Content uploaded by Vicente Mustieles
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Vicente Mustieles on Jul 08, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Mustieles V, Messerlian C, Reina I, Rodríguez-Carrillo A, Olea N, Fernández MF. J Mental Health
& Clin Psychology (2018) 2(1): 6-9
Mini Review Open Access
Page 6 of 9
www.mentalhealthjournal.org
JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH
AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Is Bisphenol A (BPA) a Threat to Children’s Behavior?
Vicente Mustieles1, Carmen Messerlian2, Iris Reina1, Andrea Rodríguez-Carrillo1, Nicolás Olea1, and Mariana F.
Fernández1*
*1University of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM); Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Spain; Consortium for Biomedical
Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain.
2Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Article Info
Article Notes
Received: February 02, 2018
Accepted: March 05, 2018
*Correspondence:
Dr. Mariana F. Fernández Universidad de Granada. Instituto
de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Spain; Tel.
Phone: +34 958241000 ext 20367
E-mail address: marieta@ugr.es
© 2018 Fernández MF. This article is distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License.
Keywords
Bisphenol A
Bisphenol S
Bisphenol F
Behavior
Neurodevelopment
Endocrine Disruption
Risk Assessment
Precautionary Principle
ABSTRACT
In 2015 we reviewed the state of knowledge regarding the potenal
impact of bisphenol A (BPA) exposure on child neurobehavior. At that me, we
expressed concern about the eects of BPA on children’s behavior, especially
when exposure takes place in utero. Since then, the number of human studies
addressing the BPA-neurobehavior hypothesis has doubled, most of them
reinforcing previous prenatal associaons and frequently showing dierences
between boys and girls. An increasing number of studies have also shown an
associaon between postnatal BPA exposure and diverse neurobehavioral
impairments, including aenon-decit and hyperacvity disorder (ADHD). It
may never be possible to establish a causal link between this specic endocrine
disruptor and a parcular neurobehavioral endpoint; however, research data
on the relaonship between human BPA exposure and children’s behavior has
revealed a relavely consistent paern that cannot be ignored. The mounng
experimental and epidemiologic evidence on neurobehavioral eects
support more than ever the need to apply the precauonary principle during
development, especially in relaon to pregnant women and children. It seems
that the me to act has arrived.
Neurobehavioral disabilities affect millions of children worldwide,
and the prevalence of some neurodevelopmental disorders appears
to be increasing. Subclinical symptoms are even more frequent
and also contribute to a poorer quality of life and lower academic
achievement1. Epidemiologic and animal studies have demonstrated
that exposure to several families of endocrine-disrupting chemicals
(EDCs) contribute to the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment1,2.
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a well-known EDC that can interfere with
hormonal balance, even at low doses, via multiple steroid hormone
receptors that mediate a myriad of cellular effects3. The mechanistic
understanding of its effects is particularly complex: BPA can bind
not only to nuclear and membrane estrogen receptors but also to
thyroid, glucocorticoid, and peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptors, and it can also interact with steroidogenic enzymes,
among other molecular targets4,5. This biological promiscuity
might explain the pleiotropic effects exerted by BPA on behavior,
reproduction, and metabolism6,7. The developing brain is a key target
for this compound, and pre-, peri- and post-natal BPA exposure has
been linked to a variety of altered behaviors, as demonstrated in
multiple experimental models3.
In 2015 we reviewed the state of knowledge on the relationship
between human BPA exposure and neurobehavior5. We expressed
Mustieles V, Messerlian C, Reina I, Rodríguez-Carrillo A, Olea N, Fernández MF. J Mental Health
& Clin Psychology (2018) 2(1): 7-9
Journal of Mental Health Care
Page 7 of 9
concern about the effects of BPA on children’s behavior,
especially when exposure takes place in utero. Although
only 12 epidemiologic studies were available at that time,
studies, suggesting a negative impact of prenatal BPA
exposure on children’s neurobehavioral functioning in
a sex-dependent manner5. The results suggested that
male fetuses were more frequently affected by prenatal
BPA exposure than females, in line with the current
hypothesis of environmental intrauterine sex-dependent
vulnerability8.
