformada por 403 estudiantes de Psicología de una universidad pública de Lima, cuyas edades fluctuaron entre 18 y 31 años. Para la construcción de la escala se consideraron las 6 dimensiones y los 36 ítems de la primera versión. Resultados: El coeficiente omega tuvo un valor entre 0,70 y 0,74; y el alfa ordinal, entre 0,82 y 0,93. Respecto a la validez de contenido, los valores V de Aiken estuvieron entre 0,89 y 1,00 (p = 0,001). El análisis factorial confirmatorio evidenció cuatro dimensiones con adecuados índices de ajuste [χ2/gl = 2; SRMR = 0,064; CFI = 0,955; TLI = 0,951; RMSEA =0,054]. Conclusiones: El instrumento presenta evidencias de validez de contenido y de estructura interna, además de una adecuada consistencia interna de las puntuaciones
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review Sadistic pleasure—the enjoyment of harm-infliction to others—can have devastating interpersonal and societal consequences. The goal of the current review is to illuminate the nomological net of traits related to sadism. We aim to achieve an understanding of the current empirical status on the link between sadism and personality disorders, psychopathy, the Dark Triad, and basic personality traits in clinical and community-based samples. Recent Findings The field is dominated by self-report studies on the Dark Triad with convenience samples. The link with DSM personality disorders has hardly been empirically studied. Existing evidence shows that sadism is most strongly related to increased psychopathic personality traits. Summary Sadism can originate both from the interpersonal, affective, and behavioural basis of dark personality traits. There are diverging ideas on the differential status between sadism, psychopathy, and other dark traits. Research is needed on the causal impact of the broader range of personality disorders on sadism, in more diverse samples, including behavioural assessments of sadistic pleasure, as well as on the interplay of such personality traits with situational and affective aspects, and victim attitudes.
Article
Full-text available
Among test statistics for assessing overall model fit in structural equation modeling (SEM), the Satorra–Bentler rescaled statistic (Formula presented.) is most widely used when the normality assumption is violated. However, many researchers have found that (Formula presented.) tends to overreject correct models when the number of variables (p) is large and/or the sample size (N) is small. Modifications of (Formula presented.) have been proposed, but few studies have examined their performance against each other, especially when p is large. This article systematically evaluates 10 corrected versions of (Formula presented.). Results show that the Bartlett correction and a recently proposed rank correction perform better than others in controlling Type I error rates, according to their deviations from the nominal rate. Nevertheless, the performance of both corrections depends heavily on p in addition to N. As p becomes relatively large, none of the corrected versions can properly control Type I errors even when N is rather large.
Article
Full-text available
Guidelines to evaluate the fit of structural equation models can only offer meaningful insights to the extent that they apply equally to a wide range of situations. However, a number of previous studies found that statistical power to reject a misspecified model increases and descriptive fit-indices deteriorate when loadings are high, thereby inappropriately panelizing high reliability indicators. Based on both theoretical considerations and empirical simulation studies, we show that previous results only hold for a particular definition and a particular type of model error. At a constant degree of misspecification (as measured through the minimum of the fit-function), statistical power to reject a wrong model and noncentrality based fit-indices (such as the root-mean squared error of approximation; RMSEA) are independent of loading magnitude. If the degree of model error is controlled through the average residuals, higher loadings are associated with increased statistical power and a higher RMSEA when the measurement model is misspecified, but with decreased power and a lower RMSEA when the structural model is misspecified. In effect, inconsistencies among noncentrality and residual based fit-indices can provide information about possible sources of misfit that would be obscured when considering either measure in isolation. (PsycINFO Database Record
Article
Full-text available
Economic games offer a convenient approach for the study of prosocial behavior. As an advantage, they allow for straightforward implementation of different techniques to reduce socially desirable responding. We investigated the effectiveness of the most prominent of these techniques, namely providing behavior-contingent incentives and maximizing anonymity in three versions of the Trust Game: (i) a hypothetical version without monetary incentives and with a typical level of anonymity, (ii) an incentivized version with monetary incentives and the same (typical) level of anonymity, and (iii) an indirect questioning version without incentives but with a maximum level of anonymity, rendering responses inconclusive due to adding random noise via the Randomized Response Technique. Results from a large (N = 1,267) and heterogeneous sample showed comparable levels of trust for the hypothetical and incentivized versions using direct questioning. However, levels of trust decreased when maximizing the inconclusiveness of responses through indirect questioning. This implies that levels of trust might be particularly sensitive to changes in individuals’ anonymity but not necessarily to monetary incentives.
