A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Stridulation can suppress cannibalism in a specialised
araneophagous predator
Eva Líznarová
1
&Lenka Sentenská
1
&František Šťáhlavský
2
&Stano Pekár
1
Received: 31 January 2018 /Revised: 20 June 2018 /Accepted: 29 June 2018 /Published online: 10 July 2018
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
Acoustic signalling is widespread in arthropods and appears to be common in spiders, but the function is still unknown in many
species. Acoustic signals have several functions and can be used both in interspecific (e.g., to threaten potential predators) and
intraspecific (during courtship) communication. In our study, we investigated the intraspecific role of stridulation in the
araneophagous Palpimanus spider (Araneae: Palpimanidae). These spiders are specialised in hunting other spiders at all onto-
genetic stages. We hypothesised that stridulation is used to avoid cannibalism. We investigatedthe morphology of the stridulatory
apparatus, analysed the acoustic signals that various stages produce, and found two types of stridulation, low- and high-intensity
stridulation. Then, we investigated the presence of cannibalism between individuals of variable body size and the use of
stridulation during interactions. We found that cannibalism occurred only when the prosoma size difference between the two
opponents was more than 200%. Then, we paired conspecific large control Palpimanus with smaller control individual or with
individual whose stridulatory organs were impaired and found that impaired spiders suffered significantly higher cannibalism
than the control spiders. Our study reveals a novel role of acoustic communication in the conspecific recognition of
araneophagous spiders.
Significance statement
Cannibalism is widespread among predatory animals. However, cannibalism might not be an optimal strategy for several reasons
and should be a less preferred option for predators. Palpimanus spiders are prey specialised predators preying primarily on other
spiders thus the risk of cannibalism is even higher than in generalist predators. These spiders possess stridulatory apparatus and
they often stridulate following a contact with conspecifics. We found that cannibalism occasionally occurred during contact with
conspecifics and that the probability of cannibalism increased with the size difference between the interacting individuals. When
the spiders were not able to stridulate during contact, the probability of cannibalism increased significantly. Our results thus show
that Palpimanus spiders use stridulation to reduce cannibalism among unequally sized individuals.
Keywords Acoustic signal .Araneophagy .Defence .Intraspecific interaction .Predation .Spider
Introduction
Animals communicate via visual, chemical, tactile, vibratory,
and acoustic signals. Acoustic communication is widespread
and diverse not only among vertebrates but in arthropods too
(Alexander 1967); yet, the biological significance of sounds in
arthropods is often elusive (Lazzari et al. 2006; Wessel 2006).
Acoustic signals are employed in interspecific interactions,
e.g. to deter potential enemies (Alexander 1960;Masters
1979;UetzandStratton1982;Marshalletal.1995;Lazzari
et al. 2006), to locate prey (e.g. Jones 2005; Surlykke and
Kalko 2008), or in intraspecific communication, particularly
during courtship and copulation (Gwynne and Dadour 1985;
Maddison and Stratton 1988;UhlandSchmitt1996).
Communicated by J. Pruitt
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2541-3) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
*Eva Líznarová
liznarovaeva@centrum.cz
1
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk
University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University,
Vin ičná 7, Praha 128 43, Czech Republic
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2018) 72: 127
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2541-3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.