Since March 2015, the number of human studies
addressing the BPA-neurobehavior hypothesis has
doubled9–19, most of them reinforcing previous associations
and frequently showing differences between boys and
20
and Roen et al. (2015)21
(2016)13, showing a consistent longitudinal pattern of
internalizing problems, including anxiety and depression
symptoms, among boys from childhood to adolescence
in a birth cohort from the U.S.. More recently, Casas et
al. (2015)9 in Spain, Philippat et al. (2017)15 in France,
and Braun et al. (2017)14 in Canada all supported the
22 in
California and by Evans et al. (2014)23 in a multicenter
U.S. cohort. These reported more frequent behavior
problems related to prenatal BPA exposure in the males
than in the females. Notably, Braun and colleagues
(2017)14 studied 812 mother-child pairs belonging to the
Maternal–Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals
frequent internalizing problems among three-year-old
boys and with poorer executive function and higher social
impairments. In contrast, two birth cohorts observed more
behavior problems24 and social impairments17 related
to prenatal BPA exposure in girls than in boys. Overall,
epidemiologic data support a probable negative effect of
prenatal BPA exposure on children’s behavior in a sex-
dependent manner.
An increasing number of studies show that postnatal BPA
exposure is also associated with diverse neurobehavioral
impairments among both boys and girls10,11,16,21,22. For
example, some studies, including two representative
national surveys, have reported associations with
(2015)10 observed positive cross-sectional associations
in 2730 Canadian children/youths aged 6-17, while Tewar
et al. (2016)12 found a positive cross-sectional association
North American children/youths aged 8-15 years. A more
recent case-control study in China also reported a stepwise
urinary BPA concentrations19. These associations reinforce
data from some previous prospective studies that found
concentrations9,15,24. These associations are also supported
by experimental data25,26.
The human brain is a sexually dimorphic organ, and
major morphological differences are permanently shaped
steroid hormones, especially estrogen and aromatizable
androgens27,28
structural and behavioral patterns in experimental animals,
including non-human primates, increasing, decreasing,
and/or eliminating sex differences29–32. It is possible that
related to the estrogen-androgen balance, given evidence
that BPA affects the gene expression of several estrogen
29 in utero BPA exposure
could predetermine later responses of certain brain areas
to steroid hormones. Moreover, a recent high-quality
experimental study by the Consortium Linking Academic
and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity (CLARITY-BPA)
demonstrated that low BPA doses in utero alter the rat brain
33.
More than 90% of Europeans and Americans have
detectable concentrations of BPA in their urine, and diet is
considered the main source of BPA exposure in humans34–37.
Despite the ubiquity of BPA, its non-persistence and
short biological half-life and the episodic nature of its
frequently producing an important degree of exposure
obtain null results, the so-called attenuation bias15,38.
Therefore, it is possible that we have been systematically
underestimating the effects of BPA, and researchers in the
11,15,38
despite these methodological limitations, the overall
picture of the relationship between human BPA exposure
and behavior is relatively consistent across studies and
populations. Moreover, the widespread nature of exposure
to BPA means that even subtle changes in behavior at the
individual level may have relevant effects at the population
level, with public health repercussions39,40.
In 2008, a National Toxicology Program assessment,
based on animal data, reported that BPA-related neural
and behavioral endpoints were a major concern for fetuses,
infants, and children41. Since then, some governments have
implemented preventive measures, such as the banning
of BPA in baby bottles by Canada and subsequently by
the European Union42,43, and the total prohibition of BPA
Mustieles V, Messerlian C, Reina I, Rodríguez-Carrillo A, Olea N, Fernández MF. J Mental Health
& Clin Psychology (2018) 2(1): 8-9
Journal of Mental Health Care
Page 8 of 9
in France44. Additionally, regulatory organizations such
as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) have been
progressively reducing their estimation of the tolerable
daily intake (TDI) in subsequent risk assessments. Thus,
the TDI for BPA was lowered from 50 µg/kg bw/day to
4 µg/kg bw/day in 201545. Nevertheless, recent well-
conducted experimental studies have shown that BPA can
impact the brain and behavior of rats at doses near to or
even below the current TDI33,46, and it has been suggested
that EFSA’s temporary tolerable daily intake of 4µg/kg
the general population46. EFSA’s forthcoming assessment
will be an opportunity to integrate new experimental and
epidemiologic data and provide evidence in support of
action to protect children’s behavior.