Article
The term dark triad refers to the constellation of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Over the past few years, the concept has gained momentum, with many researchers assuming that the dark triad is a prominent antecedent of transgressive and norm-violating behavior. Our purpose in this meta-analytic review was to evaluate (a) interrelations among narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy; (b) gender differences in these traits; (c) how these traits are linked to normal personality factors; and (d) the psychosocial correlates of the dark triad. Our findings show that dark triad traits are substantially intercorrelated, somewhat more prevalent among men than women, predominantly related to the Big Five personality factor of agreeableness and the HEXACO factor of honesty-humility, and generally associated with various types of negative psychosocial outcomes. We question whether dark triad traits are sufficiently distinct and argue that the way they are currently measured is too simple to capture the malevolent sides of personality. Because most research in this domain is cross-sectional and based on self-reports, we recommend using a cross-informant approach and prospective, longitudinal research designs for studying the predictive value of dark triad features.
Article
Previous studies (Gignac, 2016; Murray & Johnson, 2013) have explored conditions for which accurate statistical comparison of a second-order and bifactor model is challenging, if not impossible. However, a mathematical basis for this problem has not been offered. We show that a second-order model implies a unique set of tetrad constraints (Bollen & Ting, 1993, 1998, 2000) that the bifactor model does not, and that the two models are distinguishable to the degree that these unique tetrad constraints are violated. Simulated population matrices, and mathematical proofs, are used to demonstrate that: (a) when a second-order model with cross-loadings or correlated residuals is true, fitting a pure (misspecified) second-order model leads to violation of the tetrad constraints, which in turn leads to the chi-square and Bayesian Information Criterion favoring a (misspecified) bifactor model, and (b) a true bifactor model can be identified only when the tetrad constraints of the second-order model are violated, which is mainly a function of the proportionality of loadings. Three model-comparison approaches are offered for applied researchers.
Article
The present study examined whether situational differences moderate the influence of narcissism on self-promotion. As the strong situation hypothesis would assume, personality influences would be lowest in strong situations that include clear cues for self-promotion. Therefore, 219 participants received different situational cues (no prime, subliminal prime, or explicit request to self-present) prior to the task to self-describe. We rated the self-descriptions to the degree of a favorable and narcissistic impression (in an agentic or communal way). Results showed that all participants promoted themselves more favorably and narcissistically in situations with an explicit request only. The impact of narcissism on self-promotion was invariant across conditions. It was concluded that narcissism leads to enhanced self-promotion irrespective of situational strength. Implications for the way we study the strong situation hypothesis are discussed.
Article
To facilitate a multidimensional approach to empathy the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) includes 4 subscales: Perspective-Taking (PT) Fantasy (FS) Empathic Concern (EC) and Personal Distress (PD). The aim of the present study was to establish the convergent and discriminant validity of these 4 subscales. Hypothesized relationships among the IRI subscales between the subscales and measures of other psychological constructs (social functioning self-esteem emotionality and sensitivity to others) and between the subscales and extant empathy measures were examined. Study subjects included 677 male and 667 female students enrolled in undergraduate psychology classes at the University of Texas. The IRI scales not only exhibited the predicted relationships among themselves but also were related in the expected manner to other measures. Higher PT scores were consistently associated with better social functioning and higher self-esteem; in contrast Fantasy scores were unrelated to these 2 characteristics. High EC scores were positively associated with shyness and anxiety but negatively linked to egotism. The most substantial relationships in the study involved the PD scale. PD scores were strongly linked with low self-esteem and poor interpersonal functioning as well as a constellation of vulnerability uncertainty and fearfulness. These findings support a multidimensional approach to empathy by providing evidence that the 4 qualities tapped by the IRI are indeed separate constructs each related in specific ways to other psychological measures.