BPA is commonly found in food packaging materials,
being used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics
and in the epoxy resin liners of food cans. The greater
47
many of these products are manufactured using bisphenol
analogues, including bisphenol S and F (BPS and BPF),
which have been shown to be at least as hormonally active
as BPA48. Furthermore, experimental studies of bisphenol
substitutes such as BPS and BPF suggest similar and in
some cases greater adverse neurobehavioral effects than
those associated with BPA49.
It may never be possible to establish a causal link
endpoint50. Nevertheless, it is impossible to ignore the
consistent and accumulating human evidence on the effects
of BPA on child neurobehavior. While future research will
provide greater clarity, the mounting experimental and
epidemiologic data on its neurobehavioral effects support
more than ever the need to apply the precautionary
principle during development, especially in relation to
pregnant women and children5,51. It seems that the time to
act has arrived52.
This work was supported by research grants from
the Biomedical Research Networking Center-CIBER de
Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP).This article
will form part of the thesis developed by Vicente Mustieles
1.
toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(3): 330-338. doi:10.1016/S1474-
4422(13)70278-3.
2.
and neurodevelopment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 13(3): 161-173.
doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.186.
3.
disruption of brain development: Lessons from the characterization
of Bisphenol A. Horm Behav
yhbeh.2017.12.001.
4.
shaping the brain, epigenome and behavior. Horm Behav. 2011; 59(3):
296-305. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.10.001.
5.
exposure and neurobehavior. Neurotoxicology. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.
neuro.2015.06.002.
6.
expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects
in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels
of exposure. Reprod Toxicol. 2007; 24(2): 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.
reprotox.2007.07.005.
7.
literature. Reprod Toxicol. 2013; 42: 132-155. doi:10.1016/j.
reprotox.2013.08.008.
8.
differences in development and vulnerability. Neuroscience. 2017;
342: 4-20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.068.
9.
pregnancy and child neuropsychological development in the INMA-
Sabadell cohort. Environ Res. 2015; 142: 671-679. doi:10.1016/j.
envres.2015.07.024.
10.
Heal reports. 2015;
26(8): 3-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26288316.
11. Perez-Lobato R, Mustieles V, Calvente I, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A
and behavior in school-age children. Neurotoxicology. 2016; 53: 12-
19. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2015.12.001.
12.
of U.S. children. Environ Res. 2016; 150: 112-118. doi:10.1016/j.
envres.2016.05.040.
13. Perera F, Nolte ELR, Wang Y, et al. Bisphenol A exposure and
symptoms of anxiety and depression among inner city children at
10–12 years of age. Environ Res. 2016; 151: 195-202. doi:10.1016/j.
envres.2016.07.028.
14.
Bisphenol A Concentrations with Child Behaviors and Cognitive
Abilities. Environ Health Perspect. 2017; 125(6): 67008. doi:10.1289/
15. Philippat C, Nakiwala D, Calafat AM, et al. Prenatal Exposure to
Nonpersistent Endocrine Disruptors and Behavior in Boys at 3 and
5 Years. Environ Health Perspect. 2017; 125(9): 97014. doi:10.1289/
16.
exposure and neurobehavior at 8 years of age: Identifying windows
of heightened vulnerability. Environ Int. 2017; 107: 258-265.
doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.021.
17.
exposure and social impairment in 4-year-old children. Environ Heal.
2017; 16(1): 79. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0289-2.
18. Minatoya M, Araki A, Nakajima S, et al. Cord blood BPA level and child
Mustieles V, Messerlian C, Reina I, Rodríguez-Carrillo A, Olea N, Fernández MF. J Mental Health
& Clin Psychology (2018) 2(1): 9-9
Journal of Mental Health Care
Page 9 of 9
Sci Total Environ. 2017; 607-608:
19.
Environ Pollut.
2018; 235: 141-149. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.056.
20.
exposure and child behavior in an inner-city cohort. Environ Health
Perspect. 2012; 120(8): 1190-1194. doi:10.1289/ehp.1104492.
21. Roen EL, Wang Y, Calafat AM, et al. Bisphenol A exposure and
behavioral problems among inner city children at 7-9 years of age.
Environ Res. 2015; 142: 739-745. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.014.
22.
bisphenol A concentrations and behavior in school-aged children.
Environ Res. 2013; 126: 43-50. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2013.06.004.
23.
and maternally reported behavior in boys and girls. Neurotoxicology.
2014; 45: 91-99. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2014.10.003.
24.
Bisphenol A Exposure on Behavior and Executive Function in Children.
Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5): 873-882. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1335.
25. Zhou R, Bai Y, Yang R, et al. Abnormal synaptic plasticity in basolateral
rat exposed perinatally to low-dose bisphenol-A. Neuropharmacology.
2011; 60(5): 789-798. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.031.
26.
in the rat concomitantly with impairment of tyrosine hydroxylase
immunoreactivity. J Neurosci Res. 2004; 76(3): 423-433. doi:10.1002/
jnr.20050.
27. Bao AM, Swaab DF. Sexual differentiation of the human brain: Relation
to gender identity, sexual orientation and neuropsychiatric disorders.
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011; 32(2): 214-226. doi:10.1016/j.
yfrne.2011.02.007.
28. Berenbaum SA, Beltz AM. Sexual differentiation of human behavior:
Effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones.
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011; 32(2): 183-200. doi:10.1016/j.
yfrne.2011.03.001.
29.
disruption and behavioral changes following low-dose in utero
bisphenol A exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110(24): 9956-9961.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1214056110.
30.
Brain Sexual Differentiation in Mice Exposed Perinatally to Low,
Environmentally Relevant Levels of Bisphenol A. Endocrinology.
2006; 147(8): 3681-3691. doi:10.1210/en.2006-0189.
31.
behaviors towards its mother by prenatal exposure to bisphenol A
in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) during early suckling
period. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009; 34(8): 1189-1197.
doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.03.005.
32.
male juvenile cynomolgus monkeys prenatally exposed to bisphenol A.
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2014; 44: 46-52. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2014.05.004.
33. Arambula SE, Belcher SM, Planchart A, et al. Impact of Low Dose Oral
Endocrinology. 2016; 157(10): 3856-3872. doi:10.1210/en.2016-1339.
34.
Int J Hyg Environ Health.
2009; 212(6): 685-692. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.08.002.
35. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, et al. Exposure of the U.S. population to
bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health
Perspect. 2008; 116(1): 39-44. doi:10.1289/ehp.10753.
36.
children and mothers from six European member states: Overall
results and determinants of exposure. Environ Res. 2015; 141: 77-85.
doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.08.008.
37.
A and reproductive hormones and cortisol in peripubertal boys:
Sci Total Environ. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2017.09.093.
38.
Biomarker-based Studies. Epidemiology. 2016; 27(3): 378-388.
doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000460.
39. Bellinger DCDC. What is an adverse effect? A possible resolution of
clinical and epidemiological perspectives on neurobehavioral toxicity.
Environ Res. 2004; 95(3): 394-405. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2003.07.013.
40. Bellinger DC. Comparing the population neurodevelopmental
burdens associated with children’s exposures to environmental
chemicals and other risk factors. Neurotoxicology. 2012; 33(4): 641-
643. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2012.04.003.
41.
report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of bisphenol
A. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008; 83(3): 157-395.
doi:10.1002/bdrb.20147.
42. Canada Consumer Product Safety Act. 2017. http://laws-lois.justice.
43. European Commission - Bisphenol A: EU ban on baby bottles to enter
into force tomorrow. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-
44.
Containers Enacted BPA Ban in Food Containers by 2015. 2012.
Law Banning Bisphenol A in Food Containers Enacted_Paris_
45.
of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs. EFSA J. 2015; 13(1): 3978.
doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3978.
46.
developmental bisphenol A exposure on sperm count and behaviour
in rats. Andrology. 2016; 4(4): 594-607. doi:10.1111/andr.12176.
47.
tip the scales on bisphenol A (BPA). Andrology. 2016; 4(4): 561-564.
doi:10.1111/andr.12219.
48.
Environ Health Perspect. 2015; 123(7): 643-650. doi:10.1289/
ehp.1408989.
49. Rosenfeld CS. Neuroendocrine disruption in animal models due to
exposure to bisphenol A analogues. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2017; 47:
123-133. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.08.001.
50. Colborn T. Neurodevelopment and endocrine disruption. Environ
Health Perspect. 2004; 112(9): 944-949. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
51. Vandenberg LN. Exposure to bisphenol A in Canada: invoking the
precautionary principle. Can Med Assoc J. 2011; 183(11): 1265-1270.
doi:10.1503/cmaj.101408.
52.
to Act. Curr Environ Heal Reports. 2014; 1(4): 325-332. doi:10.1007/
s40572-014-0025-9.